Did you know, God is the Master Accountant? Never a loss, always a credit..Gen15:6 is an Accounting Transaction, in the Hebrew/Greek inspired Bible text (corrected translation): "Now when Abraham had believed in the LORD, He Accredited him, resulting in [Abram having] Divine Righteousness." [See also Romans 4, which explains this verse, and Romans 10:9, which harkens back to both Romans 4, and Gen15:6. See also James 2:18-26, which references Gen15:6 to show how God makes faith 'work'.] Free. No works. Just believe. Whoa! How can God do this yet be Righteous? Click here to savor the profitable fatness, Isa55! God's Absolute Accounting Principles!

If God exists, and we do also, then He must have a BLESSING Plan for our lives. If a Plan, then an "itinerary", a kind of TRAVEL PATH to go from where we are, to where He wants us to be so He can bless us. For, if God exists, and we do also, then He must WANT to bless us. For if God exists, and we do also, then we are too puny, to do anything at all for Him. So He must LOVE us, and that's why we exist at all.

Since God is Truth, ONLY GOD ALWAYS MAKES SENSE. So, a claim about God, or about His Blessing Plan must make sense, to be correct. Not just a little sense, but total sense. Totally Gorgeous Sense. For, what is "Righteousness", but "Right" + "[Gorg]eousness"? Can't be good enough, if merely "right". Must be Gorgeously Right, to be good enough for Gorgeous God. Glorious, in fact. Heh: another "G", for Good Reason! "Taste the Lord, for He is Good", says Ps34:8, 119:103. Heh. The latter Psalm was composed on the death march to Babylon by believers who were daily tortured, raped, deprived in every horrible way man can invent. The LORD TASTES SO GOOD, even all suffering becomes ba-tampte, tasty. His Truth Renders Tasty Even Hell Itself! Ps22:6! Ps31:5, the last sentence Christ spoke before expiring on the Cross!

Man on the other hand, is not Truth, so often doesn't make sense. So man doesn't 'taste' so good. For man abuses Righteousness, to turn it into tyranny: Satan's swan song. So man constantly piggybacks onto God, so to claim his own good taste! So always suspect as a LIE any claim which emphasizes man, his behavior, or his role. Such stress on man never makes sense, and is always power ploy: man pretends love for God, but really uses God's Name to effect MAN's desires over his fellows.

So when you read BOTH prongs of Rom3:23, it makes zero sense to claim we must be good little boys and girls; our bad is too bad, but our good is too bad, as well. Verse says "all have sinned AND COME SHORT of the Glory of God." So, we're brainouts: it's not about behavior, we're too "short"! Then there are scads of parallel passages like Isa64:6, Zech 3, Phili3:8, which graphically depict even our righteousnesses as disgusting filth. (Get an unabridged lexicon and study the real words!)

So man's claim that we must be good for God, makes no sense; doesn't 'balance'; fails the Truth Audit. For, Rightness ends where tyranny begins. Which we know, because Omnipotent God could just zap 'good' into us at birth, so we couldn't sin; so, He wouldn't need to Juridicate a Cross, to make us 'good'. He could just obliterate us, so we wouldn't live forever, since compared to His Infinite Righteousness, we will always be "short", even when made good! So Enquiring minds want to know: WHY did He do this -- to Himself, bearing in Omniscience our appalling puny-nesses? What could possibly render TASTY to Infinite, Gorgeous, Holy, Peerless GOD -- our nonending existence? Even, forever seeing those of us who will forever choose the Lake of Fire, because we want our "filth" more than we want to even once believe in Christ (see Luke 16:20ff, Rev20:11-15, Zech 7, all "Pharisee" verses in context)...

Oh, He Must Have Another Reason For Decreeing the Cross; a reason so vast, it warranted Nailing Away All Mankind's Sins 2000 years ago: a reason so awesome, even Judging His Own Son, which Omniscience will forever see, was a pleasure? What reason could possibly ACCOUNT for such an extreme decision? What benefit to Eternal God would JUSTIFY verses like Heb12:2 and Romans 5:8, John 3:16? Oh, look at the answer! the drama of Fellowship created, Romans 8! Stone too heavy to lift, Isa53:5's Hebrew da'ath by means of dakah! We can taste Him because He BECAME the Truth (Jn1:1-4,9-14, 14:6) and thus used that Truth to all the way through His Substitutionary Death, Isa53:11 (in context)! Because He was crushed like a tola worm (Ps22:6), we can get Doctrine squeezed into us (Jn7:39, 1Cor2, Phili2:5)! Christmas, 24/7, True Communion (Phili3:8-10)! Eph1's purpose, Eph4's building us in Him, Eph3:19! To enable us to Grow And Know Him, 2Pet3:18! To Be "Near", Eph2. [Bible keyword.]

So His Reason, Is Relationship. "Fellowship" with GOD, Deut 6:5, 2Cor13:14, Eph3:19! Sharing in His Very Nature, 2Cor5:21, Rom5:5, Heb10:10-17, Matt25:21, Luke 22:17, John 13:8-9, 1Cor9:13 and Levitical sacrifices, Col1:12, Heb2:14, 12:10, 1Pet4:13, Rom11:17, 1Pet5:1, Eph3:6, Heb3:1, 14, 6:4, 12:8, 2Pet1:4! 1Cor15:43, sown in dishonor, but raised in maximum honor, like HIM, 1Jn3:2, forever! Thinking Like Him to please Father, forever, Heb11:1+6's Greek! 2Cor3:3, 1Pet2:3-9,21 (in Greek); 2Pet1:3-8!

God rescues/saves you to Himself permanently the first moment you SIMPLY BELIEVE CHRIST PAID for all your sins on His Cross; once you've believed in Him, you are forever rescued from Hell, period. For as the Lord Himself said in John 16:9, salvation is never about sin or what people do. But rather: Do You Want To Live With God Forever? If "yes", you believe in Christ; meaning, that He paid for all your sins; that His Payment Alone can justify your relationship with God forever. For God is Infinitely Holy, but none of us are infinite, let alone holy. Christ solved that problem. Hence, it's only about believing in Him, not about sin, etc.

Here's more on why we all have the same problem, no matter how nice we are to each other. God is Infinitely Perfect, so there's a two-pronged BARRIER to life with Him. First, a MEDICAL and LEGAL barrier, that we sin; but second, another MEDICAL barrier, that we are not infinitely perfect. As Romans 3:23 puts it, "for all have sinned, and come SHORT of the GLORY of God." So we need to be rescued from this hapless condition. So, John 3:16 says in the Greek, "For God loved the world so much, with the result that He gave His Uniquely-Born Son, with the final purpose that whosoever believes in Him shall NEVER perish [in Hell], but has Eternal Life." So, Acts 4:12 says in the Greek, "There is no other Person given among men by Whom we MUST be rescued/saved." Romans 5:8 says in the Greek, "God demonstrates His Love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died AS A SUBSTITUTE for us." So since a Substitute, then no other Person is given among men by Whom you must be saved. NO OTHER.

So clearly, sin is not an issue since He died for us "while we were yet sinners". So clearly, no ritual or good deed is relevant, either. The One Who Paid, is the object of belief, not some ritual, for crying out loud. So obviously: if you believed you needed to be baptised to be saved, you are NOT saved. So now, just believe Christ paid for your sins right now, and you are forever saved. And kiss all that ritual and angst good-bye, as you say Hello to the One with Whom You will forever LIVE, John 3:16. God is refreshing, never petty.

God's Infinite Perfection can't be satisfied by any sacrifice other than Infinite Quality. What makes God Infinitely Holy, is Love. Which means, He'd never do anything less than Infinitely Competent. Righteousness is a standard of Competency, really, so way higher than whether one doesn't sin; you can sin and not be infinitely competent, right? Um, so this means we creation can't ever measure up, since we can't be infinite; so OF COURSE we sin: it's frustrating to not be as competent as God. So look at the juridical problem He faced: that would mean no creation should be made! It's an impossible dichotomy Love would never accept! Well, Infinite God relishes the impossible, due to that Same Love. So the Infinite Challenge was, for the Holy Spirit to Teach Divine Thinking to the Humanity of Christ, so that Christ's Infinite Quality Thinking could pay for sins. Divine Thinking in Humanity alone is sufficient 'sacrifice'. All the while, that Humanity had to eschew using His Own Nature as God -- which made all the waiting on the Spirit Who taught, Infinitely Harder. How Christ survived even to get to the Cross, and then on the Cross?! is a story one never tires of recalling. All sin is 'matched' by thoughts He had when the sins were imputed to Him, such that when Omniscient Father 'looks' at the sin, He 'sees' Christ's Thinking! And we all know, it's only the thought that counts...

So you can be sure that the very nanosecond you believe in Christ, you are permanently rescued. Your appointment with hell, got blotted out.. by His Thinking on your behalf, while on the Cross. Forever. [Isa53:10-12 in the original Bible texts explains this process, blow-by-blow; the entire Bible, the entire universe, the entire history of mankind, revolve around those three original-text verses. Provably. Translations always fail to translate the Greek text, which supplies information the Hebrew texts, miss. See last full screen of Isa53.htm. Once you truly learn Isa53:10-12, your understanding of God, and your confidence in God, will skyrocket.]

• "True Spirituality". You're spiritually comatose if you're not regularly naming your sins directly to God. Just name them. No Additives. It was true in the OT, and true in the NT. So the page goes through how you know that, so you can vet the content yourself. So, being carnal, well.. this is why Bible is so badly taught, interpreted, translated, lived, for centuries.

• Is belief in the supernatural, goofy? Short thinkpiece on how what we consider natural, an ant would consider supernatural; how we can't be the most-advanced life forms in the universe; how therefore a more advanced life form would be "supernatural" compared to us; how therefore "God" would be the ultimate lifeform, as the Ultimate Cause. So it can't be goofy to believe in the supernatural; it can only be goofy, to deny it or to goofily define it.
• Warning about Use of HaShem & other conventions (for Jewish readers)
• Who's on first: the Art of Hearing and Reading [Do we 'read' what the writer means?]
• Site Purpose, My Bias This page is only useful for those who can't justify reading content without knowing something about the writer's bias or nature. Frankly the writer is irrelevant, since truth is authored by no one, and proves itself in the reading. At best, we can only REPORT our findings. So the webpage is about testing bias, not so much about what I believe.

• Due Disclosure of God's Design. God's Design in BIBLE and nature uses hupostasis to teach us; this two-sided structure is also commonly observed 'law', whether civil, or natural: Ultimate "hupostasis"=God&Man, get it?

• "God's Soliloquy", a great dramatized summary of God's Plan for your life. The Soliloquy runs about 18 printed pages in XP's "smallest" View font, and is a table linked to DDNA.htm. The latter is a sophisticated page, but the "Soliloquy" table should be pretty easy to understand. This is one of the best-written pieces, in all 'my' stuff.

• Pagetop Basics links are repeated, here:

  Royal Gospel Brief

  False Gospels?

  Gospel=Insult?

  God's Royal Itinerary for Us

  God's System

  "Right" Pastor?

  Spiritual Royalty Brief

  4 Royal Life Essentials

  Effective Royal Prayer Protocol

  Salvation Attributes

• The Pure Genius of Salvation (A good, time-saving Gospel and post-salvation life synopsis.)
• Salvation Components Chart (Text below chart is amazingly good; chart needs more work.)
• TULIPS? NOT Calvinism, but a simple page showing Salvation & Post-salvation basics. Also fixes TULIP's errors.

• What's a "Right" Pastor-Teacher? It's always been true that God Personally Picks a Pastor for you to be under. For Church, the role of the pastor is much more vital than obtained in the OT; for now Canon (Bible)=Christ's Thinking, is Royally completed: so the Body of Christ can be Royally Completed. 1Cor13 is on this topic, but is mistranslated (Head wordplay throughout 1Cor is missed). Eph4:11-16 is on how this Head gets into our heads: through a "metron..merous" (plunder sharing system, term references Isa53:12's merizw in LXX), with pastors being the connection centers of distribution (aka "joints of supply" in most translations, Eph4:16). In RightPT.htm, Eph4:11-16 had to be re-translated from the Greek, since English translations of it are so bad: passage succinctly proves why and how God uses individually-tailored pastors to pour His Thinking Plunder into their congregations, as the implementation of the Isaiah 53:12 "sharing" contract of eternity past, (which ties to Ephesians 1, Romans 12, many other passages). "True Riches" are Christ's Thinking, and you can only get your 'metron' (share) of His Thinking through a pastor God appointed personally for you. All your eternal inheritance depends on how much of His Thinking you get while you are down here. To see the plundering origin, you'll probably also need to read Isa53trans.htm, since Isa53 is badly translated, too. Sorry. All of the DDNA webseries (starting with DDNA.htm) is based on this contract. For God is Pure Thought, and that's Divine DNA. For your soul doesn't die, only this world (and your body in it) dies. You really can "take it with you": the real I.T., His Thinking.

• Musings re Spirituality vs. interChristian 'fellowship' Theme: Does "God" get REPLACED BY "People" in the name of 'Christian fellowship'? And, how much real 'fellowship' with even people is actually occurring? Piece is kinda windy, because I was trying to figure out the answers to those questions.

• Multi-Religion Index. MANY Links, including secular colleges and anti-Christian sites: all unrelated to me.

• Surprising Conclusions from my website research. The prior version of this page was completely gutted in 11/05. The replacement version allows scanning overall website research content for what might interest you. Any report should state what it found. Some of the surprising results are important, and you will doubtless disagree with some of them. Conclusions listed are not defended, just stated. Websites most associated with the conclusions are also listed; and often, directly linked.

• Evolution's taxonomic tautologies, and possible "fixes". Short webpage, unusual analysis. Like the Jungian school contends, now "science" is our myth. Science is in grave danger, if it doesn't FIX the problem of its own descent into religious dogma. How 'evolution' needs to be re-postulated, in order to preserve the respect science deserves. I'm really worried that science will go back to the dark ages, solely because "evolution" is so transparently a dogmatic assertion failing ALL scientific standards of inquiry. We don't need to give religious idiots any further grounds to destroy reason, do we?

• First Law of Math conclusively proves Transmutation is False. Key here is "a set cannot contain itself." This site is a mathematical upgrade on the prior bullet's content about taxonomic tautology, but uses words instead of formulae to illustrate both problem and its correction. Key is to reinstate the "missing link" modern science has long sought and can prove true, which ancient science had already recognized as true: Hupostasis. Einstein's theory of relativity, the Four-Fold Nature Of Time, and universe expansion topics are briefly included, to help show how the "missing link" can be used to correct other conundrums in scientific theory. There's no missing link: it's just a problem of science MISclassifying the nature of what it observes. We're talking a simple taxonomic blunder, which can easily be fixed. The First Law of Math is the 'detective' of taxonomic misclassifications.
  Finally, the page summarizes the originating Biblical definition of "transmutation", i.e., in the Greek of Rom12:2, Eph3:15-19, Col1:25-27, 2Cor5:17 and like passages, which math proves secularly: the site's Endnote has a brief on that topic.

  Transmutation can only happen spiritually; man essentially became an animal in his soul when he sinned; so devolution, not evolution, is what we observe: science has it backwards, as usual. A really great book proving this true was ironically written by an atheist (or agnostic), Julian Jaynes. You can probably buy it at Amazon, bn.com, etc. Title has the words "Bicameral Mind" in it (I forget the whole title, just now). Read it and then compare what Bible says, so you can see how Jaynes proves Bible's contention, while meaning to debunk it. Or, just search for "Jaynes" in SpirPath.htm, to get a gist summary (but I'd really recommend reading the book).

  God can reverse our devolution, and instantly does so STRUCTURALLY due to the Cross; however, since our souls are still trashed and ALIVE, we need to consent to an ongoing functional transmutation in our soul, as commanded in Rom12:2's Greek. The degree of functional transmutation "enlarges" (Greek verbs auxanw and megalunw) your spiritual capacity for intimacy with God. Now you know why we get a Bible to learn and live on. This Soul Transmutation takes a lifetime, so requires a much longer explanation as to its nature, function, etc. So the DDNA webseries is about all that; it's very long; DDNA.htm is its header page. The transmutation takes place under the auspices of a Trial between the Lord and Satan, so God's Transmutation Plan is also covered from a Decree and Functional Relationship, Trial amalgamated 'view'at length, in the mammoth "Thinking" series. Start with LordvSatan1.htm. This is a lot of reading, sorry.

• Does God Exist? Unusual ways to determine the Existence and Nature of God. The "Due Disclosure" link at Home pagetop is now very helpful, too. Frankly, the "Nature" question is more important, because as you prove "Nature", obviously "existence" is demonstrated. The intra-page links in SurpConc.htm direct you to other webpages which might have helpful Nature-brainstorming information. God means for you to think over whether and if and how He is. It's never wrong to question; it's very wrong to be dismissive, fearful, full of guilt, etc. "Wrong" only means harmful, and is never a truncheon of condemnation.

• Gospel Objections. 6/03 revision: introduction now shows how the "Believe.. or burn" Gospel applies even to Omnipotent God, First. For if God is Omnipotent, and by definition He must be, then even He has the Power to sin: which, if He did sin, He would no longer BE Omnipotent, and thus would be helpless to fix Himself. So "Believe or burn" is not some nasty rule He arbitrarily imposes on man, but instead reflects Unadulterated Truth. For, if even GOD would become totally wretched and offensive forever if He ever sinned, how much more, we? No matter how much we pretend otherwise? And if we weren't really wretched and offensive, we wouldn't need to tell ourselves how 'good' we are! One doesn't need to become what he already is, but needs to become what he is yet not: like that line in Shakespeare, we "protest too much." A 'little bit' pregnant is still pregnant; a 'little bit' of cancer is still cancer. We are pregnant with cancer, and need curing. So why, oh why do we find it either offensive or shameful that He offers us a total forever cure for our wretchedness, if we authorize that cure by merely believing in Christ?

• Bible bloopers or..bumpkin bloopers? Quicklink to Gospel Obj. #6, revised 6/2003.

• Is God a Murderer? (God's alleged "genocides", and related Justice Issues)

• "God is not magic." Gist: God is REAL, so you 'relate' to Him as REAL, not 'magically'. God is GOD, not dog. So He isn't to be treated as a genie, nor should we expect ourselves to be magically-godlike, capable of being good on our own. For example, in order for you to have relationship with an ant, wouldn't you always be doing something for the ant? Could the ant magically do something beyond its ant-ness? What's the value for you if the ant chanted a prayer over and over to you? How good is the relationship, if the ant demands you heal it? If the ant 'marries' you for goodies, is it you, or the goodies that the ant loves? See? We all assign some kind of insulting magic as a standard for relationship with God, however rational we mean to be. As a consequence, we likewise render all relationships, sterile. Yet the real Truth is far more enjoyable than even ideal magic: provably.

• Exposing Grail-type Myths. This site was originally the first of DDNA.htm's appendices. It's now been spun off to its own page. It blasts out of the water, two common Grail-type myths. The first one, by Christians, is the myth that somehow Christ's physical blood 'magically' paid for sins. Big, stupid lie. The second one, promulgated by Islam and other anti-Christian sources, is the goofy idea Christ had kids. This latter of course has been recently popular. Like P.T. Barnum said, there's a Bible-ignoring sucker born every minute.

• Verbal Plenary Inspiration. Very short note on what "Canon" really means: Bible's Inspired, Infallible, Inerrant Nature. See also Caveat#2. Frankly, get into the original-language texts, and when you see the sheer genius of the wording, you'll know that you're looking right at God, Himself. Alternately, you can look at how Satan&Co. make all the fake holy books and Bible mistranslations POINT to the Bible's original-language texts, and make wordplay on them (admiringly and derisively, all at the same time). To explore this latter idea, take a gander at the "Grand Strategy", "Seven Signature" and "Ex" links starting in SatStrat.htm, which is the Appendix to the "Thinking" webseries. Humans aren't this smart, sorry.

• How Bible Translations become Hearsay, and then.. Heresy. This webpage has been deprecated (it has been re-added in 2024 just in case someone wants to read this 'older' material). Replacing it, are SurpConc.htm's "Re Satan's Plan", and Caveat2.htm. Also, you can see the problem better via the corrected translations of specific verses in the "exegetical pages" of the next section. Or, in whatever other webpage you're reading.

• Bible Cites on Trinity, by category. There are thousands of verses demonstrating God is Trinity, both in OT and NT. Careless handling of Bible, misses them. So the webpage categorizes only the rhetorical styles (the WAYS God chooses to state Trinity), with sample verses: since to list all the verses, would take years!

• Daniel 9 Timeline of Messiah, God's PROMISE structure of Time: use for testing Biblical dates vs. 'scholarship', esp. because the latter is so often wrong. God orchestrates ALL time around the Jews, because He orchestrates all time around Christ (Who is also Jewish). It's a lot to read, and there's a whole bunch of conflicting stuff on the internet about Daniel 9. So beforehand, you might instead want to read the blissfully-short: Ten Ways This Timeline differs. Hope it saves you time, heh.

• Shorter synopsis of Timeline, titled "A Question of.. Time?" It's part of the "Does God Exist" webpage, since if you can prove Time is being intelligently orchestrated Biblically, you'd have proof of God and His Identity.

• Mirror, NOW! post-70AD proof of Timeline still playing in history, even now. Site is a postscript to Mirroring.htm ("Daniel 9 Timeline of Messiah" link, above), and is significant enough to get an extra link, here. You won't understand it very well, if you're not at least familiar with one of the two links, above. Objective is to show how God is still orchestrating time based on the 490-year segments, to free mankind from religion. (If you read Gen3, you'll see that original sin is based on a religious motive, to make self as good as God. So the sin nature is religious in nature, with gross sin merely being a subset, a religious 'rebelling against'. Two sides of the same sin coin, really.)

• "GeneYrs.xls", an Excel spreadsheet timeline from Adam through 2006 which complements both Mirroring.htm and MirrorNOW.htm. Dramatically shows the 1050-year and 490-year increments of Time Grants in God's Blessing-by-Association Time Accounting System. You can vet all this data, and the dates in Biblical periods come from the Bible itself.

• Case Study in Flawed Dating of Exodus, see how the Daniel 9 timeline allows correct dating of this event; how historical facts and math corroborate its dating. The data is all testable.

• Passover Plot: another Case Study in Flawed Dating, re Christ's Birthdate and His Passion Week. What's awesome here is the FIT of His Birth and Death Dates into Israel's holiday calendar. Israel's holiday calendar is a mirror of history, and its first six months is mirrored in the last six months (hupostasis, get it). "Modest Proposal" section in the page walks you through that panoramic meaning. See for yourself how the Daniel 9 timeline allows correct dating of these events; how Bible verses, historical facts and math, corroborate the dates; especially, how erroneous ideas about when Christ was born and died -- and what happened in His Final Week -- are entirely due to not reading Bible.. for centuries! The data is all testable.

  ---

  Caution: exegetical pages below are provided only so you can see
  why these (often-mistranslated) verses are used in my other pages.
  Ideally, you should instead get exegesis (etc) from your pastor.

  Many verses are exegeted and corrected in translation in each webpage, since Bible in translation is so bad, but the ones below are pivotal to understanding what's the spiritual life.

• 1 John, whole letter retranslated with exegetical notes. This document goes verse by verse, with the corrected translation of each verse in blue, the actual Greek text (pasted from BibleWorks) and small font exegetical notes explaining why the translation differs from the Bible you have. That way you can just skim it easily for the blue-font translation, or dig deeper to test it before God.
  You can instead get 1 John's exegesis from my pastor's website, if God wants you to do that. Here, as is my normal due-diligence practice, I exegete and translate first WITHOUT recourse to his exegesis (which I have); this, because he taught his entire congregation how to do that function because he wanted to teach Bible only from the original-language texts, proving from GOD'S TEXT, not his opinion, what Bible says. Then, I'll go back to test my results against his and anyone else's I can find. Idea is to be uninfluenced, just using BIBLE, first. Who cares what the truth is, so long as it comes from God?

  God won't hold our pastors accountable for how we read Bible, even though God appoints each of us a pastor personally. So this is due diligence. 1Jn's full re-translation will take me a long time to do. Now I appreciate why my pastor spent daily Bible classes of a year or more, exegeting this book; it transformed his ministry, according to what he says on his live Bible class tapes.

• MisTrans.htm gives you a short list of some egregiously-mistranslated verses, without spending lots of reading time. Idea is to show the pattern of them, and how satanic blinding hits all believers, even our best and brightest scholars. So absent 1Jn1:9, we are all satan-fodder for falsehood. Pretty much every webpage demonstrates the foregoing sentence, as it was a recurring surprise during website writing, how badly Bible is translated. (I didn't learn Bible in translation, so I didn't know it was so badly mistranslated, until writing these sites.)

• RightPT.htm has a "Bible's Badly Translated" link is a bit longer, explaining more about the types of translation errors categorically.
  If you like a longer and more chatty writing style, then also peruse Purposeo.htm's "Cup" section: blue text shaped like a cup, you can't miss it. Then keep reading through the end of that webpage.

• 1Jn2:5, Exegetical Notes. You don't love God if you don't cherish/guard/hold close-in-you-thinking The Word. This page is being replaced (upgraded) by 1JnTransandExegNotes, above.

• Heb11:1, Exegetical Notes and corrected translation. Trans should be "BibleDoctrine Confidently Believed=Christ On [Angelic] Trial=Evidence Unseen", or similar words. It's Angelic Trial verse which sets up the OT "witness" roster of that Trial in Chapter 11 (showing the legal precedence). This webpage used to be a section in Part IVa of the Lord vs. Satan (aka "Thinking") series; it was spun out to its own page, and is an inset to Part IVa of that series. Eventually the other Heb11:1 exegetical stuff will be 'copied' or 'gathered' to this webpage. This verse is critical to the spiritual life, and is very mistranslated in every Bible of any language I can read (i.e., Latin-related languages).

• Heb10:15-17, Exegetical Notes and corrected translation. Book of Hebrews is on the change of covenant away from Israel, to Church, and how the latter will be used to rescue the former; this passage shows how Thinking Canon was the promise OT folks yearned for, but we get (eventually, for their sakes). Very dramatic.

• Isa53:10-12. This passage gives blow-by-blow description how our sins got paid on the Cross and what Legacy comes from it. Exegetical Notes on both BHS and LXX, with both fresh LXX translation of vv10-12, and how well BHS and LXX combine. Yet lexicographers and scholars consider LXX's v.10-11 a problem, not Biblically valid (yeah, if God only knew the kindergarten version of language)! Yet, NT writers reference and play on LXX vv10-12. So LXX deserves attention, shouldn't be left out of OT Bible translations. Instead of waiting for that or politicking for that (and thus wasting your life), just see for yourself, what's there.

• Isa52:13-54:1, Expanded translation with exegetical Notes on both BHS and LXX, more technical. Focus is on how you trace the original-language wordplay which runs rife in this chapter (which actually begins in 52:13, and ends 53:12). Isa54:1 is a conclusion from the previous chapter, which in translation makes no sense, but flows perfectly from the original-language texts. So, you can see for yourself this is true, from this webpage. Three types of translations are offered: a working translation without explanation, an expanded translation with exegetical notes, and a poetic translation, to reflect Isaiah's own meter. All three translations amalgamate the LXX and Hebrew texts for Isa53:10-12.

• Click here to read BibleHebrewMeter.htm. KEY TO OLD TESTAMENT HEBREW METER is furnished. If you've been following my Isaiah 53 series from about six years ago, you'll recall that in April 2008 I finally learned Isaiah's meter; then in July, that the meter is used as a CALENDAR. Well, that led to comparing Isaiah with Psalm 90, in May 2009. What a shock! Isaiah 53's meter is deliberately crafted from Psalm 90's meter. So now you can see what rules both Isaiah and Moses 'followed', to craft their chapters. So now, an overall hypothesis regarding the "rules" for Old Testament Hebrew meter can be formulated! So this page advances the rules, but the codification description needs much improvement.
  The page contains the metering videos for both passages, so you yourself are witness to the phenomenal results. You'll see the 'rules' that both Moses and Isaiah followed, for yourself. So maybe you will come up with a better phrasing of the codification?!

  Bible Hebrew Meter is really important for a number of reasons: 1) solidifying interpretations for hotly-contested doctrines like Trinity, Hypostatic Union, Rapture, and for all prophecies with timelines (like Daniel 9); 2) textual criticism, the art of deciphering what the REAL words in the Word originally were; 3) WHAT DATES the Bible says things happened -- for the meter has a CALENDAR function. So, for example, Moses writes Psalm 90 in 1400BC, so the number of syllables ending his Psalm equals the number of years to the time Israel rejects God as King and Saul is appointed. So, Isaiah has his meter start in 712BC and end at 37AD -- same endpoint which God uses in accounting Daniel 9. So you have An Audit Trail Of Dates BIBLE provides. For we perennially look OUTside Bible rather than INside, to interpret it, and then conclude the Bible obtuse or even erroneous?! Guess again!

• Rom10:10, Exegetical Notes -- Mistranslation of 2nd preposition "eis" has led lots of folks to believe you must confess Christ with your mouth. Nope, not true. The opposite is true: "because of" (="eis") salvation, you are even able to say you believe in Him.
• Rom12:1-3, Exegetical Notes and corrected translation. Gotta see this to believe it. Paul is talking about getting Christ's Thinking as transmuting you. Translation makes it look like works transmute you. Incredible mistranslation blunder, given context (Chap11). Oh: Paul's referring back to the contract of Isa53:10-12 in the LXX, so you'll want to read that section of the above exegesis webpages as well, yikes!

  ---

• Testing the Truth. Very short overview on evaluating Scripture. Revised 6/03.
• NT Interpretive Keys. Keys to Biblical interpretation the Bible itself uses. This needs much editing, but it's good for brainstorming.
• Verse lists, categorized by doctrine. This gets regularly updated, but coverage is still sometimes sparse; over time it will be improved. In other webpages the verses are more thoroughly provided, within the topic addressed. Key with Bible is to think theauretically: synonymal words and concepts, in endless hubbed array. Deft Infinite-Quality Divine Thinking! Breathe 1Jn1:9 and just try to think like a thesaurus repeatedly, as you study; John 14:26 means the Holy Spirit will enable you, since your repeated trying are VOTEs to learn His Thinking! For with God, it's always and only about Voting, Free Will choosing to know Him. TEST this claim, see for yourself!

• Bible..Bumpkins? For my #scripture cohorts: brief review on how we don't know our Bible; on how Bible was kidnapped throughout history, until about the 1800's; cautions on debating Bible in chat; study aid recommendations (see also the Bible recommendations in Latestchgs.htm). To show the importance of proper study, the webpage shows the corrected translation of James 4:5, which verse stumps scholars (why, I can't fathom). Debating Bible is good, for it gives you practice in living on Scripture; notice how everyone debates and uses Bible to think, in the NT (really, the OT also). But if you're not studying Scripture, not breathing 1Jn1:9 and learning Bible under your own right pastor, then you're wasting your time, bumpkinning around, all hot and puffed up...
• "Common Biblical Interpretation Errors". Site is intended to be a collection of links on specific, common errors folks make about Scripture, but no links have been done, to 'answer' the list. One should determine why and where one has errors for himself, in God's System. So this site may end up being deleted, later on.
• Lie Detectors you can use. Part of "Thinking Out Loud" series, Bible-sophisticated.
• Quick Lie Detector Simpler version than the "Lie Detectors", above.
• No Soul Life In Womb. See Caveat #4, also. This page is about the Juridical basis for our salvation and post-salvation life, and only tangentially 'answers' the falsehood of the Christian prolifer 'right' (which is neither Christian nor right Biblically). You aren't alive until you are independently breathing. You aren't spiritually alive until you are breathing spiritually, and 1Jn1:9 rescues you from spiritual apnea. But if you don't know the juridical basis of the woman's condemnation; if you don't know how the Bible is reverse-translated versus the Inspired original (original says soul is imputed at BIRTH, not before); then you'll not understand your salvation or your spiritual life's NATURE, either. Politicking is evil, no matter what side of an issue a Christian is on: Rev17 harlot, baby. So this page doesn't take a political position, but rather the spiritual position alone matters. Leave Caesar out of it, Matt22:21, Exo21:22.

Note: except for the "Basics" box of links, pretty much all sites are fairly advanced. So if your eyes glaze over, start with the stuff in the "Basics" box, and breathe 1Jn1:9 to get the Holy Spirit's brains (we are all too dumb to live, apart from His Brains). You'll be very surprised how smart He can make you, instantly and over time. God's System link (in white box at pagetop) explains this process, and it's GOD's Way of making you smart, no matter what your human limitations, faith or societal status, etc. You can prove that assertion, by 'doing' the Five Elements in His System. It's private; no one but God and you will know.
• Thoughts on Katrina. Bullet list analyzing how the warning provisions of Leviticus 26 play out live in 2005.. all over the world.
• "Spiritual Pathology Principles" +Diagnostics. Preferably, use this only on yourself.

• Divine DNA webseries. This is the micro counterpart to the "Thinking" series; God is out to transmute our soul's thinking into His Son's Thinking, per the Love Contract in Isa53:10-12, and 1John, but you can't see all the contract provisions in translation. Thinking replicates without mass or energy transfer, because Infinity is neither mass nor energy, but is Pure Thought. So you could call this "God's DNA", the Infinite Thought. Put in Christ by the Holy Spirit, paying for our sins, and thus available as "plunder" (term in Isa53:10-12) for us. Very long, very sophisticated series. Thought replicates and mutates just like biological DNA does, because the secular always depicts the higher spiritual Truth. Biological DNA is the "instruction set" which tells your cells how to be: without that instruction set, you'd be dead. So without the Divine Instruction Set which the mere biological one depicts, you can't breathe or live well spiritually, either. Very long, very sophisticated series; all the inter-page links are at the top of each webpage in the series. A quicklink to its first page is also at Home pagetop.
• Spiritual Growth Principles in 1 John. revised 3/2004. Needs much more upgrading.

• Thinking Out Loud II, a recasting of the doctrines and ideas in the "Thinking Out Loud" series, as a fictional novel playing 'today'. If you've been reading the Thinking series since it first came out in the year 2000, this novel format might help you spot errors or correctness in ways the original series didn't make clear. Only the first few chapters are uploaded, so it's short.

• The original "Thinking Out Loud" webseries: 'Epic workpaper on God's Grand Design for Time and History in context of the Angelic Appeal Divorce Trial to Reveal His Son. God doesn't have to do things the hard way, but chooses the hard way. So the question is, WHY would God be so hard on Himself? Hence the historical framework is the Angelic Conflict, which was the proximate cause for Adam's creation. Series is very long (over 2000 printed pages) and surprisingly sophisticated, especially Part IV; so don't print it out.
• Click here to read more about the purpose of Thinking series.

This section was replaced; I can't find purgatorio.com anymore. But you can click on Funny Christian websites