This is a very sensitive topic to almost everyone. Frankly, I abhor confrontation; so I didn't want to put anything about abortion in my webpages, because to me the only issue is knowing God. However, I finally realized that, just as my pastor taught for decades, to claim "abortion is murder", legally speaking, blasphemes God: though of course no one means to be blasphemous. Worse, in a way, is the resultant effect: truths about God Himself are missed, when false doctrine about abortion clouds thinking. So, reluctantly, I realized I'd better write about it. Please understand this up front: I am adopted, so obviously I would never go crusading in the streets on BEHALF of abortion. In fact, crusading itself is always condemned, in the Bible. So this webpage is not -- repeat, not -- intended to convince you of anything at all. Rather, to just disclose results of the research I ended up doing. Thus I have the freedom to be frank, and you have the freedom to reject or accept whatever you choose for your reasons. Ahhh.

For, I had to do this research anyway, given my pastor's teaching. I do a more objective job in research if some other human might read it. Ergo this page: this webpage is constructed solely based on BibleWorks data, unless I state otherwise. My pastor has his own way of teaching, and I always try to find an independent method of demonstrating a doctrine in my webpages, because (obviously) not everyone is under my own pastor. If you want a really good summary tape of what he says, I heartily recommend Lesson 1872 (and following) of his 1992 Spiritual Dynamics, where he shows how the Virgin Birth, not the Virgin Pregnancy, is what made Our Lord's Humanity. For his website, click here. You will have to mail in any order (choice of audiotape, videotape or MP3); they never ask you for money or put you on a mailing list, thank God.

IMPORTANT: You cannot understand salvation's structure and the total efficacy of His Sinlessness, if you don't understand that there is NEVER soul life in any womb. So you will screw up your spiritual life if you don't understand this VERY CLEAR Bible doctrine which is always mistranslated in every Bible translation I can read in BibleWorks' huge software collection of Bibles. Frankly, there's no excuse whatsoever for prolife campaigning. By the time you finish reading this webpage -- if you are inclined to do so -- you should see plenty of reasons why 'prolife' is a satanic game, nothing at all related to God, duping everyone involved in it.

Only God's Word is relevant; not our politics. No Christian should put anything above the Word. This research was a real eye-opener for me, but my feelings aren't relevant. Instead, here's what's truly relevant: All life is only worth living, to see Him; there's no other reason to even be born, but to Know Him. David essentially wrote the same statement, but beautifully, in Ps139:11-17; some of that passage will be discussed in a white table, below.

So, we all have pastors appointed for us by God. We are to respect them. Mine teaches one thing, yours might disagree. Ok. But we ourselves are individually responsible to the Lord for what we make of the Bible's meanings, for what we believe, so we have no right to claim a belief without our own due diligence. For one thing, if your pastor is right, how do you know, really, what he means, if you don't do some research? Isn't it disrespectful, to show so little interest in what he teaches, that you don't think about it more? Research in the Bible, more?

Doesn't it show disrespect for God, if you don't think about what you are taught? Of course, the converse is also disrespect, to just swallow a wrong thing a pastor might be teaching. Pastors are, after all, human. Moreover, what they teach has to be somewhat simplified since they are talking to a group of people, not merely you or me. So, we shouldn't make gods out of them, but do our homework. We should be under pastors; we shouldn't argue with them if we learn they are wrong, or badmouth; we should research what they say, to understand better: to understand GOD better. For, only God is worth living for.

That's the reason for this webpage. However you feel about abortion, you surely agree that Bible is authoritative. The Authority, the perception of which is run by the Holy Spirit, Who Wrote Scripture. So what follows should be perused or studied or read or pitched or whatever, Under The Spirit. Use 1Jn1:9 like breathing, so you can profit. Or, quit this webpage, as you see fit, Before The Lord.

Here's a too-brief categorization of some of the ways Bible communicates that life begins at birth. It's really about when life begins, not about illicit sex. It's really about What God Thinks, How He Is, not even about people. For, you learn things about God by how He does things, interacts. That's the real value of this webpage, especially the white table on (the fabulous) Ps139, below.

As time passes, I'll cull my other sites for the verses which were noted in passing, and improve the listing here. Search on "abortion" or "prolife" in a site if you can't wait. Please don't mistake the strong writing style for my personal attitude. When you see how God expresses Himself, you'll hopefully realize I'm only trying to mimic His writing style; well, really, report His style -- I'll never be able to truly mimic so many levels of wordplay.

---

So for now, here goes:

• patent paradigms (Adam's creation, John 3's born-again, James 1 how sin is born) -- the largely-Attic Greek of John 3:16 uses the indicative mood of didomi with conjunction hoste, a very rare construction which stresses actual result rather than the normal 'infinitive of conceived/intended result' for that conjunction, so is a clear play on monogeneis (uniquely-born) -- else, only Gal2:13 uses hoste+indic.,in NT;
• beginning-and-ending of life cycle is always rendered born..die (i.e., in Proverbs, but there are dozens of these in Bible);
• VERBS about birth and death which stress 1st or last INDEPENDENT breath;
• original-language sophisticated punning, esp. on "spirit" (ruach in Hebrew, pneuma in Greek), though "soul" verses (nephesh, Hebrew, psuche, Greek) are sometimes relevant also;
• sexual innuendo (many many of these, never translated properly; also, a favorite and subtle technique of Paul's in making analogies, esp. in 1Cor2,6,7,12, 2Cor2-5, Rom8:11-end, Eph2, Galatians -- okay, everywhere);
• special verses listed in my sites on this topic but I don't remember them all now; in the "why no soul life in womb" section below, a few are examined in some detail.

• Most importantly, Bible uses parallelisms which play on pregnancy as a type of DEATH, with the resultant BIRTH (salvation+inheritance of His Thinking in writing) as the spoils. [The inheritance of His Thinking in writing is the biggest promise in Scripture, the one Jews revered the most, and nearly every Bible verse has something to say about that promise. See, for example, Ps119. Also, Isa 53:11 bluntly states that His Thinking is what paid for sins on the Cross (da'ath/sunesis); it ties to 54:13 and all of 55, esp v.2,8,11, to show the promise of His Thinking to Israel being fulfilled via the Gentiles (v.5, etc).] The white table below exegetes some of Ps139:15, where David parallels the formation of his body to being buried under the earth. "Dust" verses also allude to the analogy. This wordplay is quintessentially stressed in Isaiah 53, esp. verses 10-11, but you won't see the awesome wordplay in the confusing translations; and you won't understand Isa54:1, unless you do see the pregnancy metaphors he uses in the Hebrew of Isa53, at least one metaphor per verse. [Immediate context is the deliverance of Israel, and Isa53 is on the mechanics. "Salvation" first mean Deliverance/Rescue in both the Inspired Hebrew and LXX.]

  If ever you wanted to know why God would go to the grief of making creation, and how the Cross 'works', this passage will satisfy you (sexual pun intended)! Paul seems to frequently allude to Isa53 as if it were the 'Grand Central Station' of Scripture, and with good reason. James does the same thing in James 1. The Lord of course does it in John 3, Matt4:4 (linking Isa53 to Deut8:3-4 and Isa55:8,11). Wow: one could write an entire website on this topic alone, showing the many ties in Corinthians (which is loaded with allusions as a subtheme, tying to 1Cor2:16, which ties to Isa53:11's Hebrew and (later epistle) Phili2:5-10); Colossians; Ephesians; Romans 5-9 (esp. 6, end 7 and 8:11ff); 1Peter1; all of 2Pet (Peter's God-given allotment of Ephesians' content?); Hebrews Chaps 2, last half 9, and Chaps 10-11; also, "riches" and "seed" verses. Awesome stuff. If you are a seminary student studying for your doctorate, and are fishing for a topic, do it on Isa53... Click here for exegetical notes on Isa53.

  UPSHOT ==> God's Design, Purpose, and Love as exhibited through His Plan for Christ on the Cross, as well as our salvation, cannot be properly understood or appreciated until one understands that no life is in the womb. We are dead to God until He makes us alive, be it physical life, or spiritual life. So it's pro God's Life to scrap our scrawny, petty, puerile religio-political agendas which only abort interest in God; and instead, recognize what Bible says about death being true until a) God breathes life into you (no other agent), and b) God makes you reborn that first nanosecond you first simply believed in Christ. Absent that understanding, the believer will constantly mistake his or others' flaws as 'counting' for something; same, for any (humanly-deemed) 'merits'. To miss out on what glory the Bible communicates here using the pregnancy-versus-birth metaphor is to miss 'a bizillion dollars' in happiness.

• Bible's use of sophisticated verbs, suffixes/prefixes, prepositions, and 'you' 'your' 'my' possessives, are vital to proper translation. A translator or committee protocol which is hung up on political correctness always bypasses these nuances. One can empathize, since man is so mean-minded, no one in authority is allowed to be human -- yet the student of the Word should therefore dig deeper in the Word to avoid misinterpretation. The above link on Isa53 provides examples.

When 'political games' are played with something in/about Bible, you can always tell. Just as the Lord got seven kangaroo trials which foolishly broke every tenet of Roman and Jewish law for the sake of politics, so it goes with Bible translation and teaching. Hostility to truth always makes for a foolish testimony, so the 'witness' always has egg on his face. Of course, debunkers aren't the only ones who have an 'agenda'. Thus it should be no surprise that the above bullets on sexual innuendo and syntactical categories are the most revealing and important, BUT! are plagued by bad scholarship; and nearly always, bad translation. It's really hard to find lexicons which don't euphemize. You almost have to look outside Bible lexicons to the ones for Greek literature. The translators appear to be constrained to euphemize.

Nowhere are the political machinations more patent than with the selective MIStranslation of Bible Hebrew and Greek prepositions min (Heb) and ek (Greek). Though for min and ek the correct meaning, BEYOND, FROM OUTSIDE, is stressed in seminary texts; and even though there is extensive etymology on min (i.e., even in Badillo's History of Hebrew Language, purchasable from Amazon), translators are selective about when they correctly translate these prepositions. WHY, well.. you decide. You can search them in some software, and compare how and in what cases BEYOND, OUTSIDE, SEPARATED FROM, AWAY FROM, is correctly used (the prepositions ONLY have that meaning in the partitive, particularly "min").

And indeed, when "womb" is nowhere in the vicinity, the BEYONDNESS nature of these prepositions -- especially min -- is recognized. Take, for example, the horrific Hebrew phrase in Isa52:14, describing how the Lord's Humanity was beaten BEYOND HUMAN SEMBLANCE. The Hebrew of that verse is as follows (spelled phonetically): k'asher shamemu alek· rabbim; ken mishat me ish mareyhu; wa toaro me bene adam. Each of the "me" words are the preposition min, simultaneously meaning (play on the Hypostatic Union) BEYOND HUMAN, as well as being human. So (in context of 52:13) beyond-human origin, beyond-human glorification, hence beyond-human TORTURE. Nearly every Bible translation recognizes this BEYOND meaning for the preposition min, in this verse. It's a horror verse, how He Who is Our Savior is beyond-human, beaten up by us. No one disputes it.

So WHY, when the object of these SAME prepositions is "womb", do English Bibles use "in" or the misleading, truncated, "from"? Do you realize, the translation thus signifies THE REVERSE of what those prepositions mean? Only NIV had the courage to translate Luke 1:15 properly. Amazing, since where other Bible verses have exactly the same original-language words, yet are still reverse-translated (like other versions). (French and some other foreign-language Bibles demonstrate occasional courage, and correctly say, "from birth".) BIG difference, in English, saying "from the womb" or "in the womb"; versus the correct meaning, "from OUTSIDE the womb", or, simply, "from birth".

Here's what I think happened in the case of these prepositions, as best I can decipher, so far. Granted, for centuries the Bible was under the lock-and-key of the almighty 'Catholic' Church. So what people thought the Bible said, was what they were told. And what the Church came to say, in effect (but maybe not purpose) distorting something in Talmud, was that a person existed from the moment of conception, forward. Never mind that even a bill isn't really paid until the money comes OUT of your bank account. Thus, the Church got control over procreation. So, translations between this time and the Reformation, were made. So, reflected the Reverse Translation (reversing OUT with IN), where expedient to power-over-the-people. So, by the time of the Reformation, these older translations were "tradition". So, were copied, not fixed. So, are used even today to gain political/religious power over people, the same Rev17 harlot, only now every denomination rides the beast.

So, even now, these (and many other) verses remain mistranslated, with few exceptions (like the NIV of Luke 1:15). Despite teaching you can get in even first-year Greek or Hebrew about these prepositions. Lexicons, of course, are politically aloof, so need not comment on a translation. Rather, lexicons only gather a history of what 'respected' scholars in the past have said. So the embattled student of Scripture must do a lot of legwork to find out what's correct. My pastor is but one of those who did that legwork. (There are others, though few.) My pastor passed what he learned onto our congregation, accusing no one. (Just 'study and teach', is his motto.)

What amazes me more than anything else, is this: here for a century we have had the original-language manuscripts, which all blatantly prove the mistranslations are wrong, and even deliberate -- yet now, when the original-language manuscripts are freely available on the internet -- now, we pick to trumpet the lie that life is in the womb? We didn't ever do that in history, though we didn't have such free access. If ever there were proof of Satanic involvement behind this 'prolife' cause, it's here. But of course, no one even cares what the Infallible and Inerrant Word of God has to say. So of course, Satan thus gets Divine Authorization to mess with us. To our shame.

Of course, you shouldn't just conclude, oh, we've been lied to! Far from it. People are too keen on blaming someone when they discover a serious error, which feeds Satan's cause, the more. What a self-defeating proposition, to accuse: just like Adam accused God, in the Garden (see Gen3). So also we do, costing everyone scads of money, pain, and everything else that's bad.

The Lord didn't accuse, but instead went to the Cross. So blamesmanship should get left behind, if we even claim to love Him. For example, let's pretend there really was some kind of coverup conspiracy with respect to the Bible in general, and this thingy about when human life begins, in particular. (I doubt that man is so smart: Satan, yes, man, no.) Even so, the Catholic Church, like any other group in history, is a conglomerate of people. So you can't go pointing the finger, because a) everyone ends up being to blame, then; b) even if everyone isn't to blame, everyone gets hurt. We shouldn't have trashed Enron, or Arthur Andersen. So let's not trash anyone else. A bad thing has happened: let's just fix it.

Frankly, I don't call these continuing mistranslations even "lying", but rather being too-busy or fearing to show too little respect for the past, or.. you name it. Frankly, those in authority fear the masses. So fear being 'caught'. They are very beset by the mass clamor to 'do' something (we masses are gross, trailer-park trash, picking on those higher like gnats). So, they cover up, k? If you've ever had any kind of authority over someone, you should be able to empathize. To a child, a little mistake is devastating. So, the parent covers up. Surely we can empathize. Unless we are too gross ourselves, and trailer-trash.

Doo-doo happens, and it happens for a lot of reasons, even though there is accountability which can be spotted. What we all must recognize, instead, is that God's Word rightly translated and taught is the more important. Whatever the political repurcussions. So we, not someone else, are responsible for what we, not someone else, believes. Of course, it's easy to say what's right. Doing it, though, takes Divine Power. So we are, really, all to blame -- but all helpless. So let's forget about finger-pointing, and just focus on the issue. Let's just learn, and forget "what's behind", like Paul says in Philippians.

So what do we do? We do our own homework: so that privately before the Lord we ourselves have a clear conscience. You should not 'buy' what 'I' say just because 'I' say it. You have to do your homework; I have to do mine. You have your own reporting before the Lord; this, is mine. Granted, we obviously can't afford not to study the significance of these bulleted verse categories. Granted, it would be disrespectful to reverse a belief absent valid reason. However, each one, before the Lord, determines for himself how he should do that homework. Again, what follows is a brief, on mine. Ideas you can use, if you are so inclined.

One of the first rules of hermeneutics is that you compare Scripture with Scripture. You never interpret a verse in isolation. Moreover, every truth will have boundaries, as illustrated in the famous Proverbs passages about there being a time to be born, and a time to die (time being the operative boundary). So if you read a verse in isolation, you won't know its parameters. Worse, if you read a verse in translation, some key nuance in the original languages which entirely changes the meaning, goes unnoticed.

We all know that we all differ in our interpretations because, essentially, we are all unique, so we all read Scripture differently. How right or wrong, well.. no one's perfect. No one's wholly wrong, either. But only God Is Perfect, so only with continual breathing of 1Jn1:9 as needed, plus diligent contextual study of His Word, do you get closer to His Truth. That is the task of the believer. Believer gets a pastor, and the latter ideally specializes in Word study. But, what if the pastor is too busy? What if the believer didn't hear the pastor correctly? What if the pastor, being only human, is 'off' on a particular topic, for now? So, we too are not free from the liability of testing: "judge for yourselves" verses in NIV, and Elihu's comment at the beginning of his speech to Job, "the ear tests truth". Ooops.

---

WHY No Soul Life in Womb?

---

Frankly, what hit me the hardest during all the verses' research is God's Adamancy that ONLY HE CREATES LIFE, and He didn't want ANY connection with human procreation, due to the Fall. (That topic takes up a large part of LordvSatan2.htm's "In the beginning..Man" section, which can't be recounted here.) No auto-pilot 'distance', no competition, no 'help' from anyone/anything else. He uses adamant POSSESSIVE language on this topic, in the OT; focus is related to GOD ALONE IS HOLY, ONLY WHAT GOD DOES IS GOOD: remove your shoes, Moses, no man-made altars, only God 'calls' (makes) a prophet human (common OT refrain -- Paul uses it in Galatians, too). NT language on birth/death seems more clinically-focused, stressing actuality versus planned/ intended/ conceived, because the larger policy statement is that Love, Infinity is not 'complete' without taipeino, "going low" (verb is in Phili2:7, explains how to interpret the always-mistranslated "kenoo").

There seems to be a deeper message, when you add all the hundreds of passages together. Here's what I get from it: 'I only I create Life of ANY kind [so, no evolution, either], for apart from Me, there IS nothing.' Of course, some of you will recognize that the first clause is the OT (phrased variantly in Bible); the second clause, is a play on the famous I-am-the-Vine verse in NT. Those two, frankly, seem to be where God is 'coming from' in His Adamancy, expressed here in the language of Sovereign.

As mentioned in one of the bullets above, there's a common refrain which goes something like this in the OT, which Paul uses in Galatians: I CALLED YOU I FORMED YOU I MAKE YOU OUTSIDE OUTSIDE OUTSIDE THE WOMB. Which all add up to this really strong statement: You're not a 'you' until I make you. And I don't WANT to make you, until you are OUTSIDE the womb. (English never gets these verses right, so you'll have to search on "womb", to find some of these verses; then diligently study the original languages' text.) So, I found via this possessive expression, which each of the prophets uses somewhere in his book, the why: for to me, an interpretation is always suspect until it completely accords with God's Essence as the Bible describes Him.

The clearest thing about His Essence we can all understand, is Infinity. My mother taught me Infinity when I was only four years old, she says. So, even a child can 'get' the idea that Infinity IS never 'distant'. Intimacy, always. Whether will also wants closeness, is a separate question. You can be in traffic, 'intimate' with it, therefore; but your mind can be a million miles away, if you want. So what God WANTS, is definitely to be connected (for that is Infinity's nature, anyway) -- but.. on HIS Terms. For fifty years, my pastor has stridently taught and proven from the original languages of Scripture that God's TERMS are, HE makes human life OUTSIDE the womb. However, in the table which follows, I'm only using BibleWorks software to demonstrate the point. [That sofware is but a grouping of various Bibles in original languages and translations, with lots of lexicons and other reference materials (not the best of lexicons, but ok: I have Bauer Danker, BDB, HALOT, among the usual ones like Strong, Thayer, etc).]

The woman who interrupted the Lord got quashed by Him for giving mommies credit too: Luke 11:27-28. The 'milk' of the Word, not even mother's milk, is what gets the credit.

My pastor has always stridently stressed that the soul is instanteously created and then imputed TO the EXITING body AT birth; just like Adam's body was first made, and next "ne shemmah" was imputed (lit., LIVES, not "life" was breathed into him -- human spirit AND soul, my pastor says that means); so next "man became a living soul" (Gen2:7, again). (Elihu recounts the same procedure somewhere in his speech to Job.) My pastor can't talk about this Luke passage in (what used to be daily) Bible class, without going through the whole explanation. So, since you know I got the exegesis of the above table on Ps139:13-17 solely from BibleWorks, you know two other witnesses of at least some credibility, exist. BibleWorks, of course, is a collection of texts, not an interpreter. So the interpretation in the table or of my pastor, can be independently verified. Of course, it's faster still to use 1Jn1:9, ask Father in Son's name to help you see for yourself what's the truth. God can't be wrong.

Let's return to the topic of His OT style of Possessiveness about being SOLE CREATOR. HIS Perspective is Infinite, so is all-encompassing. We all know God is Truth. Not merely some truth, but Infinite, ALL truth. So, for Truth To Be Truth, it must consistently operate. A TRUTH MUST ALWAYS WORK IN THE SAME ROOT FASHION. So, then: it makes Sense that Sovereignty would have this Possessive, Want-To-Be-Intimate attitude, given God's other Attributes, for if (and we know it's true) God is Infinite, then He is adamant about whatever 'opinion' (so to speak) He 'has'. He must WILLFULLY connect Himself to a thing for it to be valid. If the thing itself of itself, though sparked (neshemmah, word in man's Genesis creation), does anything OF itself, God is NOT in that. Of course, sin is something we do of ourselves, and Christ Had To Connect Himself To Sin On The Cross Or We Wouldn't Be Saved.

In short, just because God is Infinite doesn't mean He chooses to be involved. And He never chooses to be the sponsor of sin; never chooses to be the sponsor of anything less than Infinite Quality, His Standard. So, doesn't 'touch' it. Just as we can look around the room yet not be touching everything IN the room, so also God, even though 'in' everything, doesn't 'touch' everything. For, that is an act of WILL. [God wills to be connected or not. He doesn't have to actually 'touch'. So the latter term is a figure of speech. Bible likes to use the word Word to stress this fact, among other meaning layers for using "Word". To more easily see that God need only WILL a thing, and it exists, see Matt4:3 and Heb1:3 (really, first 10 verses or so). There are lots of OT passages, too. That's also a layer of meaning in the reason why Moses was supposed to SPEAK to the Rock, in 2nd Meribah (depicts faith-in-Christ and God's response of salvation, in many layers of meaning).] And He doesn't WILL sin, nor wood hay stubble (man's production), but only GOLD: which covered the Ark, which covered our sins, which covered every topic in every living thought of our Living Savior, Christ.

So, when Adam sinned, we ALL die in Adam. (Rom5:12 GReek tense in hamartano, plus 1Cor15:22 are sample verses on this topic.) If God 'touched' the developing fetus, EITHER by putting a soul in there (which makes no sense anyway, for the fetus isn't formed, but Adam was first FULLY formed); or, if God 'touched' the developing fetus by Himself making life of it in any way, even merely biological -- then God would be sponsoring sin. If, on the other hand, the woman is punished by means of pregnancy (which she was, a new biological process, Gen3:16, strong language), then a thing which does 'of itself' can be 'touched' by JUDGEMENT. Condemnation. Adam's Original sin bears 'fruit' (see that analogy in James 1:13-15). So, can be 'ruled on'. So, can be saved.

For, to condemn a body which should get a soul after it's independently viable (law of precedence from Adam's creation), means to simultaneously condemn and bless by means of the same condemnation. Justice is thus not compromised. Hence a Virgin Pregnancy and Virgin Birth can ALSO be had, without compromising Justice. Because there is NO soul in the womb. [My pastor explains that Adam's original sin is imputed to the body at its birth, and has a different way of stating this paragraph. You might prefer his explanation.]

See, God thinks of every judicial angle. Perfectly. No one can out-lawyer God. Satan ("opposing attorney") really thought he put one over on the Most High, when he got the woman and THEN Adam, to sin. But look: the body forms on its own, due to condemnation of the woman. So, the sin nature of Adam (via DNA in sperm) bears its 'fruit'. Which, at BIRTH, must also BE CONDEMNED, for it is now OUT ON ITS OWN. Can't condemn the woman twice (no double jeopardy), but NOW the process, itself a condemnation, 'bears' condemnation, get it? But wait! Just like David observed in Ps139:15, shall these "bones" be cast off, when Adam's were NOT? After all, Adam was a far bigger sinner -- its originator -- than David. Shall God renege on his Precedence which HE established, in Gen2:7? Oh no! So, what must happen? A soul must be breathed INTO a CONDEMNED body.

But Look: there's a question of soul 'fit'. After all, the moment God creates a soul, that soul will live forever. In the BODY which exits the womb. Is it FAIR for that BODY to GET a soul, given what God KNOWS IN ADVANCE a soul would BE, in such a body? Is it FAIR, for the REST of the UNIVERSE of souls? What if creating a soul and imputing it to a body is UNFAIR to do? What if doing it is UNFAIR to the rest of the other souls who HAVE or WILL exist, or BOTH?

Who can know the answer to these questions, but GOD? God alone knows what a soul would do with itself. Logically, since there are spontaneous stillborns and abortions, God must have decided it was unfair that the fetus come to term. Well, there must be a reason. As Ruler, it's GOD's Responsibility to make this decision. Who else can have competent jurisdiction? So what right do Christians have, to tell God what HE should do? Perish the thought, 1Cor2:15!

So, then: if a fetus exits the womb and, · la Gen2:7b, life is breathed INTO it, it will cry out or exhale. Then and only then, do you know it was fair for that body to become a human being. Else, no one but GOD can decide. And, just as God used Pharaoh, who was clearly evil; just as God used Hitler, who was clearly evil: what right have you, oh man, to tell God He should have CAESAR prohibit those who want abortions? Do you want to tell God how to administer JUSTICE? Yikes! Matt7:1-2! Our usually-wiser grandparents weren't pushing for Caesar to outlaw abortion: maybe we shouldn't, either. [I've never found one civil law in any nation, which prohibited abortion. Roe vs. Wade is without national legal precedent. So, were all our forebears, EVIL?]

Yet at that moment, another judicial question arises: how to save that soul, which after all, is not responsible for the precedence God set! Ahhh. It's ADAM'S sin. So Adam's sperm will not be used for a Human Savior (Luke 1-3). For, the woman's chromosomes SPLIT in ovulation, and those sin nature genes split WITH the departing chromosomes. Leaving 23 UNtainted ones. To be completed by the Holy Spirit 'hovering', like He did back in Gen1:2ff. Speaking-into-existence, bara, from nothing, the missing 23 chromosomes. So, idou, behold, the Lamb of God is BORN! Hebrews 10:5! Goes to AND THROUGH the Cross, still perfect in soul AND BODY! John 3, 2Cor5:21! Tetelestai! The Work of Salvation is finished FOREVER! For there is no other name under Heaven given among men THROUGH WHOM we MUST MUST MUST be rescued-to-God. Delivered, that is. REBORN.

So, all throughout ALL history, all those real babies who were born but died before they were able to say no to the Gospel, are SAVED. So, too, anyone who IS able to say no to the Gospel, who instead even once in a lifetime, says 'yes'. John 3:16. BELIEVE. Not receive (have to be a 'newborn' to receive, Christ told folks in Mk 10:15's Greek). BELIEVE IN CHRIST: An exhale of faith, from an inhale of the Theopneustos, God-breathed, Gospel. So the Spirit rehab's us. Perfect, eh?

---

Now, about whether it's blasphemy, to claim abortion, murder

---

Now, let's look at the blasphemy question: is it BLASPHEMOUS, not merely incorrect, to say there is SOUL life IN the womb? For, if you are testing an interpretation of Scripture, only the RIGHT interpretation will conquer ALL the alternative ones. So, let's pretend that no one ever wanted an abortion nor ever got one. Let's pretend further that we BELIEVED life was in the womb, we LOVED that fact, and we WANTED whatever stirrings were there, to BE life. (Which, frankly, is true of every mother; it's part of the biological emotion of motherhood in pregnancy. See an obstetrician.) God would call this BELIEVING, LOVING, WANTING, blasphemy. Understandable blasphemy, unintentional blasphemy, but LEGALLY 'blasphemy', just the same. For, some 'other author' is being credited: biology. Ooops.

See, in Mandarin Chinese, a HARSH "ma" sound means "curse". But a singing "ma" sound, means "mother". So if I, though well intentioned, say "m·-ma", it means "curse mother", and a loyal son would likely kill me. To him, I blasphemed. Doesn't matter I didn't mean it.

And, it IS blasphemy to say the soul is in the womb; for in real life, not all fetuses come to term, human or otherwise; spontaneous abortions, even in the very act of birthing, occur. Of course, there are the deliberate ones, too. But look: GOD LETS IT HAPPEN. He even punished David by KILLING David's firstborn of Bathsheba, seven days AFTER birth. (2Sam12:18.) GOD CAN STOP ABORTION. HE CAN PUNISH IT BETTER THAN WE CAN. So, is God a MURDERER? Perish the thought! But.. um, HE DOES let it happen. So, if NO life is in the womb, then no murder, either. Whew. So, biology we KNOW is consistent with the Bible we know. Whew.

Moreover, if you study biology and especially pathology, you'll find that PAINFUL diseases ARE painful due to blood change, tissue change, organ change, bone change, etc.. Keyword is "change". Heck, even all NON-pathological growing functions are generally PAINFUL. Teething, for example. That's why we have the aphorism, growing pains. So, if there really WERE a soul in the womb, it would FEEL all that DEVELOPING-BODY-PART change (only the soul has self-consciousness, so there is no feeling perceived if no soul). It would BE TRAPPED, TORTURED FOR NINE MONTHS? Tell me: Would Father do this to His Son???? Is God a Sadist, then, to PUT a soul in the womb? He would indeed BE, IF IF IF IF IF there really WAS a soul in the womb. Perish the thought! So, if NO life is in the womb, then no sadism, either. Whew. So, biology we KNOW is consistent with the Bible we know. Whew.

See, we can JUSTIFY pain AFTER birth, because we know that God didn't create sin, so didn't create its effects. So the suffering we go through, the diseases, the abuse, the deprivations, etc: all these are USED by God to BENEFIT us. And they DO benefit us (assuming we CONSENT), because WE ARE ALIVE. We have VOLITION to WANT to understand, to WANT to benefit. But if a soul were TRAPPED in the womb, self-conscious, so able to FEEL all that torturous CHANGE, when the BRAIN isn't even fully formed until shortly before birth (skull doesn't even harden for maybe up to a year AFTER birth) -- VOLITION HAS NO OUTLET. So can't learn anything. SO CAN'T REFUSE TEMPTATION. So can only SUFFER FOR NO REASON. Just like the unbeliever does, because he CAN'T LEARN GOD UNTIL SPIRITUALLY ALIVE. Surely God is no sadist.

That's why a baby who didn't grow up enough to have the faculty of CONSENT (which requires first knowing right and wrong, so requires a few or many years to acquire ONCE ALIVE) -- that's why any baby once BORN who dies, goes to heaven. Like David says: "I will go to him, but he will not return to me." (2Sam12:23.) This, even though it was David and Bathsheba, who committed adultery. But the child was killed. NOT the father. NOT the mother. Is God UnJust? Perish the thought!

That's why an unbeliever HURTS, because he IS alive, and IS still refusing Gospel. And ALL of us were in that torture, once upon a time.

Okay, let's switch gears, and pretend that some magical answer invalidates the above facts. What remains? Well, we are left with the fact that God CREATES LIFE. So, why then should CAESAR get JURISDICTION OVER what belongs to GOD? CAESAR doesn't have the legal standing to CREATE LIFE, and therefore doesn't have the legal standing to RULE ON WHAT creates life. Like Romans 13 says, government is given by God the rod, including capital punishment, but NOT the authority to create life. So, Caesar has no JUDICIAL STANDING on the matter of defining life. Only GOD can do that. Exodus 21:22 is quite clear on that point: it is NOT A CRIMINAL MATTER if a fetus is caused to abort by someone else. Of course, GIVEN the above paragraphs' facts, THIS VERSE NOW MAKES SENSE. Else God would be guilty, too... Perish the thought! [For a list of English translations which properly translate the word "miscarriage" in that verse, pull up SatSpin.htm and search on "Exodus 21:22". There is a small-font note in there which lists at least 6 English versions, including the Catholic Douhay-Rheims. Frankly, what is always the problem in translations is that people CHOP OUT meanings in the original-language words. So, the translations differ. Here, the Hebrew (or LXX) LEGAL PHRASE rendered variantly "miscarriage", "imperfectly formed", etc. is ALL-encompassing, not just one LAYER OF MEANING chopped out to make a translator comply to the one-English-for-one-Bible word STUPID RULE, which no secular translator in his right mind would follow unless he liked getting fired from the job! Instead, ALL the meanings, viz., no matter WHAT DAMAGE occurred to the fetus, whether actually born deformed or not born or aborted..it's NOT a criminal issue.]

So, isn't it blasphemy for man to give to Caesar, what belongs to GOD? The Lord, when teaching Peter about the two-drachma tax, sure seemed to say that: 'Give to Caesar, what belongs to Caesar; and God, what belongs to God.' [Matt 17:24-27; see also Matt22:17-21.] Why then should we-the-people give POWER to Caesar which Caesar should not have, because Caesar doesn't have the JURISDICTION for such power? Caesar doesn't have the right to tell us how to worship, because worship belongs to God. Well, life does too. So God had to GIVE Caesar the rod, not the other way around. Exodus21:22 makes it CLEAR God ISN'T giving Caesar the rod, here, and no other passage IN Scripture EVER calls abortion or miscarriage murder. So we shouldn't, either.

Here's a really painful corollary of the same Exo 21:22, in CONTEXT. Note how the Bible distinguishes between the harm to the MOTHER in the following verses, compared to the fetus. If the MOTHER is harmed, it IS criminal, say the following verses ("life for life" rubric). Note HOW MUCH TEXT is devoted to that. So there's a HUGE contrast between the two situations. So, if a father of a pregnant wife has to choose between mother and fetus, but DOESN'T KNOW THIS DISTINCTION, he himself DEFINITELY commits murder, if he tells the doctor to save the 'child', but not the mother. You can talk to almost any rabbi and get more details on this fact: MOTHER FIRST. So, then: clearly it CANNOT be 'murder' against the fetus, if the MOTHER is to be saved, right? Is God EVER inconsistent?

Another corollary: WHAT DOES GOD WANT? Even if we pretend that it really was murder to abort a fetus -- which, considering all the foregoing, should be at least SERIOUSLY DOUBTED -- but even if we PRETEND it was murder -- SHOULDN'T GOD'S OPINION, RULE? GOD's opinion, not the state's. NOT ours. But, no one in the abortion debate even CARES about God's opinion. The prolifers want a LAW. So they don't care about consulting GOD, only CAESAR. That's what the Jews did, when they opted for freeing Barabbas, but not the Christ. The "free choice" people also don't CARE about what GOD THINKS, for they make all their arguments in terms of the woman's choice. NOT GOD's CHOICE.

GOD SHOULD BE CONSULTED. Not Caesar. Since to consult God is a FAITH issue, it's NOT a civil issue, at all. Ps139:13 in corrected translation makes it utterly clear that GOD ORDERS life, and no one else. So, if a person believes in Him, it's between GOD AND THE PERSON (plus maybe spouse&family, depending on the AUTHORITY facts), what to do. God has the RIGHT to abort a fetus. God has the RIGHT to decree it complete. If you got nothing else from Ps139:13, you should have understood at least that much. So, at our end, we keep all this topic OUT of the civil/state realm and leave it as a private matter between God and the relevant individuals. We can advise and brief the individuals on pro's and con's, but THEY DETERMINE BEFORE THE LORD THEMSELVES what is the thing to do. That way, we're not lying, when we profess our love for God. (See 1Jn2:4-6 in GREEK. English verses are mistranslated, particularly with reference to what "tereo" means.) For, the WORD OF GOD IS LIVING (Heb4:12), so we shouldn't abort it, hein?

So, all this abortion debate is, enfin, HYPOCRITICAL. People with their eyes on people. NOT, on God. Just use His Ineffable Name to justify some HUMAN DESIRE FOR POWER. POLITICAL POWER, Rev17 harlot riding again, so to reproduce the hegemony of the 2nd century, which gave rise to the dark ages, Christianity's greatest, most shameful, blot. Oh, yeah, baby: power power power power. LUST! Who CARES if He is maligned, in the process? WE DON'T CARE ABOUT GOD, He's only good to be a moniker for OUR GREED to call self, righteous! A genie, a go-fer, a dog, to do OUR bidding. It's disgusting, all of it. Hosea was right (Hos4:6 -- it's too painful to say more). Ps143:12, Rom3:10,20. Gal 3:11. Jer 17:9. Hos10:2. Isa 64:6. Lev26: End of the nation, if we keep on going this way. It's not as though the ORIGINAL LANGUAGES were not preserved. (See Rom9:6, parallel in meaning.) Which no one CARES TO CONSULT, of course.

Heck, we don't even know how to consult our own CONSTITUTION, for crying out loud! What, propose what is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, an amendment about marriage, in the 2004 State of the Union address? It's never been right in US history for the Constitution to regulate personal freedoms of any kind. Certainly not marriage, and ESPECIALLY, not RELIGIOUS RIGHTS TO MARRY PEOPLE. Unbelievable! We've lost our minds in this country. WE WERE FOUNDED ON THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. No state religions. God, yes. That's a general term, permitting any manner of belief about how "God" is defined among men in a polity. FREEDOM OF FAITH. But oh no! Now we will break all our founding principles, and that to outlaw a RELIGIOUS marriage between two same-sex persons? IS NO ONE AWAKE ABOUT WHAT EVIL IS BEING PROPOSED? Communism got a toehold in China because the Christians thought that Mao would wipe out the prostitutes, so aided his cause. Beware, crusading legalist! You've lost all SECULAR perspective as well, when you've aborted the WORD...

So if, and it MUST be true, that it's BLASPHEMOUS to give Caesar what God would NOT, where do you draw the line? Are we prepared to go down the road to Nazi Germany yet again? For, the road to tyranny ALWAYS involves a shift TOWARD self-righteous INTERFERENCE with personal freedoms, and ALWAYS starts with hitting on the gross sins. You can track it in history, anywhere you wanna start.

Frankly, most of the impetus for wanting to outlaw abortion stems from a belief that somehow illicit sex goes unpunished. Guess again. There's a scathing passage in either Proverbs or Ecclesiastes in which Solomon writes about mincing-steps-down-to-the-grave. I don't remember exactly how it goes, but I sure remember the upshot: if you screw around with your body, you screw up your SOUL. Language is too graphic to look up and prove, anyway (my pastor nearly lost all the congregation back in the 1950's, when he exegeted and taught what REALLY was in Ezekiel16 or Song of Solomon).

Point is, where do you draw the line? AT WHAT POINT do you STOP the precedent you start, when you give to Caesar, what belongs to God? Do you regulate eating habits next, since you regulate sex habits? What DID JESUS DO? He took illicit sex (using adultery as the moniker) OUT of the Law, when he pardoned the adulteress 'caught in the act' (yeah, the Pharisees were following her around for just that purpose)! See John 8: notice that they were asking Him as Messiah (pretending they believed in Him) FOR A RULING. You know that, because they weren't supposed to bring the gal to anyone BUT the Sanhedrin, according to the Law of Moses. Instead, they bring her to Him. Messiah is the ONLY RULER; else, there's just the law. Jesus is NOT a priest of the Law: Heb5-7 spends a lot of time explaining that; also Heb10. So this is a BLATANT RULING BY MESSIAH. Not, just an informal opinion.

If you search the Gospels on "adultery", you find Christ REMOVED non-criminal SEXUAL SINS from the civil law. Adultery was in the 10 Commandments, so all other non-criminal sexual sins, not being listed, are regarded as lower and SUBSUMED (i.e., consensual homosexuality, prostitution, etc). So to remove ADULTERY, which requires CONSENT, removes all like-category sexual sins from the juridisdiction of human law. Note how He does it: because even THINKING of the act is a sin, it is a WORSE sin than the law can adjudicate, and no law can sentence a thought. So ONLY GOD can adjudicate the issue. The act follows the thought: but Christ did not condemn the adulteress, so no one else can judicially condemn like sins. How deft of God to show us how SEPARATION between spiritual and civil, works. Notice also how deftly VIOLENT and NON-consensual (i.e., one person too young) sexual sin is still UNDER human-law jurisdiction (i.e., rape, pederasty, etc).

Of course, what the Christian routinely fails to understand, historically, is that THE LORD INVENTED A NEW SPIRITUAL LIFE. This is a main theme in Hebrews (from the priesthood standpoint, Jewish metaphorical approach), in Ephesians (from the BUILDING BY FATHER standpoint, Greek metaphor tweaking Euripedes' play, "Ion"), in Corinthians (new spiritual life standpoint, focus of 1Cor2,6,12 and 2Cor2-5), etc. BECAUSE HE IS PROGENITOR FOR FATHER (Heb12:2's "Archegos", in Greek but also see Heb5-10), we have a SEPARATE covenant. Which is NOT the OT System. Quite the opposite, in structure. [Central theme of "Thinking Out Loud" series, accessible from the Home Page.]

So, then: our RULER took CONSENSUAL sex questions OUT OF LAW. Out of criminal law, out of civil law. "Let he who is WITHOUT sin [idiom for, NEVER HAS SINNED] cast the first stone" means NO HUMAN CAN ADJUDICATE. So, GOD ALONE JUDGES ILLICIT CONSENSUAL SEX. Not mankind. This, of course, is a reversal, too: OT Law required stoning. But now, Our Ruler is Risen, and HE HE HE wants the prerogative of how to judge illicit CONSENSUAL sex. A far WORSE PENALTY, now. Because, marriage itself must comply with a FAR HIGHER STANDARD, never before in history: Eph5. Christ and Church. So, only GOD can exact the higher penalty. Caesar doesn't have the CAPABILITY to penalize for NOT MEETING THE CHURCH MARRIAGE STANDARD. Beware of illicit sex, all the MORE, now! I wouldn't even want a hitler to get THAT penalty.

So if the Lord of the UNIVERSE took illicit sex OUT of the law, then we should NOT, at very least, crusade politically on such matters. For, we act contrary to OUR KING, and lavish power on the WRONG 'king'. This is not to say we should just let all manner of gross stuff be as 'okay' as, say, the institution of marriage. But it DOES mean we should FIRST be a WHOLE LOT MORE STUDIOUS of the PARAMETERS in Scripture before we even venture to PROPOSE any kind of political action. That is, if we REALLY EVEN CARE about what God says. Let's PUT OUR MONEY where our mouth is: Matt4:4. "MONEY" is thought. Let's THINK THE WORD, like James counsels in Jas1:1-26. Like Peter counsels, in last half of 2nd Peter. Like Paul counsels, in Phili2:5, Eph4:23, Rom12:2-3, Rom15:4 (well, everywhere). We are FIRST, citizens of Heaven (Phili1:27, 3:20, Eph2:19, 2Pet3:11), and Ambassadors to our home countries (ibid., and 2Cor5:20). So must continually aim to be Model Citizens, in both (1Tim2, Rom13): DueDisclosure.htm has details. [Eph2:2 and 2Pet3:11 don't have the word "citizen" in the inspired Bible's Greek, but the modern Greek Bible inserts the term: not a bad way to translate the root concept in the old INSPIRED Greek, actually.]

So God's Perspective is first of all Sovereign CREATOR. No other. No competition. But also, His Perspective is, as we have all become privileged to know, TOTAL LOVE. Compassion. Mercy. So, no cruel idea of soul life in a womb, no murder, no sadism, and no blasphemy committed. After all, Bible makes it clear also that not even an ANIMAL is really alive until it independently breathes... Only GOD has the Right-to-Life. So for anyone ELSE to grant rights-to-life, is unavoidable blasphemy, however well-intended.

---

Now, about whether no-life-in-womb FITS BIBLE in OTHER ways..

---

But, of course, there is even much more to this doctrine. So, if this Perspective is aptly interpreted, then hermeneutically, a whole lot of RELATED or even UNrelated Bible verses AND THINGS IN LIFE should synergistically FIT when interpreted with this Perspective. For, what we have here is a PARAMETER. Again, We all know God is Truth. Not merely some truth, but INFINITE, ALL TRUTH. So, for TRUTH TO BE TRUTH, it must CONSISTENTLY OPERATE. A TRUTH MUST ALWAYS WORK IN THE SAME ROOT FASHION. So we should see it CONSISTENTLY OPERATE in all SIMILAR contexts. Else, what is called "truth", is NOT. For, "Let God be proved true, though every man a liar." (Romans 3:4.)

So, it now makes SENSE why Bible spends so much time DISTINGUISHING between life which THINKS, and nonthinking (biology can't think); between life which is everlasting, and God's. Technically, ETERNAL, not 'everlasting' life is what we get when born-again: that's God's OWN TYPE of life, which has no beginning and no end. Soul life, by contrast, has no end. The many independent-breath-starts-life passages (most of which use tense or prepositions, as noted above, but often use the language words for breath) focus on these distinctions. So, then there are another whole SLEW of verses which basically COMPARE one type of life to another, from the standpoint of life-most-valuable (with God) is the only one WORTHY of being called "life". This wordplay is most commonly done with the word "spirit", because (for example in 1Jn), if you're not Filled with the Spirit, you're not BREATHING spiritually. It's a dramatic way to wake us up, I guess.

So, since more verses are CLEARER and MORE FITTING as a result of an interpretation, then there's something VALID in the interpretation. Again, the hermeneutical rule to compare Scripture with Scripture, is VITAL. So, let's continue: the universe would not exist until BIRTHED. Big Bang, Gen1:1. Something other than the item itself had to CAUSE the item itself to have an INDEPENDENT 'BREATHING', an independent existence. We know that "Something", is really God. Just because the idea of the universe is 'in' Omniscience, and just because Omnipotence CAN make a universe, doesn't mean the universe ACTUALLY exists.

The Lord seemed to be making a big point of this when He talked to Nicodemus, in John3. Because, He analogizes between PHYSICAL birth, and SPIRITUAL birth, and He's PLAYING on the word SPIRIT, which in both Hebrew AND Greek can also mean, "breath" (ruach, pneuma). So, until there is an EXHALE (this is how my pastor explains the passage), there is no life BEGOTTEN. Big bang. First cry of the baby. [Of course, when you first pull a baby from the mother's womb, the FIRST thing you must do, is CLEAR ITS NOSE so it CAN exhale. (No breathing takes place IN the womb: nostrils are plugged up).] First imputation of Eternal Life by the Holy Spirit into the human spirit HE creates (Titus3:5).

As noted earlier, whereas OT stresses OWNERSHIP (Husband is talking!), so its language on this topic is often POSSESSIVE, the NT's rhetorical style on to this topic is often clinical. So, the Lord uses the very unusual INDICATIVE MOOD with didomi and hoste in John3:16 (my pastor stressed this, L1663). What's so awesome, is that hoste normally takes the (get this!) "infinitive of conceived/intended result". Note that. Infinitives in Greek express PURPOSE, but whether the purpose ACTUALLY came to pass, is a DIFFERENT action. Greek is very precise. Considering the Attic double-accusative of huios and monogeneis (son and uniquely-born, respectively) in the SAME CLAUSE, it's a deliberate play on words to fit the analogy made earlier about how what's born of flesh is flesh, but of Spirit is spirit.

Breath to breath, then, is the definition of life, which both OT and NT say in many other ways (bullets at beginning of this page). No life until independent BREATH. So no spiritual life, until independent SPIRITUAL breath: you aren't saved merely because you UNDERSTAND the Gospel. (See also James 1:13-15, and Gal4:19's GREEK.) That's the BIG POINT the Lord is making, here, via specially-crafted Greek syntax, for a confused-but-positive, Pharisee. So no life, just because purposed. If I purpose to go to work but don't ACTUALLY do it, no work will get done. If I purpose to pay a bill but don't actually do it, the bill remains unpaid. If I even pay the bill by check, but the check doesn't CLEAR MY BANK ACCOUNT, the bill remains UNPAID. Esau cried his eyes out for salvation, but didn't actually BELIEVE, so God DID NOT save Him. (See Heb12:17: you have to see the Greek there. English translations don't show that Esau, for all his crying, 'couldn't find a change-of-mind'. Yeah, how many times haven't we all used that same excuse.] After all, the road to hell IS paved with good intentions.

So, to go from purpose to REALITY, there must be an ACT OF WILL. "Believe in the Lord Jesus" it says in Acts 16:31. Belief is always and ONLY, an act of WILL. Choosing. Yes. Consent. Conceiving the Gospel, doesn't make one born. One must WANT to believe. So, to do that, one must one must first CHANGE THE MIND (metanoeo, has no emotional connotation, so "repent" is a misleading translation) about what the PREVIOUSLY-CONCEIVED Gospel, means. So too, for sin (Jas1:13-15). Being tempted, is not sin. Being tempted, requires the 'conception' of an idea God would not 'touch'. But until the person CHANGES HIS MIND about the temptation and WILLS it, it can't be BORN.

LIFE KEY ==> Only when BORN, is it alive. Faith without works, is dead. Faith in Christ without the Work of the Holy Spirit, is dead. [Why does NO ONE look at the CONTEXT of James 2:18? See, the strawman in v.18 is saying that works WITHOUT faith (doctrine, in context of Chapter 1) is valid. James spends the rest of this 'paragraph' REFUTING the strawman argument. Remember, Judaism was stuck on works. So James starts with DOCTRINE, shemah Yisroel. Which IS WHY Jas2:18ff is BASED ON CHAPTER 1, and ends at 2:26, the Holy Spirit's REGENERATING US. For "faith" in Greek means belief, alright, but MORE OFTEN means WHAT is believed, Bible Doctrine, which is WHY James 1 is ABOUT Doctrine, because James 1:3 is talking about being tested in your BELIEF, which means WHAT you believe, Scripture. Be a DOER of the WORD, see. Heb11:6, Rom10:9-10 (in Greek, English mistranslates v.10's end), and like verses tie in. 1Jn is really critical on this topic too, but he uses an in-fellowship-with-God, out-of-fellowship style. You have to carefully track what is 'in' or 'out', and even though the Greek is often simple, much mistranslation exists. For example, John uses Atticisms, but today's scholars like to forget about that, pretending it's all koine. See Wallace's introductory chapters. But you can still spot mistranslations if you use a lexicon with more punch than abridged Strong's.]

So a thing must be BORN, to be alive, no matter WHAT. Be it a paid bill, a sin, a universe, a believer, a human being, or even a dog. God is consistent, and GOD MUST FIRST WILL life exist. MUST CREATE FIRST, for life to exist. Whether the big bang, the faculty of procreation, the creation of the PERFECT soul (thus only at birth, since body has Adam's sin nature genetics), the creation of the human spirit (which causes salvation -- see Titus3:5). All HIS work. Not our works. For, works without faith [Spirit empowering, Bible Doctrine], are dead, too.

So something which BEGAN by His Hand but AFTERWARDS does something ON ITS OWN, is NOT His work. After all, God is not sin because He KNOWS SIN from Omniscience. Sin is not 'alive' just because its own existence, is IN His Omniscience. So procreation is NOT His work, and therefore He is NOT compromising Righteousness to NOT 'touch' it. So sin is NOT His work, and therefore He is NOT compromising, etc., to not only NOT 'touch' it, but to, WITH CHRIST'S CONTINUING CONSENT, impute and judge those sins ON the Cross. Therefore belief is NOT His Work, for it comes from a soul; but BECAUSE belief is NOT His work, that soul's belief, itself accomplishes NOTHING; but BECAUSE belief is IN CHRIST, He can NOW 'touch' it, since our sins 'touched' Christ (2Cor5:21). So now the Holy Spirit can now 'touch' that belief, and MAKE US SAVED (Titus3:5, again). BORN. AGAIN. BY GOD. Not by anyone or anything else. "For apart from Me, you can do nothing" (Jn15:5).

See how MUCH MORE SENSE MANY VITAL BIBLE DOCTRINES, once you RECOGNIZE there is no soul life in the womb? Most importantly, the reason why there is no SOUL life in the womb has to do with God's ATTRIBUTES AND SOVEREIGNTY, so has nothing to do with whether stupid people have sex out of wedlock. Yet again, let God be proved true, though every FALSE USE OF SCRIPTURE, a lie. To truncate the USE OF SCRIPTURE to just abortion issues, is NEVER right.

However, on that FAR LESS IMPORTANT subject of pregnancy, if a woman is pregnant, GOD SHOULD BE CONSULTED, like Rebekah consulted Him in Genesis, in order to decide what to do. [Badly translated, Gen25:22. No "baby" word IN that verse! Term is "ben", and in Hebrew it's NOT a person on its own. The word means "son of" but in a NAME. No name until BORN, obviously. That's what the b'rith on the 8th day AFTER BIRTH, is for. If you look at v.23, again God's precision shows, emphasizing SEPARATION from the womb, so "nations" (duh) aren't IN the womb, but are talked about AFTER SEPARATION FROM the womb.]

Definitely no state authority should have a right to decide what she should do: Exodus 21:22 makes that clear IN SPADES. It is a PERSONAL matter, because EVERYTHING between God and an individual is a personal matter. Whether family or the father should be involved, is an extension -- personal. For, the minute you cede to the state something PERSONAL, then ALL your personal rights become fair game for state control. Because, in law, you SET A PRECEDENT when you cede something to the state. Check out the history of the US! Liberalism would not have the power grip it does, if we didn't spend decades CEDING to the Federal Government, rights that properly belong to NON-governmental segments of the body politic.

You'll want to check all this out for yourself, of course. And you should. For, the research has RICHES OF UNDERSTANDING ABOUT GOD'S NATURE you can NEVER get from the English. Really, it's like getting BILLIONS of dollars. No.. it's BETTER!

Added reading of interest: you might find DueDisclosure.htm ("Due Disclosure" link in Basics Box of Home Page) helpful, because Bible makes lots of plays on "hupostasis", JOINING. That is, of God TOUCHING a thing, to MAKE it alive, to MAKE it saved, to MAKE it holy, etc. Frankly, what all the atheists miss, is that this HUPOSTASIS (as in, God-man, Heb1:3) is EMBEDDED in every structure in the universe, in life; so is DISPLAYED in everyone, everything, every principle of every secular discipline EVERYWHERE you look, especially in MATH. Ergo, Rom1:20, Eph1, Eph3:15-21, Heb1, (Greek). Not good, that body should exist without God, either! So GOD DOES SOMETHING, not man, to solve the problem!

An archive & consolidation of brainout's YouTube and Vimeo videos. The descriptions are preserved on the pages along with remastered and consolidated videos.

---

This series must demonstrate why the political "prolife" claim is blasphemous, since the prolifers claim Bible support. Bible opposes what prolifers claim; when you examine what the Bible does say, you reluctantly realize the prolife claim is blasphemous.

Now, that sounds like a condemnation. But the truth is, the issue of when life begins is a political football in pulpits and Bible translations for the past five centuries. Only since 1850 has the actual inspired Bible text been widely available to the common man, to check against the centuries of misteaching.

Thus one is tempted to excuse prolifers, because how could they know of the blasphemy, if it's not taught? Well the problem is, a few pastors such as my own, have correctly taught the BIBLE doctrine that human life only begins at birth. So the fault is dual: one, most pastors aren't studying and teaching Scripture from the original-language texts, and two, the students don't care about what Bible really says in those texts. So the politically-correct MIStranslations, have been popular.

But that mistranslation trend is changing, here in the 21st century. Only 30 years ago, there were few Bible translations, which would dare to correctly say the BIBLE doctrine that you are not human until BORN, because at that moment God sovereignly and personally creates your SOUL. But here in 2008, in my BibleWorks software -- which pastors purchase -- 30% of the English translations correctly translate the relevant verses, 10-30% of the time. So a) there is some awareness of the error, and willingness to admit it, but b) the SAME HEBREW PHRASE is mistranslated the majority of the time -- clear proof that political games are being played. The word "word" is always translated the same, so why not "from birth"? Well, you know why...

There are hundreds of these verses in the OT, because God is very adamant on how only HE makes you at BIRTH, never before. Every such verse has the same Hebrew phrases, so they should be translated the same way, each time. But they are not. For when "womb" is in a verse, apparently the translating committees for the Bible in question, get nervous. Less nervous today than 30 years ago, but still enough to cause confusion.

GIST: God makes you a "you" at birth, and no one else makes you BUT Him. That's the Bible's constant refrain, and it demonstrates His Absolute Sovereign Love. So the Bible's perspective isn't about abortion, but about God's Personal Creative Act of making YOU at birth. Obviously, though, since that is true, then a) you cannot be evolved, and b) fetal tissue is not human UNTIL born, because c) what makes that tissue HUMAN, is a SOUL God creates.

So in this video series, we'll go through these verses, so you can see for yourself what BIBLE says, versus the mistranslations. It will be a slog to go through all the verses. You will end up learning some Hebrew and Greek as a result: the words are not hard to learn, and will be repeated hundreds of times, so you will find the process rather easy. But you'll have to go through all the videos. And ask GOD, about what you are learning.

I already did some webpages on this topic, but they need to be redone; the videos will go into much more detail than the webpages, since in the pages I only categorize the verses; but the videos will show them. The header webpage for these, is Caveat4.htm.

I'm adopted, so obviously I'm not pro-abortion. In fact, the problem here is that Christians are aborting the Word, and making Christianity into a mockery, giving yet more cause for people to hate God and the Bible, Romans 2 indictment. Upshot of the videos will be to demonstrate that the BIBLICAL position is to be pro-GOD's choice, and leave Caesar out of it.

---

Talk 2any Jew/reader of Aramaic 2verify hara means BE PREGNANT, not 'conceive'+read Num11:12, Job15:35,Ps7:14,Isa33:11,59:4,13

Now think: a sin isn't a sin until BORN. To CONCEIVE of it, as noted above, is but temptation.

Sheesh. Prolifers really don't know Bible at all, and spit on God by lying against His Word.

A for "ALERTS". Certain concepts and Bible verses even in translation should ALERT you to the fact that the "prolife" position blasphemes God.

1. Concepts: just a few of these are listed, to aid one's thinking. As you think them over, you'll realize many other ideas alert you to the fact that there is no soul life in a womb.
1. No baby breathes in a womb. If it's not breathing, it's not alive. The first breath taken is outside the womb, when the fetus' nostrils are cleared -- for they are plugged up, in a womb. We don't consider a fetal kangaroo or kitten to be alive until born, and even have the phrase, "born dead" -- taken from the Bible, by the way -- so why suddenly are humans considered alive in utero? Oh, it's an old pagan myth. More about that, will be in "B", below.
2. Life is an INDEPENDENCE. Death is not. Death occurs when the soul leaves the body. Everyone knows that. So until there is a soul IN a body, it's not alive -- separation of soul and body is the definition of death. So prior to birth, no soul either. Hence the fetal tissue is not alive. It is developing into life, but until birth is not itself alive.
3. God would be a sadist to put a soul in a womb, since then all the developing fetal parts, would be felt by a conscious soul, trapped in there, with no or insufficient brain to process any will. (The brain is the last to develop, as the skeletal cranial cavity is not hardened enough until birth, so that the fetus can exit the birth canal.)
4. God would be a murderer, since every year thousands of spontaneous abortions occur, especially in developing countries, owing to poor nutrition, inherited disease, and other factors.
5. Christ could not stay sinless if His Soul existed inside a womb, so there would be no salvation if soul life was in a womb. In order to stay sinless, He has to have a BRAIN, which can process His WILL as a human being, and He has to have INDEPENDENCE. In the womb, no fetus has independence; it is at the beck and call of the mother's emotions and will. So Christ could not stay sinless, as when Mary sinned, it would pass onto Him, as He'd have no independent ability to resist it. (Hopefully you know that Mary was not sinless; Catholic Church made up that lie hundreds of years later; Bible records her as sinning, and even she calls herself a sinner in the Magnificat. See my "Mary Immaculate Blooper" video.)
6. Bible doesn't call abortion murder, and there have never been civil laws making it murder, until the last 50 years or so. Accordingly, have all the past generations been remiss, not to make a law which prolifers now attempt? Or are the prolifers, in error? When you see Exodus 21:22 in 2d., below, you'll realize why no one in the past tried to make it a civil law for a nation. So then the prolifers, are the ones not reading their Bibles. Catholic Church has always taught against abortion, but it wasn't a law. Yeah, and the Catholic Church correctly translated Exodus 21:22 in its Bibles (covered below).
7. Now, if it's true (and it is) that you're not human until born, then a MOTHER who might die if she gives birth, is being MURDERED if the fetus is given precedence over the mother. Because, she is alive and HAS a soul. Jewish rabbis will counsel, therefore, that you give precedence to the mother. Ask a rabbi, see for yourself. More on this will be said in "B." section, below.
2. Bald Bible verses even in translation: again, these are only a few obvious ones. You'll think of many others, as you go through your concordance on the key words, and think over what the ones below, signify. The videos will cover these, but you can just read them even in most translations, and see the import.
1. Genesis 1:26-27. God decrees that "human" means to be made in God's Image, and God is IMmaterial. So is the SOUL. Therefore you cannot be evolved, since God personally makes you at birth. This is demonstrated in the Genesis video Episode 6c, but you don't even need to see it, just look at any Bible.
2. Genesis 2:7. Adam doesn't become ALIVE, until God BREATHES LIVES (literal Hebrew, "hayyim") into his NOSTRILS, which means AFTER the body is formed. All this is demonstrated in the Genesis videos, Episodes 6c through the end of 7 for the Hebrew, but even though the English verses mistranslate the PLURAL LIVES as singular "living" or "life", you still can see the ORDER -- body first, and only AFTERwards, is the soul made.
3. Genesis 25:22. There, Rebekah ASKS GOD what to do about her pregnancy. Model of what we should do. Asking God, not Caesar, to adjudicate the matter...
4. Exodus 21:22. There, even in translation, you can tell it's a hypothetical court case due to the woman miscarrying, as a result of her trying to stop a fight between her husband and some other person. Bible makes the distinction between whether only the fetus is miscarried (lol the politically-correct Bible translations have problem with that, but even the Douhay-Rheims CATHOLIC Bible correctly translates it as "miscarry"). Or, whether the woman herself is harmed (verse 23). If the latter, it's a CRIMINAL issue for the courts. If only the fetus miscarries, it's NOT criminal, but any damage assessed is to be determined by the woman and her husband. So it's NOT murder, if the fetus aborts, get it?

On this verse, the following English Bibles correctly translate, per my BibleWorks collection: NIV/NIB, but only in the note (if your NIV is annotated), "or she has a miscarriage". NASB 1977 (but not later), Douhay-Rheims 1610 (Catholic Bible), Bible in Basic English, New American Bible, New Jerusalem Bible, Revised Standard 1989 and 1952, 1985 Jewish Publication Society Tanakh. By the way, the Latin Online Vulgate seems to get it right, too. Non-English Bibles tend to copy whatever English Bible they used as a translation device, rather than going by the original-language texts (i.e., French Bible Jerusalen copies from the English Jerusalem Bible). By contrast, check out the Spanish Reina-Valera (1909, 1960 and 1989, 1995, editions are in my BibleWorks collection) -- it gets the translation right.

5. For, it's Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God, what is God's. This refrain is famous, we all know it, yet we don't think about what it means. Christ gave it as a principle, in Matt22:21, Mark 12:17, Luke 20:25 -- three Gospels record it, to stress its importance. Paul covers the same doctrine at length in 1Cor6 (why Christians shouldn't sue each other), 1Tim2, Romans 13-14. Tie-in OT doctrine is the warning not to go to Egypt, and "cursed is the man who makes his flesh, his strength".
6. Ecclesiastes 12:7 -- body returns to the earth, but the soul returns to God. Only God gives life. So you cannot be alive in the womb, because biological life is not from God, but produced intermediately via pregnancy.
7. "Time to be born, time to die", Ecc 3:2. So conception isn't birth.
8. Bible reckons life starting at birth and then ending at death, pan-Bible. You don't see Genesis 5 say, for example, "And Adam caused the CONCEPTION of Seth", etc. Rather, you see Seth's BIRTH being given as the beginning of his LIFE. Everywhere in Bible, the beginning of a person is stated as his BIRTH.
9. "Born again", John 3, Titus 3:5. Conceiving the Gospel, doesn't save you.
10. Sin doesn't exist until BORN -- Job 15:35, Psalm 7:14, Isaiah 33:1, 59:4, James 1:15. This should be obvious. Temptation is merely the CONCEPTION of sin, but until you say yes to the temptation, you've not sinned. Man's biology is tainted in Adam, Romans 5:12, 1Cor15:22. So therefore NO soul is in the womb, since there would be no ability to resist temptation from the mother. Again, Christ's Soul couldn't stay sinless if He were trapped in a womb, since every human being BUT Him, is born in fallen Adam, ibid.



B for "Biology" befuddling us. Biological life has been deemed human life by pagan cultures, and THAT is where we get the idea of life being in the womb.

1. Pagan cultures attributed magic properties to blood, to the heart, to the head. For example, if you wanted to gain your enemy's brains, you ate his brains; his courage, you ate his heart; his strength, you ate the body part you wanted to make strong. Royalty was given magic blood properties, so it became important that a son from the loins of the king father, be ruling. All these magical ideas didn't make the distinction that to be human was strictly an immaterial act by God, since God was rejected. You can look up any ancient culture you like on the internet, and find these biology-magic ideas in it. So when a fetus was in a womb, it was attributed as being alive.
2. Under the Mosaic Law, it was never said that a fetus was human, but rabbis in the Talmud began to consider that 40 days after conception, "life" was in the womb. So they would counsel against abortion. After all, God might want to make that fetus come to term, so we shouldn't mess with God's Will. Ask any rabbi today, and you should get an answer similar to the one you just read. So it was an application of Genesis 25:22 and other verses -- the idea being, GOD should decide if a fetus is to be born -- but not actually a Bible doctrine, itself. Not a bad application, though, huh...
3. Catholic Church developed and grew, by accommodating many pagan beliefs. The goal was to get people to believe in Christ and into the 'fold' of 'mother church', and then hopefully the pagan beliefs would diminish over time. So if people believed that a fetus was alive, well and good. Moreover, Catholic Church had to adopt some of the paganism, to claim that Mary was Immaculate -- see my "Mary Immaculate Blooper" video, because it couldn't explain the Virgin Pregnancy. But precisely BECAUSE Christ wouldn't be Christ until BORN, His Body could be conceived and developed in a womb by means of the Holy Spirit, rather than tainted-in-Adam, human sperm. But they didn't understand all that back then. Now, hundreds of years later, it's too late, I guess, to admit the error.
4. Modern science also erroneously thinks that human life is strictly biological, having no stomach to admit the IMmaterial nature of thought. Synapses can only be read for electrical impulses; when you cut the halves of the brain or a patient has a stroke, you can tell what parts of the brain affect what sorts of reasoning, memory, emotion, stimuli -- but you cannot read the actual thoughts, themselves. So man today is just as dumb as the pagans, considering himself as Feuerbach quipped, "man is mass in motion, without a soul". This too, contributes to the lie that humanness is strictly biological, so of course a fetus in the womb, would be considered alive.
5. Evolution hangs on the claim that human life is strictly biological, so that's why it looks at similar arms and legs of monkeys, and thinks we came from them.
6. It's natural to consider a POTENTIAL life as alive. Ask any mother when the fetus kicks. :)



C for Corrupted Bible translations. These result from "A" and "B".

1. Because we ignore the common-sense and Bible warnings in "A", and because we naturally buy into "B", especially since respectable people buy into it, we do "C", corrupt Living Word into dead words. The videos will cover most of these mistranslations, so you see the pattern. It's really bald, how the Bible is mistranslated. Proverbial hand in the cookie jar, like the Vulgate masking the difference between Greek petros and Petra, to pretend that Peter instead of Christ, is the head of the Church -- to pass off its pope myth as valid. (See my "Petros Life" and "Rock is Christ" videos on that; videos walk you through the Bible verses in Hebrew, Greek, Latin and English.)
2. Political-correctness is the objective of REVERSING what Bible says, in the translation of "womb" verses. Again, 30 years ago Bible mistranslation was even worse than today. Especially, the Hebrew phrase "mi beten" and "me rechem" are both mistranslated "from the womb", when instead the Hebrew preposition "min" stresses SEPARATION FROM the object. So "separated from the womb", "away from the womb", "beyond the womb" should always be the translation of that Hebrew. Hebrew preposition "min" is used thousands of times in the OT, and always has a birthing connotation. The stress on separation is important, for example, to understanding why God begins to number the days of Adam, in Genesis 3:22. Isaiah 53 uses the preposition to stress Christ's Humanity and how He was yet beyond-human at the same time, by repeating the preposition and by repeating its SOUND. Scholars know this well, as do pastors. What pastor doesn't stress the BEYOND-HUMAN torture Christ went through, when covering Isaiah 52:14? "Beyond" is Hebrew preposition "min". Dr. Saenz-Badillos of the University of Madrid wrote a book on A History of the Hebrew Language; he covers how "min" developed as a separative, partitive preposition; I got my copy at Amazon. You can also look up "min" in TWOT lexicon (Theological Workbook of the Old Testament), which is also online (as well as in BibleWorks), to see this essential meaning.

   So it's bald politics, to reverse "min" in "womb" verses, by clever truncation to "from the womb": which in English, means from INSIDE. Proper translation should be, "from birth". It will take many videos to go through all these verses.

   Again, today more Bible translations correctly say "from birth" than was true in yesteryear. For example, in a simple string search on "from birth" in the most popular English Bibles, the Hebrew phrase "mi beten" is properly translated 10-30% of the time as "from birth" in NIV/NIB, New Living Translation, Revised Standard, Bible in Basic English, Geneva 1599 Bible, Webster 1833, New American Standard, English Standard Version, 1917 Jewish Publication Society Tanakh, New Jerusalem Bible, even New King James. Compare Psalm 71:6 in different Bibles, to see something of the variance, here. It's typical of the dispersion of translations in the other verses using the very same Hebrew phrase.

   Think about that. The EXACT SAME HEBREW PHRASE, "mi beten" -- literally, "beyond the womb", "separated from the womb", "outside the womb" -- is used well over 16 times in the OT (beten is used a total of 73 times, but not all reference the womb). So then it always means the same thing, as it's a literal physical expression of BIRTH. So then why isn't it always translated the same way? Why sometimes and not others, since in the context the meaning is always the same? After all, you are born or are not. There's no "semantic range", no gray area of interpretation, here.

   A synonym for "beten" in Bible is Hebrew "rechem", which also means "womb". There are at least 12 of these verses (76 total, but not all reference the womb); included among them, is the "womb to tomb" wish of Job (Job 3:11, 10:18), demonstrating that Job wasn't alive until born -- and wishing he'd immediately DIED after birth. In this group is the always-misread Jeremiah 1:5, people forgetting that Omniscient God knows someone before he exists, so instead of reading THAT correctly, they misuse the verse to claim Jeremiah WAS Jeremiah "in" the womb.

   Then there are thousands of birthing references which just use the Hebrew "min", or synonyms, to show when human life begins. Many of these are wordplay, so instead of being translated "born", they are translated in other ways. So of course the videos will have to cover at least some of these other instances, as well; thus you can see the pattern.

3. So you miss the many verses where God says HE makes you a "you", at birth. This is the main theme in the Bible regarding birth, that you're not alive until God makes you alive. So, then you need to be re-born, spiritually, which God alone also makes. Series' videos will cover these verses. God's Sovereign SELECTION of your existence, upfront and personal at birth, is an important doctrine to know. Unbelievers are also chosen to exist; God wants NO one to go to hell, 2Pet3:9. But you can't know all that, if you don't know that God personally makes you a you AT birth, huh...
4. Tie-in verses to the difference between biological life and soul life, therefore must be covered. Since most of Christendom is very confused about man's essential TRI-partite nature when saved, versus his DUAL nature if unsaved (never mind clear passages like Hebrews 4 and 1Cor2), videos on this topic are needed. These will be the hardest videos to do, as so few pastors even teach the tri-partite nature of man: human spirit is life/relationship with God, soul life is for other souled creation (humans, and in eternity, angels), and biological life is a kind of house you live in.
5. Special passages in Job, Psalms, the prophets, Paul, James, and the Lord's statements in the Gospels, will get special videos. These passages use the fact that you are not human until born, to express other doctrines or appreciation. For example, Christ doesn't say you must be conceived again to be saved, in John 3; because, conception is not life. James says that sin has to be born, too. Paul likens our current status to a fetus, waiting to BE born, in Romans 8 and elsewhere. Job wishes he'd never been born -- "from womb to tomb", as my pastor quipped, when exegeting Job. David marvels that God would decree his birth, noting that his body is only a dead house, in Psalm 139 -- which of course is horribly mistranslated, see my "Don't Abort My Word". Some of the prophets also have special passages on the topic. Videos will cover some of them, enough to convey the pattern of Bible exposition.
6. So-called "problem passages", like Luke 1:15 and Elizabeth's phrasing of the 'baby leapt' will get videos, too. Frankly, once you see the previous videos, you'll understand most of these passages are not problems. The problems, are the people eisegeting them. ("Eisegesis" is a fancy term for fancying something in Bible, which isn't there.)



D for Deus Decides.

1. At root, the issue of when you become a you, is solely a matter of Sovereign Divine Decision. After all, the soul lives forever and therefore God has been 'listening' to it since eternity past. Every breath you take is courtesy of God, for He holds everything together; there is no automatic pilot. Your free existence and free will must be ordained, or you never will exist in the first place. Lots of Bible verses on this, and some of them -- enough to establish the rhetorical pattern the Bible uses -- will be covered in the videos. Really, this is the heart of the issue: GOD must decide. What makes the prolife position blasphemous is that prolifers want to allocate that role to Caesar.
2. It's a juridical issue, too: a fetus is not alive, so not guilty of anything, even though tainted in its biology, with Adam's sin. That's why it must be BORN: if born, it BECOMES a juridical issue, will God make it alive, or not? Just as in Genesis 2:7, God could have stopped at forming Adam's body. In which case, Adam wouldn't have ever become "Adam" (clever wordplay, since adamah means earth, so the Earth Man made out of the Earth).
3. So the issue for us, is to be pro- God's Choice. If a woman loses a fetus, then it was God's Choice that the fetus never come to term. Trust God to have good reasons for that, since HE has to live with the decision since eternity past. If a woman is sterile, same thing. If a woman is pregnant but doesn't want to be, well -- what does God think about that? Of course, the unbeliever doesn't ask the question, but like Rebekah did in Genesis 25:22, we Christians sure should.



E for Election Time: what to do with this information?

1. Talk to God, obviously. Life comes from God, so God has the right to say if a fetus will be a human being.
2. Abortion is not murder, because one has to be a human being, alive, to be murdered; in a womb, there is no life yet, whether animal or human.
3. So don't campaign for Federal Laws to make abortion murder. That's giving to Caesar, what is God's; it's also a lie against the Bible which says abortion is NOT murder. Were abortion murder, then the Mosaic Law would have verses saying so. Yet rather, you have Exodus 21:22, as mentioned in "B", above.
4. So don't conclude that Bible is pro-abortion, either.
5. Best of all, learn how God intimately chooses your own existence, whether you ever believed in Christ or not. For the soul was ransomed by Christ, and lives forever. Your choice, WHERE that forever-life after this body ends, will be.

BIBLE says you're not human until BORN, when GOD (not your biology), creates your soul and gives your body, its first BREATH. No one but God is the author of life. This is the root reason how salvation could be accomplished, and why it is permanent. Learn when life begins, or you will never understand or feel secure about, your salvation.

To keep believers unsettled, Satan authored the prolife movement about 30+ years ago. It is sourced in the pagan myth that biology is magical. Sadly, Christians practice that same pagan belief, totally oblivious to what Bible actually says. Their punishment is delusion.

Yet some pastors (like mine) have been proving for YEARS that soul life is not imputed until birth. But the old Catholic heresy (to make Mary sinless) that life begins at conception, still lingers.

By the time you go through all the videos in this series -- most of which, due to length, are LINKS in the video descriptions -- you'll see that proof from Bible for yourself.

The extensive exegesis will become easy to understand, as you'll see it onscreen from BibleWorks.

Political coverup governs 'womb' verses: they are reverse-translated.

So prolifers politick on abortion, showing their Rev 17 'bent'. Thus you you know they are satanic, too.

---

PB1a The Prolife Blasphemy Series (PB)

Prolife Blasphemy series, intro. I AM ADOPTED. These videos do not advocate abortion, but rather demonstrate what BIBLE says: that you are NOT HUMAN until born, because there is NO SOUL LIFE in the womb. Over 500 verses in Bible to go through, so this video series will take over years to finish. Proof before your eyes in the original-language Bible texts, will end up being the major focus, because you should see the proof in Bible for yourself; but the first group of videos are introductory.

See links below for sample Word searches which demonstrate the Bible doctrine of God's Choice. You'll need a thesaurus so you can search Bible on the synonyms of these keyverbs.

• 6-page Word doc Series Summary: ProlifeBlasphemy.doc
• View whole series: Caveat4.htm
• View the Genesis videos, beginning at Episode 6c, here: SatStrat2.htm#GenesisVids. The Prolife Blasphemy videos are there also, so you don't have to switch pages.
• That Caveat4 page has more Bible info on why prolife is anti-Biblical. Demonstration that it's even satanic, is in SatTacExamp.htm#GeniusExpo

Future videos in this series will demonstrate the webpage content via Bible.

Associated Blog entry, which contains all the above links:

• brainout360oldBlogDownload.htm
• Site I found on what Bible says re Exo21:22, unrelated to me: https://www.libchrist.com/other/abortion/exodus.html
• The Rock is Christ and Petros Lie video series are both in this webpage which explains why the office of 'pope' is a myth also: PopeMyth.htm.

Lies must be accounted, as must truth. The purpose is NOT to condemn, but to disclose. We are all mistaken on things, so the best way to learn how to correct failures in the SELF, is to witness them in others. That's what they teach you at West Point. How much more important to know, for the Christian Soldier?

---

PB2c Prolife Proved Satanic

Here we see why prolifers can't read Bible and thus politicize abortion. We are all pawns for Satan & Co. Okay, so how to get out of that? Surely God is not PRO-abortion, is He?

CORRECTION: at about 4 minutes, I said Rev was written in 96AD, which is the commonly-taught WRONG answer. I didn't know the RIGHT answer until 2015, when I learned the Bible METERS its text, with one of the meter functions being a DATELINE. John DATELINES Rev1 and 17 as 88 AD. Which better fits the facts we now know, about Domitian.

---

PB2b Prolife Disproved by 'breath' verses

What a surprise: even English Bible translations quickly prove Prolife a lie: all I had to do was search on "breath" in English Bibles. For Bible says even in translation, that you're not alive until and unless you are BREATHING.

That's good, because if a fetus WAS alive, it would be SCREAMING. Couldn't be more obvious, since a fetus has its NOSTRILS plugged, whether animal fetus, or human.

Search also on "breathed", "breathing", "wind", "spirit" -- for the latter two words are often mistranslations of "breathe". See for yourself, even in any translation you care to pick.

False doctrine always maligns God, glorifies man, is the product of appallingly poor Bible 'scholarship', and ALWAYS FAILS COMMON SENSE. What could be more common-sense, but that to be alive, you must be BREATHING?

---

PB2a Prolife Disproved by 'breath' verses

Not breathing? NOT ALIVE, says Bible. No fetus of any kind, animal or human, breathes. Hundreds of verses in Bible tell you that aliveness means BREATHING. Here, we see a deft 7 verses which also show you how animals only have ONE type of life (biological) versus man, who has MULTIPLE lives required, in order to even be alive.

How embarrassing. Bible says you're not alive until breathing. No fetus breathes. No animal fetus, no human fetus. So no fetus is alive. So no fetus is breathing in any womb of ANY kind. Hence the prolife claim is completely shattered, by the very Bible the prolifers claim supports their cause.

---

PB3a Be Pro GOD's Choice

The prolife movement is almost the greatest among the many Christian blasphemies against God since Church began. So again, there's no call for one Christian sect to call another evil: for the EXTREME evil of prolife spans all Christian denominations. Yeah, Satan dupes us all; the COMMON SENSE "if it's not breathing, it's not alive" is foreign to us. So it's impossible to be 'prolife' defined by Christians, and spiritual, at the same time. No breath in us, Psalm 135:17. What hypocrites we are.

NOTE: my videos aren't in blip.tv anymore. They don't want Christians, so cancelled my videos. But they are here and in vimeo, as noted in the video description, and in the next video. Do the Word searches, cuz there are HUNDREDS of verses on this topic of how YOU ARE NOT YOU UNTIL GOD MAKES YOU AT BIRTH, GIVING YOU YOUR FIRST BREATH. Many pastors know this, too. Mine did. But those who want political power and money, won't teach Bible properly.

---

PB3b Prolife Blasphemy Series (PB) Download 'album'

This video covers three things:

1. The promised download vids in the Prolife Blasphemy series, are now off bliptv, and on Vimeo, here: http://vimeo.com/album/2589297.
2. How to make a displayed webpage more readable.
3. Short reminder about how Prolife is blasphemous, and why. I will be making a lot more videos proving that fact FROM BIBLE DIRECTLY, but the videos will be in Vimeo, in the displayed album (see #1 above for the link). For the vids are much clearer in Vimeo (which specializes in HD), than Youtube. And, you can download them without special addins or other hassle. But in Youtube, when new vids are posted to Vimeo, I'll make a short announcing video in Youtube.

Hopefully that will enable me to avoid the trolls. For in Vimeo, if you make stupid or nasty remarks, or remarks full of swear words, I will block you. The Vimeo community is not tolerant of that stuff, so I can't afford to be. If you want to criticise me, fine: do it without swear words, do it WITH substance, and if you're in the mood, do it creatively. Criticism, I love. WILLFUL stupidity, I will no longer tolerate.

Someday when I have time, I'll move the vimeo videos to Youtube. Vimeo is now being snarky, too. But I pay them for the service, and not until I move all the vids to Youtube, will the vimeo subscription, end.

---

PB4a Isa46:3 and "womb" verses

Here, we see proof that Bible is politically mistranslated to hide its truth that NO SOUL is in the womb. There are many more verses to cover, but Isaiah 46:3 is a handy proof of the politicking. One part of the verse's truth that you aren't human until born is covered up, and the other part isn't covered up. Ooops! Someone forgot to cover it ALL up!

So here in Episode 4, we see the main Bible Hebrew & Greek words for "womb"; and, Bible's SEPARATIVE preposition min (Hebrew) & ek (Greek). These words signify NO SOUL LIFE UNTIL BIRTH. You'll see the lexicons in BibleWorks (software which pastors use), to prove the meaning of the words. So this video is easy, and lays the foundation for the later ones on the mistranslation of verses with the same words in them.

Suggest you also listen to John MacArthur explain the preposition ek as SEPARATIST when he talks about why the Rapture precedes Trib, in the following video: • Video. Listen for "terew ek", at the video's 7:49 (he's citing Rev3:10, beginning at 6:42 in the video). So obviously this SEPARATIST meaning is well known, so no 'scholar' or 'teacher' should ever teach that there is soul life in any womb. No excuse.

In fact, there are hundreds of verses using these prepositions, to stress how only GOD makes you a "you" at BIRTH, not conception; famously, Isaiah 53 uses the preposition to stress how Christ BIRTHS our salvation on the Cross, beginning at Isa52:14. For Bible's perspective is Ownership, GOD as the Sole Originator of Life: principle that God Personally selects you to BECOME a human being at birth. So scratch evolution, for your soul is made directly BY God; scratch goofy Calvinism's claim that God doesn't use His Foreknowledge, since Every Human Being is Selected to Exist by God, Personally At Birth.

That's the Bible's focus. Not, abortion. Hence subsequent Episodes will display the other "womb" verses, to further document that focus. Again, I'm adopted, so I don't advocate abortion. But it's not murder, because No Soul LIfe Exists Until God Personally Creates It At Birth. See for yourself, from the live Bible words.

---

PB5a Psalm139:16 proves Prolifers Carnal

Psalm 139 is one of the most-mistranslated chapters in Bible. Verse 16, however, is often correctly translated, and even Strong's weak lexicon correctly shows that a 'golem' -- Hebrew word for anything still in the womb, especially in the embryo stage -- is what David is talking about. That, while he was IN the womb, none of his ordained-by-God 'days', YET EXISTED.

Can't be more obvious that David is saying -- as does the rest of Bible -- that YOU are not a YOU until you are BORN.

Just as, sin isn't sin until it's born, James 1:15. Just as, conceiving the Gospel doesn't save you, John 3:3-7,16, Romans 10:10 (mouthing didn't save the Jews, BELIEVING was needed).

Later videos will show the full corrected translation of Psalm 139 -- you will be shocked at how the Bible is aborted, in translation. So if you can't wait for the videos, search on 'Don't Abort My Word' in NoWombLife.htm. The interim corrected translation of verses 11-16, is there.

It's really important to understand that what constitutes 'human', is immaterial. That's why you are not evolved, but directly and personally created by God AT BIRTH, pattern of Genesis 2:7 (see my Genesis video series on that verse, at SatStrat2.htm#GenesisVids).

That's also why your salvation cannot be lost, and MUST be permanent: because, the real you is your SOUL, and it lives forever -- somewhere. Where, is determined by whether you ever once believed in Christ. If yes, you go to heaven. Since your soul cannot die, you cannot lose your salvation, either.

Thirdly, your spiritual life is lived IN your soul, not in your body. Your body is tainted with Adam's sin nature. It dies, but you do not. So to be spiritual, you must learn and live on Bible, since a SOUL lives on INSTRUCTION.

Okay, but what about abortion? Does that mean you just run out and get one? No, it means you run to GOD and ask HIM for HIS CHOICE in the matter, since you don't know if He WANTS that fetus to come to term so He can CREATE a soul for it. See, abortion is God's Choice, never Caesar's, Exodus 21:22. Because, the real you IS your soul, and lives forever.

---

PB5b Pagan Origin of Prolife (Bowel!) Movement

Prolifers, like evolutionists and pagans before them, assign a magical property to human biology, as if the biology, were itself life. Bible spends a lot of time, starting in Genesis 2:7, refuting that pagan notion. God says HE ALONE is the author of your humanity, which is your SOUL, which HE MAKES at birth. There are hundreds of verses on this topic, as paganism was widespread during the writing of Scripture. In this video series, I've already provided about 100 of the verses within the videos, and in their description links to videos too long to post in Youtube.

But the prolifer is just as irrational, evil, and unbelieving as any pagan, wanting to assign to reflex motility, a magical property of life. Thus he is like a dog returning to its vomit, per 2Peter 2:17-22 -- you were an unbeliever, but now as a carnal Christian, you go back to pagan ideas.

So of course no prolifer can read the many Bible verses already provided in this Prolife Blasphemy series, won't take the time to actually STUDY the issue. Pity but do not imitate them. They will be very embarrassed at the Bema for trampling the Word of God underfoot, ABORTING it, Hebrews 10:29 (in context from 10:1, especially verses 5, 15-17).

---

PB5c Job 10:19 proves Prolifers Carnal

How embarrassing, that Prolifers can't even read Bible when it's well translated and says YOU DON'T EXIST in the womb! Here, the verse is Job 10:19, and even the KJV gets it right!

My pastor taught this verse, taught for over 40 years that there is no soul life in the womb because ONLY GOD CREATES THE SOUL AND HE DOES IT AT BIRTH. Now, if you want to know more about that, you are free to order lessons without anyone asking you for money, at rbthieme.org. I'm not allowed to upload the lessons, sorry. (Too many people have tried to MAKE money off what he teaches, so they have to seal the teaching with copyright protection.)

His Job lessons are in 1985 Ephesians (Series number 412?), lessons 249-266.

---

PB5d Hebrews 10:5 proves Prolifers, Pagan

Your BODY is not you. It was PREPARED for you though, as this verse proves. 'Prepared' really means first healed and then constructed, due to Adam's sin.

In Christ's case, first Mary's sin-tainted 23 chromosomes had to be 'healed' via meiosis and polar body (a natural biological process); but then the Holy Spirit created an added 23 perfect chromosomes, and added them (rather than the natural process of sperm and egg). THAT is 'the immaculate conception', and it's purely biological. A house being prepared, just like David explains in Psalm 139:13.

Prepared for. NOT, the real you. NOT, alive. Rather, an organic machine. For YOU, are a SOUL. Made alive by God at birth, just as Christ here supernaturally exclaims when He is BORN, quoting from Psalm 40:6 in the LXX.

All Bibles translate this verse fairly well. So there is no excuse for believing you are a you, until BORN.

---

PB5e Hebrews 10:5 proves Prolifers, Pagan

This Episode covers how Psalm 40:6 is quoted by Christ, at birth (supernaturally, since no baby can talk), from the LXX. (So here again we see that the KJVO who claim the LXX was invented in the 3rd century AD by Origen, mean to trash the New Testament, too.)

---

PB6a Psalm 139:13 proves Prolifers, Liars

How embarrassing, that prolifers must lie about the Hebrew and Greek of Psalm 139:13, to advance their claim of life in the womb. You'll see proof of the lie in two translations. Oddly enough, the KJV is NOT one of the liars! Of course, the saddest thing is the layman can't know that Psalm 139:13 was deliberately mistranslated to cover up what God's saying: HE ORDERED YOUR COVERING HOUSE, aka the BODY. So notice Satan's punning: God's WORD is covered up in a verse about your covering!

Satan makes many puns like this in Bible mistranslations. For example, in order to denounce God in translation, he takes Genesis 3:11's nagadth, which means to denounce, and has it mistranslated, 'tell', making it look like God didn't 'tell' Adam and the woman they were naked! (My pastor had a lot of fun explaining that one, in his 1977 Genesis series.)

I like to collect satanic mistranslation puns. There are hundreds of them. He does the same thing with the original (and translated) text of the Koran, and Book of Mormon -- STILL punning on the Bible! One day I'll put a large sampling of them all in new video series, but not right now!

---

PB6c Psalm 139:13 proves Prolifers, Liars

Corrected translation of Psalm 139:13 showing David's wordplay on the Jewish holiday of Succoth (Booths) = HOUSE = BODY = WILDERNESS = pregnancy. David now of course is OUTSIDE the womb, so is walking INSIDE his house, in the 'wilderness' of this life, so it's very witty. Wait until you see verse 17!

---

PB6e Psalm 139:14's Hebrew exposes Prolife Political PALAver

This Episode shows the anatomy of a Reformation mistranslation becoming a political football, four centuries later. A simple confusion over two Hebrew verbs which sound alike, coupled with the coverup mistranslation in Psalm 139:13, render the much-beloved Psalm 139:14, a political hot potato. So of course the gorgeous meaning of David's tying his situation to God's Works in EGYPT, is covered up in favor of the goofy idea that the fetus is referenced. LOL Satan misses no chance to 'cover' the naked Word of God!

---

PB6c Psalm 139:13 proves Prolifers, Liars

Prolife Blasphemy Series. Corrected translation of Psalm 139:13 showing David's wordplay on the Jewish holiday of Succoth (Booths) = HOUSE = BODY = WILDERNESS = pregnancy. David now of course is OUTSIDE the womb, so is walking INSIDE his house, in the 'wilderness' of this life, so it's very witty. Wait until you see verse 17! See descriptions to 6a and 6d for more info.

---

PB6d Psalm 139's aborted in translation!

This is a Messianic marching song, to encourage the soldiers to remember their place in history. It is an 'answer' to the Song of Moses in Deut 32, especially Deut 32:8. So it is NOT about abortion politics, okay? Messiah's Coming has been aborted from the translations!

To show all that, I have to retranslate the entire Psalm to show its Hebrew marching cadence. Along the way, you'll see that many of the words in the Psalm relate to specialized PROPHETIC CONCEPTS in the Mosaic Law forecasting the birth of MESSIAH, and especially, the 2Sam7 promise to David.

So it has ZERO to do with today's abortion issues, except for the wonder that God could have 'aborted' the prophecy of Messiah, given Israel's unfaithfulness! So this video merely introduces the marching quality of the Hebrew, etc. Future videos will back up the claims made. It will take awhile to make them, perhaps six months or more.

---

PB7a Psalm 139:15, Messiah's Womb

You were never in your mother's womb, but you were always in Messiah's womb, as this verse proves.

So this is an anti-abortion verse, but.. which type of abortion?

David's amazed that God decreed his EXISTENCE. In short, David didn't exist, and apart from God's Decree, would never exist. So God could have ABORTED David, before he even began; could have aborted him, post-death. But instead, saved him, knitting him in MESSIAH's womb. Yes, knitting, for the verb raqam here is the same verb as used for making the Temple veil. Yes, Messiah's womb, for the noun seter is a famous Psalm term for God as Hiding Place.

All this is aborted from the translation, of course, in favor of pagan politics giving Caesar some right to determine life! See what SEWAGE the prolife movement is, aborting the SALVATION meaning of this verse?

---

PB7b Psalm 139:15, Messiah's Womb

For those of you in seminary, etc.: do a search on the ROOT for each Hebrew word, pan-OT, so you can see how Bible uses each word, especially for kahad and seter, to see the semantic range. Then, focus on how the words apply to David during his life, and how he uses them in the other Psalms. For Isaiah 53 specially keys off DAVID's use of the words in Psalm 139:15, esp. in Isa52:13 (yaskil, meod), 52:14 (toaro), 53:2 (toar), 3 (m'seter),6 (nirp'lanu),11 (beda'ato), 12 (tahat). Really, Isaiah keys off all of Psalm 139:13-17. I didn't know that until just looking at the Psalm, so my Isaiah 53 videos don't reference it. Yet.

It might be some months before I can make more videos on Psalm 139:15's Hebrew words.

Gist of the verse: You were never in your mother's womb, but you were always in Messiah's womb, as this verse proves.

So this is an anti-abortion verse, but.. which type of abortion?

David's amazed that God decreed his EXISTENCE. In short, David didn't exist, and apart from God's Decree, would never exist. So God could have ABORTED David, before he even began; could have aborted him, post-death. But instead, saved him, knitting him in MESSIAH's womb. Yes, knitting, for the verb raqam here is the same verb as used for making the Temple veil. Yes, Messiah's womb, for the noun seter is a famous Psalm term for God as Hiding Place.

All this is aborted from the translation, of course, in favor of pagan politics giving Caesar some right to determine life! See what SEWAGE the prolife movement is, aborting the SALVATION meaning of this verse?

---

PB8 Is God a Murderer?

Worldwide, posit that at least 100 million couples in this 7-billion-human planet, will have sex today. Next, posit that only 10% of the women, will become pregnant as a result. So that means 10 million fetuses will 'begin', today.

• Now, spontaneous abortion occurs maybe 50% of the time, but let's use the video's estimate of 20%. Therefore, of the 10 million fetuses, 2 million will spontaneously abort.
• 2 million times 30 days equals 60 million in a month. Roughly, the population of France.
• So ask yourself: is God a Murderer? Murdering each month, a whole country?
• Those fetuses never heard the Gospel. Those fetuses didn't have brains, to be able to say yes or no to the Gospel, because the brain doesn't begin to function with THOUGHT, until birth.
• So is a whole country of helpless fetuses being condemned to hell by God, every month?
• Time to reconsider the claim that abortion is murder.. and regain, common sense.

---

PB9a Num5:27, God orders abortion?

Shocker passage, Numbers 5:27-28. I really wish I didn't have to do this Episode. Gotta show you the Hebrew, in later videos of this Episode!

---

PB9b Num 5:27, God orders abortion?

Continued from 9a, intro to this shocking passage. 9c et seq. will launch into the Hebrew of the mistranslated words.

---

PB9c Num 5:27, God orders abortion?

This 9c focuses on how translators try to hide the fact that the Hebrew (and Greek) say the woman's WOMB will blow up. The word WOMB is covered up, usually with 'abdomen' or 'belly', in translation. This video shows the many bad translations.

Next, a quick Word search on the Hebrew word beten=womb, proves that in 72 other verses, Hebrew beten is properly translated as 'womb', but -- not here. Why? They are AFRAID for you to learn what Bible says in Numbers 5:27! Political correctness! In preference to learning the Word of God!

See, this is what makes 'prolife' evil. They ABORT the LIVING WORD of God in translation! Sooner or later you'll have to decide where you stand: with what the Word says, however politically-incorrect -- or with what people say, James 4:4?

Notice that you don't have to become pro-abortion to be AGAINST, aborting the Word of God...

---

PB9d Num 5:27, God orders abortion?

How the word 'swell' is mistranslated to cover up the fact that Numbers 5:27 is a God ordered PUNISHMENT of abortion, naturally or supernaturally administered via the priest who has to curse the water the woman drinks. Drinking the water, induces it. Translators know this. One even speculated that the woman was already pregnant at the time she drinks the water, as you'll see at the end of 9h. But can you see all that in translation? Oh no! It's covered up with really silly language, like 'swell'!

Political correctness plagues Bible translation. Because, Christians are very legalistic, petty, mean-minded and dominate translation committees, so that an honest translator is never respected. Oh no: gotta play footsie with those who want to impose their politics, over the Word! Lots of Rev17 harlots, now!

So this 9d has to begin outside Bible lexicons, with the GREEK translation of the Hebrew, since the Hebrew lexicons won't directly admit that tsava means to blow up and then blow out! Had to go to Tufts University for the Greek, to demonstrate the validity of that Hebrew meaning.

---

PB9e Num 5:27, God orders abortion?

How the word 'waste away' is mistranslated to cover up the fact that Numbers 5:27 is a God ordered PUNISHMENT of water-induced abortion -- 'waste away' is really 'fall', meaning the fetus falling OUT of the womb, never alive.

Translators know this. But it's covered up with 'waste away'! Despite the fact that the other 400+ times the same verb is used, it's properly translated as 'fall', 'cast out', etc.!

---

PB9f Num 5:27, God orders abortion?

Continued, on how the word 'waste away' is mistranslated to cover up the fact that Numbers 5:27 is a God ordered PUNISHMENT of water-induced abortion.

Translators know this. But it's covered up with 'waste away'! Despite the fact that the other 400+ times the same verb is used, it's properly translated as 'fall', 'cast out', etc.!

---

PB9g Num 5:27, God orders abortion?

Did you know babies come out from thighs? Well, if you looked at the mistranslation in Numbers 5:27 and certain other key verses, that's what you're told Bible says! Imagine the field day that atheists have with THAT?

Yeah, except prudish translators cover up what Bible says. So here and in 9h, we'll see what 'thigh' really is. How blatant the mistranslation and coverup, too.

For Numbers 5:27 is a God ordered PUNISHMENT of abortion, naturally or supernaturally administered via the priest who has to curse the water the woman drinks. Drinking the water, induces it. Translators know this. One even speculated that the woman was already pregnant at the time she drinks the water, as you'll see at the end of 9h. But can you see all that in translation? Oh no! It's covered up with really silly language, like 'thigh'!

So at the end of 9h, the translation is corrected, and surprise surprise, only ONE of dozens of Bible translations, had the courage to show at least something of what the verse means...

---

PB9h Num 5:27, God orders abortion?

Link to Luke 8 video is here: • Faith Without Works Poop II: Luke 8 ...

Continued on Numbers 5:27, how prudish translators cover up what Bible says. But also, how some translators have HONEST COURAGE to tell you (albeit still fuzzed over) what the verse really says.

For Numbers 5:27 is a God ordered PUNISHMENT of abortion, naturally or supernaturally administered via the priest who has to curse the water the woman drinks. Drinking the water, induces it. Translators know this.

TWOT speculated that the woman was already pregnant at the time she drinks the water, as you'll see at the end of this 9h.

But can you see all that in translation? Oh no! It's covered up with really silly language, like 'thigh'!

So at the end of 9h, the translation is corrected, and surprise surprise, only ONE of dozens of Bible translations, had the courage to show at least something of what the verse means.. and we see the corrected translation.. a God-ordered CONTINUAL abortion.

---

PB9i Num 5:27 is NOT a license for abortion!

This shouldn't have to be said, but just because God ordered abortion for infidelity under the Mosaic Law, doesn't mean you should get one if that's why you're pregnant. As always, the issue is GOD's Choice, which is what Numbers 5:27-28 assert. It was solely GOD's choice to make the 'water' cause abortion or not, as the priest had to explain. For, only GOD causes life at birth. So an abortion meant that no fetus would exit the womb and have a soul created; so no life would be created. It was a punishment, abortion. Not, an escape.

Prolifers are fundamentally evil because they play Revelation 17 politics with abortion, when only GOD has the right to life. They abort the Bible when they do this, giving to Caesar a right belonging only to God.

But the one who uses the fact that abortion is not murder as an excuse to get one, is also aborting Scripture. For what does Scripture say, in over 300 verses? ONLY GOD creates life. So if you're pregnant, you seek GOD's opinion. How do you know if He wants that fetus to come to term? So don't imitate the prolifers by being your own god. Seek His Opinion, instead.

Be pro-God's Choice. And keep Caesar out of it, pro or con. Because the life, is God's. The decision, is God's. So seek GOD's ruling, and you'll do well. Don't seek His Ruling, and Colossians 3:25, Gal 6:7, Hebrews 10:29, and many like penalty verses -- will smack you upside the head.

---

PB10a Exodus 21:22, Abortion is not murder!

Direct evidence in the BIBLE's original Hebrew, translated Greek and Latin Vulgate, and at least 8 English Bible translations (including ones Catholics use) -- that GOD says the fetus is not human. So when it aborts, no murder has been committed.

So any Presidential or other 'Christian' candidate claiming that abortion is murder, should be ostracized, by Christians. For that person cannot be competent in secular reading, if he's not competent in BIBLE reading.

Pox on prolifers. They all ABORT Christ's Word.

---

PB10c Exodus 21:22, Abortion is not murder!

Conclusion for now: background exegesis to explain the direct evidence in BIBLE's original Hebrew, translated Greek and Latin Vulgate, and at least 8 English Bible translations (including ones Catholics use) -- that GOD says the fetus is not human. So when it aborts, no murder has been committed.

---

PB11a Are prolifers more holy than CHRIST in Heb 10:5?

They sure think they are more holy, for CHRIST SAID on the DAY HE WAS BORN that HE was not the BODY. Where? Hebrews 10:5, which is reviewed in this video.

I'll do later ones on the exegesis, but this 11a is ONLY about the obvious fact that prolifers don't give a flip about Bible, but are using fetus issue to gain political power, and are as such all Revelation 17 POLITICAL CHRISTIANITY HARLOTS.

That is why DT is winning. Once you reject the lie, you get strong delusion, 2Thess2:11.

The whole PB series starts here: • 2 SatStrat Prolife is Anti-Semitic

There are over 500 verses in Bible which explain why a) life begins at BIRTH (Gen 2:7 so you are not evolved), and hence fetal tissue is a house (Ps139 but it's vilely mistranslated to cover up the truth), etc. If I live long enough, I'll try to show all of them. But a fair amount of the salient verses are already done. See also http://www.brainout.net/NoWombLife.htm on Psalm 139's corr trans, with Hebrew annotates, so you can start to see that 3300 years of KNOWING abortion is not murder, are being denied now by Caesar-hungry 'prolifers' -- it's a sham, k?

In the video here, I talk about Psalm 139:16, and made a video about it showing the Hebrew earlier, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn8_lhMC_LM&index=15&list=PL144D716E521647D1

Fuller exegesis of Psalm 139 is in NoWombLife.htm

UPSHOT: the BIBLE's point is, GOD ALONE makes you a you, at BIRTH. That's why you can be saved, why you're not evolved, why abortion has NO PLACE in secular law. And for 3300 years, from Moses forward, abortion was indeed, never called murder. Since all the 'prolife' folks who WANT to call it murder to GET political power of CAESAR, and are even willing to endorse OBVIOUS IMMORAL LIAR DONALD TRUMP to get that power, clearly they are more than willing to ABORT THE WORD OF GOD. For He doesn't matter to them. BEWARE of ignoring those facts.

---

PB12 Genesis 2:7 Says Life begins at BIRTH

Genesis 2:7 word for word in the Hebrew, proves life begins AT BIRTH, never before.

Focus of the Genesis videos is just to show the real Hebrew versus all the cockamamie lies said about it. I did not know Genesis was metered when I made this video (before 2008 but I'd have to find the original files to know exactly when).

So you can argue all you like, but you're arguing with GOD, not me. I just show live Bible onscreen. That is a WITNESS function, never teaching.

---

PB13a Job3:3 says Life Begins At Birth

Prolife liars who won't consult the Bible throw around verses with smug satisfaction that they are proven right, only to be proven wrong BY GOD in the very verses they cite. This is one of those verses, thrown at me just now in twitter (@brainouty, by TicklishAngel).

So here we see how embarrassing it is for a prolifer to get caught NOT READING a verse cited. Don't be like that. LEARN WHAT BIBLE SAYS FIRST so God won't have to embarrass you in convo with someone who actually DOES read it.

Again, I'm not pro-abortion, am adopted. But aborting the Word is a criminal offense, 1Jn5:16 and all skotizw sklerow verses. GOD ALONE MAKES YOU AT BIRTH is the Bible focus, not the tawdry politics before mere Caesar.

---

PB13b Job3:3 says Life Begins At Birth

Calmer summary of the SEQUENCE to prove prolifers hate Bible, cuz even in translation you can see that conception does not FOLLOW birth, so the translation lies. Why does it lie? Vid goes through that, too.

---

PB13c Job3:3 says Life Begins At Birth

Focus now on the GREEK to show the Vulgate invents the lie of conception, to further prove prolifers hate Bible, cuz even in translation you can see that conception does not FOLLOW birth, so translations provably lie by using the Vulgate, not God's Word.

Talk 2any Jew/reader of Aramaic 2verify hara means BE PREGNANT, not 'conceive'+read Num11:12, Job15:35,Ps7:14,Isa33:11,59:4,13

Now think: a sin isn't a sin until BORN. To CONCEIVE of it, as noted above, is but temptation.

Sheesh. Prolifers really don't know Bible at all, and spit on God by lying against His Word.

---

PB 14 PROLIFE PROVEN A 1978 JERRY FALWELL SCAM INVENTION

Just found this PBS Frontline series this am.

• Link to it: https://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/view/
• Last hour proves the whole anti-abortion thingy was cooked up SOLELY FOR POLITICAL POWER.. until then, the 'evangelicals' weren't interested in the abortion issue!
• If you're #prolife, not only are you as anti-Bible as you can be, since GOD SAYS you're not human till HE MAKES YOU AT BIRTH, but you're also a sucker for scams.

---

PB15, Luke 1:15 and 1:41 prove NO LIFE IN WOMB

Live Bible Greek text proves that translators and hence teachers LIE AGAINST THE BIBLE to claim a 'baby' is in the womb, when the REAL BIBLE says the opposite. Here, you have to see context of Verse 15, to understand verse 41.

Notice the lie in verse 15, reversing the GREEK which says John will be filled ONCE OUTSIDE THE WOMB, to say 'while yet inside'. LYING AGAINST BIBLE!

So too, verse 41 in GREEK says ELIZABETH, not the fetus, is filled with the Spirit, and the FETUS not baby, was caused to 'leap' due to HER being filled; this is called 'reflex motility' in modern biology, check with any OB/GYN.

So you see: JUST AS TEACHERS LIE TO YOU ABOUT WHEN LIFE BEGINS, SPITTING ON CHRIST, they lie to you about Trump.. all to gain POLITICAL POWER. And you are guilty, if you prefer their lies to God's Truth.

The Mounce reference re ek is in Appendix page 328 of his book, Basics of Biblical Greek ISBN 0-310-23211-2, circle diagram to stress ek is OUTSIDE not inside. Title of page is 'Spatial Representation of Prepositions', in case in your edition of the book it isn't on the same page.