Meter Quick Links
← Poetic Meter Resource Index
← Poetic Meter Forum Threads
← Poetic Meter Excel Docs + Webpages
← Poetic Meter Word Docs + Webpages
← Downloads Index (All Files)

An indexing of all of the Poetic Meter related videos, pages, and resources: for those who would like to view everything in a single pane of glass. Please be advised that all of the below embedded YouTube videos may take a moment to cache from YouTube. All of the documentation and videos are long and complicated — really this is years of research — but I've done my best to condense it along with web page conversions of the .doc and .xls files (if viewing them directly in a web browser is preferred).

Why a 'Poetic Meter'?

• • It acts as a form of error-correction to heal itself from scribal transcription errors, copy errors, malicious additions etc.
  • It creates a layer of extra information to virtualize:

1. A solar calendar to map time: important for timed doctrine for application, Christians need to be aware of what's happening although the majority will ignore this and succumb to things like claiming the 'End Times' for every major calamity or being obsessed with Prolife/Physical blood of Christ
2. It tracks historical events: nobody will be able to use the excuse that the Bible isn't divine nor that God provided no evidence; ignoring secular proofs like God's character being written in every atom.
3. A dateline for precise dating of each book and therefore the order of which they were written:

Book Name	Year Written	Notes
Matthew	30 AD	Certifiably the first book in the New Testament; major doctrines route back here
Galatians	49 AD	By Paul
James	50 AD
1 & 2 Thessalonians	53 AD	By Paul
1 & 2 Corinthians	54/55 AD	By Paul
Romans	56 AD	By Paul
Luke	58 AD
Philippians	60 AD	By Paul
Philemon	60 AD	By Paul
Acts	62 AD	By Luke
Colossians	62 AD	By Paul
Ephesians	62-63 AD	By Paul
1 & 2 Timothy	66/65 AD	By Paul
Titus	66 AD	Post-Paul, Paul dies: year of the four emperors begins
1 & 2 Peter	68 AD	Post-Paul
Jude	68 AD	Lord's brother, succeeded after James was murdered. Jude is in exile
Hebrews	68 AD	Post-Paul
Mark	69 AD
John	77 AD
1 & 2 & 3 John	77 AD
Revelation	88 AD	Certifiably the last book as it 'bookends' everything prior

• It helps recover lost pronunciation, the meter is influenced by syllables which in turn forces pronunciation, otherwise the math won't work.

• It acts as a form of memorization aide, especially useful in times where there were no computers where they would 'sing' it, this phenomenon in modern times has found its way into SM64 'beatcounting' which is used for blind folded speedruns, if the time in the game is metered you can know where a moving platform will be without having to see it. They also used the metering for reference since none of believers in the Old Testament or New Testament days used 'verses' as we do today.

• • This is probably why followers of Hinduism and Islam are encouraged to 'sing' their holy books in their languages: if we are under the assumption the demons are eager to parody this in their own home-grown religions while ensuring nobody sings the Bible in the original languages anymore, you'll never see Christians singing the metered Greek anywhere, and especially never Hebrew 🤔. Of course many will disagree with this despite the fact the Qur'an and Bhagavad Gita plagiarize and reverse nearly every major doctrine in the Bible: few have studied all books in tandem to notice this.

• It acts as an unequivocal method to determine which books are canonical and which ones aren't (apocryphal books cannot be metered), this also means there are no 'lost' books as the meter requires all genuine books to be extant.

• It acts as undeniable proof the original language texts are inhuman pieces of literature; it's impossible to meter multiple languages across multiple time periods across mutiple writing styles and somehow still be consistent, all the while still virtualizing a solar calendar behind the scenes.

• A hermeneutic for textual interpretation and context.

• A concordance for cross-referencing related passages and calling back to others.

We have to assume if God existed and He wanted the original language texts preserved through imperfect copies, there would have to be a method to accomplish all of the above, and so there is: the poetic meter. Is the entire Bible metered? It would have to be given God's method of using copies of manuscripts and also due to the fact the time of the rapture isn't known (which means that meter goes on for a long time 😅); but finding every meter everywhere and how it all ties in with each book would require a substantial amount of research which nobody's bothered to do yet; and the people who were aware of it never bothered to find the correct integers to meter with. It will require many lifetimes of research to meter the entire Bible.

Therefore the Poetic Meter also means that: no translation is inspired (translations cannot be metered) and no books are missing, otherwise the math will fail, eventually at least (also technically there being '66' books is a trinity number and a big hint that it's the right amount: which is also why '12' apostles and '24' elders are also numbers divisible by 3). This has nothing to do with the modern conspiratorial 'Bible Codes' or I Ching or coincidences but the raw syllables in the languages themselves, there's no guessing or assumptions or statistics: the metering is entirely dependent on the languages. The Masoretes were apparently aware of this to a certain extent as for sevening they put the appropriate punctuation to match.

This unfortunately also means that while we have all of the copies of every manuscript available, nobody has metered all of the manuscripts to rebuild a 100% perfect Bible even though it's possible, little minor errors will always persist without the Poetic Meter's error correction applied; this applies to most things in life which is why our DNA needs error correction, why computers need error correction, why we need to proofread etc.

This is therefore, one of the largest and most important doctrines in Christianity that Christendom has ignored. It also subsequently decimates long contested misinformation and false doctrines extant in 90% of denominations, in a single swoop: no Preterism, no Peter-being-a-pope, no works salvation, no Calvinism, always pre-Tribulation Rapture, no screaming "the end times are here right now" (which every generation has been claiming post-Christ), no KJV-only, etc etc etc.

BC or (AD)	Year of World	God Measures Time & Crafts Deadlines
4106	0	Man's Time Begins at Adam's Fall
3616	490	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded a super-mature believer, else Time ends.
3616-3546	490-560	Voting period for BELIEVERS to choose God or not.
3546	560	Historical 560 accounting Deadline (at end of voting period)
3126	980	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
3106	1000	Qualifying Deadline for new 1000 year time grant to be awarded a super-mature believer, else Time ends.
3106-3056	1000-1050	Voting period for the world to choose God or not.
3056	1050	Historical Deadline balancing 490-year accounting to 1050 unit.
3056	1050	Historical Deadline (at end of voting period), completion of 1050 unit.
2636	1470	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
2566	1540	Historical 490 accounting deadline
2566-2496	1540-1610	Voting period for BELIEVERS to choose God or not.
2496	1610	Historical 560 accounting Deadline (at end of voting period)
2146	1960	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
2106	2000	Qualifying Deadline for new 1000 year time grant to be awarded.
2056-2006	2050-2100	Voting period for the world to choose God or not.
2006	2100	Historical Deadline balancing 490-year accounting to 1050 unit.
2006	2100	Historical Deadline, completion of 1050 unit.
1656	2450	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
1516	2590	Historical 490 accounting deadline
1516-1446	2590-2660	Voting period for BELIEVERS to choose God or not.
1446	2660	Historical 560 accounting Deadline (at end of voting period)
1166	2940	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
1106	3000	Qualifying Deadline for new 1000 year time grant to be awarded.
1006-956	3100-3150	Voting period for the world to choose God or not.
956	3150	Historical Deadline balancing 490-year accounting to 1050 unit.
956	3150	Historical Deadline, completion of 1050 unit.
676	3430	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
466	3640	Historical 490 accounting deadline
466-396	3640-3710	Voting period for BELIEVERS to choose God or not.
396	3710	Historical 560 accounting Deadline (at end of voting period)
186	3920	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
106	4000	Qualifying Deadline for new 1000 year time grant to be awarded.
(44)-(94)	4150-4200	Voting period for the world to choose God or not.
(94)	4200	Historical Deadline balancing 490-year accounting to 1050 unit.
(94)	4200	Historical Deadline, completion of 1050 unit.
(304)	4410	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
(584)	4690	Historical 490 accounting deadline
(584)-(654)	4690-4760	Voting period for BELIEVERS to choose God or not.
(654)	4760	Historical 560 accounting Deadline (at end of voting period)
(794)	4900	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
(894)	5000	Qualifying Deadline for new 1000 year time grant to be awarded.
(1094)-(1144)	5200-5250	Voting period for the world to choose God or not.
(1144)	5250	Historical Deadline balancing 490-year accounting to 1050 unit.
(1144)	5250	Historical Deadline, completion of 1050 unit.
(1284)	5390	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
(1634)	5740	Historical 490 accounting deadline
(1634)-(1704)	5740-5810	Voting period for BELIEVERS to choose God or not.
(1704)	5810	Historical 560 accounting Deadline (at end of voting period)
(1774)	5880	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.
(1894)	6000	Qualifying Deadline for new 1000 year time grant to be awarded.
(2144)-(2194)	6250-6300	Voting period for the world to choose God or not.
(2194)	6300	Historical Deadline balancing 490-year accounting to 1050 unit.
(2194)	6300	Historical Deadline, completion of 1050 unit.
(2264)	6370	Qualifying Deadline for new 490-year time grant to be awarded.

CORRECTION: at 15:45 and following, I mistakenly said the 63rd syllable is at the end of Psalm 90:4. It's really Psalm 90:3, clever 'return' theme.

Ask any Jew what 'return' means: return to the LAND, special term. Which is, exactly what Israel was poised to do, when Moses wrote Psalm 90! Returning as God promised Abraham she would, in Genesis 12, 15, 17! Returning as Joseph made Israel promise when they'd bury him, to bring his sarcophagus, out of Egypt!

The 84 is the end count in Psalm 90:4, which theme is that the Day of the Lord is as a 1000 years, reference to the promised Millennium, which is yet future. So Moses ties Genesis 1 to it, to add to the REASON WHY ISRAEL EXISTS. Not about, how old the earth is. VERY DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE.

---

Keeping it Simple: Bible Meter is an easy way to memorize Bible that the ancients used. How do we know? By counting the syllables, ABCDEFG for them.

Genesis 1 used in this video (screen stays static, keeping it simple for now: genesis1.htm

The 1050 structure in Genesis 1 meter is actually a pan-Bible structure, and all the Bible dates are hubbed to it. Time Map of these: GeneYrs.xls

Also see Sanhedrin97-99 in the Talmud. Online Talmuds are somewhat few, but my favorite is RabbinicTraditions.com: Legal Texts before 500 CE in Mishnah, Tosephta, Babylonian & Jerusalem Talmuds. It's searchable.

Bible verses used to create it: brainoutFAQ.htm#6a.

---

Simpler, short approach to understanding Bible Meter, which scholars have known existed, since the Reformation.. but haven't figured out. This series goes slowly and uses English first; so it will be easier to grasp. You will be able to proof the interp, with real history.

The purpose, is to see the face of God in the text, how much God loves you; but you can't see that, until you know text is TIMED for your benefit. What benefit? To protect you. To tell you how people in the world are thinking during your time, so you won't be fooled.

So we start with Matthew 24:1 in any Bible you choose. You need the Greek, to know what time the words cover

---

Section of the Matt 24 playlist which just focuses on Bible meter 101 introduction. We go verse by verse in English so you can easily prove relevance & value. Best of all, you should be able to see the face of God 😍 Sorry about the voice; I have breast cancer & it spit into my throat. I'm on chemo, so my throat is getting gradually better. I'm still bedridden & blinded by cataracts, so I can't do this on PC, yet. Thank you for your patience!

• Anno Domini Forum Thread
• Luke Dateline Meters Page

Localized source from the original threads located on the Bibleworks forum, which is being shut down: https://web.archive.org/web/20150911234754/http://www.bibleworks.com/forums/showthread.php?6133-Bible-has-its-own-method-of-ANNO-DOMINI-display.

---

[03-12-2015, 12:47 PM #1 | brainout | Join Date May 2004 | Posts 124]
Default Bible has its own method of ANNO DOMINI display

BIBLE USES METER IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE TEXT TO DATE ITS BOOKS AND SERVE AS A CALENDAR COUNTDOWN TO MESSIAH AND MILLENNIUM, EVER SINCE GENESIS. That's the theme of this post. The meter is based on a doctrine the Jews still recite in garbled form, that God assigns 2000 years to the goyim (really 2100) then 2000 to the Jews (really 2100) and then Messiah comes (and He did, born 4103 from Adam's Fall). To see JUST THE BIBLE's own timeline without any other source, you can view https://vimeo.com/channels/howgodorchestratestime or vimeo-how-god-orchestrates-time.htm. The origin for the Jewish statement is in Psalm 90. To see how Psalm 90 furnishes proof of the 2100 and 2100, go here: https://vimeo.com/channels/psalm90 (now null). But those are complex videos. If you need a simpler start, go here: https://vimeo.com/brainout

I've been working on this for seven years, and now have the confidence to state it categorically: whether in the Hebrew or the Greek, Bible has its own system for telling you when something happened and when any given book (or sometimes, even a particular chapter) is WRITTEN. I call the latter, 'dateline meter', and its based on the writer 'sevening' the words (by syllable counts).

In the NT, the writers 'seven' to tell you their book dates, based on events in Christ's life. I've been making videos using the Greek pasted from Bibleworks' BGT, showing this live in the text. Sometimes the variants make a huge difference, and without the CNTTS embedded apparatus, I'd not know the vital differences.

For example, Paul has a penchant for dating his books based on Christ's AGE at the time written, and since Bible has two timelines for His Age — one based on Abrahamic deadlines and the other based on Davidic — Paul sometimes uses one timeline or the other. The Abrahamic deadline corresponds exactly with our 'AD', because Varro's calendar is three years overpadded (as Livy, Nepos and others complained at the time Augustus was considering which Roman auc to adopt). So Paul neatly accomplishes the adjustment to Varronic dates, by using the Abrahamic timeline.

Upshot: every Bible book dates itself, as to when written. So all the arguing that's gone on for centuries can cease. Well, as soon as you see for yourself, how the Bible (Hebrew and now Greek) meter works.

https://vimeo.com/brainout is my vimeo page with the latest of these videos on it, plus some orientation videos, since I've now documented this meter in over 20 Bible books. Will finish documenting the dateline use of the meter pan-NT, in a few days. I've done all the NT books now except for Titus and Philemon, though I've not yet posted the dateline meter videos for Romans and both Thessalonians. Will be doing that by the weekend.

You can test all this live onscreen. I use Bibleworks 5 to show it, but occasionally BW9, which I also have. Feel free to ask questions here or in vimeo. I post here because this will help many resolve many pesky Bible date questions which have plagued scholars for centuries. I learned it all by accident, when analyzing Moeller's 'Great Isaiah Scroll', back in 2007.

This stuff is vital to textual criticism and hermeneutics. It's also JUST THE BIBLE, so there's no need for attribution, no credits or copyrights to observe, other than BIBLEWORKS, which I adore. Just observe the methodology, and you can date ANY Bible book, yourself. Ergo all this disclosure. Not right, that I should keep it to myself.

I know there will be a lot of scoffing and skepticism. But anyone can count syllables. The system is very sophisticated, it's syntactical, and it goes back to Psalm 90, which the previous link's videos, will explain.

[Last edited by brainout; 03-12-2015 at 12:59 PM. Reason: Added first paragraph in caps to provide abstract of import.]

---

[03-20-2015, 03:34 PM #2 | brainout | Join Date May 2004 | Posts 124]
Links to see the Anno Domini rhetorical styles in Bible for yourself

All using Bibleworks' own text, sometimes tweaked for variants (which are highlighted or stricken out, versus BGT, so the differences are obvious at a glance):

Summary channel with panoramic list of all NT and some OT book styles, which you can watch in order in 'couch mode' (click on the couch icon once you're in the channel): https://vimeo.com/channels/bibledatelinemeters. Sometimes BW5 is used, sometimes BW9, as I have both, but you should be able to read the fonts in the download docs just fine, all of which are PASTED from BW. The only stuff which is copyrighted is the BW material; I didn't and won't copyright the research results. So you don't need to credit me. The point is to see the text and meter FOR YOURSELF, as it's forensically provable. The talker doesn't matter. THE TEXT ALONE MATTERS. And baby, all that hard work of the BW people and the centuries of painstaking copying.. really pay off, as you'll see here. Life without BW is not worth living, cuz I'd never have this fast and clear a sight of HIM, without it.

Most of the more conservative Bible book dates are thus validated. A few are radically different, i.e., Matthew datelines his gospel as 476 years after Nehemiah 6:15, 427 years after Malachi (using the syllable counts in Matt 1), so 30 AD. Rev is 88/9 AD, and the other Johannine books much earlier. Since the Church Fathers made up horrible lies against John (see their own words, https://vimeo.com/channels/churchfathers), of course they misdate his books. I'd be surprised if any one of them ever once really saw him.

Preterism and Replacement Theology bite the dust, once you see these provable meters. Jewish Dispensationalism (as in Sanhedrin 97-99) receives some criticism, too, as they garbled the Psalm 90 count (did video on that too, here: https://vimeo.com/brainout/rabbinanity), else it's provably the version of Dispensationalism BIBLE supports (which is simpler and tracked historically in Bible, versus what my fellow Dispies have been saying all along). Pre-Trib Rapture is an ACCOUNTING NECESSITY with TWO SEVENS left on Israel's clock when Christ dies (which scholars all miss, since they use lunar years to account the 62 weeks); so Church YES goes up at Rapture (event Rev 4:1), and Bible since Moses tracked the time to when the Trib was supposed to begin. Church was not prophesied, and never replaces Israel. The Millennium is literal. All this you'll see in the meters, as they TRACK TIME based on those doctrines.

Overview of the TIME doctrine's math, including showing how the Bible's dates all hub to that doctrine: https://vimeo.com/channels/howgodorchestratestime ; how to use the GeneYrs.xls worksheet: https://vimeo.com/channels/genesisexeg/78213123; verses used to construct worksheet's BIBLE ONLY DATES: brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

Sorry this is so complex, but I've been working on it 15 years, trying to understand the 'salt' doctrine, which in my (now dead) pastor's words was called 'believers are used by God to buy time'. How? I wondered, so asked God where in Bible to find the proof, starting in year 2000. Well, now I know and all this post shows you where you can see it in Bible for yourself, too. Use 1John1:9 as you study it, else you're wasting your time. I sure did, when I forgot to use it.

Whole channels are devoted to some of the Bible books, because the meters all ape Psalm 90, Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9's meter (again using BW5). These OT channel links are:

Psalm 90: https://vimeo.com/channels/psalm90
Isaiah 53: https://vimeo.com/channels/isaiah53
Daniel 9: https://vimeo.com/channels/dan9meter

Each OT book like each NT book, is metered at its beginning. I've not had time to do the rest. Of particular importance will be Genesis 1 and 49 (yes, important chapters have their own dateline and other meters).

Matthew is provably the first Gospel, channel here: https://vimeo.com/channels/mattmeter. Synoptics channel, https://vimeo.com/channels/synoptics , shows how Luke 'wraps' his text to Matthew,and THEN Mark 'wraps' to Luke and Matthew, so those claiming 'quelle' or Mark as first Gospel, are obviously wrong. Can prove that, even from translation. So the meters are just adjunctive to proving which Gospel is really first. However, the meters are quite precise.

Then the first one to meter a 1000-year long recap of the prophecy of Messiah fulfilled, balancing for Abraham's too-early supermaturation (who matured 2046 from Adam's fall, 53.5 years in advance of the 1050+1050 deadline from Adam's fall), was Mary in her Magnificat, channel here: https://vimeo.com/channels/magnificatmeter

Next books were Galatians through Romans, all in this channel as well as in the Bible Dateline Meters channel above: https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeter

Luke wrote next, codifying the Magnificat, building his entire Gospel outline around Magnificat, demonstrated here (and its doc has a comprehensive list of all associated videos, docs, webpages, which I constantly update): https://vimeo.com/channels/lukemeter

In the same year, when Paul first imprisoned, both Luke and Ephesians came out. Paul's Ephesians piggybacked on Mary piggybacking on Daniel, to form a 434 (plus her 56) added timeline to complete time prophetically to Odovacer to show Church 'salt' trend (negatively), style: https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs10

Actual timeline in Ephesians, syllable=year AD charting the emperors, so much so that each 2nd eta in each thelematos was reserved for an Emperor whose 'will' (get the pun) got undone by his successor (Trajan then Macrinus then Diocletian), here: https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeterggs11

James wrote last in the same year, and his 2nd dateline is also patterned on Luke, specifically on Zecharias' speech: https://vimeo.com/channels/jamesexegesis

Then came the prison epistles ending with Philemon, all in the Bible Dateline Meters channel or here: https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeter

Then came Acts, when Paul got out of jail in 62, here: https://vimeo.com/channels/lukemeter

Then came the post-prison epistles 1Tim, Titus and finally 2 Tim. The Timothy letters are in their own channel: https://vimeo.com/channels/timmeter. Titus is with the other Pauline channel material, here: https://vimeo.com/channels/paulmeter

Next, Paul dies probably March 68 AD as a result of Vindex courting rebellion (can't yet prove it wholly, but the hypothesis is plausible), so Peter writes to Paul's old stomping ground, adding to the prophecy content about Church in 1 and 2 Peter, creating a marching song from the Ephesians text, here: https://vimeo.com/channels/petermeter

Then Peter dies, and Jude comes in, adds a 'stanza' to the marching song, here: https://vimeo.com/channels/judemeter

Then comes Mark, https://vimeo.com/channels/marksgospel; and Hebrews, published within 9 months of each other; given the meter, maybe written by Luke and Mark. Hebrews uses Mark's order of points in his Gospel to craft the Hebrews' outline, videos showing that, start here (all videos not done yet): https://vimeo.com/channels/marksgospel/79029281

Then Temple goes down; seven years after, John writes His Gospel; then 3 years later, 1 John; then 8-9 years later, Revelation, all here: https://vimeo.com/channels/johnmeter

This is all provable. Just parse the text into clauses, then count the syllables per clause; then aggregate them in another column, as you'll see me do in the docs and videos (which means you can catch me where I've screwed up, ha). First and second time the aggregated syllables 'seven', are the book's datelines. Any more sevening after that, creates a prophecy of some kind, a concordance tag to another Bible passage, etc. However, from Acts forward there is a more complex dating formula which uses the values in EACH CLAUSE to construct an elaborate doctrinal precis of the date. John uses this style exclusively. The first link in this post shows the style pan-NT, with examples highlighted for some minutes in some of the first 10 videos. The 'normal' OT style was to just seven twice, and then you measured back and forward from each dateline to get your Time GPS, and that first link in this post also shows that style briefly. You'll see it yourself when you parse any Bible book start or important chapter.

The commonality of formulas and tags is distinctive, so identifiable as to what Bible book and where in it, the tag intends you to look. Dateline tags are usually in years-from

Christ SHOULD HAVE BEEN BORN under the Abrahamic timeline (2046+2100 limit of Time - 40 allotment for His Life, 4106 is the BC/AD converter Bible uses); or, when He was actually born, 4103 after Adam's fall (using only Bible, not a church father, Ussher, or other guy who didn't ONLY use Bible and ONLY solar years to do his tally). That year, was 1000 years after David crowned at Hebron in 1010 BC. So it's three years earlier than the original schedule, because David was crowned seven years' late over all Israel (2 Sam 5-7). David dies at age 77 (big scholar mistake to misread 1Kings 6:1 which plainly says David had been dead 3.5 years when the Temple construction started). So the new outer limit of time became 4143 not 4146 (1000 years after David died), and THAT is the limit of the 62 weeks in Daniel, too (586 BC -70= 516 BC -70 = 446 BC Nehemiah's visit -49 years THEN =- 434 = 37 AD = 4143 from Adam's Fall). Because, the Temple had a 490-year time grant which at its demise, still had 126 years remaining, as Isaiah 53 had charted (video showing that, here: https://vimeo.com/channels/isaiah53/78238864). So part of the '70 weeks' is reimbursement on 'unpaid' Temple Time, and the Trib = seven of those years. The 62 weeks reimburses for the 364 years Temple stood, too, plus another 70 years (video shows that). Very bald accounting.

• When He reached Roman age of manhood (to play Psalm 90:15 equidistance game with 15th year of Tiberius)
• When He went out into the wilderness at age 29 (same as toga virilis),
• When He should have died under the Abrahamic schedule (4146),
• the Davidic Schedule (4143), and
• when He really died (4136, the 61st week, not 62nd).
• Forward, datelines are phrased in terms of years to the Trib (4194 start), the Mill (4201 start), or some subset (like the payback for Abraham's credit, a favorite with the NT writers).
• Additionally, there are four fiscal years to reconcile: autumnal (Rosh HaShanah), vernal (Nisan, Exo 12), Roman (calendar), and His Own 25 Chislev aka Chanukah aka 1st day of Saturnalia birthday (joke Paul makes in Gal 4:4 using Chronos aka Saturn, prophecy in Haggai 2 which Mary quotes). So when the writer switches fiscals, he generally subtracts or adds a year to his tally; you thus know more precisely, when he writes.
• Everyone was counting the 40 years after His Death, to the demise of the Temple.
• Datelines back to significant events in Israel's history (including important Roman dates) help provide a secular GPS of 'where we are on the Time Map'.

All these formulas were used since Moses, but were back then, years-to-Messiah-AND-Trib-AND-Millennium related. Post Cross, they are Anno Domini values, as you'll see in the docs and videos. Ultimate proof that the Infallible and Inerrant Word Was Preserved, despite all the (usually picayune) copying errors. Pray for folks like KVJO and Bart Ehrman who can't count syllables, so misthink Bible corrupt. Man, what they are missing!

If I die tonight, I will be content. Absent BW, I'd never know this stuff, and would have far less certitude about Bible meaning.

[Last edited by brainout; 03-20-2015 at 11:52 PM. Reason: clarification]

---

[03-28-2015, 12:13 PM #3 | brainout | Join Date May 2004 | Posts 124]
More updated meters

I just posted a starter video on Genesis 1 meters. It will likely run 1050, but I'm in the middle of doing it and don't yet know for sure, what's the ending count (am up to 707 for the fifth day: each feh marker sevens the paragraph, so it's easy but a pistol to paste in Word). Video is here, but you don't have to watch it; instead, download the doc. Link to the doc is in the vid description, but the doc uploaded only goes through Day 2 (second feh marker). Will take awhile to do the whole thing, as it's the PRECEDENT for all Bible meters. I knew that long ago, but never parsed it until now. You can do it yourself, of course, once you see the style.

Turns out Ephesians also uses ADAMIC YEARS which match the GeneYrs.xls worksheet (thank God I don't have to redo it yet) just like the other NT books all do, but specifically uses the same formulae as Romans. I posted 5 videos on that, starting here. They go through the boring methodology, so you can see how it got done. The last one, https://vimeo.com/brainout/patu44, just shows the result. Again, you can just download the doc from the video descriptions, and bypass the videos entirely. (I only do the videos to explain the docs.)

Sorry but I'm learning all this piecemeal. Turns out also that the intercalation in Bible should go by ELUL not Adar. So the Jewish calendar is totally messed up. If you intercalate ELUL you always hit the autumnal equinox on time. I'll have to correct my prior stuff which talks about intercalating in Adar, since I was an idiot and followed the scholarly writeups instead of doing the math de novo, myself. Israel USED TO intercalate at Elul, a guy named Sacha Stern wrote about that, link here. (Stern is Research Fellow, Lecturer, then Senior Lecturer at Jews' College (now the London School of Jewish Studies), University of London, since 1990.)

Sorry to have to say all this, but it's time we Christians and Jews fixed our centuries-old mistakes instead of covering them up. BIBLE gets trashed when our interpretations of it, are wrong. Hopefully this generation of young folks (I'm too old to do it all) will start making good on the past errors. Errors are fine, to be expected. Covering them up? Not good.

[Last edited by brainout; 03-28-2015 at 12:24 PM. Reason: grammar and bolding]

---

[03-28-2015, 04:20 PM #4 | brainout | Join Date May 2004 | Posts 124]
How to corect the Jewish Calendar

Thanks to an email I just got today from someone else who's also doing the meters in other Bible books, I now know an error I'd been making for some years: my error, was to listen to the 'scholars' and the Jewish calendar practice of intercalating an Adar sheni. That is the WRONG MONTH for intercalation. Bible uses ELUL, and so did Israel, prior to the Exile, per the Talmud.

Am rendering a video now, which in a few hours will have the link http://www.vimeo.com/brainout/patu32, which demonstrates how you can easily fix the Jewish calendar to align with BIBLE, and how it went wrong. Links to the books on the topic written by scholars about Elul intercalation, are in the video description.

Upshot: begin the year at the autumnal equinox, 30 days per month EXCEPT Elul gets 35 or 36 days. Simple. Always aligns with the equinoxes, because Jewish time begins SUNDOWN the PRIOR solar day. Perfect. Every year, no muss no fuss. So why did Israel mess it up so much, and why do we Christians? POLITICS! The stupid Easter Computus is a stain on Christianity, and we never needed it, but to cover up the fact He died on what should have been Passover and rose on First Fruits, they invented East-Star. The Jews for their part, stopped intercalating in Elul because that's what the Babylonians did (never mind, that custom came from DANIEL). Oh well.

Give me a couple of hours to upload everything and write the description. This is really exciting stuff. AT LAST we can see proof the BIBLE ALONE is right. Absent Bibleworks, I'd never have this proof. Best of all, it's BIBLE proof, so you can vet it yourself IN Bible, and don't need some 'brainout' or 'scholar' to rely on! God is always right, we can all rely on His Word!

Added note: I'll have to fix my errors in PassPlot.htm and elsewhere, saying Adar intercalation. For it was supposed to be Elul. Where we prove the Elul intercalation IN Bible I don't yet know, but it's in there.. somewhere.

PATU is now somewhat outdated. Its focus was to discern Paul's Anno Domini conversions. Turns out all NT books use ADAMIC years and the Lord's AGE as their datelines. See Bible Dateline Meters for more info. Latest thread is at: frankforum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=532&p=2356#p2356

• Forum Thread discussing PATU

• Genesis 1 Meter

• Psalm 90:1-17 BHS Text, parsed Meter +Metered English Translation
• God's Play of History: Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 and Eph1:3-14
• Judges.xls

• Matthew 24 Meter Forum Thread
• Matthew 24-25 Prophecy of Christian Impact on World During Church Age
• Luke 21:5-36 Meter (prophecy of West's future, meter wraps to Eph1:3-14)

IMPORTANT CORRECTION: When I talk about 1960, I mention Falwell. He wasn't the focus of that year, but rather Billy Graham, who GETS THE GOSPEL WRONG and switches to a social gospel, as far back as 1958, Billy Graham Classic Crusade - The Cross (1958)

1959, he visits RUSSIA for the first time and wants to spread his false gospel THERE. So then does, over the next several decades. THAT is the tie Bible develops, IN ADDITION to the politicizing that Falwell would come to specialize in, and yes starting with Nixon. But GRAHAM was there in 1975 when Francis Schaeffer came up with his false vision of #SevenMountains, and GRAHAM was his friend then. Both his and Schaeffer's sons were pals (q.v., the God in America link in commentsw below).

The #TrumpRussia connection begins way back in the 1960s. A guy on Twitter has been tracing it, replete with legal records he pays to get (so donate to him, if you're inclined): https://twitter.com/patrickLSimpson/status/977974360517509120 (account has since been terminated)

I didn't know ANY of this when making the video here. So that means the full scope of the meaning is not yet presented. SORRY!

---

PBS did a series called God in America which (unknowingly) helps elucidate what the Bible is saying, here. https://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/view/

Its final two parts (final episode, really, 2 hours) focuses on the time period in Matt25:10, and places Falwell's activism starting AFTER the Seven Mountains vision of Schaeffer, Bright, Cunningham (that vision isn't mentioned in the film), spurred onto it by Schaeffer. So that conflicts with what I said, which is based on other reports. Maybe the film is more correct, in which case that 1975 vision IS KEY to the whole denouement we see today.

LAST HOUR ESPECIALLY PROVES THAT THE ABORTION THINGY WAS TRUMPED UP TO GET VOTES, that evangelicals WERE NOT INTERESTED IN THE ABORTION ISSUE post Roe v Wade UNTIL SCHAEFFER'S SON CONVINCED HIS DAD TO CONVINCE JERRY FALWELL TO CALL IT MURDER. Till then, Falwell only wanted to preach Bible.

THE WHOLE ABORTION PROLIFE THINGY IS A SCAM FROM THE GETGO.

---

IMPORTANT: when I did this video, I did not yet know how vast and worldwide the connections are. I didn't know the RUSSIAN connection of ThirdRome (a plan to take over the world, Russia's own self-image since 1500s), nor much of the RECONSTRUCTIONIST movement beginning in late 1950s (which this video covers but without mentioning them). My pastor was (back then) screaming against those people, but I didn't think to connect them when making this video. They are a morphing from Replacement Theology, VERY VERY anti-semitic, and SevenMountains is an update on Reconstructionism, which is an update on Replacement Theology (which has been around since Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen). VILE EVIL that gave birth to CONSTANTINE'S ROME in CONSTANTINOPLE, the ROME of Revelation 17.

But I know now, as of this writing. Amazing how learning this prophetical timeline can unveil so much that's hiding in plain sight to prove yeah, the interp is accurate. Whew. Still vetting, tho.

See: Dominionism Rising: A Theocratic Movement Hiding in Plain Sight

---

ERRATUM: at 54:20 or so I mistakenly said Messiah had to be born 1000 years after David died. I meant Messiah had to DIE by then; it's the outer limit of time in Daniel 9:26, but scholars miss it, because they mistakenly use lunar years when counting Dan 9's years, and they mistakenly use Josephus rather than 1Kings 6:1, to know David died age 77 not age 70.

So look how convenient: if you used solar years as Bible always does, you'd realize the timeline is SEVEN YEARS LONGER (yeah, because David died seven years later). So their two errors self-cancel, and for centuries they don't catch on. Never mind, they also then can't get the whole Bible timeline right from David onward, for the same reason, and still argue over it today.

---

ERRATUM: at 42:50 I mistakenly said 1960-2041 was 40 years. I meant 1960-2001, but it depends on the fiscal used, as to HOW it's 40 rather than 41. But that's still the point of the period, and it still seems to be analogous to the 80-year rule of Joseph, but I have to analyze that idea more, lest it be a mere time-period coincidence.

How Satan Deploys Islam, playlist mentioned at 46:32 and following, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk-MIH7IvTg&list=PL90D90E03E31E6D55&index=7

---

At 33:17, I mentioned the Trump blasphemy in a video of his Liberty U speech. Here's that video, and you only have to listen to the first min to hear him REPLACE the Holy Spirit, who in 2Cor3:17 which Trump quotes, is the One protecting your liberty. But DT says HE will do it, instead! God thus advertises Himself as #NeverTrump.

Video: Donald Trump: "Two Corinthians..." (C-SPAN)

---

I decided to put the 30 characteristics (at 5:10 in video) here: BibleHebMeterCharacs.htm. So now you can take any passage in Bible and test it, in the original mss. Won't work with translations.

---

The Greek syntax of Matt25:10 tells you what happened, so I translated it live which your own translation will largely confirm. Basically, the apostates then left Christ for politics, illustrated by Falwell senior, Robertson, all the jerk TBN types today. It was THE phenomenon of the 1960s to counter the Dems playing the race card, so you shouldn't have trouble confirming the meaning.

So by 1998, end of Matt25:10b, Christ had arrived (through good advanced Bible teaching, more ms discoveries, etc. — the interim meaning of a prophecy later to be fulfilled literally) and shut the door with those wanting to learn Him rather than politics. In short, that's how long it took for the polarization of wise vs. foolish to occur (trend since 1703 AD when Chapter opens).

You can prove that too, by the wild pulpit changes in the foolish agitating for politics as if it were spiritual, especially the vile prolife crowd. My own pastor, not knowing this meter, went around the country in 1998 warning of this shift, wondering if the US had only 40 years left cuz we'd gone so saltless (violating John 18:36). Which is ironic, as in the older 1960s he too had been caught up in the politics, you can hear him rant in the early classes while exegeting the Greek/Hebrew (he daily taught Bible line by line in the original ms, that's why I can read Bible in Hebrew/Greek).

But all this is just hearsay to you. Better to use 1Jn1:9 and ask God to show you proof as you need to see it. The most important goal of this process is the bi-directional interplay of learning and living on Bible and getting feedback from the Holy Spirit. It's very academic and fulfilling. So do that, see what happens.

• Luke's Meter Forum Thread
• Luke Dateline Meters
• Luke 21:5-36 Meter (prophecy of West's future, meter wraps to Eph1:3-14)

• Daniel 9 Meter Forum Thread
• Daniel 9:4-19, Hebrew with Meter Parsing and Notes
• Daniel 9:24-25 Meter Parsing
• God's Play of History: Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 and Eph1:3-14
• Temple started 3.5 years late (forum thread)

Meter often certifies doctrines we already knew; but its most surprising function is to 'track' Pre-Tribulation Rapture. All New Testament meter plays on Daniel 9:24-27. Daniel 9:4-19, and 24-27, are metered; so too Isaiah 1:1, Chapter 53 and Psalm 90. The passages 'tag' each other by meter as cross-reference concordance. The most frequent 'tag' is syllable 133, tagging Psalm 90:7 and Isaiah 53:2. Bible writers just mentioned (and Mary plus Zecharias), tag those passages so the reader can match CONTENT to whatever the later writer/speaker means to say.

To grasp Daniel 9, you must know his meter; it's based on Isaiah 53's. God ALSO uses Isaiah 53's meter in Daniel 9:24-27, to reaffirm Timeline for Temple reconstruction. For Isaiah tells it first, in 712BC. His meter reminded Jewish believers of that future, just as you'd use a calendar, by SYLLABLE COUNTS. For Jews already had to count them, to test memorization and copying. God thus needn't but parse the timeline, in His Reply via Gavriel; so Daniel isn't surprised and asks no questions. To us in English, Daniel 9's numbers jump from nowhere, so we don't know WHY those numbers. But in Hebrew and New Testament Greek, it's referenced all over: for Temple depicts Messiah.

It's a genre: TIME meters syntactically divisible by 7. Meter interacts with text (as in Daniel 9). 1 consonantal sound + 1 vowel sound = 1 syllable = 1 year. No additions; subtract only for elision. Time is accounted backward then forward full-circle from Adam's Fall to a scheduled (pre-Church) Millennium, had Israel accepted Christ. Since she didn't, New Testament meters stop @62nd week (Ephesians 1:3-14 = 434 syllables).

• 1 Peter 1:1-12 Meter
• 2 Peter 1:1-4 Dateline Meter
• Peter's Christian Soldier Marching Song (Interleaved with Ephesians 1:3-14), with Metered Translation

• Hebrews 1:1-4 Dateline Meter

• David's Last Words, 2Sam23 DATELINE METER Forum Thread
• 2Sam23:1-5 Dateline of David's Last Words

• Putative Dateline Meter in James
• Luke 1:46-55, 'Magnificat' Meter of Time and Metered Translation

• Luke Dateline Meters

• Mark 13 Meter Forum Thread
• Mark 13 Meter (prophecy of Byzantine Empire)
• Mark's Revised Dateline Meter

• Jude 1-3 Dateline Meter

• 1 Thess 1:1-5 Dateline Meter
• 2 Thess 1:1-5 Dateline Meter
• Romans 1:1-7 Dateline Meter
• 1 Corinthians 1:1-3 Dateline Meter
• 2 Corinthians 1:1-3 Dateline Meter
• Ephesians 1:3-14, Paul's Meter of Church Time

• John's Meter Forum Thread
• John's Gospel Dateline Meter
• John's Revelation 'Map'

• Isaiah 52:13~15 Weaving
• Isaiah 52:13-54:1, Working, Expanded, and Poetic Translations, w/ Exegetical Notes +videos on Psalm 90's Hebrew Meter and keywords
• Isaiah 53:10-12: BHS/LXX Amalgamated Translation w/ Exegetical Notes
• Isaiah 53 Meter Translated in English
• God's Play of History: Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 and Eph1:3-14

February 2011 update: I've reversed my contention that Hebrew text is missing from Isaiah 53. By Isaiah's Hebrew meter pattern, you can prove that no text is missing. You can also prove it, I just learned, by examining the interplay between Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53, Daniel 9's prayer and of all things, Ephesians 1:3-14's Greek!

---

Videos don't display well. So you may need to download some of their JPG pictures. These follow below:

Updated vector to show the stages of initial manual parsing of the chapter which isn't clear in the Isaiah 53 Meter Key video:

Associated page: Isaiah 52:13~15 Weaving.

• Hypothesis #1 presumes that 14 syllables are deliberately missing in Isaiah 53, with the extra 7 (to make 490) being supplied by the putatively-missing Hebrew text in Isaiah 53:11. So Isa53gold2.JPG shows 469 syllables, the 'control' from which Hypothesis #1 - #4 are crafted.
• Hypothesis #2 still adds the above text, and I can 'find' 14 extra syllables in verses 53:5-8 if I change elision assumptions. Isa53Hypo2.JPG shows them. So in Hypothesis #2, the total syllables would be 490, not the 469.
• Hypothesis #3 is that the 469 syllables you see are deliberate, and therefore the LXX translation in 53:10-11 is explanatory of the poetic ellipsis in 53:10-11. When you say those verses aloud you can feel the dramatic ellipsis, so the argument in favor of the text we have AS we have it, is strong. To test that, I made that video to sleuth out how the LXX compares, to see if there are any other things missing versus the Hebrew.
• Hypothesis #4 is like #3, but balances internally, and is short 28 syllables, not 21. It's the most likely answer because its internal meter accounting deliberately mirrors without any syllables missing (so no text is missing in Hebrew).

The broader doctrine of how God Orchestrates Time is in the following links:

1. Timeline Spreadsheet from Adam through 2007. Cell A2 has a popup note summarizing how God grants time. Suggest you view worksheet wide-screen, but half-deep. Use Excel's "View" then "Custom View" to access Time subsections (i.e., "David", "1st Temple", etc). Use Freeze Titles on cell B14 for best results. Associated Youtube video.
2. Also in Cell A2 is the Word doc covering actual history showing how God orchestrates time using His Rules in the Bible, to preserve mankind; its #9 is important. Its #9 (p.13ff) covers the derivation of the 70-year and 50-year voting periods and how God uses them in history. That meaning is essential to Isaiah's Meter. Doc also covers mistakes scholars & pastors make which prevent them from seeing Bible's dating system.
3. In-depth Doctrine of How God Orchestrates Time: Mirroring Timeline. All time accounting units are explained (i.e., 1 year, 7 years, 40 years, etc.) but focus is on the Justice Accounting Doctrine of Time itself. There is an in-depth tracing of each person granted time from Adam through Christ, with Bible verses on how spreadsheet numbers were derived. "Mirroring" is a redemptive 'reimbursement' of Time well spent. Time lost is debited, but regained if certain conditions are met (i.e., Daniel 9).
4. Passover Plot, Lord's Birth & Death dates, chronology of Jewish Calendar to see God's Macro Orchestration of Time & Passion Week. His Birth & Death dates were predicted exactly, but you must know God's Time Accounting system to find them in Bible. God 'balances' Israel's own calendar, in designing those dates.

• Philemon 1-6 Dateline Meter

• Titus v1-4 Dateline Meter

• Revelation 17 Meter Forum Thread
• Revelation 17:1-18 Meter (prophecy of Rise of Gentile Anti-Christ as Fake Church)
  • Fix by adding 7
• John's Revelation 'Map'

An example of what I mean with the hieroglyphs, and a snippet of Genesis 1:1-5 in the Hebrew for comparison:

Description	Ashuri	Paleo-Hebrew	Proto-Sinaitic	Egyptian (Primary)	Egyptian (Secondary)
Aleph: ox, offering	א	𐤀	א	𓃾
Beth: house, shelter	ב	𐤁	ב	𓉐	𓉔
Gimel: throwing stick, create	ג	𐤂	ג	𓌙	𓌚
Dalet: fish, introduce, open	ד	𐤃	ד	𓆟	𓉿
Heh: man, rejoice, worship	ה	𐤄	ה	𓀠
Waw: mace, damage, bright, white, command, decree, subjects	ו	𐤅	ו	𓌉	𓎗, 𓅚
Zayin: die, sword, duality	ז	𐤆	ז	𓏱	𓏭, 𓍡
Heth: (irrigation) canals, connecting, fence, threading	ח	𐤇	ח	𓈇	𓈈, 𓎛, 𓊐
Teth: beauty, good	ט	𐤈	ט	𓄤
Yodh: hand, raise, lift	י	𐤉	י	𓂝	𓍟, 𓍞
Kaph: palm	ך - כ	𐤊	כ	𓂧
Lamedh: crook, flock, rule, authority	ל	𐤋	ל	𓋿	𓋾
Mem: water	ם - מ	𐤌	מ	𓈖
Nun: cobra, snake	ן - נ	𐤍	נ	𓆓
Samekh: column, support, stability	ס	𐤎	ס	𓊽
Ayin: eye, 'to do', make	ע	𐤏	ע	𓁹
Pe: corner, court, occupations, magistrates, mouth	ף - פ	𐤐	פ	𓊋	𓀅, 𓂋
Tsade: plant, germination	ץ - צ	𐤑	צ	𓇑
Kuf: baboon, monkey, cryptography, furious	ק	𐤒	ק	𓃻	𓃷
Resh: head, first, chief	ר	𐤓	ר	𓁶	𓂉
Shin: composite bow, stretch, tooth	ש	𐤔	ש	𓌔
Taw: owner's mark, to pass	ת	𐤕	ת	𓏴

Here is the full chart displaying the modern Ashuri Hebrew characters compared to the older characters until it reaches the Egyptian glyphs that inspired the characters, along with a description of what they were originally implying. Anything in red text is what I'm doubtful of. Of course this is my interpretation of the glyphs and I've done my best to associate them based on multiple sources. For instance, while you could use "𓃸" for Kuf, "𓃻" makes more sense based on the Proto-Sinaitic representation of a figure 8 where the baboon is in a sitting pose. And while dalet is sometimes a door (𓉿), I've opted for its fish variant. This is where Proto-Sinaitic gets tricky as sometimes multiple hieroglyphs were sometimes used to reference one thing. I updated the chart to include all of the 'secondary' hieroglyphs. If I encounter any problems with this interpretation I will update it accordingly. Some Proto-Sinaitic was very similar to the 𓉔 hieroglyph (they were probably used interchangeably) but the converter only uses the 'primary' glyphs.

There's a shockingly large void of Proto-Sinaitic material so some of the characters have some variances on that front as well; it's rather curious as at some point there'd have been an overwhelming amount of documents written in Proto-Sinaitic and perhaps even just with the Egyptian hieroglyphs themselves, but why this historical void exists is anyone's guess.

As a result of Egypt's strong influence and cross-pollination to both the writing and Hebrew pronunciations, I do not believe "Vav" ever had a V and was originally Waw. This sound would have been unusual in Ancient Egypt as it didn't exist according to what we know about Egyptian, so too, it wouldn't make sense to exist for the Hebrew, either. I know this topic is hotly debated but from an academic, scientific, and cultural perspective having a V does not make sense.

1. I had heth as 𓉗 (fence/perimeter), but going through the hieroglyphs 𓈇 looks to be a lot closer. It's an irrigation canal. There's also a plain canal "𓈘" which is close, too. It appears the inspiration for this was actually an (irrigation) canal and not a regular enclosure or fence, when William Foxwell Albright suggested a fence he wasn't sure himself. A canal is the most logical choice although the representation of a fence/perimeter 𓊐 is also quite visually similar 𓈈 so maybe there was a connection at some point? Some said heth should be "𓎛"; as this is just a wick I think it was probably just used for the "h" sound and not a pictographic relationship when being used.
2. I had zayin as 𓏭 due to reference from another source, but looking at the hieroglyphs myself, this is definitely matching to 𓏱 (both the Proto-Sinaitic pictogram and Egyptian meaning of this glyph), it's so obvious that I don't know why sources don't immediately notice this? A notable mention is the pitchfork as well 𓍡.

3. I changed 𓋾 to 𓋿. While Proto-Sinaitic sometimes used both, the original concept was for a flock, and the Egyptian royal sceptre (𓋾) is in essence quite different from the literal Shepherd's crook (𓋿); modern audiences may gloss over this historical nuance. I never paid close attention when people were referencing the Egyptian sceptre as the Shepherd's crook, so that's on me for blindly using the sceptre. Both kind of pertain to authority, though — and that's where Proto-Sinaitic gets confusing when it referenced simultaneous concepts.
4. Overhauled and aligned the descriptions against Gardiner's, also added secondary glyphs and their meanings. My additions to Yodh appear to be novel; the visual similarities and even meanings seem to align. My additions to Waw appear to be novel, but 𓎗 is visually similar, I do not think it should apply to Kuf. I do not think Shin actually references "breast" and "tooth" but I left tooth because if Heth had some sort of legacy association with 𓊐, maybe the same applies to Shin? Some of these references are mirrored in the Mathers table which adds to their suspiciousness. It also happens to reverse the meaning of certain hieroglyphs; for instance Nun becomes fish and for "faithfulness" which is the opposite of its Egyptian 'snake' meaning (and since it's used for Satan it's easy to 'proof' much of these meanings came later or were changed thousands of years after the fact). So the Kabbalah references are predictably garbled or unreliable at best and should not be consulted.

5. Added 𓅚 to Waw as a secondary meaning. Some sources seem to want to add a fowl as its secondary meaning, but I'm not sure why (it could also have no bearing on the context of Hebrew itself). While you could choose any one of the bird hieroglyphs, the 'fowl' I chose (guineafowl) was specifically due to the fact it complements command/decree of the mace hieroglyph via people or subjects. I also omitted "Vav" to emphasise the fact that Hebrew never had a "V" sound during Ancient Egypt.
6. Added "threading" as a potential meaning to Heth, since I keep seeing it come up: but that ties into its whole concept of canals and connecting stuff.

If we were to assume portions of the Old Testament were written first in Proto-Sinaitic before it moved onto Ktav Ivri and ultimately into Masoretic, this is how I would date it accordingly:

• Proto-Sinaitic 1450 BC
• Ktav Ivri / Paleo-Hebrew 1000 BC
• Ktav Ashuri 500 BC
• Ashuri Masoretic Addtions 500 AD

Keep in mind this is under the assumption it was first written in Proto-Sinaitic, as there currently exist no proof it's only hypothetical. Considering Egyptian writing and culture were prevalent during Moses and Joseph, it's not out of the realm of possibility multiple writing systems were interchanged and people 'just knew' the pictograms of all of them back then. There's also nothing saying that portions of the Old Testament was written in just one of the writing systems, it could have been multiples before being consolidated into Ashuri. Unfortunately as Antiochus IV Epiphanes destroyed many Old Testament manuscripts and the Jews continue to be persecuted throughout history, not many copies of anything remain. Without the Leningrad Codex much would have been lost.

If we were to make an educated guess as to what God Himself used for the tablets, Proto-Sinaitic over Paleo-Hebrew makes the most sense; given the literacy and circumstance of the Israelites at the time. It would have been very interesting to see God's aesthetic choice of the glyphs if that were the case: they would have all been carved perfectly with a mathematical molecular precision impossible to replicate with machinery. Of course I doubt the "Exodus generation" at the time really cared about such things. 😛

Unfortunately as I was researching this, there are apparently some Christians who get nutty and start modifying the symbols to selectively bend to what they want to imagine (that also goes against the Egyptian, I might add) or then claim God has hidden meanings: there's never going to be hidden meaning with the pictograms they'll always be obvious and in the open related to the vocabulary they're to represent. In fact, claiming God was hiding knowledge is exactly what Satan used to tempt Eve (and continues to use as a plot against the Church): so Christians saying God is hiding anything is basically promoting Satan's temptation.

I think some of this ties into the aforementioned Kabbalah references, but that's a dark path to go down: it's not scientific and will eventually make you crazy seeing meanings where there are none. Just don't. Move onto something more productive in your life.

While I was initially extremely hesitant to acknowledge there was an association with the vocabulary and pictograms (I only wanted to see what it would have 'looked like' with the inspired hieroglyphs), it does appear that there is. I kept seeing so many that I'm confident in saying it's no longer a coincidence. Even with my first revision of the Hebrew-to-Egyptian glyphs, I have noticed some interesting things when inputting a few famous Hebrew words.

Satan: שטן 𓆓𓄤𓌔

For 'Satan': the beginning glyph is a composite bow (which can refer to "stretching out"), the centre glyph means 'beauty' or 'good' and then the ending glyph is a snake, almost like it's saying: 'good' which is being 'stretched out' that has turned into evil (snake), or, beauty that masquerades as a snake. I'm just guessing, but the contrast of having both good/evil in one word like that is too much of a coincidence to ignore. Originally I thought the bow may have referred to Satan placing a target on our backs, but I think that's too much of a leap of logic with a modern bias.

Elohim: אלהים 𓈖𓂝𓀠𓋿𓃾

For 'Elohim' it begins with an ox head followed by a cane potentially implying that God has authority over all humans and animals? And for the hand giving water, God is the one who gives / raises the water of life (𓈖𓂝)? Or possibly emphasis in Genesis 1 with God restoring the waters.

Hallelujah: הללו־יה 𓀠𓂝־𓌉𓋿𓋿𓀠

Hallelujah begins and terminates with one of the cheering 'worshippers'.

Rechem: רחם 𓈖𓈇𓁶

The word "rechem" refers to womb, and the pictograms for this one are actually probably the most related to any I've seen thus far. It starts off with the 'head' followed by (irrigation) canals leading into water. If that's not an allusion to the process of birth, I don't know what is!

Shabbat: שבת 𓏴𓉐𓌔

'Sabbath' almost seems like it's depicting the following: do not stretch yourself by not resting (composite bow), stay inside (house), do not leave until the right time has passed (cross). I looked this up after I completed my interpretation so I would not have bias, Jeff Benner's interpretation is: "return to the covenant" (using the "tooth" and "tent" to refer to pressing and therefore return). I'm not convinced the composite bow ever referred to "tooth" but rather "stretching". The sabbath was really about resting so staying home to not "stretch yourself" makes more sense, but perhaps this is too modern of a perspective. I will hasten to add many (all?) who deal with the Hebrew omit the 'stretching' meaning of the bow that the Egyptian implied, but it solves a lot of problems with the meanings.

Adamah & Adam: אדמה & אדם
𓈖𓆟𓃾 & 𓀠𓈖𓆟𓃾

It's interesting to me how both Adam and Adamah have two of the animals (of whom Adam originally named), along with Adamah even terminating with a little man. "Adam" itself is a bit of a joke meaning "earth-man".

Qol "voice of God": קוֹל 𓋿𓌉𓃻

Qadosh "Holy 3x": קָד֛וֹשׁ 𓌔𓌉𓆟𓃻

I'm wondering if many of the words associated with God, have baboons simply for the humour factor. God being the author of humour, often uses it to communicate to people when they get too close minded.

Ets: עֵץ 𓇑𓁹

It's interesting that the word for tree "ets" has an eye 'looking' at a plant. The hieroglyphic meaning would be: "to (make) germinate".

---

Obviously these are not 'hidden meanings' as the pictograms only appear to augment the vocabulary itself (which again, is a strong case that it began in Hebrew). If you think about ancient cultures back then, associating pictograms would have also made it more obvious to people who may have not been formally educated. You don't need to learn proprietary vocabulary, you can just stare at the picture to see what it means visibly in the open, nothing hidden about it. If someone showed me the pictograms for 𓆓𓄤𓌔, and I was familiar with them during the period, it's pretty obvious to see at a glance how that would refer to Satan. In modern times where everyone is educated to read and write none of this is necessary anymore, so it only serves as a historical curiosity and glimpse of cultures in the past.

Revisionist history through linguistic imperialism appears to be a common malady when scholars discuss Paleo-Hebrew. Dominant academic narratives tend to prioritise calling it Phoenician; advising this is what inspired Paleo-Hebrew rather than the other way around — despite physical evidence proving the contrary. For instance, the oldest known Paleo-Hebrew on the Ketef Hinnom scrolls (600 BC) predates the oldest Phoenician ostraca (at a suggestive 510 BC ~ 323 BC). Stone itself cannot be used for objective dating because the medium predates when it was written to: perfect for selective historiography, though! So all of the academic suggestions of Phoenician written on stone predating the Paleo-Hebrew is an assumption. Not to mention, there's already Paleo-Hebrew written to stone... like the Siloam inscription (guesstimated at 700 BC), or the Tel Dan stele (guesstimated at 870 BC ~ 750 BC). Of course they guesstimate the Phoenician Ahiram sarcophagus at a much more generous 1000 BC 🤣. I could bring up the Izbet Sartah ostracon (1200 BC ~ 901 BC), but surprise, even this is contested if it's Hebrew at all. I'm certain the Ketef Hinnom scrolls were a source of anger for many scholars and zealots who want a different narrative about Hebrew.

Since the pictograms line up with the ancient Hebrew, this is decent proof Proto-Sinaitic/Paleo-Hebrew was of Jewish origin and not Phoenician as some journalists with an antisemitic bias or the World Economic Forum claim; the alphabet itself appears to have been designed around Hebrew and anything that loans Hebrew words. The later languages (which is pretty much all) that borrowed Paleo-Hebrew and Proto-Sinaitic lost that intrinsic pictographic-vocabulary relationship. Except in certain areas where Phoenician borrows from ancient Hebrew (i.e. taking "Elohim" and shortening it into just "El" — which I actually think is a parody to mock God's surname ("Elohim" is like a surname to all three members of the trinity). It's also suspiciously on-brand for how antisemitic the world is regarding Jewish history and culture. The ancient people of the past would have been familiar with these hieroglyphs no doubt, and obviously the Israelites were influenced and influenced others; but the Paleo-Hebrew is of Jewish origin without doubt. Everything else that came much later (yes, even Arabic) was influenced from the ancient Hebrew. The earliest preserved Islamic Arabic (that's not stone) is PERF 558 from 643 AD.

The linguistic genocide of Hebrew doesn't stop at scholars trying to pass the Paleo-Hebrew glyphs off as Phoenician in origin. A modern example: how Ta'anakh in Palestine (תַּעְנַךְ) was renamed Ti'inik (تعنّك). A deliberate revision through Arabic that resembles the original ancient Hebrew just enough: a post-facto overlay with the intent to revise history. They had a choice to invent a new novel Arabic word, and they didn't. This same post-facto overlay tactic is what Russia uses against Ukraine, renaming Kyiv to Kiev. Russia could have created a whole new word or aligned the transliteration of Kyiv to Кийив if they wanted to get creative using their set of Cyrillic characters. But guess what! Ки́їв is still standard Cyrillic! They want to eradicate "ї" so that their flavour of Cyrillic is what's remembered and becomes the de facto).

When designing this converter, it was never my intention to investigate how Jewish history was being obfuscated or rewritten (and I never thought much of calling Paleo-Hebrew, "Phoenician". In fact, I thought it was Phoenician from what most sources were saying). One thing lead to another with obvious inconsistencies in mainstream academia, and I came to the above startling conclusions through a scientific and organic process.