Meter Quick Links
← Poetic Meter Resource Index
← Poetic Meter Forum Threads
← Poetic Meter Excel Docs + Webpages
← Poetic Meter Word Docs + Webpages
← Downloads Index (All Files)
Meter Colour Legend:
Web address: http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc; pdf: http://www.brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf
.
Helpful Reading Tips (pre-Word 2007 versions)
A. Select Tools, Options, View Tab, then check
Screen Tips box, to see link destinations on mouse-over. Saves time.
B. Select Tools, Customize, then select Commands
tab; scroll down the left to find 'Web'; and then scroll on the right to find
the Back and Forward light-blue arrow buttons. Drag them to your icon line for
browser-like navigation. If a section seems blank, scroll or page back and
forth, and the text will reappear (Word bug).
C. Colors:
To eliminate (i.e., yellow) highlights, hit Control-A, then
choose Borders and Shading TEXT, and 'No Fill'. To do that only for a section: in lieu of
Control-A, first 'paint' the section.
Same idea for changing font colors.
Do not change font sizes: use Zoom instead. To change link
colors: Change the 'hyperlink' color in Styles and Formatting to your
preference.
Table of Contents
(Click on an
underlined section below, to go to it)
Doctrine
of How God Orchestrates Time
Associated Doc and Webpage Links
Separate Meter-maps for Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9
Greek of Eph
1:3-14 and Metered Translation
Individual
Verses: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Individual verse
Notes: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Verse 4's Note on 77 Syllables Meter Tagging
Styles
The Anaphora: eudokian epainon TempleTrio Interplay Overlap 33 sevens 45 sevens 78 sevens 94 sevens
The Assets: apolutrwsin aphesin sophia musterion proetheto prothesin proelpikotas
Pregnancy 1
Pregnancy1b Meter Meaning
Pregnancy 2 Pregnant
14 Palindromes
('Pregnancy'=
accounting precedence for the Rapture)
Paul's
Chronology Use of Meter
Chronology Chart
Church Father Hall
of Shame Conclusions Appendix II:
Diocletian's Death
Appendix I: Anaphora
Chronology 1st eudokian 2nd eudokian 3rd eudokian
1st epainon 2nd epainon 3rd epainon
Time Balance Summary epainon Bal Bible Time Distances
Year 1077s
BC/AD Balance
Quirinius
Herod Temp Trio Bal
Preface to
Ephesians 1:3-14,
Paul's
Meter of Church Time
Go
to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
To
comprehend Ephesians, you must know Paul's meter from the Greek; but to know his meter, you first need to know
its underlying Doctrine of Time.
Bible Hebrew meter, which Paul uses here in Greek, conveys a doctrine
about How God Orchestrates Time.
It runs pan-Bible, so has been used for 1500 years. Undetected, by Christendom.
All prophecy is an accounting, primarily.
All the prophetical events are accounted, to 'obey' this
Doctrine's Rules. So, the Time
Rules are encoded metrically, since Israel had to memorize Scripture orally. This made the Rules, easy to remember. Hence this meter is extensively used in the
Old Testament, yet scholars don't know about it. They've debated whether OT Bible Hebrew even has
meter, for over 300 years. They can't
discern that meter, since they impose Western ideas of poetry meter, on
the Bible text.
Most
of the scholars involved in the debate over Hebrew meter, are preterists and
Replacement Theologians. So it's not to
their advantage, to 'find' a meter which disproves preterism, which disproves
Replacement Theology, since both 'doctrines' cut out the Jews from God's
Promises; just like Harold Camping did recently, his Mad-Magazine numbers
loudly and laughably predicting the world's end on May 21-now-October 21, 2011. The world, justifiably snickers. Bible is a casualty. Bible looks Bad. Not fair.
For
God's Prophecy concerns the JEWs, and we Church weren't supposed to be here,
Romans 11. We got 'grafted in', only because Israel
rejected Christ and He contracted to BUILD CHURCH, starting in Matthew
16:18, specifically asking for it per Father's Discretion (hence Rapture is pre-Trib and cannot be
predicted),
in John 17:17-26.
Little
wonder then, that 'scholars' debate what even constitutes a syllable, in
Hebrew. Yet every Jew has always
known: consonant to consonant,
one syllable. The next consonant begins the next syllable,
and sometimes also ends the prior syllable; certain consonant combinations
unite into one syllable. So you
only concern yourself with vowel elision, a stringing-together of sound which
occurs in every language; and in Hebrew, also the waw might be elided (nowadays called vav). No
need to play games with the text, no artificial-sounding recitation as in
today's Judaism (harsh
Sephardic tones),
just read the text. Which in writing, is easy to parse. No confusion.
Once Christendom appreciates God's
rhetorical device of metering Time to match verse content, every denomination
will want to retool its ideas of hermeneutics, textual criticism, and above all,
eschatology. So obviously, much up-front explanation is
required; for much debate will
justifiably ensue.
No
one likes hearing he's been remiss in his Bible understanding, i.e., the fact
that everyone accounts years as lunar, but BIBLE NEVER DOES. So Christendom as well as Judaism, constantly
get Bible's dates wrong; Bible doesn't seem to balance, and oh you must just
take it on faith, as if we're doing God a favor. Bible only uses solar years, but we use
lunar, then claim Bible wrong, obtuse, or (yikes!) "inscrutable"! Camping played games on Bible math. He's not alone. Scholars routinely ignore the EXTRA SEVEN
YEARS in Daniel 9, claiming they are lunar years. NO!
On
the other hand, we all like hearing our faith in Bible, vindicated. That's another certain conclusion, in what
follows. God is Trustworthy. He did preserve His Word. You can rely on it, and once you see how
God proves He orchestrated HISTORY YOU CAN TEST, you'll feel MUCH better
about Bible's Divinity.
By
the way, you needn't credit 'brainout' for this material; nor did I use anything copyrighted, to derive
it. I think the point of 'my' getting
it, was to prove a) even a brainout can know this, and b) to save
scholars and pastors, vetting time.
For I know this material, only because I asked God for Bible proof
of a doctrine my pastor long taught:
that God uses Believers To Buy
Time. [Christendom generally
calls this 'salt of the earth'.] He
called it 'Blessing by Association', but he didn't know there were
explicit AMOUNTS of Time. I learned
that, when sleuthing to see what he meant by 'Buying Time.'
So if YOU also come
to see its Biblical validity, YOU own it.
For it's BIBLE's data, not 'brainout's'.
Different 'B'. I
know this is controversial material, and yet it's mostly correct. So each day I throw stones at it; I hope you
will, too. Obviously to the extent
correct, it's of GOD, not 'brainout'.
And that's the ONLY 'B', which matters.
So I hope you'll tell me, where you find my errors.
Preface, How God Constructs
Time
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14
Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
So Bible
does indeed use meter,
to Account for Time.
Because, Israel was on a SCHEDULE God set up at Adam's Fall. For the rhetorical-style uses of meter, click here for the Meter Notes' section, read bullets prior to Note A.
This document will
show how Paul employs meter; especially, how he 'tags' specific passages metrically
in Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9. Thus you gain precise
certitude on how to read and interpret, Ephesians. And you know something else: everyone used to
be familiar with these Rules, just as we know our abcs.
So what is this Doctrine of How God
Orchestrates Time? Briefly, it goes like
this:
[Extensive documentation of what follows is in
the Video and
Webpage links pages of this
Preface.]
o Time is a LOAN. So it must be 'paid' by someone voting for
God. Else, TIME ENDS.
o This LOAN is in
specific units, each with its own voting 'audience' and purpose.
o First Unit, a 490, during which at
least ONE BELIEVER must spiritually SUPERMATURE. Else, Time Ends. Per
Bible, Adam was the first to supermature, as indicated by the 'present' of his
son Seth (Appointed-to-Carry-the-Name).
Genesis 5 is a roster of those who Voted and Supermatured. That's its primary purpose, to Track Time
Grants Being Met. The sons' births are TIMED;
and when you crunch the math, you learn that, for example, there were
490 years between Seth's birth and Enoch's, showing that Jared also
supermatured at the last minute. (Nerd Note: Age rounding
means that there might be a 1-2 year variance in the math.) Same 490, between the births of Shem and
Isaac.
o Second Unit is a 70, following
the 490
if it successfully completed
(someone
supermatured during that Unit). During this 70, BELIEVERS EN MASSE
must Vote To Learn God. The 'mass', can
be as small as one (i.e., Noah, who voted
during his own 70). Else, Time Ends for those who didn't
vote. (Hence the Flood.)
o
Third Unit, is another 490, following
the 70,
if the latter successfully completed. Again,
at least One Believer must spiritually supermature. Else, Time Ends.
o Unit Four, the Sum: 1050 (490+70+490), constitutes
God's Basic 'house' of Time. It 'funds'
the ability of unbelievers to Vote To Be Saved. Gospel
is always the same in any time period: you BELIEVE in the Future Savior Who
Will Pay For Your Sins (aka
Messiah, in Hebrew): and thus
are saved from Hell and to Heaven.. forever.
o
So
notice Unit Four, the 1050 is also constructed
of 50's: there are 21 of them. So, 1000+50 constitutes twenty 50's, plus
one. (Hence the term 'millennium' in a generic
sense. Really, 1000+50, not 1000. But in shorthand, 1000.)
o So Unit Five, is a
special unbeliever-voting window during the last 50 years of the 1050. Notice how it piggybacks onto the last 50
years of the last 490,
thus signifying that unbeliever votes depend on believers, voting. (Nerd Note: this is precedence for the
sabbatical years, for Pentecost and
Jubilee, covered here passim.)
o
So the 1000 is a 'civilization' unit, with a '50' at the
end; so the 'house' of 1050 contains both
believers and unbelievers, each with a TIME promise and a TIME warning, if they
don't vote for God.
o
TIME ENDS for those who don't vote for
God. That's the basic
point, so is precedence for the sudden-death nature of the Rapture;
which Paul will stress, in this passage.
o
For the Millennium was predicted to arrive in the year
4200 from Adam's Fall,
ever since the Exodus (and
maybe prior, I can't yet prove what prior knowledge, of a 2nd 2100). The first two units ran 2100 years, for the
Gentiles. The second 2100 was for the
Jews. Jews today even know this, but
they account 2000 each, not 2100.
And they use a bad calendar, patterned after the Seder Olam Rabbah. Google on that term.
o
Messiah was SCHEDULED to die 57 years before the end of
the second 2100; hence when the Jews rejected Him, there
was no more time left. There was no more time left, because Abraham matured
EARLY, so that 57 was 'owed' the Gentiles. (Again, this was encoded into the Mosaic Law
as Passover+Pentecost, Jubilee+Trib, mirrors.)
Preface, How God Constructs
Time, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to:
End Notes
Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
o
Technically, Abraham
supermatured in the very year that Noah's 490-year Time Grant, ran
out. That was year 2046 from Adam. Rounded, the number is 54 (2100-2046). [Really, it's 53.5 years. An extra 3.5-year piece is tacked on,
probably precedented from Noah, who entered the Ark 57 days after his
birthday. I'm not yet sure why that is
precedent.]
o
So there is no more time left to Israel, if she doesn't
accept Messiah when He comes On Time. [This might explain the origin of
preterism. If one only looks at the fact
Israel ran out of time, one can falsely conclude that the remainder 'passed on'
to Church. But Bible's promises to
Abraham, Moses, David are UNCONDITIONAL, so are still future. The Last David, inherited them all, Isaiah
53:12. So there is a future for Israel, which Church TIES to, and fronts; ergo, the unpredictable pre-Trib Rapture.]
o
All this was recorded in the meter of Psalm 90; Isaiah 53 picked up the meter
timeline where Moses left off;
Isaiah updated the Advent timeline, since David had been born and died; now everyone knew when Messiah had to be born:
o
1000 years after David's consolidated Kingship, which was (per Bible), 1004 bc.
o
So
then Messiah was SCHEDULED to have the same lifetime as David's total
rulership, 40 years.
o
So
then He would have died in 37AD, had the Jews accepted Him. That was, year 4143 from Adam's Fall. Rule of 57 would be met.
o
So when the First Temple went down, that Schedule
was now in breach. Daniel knew
the meter, and thus metered his own prayer in Daniel 9, timing
the date he prayed it, to the beginning of the last missed sabbatical year,
again shown in his meter.
o
Daniel's metered prayer asked for the specific units
of Time God grants (God
replying also in meter, as well as explicit text), in Daniel
9:24-26. [The '50' is left out,
since it's not Jewish time. So
it's in ellipsis, between Daniel 9:26 and 9:27.]
o
So there were TWO sevens, 14 -- a subunit
depicting Time In Breach, Loss of Time due to Temple Down,
which Moses had warned of, metrically;
which Isaiah metrically doubled (two positives offsetting the negative). As we'll see in the Ephesians passage, Paul
will ape both Moses' and Isaiah's usage, in a type of antiphony showing the Church
will be used as the Time Bridge to fulfill the 14.
o
One seven, was embedded in the 62nd week; and the
other was the Tribulation, in Daniel 9:27.
Both were to play, respectively in and due to Messiah's
'time' (front-and-back
like 7-day-pre-Flood warning to Noah, Messiah's death kicking off the final
57);
since Israel went overbudget, so to speak, in Temple Reconstruction delay (21 years instead of
seven, between 537BC and 516BC).
o
So when Christ came and Israel rejected Him, He ended
up dying seven years earlier, still in the 62nd week of Daniel
9:26. So that 'week', didn't complete.
[We
don't notice that, because we ASSume a lunar accounting. So the preterist thinks that Daniel 9:27 is
the only 7. So too, the
Dispensationalist. Not so!] This hanging extra 7, was yet future at
the time Paul wrote, and would be 'spent' on taking down the Temple under
Titus, 64-70AD. Everyone expected that,
since Daniel 9:26 is on Temple Down.
o Accordingly,
the Christ knew that; so before He died,
He Inaugurated Church To Continue Time for no set AMOUNT of Time,
Matt16:18. John 17:17-23 shows It's Up To Father,
How Many FUTURE SOULS Christ Should 'Fund', On The Cross.
o
As a result, Time is in a 'bubble'
of Daniel 9:26, the '62nd week', a 434, leaving 56 to finish the 490.
o So,
Paul's meter sums 434, to display We Church
Are The Time Bridge of History. [Personal note: I wish my pastor were alive
to see this. All during his ministry he
taught that Church was the Time Bridge, especially when exegeting Ephesians for
us in daily Bible class, for seven whopping years! He didn't know this meter,
or I'm sure he'd have taught it. He
taught it for free. So I'm publishing
this material for free. Anonymously, so
anyone can claim it as their own.]
Preface, Video Playlists
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to:
End Notes
Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
As a result, I've made many videos on
God's Time Rules and on the passages Paul uses, to show their meter. These videos are designed to acquaint the
viewer with the Rules you'll see Paul use in the next section, and to
demonstrate how their meter is designed to show how God met those Rules -- or, conversely,
violated by man. The video series thus
far are unfinished, and are categorized into five playlists:
Psalm
90:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FF2856603C945631 Shows how Psalm 90 is
structured as the Meter of Time, Adam through Millennium.
Isaiah
53 Meter Hypothesis: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=8523934356BE4BDC Journal-type videos on how I learned that no
words were missing in Isaiah 53's Hebrew, and what meter structure I
found. This was how I learned the meter
you're about to see in this document.
10
GGS (Greek
Geek Stuff): http://www.youtube.com/playlist?p=PL5D3F5A2E85CE65CC
Introduction
to Eph1 use of Hebrew meter but Greek words;
this document's contents will eventually be shown in videos, here. This playlist dovetails with Psalm 90
playlist Episode 18 and following. It
includes other NT metered passages, like the Magnificat: click here,
for only
the Magnificat.
10
YMH (Yapping
Most High): http://www.youtube.com/playlist?p=PLB73D9DA02D729857 Jewish dispensationalism compared with God's
1050-year 'house' of Time, primer videos.
Since at least Rambam (Maimonides), Jewish Dispensationalism claims God
Orchestrates Time to run in 2000-year units.
That's close to the Biblical description. (Really 2100 years for the goyim;
2100 years for the Jews; and then Messiah was supposed to Come, which He did.) Since their calendar is off, Jews expect Messiah
to arrive in their Year 6000, but their calendar is 346 years short of
history, and many Jews know that. (Year 2011 they call Year 5771, but it's
really the 6117th year from Adam's Fall.
Sometime during the Hasmonean period, or at least by Josephus' day,
someone took the Seder Olam Rabbah and made it into a historical
calendar, even though everyone knew the makers of the SOB had cut OUT years,
like those under the Persian kings. For
the SOB was designed to keep track of PROMISE TIME, which they didn't reckon as
consecutive time. You can research this
cutting-out, on the internet.)
Genesis
Exegesis:
Genesis
5 begats introduce God's Orchestration-of-Time doctrine. Start in Episode 8c1, where I cover how to
use the GeneYrs.xls timeline (see next page): http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AB5BE9F40D2918FB
.
How
God Constructs Time: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=32D5DBC20BF4163F
General orientational videos on the doctrine,
samples from the above playlists. Of
these, the "Pass the Salt" video pair are the most important. The 'Companion' Pass the Salt has additional
videos in its description, tracing the voting periods from Adam, forward.
Before
the videos, I wrote webpages and documents on God's Rules for Time. I learned the rules first, back in May 2004,
from Daniel 9's text; only by accident (yeah, right), when sleuthing whether
Isaiah 53 had missing words, did I find the meter pattern (2008). So beginning with Isaiah 53 (2008), then
Psalm 90 (2009), then Daniel 9 (2010) and here Ephesians 1 (Christmas 2010),
the current and future videos focus on these Bible passages and meter uses, so you
can see how the Bible conveys this doctrine.
Once you see the meter pattern, you should find it in any
prophetic OT passage you choose.
Other NT passages also use the same meter, like Philippians 3:14 (a Rapture passage), Hebrews 11:1 (a
whole chapter on
Accounting-for-the-Rapture).
So look for the meter pattern in the NT, as
well.
Again,
folks in Paul's day and prior, learned these Time Rules as we learn our
ABC's. This was basic theology, to
them. Daniel, for example, was a
teenager when taken hostage to Babylon.
Daniel 9 is in meter, accounting the TIME of Israel's kings, playing off
specific sections of Psalm 90 and Isaiah 53 via their syllable counts. God's reply to Daniel is also metered; the
explicit numbers in Daniel 9:24-26, mirror Daniel's meter. Thus you know why Daniel didn't ask
questions, though every other converse with Gabriel, ended with Daniel
being surprised.
So
the documents that follow, largely predate the videos. I apologize for the bits-and-pieces nature of
the analysis, but I publish it as I learn it.
It's not fair to delay or keep this information quiet.
Preface, Webpages and
Documents Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to:
End Notes
Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
o
http://www.brainout.net/BibleHebrewMeterCharacs.doc is the latest update
on the Meter Rules. All further refinements of the
Meter Rules will be codified there.
So far, it's a short (16-page),
updated diagnostic of 30 identifiable characteristics in Bible Hebrew
and Greek meter, plus troubleshooting tips.
You can use it to test any passage in Bible for meter. Included in the doc, are hints on how to find
such passages; plus (passim), a tentative shortlist of them.
o
Main
webpage on How God Orchestrates Time: http://www.brainout.net/Mirroring.htm. Has all videos, too.
o
Next,
brainoutFAQ: http://www.brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6. Read it through 6b. Shorter display of the Biblicity of Bible
dates used in Mirroring.htm and GeneYrs.xls.
o
Timeline From Adam forward:
http://www.brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls. Shows how God's Rules for Time affect history
both in Bible and post-Bible. All worksheet dates
are taken from Bible; no astrology, astronomy, or extra-Biblical 'sources'. Just count the dates as Bible gives them, and
be sure to count in SOLAR YEARS. Lunar
accounting is a Jewish convention; but
Bible's calendar is always based on BIRTHDAYS, from Adam forward; so is always
solar; God bid Israel use a solar year,
Exodus 12. So the worksheet Col G (in
yellow) dates tally to Bible. (Our BC/AD dates are
sometimes 3 years off, which timeline also reflects. You can't fix it, by moving the timeline up
three years. There are two self-cancelling
errors in our calendars; that's why SOME of our BC/AD dates are right; some
chronologers only make one or the other, error.
Bible's timeline is self-auditing, so I'll eventually find where those
errors are located.)
o
Backup
Timeline Explanation for
GeneYrs.xls and Mirroring.htm: http://www.brainout.net/TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc. That Word document briefly explains the
scholar errors, i.e., human king's decree in Daniel 9:25; lunar years; ignoring 1Kings
6:1 on David's death age (77), and instead preferring Josephus,
etc. It also goes into the accounting
relationship between 70 and 50 (on page 15 of TenWays), vital to how Paul
crafts and 'nests' his own meter.
o
Another
backup, showing we
can know from BIBLE, exactly when the Lord was born and died, and that
between His Arrest and Crucifixion, there were FOUR DAYS, not one: http://www.brainout.net/PassPlot.htm .
Bible documentation there is
extensive, and will take you months to vet; for God designed Israel's calendar
around the Christ, just as Hebrews 1:2 says, in Greek (mistranslated).
There's really no excuse for our centuries of confusion.
o
Exodus
backup, how the
BIBLE's date (1440 bc) obviously
dovetails with history we know: http://www.brainout.net/Exodate.htm .
o
Another
backup, showing the Noahic Flood timeline;
Bible writers use the LXX, not the BHS dates.
Paul here relies on you knowing the LXX chronology, and tags his meter
to it. So here's that chronology: http://www.brainout.net/FloodChronoREVISED.doc .
The pdf copy: http://www.brainout.net/FloodChronoREVISED.pdf
o
Harold
Camping misused Bible
to craft his Doomsday dates; so, he used the wrong Flood dates, even. If you're
interested, I refuted his calculations here: http://www.brainout.net/CampingTimelineGaffes1.doc
and http://www.brainout.net/CampingTimelineGaffes2.doc
. I
couldn't have done it so well if I didn't know the meter. What attracted people to Camping was his
alleged precision with Bible timelines.
Well, the REAL Bible's precision makes his fake timeline look like the
LXX begats' bungling, in Genesis 5!
o
God's
Play of History Hebrew Meter style
and integration among Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9:4-26 and Eph
1:3-14: http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc ; next, http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.pdf is the pdf conversion.
o Psalm 90
o
http://www.brainout.net/Psalm90ParsedTrilingual.pdf (with LXX and NASB translation as well as
Bibleworks' 5 BHS text)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Psalm90ParsedTrilingual.rtf
o
http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Parsed.pdf (meter map of Psalm 90 with explanation and
notes, parsing and metered translation)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc (original doc used to create the
Ps90Parsed.pdf)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.pdf (map showing the palindromic nature of
Moses' meter)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Psalm90Palindromes.tif (original scan from which pdf was made)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Judges.pdf (map of how Judges tracks to Psalm 90's
meter)
Preface, Webpages and
Documents, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to:
End Notes
Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
o Isaiah 53
o
http://www.brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.pdf (meter parsing map)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Isa53Map.jpg (meter map showing patterns and balancing)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Isa53MeterTransInEnglishWide.doc (metered-to-Hebrew, English translation)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Isa53.RTF
(original sleuthing on whether Isaiah 53 had missing words; has outdated
parsing +LXX)
o Daniel 9
o
http://www.brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf (meter map of Daniel 9 with notes, no
translation provided)
o
http://www.brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF (same, used to create the pdf)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Dan924HebParsed.pdf
(shocking meter in Daniel 9:24-27, no translation; God stresses the 14!)
o
See
also Footnote E of
http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc
. It extensively documents
Daniel's use of meter to track Israel's history and craft the 490 he
REQUESTS from God, syllable by syllable, with cross-references to the
specific Kings and Chronicles passages, Daniel has in mind when he
talks. Will change how you read, Daniel
9. Very shocking and witty. A copy of Footnote E now resides also in
the DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerParsed documents.
o Ephesians 1
o
http://www.brainout.net/Eph1DecreeSyllablesREPARSED.pdf (comprehensive proof of Paul's meter mapping
to Ps90, Isa53, Daniel 9, plus metered translation)
o
http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSED.doc (this
document, used to create the REPARSED.pdf)
Mary's Magnificat
o
In
2012, while making the Synoptic videos
to prove Mark's Gospel is third,
not first: I was nonplussed to find out the Magnificat was metered. Her meter and time tracks, are easily as
sophisticated, as Daniel's. Click here
for videos on her meter. Word doc there
used: http://www.brainout.net/MagnificatMeterDraft2.doc . As
usual, the NT text is pasted from BibleWorks NA27 aka UBS4, unaltered.
o
Last
video in that playlist shows Zecharias' Luke 1 meter; wow, HE plays on Mary's. Bear in mind he spoke 3 months after she did;
Luke's just quoting. So
this tells you how commonly they used meter; like we might compose a lyric or rhyme, on
the fly! Mary's just talking off the top
of her head on ARRIVAL, for crying out loud; Zecharias, is talking for the
first time in nine months! Paul
Uses Their Meters To Craft the Ephesians 1 Ninety-One's: four quarters in the Year, Boat of Church.
Other material (all outdated)
o
Summary
of Bible Hebrew Accounting Meter Usage: http://www.brainout.net/BibleHebrewAccountingMeter.doc
,
o
which
is a Word doc copy of blog entry: http://godsrhetoricalstyles.blogspot.com/2011/06/this-entry-is-long-time-in-coming.html
o
http://www.brainout.net/BibleHebrewMeter.htm
. Initial doc on the
Meter Rules. Has been updated in the
Psalm 90 playlist video description, Episode 23b, and especially in the blog
entry listed at the beginning of this subsection.
o
http://www.brainout.net/Isa53trans.htm
. Analysis of Isaiah 53's import with combined
BHS+LXX texts . Material is somewhat
outdated. My original purpose was to see
if any Hebrew words were missing, i.e., as shown in Moeller's copy of the
Isaiah scroll. What a surprise, to
find the text perfectly metered, instead!
Ephesians 1:3-14
(with Meter-Matching
Translation)
Color Legend:
Red= elision or single-syllable sound; blue (cumulative) and orange (per sevened paragraph) = syllable count;
teal = verse #. Each shaded area is a distinct grammatical unit, divides by 7. Same criteria as in Isaiah 53, Psalm
90's Hebrew.
End
Notes are super- or subscripted in pink. Read bracketed text (but not parentheses) as
part of the meter in translation.
Wavy line is eudokian anaphoric bookend. Dashed line is epainon anaphoric bookend. Thick line
is Temple anaphoric
bookend.
Navigation: click on a boxed verse number to go to its Note. Click on a pink letter to go
to its Note.
Or,
Navigate by these sections: Verse Notes End Notes Meter Notes Outline PaulChrono Verses 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
3 Εὐλογητὸς
ὁ θεὸς καὶ
πατὴρ10 |
Worthy of Glory [is] God the Father a |
|
τοῦ
κυρίου ἡμῶν
Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ 20 |
of The
Lord-and-Our-Master, Jesus Christ; |
|
ὁ
εὐλογήσας
ἡμᾶς 27 |
the One Who Is
Blessing Us b |
|
ἐν
πάσῃ εὐλογίᾳ πνευματικῇ 37 |
with every
spiritual blessing [class] |
|
ἐν
τοῖς
ἐπουρανίοις
ἐν Χριστῷ 47 |
with those living
in heaven, via Christ, |
|
even as He had
elected us; |
56 |
ἐν αὐτῷ πρὸ καταβολῆς κόσμου 66 |
In Him before the
founding of the world, |
|
εἶναι ἡμᾶς ἁγίους73 καὶ ἀμώμους 77 B,D |
we are
[pronounced] to be holy, blemish-free; |
21 |
κατενώπιον αὐτοῦ 84C |
Before Him, by His
Standard; |
7 |
By means of Love,
He had foreordained us, b |
|
|
εἰς υἱοθεσίαν διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ 105 D,I |
into [His]
heirship, sonship through Jesus Christ; |
21 |
εἰς αὐτόν κατὰ τὴν εὐδοκίαν 114 |
Into Him, as per
His Own Delight h |
|
τοῦ θελήματος αὐτοῦ 121 H |
in His Own
Will-and-Purpose, |
|
6 εἰς ἔπαινον δόξης τῆς χάριτος αὐτοῦ 133 E |
resulting in praise
to the Glory of His Grace; |
28 |
ἧς ἐχαρίτωσεν ἡμᾶς 141 |
With which [grace],
He has graced us out: |
|
ἐν τῷ ἠγαπημένῳ 147 F,G,I,J |
within, the Beloved; |
14 |
21+ 7
+ 21+ 28 +14 = 91
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono ChronoChart Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to:
End Notes
Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
7 ἐν ᾧ ἔχομεν τὴν ἀπολύτρωσιν 157 |
In Whom we keep on
having redemption, d |
|
διὰ τοῦ αἵματος αὐτοῦ 165 |
on account of and
through His Blood: |
|
τὴν ἄφεσιν τῶν παραπτωμάτων 175 E,L |
debt cancellation,
for our transgressions; |
28 |
κατὰ τὸ πλοῦτος τῆς χάριτος αὐτοῦ 186 |
per the Standard of
the Riches of His Grace, |
|
8 ἧς ἐπερίσσευσεν εἰς ἡμᾶς 195 |
with which [grace]
He superabounds us, |
|
ἐν πάσῃ σοφίᾳ καὶ φρονήσει 205 |
by means of all
wisdom and reasoned thought; |
|
9 γνωρίσας ἡμῖν τὸ μυστήριον 215 |
|
|
τοῦ θελήματος αὐτοῦ 222 |
about His
Will-and-Purpose, |
|
κατὰ τὴν εὐδοκίαν αὐτοῦ 231 H |
according to His
Own Delight |
56 |
ἣν προέθετο ἐν αὐτῷ 238 F,J |
which [delight] He
(Father) set forth via Him (Christ); |
7 |
28 + 56 + 7 = 91
To Result in the 'Filling-Up of Times' Dispensation; e |
14
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono ChronoChart Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to:
End Notes
Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h k l m n a b c d e f g h i j Verses
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
ἀνακεφαλαιώσασθαι260 |
To Sum, gather under one Head, |
|
τὰ πάντα ἐν τῷ Χριστῷ 267 |
all [Trial] matters, in Christ: |
|
τὰ ἐπὶ τοῖς οὐρανοῖς καὶ 275 |
[all matters] in the heavens, and |
|
τὰ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς ἐν αὐτῷ 283 |
[all matters] on earth, via Him; |
|
11 ἐν ᾧ καὶ ἐκληρώθημεν 291 I |
in Whom, even we inherit, |
|
προορισθέντες κατὰ πρόθεσιν 301 A |
foreordained as per Temple 'Shewbread' Plan;f |
49 |
τοῦ τὰ πάντα ἐνεργοῦντος 308 A |
Through Whom He works out all things,b |
7 |
κατὰ τὴν βουλὴν τοῦ θελήματος αὐτοῦ 320H |
per His Own Standards of Delight, Will-and-Purpose: |
|
12 εἰς τὸ εἶναι ἡμᾶς εἰς ἔπαινον δόξης αὐτοῦ 334 |
to the end that we be [made into] praise for His Glory, |
|
τοὺς προηλπικότας ἐν τῷ Χριστῷ 343 J |
the 1st 'fruits' of those trusting in Christ; |
35 |
49 +
7 + 35 = 91
13 ἐν ᾧ καὶ ὑμεῖς ἀκούσαντες 352 |
In Whom, even you
also hearing |
|
τὸν λόγον τῆς ἀληθείας 360 |
the [Divine] Word
of [Divine] Truth, |
|
τὸ εὐαγγέλιον τῆς σωτηρίας ὑμῶν 372 |
the Official
Announcement of your Salvation; |
|
ἐν ᾧ καὶ πιστεύσαντες 379 |
in Whom, even
believing, |
|
ἐσφραγίσθητε τῷ πνεύματι388 |
you were sealed by
the [Holy] Spirit |
|
τῆς ἐπαγγελίας τῷ ἁγίῳ 398 |
with Heritage
Pledge by that Holy One; K |
|
14 ὅ ἐστιν ἀρραβὼν 404 |
This One (Spirit)
is Downpayment N |
|
τῆς κληρονομίας ἡμῶν 412 |
on this inheritance
of ours, |
|
into Redemption
[price] of [us as] The Possession: d |
|
|
resulting in,
praise for His Glory. |
91 |
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono ChronoChart Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Verse Notes
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
OUTLINE
Verses 6, 12, 14 are anaphoric, dual-entendre: How God Glorifies
Christ and thus is Glorified, using Church.
Verses
3-6, Father Glorified and Glorifies His Son, 21 sevens, Temple
Building D, J
o verse 3 through 1st
clause in verse 4, dramatic opening flourish Prologue (like John begins his Gospel and 1John) -- a 56-syllable doxology and
dateline. See Verse 4 note and End Note a on '56'.
o 1st '91', ten
clauses: second clause in verse 4 through verse 6, Election
Purpose to be sons of the Son.
As a result, Father is Glorified.
[Fulfills Isaiah 53:12 due to contract in
Isaiah 53:10, Matt16:18 and prayer in John 17.
Juridical basis: Election of Christ, so we are elected IN Christ,
Isa52:13, 53:10, 12. j, l]
Verses
7-12, Son Glorified via Church, 28 sevens,
Temple Voting E, J
o
2nd '91', ten clauses: verses 7-9, Spiritual Assets
Election for spiritual growth for building and operation of
Church Temple aka Body of Christ.
o
Verse
10, Trial Purpose to wrap up all history, Time Bridge
back to Israel and Millennium.
o 3rd '91': verses 10b-12, FirstFruits
Presentation Purpose of History. As a
result, Christ is Glorified.
Verses
13-14, Spirit Glorified
and Glorifies Son by Making Church, 13 sevens (number play on 12 tribes with Joseph's
double-portion)
Temple Construction and Function, Royal Family of Christ
o 4th '91', ten
clauses:
verses 13-14, inclusive. Not divisible
by seven until the end. j
o
Verse
13, Sealing Ministry
o Verse 14, He
functions as the Downpayment on our Inheritance, Agent of
Spiritual Growth. As a result,
Spirit is Glorified. [Due to the Election
of Christ, it's justifiable that God Himself make us, since we are the Asset of
Christ. Idea that we are His Inheritance, so it's
not a compromise to Righteousness to intimately relate to us.]
The ten-clause structure of each '91' paragraph is vital: each
clause 'talks back to' its counterpart in the next '91'. Like John in 1John, Paul uses a
tic-tac-toe outline form of
rhetoric. Thus you know exactly
what Paul means.
Greek and Bible
rhetoric frequently stress importance by repeating small differences versus the prior
text. This style is used to
advance the meaning of an idea.
You'll see the Lord and the writers do it with OT quotations, which is
known as 'interpretative quoting'.
Modern example: 'Give me Christ
or give me death'. Obviously I changed
the famous Patrick Henry quote by one word, substituting 'Christ' for the
original 'liberty'.
Paul takes what he'd
just said and slightly changes it to show the relationship
between the prior text and the changed text, so you know exactly what
he means. Since the text is ropingly
repetitive, we Christians miss this rhetorical technique (and especially its
import), which is rampant in Bible (i.e., that's why we have four Gospels, not
just one). The purpose of
repeating and then slightly changing previously known text is to show how the
CHANGE RELATES to that previous text.
It's especially important in legal contracts, and that's what we have
here: Paul outlines the Legal
Inheritance Provision OF Christ, and therefore IN Christ.
[See: I just did a
tic-tac-toe, changing OF to IN, and you thus learned the RELATIONSHIP due to
that little prepositional change. That's
exactly how the NT writers do it, so to see that, track the preposition changes
right here in Eph 1:3-14. Then do that
with any Bible passage. Can't tell you
how often my pastor admonished us to 'track the prepositions' and 'track the
definite articles', in order to know the writer's 'flow' of discourse; else, you don't really know what he's
saying. So, that's what I'm doing here!]
To
see this tic tac toe, print out the three
Greek pages and lay them on a table or floor; side by side, such that each '91'
paragraph is horizontally beside the next, in verse order.
Now,
start with the first clause in the first '91', verse 4's "In Him before the founding of the
world".
Next, read the first clause in the second
'91', verse 7's "In
Whom we keep on having Redemption".
Next, read the first clause in the third
'91', verse 10's "To
Sum, gather under One Head".
Finally, read the first clause in the fourth
'91', verse 13's "In Whom, even
you also hearing".
Verse Notes, Outline, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Do the same for each second clause, then each
third clause, etc. Then do it
vertically, matching the similar words to the next such similar
clause in the next '91'.
In
short, all these clauses link horizontally and vertically, just as building
blocks. Showing the INTERTWINED function
of Trinity. TEMPLE. TEMPLE. TEMPLE. TEMPLE. Tic-Tac-Toe with ALL X's (Christos!),
Full Circle, Ultimate Palindrome.
Awesome stuff!
Two Extra
Observations: First, I get the strong impression
Paul not only invokes Daniel 9's prayer to Restore the Temple as rhetorical
basis for Paul's meter, stressing the 62 'weeks' of Dan 9:1-13's and v.16's
meter, and God's explicit use of 62 in reply, Dan 9:25; but Paul also invokes
Isaiah 63, especially the 'year of redemption' clause in Isa63:4. That chapter is structured as verses 1-9 Son,
10-14 Spirit, 15-19, Father. Isaiah
himself benchmarks keywords in Isaiah 53 and Psalm 90. Daniel
also invokes Isaiah 63:15-19, in Daniel 9:15-19. What a shock.
So maybe Isaiah 63 is metered, too?
Paul definitely invokes it as the legal basis for his structure here,
for look at how Isaiah 63:7-10 act as a biography for the origin of
Church. See also Romans 11.
Second, that Paul
demonstrates by this meter structure, how Church Has Its Own Better Deal
due to Christ's Success at the Cross, ergo his running sotto-voce warning, don't be
jealous of the Jews. By using the same Hebrew Meter as in the OT, Paul
stresses Juridical Continuity,
so we are not to interpret what he says as replacement of
Israel. It's not Juridical Continuity,
if the covenant prior, is broken. And
Paul's showing that in fact the OT covenant is NOT broken, but rather Church is
being used as the Time Bridge To Fulfill The Covenants To Israel,
Eph1:23, Romans 11. [Book of Hebrews is built around Ephesians;
but Paul didn't write it, he'd just died, Hebrews 13:23. Hebrews stresses 'better', Attic kpeittwn;
so we know that God's Promise to Israel is to be fulfilled via Church Time
Bridge: Hebrews 11:39-40 shows that context of Juridical Continuity, from Abel forward.]
OVERVIEW: Verses 3-14 are all one sentence in the
Greek. So you are to read them as a
contractual whole, with subsections. Legal
language: idea that nothing is defined outside the context. That sets up for both Paul's prayer in verses
15-23, which doesn't close, and for the
second chapter's two walls.
[It
now looks like Paul treats 1:15 through 3:19 as a whole, also; meaning, text between 1:23 and 3:15 is a
parenthetical explanation; his actual prayer is bifurcated, so you are to read
the prayer as bookended, with 1:15-23 as the left bookend, and 3:15-19
as the right bookend. Writer of Hebrews
does the same thing but with Jeremiah 31:31-34, left bookend at Hebrews 8:8-12,
and right bookend at Hebrews 10:15-17.
That means he's talking back to this 1:15-3:19 passage in
Ephesians, too. Have to study that idea further, since I don't recall my pastor
(back in 1985-1991) noticing that parallel structure; he noticed and explained the Hebrews
bookending style, but treated the two Ephesians prayers as separate, first
unfinished, latter as finished. It was a
very important hermeneutical point, to him.
Only now, do I see why.]
In short, the
election of Church is separate from all other covenants. You are never to read the covenants prior or
future 'into' the context of verses 3-14, because all other such covenants
are outside the sentence. ELECTION OF CHURCH is the
theme of the book. Doesn't mean
there were no other elections, but does mean that no other
elections (and hence blessing contracts) are in view. In Chapter 2, Paul talks about how Church
relates to the other covenants; Church
is its own wall, and the other covenants are the other wall.
Still, here in
Ephesians 1 Paul deliberately parallels OT covenants, to show precedence and
carryover.
Bride has her own 'deal', but it's based on the past. All Justice is founded on precedence. There must be a contractual reason to
abrogate a covenant and start a new one;
whatever went wrong in the old contract, remains a juridical issue in
the new one. Consistency and precedence
are the foundation of jurisprudence, especially God's.
Christians disregard
God's jurisprudence
(click
here for definition),
when reading Bible. So Ephesians 1 (like
Daniel 9) in translation is churchy, snoozy, gee-whiz-look-how-God-loves-us. So the reader misses what Paul says!
One can see how
Catholics and Reformers, mistakenly or with malice, read Israel OUT of
God's promises. They ignore the separateness
of the legal grammar structure, above. Something
old (precedence), something new (covenant), something borrowed (learning from the past covenants in
the OT), something blue (God's Fealty in all Covenants,
dispensations).
Verse 3 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse
3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14
Bride could have been
Israel, but Vashti refused to come. So Church
(including
any Jews who believe) is The Esther, whose
job is also, to protect the Jews.
All other covenants for Israel were unilateral and unconditional,
sourced in Abraham, Moses, David. So
they are yet-to-be-fulfilled. The only conditional
covenant was the Brideship. We end up
being that Bride. Brideship is a separate
contract, sourced in Christ via his pre-Israel kata-Melchizedek Kingship
(Battlefield
Royalty Award for defeating Satan, Psalm 110, Hebrews 1-2). So it
does NOT negate Israel's own covenants that were unconditional,
delivered also due to Christ as Seed (Galatians 3), but initially provided and thus
precedentally sourced in Abraham, Moses, David. So Ephesians 2 shows TWO walls.
I cover the Two Walls
and the changeover at length in http://www.brainout.net/LordvSatan2.htm#CovProps and http://www.brainout.net/LvS4aContinued.htm#Bridal .
It's vital to account
the covenants and their terms, legacies, and above all, named beneficiaries. If your aunt named you as a beneficiary but
someone else came in and claimed your aunt replaced you with a third party, the
Judge would demand proof, else 'you' remain the beneficiary per your aunt's
will. Same, for God's Will. there
are no other named beneficiaries for the millennial and eternal ot promises
except israel through abraham, moses, DAVID and christ.
But prejudice like
anti-semitism, affords a handy excuse, for Bible misuse. Even, for centuries. Anti-semitism is the
worst spiritual cancer in the Body of Christ.
Sad thing is, all the major denominations have it in their doctrines of
Replacement Theology, preterism, 'we are the lost tribes', amillennialism,
denial-of-Rapture, etc. 90% of
Christianity! No wonder Christians are
hurting. End Commercial Message...
Paul's meter apes
Psalm 90's both in content and structure;
he apes Daniel 9's, in purpose;
all to show God's Use for Time. Psalm 90 began with a Decree Antiphony, first
84 syllables. Isaiah split that Decree into bookends of 42's: first half,
Isa52:13-14; last half, 53:12. (Isaiah 53 starts at
52:13, in Hebrew.) Daniel invokes the 84 in Dan9:14, 17 in 42-syllable bookends
like Isaiah, thus claims the Isaiah promise based on Psalm 90's 84, to invoke the 1Kings
9 contract.
So Paul splits Psalm
90's 84, into four 21's.
[There
are also four 21-syllable 'paragraphs' in Psalm 90, one per epoch: verse 4,
Millennial; verse 8, Adamic; verse 9, Noahic;
verse 16, Israel in Diaspora. See
my Psalm 90 playlist in Youtube; or,
view the same videos at the bottom of http://www.brainout.net/Mirroring.htm
. They comprehensively review how Moses
tracks All Scheduled History in Psalm 90's Hebrew.
Also
see End Note d, j in this document, on the use of 21.]
Paul thus weaves the
Temple-building result of Daniel's prayer into four 91's = one year (364), starting at verse
5, plus a 'Messiah's Vote Precedence' of 70
(56+14); hence Paul's own
verses 3-14 = 434 syllables, just as
o Daniel summed his
meter tally to 434 by Daniel 9:13, and
o
made
Daniel 9:16 = 62 syllables;
so
o God made Daniel 9:25 (also metered) a '62' Promise;
o
so
Paul's verse 3-14 meters sum with the same 62 = 434, to show we are IN the 'time bubble'
of Daniel 9:26c.
Moses
used five 70's
to signify The Schedule Of All History (sabbatically, via believer voting periods). So, he subdivided his meter, thus: 84 (70+14),
70, 70,
70, ending with '56' (70-14, warning Israel would be 14 over her Time Budget).
Hence
Paul parallels Moses' Psalm 90, updates the '70' to '91'; for the Last Adam, won! [See End Note j on '91'.] So Church has its own Time: whatever
it takes, to fulfill the Time Promise God made, in Genesis 3:15.
Paul,
like Moses, then brackets the '14' TWICE to show it will be
fulfilled future of his own writing. [See End Note g, Verse 10 note, Pregnancy 1,
Pregnancy 1b,
Pregnancy 2 and Pregnant14,
below.] This set-apart, bracketing,
bookending, tallies to Psalm 90:16-17 and Isaiah 53:12, respectively. (14 over and then short in Psalm 90, at beginning and end; Isaiah brackets it by DEBITING 28 from the
total, 490 - 28 = 462, the number of syllables in Isaiah 53.) So Paul too asserts both Trib
and Mill, are yet future.
Verse 3
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Paul thus nests his meter, playing on
Chronos, Greek god of time, who ate his kids as soon as they were born. For of course Paul is writing to the Greeks,
so he makes analogy to the Real God, using ideas they all know. As you'll see
in the Pregnant Expectations section, Paul
cleverly nests Hebrew meter with famous Greek epic (10-11 syllable) meter,
again to show the culmination of Time,
via Church. So each
divisible-by-7 paragraph can grammatically stand alone, yet is unfinished. With a grand, recurring enjambment (see End
Note c), the line OF the breakpoint (where
divisible by 7) introduces content of the next 'paragraph'. That's a feature of classical Greek rhetoric,
to begin a new clause based on the content of the one prior. It's also a feature of Bible Hebrew. This is the ultimate palindrome, not
only in meter, but in content. You can
read Ephesians 1:3-14 either forwards or backwards. Full circle.
In
short, Paul's style is dramatic. Those
who allege his style is koine will misread what Paul says (i.e., Ephesians 1:7 and 14 are about ASSETS
of salvation YOU USE, not sterile gee-whiz-I'm-saved-so-I-don't-have-to-name-sins-to-God).
My pastor made a big stink about Paul's Drama Greek style, never mind
whether his words were superficially koine. The meter here proves that decisively, for he
concurrently uses classical epic (10-11 syllables) and Hebrew meter.
The meter is also subdivided into
three 'Glory' sections,
see End
Note n and the Outline. Verse 3 begins the 'Father-Glory'
subsection, how
Father glorifies Christ -- answering His Prayer in John 17 -- Who is glorified
by bringing Church to completion.
Subsection runs through the end of verse 6. The first word in Greek is eulogetos,
and Paul plays on that sound: eulogetos, eulogesas, eulogia. That Trinity soundplay is quite elegant in
Greek, but it sounds chirpy and phony in English; so I translated eulogetos as 'Worthy
of Honor' (my
pastor's translation),
rather than 'Blessed', since 'Blessed', 'Blessing' and 'Blessing' repetition
won't sound elegant in English, but rather hypocritical. Or worse, that God is blessed because He
blesses us, which is contrary to what Paul says!
First Clause: This is
a doxology, dramatic opening to Father. See End Note a. Paul
plays on sound in each clause, as just noted above. It's also better to say 'Worthy of Glory'
given the Trinity epainon anaphora
Paul employs in verses 6, 12 and 14, so the reader sees that
connection in translation. My
pastor's translation was "Worthy of Praise, Honor and Glorification",
so he referenced the anaphora, too.
Second Clause:
Continued. See End Note b.
Third
Clause: More
soundplay.
Fourth Clause: Greek en pasei eulogiai pneumatikei is also soundplay, but its meaning needs much more
explanation. You can't translate its meaning, in English. We snooze and ahh at 'every spiritual
blessing', yet have no clue what that means.
So here's your clue: if you have the Spiritual Blessing, you have all the
material ones, too.
Christ said, Seek Ye First The
Kingdom Of God, in Matt.
6:33; Luke 12:31. First things
first. For, you have a bizillion
dollars; that won't do you a bit of good, if you don't know how to use it. You must learn how to use what you have,
whether a little or a lot, and that's also why the Lord said, Faithful In
Little, Faithful In Much, Luke 16:10, 19:17. So, first you have a little, you learn how to
use it well, and as a result you get more.
So, first you learn a little about your spiritual assets, then use
what you learned, and then you get more.
Now think this over: since your assets are spiritual, you have to
LEARN them. So, that requires what? TIME. Time to study. Time alone.
Time to think. And you know what
that means: you have to have MONEY, so you can have the TIME, to study. For you need money to live, and working costs
you what? Time. If your life is complicated with people and
obligations, well then you need circumstances that somehow save you Time. Get the picture?
Have
you noticed? Every Bible hero spent a lot of time alone. You go off by yourself for set times to
learn, study, think. And yes, you attend
teaching (church is to attend teaching, not socialize). But then you have to think over what you
heard, not just forget it.
Forgetters, James 1:23-25. You
'do' the Word by what? Thinking about
it. Can't do what you don't know,
and can't know, if you don't think it over!
Verse 3
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So you must organize your life, to
get that Time to Study. And you will, if you Want To Learn. Thus you are indeed seeking the Kingdom of
God, since you are seeking to learn it.
Him.
So God will CREATE the Time, the
Money, and whatever means are needed, so you CAN learn. So if
you don't have those things, either a) you're not seeking, or b) you think you
should do it on your own, so you're not Asking God.
ASK
Him. You'll be very surprised at His
Response. More time and money than you can
imagine. But of course, if you want to
spend it on something other than Him, well.. you'll end up losing it. And you will eventually lose it at times,
even when you want to learn Him, to refine your motive in having it.
Training in Having First the
Spiritual Assets, and as a result, the Material. Because you need
the material, logistically speaking, to get the spiritual. Once you have the spiritual, you still
need the material to PRACTICE your spiritual learning assets ON the material. To express your learning. You always have tension between spiritual and material, Romans 8. At times you must stress the material, as
whatever you receive, you own; whatever
you own, owns you.
It's
a funny thing about wealth. A lot of
money can easily be worse than poverty.
Why? Because wealth TAKES UP
TIME. So to get time to study, you must
have the right kind of wealth, in the right amount, lest the
wealth actually Eat the Time you needed for study.
So
that right-kind-and-amount question might result in you seeming to have too
little money, relative to your expectations about what frees up your
time. So ask God how to Find the Time in
the position He gives you. Then
watch what happens. It will always be
glitchy -- remember, the demon boys don't want you to learn Bible -- but
God will always furnish you with the answers if you keep using 1John1:9 and
asking Him, Hebrews 11:6. He will
prosper you more. The right amount, at
the right time, in the right way, to Have The Time To Learn Him. And that's true wealth, baby.
To get a sense of the wealth God
makes OUT of your study, skim http://www.brainout.net/LvS4b.htm#1stFacet
. My pastor spent seven years explaining 'every
spiritual blessing' (in his 1985 Ephesians series); so in that webpage I tried to classify what
he'd taught. Better still, get the
series yourself, at http://www.rbthieme.org . They
never ask for money.
So Paul's Greek en pasei eulogiai pneumatikei, also invokes what people knew from the Mosaic Law, Leviticus 26
and Deut 28. That's
what the Sermon on the Mount, also summarized. God set
up Israel to be the Blessed Nation, so everyone could know HE was God. So people could Vote with their Feet to Learn
This God. That's why He blessed the
weather, the crops, the people with all kinds of genetic talents, looks,
you-name-it: which even today, the Jews are so famous for having, there are
hundreds of jealous myths about them. To advertise that the God of Israel is the Real God.
Of course, going with all that advertised prosperity, was a
sober warning: TEACH THEM. KEEP STUDYING ME. Israel failed to do that. So, look at how she's been punished for
centuries now. Heartbreaking. So for Church, it's the same warning, but at
a higher level. And look how we've been
suffering, too. We aren't seeking Him. So, we hurt.
Katrina mostly hit the Bible belt, you know.
See how
much more is meant by en pasei eulogiai pneumatikei? It's
real, it's literal, it's vast, and it can't be translated except with snoozy
church words everyone knows but no one understands!
Verse 3
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Fifth Clause, Greek epouraniois doesn't mean 'in the heavens', but 'those living in the heavens'. Preposition 'epi'
distinguishes the inhabitants from the place. Greek ouranios, which Paul uses in
verse 10, means the place.
Big
difference. See, a blessing fuzzily
defined as 'in heaven', masks the shocking import of what epouranios means:
Your blessing is NOW,
right down here,
is PUBLIC AMONG those in
heaven, en
epouraniois.
Angelic Trial, baby: that's a Big Deal.
Your dead
gramma or great-uncle knows what you've got in Christ. You don't know. Every elect and fallen angel knows. But you don't know. And they all wonder -- only at times, they
do other things, y'know -- they wonder if you will ever LEARN what you
have.
When my pastor
taught this, he'd often bring up an analogy to a kidnapped Royal heir. The King and Queen spared no expense looking
for him. Finally they found him with the
gypsies in a circus. The kid, of course,
had no idea who he was, he had been kidnapped so young.
A lot rides on whether you do
learn, for none of us is an island. This Angelic Trial is the purpose for Church, too, and that's what
Paul introduces here. If I screw up during a day (and I do, many times)
-- that has an impact forever. Using
1John1:9 can cancel that impact, or at least modify it, depending on God's
Justice Rules. At my stage of
maturation, I expect some discipline remains to train me; I'm not a kid, anymore. I expect some of what happened became a Trial
Issue, so I must redo some practice. (Greek word pragma
often in wordplay for Trial Matter, Paul will elliptically use in verse 10;
which the writer of Hebrews picks up, in Hebrews 11:1.) And
there will be gain, as there was a loss.
That's how God does things, Isaiah 54:1.
UPSHOT: it's all PUBLIC.. up there. Think of Royal Family on TV. That's YOU, on Divine TV.
o Paul's doxology is meant to be instructive: you are a PUBLIC PERSON.
o What you are down here, stopped being an issue
when you got saved. What you are UP
THERE will forever matter.
o So, en pasei eulogiai pneumatikei, Every Spiritual Blessing, is PUBLIC.
o So what do you do with what you have in Christ? That's
the Trial Issue.
o Furthermore, this epouraniois clause
introduces the theme of the Book: Church is Public, Body
of Christ is On Trial, so What
Completes Church, Completes History.
o Trial ends, with Church (verse 10). The rest, is Epilogue.
Are you freaked
out? You should be. If Christ was watched by everyone (and He
was), what do you think is true for us?
We are Body. Why does everyone
obsess over Christianity? Why aren't
they obsessing as much over Buddhism?
More people are Buddhists in the world, than Christian. Why aren't they
obsessing as much over the Hindus? Many
more people on earth are Hindu, than Christian.
Why do the Buddhists obsess over Christianity? Why do the Hindus? Why do the Muslims? And for God's Sake WHY does everyone pick on
the Jews?
You see: we are
PUBLIC, because ours is the Real God.
Everyone knows that. Hates it,
laughs at it, but knows it, just the same.
Verse 3
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
We are much
more public, in heaven. Just as those
Bible people whose lives we often know by heart, our own lives are on
public view, being commented on. So when
you decided whether to wear a pink tie or dress, and had your petty thoughts, it
was all broadcast to heaven. Live,
like the 1999 movie Edtv, starring Matthew McConaughey. When you learned something you found
important about God, that was broadcast, too. When you go to the toilet, make love, eat
dinner.. all public. To the epouranioi,
who decided to peek in on you. Some of
them are elect angels, 1Pet1:12. Some
are fallen, ibid. Some are probably your dead relatives, that's a
logical corollary, for if angels are interested, wouldn't your relatives be,
too? Etc.
Just as those
Bible people's lives are public consumption down here, so our lives are public
consumption.. up there. Think
about it. Smile, You're on Divine
Candid Camera!
[My pastor
taught that angels can't read our thoughts.
I have to disagree with that, partially.
Since we are on Trial, a theme he taught stridently, it's not fair
disclosure if our thoughts can't be read.
So I posit that some kind of Divine Broadcasting System is provided,
either on an ad hoc or on a blanket basis, probably the latter, the idea
being that anyone 'up there' can eavesdrop at will. Why?
To demonstrate the Trial issues.
Most of our lives, are lived in our heads. What we say and do, often is counter to what
we think. It would be an essential Trial
'discovery' (legal term) issue to have our thoughts, disclosed. So, they are.]
Again, my pastor spent seven years showing the ties to
Eph1:3, pan-Bible. Royal Family. Us. Public.
In Him. What we do, determines
history forever. He taught that over and over. 'Not only down
here, where the Justice Consistency Requirement of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy
28 principles obviously apply.. but forever.
"As goes the believer, so goes the client nation to God", my
pastor often quipped. Yeah, and we are
what? A "holy nation",
1Pet2:9. So in whatever nation we live,
we are to be good citizens and thus a blessing to it, 1Tim2, Romans 13. For in heaven, we are forever citizens -- and
the earthly kingdoms, all belong to CHRIST -- Philippians 3:20 (see also Eph
2:6, 19).
So, we are On Display. Just as Christ was. And of
course, still is. He's the REASON WHY we
too are On Display, Hebrews 11:1 (in Greek,
verse is mistranslated, see my http://www.brainout.net/Heb111.htm).
Verse
Notes, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Paul continues the
Father-Glory subsection. First clause ends
the previous 'paragraph', ropes (piggybacks) as is good classical Greek style,
to introduce the next paragraph. The
next paragraph, beginning at the second clause, is about the content of
the Election which Glorifies Father. It
runs through the end of verse 6.
First clause,
double-entendre
syntax: Father elected; but Christ also had to and did, elect Church in
Matt16:18.
Paul uses a 56 dateline for when he
writes: End Of Christ's 56th Year. [See End Note a, Meter Tagging Styles, and Pregnancy
1 on '56'.] That's S.O.P., first divisible-by-7 'paragraph' is a
dateline. It's also 56 sevens from
when Alexander the Great became King of Macedon, who also died at age 33.
That would matter, to Paul's Greek audience.
A Better Alexander is here, and He DID Conquer the World for all
time! [If Paul writes Ephesians during his Acts 21 imprisonment
in Jerusalem, 56 would correspond to our dates; that would explain why the rest of the
chronology here -- see the Chrono Chart link -- so
closely matches our dates. Maybe it was
SENT, later. Tychicus was in both places, with Paul.]
So Paul resets Time
Accounting to Christ's Birth, to show Time is rebirthed, too.
[My
timeline in http://www.brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls,
ties the 490s to Christ's death. Paul
instead benchmarks 490's from His Birth.
So subtract 33 from each of the 490 endings in GeneYrs.xls, see what new
historical patterns, might emerge. God
tracked David's 490s to the endings of his kingship and death, but also
tracked his birth to the 400th anniversary of the Exodus (which you can't see,
until analyzing 1Kings 6:1); so the
490's of Christ would likewise benchmark at death, surely; but what tracks
should benchmark forward from His Birth, I'm not sure yet.
God benchmarks from
births, deaths, crownings, other events;
each is an accounting track; they all converge. So the accounting basis for each time
track must be deciphered, or you'll go in circles, frustrated. Example:
Psalm 90 runs on four accounting tracks:
from Flood, from Israel's slaveship, from Adam, and from the year Moses
writes, to the appointment of human kings.
All those tracks are embedded in the meter.]
See also Galatians
4:4 in Greek, which plays on Christ's Chanukah birthday. (Bible Proof that Christ was born on Chanukah
is covered here: http://www.brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#HisBday
, including timesaving videos.) So Paul just can't help but quip Gal 4:4,
since Chanukah coincided with the Roman Saturnalia: Greek god 'Chronos' is
another name for Saturn, famous for eating his kids as soon as they were
born. Hence Saturnalia at end of year, time eaten, time born. Get the pun?
Christ comes in Full-Term Pregnancy of Time, and is Eaten to Deliver
Time! So Paul wittily uses pleroma
in Eph1:10, see End Note e. [Bible debunkers
ignore the many problems with Varro's 'auc'.
Review Roman
Chronology problems for
details. Claudius
mandated this calendar for Rome. Our bc/ad
system is based on it: 753AUC = '1BC'.
More on this topic is covered in Appendix I, here.]
Anno
Domini
Accounting: Years From The King
(Click
here for the Appendix I bc/ad
reconciliation to Paul)
o Paul follows the same
dateline convention as Isaiah 53, Daniel 9. Time Theme of those OT
passages is first David to Last David.
Last David Has Come And Left The Building For Father To Complete, so
Paul nee Saul (named
after Israel's first king, how apt), writes the conventional date as years-from-the-king, the Last David's Birth. For the brith, changed to Matt16:18's
promise when He Successfully Died, Daniel 9:26's 'karat'. Cutting a covenant. Ours.
o Paul
writes on or near Christ's 57th birthday, setting up his metrical
theme of a 'YEAR' FOR CHURCH (the four 91's). Total syllable count
equals Daniel 9:25's 62 weeks ( = Daniel's meter in
Dan 9:1-13's 434-syllable total and v.16's 62
syllables), subdivided 364+70. Equals years 1st Temple stood (364) versus
its Allotment (490 years, so 126 years remained). Exodus plagues also lasted one year; so too,
Noah's time in the boat. (364: day of exit is excluded. New day piggybacked on sundown prior. Paul uses LXX Flood dating, not BHS, see http://www.brainout.net/FloodChronoREVISED.doc
.)
o Analogy: our 'time' is like Noah's in the Ark =
Christ, awaiting God to say 'come out', Genesis 8:14-16, 1Thess4:17; aka
Rapture, Rev 4:1's 'come up here'. Paul
here tags Psalm 90:3's 'shuvu'
("Return!", a command) as
well,
the 57th syllable in Psalm 90.
[2Pet3:6-8, a Rapture passage, also pegs to
Eph1:4. Notice that Peter ties to the
END of the Flood, not the beginning. Harold Camping misuses it, to artificially
craft an anti-Biblical timeline in order to cover up his own past mistakes,
page 1 of his (nee) rapture-proof.pdf : http://www.familyradio.com/graphical/literature/proof/proof.pdf
. However, Camping's gaffe helps us see
what Peter DID mean. Peter concurrently
points to Psalm 90:4, Eph1:4's bookending 56 meter, with the selfsame ellipsis
in Eph 1:14, tying it to the Flood's LAST 57 in Genesis 8:14-16, which was precedence
in the Mosaic law for the last 57 years of history preceding the Millennium.]
Verse 4
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
o
Precedence: Christ had all
humanity 'in' Him on the Cross, Romans Chapters 5-6; just as Noah had all
humanity 'in' him in the boat.
Paul also
uses the 56
(and
its split-factors, 28) to ape and tag specific passages
of the same syllable counts in
o Psalm 90 (http://www.brainout.net/Psalm90inHebrew.doc),
o Isaiah 53 ( http://www.brainout.net/Isa53Hypo4Dotted3.JPG), and
o Daniel 9 (http://www.brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF)
--
o
as a Warning T0 Vote.
o So the tagging, is a form of antiphony. [See Note a, Pregnancy 1 , and Meter Tagging Styles.]
o
Paul thus ends verse 14 at 434
syllables
= 490-56, as the Entire
Church Age is Dan 9:26's 62nd 'week', yet to finish.
Many scholars know
that separateness-of-Church and 'Daniel 9:26 time-bubble' meaning in
Ephesians 1 and 3; but they don't know how it's stressed and intertwined, within
the meter.
Many of the debates
over Daniel 9's interpretation are conclusively resolved, once you see the
interplay of the meter as a cross-referencing system the writers use to
point to other Bible passages. Daniel's
meter usage in particular, would resolve the hoary debate over when Daniel
wrote; for like other Bible writers, he DATELINES when he writes, by a
specific metric convention (first sevened paragraph). We see that convention from Moses forward; it
can be checked pan-Bible; so it can be independently verified.
Daniel also includes
certain biographical dates with respect to himself, Cyrus and Nebuchadnezzar
that you find in the text; but to also find it in the meter, well.. you
get certification of the traditional early date for Daniel (i.e., 607-538BC), given that meter is regularly used to
Account Time, in the Bible.
Confirmed, by the way PAUL uses the Daniel passage,
as we'll see throughout this document.
[http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc,
footnote E covers the Daniel meter usage line by line. You might want to read it alongside the above
bulleted Daniel 9 link.]
So from this meter,
you can see how Paul sets up his Ephesians 3:18 prayer of 'dimensions' for
Church 'Temple'
(again,
stressing Church has its own covenant), aka
Body of Christ. Thus he also sets
up Chapter 2. It's not clear in
translation how Paul got from verse 1:3 to 3:15; not clear, how he got to Chapter 2. Translation is jerky, out-from-nowhere.
So in translation,
you can't follow Paul's elegant flow; so what he means, you can't elegantly know.
You surely can't tell he apes Daniel, incorporating by reference four
key Bible passages via meter tags!
Ultimate Rule of
Hermeneutics is to apprehend the exact thought of the writer. How many times we've all heard that rule from
our pastors and Bible scholars. Well, if you don't know the writer's flow,
you don't know what he's saying, or why he's saying it! And here we Know The Flow, from the
meter. Because, it was popular to
memorize aurally; so they would value
Paul's evocative syllable accounting.
Meter
was the core of prophetical accounting. For centuries past, God Required You To Know When Messiah would
Come.
See: for eons
everyone was required to know What Time it was.
They learned it while being weaned: 2100 years until the progenitor
for Messiah, then (for Israel) 2100 years more until Messiah came 57
years before The End, then The Day of The Lord. So those distant from each 2100, were
disheartened. Those close to it, were
nervous and goofy, like pre-Tribbers, today.
when was told long in
advance, like the Flood. Paul
demonstrates this accounting, in Acts 13:20ff.
So notice:
post-Temple fall, believers were still
thinking in terms of The Date, which had been long known to be 57 years before
the 4200th year from Adam's Fall. So
they were upset the Rapture didn't arrive, and the public effect was very much
like what you see now with the Harold Camping fiasco. Put yourself in the believers' place: for 2000 years, they were obliged to count count count, warn the world of that
count, too.
Then all of a sudden,
poof! No More Counting?! And what they'd told the world for 2000 years,
suddenly doesn't happen at the right time?
Do you realize now,
why Acts 1:7 reads as it does? They couldn't adjust to the change. So, they kept on counting. Paul relies on that attitude, to show why no more counting is needed.
Verse 4
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Due to Israel rejecting
Christ, a series of potential Rapture dates existed, keeping with the
original pre-Church schedule and its 50-year Harvest-the-Gentiles
goal. These dates were a constant source of speculation, as you'll see in the
Gospels, Acts and the epistles. For
if it was a good idea to have the period last 50 years pre-rejection, and the
same people were living 'now', then it was reasonable to expect God would
'shoot for' the same goal. So went
the 'logic'. For believers didn't
appreciate the changeover, due to Church.
Her existence wasn't simply to make up for Israel's rejection, as Paul
here and the later writer of Hebrews, will explain. A wholly new Body was an award to Christ due to His
Success at the Cross, not based on Israel's contract, but due to 'kata
Melchizedek', the Psalm 110 promise of Battlefield Kingship for defeating
Satan. Souls paid in advance, for
Him.
Old habits die
hard. The writer of Hebrews, like Paul,
will use folks' expectations here to warn them.
[Heb
2, 4, 7, 9, 10.]
Expected
Rapture Dates (Paul's Anno Domini
of Christ's Age; allow 3-year variance *). They calculated
Rapture backwards from an expected Daniel 9:27 midpoint. The underlined links below will take you to
that accounting. Paul uses the anaphora
meter, to 'balance' to these dates.
o
63 AD: Year
66 Trib midpoint, the Lord would have been dead as long as alive; Temple was
thus expected to go down.
o
70 AD: assumes His age 33+40 years at Temple Down in 73 AD. Trib would begin
3.5 years prior. Temple Down's 40
years balance, repaying the Land for Israel's late entry (40 years in
wilderness).
o
77 AD: seven
years prior to the 50-year mark under the old schedule, adjusted for Christ
dying seven years early.
o
80 AD: same
idea as 70AD, but using 33+50, rather than 33+40. Temple assumed to die in 83
AD.
o
83 AD: the
50-year mark, adjusted for Christ dying early (end of year); Temple would die in
87.
o
84 AD: 50-7
had He died on time (beginning
of year, which means April);
o
91 AD: the 50-year mark had He died on time. (Had He turned 40 the
previous Chislev, then died on Nisan, which 'becomes' 91.)
*
Tribulation
timing is based on David dying 3.5 years BEFORE Temple construction
began. So Rapture can only be pre-Trib.
So people then counted backwards from a deemed mid-Trib Temple Down,
to derive Rapture date. Speaking of
dates, Our BC/AD accounting comes from the Roman system. So if Rome were 753 years old when Christ was
born, 1 Anno Domini begins then.
Since Christ is born at the end of the Roman year, you
must add 1 or even 2, due to the overlap.
Also, if Paul wrote just after imprisoned in Jerusalem, 56 fits;
Tychicus could bring the letter later, the postscript
ending Ephesians, written then.
For
more info, see Roman
Chronology problems.
Paul will address
each of these potential dates, in order to show that yes, Virginia the
Rapture can happen at any time; but Body is being built and it will take as
long as it takes. Of course, the real concern should have been
to grow up to know him, and also
(negatively) to Grow Up because you don't know if others are growing up
faster than you, and the balloon will go up when they DO. Classical military motivation, not to be
caught with your pants down at Evaluation.
Bible uses military and economic terms to describe Evaluation, since
that was how Romans rewarded their troops.
Hence the
second clause at 66 syllables, begins a series
of what-if-the-rapture-happened
scenarios. Total paragraph count will be '21' (77-56), pregnant
Precedental Time of Temple Building,
Jacob's Time Outside the Land, Noah's thrice-sent dove. So the kosmou phrase ends equivalent
to our 68-69AD at start, Year of the Four Emperors; when Paul himself will die and so too,
Nero. That's when Tribulation was
expected to begin, but for a different prophetical reason: Christ would have
been dead as long as he had been alive, a 'mirror'. So Paul benchmarks it, as a 'what if'. Notice the wit, playing on the 66th syllable in Psalm
90: Yeah, eleph heleph! We'd have
'shuvu'd' in Him (Who was) before The Foundation, followed by 7
long-predicted years To Complete Building For Eternity! Philippians 3:11's ei pws, written
just after Ephesians, reflects that suddenness. [Greek ei pws ="if by whatever means" (death
or Rapture), missing in English Bibles, say Paul
Attains (works)! Though even BDAG admits katantaw = to arrive at a destination in life, same verb in Eph4:13! The quoted 'shuvu'd' is also from Psalm 90:3,
ending at 63 syllables, leaving seven for the Trib.]
Third
clause,
at 73
syllables
-- another what if the rapture happens scenario -- Paul tags
Daniel 9:5's 73 syllables (confessing all Israel had sinned). Like Isaiah before
him, Daniel used that verse metrically as a second dateline, tying back
to the end of Psalm 90: years-from the
initial rejection of God as King,
in 1050 bc. (=73 sevens = 511, #
years prior to Daniel's writing). For in the Millennium, The Rejected King
Returns. So note how Paul parallels
Daniel: if Trib began at syllable (year) 66, then it would
end at 73; so first Church (@66) and then (@73) the Trib folk would instead
be 'holy', rather than the 'sinners' Daniel rightly
confessed. The Millennium would
begin. Ties also to that same moment in Psalm
90:4, 'ayineyka' in Hebrew (73rd syllable): yeah, in His Sight, at LAST! Of
course, in Isaiah 52:15, 'w'asher lo shamu' ends the 73rd syllable: for
He'd be on earth for all TO hear.
But notice:
73 is not divisible by 7. That would have
been syllable 70, einai hemas, meaning we are to be -- what?
Verse 4
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Next
if-the-Rapture in the same
third clause,
syllable 77. Here
Paul shows what's far more relevant to Rapture:
voting, not
date-setting. Yeah, as voting, not historical events,
cause the Rapture (Paul's climactic chapter 4)! Kinda nice to know Christians this century
are no better or worse than those of Paul's day. Watch...
Syllable 77 is divisible by
seven, so this benchmark is stressed (End Note b). It represents the start of the Christ's 78th year on His 77th birthday as the 77th Son of Adam, same
year as David's age when he died.
Isaiah metered Chapter 53's first 77 syllables after the
first David's age; so Paul apes that, just as Matthew 1 and Luke 3 did, both
books having been out when Paul wrote; so Paul uses the same meter, to
remind his audience. All the more, as Temple was foreknown to go down, 33-40
years after Crucifixion. All eyes were
on that Temple, mouths drooling, We might go Home by His 78th birthday! See: date-setting is not new.
Here
we gotta get technical about how Paul benchmarks the 77th syllable in the third clause
of verse 4, to show his metrical wit and doctrinal savvy, which of course is
for our instruction.
o
Isaiah
metered Chapter 53 based on an accounting theme of First David to
Last David.
o
So,
Isaiah begins Chapter 53 (52:13 in Hebrew) timed to David's lifetime,
o
but
with this twist: first 42 syllables, half of
Psalm 90's 84,
are about the Decree to make the Last David, Christ;
o but the meter is
timed, to the first David's birth in 1040 bc. [So Isaiah 53 should
be metrically read as tracking history from 1040 bc forward. The text
has a dual role of tracking Israel's future Countdown to Messiah 1 syllable = 1 year. Thus we learn how to
better interpret Kings and Chronicles.
Moses had done the same annual tracking, so the book of Judges is
designed in 'reply', showing how Moses'
tracking came true, which I quickly charted in http://www.brainout.net/Judges.pdf.]
o
Those first 42 syllables constitute
the Decree to Make The Christ, and the Decree that He will die for sins at the
hands of his own people, Isa52:13-14.
o
Then
as a result, the goyim will believe in Him, Isaiah 52:15.
o
That's
why Matthew 1 is rhetorically styled to
run at 42's, but
o
Luke
3, uses the 77 syllables
thru Isaiah 52:15, to incorporate the goyim, as the rhetorical base for
his 77th
Son.
o The first David was 77 when he died. [Scholars ignore 1
Kings 1:1-2:39, dismiss 1Kings 6:1 as a scribal error; and favor, errant Josephus.]
o
Paul plays on it as Luke did, but even more
so as Isaiah: 77 as an AGE.
o So Paul meter-maps
the third clause in his own verse 4, to the cumulative total
syllables in Isaiah 52:13-15, the Decree To Create Christ And Have Him
Pay. Notice how keenly Isaiah's
text ties to Paul's, here: einai hemas hagious kai amwmous, result of
Ultimate Sanctification. [So now we know specifically, what Bible
passage God has Paul tag. Meter is like a fingerprint, when you have
enough of it. Paul tags Isaiah's unique
77 palindrome in Chapter 53, just as Daniel, Matthew and Luke had done. ]
o
Notice
next, that Paul instead started the 91, in the second
clause of verse 4, at 66 syllables -- why? Well, look at the text -- In
Him In Him In Him!
o So notice the
palindrome: this third clause in
verse 4, ends with 77 syllables;
o
and
there are also 77 syllables between the
ending paragraph in verse 6 @14,
o
and
the start of the boxed 91 paragraph in the second clause
of verse 4.
o
So
a 77,
inside a 70! So the Savior Who is
the Ultimate
490
(77
aka 70
x 7
aka 490)
Votes even as those who will be saved by
Him voted, and thus He is born! And
Who Voted First? "Worthy of
Honor, God-Father", verse 3! See: the nested, metered wit is
phenomenal! Not like that dry reading in
church! Oh, but it gets even better,
watch...
o David in Him, as well
as He being in David! Us in
Him then, so we can be in Him now, since now He is in us!
o For Isaiah set
Chapter 53 to run 1078 years = syllables (remember, your new
year begins piggybacked on your birthday, so 1078=1077), with the interval
between first David's death and Isaiah's ministry (252 years) in ellipsis between
Isaiah 52:15 and Isaiah 53:1. The second
ellipsis (364
years)
is between Isaiah 53:10 and 53:11, a
promise to reimburse Temple Time;
which promise Daniel claims in his meter (Dan9:1-13's 434-syllable total and
v.16's 62 syllables);
so God benchmarked Daniel 9:25 (also metered), into an explicit 62. You can't see why He uses 62, in
translation.
Verse 4
Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Now
examine Paul's
text at syllable 77: blemishless
(lit., blemish-free animals for
sacrifice). No more lo shameynu, 77th
syllable in Daniel 9 (verse 6). Instead,
hitbonanu, 77th
syllable in Isaiah (52:15). The 78th syllable evor (evening) of
Psalm 90:4 would have begun; 1000 years
dawning on the Day that is night, Zechariah 14:6-7. See how well Paul tags those OT passages?
Original Millennium was scheduled, had
Israel accepted Christ, as the 4200th year from Adam's fall. Moses
shows that schedule, by his own syllable 84 ending Psalm 90:4
(End Note
C). So Paul pegs it, next.
Fourth
Clause and 4th what if the rapture
happens scenario, 84, katenwpion
autou. Before Him by His Standard (kata).
The l'shmua Stands Before all; so we all 'report' Him, Isaiah
53:1 (84th syllable). Daniel's 84th syllable in
Dan9:6 is Ha! For then we FINALLY LISTEN Al-Avadeka the
naviim reported. Ya just gotta love Paul's meter-tags. What wit!
First
Clause
of verse 5: To craft '91', Paul makes 'In
love', an Attic enjambment (End
Note c). Metrically and grammatically, it belongs to
verse 5, but translators rightly end it in verse 4. So it sticks out as a bridge. So the rest of the clause,
would tally '91' (91st year begins on
90th birthday). No Christ, no Plan. the
election is christ, not us. due to christ we are elected. By Means of, by Agency of Love: Christ's.
Not, ours. Paul used the moniker
'Love' for Christ back in 1 Cor 13, climactic passage of His Head to be
completed in Writing so it can get into our heads (1Cor1:5's Greek, His
Word in our words).
Then again, one could
truncate the first clause into seven syllables, like this: en agape, proorisas! For if the Rapture
had happened at 91, we'd all be in the air with a shout, as
Paul told the Thessalonians. That clause
would make a good shout, and you'd elide the second O, to make 7 syllables. Since we'd be shouting, 'hemas' would be left
out. Thus Paul plays a
specific-syllable tagging game on his OWN text, as he talks.
First
Clause
of verse 5, actually ends with 94 syllables, and also is not
divisible by seven. 94 is past the '91' final Rapture date under the old schedule. The enjambment 'piggybacked' the 91, since it's a key
date relative to Christ, is divisible by seven and would be evocative,
here. So the 91 is embedded
in the 94. The 94 doubles as the mid-Trib point, in the
scenario, when the Tribulation evangelists (the 144k of Rev 7), come home to
heaven (shown in Rev 14). They would
be shouting the same thing, at that point.
But they wouldn't be SONS. So
this is a dramatic way to focus on the text -- you are pre-ordained to
SONSHIP, so think about THAT future, not
escape from life. Sound
familiar?
Rapture date expectations end, with 94. Yet Paul keeps using meter this way, to
acquaint us with future Church history.
For this passage, plays the same role as Psalm 90 for the Jews. See Paul's Chronology
Meter, for that story.
Meter
Tagging Styles We've Seen
Eph1:3's
first sevened paragraph ending at 56, is a deft way to 'tag' Isaiah 53:1+2, :5+6,
9+11. Each of those passages sums 56 syllables.
Paul has 'this thing' for quoting many verses at once by concatenated
catchphrase, i.e., in Romans, here in Ephesians, Galatians. I didn't know he'd also do it with meter! Look: Psalm 90:9+10, 13 through 15, 16+17
are also included. Probably
overlapping Psalm 90 verses 7 through 9 (which add to 57), as well.
Eph1:4's second
clause began a new sevened paragraph, 21 syllables long, as
you saw. Paul severally tags
Psalm 90:4, 8, 9, 16; each of those
verses is also 21 syllables. Paul tags these to set up what follows (he'll
also individually tag verse Ps90:7 at end of his own verse
6). So Paul's verse 4 here, second
clause through also the second clause of verse 5 (the huiothesian),
is antiphonal to those Psalm verses.
Compare content, see for yourself.
Awesome wit!
So right away we see
these Tagging
Styles:
o
First sevened paragraph is a DATELINE. Here, Anno Domini, the
year-from-The-King, in which Paul wrote.
o
By individual syllable number, above examples of
66, 73, 77; and finally 84, on Daniel 9:6. Of course, Daniel repeatedly tags individual
syllables in Isaiah, to create his prayer.
So we know Paul knew Daniel did that, for he aped
Daniel.
o
By aggregate (cumulative) syllable number,
example of the 84 and 77, above. Isaiah tagged Psalm 90:4; so Paul tags
Isaiah, as well as Psalm 90.
Which means, Paul knew Isaiah tagged Psalm 90.
o
By a sevened paragraph's sum, just illustrated
above with 56
and 21. More on the 56 and 21, is in Pregnancy 1.
o
For
more information now, see first section in Meter Notes,
and Paul's
Chronology Use of Meter.
Thus
we see Paul deploy meter based on Moses: in Bible, for 1500 years. It can be tested. It is deliberate. So what a
revolution for hermeneutics, if we all sought metered passages, i.e., those
giving us trouble. Even a old brainout
or a young kid, can count syllables; but
full research requires a cast of thousands,
not just one. Think of the
JOBS! End Commercial Message.
Verse Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
First
clause: Greek en
agapei syntactically belongs to verse 5, heads the verse.
However, it's not wrong for translators to have put it at the end of verse 4,
see End Note c. Paul is piggybacking the import
of verse 5 on Love (aka Christ, aka Love=God).
Greek preposition en is a keyword, especially pan-NT.
Idea of stressing causality and result by nuanced use of prepositions,
articles, etc. Turns these little workhorses into racing stallions, driving the
meaning of every verse. That is, if you
can trace them. Hence, one might argue en should
always be translated the same way, since in Bible you track keywords, to see
flow. [Ergo many
scholars prefer literal-translation Bibles like KJV or NASB, to make tracking
easier.]
Unfortunately, English semantic range of 'in', though now heavily
influenced by Biblical usage, is too narrow, vs. Greek en. So in this passage, where the MEANS function
of 'en' is stressed, I translate it with by,
by means of, agency of, with hopefully enough repetition for the
reader to track those nuances. For Paul
repeats the same word, to exploit semantic range. That's a mainstay rhetorical style
pan-Bible.
Greek verb proorizw
is better and more literally translated, fore-order. Plan.
That's Paul's point, too. A Plan
is what you WILL and what you PROVIDE, with no connotation of forcing. 'Order' or 'ordination' connotes approval of
that Plan. There is no implication of
forcing. In fact, quite the opposite: any
plan has contingencies for events that don't conform to the plan. Hence contingencies that violate the plan are
not only assumed to occur, but have backup plans associated with them. That's the idea here. One might prefer 'predetermine' as the
translation. But even that doesn't have
the breadth of 'foreordain' in English, which we all know means a predicted
outcome that is approved and provided for, not something
imposed upon the recipient.
Think of it
as insurance. You buy an
insurance policy which (pretend) simultaneously insures that if you die, your
heirs get money; if you are disabled,
you'll be well taken care of for life;
if you need a loan, you can automatically get it; if you need certain expenses paid, you'll get
that money for those expenses. Pretty
neat policy, huh.
Now notice
something: the policy just sits
there. It doesn't force those things
to happen to you, but provides funds
for those contingencies. And, it's approved in advance, so you know
you can trust it, the issuer has already calculated the costs, Put Them On
Deposit.
That's what proorizw
means. All the costs associated with a
given plan, including all contingencies which the Grantor will act on; and most importantly, proorizw means
these contingencies and their costs are Paid In Advance, and On Deposit, for
the contingency of usage. None of that provision,
forces those contingencies to occur.
You have
such an insurance policy, aka Salvation. Christ paid it all in advance, and the payment
itself was a planned thing in eternity past.
The hitch was, would He Freely Succeed, once Here and on the Cross? Else, there would be no funds. But He did, and you have this policy PAID BY
HIM. Not, forcing you to use it. Not, forcing Him to use it. He contracted to do it, however any contract
can be broken. Yet "in Love",
"by agency of Love", He will honor that contract. See the difference?
English
'predestine' connotes a forcing that is not in the Greek. Sadly,
theology prefers the harsher 'predestine' with all its English undertones of
no-free-will, fate, Hindu karma, etc.
I think 'predestine' shouldn't be used, given the theological shackles
with which it has been bound.
Verse 5 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Second
clause: Greek huiothesia gets scant attention, in
theology. We but mouth it. Paul uses a culturally-loaded word,
here. Rights of Firstborn Son. Inheritance rights. In Roman custom, there was but ONE heir;
everyone else got specific bequests out from the testator's estate. Often, the heir had the right to overturn
those bequests. So all who were
junior, were beholding to the Heir for their inheritance, as well as to the
Testator.
Point: WE SHARE IN ALL CHRIST IS AND HAS. My pastor stressed that, when
exegeting this verse.
Point: if we Christians
only grasped how VAST is our inheritance, we'd study Bible deeply.
You inherited a bizillion dollars, in
Christ. Do you know how to access your
vast wealth in Him? Do you realize, Prayer means you can Ask Anything In His Name and He will do it,
Jn. 14:13f; 15:16; 16:23f? So now the
flipside: if you do not ask, then you are responsible for fallow wealth. Stingy servant with the napkin (Luke 19:20), you will be punished for not
using 1 John 1:9 (an asset, Eph 1:7, 14), for not growing in Grace (2Pet 3:18), for not learning and living on Bible.
For the Heir DID do those things, Luke 2:40, Matthew 4:4, Deut 8:3!
Just start thinking of yourself as the
richest person in history. For, that's
what you are. In Christ. Once you recognize this and take
it seriously, you'll get serious about Bible.
For it tells you what you have, and how to use it; and baby,
you're in deep doo-doo if you don't use your wealth. End Commercial Message.
Third clause: Greek eudokia is often translated good pleasure. Paul
dramatically parallels it with the two bouletai uses in Isaiah
53:10's LXX, which is usually translated 'delight' or 'please'. 'Delight' is better, so I used it.
Thus begins the first of three subsevened
anaphora, Drama Greek rhetorical bookends: this one,
'contains' the Wealth Father put into Christ on our behalf. Wealth is
classy. So you need [Bible!] classes, to
learn how to use it. So click here, for the eudokia anaphora. See also Note h, and the intertwined chronology, in Appendix
1.
Fourth
clause: Greek thelematos isn't merely Will, but Purpose.
Every time you will something, there's a reason (good or bad, right or wrong) behind your
will. For every will is a decision based
on Something You Will. Get that
order.
o
You have
content.
o
You decide ON that
content.
o
At no point is the
content, deciding on you.
o
So you are
responsible for whatever you decide, and
o
you are never
constrained by the content.
o
Much more so, God.
o
His Purpose is
first an Act of Will, Decided upon.
o
So you can never
divorce purpose from will, nor will from purpose;
o
but you can always
divorce both from Content,
o
since Will
determines how Content will be valued.
So God's Purpose and Decision isn't forced on
Him by a) what He knows, or b) what He is. HE CHOOSES FREELY, at all times. All that, is inside the meaning
of thelematos. And it should give
you a great deal of comfort:
o
God isn't choosing
you because of you (that's content),
o
nor will He reject
because of you (more content),
o
nor did He devise
this Plan because of you (more content),
o
nor does He remain
faithful because He must (content of Attributes).
o It's all 100% God and 100% Voluntary At All Times. [See:
God truly is Sovereign, Theos Thelematos. Over His Attributes,
not 'constrained' by them. That childish Calvinist notion of
'constrained' needs to go to the dungheap, in the 21st century.]
Verse Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter
Notes Outline Pregnant
Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Verse 6
First Asset in the eudokian portfolio,
eis
epainon.. doxzes autou.
Father Glorifies
Christ
by ordaining us BE
Christ's Glory..
Here we also meet a second nested anaphora Paul uses: the epainon.
It is nested partly inside the eudokian anaphora. So the first Asset in the eudokian
asset portfolio, is the greatest. By Divine Decree, We will be THE Glory of
Christ Himself. It's
shocking, until you respect the fact that God
shouldn't settle for lesser-thans. So, He doesn't. So, we won't BE lesser-than Christ. By Divine Decree! Bride should be worthy of Her Husband. God can do anything. So, He does EVERYTHING.
God is Infinite.
So, we must be also: "be ye
Perfect", Christ said. You don't spend time on trailer trash, so God
will not. But we are trailer
trash, compared to Him. So, He did
something about it. Salvation is only the beginning.
This first asset tells you the past-hidden plan from the getgo: ye are Gods, John 10:34-36. The Son
of God is the CopyBook, and we WILL BE made copies of Him. By Divine Decree.
Not equally, for we don't equally choose to use our eudokian
portfolio. But, in
aggregate, as a fitted hierarchy, each to his own self-selected pattern, will
be THE Glory of Christ. Some of us (very very few, maybe 1000 in all history) will be
kings. The rest, will forever be Royal
Peasants who didn't learn to live on Word as Christ did, but learned other
things (works, rituals, people). So, they don't have the Thinking
Needed To Rule. So, they will be ruled.
But even the lowest among us will be light-years superior to all the
human achievements and satanic achievements in history, combined. What's lauded down here is despised even by demons, up
there.
And rightfully so, for our ideas of spirituality are
despicable. God expelled
the Jews for far less rebellion, than ours.
Daniel 9's confession of Israel's history of rejecting God, is doubly
true, for us. We have so much more than
she had, as you will soon see. Assets
we ignore or twist, to make ourselves important to ourselves.
Christians down here pride themselves on their faith. Meaning, of course, that God doesn't
deserve it. You realize, I hope,
that when people pride themselves on what they do, it means they hate that very
activity, and seek pride as a solace. So when people make a big stink about
THEIR faith, denomination, practices -- they advertise that they hate
those very things. They advertise, to
get compensation. Because, they feel
they aren't getting any.. from God.
When you love someone or something, in your mind nothing you ever do is
good enough. So you never crow about
it. If you managed to do something well,
you are grateful, not resentful. You
don't expect anyone's approval, for you never have your own. You constantly strive to improve, because you
LOVE what you're trying to achieve so much, all you want to do is.. more of the
same. You'd do it for free, you'd even
prostitute yourself if need be, to do it.
Love is like that.
Hatred, by contrast, always feels it gives more than it gets. So is constantly seeking recognition,
approval, and magnifies little goods as if they were monumentally
valuable. Because, to hatred, everything
self does is too much for what it gets in return. Not receiving the return it deems
appropriate, it goes to pride, comforting the self on what sacrifices were made
for no gain. Even a cup of water in
Jesus' name is given high status. And,
that's as high as Hatred is willing to go.
Such is the history of Christianity.
So for God to want to make
us into His Son's Glory is warranted, for HE deserves it -- but the very idea is unfathomable, just the
same.
Verse 6 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
o Meanwhile, we preen over how humble we are to insist how low we are. How arrogant! It's a cop-out, really. An excuse to be a peasant.
o So, these majority-rules peasants of
Irrevocable Eternal Royal Birthright, gauge their worth by how well the
puny world lauds them,
o their degrees or peer recognition,
o hushed tones and 'oh brother',
o how many they 'converted';
o and they call their activities all sorts of sickeningly arrogant names,
like 'soul winning'. Oh? YOU win souls for God? Should he bow and scrape in gratitude to you? Yecch.
o They pride themselves on how nice they are to people, but James condemned
it. Christ condemned it even more.
o Christians down here pride themselves on whether they can spout Bible,
o give to charity,
o and they make sure to pat themselves on the back for every little good
deed they do.. while the angels, vomit to watch. Jesus I know, and Paul I know, but who the
HELL are you! the demon literally said to the seven self-righteous sons of
Sceva, Acts 19:15. [My pastor was particularly fond of reciting that verse. Made the prim folk in the congregation,
wince.]
o Christians pride themselves on their doctrinal fights, with those most
heretical, calling everyone else Heretic!
o Christians take to politics, when Christ warned against that, and Revelation
17 made it clear that Church in politics is a harlot.
o Christians account themselves spiritual if they sing rah-rah Jesus
songs -- because oh, there are a dozen
verses out of TEN THOUSAND ON LEARNING TO THINK BIBLE -- well, those dozen
sing verses must be the spiritual life!
o So they gauge spirituality by how they feel,
o and they think they are spiritual giants if they can recite Psalm 23.
o They pass judgment on those whose (usually sexual) sins differ, in order
to feel superior.
o They argue about Saturday or Sunday, wearing hats or dancing, is it
Yeshua or Jehovah or Yahweh;
o and, like Tom Lehrer sang.. everybody hates the Jews.
In short, it's a sandbox, Christianity.
All chirpy all mistaking morality as spirituality (lol even the Muslims
are largely moral); and in short, FLUNK is their report card. Assets
Fallow.
But even so, when the balloon goes up, they will be to however small a
diamond-faceted extent -- a true Glory of Christ. Maybe one-quarter carat of the Karat Who was
Garroted to the Cross, but still genuinely reflecting Him. Even Him.
Father would have it so; and so it shall ever be.
So the values you have now, will
reverse. Up there, ONLY CHRIST will be
interesting to you. By your free
will choice. Okay, but what will you
have to give to Him? To express your
love? Nuthin', if you didn't use these
assets. Someone else will have them, and
you'll be under that someone else, mighty grateful and happy, but.. with
nothing but a smile. That's why Christ
said, get rich in Doctrine, 'and all these things [material needs] will be
added to you. Yeah, forever. Literal material wealth: for the ruled need
it. For, all they ever learned down here
were body ideas, slapping God's name on everything they wanted, to feel holy.
So they never learned the spiritual life.. which is To Think
Royally.
So this topmost benefit, Made Into the Very
GLORY OF CHRIST -- will be your heart's desire. With no
matching physical assets, if you didn't learn and live on Bible. As usual, when God makes great
promises, there's a horrific flipside: you'll
wish you went after Bible with all your life, once you're dead. But it will be too late. No punishment, but
nothing atop your naked salvation, either.
And you'll be happy. But low. Bet you don't want that future...
Verse 6 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So now, to these Assets. The epainon anaphora being nested
within with the eudokian anaphora, tells you juridical origin. In short, due to the eudokian anaphora, the epainon
anaphora occurs. As shown in verse 5's note, eudokia references the WILL. Moreover, Paul makes sure you know eudokia
relates to the Isaiah 53:10 contract between Father and Son, via the cognate boulen
in Eph1:11, thus tying to bouletai (twice) in Isaiah 53:10's LXX.
Greek epainon needs clarification. Technically it's the sum of epi+ainos;
on the surface, it means 'good report' about someone. The 'someone' is put in the genitive
case. But 'good report' doesn't convey
the meaning, here. When you ARE a praise, it means you REFLECT
the object, yourself. [See Thayer's
lexicon for epainon, which notes for Ephesians 1:12 that we ARE the
praise. That distinction is very
important to the shocking meaning of this anaphora.]
So someone looking at you, admires the object you represent; for you resemble that object. Thus, the person looking at you, is
doing the praising. Not, you doing
it. All you do, is breathe. Example:
when people in the OT saw an angel, they would often mistake the angel for God,
and would fall flat on their faces, etc. The angel didn't do any praising
of God, the angel gave a message. But
the very glory of the angel made the one seeing him, think of God. That's the meaning of epainon,
here. We
will so totally reflect Christ's very Glory, we will seem to BE Him. Way higher than, angels (theme of Hebrews 1-2, 1John 3:2).
Unlike the eudokian anaphora, which is
dramatically complex, This epainon anaphora is spectacularly simple. Here's how it works.
If you said 'Give me Christ or give me death', you replaced 'liberty'
with Christ; you would make someone
smile, if they knew the original Patrick Henry quote. Paul makes this same 'substitution', to
convey astonishing Bible truth. The exchange denotes how the replaced
words are fulfilled. Look:
As we saw in the Outline, the epainon
anaphora is about how God the Father
Glorifies Christ, how He ordains Church to Glorify Christ, and how the Holy
Spirit Glorifies Christ. As a result, Father and Spirit are
glorified. Really shocking. What makes it shocking is the way Paul
makes small changes in the Greek words. These changes make deft points
about HOW Christ is glorified. The
structure is a dramatic tic tac toe. In
Greek drama you drop verbs, and instead use nouns and participles, as Paul
now does, here:
Verse 6:
eis
epainon doxzes tes charitos autou.
Verse 12:
eis to einai hemas eis epainon doxzes autou.
Verse 14:
eis
epainon tes doxzes autou.
The bolded text tells you a story: how Isaiah 53:12, gets
done. Keywords epainon
and doxzes are used in Isaiah 53:1-2.
Idea that His Glory wasn't appreciated while He was here, and the 'good
report' of the prophets and believers, was likewise rejected.
So, verse 6,
the Glory of His Grace will be used
verse 12, to create us AS His Glory, which Reflects Him. Hence, a good report of Him.
So, verse 14, we are made by the Holy Spirit into THE Glory of
Him.
(In English, to get the force of 'tes' in verse 14, you should put THE all
in caps and make it really big.)
Second
Clause: Sometimes repeating words in Greek is elegant, so Paul uses both charitos
and charitow, together. So the
only English equivalent was 'graced us out', which in English is less formal,
but more vivid. Paul's vivid, here.
Third
Clause: "In the Beloved". Greek en
= by means of by agency of with, and Paul means them, too: all prepositions, Him. He uses prepositions as bullet points,
meter divisions. Genitive's root idea
is belonging-to. So Him to us, we to
Him.
Verse
Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Paul meter-maps Isaiah 53:9, here.
He also tags the other 28's (see Note E and Pregnancy 1b
for the verses) in
concert. So we know exactly what he
means, in Ephesians 1:7. No guesswork.
Every one of those 28-syllable paragraphs in Psalm 90 and
Isaiah 53, are on your sin and His Redeeming You. So what does that redeeming,
mean? Well, per those metered
paragraphs, ya got two kinds of dying.
One, you die angry at God, so God mirrors your own anger back at you, so
you come to know the 'anger' of God; two, you die wise and happy, knowing
you'll see Him in a few minutes. Not
afraid. Not angry. For, you know He redeemed you.
Second Asset of your
eudokian portfolio,
REDEMPTION: ten apolutrwsin.
'Redemption' is the substitution of one item for
another.
Christ
substituted His Own Life for ours.
Have you ever seen a coupon? You can either get whatever's pictured on
the coupon, or you can "redeem" it for a certain (usually small) amount
of cash. Just look on any coupon's fine
print. In America of the 1950's, it was
a craze for grocery and hardware stores to give you 'Green Stamps'. They looked just like postage stamps, and
you'd get 10 or so every time you shopped.
Then you pasted them into books; and when you got enough books full of
the things, you could REDEEM them for items in the S&H catalog. Took like a bizillion stamps to get a
'free' kitchen knife, but it was fun.
Everyone likes getting something for free. Except that it wasn't really
free. It cost the retailers hundreds of
thousands of dollars, and it took a lot of TIME to paste those stamps into
books. So you ended up paying for the
stamps via grocery (etc.) prices, for where do THEY get the money to pay for
the stamps they give away, except from sales?
And then you paid double, with the time spent pasting...
Salvation redemption is just the
opposite. You DO nothing. Christ DID everything, Romans 5:8, Gal
3:18-22. So Salvation Redemption means you
have a LIFETIME COUPON -- and your life never ends -- a LIFETIME COUPON of
money. He paid it, you have it. Like, a bank account. Now of course if you never find
out the account number, then all that wealth just keeps on being on deposit in
the Universal Bank of Heaven, doing you no good at all.. until you DIE to this
world, and go home to His.
So then, how do you access your
wealth in Him, exchanging (redeeming!) your puny ideas of life, for His? Ahhh. You realize, right, that the quality of your
life depends on the quality of your thinking?
Bad thinking makes people sick, poor, get into trouble. So if you had competent thinking, the quality
of your life would improve. Better job,
better decisions, better everything.
Whether rich or poor. Whether
sick or well. Your life is only as good
as your thoughts are. Petty thinking,
jealous thinking, nasty thinking makes for an unhappy life. Wealth of any kind gets spent mostly on
trying to fix problems, and inevitably one finds out that the intended fixes,
were just loose band-aids or another buggy computer program. Very upsetting.
Bible alone can cure it all, and truly make you happy, no matter what
your circumstances. That's True Wealth,
and why people even seek wealth. But
only Bible can cure the SOUL. But you
first gotta BELIEVE that you have the wealth.
Then you gotta BELIEVE it's important to find out what it is. Then you gotta Study Your Divine Assets
Manual, so your LIFETIME
COUPON doesn't DAM up and you say, 'Damn! What good is this Bible?' But you open up that Bible, and it's all
words words more fuzzy words. So let's
first cover Accessing your Divine Asset Management Account (ADAMA), so Bible
won't stay a DAM gathering earth-dust while it sits on your coffee table -- so
people will think you read it, of course -- because you rightly have
trouble giving a damn about its fuzzy
words, the many denominational fights, etc. ad nauseam.
Verse 7 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Redemption means You CAN name your sins to
God. Just NAME them. You got ticked off in
traffic. "Dad, I sinned!" You got ticked off at Windows. "Dad, I sinned!" You worried about some bill. "Dad I sinned!" You felt guilty. "Dad, I sinned!" It becomes as quick and natural as breathing,
to REALIZE that 1000 times a day you have some thought which God would never
have, so it's a sin. Anything you do
with your body, of itself isn't the sin: sin is what you THINK. Body just obeys THOUGHT.
So it's a big deal, to Just Name It And Move On, not even stopping to
feel bad about it, for -- guilt is a sin, too! Feeling bad doesn't ATONE for squat. So you just committed the sin of
HALLUCINATING that how you feel, accomplished something. NAME IT,
move on! You got this LIFETIME COUPON, see: it never expires. So naming
sin means Dad writes a check to FIX YOU, from what Son paid on your behalf 2000
years ago! Imagine what INTEREST
accrues on His Payment, 1900+ years before your birth!
Our use of Redemption is far simpler than
what the OT people got; they also had to
o go to the hassle and expense of finding blemishless animals,
o dragging them to the local Levite priest,
o putting their hands on the animal,
o Naming The Sin
o while the priest cut the animal's throat.
o Then blood,
o more waiting,
o the smell,
o and you took some of it home
o or ate it there in front of the priest,
(often, not always, depended on what kind of sin it
was).
o And you did all that, because it was DINNER. With God.
Restored to Peace with God, signified by eating
the animal that just died 'for' you, picture of Messiah-to-Come.
If you're at all familiar with eating in the ancient world, you have to
know that meat was hard to come by.
People lived on milk, fish, cheese, grains, vegetables. Very small amounts, too. But here you are, every time you sin, EATING
THE BEST MEAT. And you just know, people
sinned 100 times a day or more. Life was
even more annoying for them, than for us.
Still, it was a hassle. Took at
least an hour, not to mention, waiting in line behind all the other sinners
with their stinking lambs, goats, doves, and the doo-doo those animals would
excrete.
So contrast this: Redemption for Church
means that since Christ is the Lamb of God and He paid, there are no more
animals to bring, and you are your own priest, 1Pet2:5,
9; 2Peter 1:9 (in Greek, translators forgot to translate labwn, lol); Hebrews 10. Takes a nanosecond to think toward Father and
admit you sinned, even if you forgot what ones and when, you know you did, so
you admit it. I use 1John1:9 a bizillion
times a day.
Of course, many Christians think it's too hard, hallucinate that they
have to keep TRACK of their sins, and they feel bad about doing that, so they
invent excuses. Like the hallucinated
idea that here in Ephesians 1:7, you're forgiven of all your sins so you
don't need to tell God you sinned, anymore. Okay, then you're drawing funds from your own account down here, for the Holy
Spirit won't fill a defiled Temple. You.
For your online banking with UBH requires 1John1:9 as the passcode. No tickee, no washee. So you're not clean. So you're not filled with the Spirit. So you're INCOMPETENT at reading Bible. So you are DAMNED up, and you'll be punished
for it, Colossians 3:25.
[Nerd Note: There's a crazy
'school' of 'scholars' who maintain that Greek aphesin (next clause) is
appositional to apolutrwsin, here.
They clearly aren't using 1John1:9, so that's why they are utterly incompetent. For just as in the OT prospectively, for us
retrospectively, Christ's Payment means you CAN name sins, but you still MUST do it, to be back in fellowship with
God. David
explained that, in Psalm 32:5 and 66:18, which is reasonably clear in translation. I did a whole playlist of 1John1:9 videos
showing the many categories of OT verses.
So naming sins is based ON Redemption, and is a function OF it. Here in Eph 1:7, you have an Attic double accusative of cause and result,
not koine appositional usage: my pastor stressed that 1000 times. Paul's language is Greek drama, with DROPPED
VERBS. Very obvious. And all the OT confirms that meaning. Moreover, anyone sane can read 1John1:9 and
know that, since JOHN confessed the same thing (we we we
we we we -- hello?), putting The Funding BASIS in 1John1:7.]
Verse 7 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Idea? Redemption means Forgiveness In Time is FUNDED -- a) so you CAN name your sins, b) so
you can GROW UP spiritually, not merely be saved as a newborn.
OT saved like David, Moses, etc. all sinned. We have their sins recorded. David even wrote about how if he did NOT name
his sin, God made him SICK, Psalm 32:5, 66:18!
We just don't need the animal ritual anymore, for the Lamb of God,
Paid. Hebrews 6-10 also warns that NOT
admitting sin -- results in destruction (subtheme since
Hebrews 2:1).
You neglect your salvation assets (Heb 2:1), if you don't use 1 John 1:9.
John used it, "we" in 1John1.
Like, David, Moses -- for which Moses wasn't allowed to enter the Land,
Deut 32. So we don't enter our
inheritance, if we won't name our sins to God.
Babies we are, and babies we stay.
Saved but naked, 1Cor3. The
adults (atsumim, in Hebrew Isa53:12) get the inheritance instead, to
spend on the babies. The babies, have
nothing. Forever.
No one learns Bible in a state of sin. A state of sin exists even after the sin is
committed, UNTIL YOU NAME IT to God. And if you don't remember, just say I
SINNED, DAD! You needn't be anal, keeping sin lists, agonize here!
Christianity remains in the theological playpen for 2000 years,
for Christians won't use 1John1:9.
Can't properly read Bible, without it.
So, they don't. So, they lose
their faith. So, they get punished.
So now let's talk about what it means, to GROW UP, 2Peter
3:18. Well, if you use 1John1:9 regularly, what's
redeemed? Your thinking. Sin isn't your biggest problem,
but its aftermath. Sin is an addiction. As with any other addiction, you CAN say
'no'; but your desire increased with
prior repetition. So it's harder to say
no. Sin is inherently a desire to fit in with the world. Individual sins
themselves are all rooted in that urge. fitting-in. Moral
sins, or immoral sins, all try to FIT IN.
Your body thrives on repetition, familiarity. It can't tell the difference between
repeating something good, or something bad.
To it, repetition of any kind is good.
Repetition breeds comfort, fluency, competence and skill. So if you repeated a bad thing, its
attractiveness grows; a built-in urge to
do it again, repeats upon the next instance of associated past
repetition.
Each successive repetition, makes the next one, easier; more fun;
more automatic. And so it is with
sin, too. So it is with learning and
living on Bible, too. But you can't learn Bible in a state of sin.
So: naming sins, is important. You
can't access this Divine Redemption Thinking from Bible, except while
you're filled with the Spirit; and He won't
fill, a defiled Temple.
That access is phenomenal: 'Filling', means Filling you with Divine
Perspicacity. My pastor called it
"Spiritual IQ", and he's right.
I'm evidence of it. God makes you
smarter as a result of 1John1:9. See, this is a real asset you can use. And you need it, because you need Divine
Smarts, to grasp Bible. So, you can
sometimes grasp in minutes, what takes a scholar, a year or more to
research. Why? Because the Holy Spirit Connects the Dots,
John 14:26. Even a great scholar who's
not using 1John1:9, is trying to connect them on his own power. So, usually he runs around in circles,
grappling with 90 other scholars of 90 other opinions; he's always forced to
hedge. By contrast, in seconds the Holy Spirit can
make the right connected verses come to your mind, John 14:26. Saves you time, angst,
controversy. Try
it. Use 1John1:9 like breathing, for a
month. Daily. Try to make it a habit. Repeat repeat repeat and it will become as
natural to use the verse, as brushing your teeth.
Then you'll appreciate what Paul means at the end of this verse 7, by
'ploutos'. Seriously. Try it yourself. Words won't suffice; you have to see it in your own life, to know. Use 1John1:9 like breathing, make it a
habit. Watch what happens.
That is the heart of redemption: you are REDEEMED from 'your empty way of
life', as Peter put it, 1Pet1:18. See, all the world has in its mind, is the
world. It has no higher understanding. But you do -- thanks to Redemption. Whether you access this higher way of life,
however, is up to you. Greek word mataios
in Peter (and elsewhere) means 'futile', 'empty', and signifies the
chasing-after-windmills quality of this life.
Chasing your tail, really, for whatever you gain in this life always
bites you at the end.
Instead, the way God thinks, can become the way you
think. Funded on the Cross, paid by
Christ: THAT is True Redemption. Your sin nature will buck it
constantly, theme of Romans 6-8. But you
now have an option for a happiness INDEPENDENT of the world. Independent of circumstances, people, what
you have or lack. Again, try using
1John1:9 repeatedly and daily for a month.. see what happens.
Verse 7 Note, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Second
Clause, reason why you have
redemption: Christ paid. Not with physical blood, but with His
Thinking, Isaiah 53:11's bedato yatsdiq.
'Blood' was what circulated in the animal. Its throat was cut. That cut off the pain, but the poor thing
bled to death. A soul has no corpuscles.
The 'blood' of a soul, is thought. Sins
are thoughts. So only THINKING 'blood' can pay for sins. Just as Isaiah explains: by means of His Mastery of Truth
Knowledge, He makes Righteous. Not,
by bleeding to death.
Third Asset in the eudokian portfolio,
Forgiveness-of-sins: ten aphesin. Sin Insurance.
You name your sin to God, and forget it.
God authorizes the release of funds, as it were, to
FIX you.
Forgiveness
is FUNDED by what Christ paid Father, 2000 years ago.
You are always a Child of God, saved forever. So, there are heavenly living expenses. You live.
You sin. The sin damages your
soul. Now, if your kid needed lunch
money, you'd not say, "well I have it in my bank account" but give
him NOTHING, right?
Okay, so your kid had to ADMIT he needed money. Even so, your Heavenly Father waits for you
to admit you sinned, to justify spending Christ's past payment FOR you, ON
you. Because, your kid might try to get
the money somewhere else. Because, you
might try to 'pay' for your sin, yourself.
Always failing, of course.
You are Christ's property and his 'kid', as
well. His Payment to Father is to be
spent ON you, Isaiah 53:10 contract. But
it won't be spent on you, if you won't use 1John1:9. So you name sins to God and He
what? "purifies you from all
malfeasance (literal translation 1John1:9b)." Insurance policy. Errors and Omissions. Damages paid when they occur. Funded prior, paid now.
Paid to do what?
Develop you spiritually. BUY THE
WORLD, Time. Hopefully
you saw on pages 3 and 4, how vital it is to the world's weal, that you grow
spiritually. Using 1John1:9, is the
greatest and only good deed a human can do.
For only God, is good. So guess
how much God must spank you if you won't use it? YOUR FAULT, if the world is hurt by your not
growing!
That's what ten aphesin means. Sin insurance. All the premiums were paid by Christ 2000
years ago. So USE THE POLICY, 1John1:9. Or you'll never ever
understand Bible, you spit on Christ's Payment;
you hate people, too, for God will only bless them if He grows,
YOU! So you want God to curse THEM, if
you won't use 1John 1:9!
Use The Credit Card =>
(a teenager made for me in 2008)
Fourth
Clause: Note the clever sandwiching placement here. Palindromic, goes forward or backward or
stands alone. Ties back to the first epainon
clause, in verse 6.
The entire passage is like this; each clause stands alone, both
poetically and syntactically, yet there is more. Yeah, always more! And to imagine, this Paul guy was saddled
between two praetorian guards under house arrest in Rome, awaiting Trial. He just DICTATED this right out of his
mouth! So
Paul's flow and thinking here, the awesome GENIUS of it, is a DEMONSTRATION of
the very ploutoi he's talking
about. Living example, genius writing,
easy flow -- Holy Genius, wholly enjoyable!
Verse
Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
First
Clause: Greek perisseuw means to overflow like a flood you very much like:
someone 'flooding' you with a bizillion dollars, for example; opening up the
cargo section of a mid-air C-31 transport, the money only raining
down on you. So the usual translations
are fine, and I used my pastor's, though I'm not too fond of the word
'superabounds'. Too churchy.
Fourth Asset in the eudokian
portfolio,
Every
Class of Wisdom and Clear Thinking:
en pasei sophiai kai phronesei
God authorizes Release of
Christ's Thinking Funds, to Clone Him.. in you.
"For We Have the Thinking of Christ"
1Cor2:16, metron..merous
When we read words like 'wisdom' and -- I forget how translators phrase phronesei,
maybe 'sober judgment' or something equally appalling -- when we read these
words, we sigh in self-righteousness and learn nothing. These words were specifically defined in
Greek culture, made famous by Plato and the other philosophers. To the Greeks, it was all about pleasure on
the one hand, and intellectual stimulation on the other. Wisdom to them was a thinking thing, and phronesis
meant just that: clear thinking. An aphron was a fuzzbrain, someone
incapable of clear thinking, hence the English translation, 'fool'.
So Paul is using very precise terminology here, and in
Greek to Greeks. He's
carefully building on what they already know, and since Ephesians is modeled after Euripides' play
Ion, he's weaving in a famous myth of Greek origin to show them the REAL Origin
of Time, the Real God; so that believers can
successfully communicate the Real Plan of Time, to their fellow Greeks. It's an awesome thing he does, here.
This is also a function of Redemption funding. Here, Paul focuses on the CONTENT of what you
can know. Redemption
itself is a series of funds, so Paul now must list them severally. All of them, subsets of epainon which
is a subset of eudokia. The eudokia
bookends are about purpose; the epainon bookends, result; but in
between, what OPERATION occurs?
So your second asset in the eudokia portfolio,
Redemption, itself has subsets which alike are separate portfolios of their
own.
o APHESIN, Forgiveness-of-Sin assets. You get these each time you use
1John1:9, even if you don't learn and live on Bible. You won't grow, but you are still fixed
enough so you CAN grow. You avoid
illness this way, so USE THE VERSE.
o You grow, as a result of learning
and living on Bible between sins. In
what? WISDOM
and CLEAR THINKING. Bad
decisions come from bad thinking; an
unhappy life comes from bad thinking.
Like a bad computer program, it's difficult to unravel bad
thinking. Bible in your head will
reprogram you, as you consent to learning and living, on it.
o So this is a real asset helping
you in every
category of your life. Hence the pasei, 'every
class'. Whether you're inside or
outside, Bible class. For God hears you
24/7; it won't be pleasing to Him to
hear you think badly. So, He provides a
way to think well. As well as His Son.
o You need wisdom, to rule.
You need to be clear-headed, to rule. It requires much repetition of, 'How do I
apply Bible to this email, this grocery list, this appointment?' For, that's
how you should be thinking, were you wise and clear-headed. This is
Christ's Thinking (next verse), so you get to practice living as Christ did; He was always thinking toward
Father. So every decision had pro's and
con's; and it's a Ruling, to decide between them, as we saw back with the first
eudokia.. thelematos clause, in verse 5.
o So repeating 1John1:9 and
repeating learning and living on Bible will transform your life in a very short
time, less than a year. Even a month. Begin to use the verse habitually, and study
under whomever is your right pastor (ask God who that is). Do that, see what happens.
Verse Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Fifth Asset in the eudokian
portfolio,
Thinking
like Christ:
ynwrisas
..to musterion
God authorizes Biggest
Release of Christ's Thinking Funds, to Clone Him.. in you.
"For We Have the Thinking of Christ"
1Cor2:16, metron..merous
With this verse, Paul concludes his sequential
meter-mapping of Isaiah 53:9-11, in order. He also finishes
mapping to Psalm 90:1-5a. [How clever, to break the 63 into 56+7, tying to BOTH Moses and Isaiah. For at 56, the sum 28+56=84. Oh!
And since Christ is the Last Adam, Paul ties to the first clause in Psalm 90:5 @7 syllables, which
begins the Adamic voting period 'testimony', is about Flood as Divine Judgment,
announced at least 1000 years in advance, by Enoch. At the same
time, 56+7=63, which is 14 short of the 84;
Moses deliberately broke his meter that way (verse 3 ending at 63): for
the Millennium depends on the 14, first completing. Further, Moses didn't subparse the verse at
14, but as 12 and 9, which of course is three sevens; clever way to say Israel will go
overbudget. I didn't see all this at
first, as I mis-parsed Eph1:9 as one unit of 63 syllables. When
auditing eudokian anaphora's meter, however, I learned I had mis-parsed,
so learned of this 56+7 construction.
See: Bible is self-auditing; even
shows how to parse the very syllables, so you can check your elision
assumptions!]
First
Clause: see End Notes b and g. Here
Paul introduces the grand theme of KNOWING CHRIST, the goal of the spiritual
life. Observe that you are to KNOW
Someone, not do something. Paul sets up his prayer in Eph3:15-19, and
the 'destination of life', Greek verb katantaw in Eph4:12, to get the same Maturity
as Christ's Own, Eph4:13. That's the
Rapture criterion of the Body of Christ, and your own personal criterion
for the length of your life.
Paul got there, 2Tim4:6-8; so, like Enoch, his life was over. So we can get there, too.
The word 'mystery' is
new vocabulary, but the concept is thoroughly OT in origin. The typical OT idea was 'hidden'. Paul updates it to 'mystery'
because the term is a culturally-loaded word, in Greek. Thus Paul
UNITES Hebrew and Greek concepts when he invokes the Hidden Understanding
Promise in the 'New Covenant' to Israel, recorded in Jeremiah 31:31-34. The Temple was the stand-in for the Temple to
Come; when He came, He'd be REVEALED,
and His Thinking would therefore also be Revealed, so everyone could get it. 'God with us' was to become 'God in us' --
but until that God the Son took on Humanity, there was no way to GET that
Thinking. For, we have souls, and until
His Own SOUL existed and was built, humans couldn't get that much intimacy. So that's why they had to make do with
angelic visits, rituals, etc. As we can see, they were amazingly skilled with
Scripture, just the same. But the level promised
them was much higher, as it becomes easier to COPY His Soul Structure, once
that Structure exists. Written Bible, is
that Copy. Structure of Principles and
connections. Just as promised.
So that's why Paul uses
the term 'hidden' and 'mystery'. HIDDEN IN CHRIST. Now, revealed, because He came, was
developed, and now has Won, for All Time.
So now, you can know Him intimately. And you come to know Him intimately, only one
way: through Scripture. OT and NT.
Completed now. No dreams,
visions, experiences, etc. That was all
kid stuff, and only demons play those games, now. Holy Spirit only uses Bible. And if you use 1John1:9, learn-and-live-on-Bible,
you'll see how phenomenal a life, it is.
You eventually can think as well as Paul writes, here. I know.
It happens to me often. I
recognize what's happening to Paul when he writes. I've even seen it happen to others who've
only been in the spiritual life, for a year or two! The 'secret' is to use 1John1:9 like
breathing, learn and live on Bible under whomever God appointed personally for
you, as your own pastor; then use Bible as
you know it. Holy Spirit RECALLS Scripture and how it
applies, John 14:26. It's lightning fast. You can test this claim yourself, in your own
life.
And then you will come to know what's hidden to most people, Eph
3:15-19: Christ. Through Scripture. Really know Him. Just as God promised, ever since Jeremiah
31:31-34 (elaborated on in the Book of Hebrews).
Verse 9 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Of course, people like to think that being smart is something they achieved. Not God's Smarts, Rom4:1-2. And of course, even with smarts there's a
certain diligence, it's not magic. God
doesn't just bing the information into your head: it's RECALL He provides, and He CONNECTS THE DOTS. Well, if there's nothing to connect, then
nothing happens. Hence Hebrews 11:6, you
have to ask God, use 1John1:9, and study.
He makes that study supernaturally effective. But hey: some people wanna do it themselves,
and others don't want to do it at all.
In secular life, you can be ignorant or cognizant. Whatever you know, is a 'mystery' to those
who don't know it. Further, you can 'do'
a lot of things and be ignorant at the same time. Which means, someone who knows, will have
to have authority over you, since that other person knows, but you do not. The big bucks for jobs, all require
knowledge. The low bucks for jobs,
don't.
So it is even more true, since
Church's Job is To Rule, that each of us must LEARN God's Thinking. Hidden in Christ, Who pioneered our spiritual
life (favorite theme of my pastor's,
using Hebrews 12:2's Archegos to explain this). Now He is revealed (Greek phanerow), His Thinking can be copied into us, a kind of DDNA as we learn and live on Bible, 1Peter 2:21; and in 2Pet2-3, we have the dire warning of
what happens, when we don't do that. [When I first
realized this 'DDNA' idea from something my pastor said in his year 2000
(summer?) exegesis of Phili 1:20, explaining megalunw -- I excitedly
wrote up a windy but still useful webseries, starting with http://www.brainout.net/DDNA.htm
. Will have to edit that series, for
wordiness. But the content is okay. My pastor taught the same subject for 50
years, with similar jargon.]
Bible=Christ's Thinking, remains a 'mystery' to those who
don't know it. So, God uses
them as peasants: they can
(incompetently) do the small things, like witness, give money to the poor,
endlessly debate kindergarten theology (Hebrews 6:1-6): dip or sprinkle, is God
one or three, is Christ God, do we keep the sabbath, should women
wear hats in church, how do you prove God exists, denominational
squabbles, does the Bible agree with science or contain errors,
etc. ad nauseam. Being children, they think those small things are big
things; so they pride themselves, puff up, swell up and eventually, die as
ignorant as they were re-born. It's
heartbreaking. They never learn the Real
Spiritual Life; nor will they brook being informed of it, either. They deem themselves spiritual giants,
2Cor10:12. But at least their lives
aren't wholly lived in vain, Isa54:1. Wa-tsahali,
lo-hala!
By contrast, those who learn and live on God's Word,
spend their time instead on bible. So to compensate
for the time they AREN'T busy like
peasants, the learning-Christ believers spend five seconds to PRAY; hence the poor will be kitted out, to
bustle. Christ wasn't kidding when He said,
Ask Anything in My Name and I will do it. [Jn. 14:13f; 16:26.] So,
YOU study; the peasants who won't, can do what you should NOT do.
A peasant prides himself on his lowness.
So if you refuse to be low, you are called arrogant. The peasant is the one who's arrogant. So all you can do with him, is give him
something low to do. His arrogance
competes with learning, so he doesn't learn well. He deems learning, snooty. He deems it snotty. Or, he compliments those who do learn, as
a substitute for learning, himself.
For he deems learning valuable, only
to get status, recognition or approval; the learning itself has no value, to him. He projects his prejudices onto anyone who
does learn. So the one learning will
advance, even in secular culture. So the
one not learning retards, even in secular culture. So humans end up unequal, even if of equal
innate talent. And frankly, learning is
more the product of desire than intelligence.
IF you want to learn, you will keep on doing it, even if
difficult for you. Hence, society is
filled with people of unequal status, as it is filled with people of unequal
desire to learn. The status, comes from competence
in using what you learn (ideally).
That's how it is in heaven, too. How well did you learn and live on Bible?
is the sole Reward Inquiry at the Bema, 1Cor3.
This, is warranted. No one expects
the Queen of England to sweep the floor.
She orders the floor swept, and someone else, does it. You are training for a Royal Ruling
Inheritance aka 'crown', under the King of the Universe. So your job is to learn His Thinking, not
sweep the floor!
See: the rich person orders a thing be done, five seconds.
The poor one does it, five months. Thus the poor will have employment at his own
(self-chosen) level; since he won't become rich in Christ. You don't ask kids to do adult jobs. And we train to be adults, no longer children,
Eph4:14. A child didn't pray Daniel 9. Yet even a child, can pray.
Verse 9 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Christ spent His Time learning Word, not hustling about
with good deeds. By the end,
only sin was a 'mystery' to Him; that
is, until Father poured out all sins in history onto Him, 2Cor5:21. So there is no mystery to learning Him, nothing about God or His Word you can't know.
All that, Paul says in this clause (and in nearly
every verse he writes).
Training in thinking requires coordination with the body, so it's not
like you sequester yourself with The Book.
You live a quasi-normal life. But
you don't value the deeds of themselves;
they are training aids, only.
When you wash the dishes, there's some doctrine you can associate,
to learn ruling better. Same with
other daily activities. And THAT is the
difference. The peasant, is all do do
dodo doo-doo. But you are using Bible as you do
whatever, and thus learning to THINK in a coordinated manner.
Different purpose. Much bigger
results. Royal, even.
So like Christ, we are to ROYALLY
spend our time LEARNING WORD, Deuteronomy 8:3 parlayed into Matthew 4:4. The devil wanted Christ to do peasant stuff there, did
you notice? Feed
the poor by making ALL the stones become bread: thus
Satan threw rocks at Christ Learning Bible, rather than eat.
'Fasting' in Mosaic Law, was to Save Time For Study. My pastor
covered that fact a bizillion times, when the topic arose during his
teaching. This is quite
understandable: even in secular life, if
you've got something to do but need food, you might grab a quick snack and eat
at the computer, in the car, etc.; or, forego eating entirely, until you get
that something, done. For eating is a
distraction, and takes time. Even in our
modern age.
But religious peasants both in OT and ever after, hating learning,
of course instead glorify the BODY ACT of not eating, to make it spiritual. Get the pun?
They won't eat Word, so glorify Not
Eating. And of course, not
eating food is no more spiritual, than eating it. So fasting was never
a spiritual thing in the Law. Rather, to bypass the hassle of preparing,
cooking, and eating food, was a convenience; and you trusted God to keep
your body alive, the meanwhile. So it was a hope
God would keep you healthy, while you learned His Word more intensively. And of course, God wants you to learn, so the
hope is justified. So when Bible records people fasting, that's
shorthand: they took time off to intensively study Word, i.e., Daniel 10
(for Darius the Mede had just died), Matthew 4.
Consequently, hate-Word-Study peasants twist the bypassing-food
convenience into a status symbol, bypassing
ho Logos, for fasting.
Hence status replaced eating Word; the peasant 'fasts' away from
it. So, God will bypass his rewards at
the Bemata, Zech 7. For We are
His Temple: we are only built, by eating Word as He did.
Jump from the Temple, Second Temptation: wow peasants
to believe in Him, in lieu of
relying on Father's Witness to His Own Son's Learning Word. Again, a body
stunt. In lieu of, spiritual gymnastics
only the Spirit can do in your head.
Barnum and Bailey, oooh and aaah, rather than shocked reverence at
Gorgeous Word.
Take over the kingdoms of the world by
zapping Satan, Third Temptation:
again, a body politic, rather than a spiritual politic. So Christ was impolitic, not to solve the
world's body problems, instead
becoming the Spiritual Head the Body should copy. Get the Royal difference?
Thus ends the first eudokian bookend. Mystery
revealed, Now in Writing, no longer hidden: to the one who Learns Word as
Christ did.
We have all spiritual blessings, Eph1:3.
Here we've seen the Body of Thinking we're to Learn,
The Very Thinking of Our Lord Jesus the Christ.
Hidden From (since He wasn't born yet)
and Drooled Over for centuries,
by millions of OT believers
.. now Revealed to us!
Ahem.. and
hence the Portfolio we have and don't use, to become like Christ.
Verse 9 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
2nd
'bookend' in the eudokian
anaphora.
This
second bookend 'encloses' what went between it and the first bookend. At the same time, it starts a new bookend
pair, which ends verse 11. Notice the word order of this second bookend,
is REVERSED. When Bible writers reverse
the order of all or some of the same words as previously written, they BOOKEND
the passage.
The writer of Hebrews, for example, does that
with Jeremiah 31:31-34, quoting it from the LXX in Hebrews 8:8-12. He reverses the order of keywords in Hebrews
10:15-17. Peasants mistake that reversal
as an error. No, it's a rhetorical
style. In Hebrews, writer stresses the DESTINATION of Heb8:8-12, the Holy
Spirit interrupting his flow of writing, even: to make the point via reversal,
in Hebrews 10:15-17. Just as a bookend
'mirrors' in reverse, its left counterpart.
Bookending is a rhetorical device showing a full-circle
effect. First, purpose is given, and in a certain
word order. At the end of that
'paragraph' or section, the opening lines are reversed to explain that what is
'between', has now fulfilled its initial purpose. Or, how its initial purpose WILL be
fulfilled, as here.
Secondly, bookending
acts as a WALL. To wall off anything else as irrelevant or
excluded, from what's BETWEEN the bookends.
That's what Paul does here. Only those assets listed between the 'bookends' are
from God in Christ. So, he
tells you that nothing 'outside' these assets, are spiritual:
o
verse
6's epainon, Grace Glory Asset
(see epainon
anaphora)
which only God can make. Can you make
Glory? Nope.
o
verse
7's apolutrwsin, Redemption
Funds to grow you; so you can't
'redeem' your bad thinking, either;
o
verse
7's aphesin, Forgiveness-of-sins
Account you use as needed, in time; for
maybe you won't use 1John1:9, and thus retard. For apart from the Spirit, you won't grow, but
will peasantly imagine growth, 1John1:6, 8, 10.
o
verse
8's pasei sophiai kai phronesei,
'all wisdom and clear-thinking', which only GOD can 'superabound' for
you;
o
verse
9's ynwrisas to musterion,
'making known past-hidden content' of Christ; ONLY God can put
Christ's Head in your soul.
So notice: no good
deeds are listed here. Not one. Only God-deeds. So observe:
o
You
cannot glorify God yourself. God
has to do it TO you. That's epainon.
o
You
cannot redeem your self, your past, your bad habits, your failures, your
sins. God alone can fix you. This isn't a salvation question. This is a post-salvation issue of you still
being as you were before salvation: how do you grow up, now that you are
saved? You have to grow up spiritually,
just as you had to grow up physically or mentally.
o
You
cannot make yourself spiritually wise, since
o
GOD makes known the Bible. So the only way you can grasp it, is through
God. So now you know why there's so much
dissension and controversy in Christianity, and false doctrine: people are all trying to do it on their own
power, but right here from verse 9 you see GOD MUST MAKE KNOWN the
information, or it's a 'mystery' to you.
So bookending tells you that only what's INSIDE,
counts. What's outside, does not. And what's outside? Anything you can do. If you could do it, Christ wouldn't have to
pay for it. Not one of the above assets
is phrased as something you do, but rather something you HAVE or GET from
God. Only from God. Not from works, not from emotion, not from
rituals, not from any other activity humans do or attributes humans have. Got that?
Paul uses THREE eudokian
bookends, however. So this second
bookend, begins a nested sequel:
Verse 5,
eis auton kata ten
eudokian tou thelematos autou.
Verse 9 mirrors:
tou thelematos autou kata ten eudokian
autou.
Verse 11 concatenates verse 5 and 9
into one simple clause: kata ten boulen tou
thelematos autou.
So now go to verse
11's bookend in
the eudokian anaphora...
Verse 9 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
The Meal of Christ, Set
Before Us:
proetheto en autwi
a third nested
anaphora,
First
word in this Trio, Greek proetheto, is a technical term for Temple
offering. It tells you these are Christ's
OWN spiritual assets; that God
places them In Him and thus Before You, like a meal to be eaten. This clause is soundplay on and setup for, verse 11's prothesin, Temple Shewbread. God
treats Time as a meal, and He wants that meal to be His Son's Thinking. So
this is about meal preparation, just as all Temple sacrifices,
depicted. For each of us lives on
thought, Job34:3, Matt4:4, even Proverbs 23:6:
true 'soul food'. So physical
food metaphorically represents how thoughts -- especially God's --
'taste'. So just as you present a
meal for guests, how much more, your thoughts? Ooops.
Proetheto is the
first of three passage keywords for Firstfruits Presentation. See also Verse Notes 11
and 12. Usually
translated 'purpose', verb protithemi's root connotation is to set something before someone, and
when in the middle voice as here, it's most often used for setting forth a
meal you are going to eat. That was
the entire Representation of the Temple.
So the verb shouldn't be translated 'purpose', since the first meaning
is to publicly set forth something for
consumption, i.e., look at it,
venerate it, eat it, comment on it, have it as an offer.. Vote On Him.
So 'published' is part of the
meaning, but still too short; this isn't
merely information to know. Paul
talks back to epouraniois in
Verse 3, How We Are On Public Display,
due to Our Head.
We
now have the SAME Assets Christ Had, to 'eat' for our own spiritual life. My pastor stressed that
when he exegeted Ephesians, a long doctrine he called "our Portfolio Of Invisible Assets". [I've never seen anyone else
supply such a comprehensive, fitting explanation. Ephesians usually gets short shrift, with
pastors focusing on the morality sections, making a sermon or two on being
faithful to your spouse or rearing your kids properly. WE'RE TOTALLY RICH AND ROYAL but have no clue
of our vast eternal wealth? Kill me
now.]
The spiritually immature have a
lot of tangled notions. One of them, is
that it's somehow a sin to be rich. To
be successful. To be famous. Truth is, those are tools you need, to do
something of value in the world. The
best things in life are free; but to get
those things, will cost money and time.
So the more you have of both, the more you can focus on value-added
activities.
So God means to make us
rich. This isn't a prosperity
Gospel. This is about Father Being
High and Perfect so the Standard is High and Perfect so demands High and
Perfect Wealth, to MEET THE STANDARD. A poor person can't do that. So the spiritually-poor, 99% of Christianity,
assign poor ideas of 'worship' and 'spirituality' to God, chiefly in the form
of behavioral observances, morals and good deeds. This is roughly equivalent to a trio of ants
arguing over which of them gave YOU the biggest 'ball of sugar'. That's important to ants, but it doesn't mean
a hill of beans, to you. So there they
are, all proud of themselves and fighting over whose ball of sugar is the most
'holy'. Get the point?
Divine Currency is Bible in
your head. Not sugary good
deeds. And that means WEALTH. Christ called it "true riches". If you got the latter, you can PRAY for
whatever good deeds you want done. And
the spiritually-poor will be equipped to do them, since they reject learning
Bible, in favor of body things with people -- while you the rich one, go on
learning God via God's Word.
To whom much is given, much is
expected. Muchness is a SITTING thing.
Peasants, do. Royals, think and
talk. And, that's all the Bible ever
records of Christ. Go through the
Gospels, see for yourself, Isaiah 53:11, bedato yatsdiq, by means of
Mastering Truth Knowledge, He makes Righteous! Who?
The peasants, the many. You and
me. How?
By His THINKING TRUTH.
Where? On the Cross! He didn't die physically to pay for sins;
physical death never 'paid' for anything.
Your brain can't think, once you've died.
Verse 9 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
When a soldier dies on duty, we
honor him, and rightfully so. But the
death ended that duty. So the honor is
due to his willingness, while still alive, to keep on fighting, even TO death.
So even the soldier, doesn't die for us; he LIVED for us, even to the point
of death. That's what Isaiah 53:12,
says. Thinking thinking thinking
fighting fighting fighting even if it kills you.
It takes a long time to train,
and even in the case of a foot soldier, 90% of what he must 'do', is
THINK. Assess terrain. Gauge distance and enemy intent. Analyse what he hears. Conclude supplies and deployments. Think think think. Hurry up and wait. So all that repetition of thinking a
bizillion times, coordinating the big thinking with the little (deft!)
movements, makes a good soldier.
A
blundering hackblade painted with woad, thundering in an open field, is
easily cut down.
So we aren't peasants with
clumsy-but-impressive broadswords, now; but with the two-edged machaira. Surgery.
But 90% of us, prefer to blunder about, rather than learn. So we make good Satan-fodder. Takes years to learn how to perform
surgery. It's tough. The easy works and easy rituals, feel-good
songs, are easier than study. Yet we're
in training to rightly divide the Word of Truth. Yet we instead live like peasants,
spiritually poor, ignorant of the value, of Thinking Doctrine? Living instead on our feelings, our rah-rah
Jesus songs, on how people think of us, on morality or rituals and good
deeds? Then we're just like that ancient
Celtic warrior thinking his blue paint will protect him, that running
full-speed at a smart enemy, will frighten the enemy off. Guess again.
I don't know if you've noticed,
but in Christianity there's a 90% attrition rate. That means, only 10 out of a 100 people who
initially believe in Christ, still believe in Him by life's end. Something always happens to
'disappoint'. God didn't 'deliver' in
some key way, and the now-disgruntled believer, goes into some other religion
or becomes an atheist. Know why? No
Bible Properly Learned. Every
atheist on Youtube who tells his deconversion tale, didn't learn the Bible
properly. He was filled with false
doctrine, even on basics like the Gospel;
and so was everyone in his periphery.
So of course he came to disbelieve.
False doctrines are always silly.
But the Real Word understood, not only makes sense, but has a better
explanation you can TEST -- than anything man can counter. Guaranteed.
But of course you can't know
that until you know IT. The Word. You don't know Bible if you can recite
it. That's like knowing ABCs. You have to ACCOUNT for every doctrine you
know; ACCOUNT, for why some other
idea is wrong. You must precisely
know one verse from another; and why
seeming contradictions, aren't. That's
how a surgeon must think. A lawyer. A doctor.
And with the Spirit's power, you are INTENDED TO BE smarter than any of
them. You are intended, to become as
smart as Christ Himself, Eph1:14 and 4:13!
Shocking, huh. But think: anything less than Christ, we recognize as
insufficient. So: can't the same Holy Spirit, Who Made The
Christ Able To Endure The Cross, Make Us Like Him? Sure He can.
His Power, not ours.. so no limits, due to ours.
But you won't even come close
to being as smart as Christ, if you don't use those
eudokian assets. For those
assets, turn you into First Fruits: for
o if you
eat what God proetheto'd,
o then
you will be prothesin, and
o thus
you are proelpikotas.
o Ahead.
First in line. Not
better, but front-line;
while those believers who aren't using the same assets as you have, are far off
doing something else they mistake, as spiritual. Again, why do you think I sound so
smart? Because I use 1John1:9 and thus
God spends His assets on me. No other
reason.
So if you're not using 1John
1:9 like breathing, all your assets lie fallow;
since you lie to God, and to yourself. That's what the
stingy servant did, Luke 19:20. You're
not spiritual, but as 1John1:8 says, you imagine that you are. For people epainon our behavior, our
Christian songs and buzzwords, our spouting Bible verses we really don't
understand.. and then we end up skinny, having fasted from the Word for too
long; we secretly feel God didn't reward
us as we should have been rewarded, for being so faithful. And we end, a 90% casualty, Psalm 90:7, 9 --
though Psalm 90:8 was paid on our behalf, 2000 years ago.
Verse 9 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Yeah, my pastor drilled
the above into the congregation's head until you can't forget it. That was his goal. Now, it's mine. I can't honor God if I'm
spiritually-poor! Honor means you
give something worthy to someone worthy, by that
person's standards. And the Only
Standard, is what? The Way, The Truth
and the Life. Thinking like Him,
1Cor2:16.
So much of what I've had to publish, exposes
long-beloved myths in common Christian playpens. Much of that material comes from
Bible classes I'd heard under my pastor; but I independently found the same
material in Bible, so he can't be blamed for what I write or say. He is blamed, severally: for much of what he said for 53 years, he
also proved from Scripture, and his own words are recorded live; no one need rely on hearsay. Much to the consternation of many in
conservative Christendom, he proved that Christianity is IN the playpen, from
Scripture. He tried to be nice about it,
but a spade is a spade. Integrity
demands honesty, and Justice requires disclosure. So he gave it.
The
Bible is the BIBLE, and it's high time we paid attention to it again, rather than cloistering around fake elites; or, thumping it on our
thighs as we sing Rah-Rah Jesus and argue with the atheists over a 6-day initial
creation, no Bible ever teaches.
Bible
scholarship has been abysmal, starting with the
so-called 'Church Fathers' (of apostasy!) as many scholars even know; yet no
one fesses up to the sheep and corrects the centuries-long errors?? Instead, the errors are taught! We justify silence, based on a
politically-convenient abuse of
'Christian love'. You don't
love people if you don't love God, says 1John. We surely don't love
God, for we make nice with egregious interpretations, mistranslations and false
doctrines, in the name of Christian unity?!
And
that Unity is long broken, precisely because the sheep aren't getting the TOOLS
taught to them, so they can see for THEMSELVES what Bible really says. My pastor taught us the Hebrew
and Greek vocabulary as he went along, using the KJV (and later NASB) as his
base; when the translation was wrong, he
just told us the mss information, corrected the translation, and moved
on. We groaned over the detail, we were
bored with the technicalities; but we didn't condemn, those who made
mistakes; for we ourselves make a
billion mistakes, every day. No
problem. Window broke, you fix it and
move on. So we lost no respect for
Bible teachers and authorities; if
anything, we respect them the more; for when you see their errors, you can
easily appreciate how they were made; we
humans have a rough life. So, respect
for the discipline (and politics!) of academia, heightened.
For if
the sheep aren't told, they WILL find out through the enemy, i.e., from the atheists or other group who knows where bodies are
buried. Then, the sheep turn away from
their denomination or church, in distrust. They weren't trained like we were, to just
accept the mistakes as one learns, since we all make mistakes, no big deal. So, that's why you have a 90% attrition rate
in Christianity, bread from an unholy trinity:
False doctrine is taught; Mistakes aren't corrected;
Pride of protecting past scholars,
matters more than proving Bible's INTEGRITY;
Pride of political position within
one's group, matters more than the primacy of God's WORD.
No
wonder people quit. The Christian doctrinal window is broken in many
places: Replace
The Window. Then, move
on. Mistakes are the norm, and
expected. No shame in making them. But covering them up, pretending the doo-doo is chocolate? That will be exposed at the
Bema. The past scholars who made
mistakes, now living in heaven, will have their reproach REMOVED if we
clean up after them, here in the 21st century. Wouldn't we want the same favor, done for
us? God knows He made the materials
easier than ever, to learn and use! End
Commercial Message.
Verse Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
First
Clause
Sixth Asset in the eudokian portfolio,
eis
oikonomian tou pleromatos twn kairwn
Estate
Management of Time
Giving Birth
to Eternity,
via
Pregnancy House, Church!
I maintain that a majority of Christian confusion, even
among those who can read Hebrew and Greek, is due to them not 'getting' Bible's
wordplay; not noticing, key rhetorical
styles used to convey vital doctrines we all haggle over. Every verse in Bible employs deft
wordplay, and all the scholars know it exists.
Maybe they are overworked; maybe
it's politics; but for whatever reason,
the wordplay is not taught the sheep;
yet when the sheep read Bible, they seize on what wordplay they find..
but they don't find much. Translations
rarely capture the humor. It's not
Christian to be funny, I guess.
Wordplay is rife in Judaism. Yeah,
they got that keen sense of what's funny, ironic, wry -- from Bible. We Christians, think it's not respectable to
be witty. God must be boring to be
majestic. And so the translations bland
Him out, clothe His naked wit and do all sorts of other things in translation
to make it acceptable to translation committees and their bored-with-Bible-but-I-need-it-as-a-status-symbol
public. Our Puritan background has done
us much harm.
Puritans don't like pregnancy wordplay. Not respectable. Too bad, but that's what this verses is
about, a play on Chronos, the god of Time who ate his kids as soon as they were
born, aka Saturn, aka the Saturnalia festival which was occurring on the very
day the Lord Jesus Christ was born.
First day of Chanukah, to the Jews. Wittily, God told Zerubbabel that would be
the Lord's Birthday, back when only the Foundation was laid, on 24-nearly-25
Chislev, 521 bc. You can read all about it in Haggai 2. So the not-yet-built 2nd Temple, would, 357
years later, become the object of desecration by a demented Antiochus IV, who
thought he was Epiphanes. So the
lights went out, in the Temple. So the
lights went on 2300 days after Anti-baby ran over Egypt, and the Temple
instituted the Feast of Dedication, Chanuk=Enoch, to herald the Lord's Birth,
164 years later to the day. Paul uses
this fact, to craft the syllables for the eudokian anaphora.
The Catholics, maybe got it right by accident.
You have to know all that background, to get this verse. Christ was born to SAVE TIME from
ending. You have to know the Doctrine of
Time (summarized on pages 3 and 4 of this document), to understand this
verse. Church is the BRIDGE to complete
Time. Messiah's Time. Owed Him from the Exodus forward. Recorded by Moses. Updated by Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9. Clearly discernible in their meter. And totally unknown, if you don't know the
meter. Worse, if you know the Jews still
have this 'thing' about the times, you won't understand they get it from Bible,
which Paul here invokes.
The 'Estate Management of Time': oikonomian=estate management, twn kairwn=Time; in plural,
because there are specific epochs in God's Management of Time. First epoch,
Adamic, ending with Abraham. Second of the kairoi was Jewish Time, from Abraham
to Christ. Who Came and Left the
Building, Cornerstone Rejected, but He paid for a
yet-to-be-born Bride, Church,
having contracted to BUY her in Matthew 16:18, ratifying it to Father's
Discretion, John 17:17-23. That's why we're here, and that's why this
verse is here.
It becomes an Asset of Church, this
Bridging Role He legated to us, which Father 'manages'. It becomes an asset, for those
who use the first five, are On Trial as Christ was; if they successfully pass the Endurance Test,
they will be crowned kings like Paul was, in 2Tim4:6-8. And they will end up ruling their Isaiah
53:12 'atsumim' portion of Church.. forever.
During the Millennium, these same kings will each rule over one or more
Gentile nations on earth. Whether the
Church believers will rule with them, I can't yet prove. My pastor speculated that the rest of Church
will just be looking on.
Verse 10 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So let's get into the Greek here, because your average
joe-blow preterist would balk at this interpretation. That, because he doesn't know
Bible's doctrine of Time, so he doesn't know how to cross-reference the Greek
here, to learn it. And, he has almost no
respect, even if knowledge, about the cultural allusions of Paul, since after
all the Greeks were pagan. Huff.
Paul isn't writing to pagans, but
Christians. They are Greeks, so why not
use cultural concepts they know, to illustrate Bible truths? If I use a stoplight to
illustrate the Gospel as a GO only
if you believe, and stop if you
never believe, that's a helpful thing to do.
So, that's what Paul does: use ideas the Greeks understood. And we know what those ideas, were. So we too can know exactly, apprehending
the very thought of the writer, the goal of hermeneutics.
So, the Greek:
εἰς
οἰκονομίαν
τοῦ
πληρώματος
τῶν καιρῶν 252 G
To Result in the 'Filling-Up of Times'
Dispensation;
Now, word by word:
εἰς Preposition of Destination. Here, the 'destination' of TIME itself. Hence translated like a verb, in English. In Drama Greek you drop verbs and substitute
nouns, participles, and prepositions with verbal force. That's what Paul does throughout this
passage.
οἰκονομίαν Term means 'estate
management', idea of a PROPERTY you own, including all the personal goods
within it. God owns everything, and TIME
is something God owns. So to merely
truncate the meaning to 'administration' is both vague and misleading. 'Dispensation' in English comes closer to the
idea here: idea of something you own that you DISPENSE, use, administer
according to your own authority, since you own it. Here, Time.
τοῦ
πληρώματος Greek pleroma means a
fullness of 'cargo', whether in a ship or in a woman. It is a favorite term of Paul's to signify birthing, on the verge of full-term delivery.
Sexual connotation is redolent in Greek usage, especially with respect
to time and maturation. For the Greek god Chronos would
eat his children as they were born (concept of time
eating away). Translators
and lexicographers are chary of explaining this kind of 'fullness'; but you
won't appreciate the Bible's use of the term if you don't know its cultural
meaning. Consider, Paul is writing to
Greeks who well know and would smile at this term. They would immediately value what Paul meant.
So literally, Paul writes 'resulting in the Dispensation of the Pregnancy Fullness of Time'. It makes for awkward
English, and had more syllables than he used in Greek.
τῶν
καιρῶν literally, 'of the times', but you have to
know that kairos means an epoch
of time which
has a particular covenant attached to it, when used in the
Bible. So for the plural, the best
English translation would be 'Dispensations';
but that would be repetitive, and I didn't have enough Greek
syllables. The genitive is descriptive,
acting like an adjective for oikonomia.
The phrase thus means that this Dispensation
Of Church Completes The Estate Management Of Time. The reader who is already familiar
with the Old Testament promises to Israel, therefore, would realize that this
phrase signifies several things:
o Church is the Time Bridge back to the Completion of the Time
Promise to Israel, now vested in Christ, just as Moses had written, back in
Psalm 90.
o That's why Paul also benchmarks
syllable 252
in Psalm 90, which
points to Psalm 90:13, which asked, 'Return Oh Lord, How Long?' Thus Moses' prayer is answered by Church. For Church thus bridges back to the promised
Tribulation, hence the Promised Millennium, which Moses wrote about, reserving
the Time in the first 84 syllables of Psalm 90.
o We Church have an Inheritance IN this
Completion (q.v.,
verse 11), so our 1Cor3 awards will relate to how our growth was used to
achieve this goal;
o Satan is tactically defeated in the Angelic Conflict.
Verse 10 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
That last point about Satan's
defeat is variantly understood in Christendom. Nearly
every denomination realizes we Church are collectively a testimony in some
vague way, which proves God right and Satan wrong. There is a lot of variance in the explanations
given for this 'testimony'. Point is, we
know at least something about it. Since
Satanology isn't well defined in Christendom, you'll have to analyze or mull
over the points below. Or, come up with
your own.
I spent about
10 years writing up an analysis of God versus Satan, trying to see the Big
Picture from Adam forward, about this Trial.
The writeup begins in http://www.brainout.net/LordvSatan1.htm
, and that page also functions as an overview of the Trial Issues. The rest of its links (which run maybe 1500 printed pages), trace the history from what I understand in
the Bible, based largely also on what my pastor taught about the Conflict for
53 years. I was trying to make sense of
the data we have, and what he taught. So
if you're interested, you can skim through or read that material.
The upshot, is
this:
o Satan claims God is unfair to give creatures (then, only the angels), free will to fail. Especially, because God knows they will
fail. So they should not suffer
penalty for using what God gave them.
o Satan and his allies thus rebelled. So although man was going to be created
anyway for the angels to rule (that is a conclusion), now man's creation is to demonstrate why Satan is wrong, and THE MAN will pay for human sins (I maintain angelic sins were also paid for,
based on the lower-than language in Hebrews 2, but that topic is not
germane now).
o Even so, even with His Success at the Cross (theme of Hebrews 2), thus defeating Satan and being awarded the other kingship of psalm 110, the
question remains -- where's
the Kingdom to go with that Crown?
o Bride of Christ?
Well then a Bride must be
worthy of Her Husband.
o So, we get the same Trial terms as He had, sans actually paying for mankind's sins
on the Cross, since He already did that.
o So we get the same spiritual assets, and the same responsibility (again, short of paying for all sins, since He did that).
My pastor taught the above bullets
extensively over his ministry. Book of Hebrews is not the only
place where you can see those points validated, but it's a great summary book
on the topic. So far as I can tell, no
one but my pastor ever covered the topic (especially from Hebrews) as
comprehensively. So I refer you to his
classes in Ephesians, Hebrews and Spiritual Dynamics, all live recordings
available from http://www.rbthieme.org.
Second Clause Here a literal
translation is better, to show the full meaning of this very long Greek word.
Third Clause Paul uses ta panta
as a bullet point. Sweeping language,
and clever double-entendre on the nickname for Christ as The All Things.
Fourth Clause Same idea as in third
clause, abbreviated to 'ta'. It's
considered good Greek rhetoric to shorten expressions to their (nee: definite)
articles whenever possible, especially in dramatic repetition, as here.
Fifth Clause Same idea as in
fourth clause.
Verse
Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
First clause: the kai in
Greek is an 'emphatic kai'. I
should redden,
bold and make kai
16
points high. This is a most climactic verse, as you'll soon see. It should be impossible to top verse 10's
drama, but Paul does! Impossible not
to know God Wrote This Book! I
shouldn't be allowed to see this and live.
Preview of coming
distractions: YOU, dear believer (and me too), INHERIT Christ's
OWN Victory Over Satan
(verse 10),
which wraps up all history. We could
know that from Hebrews 1 and 2, from Psalm 110: for Christ's Kingship invoked
to create Church in Matt16:18 PREDATED His Jewish Kingship: hence
we even exist. Okay, but INHERIT alongside
Him? Oh yeah! That's why Eph4:13 reads as it does! We should all be executed at once, for not
using Our Divine Assets!
Temple
Shewbread, prothesin
the second keyword in our third
nested anaphora,
Second
clause, prothesin, alters how you read
Ephesians. This is the second keyword in the third
anaphora Paul creates in the passage, which here we'll call Temple Trio. This
is another specialized word. Paul isn't
talking about any ol' plan, but rather, Temple Shewbread. It's the second of three Temple keywords Paul
uses to draw analogy. See also Verse 9's and Verse 12's notes on proetheto and proelpikotas,
respectively.
This Trio proves Juridical
Consistency With Prior Covenants.
Again, Paul stresses Church has her own covenant, but that brings up the
issue of Whether It's Fair To Make The
Change. So, he wants to show not
only that it's fair, but consistent
with what Israel had; again, to head off
jealousy over the Jews. You know how
jealous or puffy we humans get when someone has something different from 'our'
stuff.
And frankly, that's
what shows up here, a deliberate coverup of what translators know, is a JEWISH
term.
[I'm sure they decided, "well, the sheep
won't understand this, and it will take too long to explain": to which I say, 'Balderdash!' If God uses a special word, it should be
specially translated, and then TAUGHT to the sheep. My pastor taught it; we the congregation didn't vomit (well, some
did). We learned. And yeah, for awhile it was boring to study
the entire Levitical-sacrifice structure, just to know what this one word
meant. But worth it! Why do you think I sound so
competent? Why do you think I have so
much confidence in the Word? Because I
UNDERSTAND it! Confidence comes from
understanding SCRIPTURE, not from patting people on the head, or rah-rah Jesus
songs.]
So to
mistranslate prothesin as merely 'plan' or 'purpose', masks Paul's
tracking of TEMPLE, both in
his meter, and in the text. For Paul
points to Daniel 9 as Precedental job for CHURCH. So let's review what that means.
The Temple was Bible in
Architecture,
As Temple Portrayed the Promised Word-Becomes-Flesh.
90% of
what Christians 'know' about Bible is flashcard knowledge. They don't know why there was a Temple; they grow up hearing of it as holy, good;
and they unthinkingly accept what they hear, as they only care about
fitting-in. So they never know what
it represented. Neither do the Jews. They piously and daily bob at the Wailing
Wall, see it live on the Kotel webcam, from Aish.com! So much tsav
l'tsav. So very very much lev, lo-lev. It's heartbreaking.
Accordingly,
for centuries the hoi pouloi in every religion on the planet rotely
engage in pet rituals, the sacred buildings obsessively venerated by all,
visited, photographed; yet what do those buildings mean? People don't know. To them, the buildings are holy, and you're
holy too if you visit them. Bob
and nod, say you've been there, it's all a status symbol of cheap
substitutes. You gaze-to-praise
a building, to take the place of, Building in the Word. Bob at a Wall, for Scripture is a Wall
to you: sounds to recite at church,
shul, bar/bat mitzvah, claim you've done mitzwot; chant the Kaddish, give luck to the
dead. All in lieu of, Learning What
Word the Temple Depicted. Yeah, ho
logos einai nekros, in you.
Verse 11 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
By
contrast, the dead-but-expensive stones of God's Jerusalem Temple, depicted
Live Word-To-Come. Bible's 'Temple'
means 'God Dwelling With Us': promise of
savior to come. Every feature was
a metaphor of something ABOUT Him.
My pastor stressed that fact a thousand times, when exegeting Temple OT
passages.
o
2Samuel 7, David had finished conquering Jerusalem,
built himself a nice palace to live in.. but God was 'living' in a tent! That upset David.
o
So,
he asked the prophet Nathan about it.
Get the witty setup, here: Nathan was one of David's younger sons
through Bathsheba, hence the progenitor of Mary.
o
So,
God gave Nathan one of the wittiest Divine Promises in Scripture: Oy gevalt! (Look-how-I'm-qvetching-but-really-pleased-You-CARE): What house can contain Me? Ho-kay, I give up, you can make a Temple for
Me. And by the way, I'll make a House of
Sons for you FOREVER, such a mensch!
o
God's
Wit is hysterical, even in translation!
Go read 2Sam7!
o
I hope you know, huge chunks of Bible are on
Temple Architecture in extreme detail, i.e., 1Chron24 et seq., all of Ezekiel
after Chapter 39. So here is this God
Who loudly 'protests' at HAVING a house, yet is positively anal ABOUT that
House, even as He was about Tent-of-Meeting specs with Moses!
o
Upon
which Temple The Christ, a later son of Nathan -- played, in John
14: I go to Build a House for you. House of Sons. He
Who Had No Descendants Will Birth All, Isaiah 53:8, 12, 54:1!
The
wit never ends, in God's Word. How can
you not fall in love with it? With
Him??
But
until He came, how to depict Him? Since
Bible was serially formed?
Architecture, baby. Jacob's sons were
construction slaves under Pharaoh (not agricultural slaves, duh). 400 years of
building prowess, now used.
So, pending completion of Canon in writing, you
learned the same material by the densely-packed metaphors in each article and
ritual of the Temple and its worship.
Temple stood for Temple to Come in the Flesh, as a result of Whom
you'd have the Law written in your hearts, Jeremiah 3:16 compared to
Jer31:31-34. Because, until He Took on
Humanity, there was No Soul To be The CopyBook. [Petrine term hupogrammos
(1Pet2:21), a tablet kids used to learn
how to write letters.] You couldn't yet become a COPY of Him.
Meanwhile,
Temple and its allied activities were like daily life; you'd recall the sacred meanings, while
you did your secular duties. So
you'd 'copy' those meanings in your head, thus finally enjoying the
day's banalities and frustrations. Yeah,
God uses low things, like flying ovens, to
make covenants! [Genesis
15:17. Just imagine, the next time Abraham used an oven or peed, he'd recall
what God meant! My pastor reminded us of
that, often.]
Book of
Hebrews shows how this Temple To Come, Finished His Task; so now His Thinking
can be built in you, just as promised.
That theme elaborates on what Paul says, here. So let's notice:
o
Temple depicts the Body of Christ en toto. Every feature.
o
Lampstands symbolize the Doctrine (Light) in Him, the
Holy Spirit enabling Him.
o
Sacrifices memorialize what HE would do to please
Father and thus pay for our sins.
o
So the Temple Shewbread signify Him
'harvested';
and at the same time, believers 'harvested' due to Him. Bread of the Presence. Wheat was grown, harvested, prepared; and now, baked for God to
'eat'. It takes THINKING, to make
bread. Our sins were Paid by the Bread
of Heaven THINKING on the Cross, Isaiah 53:11.
o
So, He had to be Prepared. So, you have to prepare FOR Him. preparation, Greek paraskeué,
comes from 'container', Greek word skenos. In classical Greek, it denotes the advance
work often related to a major public event.
So it came to have a sacred-function meaning; and in Jesus' day, was a
nickname for how you 'prepared' for the sabbath; especially, the Passover sabbath.
Verse 11 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
o For
the Preparation is Christ [Matt. 27:62; Mk.
15:42; Lk. 23:54; Jn. 19:14, 31, 42] .
Preparation
for Life With God.
o Passover-eve
readiness; sabbath-eve readiness. Temple Bread prepared DAILY 'from sabbath
to sabbath', Lev 24:8, so there was a plan
to make it, bake it, present it fresh and hot. [Bread is a fragile nightmare; that's why flatbread became popular, and
noodles. Shewbread was raised, not
flat; Leviticus 23:9-21, hence 24:5-7
injunction. It must be grown, ground,
leavened just right. Takes all day, as
you WAIT for the yeast to raise the dough. Talmudic rabbis err to claim it
weekly flatbread; for it = THE LIVING
(warm) BOUGHT BY CHRIST. Just like
morning and evening offerings. You baked
it even on the SABBATH, when normally it wasn't legal to bake.]
o
Sacrifices and Bread and Light were
SET BEFORE (proetheto) in TEMPLE,
an Offering for FATHER to 'eat', as it were. Idea of Living for His Pleasure. So prothesin, Shewbread =
Nature, Spiritual Life of Christ-to-Come, how the 'smell' of His Thinking
Pleases Father, Isaiah 53:11; resulting,
in our own 'presentation' before Father.
Forever.
Third
clause, tou ta panta. Paul plays with that phrase, here: The
All Things: Him. The Everything.
So I added, 'Through Whom' to make that dual entendre, clearer. Christ is THE TEMPLE SHEWBREAD. We are to be made into Him. Get the pun?
[Check out the awesome Greek double-entendres
in these verses: Rom. 8:32; 11:36; 1 Co. 2:15; 8:6; 12:6, 19; 15:27f; Gal.
3:22; Eph. 1:10f, 23; 3:9; 4:10, 15; Phil. 3:8, 21; Col. 1:16f, 20; 3:8, 11; 1
Tim. 6:13. So I privately call Him Ta
Panta. Sometimes I forget myself in
videos and say Ta Panta, too!]
last 'bookend' in the eudokian portfolio
The
Delight of His Will and Purpose,
ten boulen tou thelematos autou:
Father ordains Church to Complete Time,
Make Her into the Very Glory of Christ
We
got a three-way anaphoric nest going on here; it all began back in verse 5, in
the '91' depicting Father's Eternity-Past Decree about Christ, updated with the
clauses Father ordained for Church. Because,
CHRIST is The Election: we are only elected IN Him, not of ourselves. [Maybe one day Calvinists will learn how to
read prepositions in Ephesians 1:4, etc. ]
Gist: The Good Will and
Pleasure of Father is to make us sons in Christ (verse 5), Who
is the 77th Son, dying at age 33; Who thereby became the Asset Portfolio we can
'eat', now that He is revealed (verse 9); as a
result of which we become Temple Shewbread and Firstfruits, like Him (verses 11+12). The
summed eudokian meter is 231
syllables = Daniel 9:24-27, God's Reply to Daniel. So this anaphora updates that reply
with God's Will and Purpose for Church, as 'inside' what God told Daniel: hence
the witty hidden-from-eternity-past musterion language of Pleromatos
Pregnant Time, a theme Paul loves repeating in Romans 8, Galatians 4, and
of course in Ephesians.
This
is the final eudokian anaphoric bookend.
Paul now completes his reference to Isaiah 53:11, LXX, which uses bouletai,
twice: first re Father, second re
Son. Paul ropes
both prior 'bookends' into one concatenated unity, here: Purpose Completed,
Isa54:1, and Chapter 55, fulfilled. [The anaphora began
with 3rd +4th clauses in v.5; next 'bookend' was 2nd +3rd clauses in v.9.]
The purpose of the eudokian
anaphora is to classify the 'paragraphs' of our ASSETS IN CHRIST. By using anaphora, especially in a nest, Paul vividly illustrates how
our assets are related to the other anaphora he nested in this
passage.
So
let's look at them. This eudokian anaphora is the first of three
sets of anaphoric constructions. It
starts first. The other two begin inside this
one; they both terminate, outside
it. BIRTH.
Meter of the eudokian 'nest', starting
at its verse 5, the 106th syllable: 28 + 14 + 28
+ 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7 + 12 = 215, but
1st 'pair' of bookends are between (years)
syllables 105 and 231 = 126, sum of 70+56, 18 sevens or 42
threes!
2nd 'pair', overlapping
between syllables 215 and 231, ending at 320, 15 sevens, 35 threes!
33 sevens! The Lord's Age
when He died!
Centered on, the middle 'bookend' in verse 9! Yeah, double-delight, of Father and Son!
77 threes! 70 x 7 x 3
fulfilled from first David to Last!
Same 231 syllables, as in Daniel 9:24-27! (See http://www.brainout.net/Dan924HebParsed.pdf)
Verse 11 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Assets in this nested triune anaphora are bulleted by
prepositional or articular 'heralds': Asset
'paragraphs' of Sonship. Greek asset titles are shaded:
εἰς ἔπαινον
δόξης τῆς
χάριτος αὐτοῦ 133
ἐν ᾧ ἔχομεν τὴν
ἀπολύτρωσιν 157
δια ... τὴν
ἄφεσιν
τῶν
παραπτωμάτων 175
ἐν πάσῃ
σοφίᾳ καὶ
φρονήσει 205
γνωρίσας
ἡμῖν τὸ
μυστήριον 215
ἣν προέθετο
ἐν αὐτῷ 238
εἰς οἰκονομίαν
τοῦ
πληρώματος
τῶν καιρῶν 252
ἐν ᾧ καὶ ἐκληρώθημεν
291 προορισθέντες
κατὰ πρόθεσιν 301
1. First Asset Class, v.6's eis
epainon doxzes tes charitos autou. So
the SONSHIP (second clause verse 5, which
kicks off the epainon anaphora) .. is
to Glorify the Son.
The Trinity epainon
(see Outline) begins another, nested anaphora benchmarked in v.6; next, in first clause in v.12;
finally, in last (hushed
drama?)
clause in v.14, by the Spirit Who does it all. So this is a nest within a nest, overlapping again, in the middle! Meter of epainon anaphora:
334-133, 67
threes; 434-320, 38 threes, = 105 threes or 45 sevens, = syllables in Daniel 9:14 through 19. (See Note F in http://www.brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF.) The 38
threes also = God's Meter in Daniel
9:25-26.
Now the plot thickens. 105
threes = Daniel 9:14-19, WITH an elided 7; OR 365
syllables, WITH elided 57. Alone, it runs 308
syllables. So Paul's epainon
'replies' to Daniel 9:14-19 on all three levels: this
life is like an Ark. Pregnancy.
o
Eph1:6 starts the epainon; to
translate it 'praise of His Glory', is fuzzy. Phrase means His
Glory is REFLECTED IN whatever or whomever IS that praise. An
angel is glorious by nature: reflecting, Angel of the Lord. But we are
to be Higher than angels, Hebrews 2. Like Him, 1John2:26-3:2, Eph4:13. Sea of glass, Rev 4
and 1Cor13:12.
o
In Eph1:12, the
next epainon use, we learn that 'praise', is US. Meaning, we will REFLECT CHRIST (prior
bullet).
o
In Eph1:14 the epainon
anaphora completes, and we learn the Holy Spirit makes us INTO
His Glory. THE Glory. Shekinah Glory, 10th
priestly course name, 2nd week of Chislev, which in some years = the Lord's
Birthday on Chanukah aka Christmas (especially since Pope Gregory cut 10 days out of the
Julian calendar).
o
Now tie back to Daniel and Temple. He prayed Temple be rebuilt. It was. But Temple=Christ was Rejected
when He came, Man of Sorrows still By His Hand Succeeding at the Cross,
paying for l'rabbim, the people. So would the Temple Get His Promised Time,
or would Time END? 62nd week
hadn't yet completed!
o
Enter, Church. Paul's metrical theme is 4
'quarters' of 91 each: # of sabbatical years in 490 + # of Jubilees in 1050, inter
alia. Sets up
2-walls analogy in Eph2. [See
p.15 of http://www.brainout.net/TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc.] Thus Paul ties epainon
to Daniel at 365 syllables, by leaving 50 (rather
than 57) in ellipsis, for Harvesting the Gentiles. Ties
to, Flood's 'Year'. Precedence: 57 days after his birthday, God told
Noah to leave, Gen 8:13-14.
o
Next, with a 7 ellipsis,
Daniel 9:14-19 = 315
syllables = the epainon, with no ellipsis. Idea: Church is PREGNANT with the Tribulation owed
the Jews. Again, idea that if Church doesn't give birth to Time's completion
(Romans 8:11ff, Eph1:10, Hebrews 11:39-40, Gal4:4, 19), Time will ABORT. Scholars know Paul loves pregnancy
analogies; this is another one, via
meter.
o
Finally, sans ellipsis, Dan9:14-19
runs 308 syllables, # days Noah was in Ark until age 601 (LXX
text, not Hebrew). Equals the epainon WITH 7 in
ellipsis (315-7). Church is not in
the Trib, see. And the 7
syllables @301-308 in Eph 1:11, textually tie to Rom 8:28,
another pregnancy chapter: God working all things together. So we LEAVE the Ark (Rapture,
end Romans 8) so Trib can be delivered. Typical Bible wit; here, in the meter!
So just
as Daniel's prayer completed Time so Church could be born from He Who Had No Descendants, Church Bride
Body of Christ will complete its 'Year' so that Israel can be reborn in Ezekiel
37, at the Second Advent. (Nerd
note: Ezekiel 37 graphically depicts
resurrection of the PEOPLE of Israel, including all OT believers . So it
never refers to a current political entity.)
Verse 11 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
2. Second Asset Class, v.7's ten apolutrwsin, a continuing thing, not merely salvation: see verse 7's note on apolutrwsin.
3. Third Asset Class, v.7's ten aphesin, so you CAN name your sins to God. No more animals, 2Peter 1:9 (in Greek, translators forgot to translate labwn, lol); Hebrews 10. Idea? Forgiveness
In Time --so you can GROW UP
spiritually, not merely be saved as a newborn -- is FUNDED. See verse 7's Note on aphesin.
4. Fourth Asset Class, v.8's sophia kai phronesei. (No articles, so hyphenated, hendiadys). See verse 8's Note.
5.
Fifth Asset Class, v.9's to musterion. See Verse 9's Note.
The
'eat', Temple Shewbread, and Firstfruits are themselves a third anaphora, a
Temple Trio of proetheto (v.9), prothesin (here in v.11, covered in the Second
Clause, above); and proelpikotas (v.12). Proetheto begins just
after the second eudokian clause ended. So we begin its 'count', at
syllable 231.
o
From proetheto to prothesin, 301-231 = 70 syllables. Voting!
o
From prothesin to proelpikotas, 343-301, 42 syllables. Generation Building!
o Note how text matches the meter meaning.
Sum is 112 = 56 x 2,
aka 16 sevens. [Isaiah paired 56's in Isaiah
53:1+2, 5+6 to cover Manasseh and Temple
Down, see 2Kings 24; Daniel
tracks Isaiah's chronology, so paired 58's (to stress lateness), Dan9:11+12 (on
time of Manasseh, reason for Temple Down). God paired 57's to show timeline of 2nd
Temple going down, Dan9:25+26. So
Paul uses paired 56's! Of course that
means Church will go down, too. But at
that point, it will still be completed, DUE TO the proelpikotas being
completed!]
o So the
Trio 'replies' to Daniel 9:25+26 = 114
syllables, since your 57th year begins piggybacked on your 56th birthday: Time
won't complete to Millennium if Church isn't made into Shewbread from THE
Shewbread, as that's the Plan. This
is the point of Paul's meter, why he first datelines with 56 and why verses 3
through 14 sum at 434 syllables, same as Daniel 9:4-13.
o Continuity
of Vote Critical. And, that Church Vote will always be
short. Hence the few, the proelpikotas,
will be what completes Church. The bulk
of Christians will quit the spiritual life, just as Israel quit hers. History
has sure borne that out. We thump Bible,
and never learn it. Not in the first
century, nor in this one.
o Flipside: Your
Vote Counts. Just like
Noah's. Vote well, the world
depends on it. Just like for
Noah.
Hence Isaiah 53:10 realized, end verse 14: due to Him, we are birthed; we thus become prothesin; so, we are proelpikotas, ourselves made
an ASSET IN CHRIST, birthed by the Holy Spirit.
The next two asset classes are related to the Angelic Conflict,
wrapping up all history.
6. Sixth Asset Class, v.10's eis oikonomian. See verse 10's note. God's Good Pleasure was to stick Church in
the middle of Daniel 9:26 (62nd week, Paul's metrical theme) so to complete the
Estate Management of Time (Eph1:10's text, which is in the middle of the 2nd
and 3rd eudokian clause -- the last one substitutes boulen, else
same thelematos autou). No
wonder it's 14 syllables, and stands alone!
7.
Seventh Asset Class, v.11's en oi kai
eklerothemen.. prothesin -- nota bene, context is the TRIAL WRAP UP,
not just a salvation inheritance! Then
comes the close of this nest, concatenated as kata
ten boulen tou thelematos autou. Paul switches to boulen, to tie in
the eternity-past contract between Father and Son, Isaiah 53:10. Thus wrapping up, All Time.
At which point, we
become an asset OF Christ, proelpikotas, verse 12. So now you know why
verse 12 only has two clauses, both of which are bookends: the final, unbelievably dramatic epainon
of His Very Own Glory; and hence, proelpikotas: first
in line, first in time, witnesses of Him.. in the Trial.
Notice this reverse order:
Daniel 9:4-13 is 'answered' by Temple Trio.
Daniel 9:14-19 is 'answered' by the epainon anaphora,
Daniel 9:24-27 is 'answered' by the eudokian anaphora.
Verse
Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
First
Clause: This is the second
'bookend' in the epainon anaphora.
First bookend in first clause of
v.6, was eis epainon doxzes tes charitos autou.
Now, the text is:
eis to einai hemas eis epainon doxzes autou.
Now, if you said
'Give me Christ or give me death', you replaced 'liberty' with Christ; you would make someone smile, if they knew
the original Patrick Henry quote. Paul
makes this same 'substitution' (to make a witty and important point). The bolded words (tes charitos) are substituted, exchanged, with
eis to einai hemas. The
exchange denotes how the replaced words are fulfilled. By what God does TO us. Notice carefully
that Paul FRONTS the epainon phrase, this time. That sets you up for proelpikotas, in
the second clause!
This expression is
very strong, as there's no 'tes' fronting 'doxzes'. It means Divine-Level Glory. Same as God's Own. It literally says we
are being made into His OWN Glory.
Christ's. Totally
shocking. We first met this anaphora
back in verse 6, so you might want to review the
Note there, as well as the above link.
Next stop will be verse 14.
First
in Line, First in Time, Last is First,
proelpikotas
the final keyword in our third nested
anaphora, TempleTrio.
Second
Clause: this is the final and climactic bookend in the Temple
Trio anaphora. Greek proelpikotas is a distinct reference to
FirstFruits. Sum of preposition 'pro', meaning before, early, prior, first; + 'elpikotas', from 'elpizw', meaning to hope.
So it
comes to mean the first group to believe in Christ post-Incarnation and Cross;
but the larger wordplay is on those who advance to the front lines in this
Angelic Trial. Root idea here is that some crops mature
early. So, they are 'first', but of
course maturation can rot, too. So
'first' doesn't have our sin-nature preening baggage, in it. True, some of us are more mature, or mature
earlier or more than others. But ALL the
crop is to be harvested, and anyone can rot quickly. Just do a bit of vegetable gardening, and
you'll know that fact, well.
The first 'crop' has smaller mature fruits, too. So the first crop of itself, isn't
valuable for itself, but for what comes AFTER itself; and that's Paul's
stress, in verse 14. So he knew the Rapture wasn't gonna happen
soon. Could and should, but people
wouldn't finish the course. God said, you
dedicate the first year's crops, to Him.
Thus they grow much bigger, year aka generation, five and six. [Compare Lev 19:23-25,
25:3-4, 21-22. Verse 19:24 uses ainetos,
cognate of ainos, from which comes epainos.] In other words, YOU DON'T WORK. God does.
You study. HE makes the fruit. Then the harvest is BIGGER than if you
tilled the soil, yourself.
So proelpikotas
is First In Time, First in Line
-- but at the end, not necessarily better: though the first, thus had more
privilege and responsibility. The
generation which saw Him in the Flesh has more blame, if it says 'no' to Him. The believer who advances to the front lines
has more responsibility if he fails, than the spiritual brats still wailing
behind with the combat-baggage train.
Proelpikotas is the third Temple keyword
Paul uses, articular participle. First
was proetheto, verse 9's note; then,
prothesin, verse
11's note. Paul
uses them like bookends. See the flow, how
Isaiah 53:12 gets done:
o
Spiritual
Assets set forth like a Meal from Christ (proetheto)
o
which
constitute God's Temple Shewbread Plan (prothesin),
o resulting in us as Firstfruits (proelpikotas).
Verse 12 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
Hebrew Firstfruits is
usually misunderstood. Harvest time
began on Firstfruits (Deut
16:9),
so your first handful of harvest was waved before the Lord as an
acknowledgement, to commemorate entry into the Land of Promise, Lev
23:9-21. It was also tax time, so you
gathered your harvest, paid your taxes; on the 50th day following (counting from LAST
day of Passover, not the first one, Numbers 28:26, Exo 23:16), you'd enjoy a day
off, on God (Leviticus
23:15).
This harvest celebration reminded Israel of Messiah's Advent.. the Second Time,
after Harvesting the Gentiles (converting them to Judaism).
So now we Church, living in the
shoulda-woulda-coulda 50-year period during which we were supposed
to become Jews (the
gap period in Daniel 9:26) -- we are instead the Harvesters;
Jews alive and believing in Christ between Pentecost 30AD and Rapture, become
part of us. Returning the Favor, for
if the Jews hadn't rejected Christ, you and I would never exist! That's Paul's analogy, playing on Romans
9-11. I wrote about that irony at
length, here: http://www.brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#Sum.
The Romans of Paul's
day were notoriously anti-semitic. So
when Paul pens Romans, he chides them for it, sotto-voce. First he sets up the value of the Law versus
the goyim, to get the Jews nodding at how bad the goyim were;
then
(Romans
2)
he
accuses the legalists (Jews) of not realizing the purpose of the Law, to
See Christ. Then he turns on the goyim
who prided themselves on replacing the Jews. (Beginning in Romans 9. Replacement Theology
has a pre-Catholic origin, in Rome.) All
the while, Paul advances our Position in Christ, versus our position in the
Law, or our position without the Law.
Very deft weaving. [Took my pastor four
years to exegete and teach Romans, daily.]
So Paul takes advantage
of their knowledge
back then (which we don't have now), of the Scheduled Millennium due
under the Law, predicted ever since Psalm 90,
o
circa
'our' 94AD.
o
Okay,
then 1000 years later, it ENDS.
o
Next,
tack on the final Jubilee, 50 years, and you have
o
ALL
TIME ENDING in 1144AD.
Um, it's now
2011. We shouldn't be here. Yet we have the same
preening problem as Israel's when she displaced the goyim, prompting
Moses to warn them in Deuteronomy 6, 9, 30 (passim): don't get fat-headed
just because you displace people in the Land God gave you. He will displace YOU just as fast. Paul too warns, threaded in Romans 9-11: God will not abandon the Jews. It's God's Promise, so God will keep it. Don't get fat-headed since you got grafted
in.
So of course when the
Rapture didn't occur by 94 AD, Christians became
disgruntled, having never paid attention to what Paul meant, here: church
must mature first. So, we
didn't. So, we've been fat-headed for
2000 years; our anti-semitic, preterist and replacement theology taught and
believed, by 90% of Christendom. No
wonder the Rapture hasn't happened, yet.
No one who believes
an anti-semitic doctrine, ever matures.
Even if he doesn't think of himself as anti-semitic. So all those 'Church Fathers' and Calvinists
never grew up. They made good peasants,
sometimes. But they never learned to
Think like Christ, since they rejected the very Promise To Christ that is
Jewish. So, in effect they lived their
lives rejecting Him, and fancied that they honored Him. Surely they meant well. But sincerity can't
buy a cup of coffee. Only Divine Money,
can buy divine maturation. And any
doctrine against the Jews, is never Divine.
Even
so, we are to be the FirstFruits graft through which a Harvested Israel gets
in, during Church. It's the Wifely thing
to do.
Verse
Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
First Clause: xxx
Second Clause: xxx
Third Clause: xxx
Fourth
Clause: xxx
Fifth
Clause: xxx
Sixth
Clause: xxx
Verse Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
First Clause: xxx
Second Clause: xxx
Third Clause: eis is a preposition of destination. So you are 'going' somewhere,
legally. INTO Redemption. In other words, you have a legal status
that at the moment, is not realized.
This is like getting a notice that you were bequeathed a huge
parcel of extremely valuable foreign real estate, but you haven't yet
traveled to it, to register the property.
It's yours, you can't lose it, no one else can get it, either; but you've not yet gone there. So Redemption is something you have, but it's
in the Universal Bank of Heaven, and you have to die before you collect ALL
that money.
So that's why the First Clause said 'ho estin
arrabon': you get a downpayment on
that account while living yet in this body, and the Spirit is that Surety. Real assets you really live on, and all your
life is based on what you are in christ. But, not all the wealth is useable
immediately. That's the point.
So Greek eis comes to mean purpose or result,
cause or effect. Sometimes in
Scripture, instead of the typical en tou kuriou, or epi ton kurion,
it says eis ton kurion -- the latter construction stresses an
end-of-the-journey, destination-of-life, meaning. It stresses even more, your position in
Christ as a result: shorthand for
eternal security.
[That's the meaning here: if you
are PUT into 'Christ', how can you get out?
You didn't put yourself into Him, did you? So how can you get out? Can you fly up to heaven -- assuming you
could even FIND it -- then find your 'location' in Christ, in order to leave
it? See how nifty a preposition, eis
is? INTO
but no OUT OF. You not only
didn't put yourself 'into Christ'.. you can't even find His location, and you
sure as heck can't GO there!]
When chained, eis denotes the relationship
between purpose and result, cause and effect. So here it should be translated 'resulting from', not
'into'. But I lacked meter 'space'. Paul frequently uses eis chaining to
track results FROM something then
resulting IN something, as in Romans 10:10. [See the last 3 of
my Romans 10:10 'eis chaining' videos in Youtube, which display eis chaining in the NT. Those videos show Romans 10:10 is misused by
Christendom to claim you must SAY ALOUD you believe in Christ to be saved. Au contraire, the first eis is
the CAUSE of your salvation, believing;
so as a RESULT, you SAY you believe.]
Eis chaining
is a major feature of this passage, the eis clauses divide his
meter. Sometimes
Paul chains eis clauses in reverse, but typically he does it
chronologically, as here. So, Resulting
FROM Christ paying, then resulting IN Spirit Glorifying Him, in this context. Double-entendre of the Spirit being Glorified
by means of Glorifying Christ. However,
verses 6, 12 and 14 stress the Glorification of Christ, first.
Really important to notice that, here.
Father isn't glorifying Christ to glorify Himself, but to answer John
17. Christ prayed that Father glorify
Him, since Christ wanted to glorify Father.
Spirit glorifies Christ. That
They are Each glorified Themselves as a consequence, is important juridically
(God should not be cheated), but it's of secondary interest to Them. Of Primary Interest, is the Other One: Father to Son, Son; Spirit to Son, Son. Son to Father, Father. Son to Spirit, Spirit.
Many denominations get tangled up over how to regard the Trinity. Bible stresses the Son. Because, Bible's ordained by FATHER, and SPIRIT runs it in
your head. So THEY focus on Christ. So we should also. Now, here's the irony: once you focus on
Christ, everything becomes 'for Father, or forget it.' Because, that's how He thinks. So, that's how you'll think.. eventually. [We humans
deem respect and worship by means of shallow observances, protocols, etc. But when you really love someone, you don't
think that way. The person is just
'there' in your mind, all the time:
First Commandment (smile here).
So that's true worship, John 4:23-24.
Then, any observances you adopt, become truly spiritual. Else, they are motions absent meaning, and
frankly become derogatory.]
Verse 14 Note, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
Fourth
Clause: xxx
Fifth
Clause: This is the
climactic last bookend in the epainon anaphora.
We saw back in verse 6,
eis epainon doxzes tes charitos
autou.
The
bold text exchanged in verse 12: eis to
einai hemas eis
epainon doxzes autou.
Now, here we see it
changed to
eis epainon tes doxzes
autou.
This third
exchange -- replacing eis to einai hemas in verse 12
with tes doxzes -- completes the definition of 'Glory'.
o Verse 6,
defined as 'Grace'.
o Verse 12,
exchanged with Us -- which obviously can
only happen as an Act of Divine Grace. So
o Verse 14,
The Holy Spirit makes us into THE = tes
Glory. As in, Shekinah
Glory. Which, the Holy Spirit was and
remains, Isaiah 63:10-14. Get the pun?
Kill me now.
PS: I have
to retranslate this clause to take into account the double-entendre mentioned
above. I don't know how best to do that,
yet.
End Notes
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
a
Paul also uses 10- and 11-syllable
clauses characteristic of classical Greek epic/heroic verse, so it was easy
to divide the clauses. I've not yet
analyzed further what Greek versification he uses. Like the later writer in Hebrews 11, Eph
1:3-14 is a mix of Hebrew meter and Greek epic style. LXX of Isaiah 53 employs
a similar style. So maybe the writer of
Hebrews, who frequently points back to this passage, chose to ape its meter in
Hebrews 11:1, since the passage here is also about voting as the Trial Matter that
completes Church (Eph 1:10). Whole books
of Ephesians and Hebrews are on the same topic, written about 10 years apart.
b
Participle. Can be translated as a finite verb. For eulogesas in verse 3, and gnorisas in verse 6, I chose a
hybrid translation, to show the
progressive stress of the participle.
Verbal aspect in Greek often gives rise to a different English translated
tense. Here, aorist in Greek gives rise
to present tense in English, for both pre-Time but also normative and
constantly occurring; compare with
present participle energountos in
verse 11, last clause; I translated it
as a simple present. Better to translate energountos
as progressive also, as Paul links by repeating the same form
of a verb, same preposition, etc;
but I didn't have enough meter 'space', in verse 11. Paul reminds the reader of Romans 8:28. Stresses that what was purposed pre-Time,
comes to pass and remain, IN Time.
See also Isaiah 55.
By contrast, proorisas in verse
5, an aorist participle, I translated as pluperfect. Participle heads (as here) often denote a
past action upon which a present state depends.
Idea of cause. A participle often
fronts a verse; but for stress might end
it. Here, since en agapei is an
enjambment, and given the fact it refers to God's Attribute of Love as well as
a moniker for Christ, the FOUNDING idea
inherent in proorisas would best be shown as a pluperfect, not a mere
perfect tense; especially, since the actual tense is aorist,
point-of-time-divorced-from-time; namely, eternity past.
c
'Enjambment': Attic rhetorical device that appends the beginning of the next line at the end of the
previous line of verse, to stress the appended word/phrase. Bible translators recognized it when they
assigned en agapei to the end of
verse 4; syntactically it begins verse 5. This piggybacking is a central
characteristic of Mosaic Law teaching that one thing begins backed on another's
end: stresses that things have interlinked purpose and consequences.
d Greek echw means To Grasp, so comes to mean Hold and therefore Have. It's a progressive idea. Something you keep on holding,
having, as your own possession, so you have the rights to USE it. So too, Greek apolutrwsin is
always progressive, idea of receiving payment made on your behalf. Redemption is first a price paid to God for
your salvation, by Christ. But after
that, what does Father do with the money?
He spends it on you to glorify Christ.
So Redemption is an
asset you USE, because Father made you yourself, an asset of Christ, the 'booty' clause in Isaiah 53:12.
See especially how Paul links apolutrwsin
in verses 7 and 14, to show these are PRIVILEGES to use post-salvation, due to
the fact that we ARE redeemed now, as a DOWNPAYMENT (arrabon, see
End Notes l and m). Eternal security, baby.
Yeah, but we're still down here. So notice: when you get an inheritance, you
don't necessarily get it all at once.
You might get some immediately, and the rest is conditioned upon certain
events. Example: a trust fund is set up
giving you $10,000 now, and if you're disabled, $20,000. Then, when certain other events occur, you
can draw on the funds. So that's what
our salvation is: certain funds are
upfront, money provided to USE, and in the event of certain contingencies, we
get other funds. One of these, concerns
the forgiveness of sins aka 'debt cancellation'.
Sin
is something you still do post-salvation, and it incurs a debt of punishment,
even though your sins were paid; for the child of God must be punished, to
grow into the use of his inheritance, theme of Hebrews 12:5ff. Okay, that money is on deposit via the Cross. But if
you don't use 1John1:9, you don't get the benefit of a) debt cancellation, and
b) the remedial 'cost' of repairing the damage done to your own soul by that
sin. My pastor spent
months explaining this, in his "Law of Double Punishment" series, how
not using 1John 1:9 "is worse than sin." Why?
Because you're refusing REPAIR by the Holy Spirit. So, you'll get worse, and maybe die like
Ananias (Acts 5), called 'the sin face to face with death', in 1John5:16. Hell sounds better!
So notice: redemption is
progressive. There's always some
loss to redeem, always some expense involved in growing, and Christ paid it all
IN ADVANCE. But it won't be used on you,
unless the right conditions apply, i.e., if you're in a state of sin the
spiritual assets stay locked away, since only the Holy Spirit can build you,
and He won't fill a defiled Temple (your soul, when in a state of sin). Hence the
need to use one of the other assets you have, the sine qua non of
spiritual growth, 1John1:9.
People
constantly tell me how smart I am. Well,
1John1:9 is the reason. My pastor harped
on it so much, I even use it in my dreams.
So we keep on having Christ's payment, in order to USE it. So, Yes You Name Your Sins To God Like John Did,
Like David Did, else the assets Christ PAID lie fallow, hidden under your
self-righteous 'napkin'!
End
Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
e Close to my
pastor's translation from L.293 of his '85 Ephesians, p.638 of Book B notes.
Greek oikonomia means estate management, or
someone with that office; pleroma is a culturally-loaded, Greek myth & drama term for a container (i.e., a ship, woman) filled up with things (or people).
Paul uses it as a moniker for Church, as 'Body' of Christ (wordplay on Bride and Pregnancy).
f Usually translated 'plan', Greek prothesin really means Temple shewbread: idea that you had to PLAN baking and presentation, as you'll see
explained in any lexicon (i.e., Thayer's, BDAG). So it should be translated more clearly as
'shewbread' so you know what kind of 'plan' is in view. For this is a
reference to Firstfruits Presentation, see Numbers
28, Lev23:15. Christ is Firstfruits,
we are part of Him: so it's God's Plan, to make us INTO Him. See Verse Notes 9, 11, and 12.
Greek prothesin is the key to understanding Ephesians' Two
Walls, and why Paul invokes Daniel 9's prayer, which Paul actually prays in response
to this doxology, Eph 1:15-23. My pastor
calls that 'the unfinished prayer', as it is open-ended (Temple=Body not
finished, pending Eph4:13's completion which triggers the Rapture); compared to, the per-individual
prayer in Eph 3:15-19, which he finished. Daniel was praying before he got an
answer. Paul is praying after the
answer. For The Answer To Daniel, Is
Christ; and Paul is After 'The Answer', Answered History.
g Greek musterion means information
known inside a group that is unknown outside of it. So the English word 'mystery' is an
unfortunate translation. God is not
mysterious. God's Will is not
mysterious. God's Word is not hard to
know, either. Bring your willingness to
learn. God will enable you to undergo
the discipline of learning. So: you
don't know Him or His Will -- and you MUST know, it's an imperative, Romans
12:1-3 -- you won't dokimazw His Will if you don't know His Word. [Romans 12:1-3 is
mistranslated. See http://www.brainout.net/Rom121-3.htm.]
Hence Paul's point here in v.9, God Makes Known. Thus
anyone piously calling God inscrutable, refuses to learn Him. Anyone who says 'His Mysterious Will', a
favorite phrase of John Calvin's --
well, God's Will IS a mystery to THEM, because THEY won't study
Him. They study their own self-righteous
appearance, their holy language, their pious behavior -- and of course the
behavior of others is picked apart.
Minutely. But they don't study
God. For as Paul says right here --
echoed in Hebrews 11:6, James1, many places -- God makes known -- but
not, to the self-righteous. To them, He
will always be inscrutable. They ASSume
knowing God, is arrogance. They imagine
they are holy if they call God too 'deep' to know. Really?
Then how can you obey Him?
And since Christ knew God better than anyone, guess what arrogance really
is?
h First occurrence of eudokian is
followed by a consonantal sound. The
second time, it's followed immediately and in the same clause, by autou. So in the latter instance, the ia
diphthong would be individually sounded, whereas the first time, it would be a
'yan' sound, in order to ready the mouth to pronounce the next consonant after
the n (tou). So elision occurs in
the first instance in verse 5, but not in the second instance, verse 9. The acute accent isn't really stress, but a
quick up-voice like the second tone in Mandarin Chinese.
K Wordplay: Spirit rebirths you, so you get a human
spirit, Titus 3:5, and are thus kaine
ktsis, 2Cor5:17. Notice how
it's a result of believing,
immediate. Notice also that 398 is almost
57 sevens. Paul returns to this theme in
Eph 5. 'Seal' in the ancient world: finger-ring
on hot wax 'sealed' a scroll attesting ownership of property listed on the
scroll, or commitment to whatever contractual obligations were in that scroll. Related: Revelation 4 Ownership of the World Scroll
Opening Ceremony
(see also
next note).
End Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
L 'Redemption of The Possession' is our
technical status. Christ is The Owner, not us. So due to the
Christ inheriting us, we 'share' in Him: only in that sense are we
'elected'. Hence Paul's continual
use of en and eis. In Him,
into Him, into a destination, resulting in an inheritance due TO being IN
Him. We are the Possession Of Christ, Isaiah 53:12; so His LEGACY to us, is His Own Spiritual Asset Portfolio, theme of Book of Hebrews.
[My pastor spent seven whopping years exegeting
Ephesians 7x per week, redoing the
exegesis of Chapter 1 three times during the first year he re-taught it (in
1985, starting with the "Protocol Plan of God" series, the segue
into 1985 Ephesians) -- to keep on
making this point about spiritual assets.
This is what distinguishes Church, and makes her covenant higher than
all the others before or after Church, he'd frequently say, when reminding
us of the lexeme in Eph 3:21. It was the
main theme of his teaching for those seven years, and he was so impressed by
Ephesians 1, he wanted to throw out all he taught prior. So he afterwards stressed the "portfolio
of invisible assets" for long as he
lived.]
So CHRIST ALONE is the Elected One, and "we share in all He is and has" as a
result. [Quote is my pastor's. I don't recall that he tied it to
Isaiah 53, but notice Greek verb merizw
in Isaiah 53:12 LXX (compare to yehalleq shalal in Hebrew). Paul uses this verb and its cognate noun meros to show we thus inherit Christ's
THINKING in Ephesians 4:16 and Romans 12:1-3.
I wrote webpages on both passages, Eph41216.htm and
Rom121-3.htm .]
Precedence: Israel was grafted in through David. We are grafted in through the Last David due
to His own Pre-Cross election of Church, Matt16:18, John 17, Romans 11. He is the seed,
Galatians 3:16, tying to Isaiah 53:10.
So we are never elected based on ourselves, but based on HIM. Calvin never grasped this, hence the weird
Calvinist definition of unconditional
election has plagued Christianity for centuries, Calvin removing both
free will and God's Foreknowledge; all this, just to remove any claim of merit. Ergo, Calvinism's lapsarianism is hopelessly
anthropocentric, convoluted; so you don't see the Primacy of Christ. Bible bluntly says no one BUT Christ was ever
elected, hence the NT catchphrase "in Him", here in Eph1: see Romans 6 and 8, how we are all
baptised into Him on the Cross, just as Isaiah 52:13-15, 53:10-11
promised. So yes, we are elected -- but In
In In In In .. Him.
M Because we are HIS
Possession, the Redemption money
(so to speak) gets spent on us. Notice
this spending glorifies Christ (verse 12).
So if you don't use your Redemption assets (i.e., you instead do works),
the money won't be spent on you, and the talent you instead hid away in a
napkin (not using Divine Assets but rather your own) -- will be given to
someone else at the 1Cor3 Bema.
N Greek article is masculine singular, and the
referent masculine singular is 'in Whom', clause ending at syllable 379. So 'Who' means Christ, but validated by
the Holy Spirit; the Agent in verses
13-14 changed. Notice the intertwined
equating:
o Verses 3-6, Father, ending with Father's Glorification which HE
accomplishes via Church (syllable 1-133);
o Verses 6-12, Christ, ending with Christ's Glorification which HE
accomplishes via Church (syllable 134-343);
o Verses 13-14, the Spirit, ending with Spirit's Glorification, which HE
accomplishes via Church (syllable 343-434, how clever).
The 91 for the Spirit does NOT factor
until '91', signifying that no voting counts
unless HE makes it work. So much for
man's idea that his own works count for anything!
Wordplay, again, on
the Inheritor becoming our
inheritance -- and hence the Earnest [Money] of it -- because we are in Him.
Further, Greek arrabon is also masculine singular, so
the article is also pointing forward, and arrabon
is anarthrous, so English 'THE' is used to signify it's Him, the First Fruits. (See also Rom8:23; 11:16; 1 Cor15:20, 23; 16:15;
2Thess2:13; 2Tim2:6; Jas1:18; 3:17; Rev14:4.
Book of Hebrews will stress FirstFruits
downpayment as Christ, Heb 6:20, 9:11-16, 10:9,14, 12:23 as a running
subtheme.) Cf 'the Lord is my portion' Ps16:5; 119:57; 142:5; Lam3:24. Paul's invoking these
well-established-in-Mosaic-Law definitions.
Meter Notes Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Meter deliberately
conveys symbolism to enhance one's doctrinal grasp of explicit text. Bible Hebrew Meter is crafted in a pattern
of sevens. The syllables of each
'paragraph' will be divisible by seven, and will be doctrinally significant.
Yet meter is also used
o
as
the author's dateline (when a
passage is written);
o
to
provide chronologies (i.e., of
Israel's past or future);
o
to
'tag' (cross-reference) another Bible passage of similar meter;
o
to
'tag' and then 'talk back to',
interpret a specific syllable location in the other passage(s).
o
'Tag' multiple passages at once in the SAME PLACE, so is a very deft
concordance mechanism.
o
We
know Bible writers do that with keywords.
We don't know they do that with METER.
o
So here, you'll get a taste of how Paul does it with
meter.
o
In
the Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc
link at the top of page 1, you have an extensive listing of how Daniel
did it in his prayer.
o
So
compare this document with that one's Footnote E (which runs over a dozen
pages), to see this rhetorical meter style
is rather well formulated, being as Paul lived in the first century AD,
but Daniel, 600 years prior.
o
Isaiah does the same thing in his Chapter 53
playing on Moses' Psalm 90, see my Psalm 90 Playlist: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?p=PLFF2856603C945631
.
o
Upshot: if these Bible 'stars' play thus with meter, there
must be hundreds of passages using it.
Detecting such passages would be invaluable to hermeneutics and textual
criticism.
o
And
it's not hard to do. Painstaking, maybe:
but even a brainout can do it. So what
follows will seem dry, a listing of tagged verses relative to the symbolic
numbers.
o
To see the 'tagging' function, compare same syllable or
metered 'paragraph' content of the verses listed
with the content in the parallel Ephesians verse. This document notes many examples, passim. The style is
antiphonal, witty and precise.
Very shocking.
Ready? Take a deep breath...
A 56
= central # (70-14) in Psalm 90 (v7-9, 9-10,13-15, 16-17) & Isa53 (v1-2,
5-6, sum of v.9 & 11).
o
56 is Paul's Anno Domini dateline, see verse 4's note. It's
really the Christ's 57th birthday, or just
before, after. (Your
birthday occurs when your old age has elapsed). [If Paul wrote just after
imprisonment in Jerusalem, 56 fits;
Tychicus could bring it later, the postscript
ending Ephesians, written then. See Roman Chronology
problems. Eventually, this note
will be replaced by a full reconciliation.]
o
Paul
picked that dateline also due to the pan-Bible significance of 56, to wit:
o
57
was the number of days Noah waited before entering and exiting the Ark (LXX's date-text,
which Paul uses here, see also http://www.brainout.net/FloodChronoREVISED.doc); so that became
precedence for the Mosaic Law.
o
So
57 is # of days from start of Passover
to Pentecost, see Num28:26.
o
Between them is 56. The between-ness is stressed, idea
that the final outcome CAN CHANGE. It
ain't over till it's over, Hebrews 4:6-10.
o
Same
# of days from Pentecost to 9th Av, per Bible's (not Judaism's) calendar.
o
Also
= missed sabbatical years from Rehoboam onward (49, not 70) + sabbatical years due ON them (7). Next page will cover this accounting in more
detail.
Ergo
Daniel waits until the start of the 49th year to pray, in Daniel 9. He records this in his meter. (V.4 is 49 syllables,
so 48 had elapsed. You're IN your
49th year, first day of it, on your 48th birthday.)
Meter Note A, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
o Ergo 49 (not 56) is refunded
in Daniel 9:25. 49 thus has dual
meaning Paul adroitly uses, from 2nd
clause in verse 10, to end verse 11 = 49 syllables. The double meaning? 49 years from Jubilee
to Jubilee,
which always meant Harvesting the Gentiles, End of History. But also, 49 is the # of
missed sabbatical years, signifies Israel's apostasy, Diaspora.
See, if Israel
obeyed her sabbatical years, that 49 wouldn't exist. But she didn't, so seven extra sabbatical
years were owed 'on' it, yet couldn't be paid. That led to '56', the meter of Warning
Bill Robinson, Trouble Ahead.
So how does the 49 or
even 56, become 70? For
a full accounting, see
http://www.brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a and #9 (p.15) in http://www.brainout.net/TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc . When you load the FAQ page, search on
"Master Accountant", for how
the 49, became 70. #9 in TenWays, explains the relationship between 70
and 50.
Root
concept: in the Mosaic Law, you have 'restitution' or
'redemption' as a doubling, a mirroring. To repay a negative, two positives are
needed. Israel incurred negative
time. She didn't use her years as
stipulated; she was to study during sabbatical years, that's
why she got whole years of vacation, while the goyim in other
countries, sweated.
But
the goyim in Israel, rested. So
you can just imagine how many of them, voted with their feet! For the command was for the Land and
everything on it, animals included, to rest every seventh year, and every
Jubilee year. You realize, of course,
that year 49 is a seventh, and after that Jubilee, so for TWO WHOPPING YEARS no
one did any work. Atop that, you could
only harvest maybe every three years, which required a miraculous preservation
of food.
See:
it was a blatant advertisement that Israel's God, was the Real One. Only God can keep the Land producing when
man does nothing, just like in the
Garden of Eden.
So to
keep working, in effect denied God's Provision:
a witness failure. So that failure, must
be made up. However, to make up time
requires more time, so more sabbatical years are due on the newly-elapsing
time, as well.
So
here, the 49 years do get made up, but not the seven extra years due on them.
So
the Tribulation, must occur. It
can't be made up during Israel's time, yet must be debited FROM her time. That's why Daniel 9:27 is after
Messiah, after the 50 years (in ellipsis) symbolized by Jubilee, the 'time' to Harvest
the Gentiles (elided
from Daniel 9 tally, not part of the Jewish 490). Ergo, Christ updated to 'times' (plural) of the Gentiles (Luke 21:24). For the 'time' of Church, now intervenes.
So
now notice: had there been no Church,
the 50th year would KICK OFF the Tribulation.
So the only difference WITH Church, is that the '50th year' is no
longer the deadline. Now,
as we'll see in Ephesians 4:13, the deadline becomes our Corporate Maturation. We can't even say how mature we each
are. How much less, can we say when
Church Corporate, fully reflects Christ's Own Maturation? It's impossible!
See: 'Rapture' is not a date, but a condition. Ripeness of the Firstfruits. So those trying to date the Rapture --
drooling over events that always reflect Daniel 9:26c time-bubble, Eph1:3-14
-- those date-setters are ignorant of
Bible. So, ignore them.
Now
do you get Paul's number pun, in verse 10? Look: he makes the first clause stand on its
own, as a 14. Then he uses perhaps the longest word in
Greek, requiring him to begin a new clause, to keep meter. He then makes that word 'head' a 49-syllable
paragraph! [Paul's big on making
'head' wordplay. Look at 1Cor12:31 in
Greek and laugh your head off as you read 1Cor13.]
So notice: the 49
links Jewish Diaspora to Harvesting the Gentiles, the juridical
impetus for Matt16:18 and hence, Church.
Is that clever, or what? That's
why the third '91' = 49 +7 + 35 (see Note E). The
metrical composition underscores his verse 10 text that via Church, TIME
WILL BE COMPLETED. That's what meter
is supposed to do: cadence adds meaning to words, to form a fitted whole. Look:
91 - 7, is Moses' 84 syllables (Note C, below).
Divine Decree. The '7', is the extra hanging-chad of the
Tribulation, as Israel had used UP her Time;
ergo, Messiah had to come first to RESTORE Time.
POINT: Church
completion 'buys' the juridical justification for the Tribulation to occur,
precisely because we ARE in Christ.
Hebrews 11:39-40 will stress that.
See: the
meter adds meaning to the text, and is part of it. So miss the meter, and you miss the meaning.
Meter
Notes, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse
3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14
B 77 = Hebrew syllables in Isa52:13-15,
Ps90:8-10, 10-13, 13-16; Luke 3, Christ
is 77th Son. 77 is also David's death
age, 1Kings 6:1 (but
'scholars' ignore it in favor of Josephus).
Isa53's total years (syllables) w/ ellipsis = 154 x 7 = 77 x 2 x 7; 252 years are elided between 52:15 & 53:1; 364, between 53:10 & 53:11. 252 = years between David's death & when Isaiah was called by God,
same meter as Isaiah 1:1. 364 = Temple standing time. Daniel tags both elisions in petition,
Dan9:15-19, ergo '62 weeks' is granted (364 reimbursed, +
Daniel 9:2 '70'). Daniel
balances at '490' just as Moses and Isaiah, yet Daniel won't use 77. Paul however does: see
verse 4's note and Pregnant Expectations
section, for the tallies.
C 84 = Hebrew syllables in
Psalm 90:1-4's Opening Decree; also sum of 90:4, 8, 9, 16, & 11-15. Isaiah 53 splits it, two 42-syllable sections as
bookends. Daniel does the same, in
Daniel 9:14 and 17. The bookend
function is designed to stress that all the words between the bookends, are
related directly to God's Decree.
Paul uses the 84 explicitly in the last clause of Eph 1:4, but nowhere
else. He parcels out the 84 as 21's,
instead, each 21 within a 91.
D 21 = Hebrew syllables in
Ps90:4, 8, 9, 16; Isa53:7 on Christ led to the slaughter (1st 21 syllables,
embedded).
Temple building.
E 28 = Hebrew syllables of
Isaiah 53:9, 11; Ps90:11-13 (palindrome). 133 is endpoint in Isa53:2 & Ps90:7. 175 is endpoint in
Ps90:9. Isaiah debited 28 syllables from
Chap. 53's syllable total, to show a shortfall in Israel's voting that only
could be fulfilled IN Christ. Paul's use
of 28 also plays on that. The 28 = 21 +
7, number of years en toto to build 2nd Temple, plus the 'hanging chad'
of 7, which became the Tribulation to 'reimburse' the Lord's then-upcoming,
Passion Week. That week being fulfilled
by the Lord, the Tribulation is now due next;
but it can't play until Church completes, Hebrews 11:39-40. Thus the 28 remains a shortfall, to be
fulfilled by Father FOR Christ, via Church (see Eph 1:15-23, esp. verse 23).
35 is a derivative of 28, one half of 70. Idea
that the voting during the 70 'buys time' for the
Harvesting of the Gentiles. So if the
vote is short (indicated by 28), the Gentiles won't be harvested, and Time won't complete. Notice how the extra seven signifies
completeness. Moses uses it in Psalm 90:
10 for the completeness of the Flood; in verse 17, as a prayer that the voting
will complete during what would become the 2nd Temple's and Jerusalem's
(re)construction. Isaiah used it in
Isaiah 53:3 and 4, showing that the vote 'completed' Temple downfall; but in Isaiah 52:15 and 53:10, the payment for
the goyim is paralleled as part of the total 'contract' between Father
and His Hands, the Son: again,
the idea of Completing Time. The Psalm
90 counterparts are only two: Psalm 90:10 and :17.
It's a running meter theme in Psalm
90, Isaiah 53 and here in Paul, Eph 1:12's last clause. Notice how Paul links believing in Christ,
with the Voting To Complete Time that 35 signifies. There's no way to show that, unless you METER
the translation! (35 is pointedly
missing from Daniel 9, since he's tallying up the indictment of Israel being
SHORT.)
F 63 = Hebrew syllables in Isa53:10-11 or 9-10, &
Ps90:1-3, 10-12, 14-16. Also = 147-84, Eph 1:5-6. 238 is endpoint in Ps90:12.
G 14 = Hebrew syllables in
Psalm 90:11: two Trib 7's of bad votes
against God. Also, 252 is an endpoint in
Psalm 90:13. 490 - (70-14) = 490 - 56 =
434 = Daniel 9:25's 62 weeks. Psalm 90,
Isa53, Dan9:25 and Eph1:3-14 all 'explain' that two Trib 7's have yet to play. Mene
mene tekel upharsin. It's THE reason
why Rapture is Pre-Trib: Israel didn't
finish her 'time' before going negative.
So '14' stands for an open, yet incomplete, Juridical Issue to be
resolved. Paul asserts in
Eph1:6's second and third clause, that it will be resolved to Glorify
Father. In verse 10, he asserts it will
wrap up history, and thus glorify Christ.
H Direct reference to Isaiah 53:10's bouletai (haphetz in Hebrew), repeated twice in LXX first for Father, then Son. This is the climactic third in another
meter-nested anaphora in verses 5, 9,
and 11. See their
Verse Notes, especially 11's.
I Verses
5, 6, 11 and 14, direct reference to Isaiah 53:12a, Christ INHERITS us.
These verses point with inheritance keywords, and are metered apart by groups
of seven. I don't yet know why. Text shows He inherits us, so we have
inheritance IN Him. So 'obtain' is a bad translation; klerow is aorist
passive, means to inherit by LOT: as a beneficiary class, or due to a law or
rule (i.e., someone's will, see Hebrews 9). HE is elected Heir, so we receive Election IN
Him. Bible says Only Christ Was Elected, i.e., 'in Christ' refrain in Ephesians
and passim; Isaiah 52:13 and 53:12, Colossians 1:16-18; so we are
elected only IN Him, Isa53:6, 10; we are
His booty, Isa53:12. You inherit a house.
So it 'inherits' your care, if you keep it.
Meter Note J Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go
to: End
Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant
Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
J
=Jesus = Joined is
Paul's Theme.
CHURCH BUYS
TIME: for Her KING OF KINGS, Sanctified
Time.
Hence Paul adroitly
employs a 91
meter: the sum of Israel's Sabbatical Voting years in a 560.
Their voting BOUGHT the 50-year 'goyim' voting period.*
Now
watch this: 91 x 4 equals what? 364!
And what's left over? 70, to equal Daniel 9:26's 434 aka 62 weeks!
And what's after
that? 56!
To complete
what? TIME, signified by 490!
And what is 56+91+56+91?
294, the Human Gestation Period, 280+ 14!
Meaning?
Pregnancy and Birth,
Paul's favorite theme
in all his epistles!
So Paul neatly apes Psalm 90's one-and-four by making the 70 (representing the
Millennium)
'enclose' the first paired 91's.
o
Those
first two 91's are Christ's Own
'Pregnancy',
Decreed in Eternity Past (verses
3-6);
then, Our Sins In Him in Time -- on the Cross (verses 7-9); we'll call that pair, Pregnancy
1.
o
The
second two 91's are Church Born and
Constructed to Bridge Time
(verses
10b-14). We'll call that pair,
Pregnancy 2.
Joining these two
Pregnancies is Verse 10, 14 syllables: the
summing-up-of-Trial-matters, Church as the Fullness-of-Times (lit.) Dispensation. Greek pleroma means 'fullness' in the
sense of a 'container' (ship, woman)
'filled up' with cargo. Divine Wit, for
Paul models Ephesians after Euripides' play Ion, long-famous to his
Greek audience as the story of their founding!
Let's examine Paul's four 91's, as 'the Year of
Church'. Four Dimensions of
a Building, too. This Time Bridge Role
has precedents: Noah in the Ark, the Exodus Plagues and First Temple Standing. For, they each had the same amount of time:
o
Noah was in the boat one year. But he comes out on the 365th day, so you can
rightly say that Noah was only IN
the boat for 364 days. (Paul uses LXX text
for the count, not BHS.)
o
Same
period as the Exodus plagues would last.
o
Same number
as the First Temple stood, 364 years.
o
Same
number of sevens, between Flood
and pre-Church Schedule of Millennium's start, minus the hiatus (presaging His Arrest,
Lamb Set Aside)
in the Flood account, Genesis 8:12. [364*7 = 2548, - 3 = 4200 - 1655 when Flood
began. 4200 and 1655 are Years from
Adam's Fall. The initial 57 dovetails
with the 54 'credit' which both Noah and Abraham 'earned' by maturing
early. So I have to do more
analysis. Meanwhile, see https://brainout.net/excelconverted/GeneYrs.htm
on timeline, http://www.brainout.net/FloodChronoREVISED.doc
, for Flood. Again, Paul uses LXX not
BHS, in Genesis 7-8. Recall that Day
begins piggybacked on the Evening of the Day Prior, so in math you must add or
subtract one.]
o
Noah voted during the 70-year
voting period from 1540-1610 from Adam's fall (ending 2496 bc). So, his 70 was reimbursed. (As part of Noah's Time covenant, the
490-year award which bought Time to Abraham, exactly.)
o
Moses voted during the 70-year
period ending 2660 from Adam's Fall (1446 bc); that's why there
could BE an Exodus.
o When Temple was rebuilt, its 70-year downtime (Daniel 9:2, Jeremiah 25:11) was reimbursed as
part of the 62 weeks that Daniel voted, via his own metered prayer. (Dan9:1-13's sum is 434 syllables. He asks
for Temple Return in v.16 = 62 syllables.)
So what do Noah, Exodus and Temple have in common, besides
the 364 number?
All Time Future Depended
On Their Successful Conclusion.
o
Noah 'carried' the whole human race in his
family, so to speak.
o Exodus 'carried'
the progenitor nation of Messiah, through Whom the whole human race would
derive not just eternal blessing, but the justification for even being born, on
earth (since Christ would pay for ALL sins);
o
Temple depicted that Messiah-to-Come, and if it weren't standing, Time Would
End. That's what Daniel 9 is all about.
o
So by analogy, the 'Year of Church' means All Time hinges on our
Completion, just as Hebrews 11:39-40 says. Our 'year' ends with the Rapture; so like Noah, Exodus, Temple (in reverse) -- the day of exit ends our 'year.'
Whenever that is.
*[Math proof is in page 15 of TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc
. Root
Precedence: 91 = believer voting period
(70) + number of 50's, in a 1050.]
Meter Note J, continued
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So now what's the relationship of the 70, to
the '364' of Church?
o
Notice
the Lord's age 56 (really His 57th birthday, end of the 56th
year) at the time Paul
writes, standing outside the 91's,
o
even as the pivotal Eph 1:10's 14 for the Summation of the Trial.
o
Sum? 70! The Lord VOTED, and as a result, we can. For we are the 'goyim' bought
by His Voting, get it?
Isaiah
53:10-11's m'amal naph'sho
Joining Application to Church
(Click here for Meter-map
doc links to Psalm 90 etc.
)
Pregnancy 1a, Ephesians
1:3-6,
Meter sum 147 = 21 sevens,
Temple Building for
Father
(first 'Glory' paragraph, see Outline.)
Meter Pattern for verses 3-6 = 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14
o The Lord being in with of God in eternity past, parallel to the Trinity statement in John 1, verse 3.
(Information John
wrote was long known prior. God had him
write it out, for posterity.)
o But as we saw in verse 4 (click here
for its Note), beginning with its second clause, a '91' is nested, with the result that there are 77 syllables through
the end of verse 6.
o So the palindromic pattern is: 56
+ 21 = 77, yet also 56 + (21
+ 7 + 21 + 28 = 77) + 14.
o Notice how between the 56 and the 14, is 77 syllables -- the 77th Son, at His own
hypothetical age 77, originally scheduled to die in the 1077th anniversary of
David's death at his own age 77! [See Note b on the 77 used in Moses, Isaiah, Daniel.]
o So the 77 palindrome 'hinges' at the first 21, the archetypal number of Temple Building, which itself is precedented on Jacob's years in Haran; and before that, Noah's Thrice-Sent Dove.
[See Note d on the 21 used in Moses, Isaiah, Daniel.]
o The number of 50's in a 1050, is 21. So '21' is also shorthand for a whole 1050 'house'
of Time.
o Even more evocative, 21 is the number of sabbatical years in the 50-year 'goyim' period that
Israel BOUGHT, by keeping her sabbatical years.
o So 21 also means Buying Time for unbelievers, To Vote. [Math proof is in page 15 of TenWaysThisTimelineDiffers.doc
.]
o
Double-77's
is a clever way to show He was in David and David in Him.
o The Pregnancy
Precedence, Isa53:11 -- He is in Father; the human race is in Him, The-Ark-The-Mercy-Seat-Depicted;
so humanity's
survival depends on how HE VOTES (the 56 'outside'
the 77, the 14 also 'outside' 77; 56 +
14 = 70, the standard voting period).
o Notice how verse 6 ends with a '14' clause. Contingency: maybe His Vote would complete, maybe
not. He was free to reject, just like
any human. [Theme of the later Hebrews 2 and last half of 4.]
o
Then, He being
birthed as Human (Heb 10:5), VOTED; hence PREPAID for Pregnancy 2, us as Body of Christ.
So now
let's examine why Paul
cross-references these meters.
o
The 56 (one-half = 28), is the most-stressed meter (see also End Notes
A and e).
Meaning? Vote Critical, Vote Crucial, Vote
that Continues or Stops, Time itself. The Lord is THE Reason for Time, Hebrews 1:2
in Greek. [English 'worlds' is a mistranslation, it should
read 'Ages', aka time, dispensations.] Since Ephesians 1:3-14 are on God's Design for Church, and
since that Design is to Make Church For
Christ, Our Voting is as Critical to Time Continuing, as His was. The Body Has The Same Job, As Its Head. Paul already introduced The Head
in 1Cor12:31, with 1Cor13 a witty way to explain what's in HIS Head, should
be in ours via Canon Completion, Paul's theme for the book since 1Cor1:5 (again, in Greek; it's mistranslated).
Meter Note J
Pregnancy 1, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
o
Daniel 9 uses the 56
inversely, by omission (ellipsis), except in Dan 9:9-10. His total is 57 in that verse pair.
Meter period covers the bad phase
of Asa (who had a good run, prior) through Joash, the latter being the guy who ordered Zechariah killed (son of high priest Jehoaida, who RAISED Joash). All of them started out well,
but ended badly; so they flunked 57, got 56'd, mene mene tekel upharsin (57 days from Passover to Pentecost; 56 days between Pentecost and 9th
Av).
Whoops. [Paul sets up his own vote with
verses 3-14 as background; in verses
15-23, Paul votes the model prayer we should also pray; thus he plays on Daniel's prayer content,
to show the import of Church Voting.]
Idea that Israel's shortfall is now history, hence Daniel prays;
so '56' is left to bosheth silence. So, he talks around 56, but
not on 56. Example: Dan9:1-13's
syllables total 434 = 490-56, aka '62 weeks'; Daniel 9:16 uses 62 syllables, for the
same reason: verse content asks God to
restore the Temple and Israel. So God
also responds in meter and explicitly, with '62'. (In translation, the 62 'comes from nowhere'.)
Daniel also uses 49 as a stand-in for 56 (see also End Note A), in Dan9:4, 13 as bookended datelines, with '49' as
the Year-from-Temple-Down, when he prays; then, after he ends a metrical
round-robin history of Israel's kings, he stops at 607 bc when he was taken hostage, Dan9:14, his Time Track 2. Yet in his Time Track 3, he tagged his syllables' difference-between-sevened-paragraphs,
to Isaiah 53's kings' chronology, then comes back to the date he
prays, in Daniel 9:13. Syllable
count? 434! Thus
Daniel admits Isaiah's prophecy on that future history, came to pass. How Daniel 9 and Isaiah 53 further relate,
follows below under Isaiah's 56 meter usage. [Footnote E of http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc
has a full accounting of Daniel's meter with matching Kings and Chronicles
passages.]
Daniel also uses 49, as he knows the seven extra sabbatical years will elapse ON the 49,
while the Temple is Down. (See also End Note A.) That extra
seven cannot be made up during Israel's time;
so, Daniel's prayer ends 56 years short of the entire Divine Plan of Time, his third 'silent'
use of the 56.
o
Psalm 90 uses the 56 meter in its own verses 7 through 9 (sum is 57, but
recall that your 57th year begins on your 56th birthday). Also, the 56 is in verses 9+10, 13 through 15, 16+17.
So Moses piggybacks verse 9, mirrors 9+10 with 16+17. He nests 13 through 15. All the same doctrinal meaning, voting crisis or voting
crucial: 56 is the
upcoming, prophetical shortfall (49+7, years owed due to Temple Down).
· In my Psalm 90 videos (http://www.youtube.com/playlist?p=PLFF2856603C945631), I went though Moses' meter structure. 84, the Decree
containing the Millennium; 70, the Adamic 1050, verses 5-8; 70, the Noahic 1050, verses 9-11; 70, the Mosaic 1050, verses 12-15, with
Moses writing autobiographically of his own vote during that 70. Finally, the 56 in verses 16+17, a then-future 1050 for Israel -- relative to the Flood;
for Moses pens Psalm 90 in the 1050th anniversary of the Flood -- to parallel the Coming of Messiah at its end (and He did come then). [Nerd note: Moses writes 1400bc, the 1050th anniversary of the
Flood. His meter totals 350 syllables =
350 years, which will become 'our' 1050 bc,
once that 'future calendar' completed.
At that point, Messiah was to arrive/be born 1050 years later. We moderns won't exactly tally to that number
owing to calendar problems cutting out 3 years when we converted to BC/AD
accounting, based on Rome's. See Roman Chronology
problems. Three extra years
inserted offset by 3 years excluded, is self-canceling: so some dates
coincide.]
· All these periods demand, VOTE FOR GOD: else
Time Ends. Accordingly,
Daniel Votes for the '490' to be Restored; its prophetical
use is secondary; for its prophecy was long set in Psalm 90, and Mosaic Law.
Instead, Dan 9 is about
Justice ACCOUNTING. For Time is Loaned in units of 490+70+790=1050; with the 70 as the Mass
Believer Voting Period, ever since Adam's fall.
That 70 came EARLY, due to Temple
Down. So that's
why Daniel Votes. Him, Jeremiah,
Ezekiel, a few others.. their votes, SAVED TIME.
·
Next Psalm 90
item: Moses creates a 56
piggybacking two Voting Periods in two 1050 units;
Psalm 90:8 belongs to the Adamic 1050, but verse 9, to the Noahic. Get the point? Noah wouldn't have existed to vote, had those before him, not voted for God.
· See why the 56 is piggybacked? So Psalm 90:9+10 exist because
verses 7 through 9 existed first; so then
verses 16+17 will exist -- 467-397 bc, the then-future scheduled
70-year Voting Window -- because verses 13 through 15 (Mosaic period) existed. Clever, huh.
Meter Note J Pregnancy
1, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
· So then the FUTURE of Psalm 90:16+17 will NOT
exist, if Israel Doesn't Complete Her Vote. That's Why Daniel Votes, 70 years before the
voting period depicted by Psalm 90:16-17, begins. Why Daniel metrically records
his vote tying back to Psalm 90, in Daniel 9:5.
[Second dateline use of meter -- verse 4 was 49 syllables, meter dateline of Years-From-Temple Down, syllable 252 in Isaiah 53's
meter, covered below. So Dan9:5's second dateline, is a cumulative
meter of 73 sevens = 511 years prior to 538 bc, = 1050 BC, where Moses left off, in Psalm 90:17. Notice that the sum 538 + 511 = 1049, tells
you Daniel prays at or near the START of 538BC.
Which we know, since Cyrus conquered Babylon at the end of 539BC (10-11
Marchesvan, per ISBE). Daniel also makes
another dateline emphasizing he's 70 years from the absolute historical (official) next voting window, by using 69 as his meter in
Dan9:18. (Again, remember an anniversary
is 1 less than the beginning of the new year.)
He actually closes his prayer with two datelines, just as he opened his
prayer with two. Second ending dateline:
Daniel's prayer total syllables are 742; 742 sevens, is 5194; all history was to last 5250 years, per Psalm
90; so Daniel closes on the pregnant 56 (5250-5194=56), and THAT is why Paul opens
AND closes with a 56, as well. Awesome stuff, when you realize Daniel and
also Paul, merely talk out loud. This
tells you how far God can develop one's thinking, far exceeding our
limitations!]
· Next, why Psalm 90:13-15, are nested. This period covers Moses' own vote, the 70-year Voting Window ending
1446 bc, six years pre-Exodus [row 83 in http://www.brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls]. The nesting stresses how his
vote bought Time (which God stressed as entirely due to moses, Numbers 14:12 and Exodus 32:10). So Moses metrically shows how he
himself could not have voted, and thus Israel could not have existed, had Noah not voted (i.e., Genesis 6:8).
o
Isaiah 53 thus uses the 56, to continue the
same stress as Moses,
in effect elaborating on the 56 cliffhanger at the end of Psalm
90:16+17. That's where Isaiah picks up
his Time Accounting.
§
So Isaiah 53 mirrors 56-syllable
'paragraphs'
in Isaiah 53:1+2, 5+6 and 9+11. Moses
had used four 56's, but Isaiah only uses three.
Why? Because time has elapsed.
Here, we must review Isaiah's
structure for Chapter 53.
§
42 sevens (294 years) after Moses ended
Psalm 90, and 42 years after Azariah (aka Uzziah, to
distinguish him from the high priest of the same name) began his reign,
Isaiah is called by God (same
meter as in Isaiah 1:1). So he begins Chapter 53 (52:13-14 in Hebrew) with that dateline
paragraph.
§
Isaiah's metered chronology, though, picks up
where Moses leaves off, when human kings begin due to Israel rejecting
God (1050
bc);
§ So Isaiah starts
at David's birth (1040
bc, skipping Saul), as his meter theme
is First David to Last David, running sotto-voce
beneath and related to, the actual text.
[Daniel
will do the same, but he begins at David's Hebron Kingship, in Dan9:6, first time he mentions 'rulers' (m'lakeynu).]
§
Isaiah thus structures Chapter 53 to run 1078 syllables = the
1077th anniversary of David's death = scheduled death of Messiah,
at the end of Chapter 53. For Messiah must die no later than the 1000th
anniversary of David's death, or Time Must End.
This balances to Moses' Psalm 90 structure of 5250 years Allotted for History, assuming Israel accepted
Christ when He came. Its last 57 years
were represented by Jubilee and Tribulation;
by Passover plus Pentecost, and David had been dead 1000 years
(maybe to the day) when 4200 - 57 would occur.
§
In Isaiah 53, there are two periods in ellipsis:
·
252 years between Isaiah 52:15 and 53:1, where
Isaiah begins to track to Hezekiah et seq., going into the present and future.
·
Second
ellipsis is 364
years between Isa53:10 and 53:11, to promise refund of 1st Temple Time.
§ For Isaiah writes
Chapter 53, 126
years prior to the Temple's fall, at which point the Temple will be SHORT
126 years of its own 490-year Time Grant. [Hence Daniel 9:2 +v.25, tally 70+49+7; the
62 weeks is new time, in response to Daniel's 434-syllable and 62-syllable
request, in Daniel 9:1-13, plus verse 16.]
Meter Note J
Pregnancy 1, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
§
So Isaiah's 56's are three, to
represent three SHORTFALLS in voting, all of them then-future:
· First shortfall,
Manasseh's,
born 14 years after Isaiah datelines Isaiah 53:1. Daniel will tie to this '56' by pregnantly using
a 58
in his metered chronology, at Daniel 9:12 (end of the verse). He uses 58, because
Manasseh did finally come to love the Lord, but late (2Chron33:13, 2Kings
23:6, 24:3). Too late, for God's Vote to Destroy the
Temple and Jerusalem, to be rescinded.
You've just got to
see Daniel's number wit, here:
·
57
days from Passover beginning to Pentecost;
·
57
days from Pentecost to 9th Av, which will become the day the Temple goes down,
TWICE;
·
56
days, between each of those dates.
·
57
years before the End of Time when Millennium was to begin, Messiah was
scheduled to die.
·
That
was represented by Jubilee and Jacob's Trouble,
·
by
Passover and Pentecost, and initially,
·
by the number of days Noah was over his birthday, when he both
entered AND exited, the Ark (Genesis 7:11 in LXX and 8:14, respectively). Notice the parallels? The precedents?
·
So
'58', shows Manasseh's repentance was too
late to stop Temple downfall.
Deadline signified by the '56' in Isaiah 53:1-2, was missed.
Just as Isaiah predicted it would be.
2Kings 21:11-15
records God's Vote, due
to Manasseh's negativity and hence Israel's (for kings always symbolize their people's
attitudes): as per the 1Kings 9 contract with Solomon
when the Temple was dedicated, it and Jerusalem, Will Go Down. So Daniel invokes that Vote, when
praying Dan9:13 and 16. (Daniel's
meter date at verse 13's beginning is Manasseh's birth, representing his
life. See 2 Chron 33 for a more detailed
account. Notice how Manasseh's reign is
also short of 56. Ouch.)
· 2nd shortfall, Temple
Down,
1Kings 9 contract for its restoration;
so Daniel prays at the start of the last missed sabbatical year,
syllable 252
in Isaiah 53. [712
- (252-77) =538. Beginning of 538, so
537 in the math. See also End Note G.] Dan9:13 tags Isaiah via summed meter
differences between the sevened paragraphs ending Dan9:12, + Dan9:13, which itself
runs 49 syllables, same as Dan9:4. Get
the pun? 14 sevens (49, bookended)! So this shortfall was 'saved' by
Daniel.
· That's another reason
why Paul will use '56' as his beginning and elliptical
ending. How do we know? Paul climactically tags his own syllable 252 as well, to end
Ephesians 1:10! Saving All Time!
· Why? Well, behold Psalm 90:13, ending with its own
syllable 252: "Return, Oh God! How long?!
Feel sorry for your servants."
So, Daniel invokes it! So, Paul
also tags it! What accounting genius! [I bet your head is swimming now, since mine
is. Go get coffee or milk, yell and
scream, then return.]
· Do you get the pun
yet? Psalm 90:13 is Moses' vote, while
he was in the wilderness. God seemed
far away, Israel still in slavery; yet God told Moses, Go Away; so he
did. Note the parallel: Temple Down, God seems far away; Daniel 'votes' the 252. So Paul, capitalizing on his readers' oral
familiarity with Scripture and hence syllable counts, pegs his own syllable
252,
to church-fulfills-time-by-divine
design, Ephesians 1:10!
[Nerd Note: Moses' voting to Leave
Egypt due to Voting For God, is in Exodus 2:15, Acts 7:29, Hebrews 11:27. The Exo passage was his initial reaction, but
God ordered him to leave, too. Then
ordered him back, Exo 4:19; which is bookended in structure, so from it you
know God ordered that Moses flee, initially.
Same parallel idea is used in Matt2, with Joseph. Problem with Hebrew yare and Greek phobew
is that the verbs mean both fear
and respect, so it's sometimes
hard to tell the difference. We know
from Hebrews 11:27 that it wasn't Pharaoh whom Moses feared, but a
Different King.]
Meter Note J
Pregnancy 1, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
· Third shortfall is yet future
from Daniel, and the reason for his prayer: the PROMISE that if the
votes complete, Temple will be restored and MESSIAH can be born and
complete. This promise Daniel metrically
invokes, in his prayer (again,
in verses 1-13, and verse 16), giving rise to God's explicit reply of '62 weeks' in
Daniel 9:25 (364
reimbursement plus a new 70). Here's a
2-minute summary of Isaiah's pattern: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJr9PZhlJ9g
.
· The fourth 56
is
Christ. For Isaiah 53:11-12 sum 70 syllables, not
56. Meaning? The Vote Will Complete.
See why Moses put 14 syllables
inside Psalm 90:1-4, omitting them from the end? Note how Isaiah 53:9+11 (56
syllables!) 'reply' to Psalm 90:17 --which is about HANDS? Stated TWICE? Yeah, God-Man, Two Natures in One
Person; God Adds Hands And Prospers (Isa53:10b, Son becomes The Christ), delivers His
People!
·
So Paul keys off that
fourth 56, by datelining his own Eph1:3-14, with a first-sevened
paragraph of '56' (Christ's 57th
birthday, really). AND, his syllable sum ending verse 14, is 434!
Isn't it amazing what
a little syllable-counting can do, to reveal Bible meaning? And just think: in Paul's day, that's what everyone did! Memorize aurally, count syllables to test
memory, while thrashing wheat, on foot to Jerusalem or Ephesus, waiting in line
to pay the tax farmer... So imagine
how enjoyable it was, to recall Bible in metered, doctrinally-significant
sections!
Isn't it sad, how
today we think God must be boring to be majestic, how we consign Bible learning
in the original-language texts to 'the scholars', though once upon a time every
kid in Israel learned it by heart -- so we're stuck with churchy and snoozy translations,
so ambiguous that anyone can 'make' them imply whatever they want them to
mean? End Commercial Message.
o
Next, 14. (See
also End Note G.) Double
7's.
Evokes 77, 70 x 7, 490. In Bible, it's a nexus. Or a prelude: first two dove-sendings by Noah, Gen8:8, 10,
12. Third time, she didn't return, just
as Christ didn't return from His Arrest, as shown by three sevens in Isaiah
53:7. Which Arrest, Noah's third
dove-sending, depicted. [See my FloodChronoREVISED.doc.
LXX text and Exodus 12 combine to show there's a four-day hiatus between
the third sending, and Noah's Birthday.
This period needs no mention, as it stands for the Lamb Set Aside Date.]
o
NEXUS. First seven ENDS
something. Second 7 BEGINS
something. Sometimes they're reversed. That's the pattern of '14', pan-Bible, Seven
fat and lean years. Before that, the
doubled-sevens Jacob had to work to get Rachel. Before that, Noah's 7-day warning to get
in da boat, and his waiting the first seven days to send the
dove, as distinct from the other two dove-sendings. So doubled sevens, aren't inevitably
contiguous: 7 year civil war fronted David's becoming king; he lived seven years after retiring.
o
You see the pattern.
That Is How Paul Uses Ephesians 1:10. Same structure as Moses used for Psalm 90's
first four and last two verses, except that Christ is 'in the middle'. Get the wit: Moses 'encased' the
14 inside God's 84-syllable Decree, Psalm 90:1-4. Christ is God. So Paul 'encases' the first two
91's representing the Decree to Create Christ and His Life down here (subject
of Isaiah 52:13-15), inside a 56 + 14,
with Christ being AGE 56 when Paul writes! Is that Divine Wit, or what? More on this Pregnant 14, will follow later.
o
Psalm 90: 11-13 uses 14, three
times. Noahic vote, verse 11: Who knows Your Anger? Just as Your Respect
[for
Your Righteousness],
even so.. Your Wrath! Double-entendre, that. We don't know His anger, for He spent it on
His Son -- on the Cross! We also
don't know His Anger, since we don't care to know -- Him.
Followed by, Psalm
90:12,
now Moses' own vote: Teach us to number our days. Then his famous 90:13,
Return, Oh Lord! How Long?! The three 14's = 42, one half of 84. Hence
Matthew 2's genealogy adopts the 42, shows 42 legitimate generations of
kings culminating in Messiah (leaving out Athaliah's kids). Matthew apes Isaiah's 42 syllables in
Isa52:13-14, Decree to Create The Last David Who Saves Israel. Of course, He saved the Gentiles too,
so Luke 3 adds Isa52:15's syllables (35), to create his narrative of 77 generations.
Meter Note J
Pregnancy 1, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
77th Son.
The Two Sevens of
History.
The Nexus.
Made Fat with Divine
Truth,
Delights Himself in
fatness, Isaiah 55:2,
deixzai autoi, phws, LXX Isa53:11.
Yeah, because all Fat
is the Lord's, Lev 3:16.
"I am the Way,
the Truth and the Life."
Made Lean on the
Cross,
Fattened up with our
sins.
o
Daniel 9 treats the 14 with ashamed
silence. Or reverence. By Daniel 9:14, when he ends the legal basis
for his petition (beginning
in verse 15),
his syllable sum is 490-14=476. shortfall. Total prayer including petition, runs 742 syllables: should have been 750, the Sevens of Allotted Time. But short, 56. Because, Allotted Time was 14 short, when he
prayed. So to get it back, Christ
would have to come First.
o
And,
He would. That leads to the next
factor, 77.
As we just saw, the 77th Son would be Born
on Time. So to play on both 14 and 77 at the same time,
Paul uses 14's
as bookends: as you'll soon see below,
in Pregnancy 2.
o
All
History waited for that 77th Son, Romans 8:11 in Greek (pregnancy analogy,
Paul never tires of using it). David died at
age 77 due to his Greater Son.
o
Moses
also pegged the Last Adam's birth to the First Adam's 1050 and the Noahic 1050,
with a 77-syllable cluster
nested in Psalm 90:8-10.
·
Verse 8, was the last part of the Adamic period vote
(the
content reflecting what believers thought), Our sins are illuminated before You
-- yeah, Messiah would turn our darkness into His Light on the Cross,
LXX of Isaiah 53:11, deixzai autoi, phws.
·
Verse 9, now Noahic content, For all of our days
turn in your anger; all our years, end
with a groaning sigh.
·
Then
verse 10: Our days run 70
years, or if in good health even 80 years, we live; but at the end,
whoosh! we fly up. Just like James would later say, our lives
are nothing but a vapor trail in the sky.
[James 4:14, but he built it on a quote of
Psalm 90:5-6, in James 1:10-11. So he
has Ps90:10 in mind, in 4:14, look at his context. Nerd note on Psalm 90:10. Noah would
know the future life expectancy, and this passage seems a real play on
numbers. For just as Moses is doing in
Psalm 90, the number 70 depicted a 490 (70 x 7) or even a 1050, since there was
only one such unit in a 1050. The 80,
depicted the 560, since there are 10 sevens in a 70. So think: when Noah was born, life expectancy
was roughly 1050 years, as illustrated by Methusaleh. But he himself, was alive 500 years when
he voted during the voting window.
Cute, huh.]
o
Isaiah 53 uses the 77 as a sum in
Isa52:13-15, David's age at death.
Played on by Luke, Last David is the 77th Son. Idea that both of them Live And Die On Time.
Saving, Time. David got six Time Grants
keyed to his death, and kingship dates (both beginning and ending). History was greatly impacted by their
deadlines:
·
Temple reconstruction was deadlined by the 490th
anniversary of his Hebron kingship, which Daniel 9 uses as its start
point, in the Marching Meleks of 9:5 et seq. That deadline was 520 bc; and we know from Haggai 2, that Temple reconstruction
re-commenced without stopping, in 521 bc. [I trace that out in http://www.brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#Purim
. That section is long, so next search on '537' to go straight to the
Rebuilding. Extensive Bible quotes are
linked, there.]
·
Temple completion was deadlined by the 490th anniversary of
David's retirement, 513 bc. So God made the 70 years end 3 years prior,
586-70=516.
·
Purim was deadlined by the 490th anniversary of David's death,
473 bc. Ironically, that was the year Haman had
'divined' for the death of the Jews. [You'll find these
deadlines compared to the events, in rows 138-144, highlighted in royal blue,
in http://www.brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls.]
Meter Note J
Pregnancy 1, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
·
The
other three Time Grants were 1000's, and again History was
impacted:
·
The 77th Son had to be born by the 1000th
anniversary of David's consolidated kingship, else that 1000-year promise (and time grant) would expire;
·
He would have to die no later than the 1000th anniversary
of David's death, which was 57 years before the Millennium was to begin,
long encoded in the Mosaic Law.
·
In the event, He died on the 1000th anniversary of
David's retirement. ['Scholars' claim David died at age 70,
dismiss 1Kings 6:1 as an error, since it's the 11th year of Solomon. They don't READ 1Kings1 - 2:39, which covers
to END OF 3rd YEAR AFTER DAVID DIED. So
'4th year of Solomon', is post-David; so
you KNOW FROM BIBLE he was 77 when he died!]
o
As
with 14,
Daniel 9 is silent on 77. He balances to 490, but no verses sum 77
syllables. How sad.
o
But the 77th Son, was Born on
Time. For God answered Daniel, with a '77'. Because, Daniel Voted On Time. That's why Paul could be born, write about
Him Who Was Born to Die and Save, thus generating...
Pregnancy 1b, Ephesians 1:7-9,
Meter sum 91 =
13 sevens,
but +56 = 147 same as Pregnancy 1a
Son's Temple Voting
(2nd 'Glory' paragraph, Father Glorifying Son: see Outline).
Meter Pattern for verses 7-9 = 28 + 56 + 7
o
This Pregnancy 1b, is still His Own; but Church is His Body, get it? Of course, that's exactly what
verses 7-9, say. Our Childless Savior (Isa53:8), Pregnant with Her.
On the Cross, Isaiah 53:11. In
order to make sons, Isaiah 53:10. So
the Sterile Bears Kids, Isaiah 54:1! And we 'kids' weren't even born yet; He
contracted for our birth in advance per Father's Discretion, Matt 16:18,
John 17:17-23, based on Isa53:10! So
what's the metrical pregnancy nesting?
§ 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56
+ 7 + 14 (nested 56's, Vote Crucial)
§ 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 (nested 63's, Vote Short)
§ 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 +56 + 7 + 14 (nested
70's, Vote Complete)
§ 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 77's, Death Successful)
§ 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 +
56 + 7 + 14 (nested 77's)
§ 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 84's, Decree
Complete)
§ 56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 91's, Decree
Complete, Loss Made Up)
o
Verses 7-9,
syllables: 91
= 28
+ 56
+ 7. [See Note e on 28, and Note f on 63, and Note c on 84.]
o
Isaiah 53:9 or 11 = 28; 53:9+10 or 53:10+11 = 63; 52:15 to 53:2 or 53:9 to 11 or 53:4 to 6 = 91.
o
Psalm 90's 63's are: sum at its verse 3, any trio among verses 4, 8, 9, 16; sum of verses 14 to 16.
o
Psalm 90's 28 sum is in its verses
11-13 (palindrome
of three 14's).
o
Psalm 90's 84 + 7 = 91 sum is in its verses
4-8, 8-11, 12-16. Note 70-year voting
periods precede or follow 21's, to stress Voting Causes Time to Exist. Paul
thus patterns his 91's chiefly on Psalm 90. For Israel's
Negative Vote is the legal basis for the Rapture: hence Matt16:18, 'Esther'
is sought, as Vashti refused to come, Matt22.
o
Daniel 9 doesn't use the factors directly. Dan 9:13+14 = 91. Text is poignant, on negative
voting. Verse 13, Just as written in the Law of
Moses, all this evil has come upon us [Daniel thinks of Lev 26
and Deut 28 when he talks]; and even so, we STILL aren't heartbroken enough to turn back to The Lord
Our God, turn away from our sins, (re)turn to Wisdom within Your Truth. Daniel
next says in verse 14, So God sent us evil; for Our God is Righteous in all His Acts that He
does; for we did not listen, to His Voice.
Dan9:7, 91 x 2 = 182, cumulative syllable count, equals the difference between his last sevened
paragraph, verse 4 @49 syllables, and verse 7, @182. The difference is 133, which ties to Isaiah 53:2's end +Psalm 90:7's end. Both passages are on man's anger/disrespect
of God, resulting in God's 'anger' in reply.
By contrast, Paul antiphonally pegs the same syllable 133 with Doxology to Son's Glory (Eph1:6). All four passages admit God is righteous;
with our happy chorus, at the end.
Meter Note J Pregnancy 2, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse
3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14
Pregnancy 2, Ephesians
1:10b-14,
Meter sum 91+91
= 13+13 sevens,
but +56 = 147+147, same as Pregnancy 1a and 1b
Church Temple Voting
for Son and
Church Temple
Construction by Spirit
(last half of 2nd and all of third
'Glory' paragraphs, see Outline.)
Meter Pattern for verses 10b-14 = 49 + 7 + 35 + 91
o
Verses 10b-12,
another 91 syllables with factors: 49 + 7 + 35. [See Note a on 49, Note e on 35.]
o
The 49 plays a dateline function in Dan9:4 and 13, for he prays at the start of the
49th year; Paul blatantly ties to that
with prothesin, in Eph 1:11. It's
climactic (so always mistranslated, of course).
o
Next, Psalm 90:5 to 7, its verses 10 to 11, both use 49.
o There's no 49 in Isaiah 53.
o
Both
Psalm 90 passages are during Gentile 'times'. Both are Flood-related. Idea of the world being close to ending. Same theme, in Daniel. Thus we have a clearer sense that although 49
is the number of years between Jubilees in the Law, historically it represents
negative votes. Which surely we know
from Israel's Temple Down, however much we mistake the 49 missed sabbatical years, for 70. [Eusebius carelessly back-slapped 70 onto
586BC, and for centuries no one asked, Why Did God Let Them Return In Year
49? Read his own miscalculation for
yourself, here: http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/eusebius_chronicon_01_text.htm
-- search on '432 years', then read to '502' years. Then, groan.]
o
Now
we come to 35. Psalm 90 uses it in verses 10 and
17. Here, interplay among the four
passages is extremely deft. [To know why, see My
video on Isaiah 53's meter-as-chronology:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOXuVeUthq4.]
o
Isaiah
back-tags Moses' 35, in
Isa52:15, 53:10 (bookends), and 53:3, 4, (mirror).
In Isaiah's metered chronology
usage,
o
End
Isaiah 53:4, Temple Down, 586 bc, syllable 203, is the end of a
'35'.
o
Dan9:12 tags Isa53:4, pegging to Manasseh's birth. (He's the reason for Temple
Down, 2Kings 21:11-15, 23:26, 24:3, Jer15:4).
o
7th syllable into the last
clause of Isa53:6, began the last missed sabbatical year, @Isaiah's syllable 252.
o
Psalm 90:13's syllable 252 had poignantly
cried, "Return, Oh Lord! How
Long?!"
o
Daniel doubly tags
both prior chapters in his 9:13, via cumulative differences in
his own meter to 'sum' at 252 (same method used to
'tag' syllables 133 and 203). For Daniel,
Isaiah 53:6's syllable 252 (hiph'gia) stood for the Year To
Invoke 1 Kings 9 Contract, Pray For Temple Return (early 538BC); Cyrus dies by the
end Isa 53:6 (=530BC).
o
Paul tags Ephesians
1:10 to that same syllable
252, thus mapping to all three prior writers at the same place. Paul also does this Daniel-style (via differences), as well as directly,
for syllable 133. He also does it at syllables 77 (Isaiah) and 84 (Moses), 175 (Moses) and 238 (Moses), but not 203 (Isaiah 53:4). Guess why.
o
Daniel's meter is a day-late-and-dollar-short
chronological pattern; he recounts the
kings' years from David forward, dividing where they became good (for awhile)
or went bad. So there are no 70's, and
no 35's.
o 7 is the
base; as a standalone, Paul repeats it thrice, Eph 1:4d, 9d,
11c; severally matches Isaiah 53:7's first 3 clauses.
o
Isaiah 53:7 reads niggas
wa hu na'ane 7,
wa lo yiph'tach piu 7 ka
seh latevah yuval 7 -- Future
Temple's carried off to His Execution sans protest. So compare Paul's antiphonal verse
4d, katenwpion autou; then, 9d, proetheto en autwi, then 11c, tou
ta panta energountos. Yeah, He dies
and goes where? TO FATHER! Having What? Been the Willing
Substitute for Sin! And what happens as
a result of His being slaughtered for our sins?
Father works all things IN HIM!
o
Neither Psalm 90 nor Daniel use standalone sevens.
o
Verses
13-14, another 91 syllables.
No subfactors. Indivisible. With Liberty and Justice for All. It looks intentional:
o
Isaiah
52:15-53:2 or 53:9-11
(91), 53:4-6 (91).
o
Psalm 90's 84 + 7 = 91 sum is in verses
4-8, 8-11, 12-16. Notice how the 70-year
voting periods precede or follow 21's, to stress Voting Causes Time to Exist. Paul
patterns his 91's chiefly on Psalm 90. For Israel's
Negative Vote is the legal basis for the Rapture: hence Matt16:18, 'Esther'
is sought, as Vashti refused to come, Matt22.
o Daniel9:13+14 = 91. Daniel 9:7, 91 x 2
= 182,
cumulative syllable count.
Meter Note J
Pregnancy 2, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2
14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Now
look at the Ephesians 1:3-14 palindromes, heavily piggybacked, like Moses and Isaiah did.
Here we have the meter of the whole passage, sum of Pregnancy 1
and 2:
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +
28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 +
7 +14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 56's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 +21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7+14 + 49+ 7
+ 35 + 91 (nested
42's and 63's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 +49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 49's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28
+ 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +49 + 7 +35 + 91 (nested
70's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 84's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
Again we see
concurrently, only Pregnancy 1, at 'left' of the first '14' (=verse 10):
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested
56's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 +21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7+14 + 49+ 7
+ 35 + 91 (nested
42's and 63's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested
70's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14
(nested 77's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +
28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 77's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 84's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +
28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 91's)
Look at the
meaning:
Paul
takes ALL the meters in Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9, fits them
together in CHURCH. For CHURCH is in
CHRIST. This underscores the point he makes in
Eph1:10, that we are the summing-up of all Trial matters (Angelic Conflict). No way to misread that verse, when you see
the meter. No way to conclude
preterism valid, now.
Preterism
recognizes that Church is a culmination, and higher. But it doesn't recognize that the time owed
the Jews, VESTED IN CHRIST, which Moses, Isaiah and Daniel have long
explained. So the Trib and Mill must be
paid, and we as Bride are the Bridge Back to the Time Owed Christ. And to be fair, most Dispies don't understand
that, either. But the meter makes it
plain.
Meter has doctrinal meaning, as we've seen now, 50+ pages worth,
attested in Scripture anywhere you want to look, the following individual or
group factors. Maybe you'll find
additional meanings, but here's what I can prove, so far:
· 7 is the basic Divine
Building Block.
· 14 is repeat, fat and lean years, creature
failure to meet Divine Deadline.
Conversely, means God-Man.
Ps90:11,12,13.
· 21 is Temple Building, half a 42, Noah's
thrice-sent dove, Jacob's time outside the Land, Ps90:4,8,9,16.
· 28 is failure (?) at Temple Building, half a 56 (=
14 x 2, two positives must offset -- so try again).
Isa 53:9,11,
Ps90:11+12, 12+13, 13+14.
· 35 is half-a-vote (or one party of two, voting;
with the other party yet to vote). Isa 52:15, 53:3,4,10.
· 42 is generation-building, Ps90:8+9, Isa53:13+14,
Dan 9:14, 17.
· 49 is generation building problem; or, on the
verge of completion. Daniel 9:4, 13; Ps90:5+6+7.
· 56 is Vote Critical, Isa53:1+2, 5+6. Psalm
16+17, 13+14+15, 9+10.
· 63 is Vote Short, Isaiah 53:10-11 (they kill Him
7 years early); Ps90:14+15+16.
· 70 is Vote Completed. Mimics Isaiah 53:3+4, 7+8.
· 77 is Winning Death, mimics 70 x 7 = 490. Mimics, Isaiah 52:13-15.
· 84 is Decree Completed. Mimics Psalm 90:1-4.
· 91 is Decree Completed with Loss Made Up. 91 = 28 + 56+7=63, Isaiah; =
70 + 21, Moses.
This is deliberate. Handy too; for while you threshed wheat or
walked to town, you could easily recall and mull over Scripture, thus obeying
Deut 6:5-12.
Meter Note J
Pregnancy 2, continued Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14
Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Look again at the Ephesians 1:3-14 palindromes, heavily
piggybacked, like Moses and Isaiah did.
Here we have the meter of the whole passage, sum of Pregnancy 1
and 2:
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 49's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 56's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 +21 + 28 + 14 +
28 +56 + 7 +14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 42's and 63's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28
+ 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7
+ 35 +91 (nested 70's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
Again
we see concurrently, only Pregnancy 1, at 'left' of the ending '14' (=in verse
10):
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 +49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 49's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested
56's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 +21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7+14 + 49+ 7
+ 35 + 91 (nested
42's and 63's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested
70's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +
28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 77's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 77's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 84's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +
28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 91's)
Now Look at
the Sequence:
o
You see Messiah's extra 7 years owed His Life, cut out since He was
rejected seven years EARLY, is symbolized the tally contiguous with His 'time in
Father', 56+ Pregnancy 1 (the sequence 21+7+21+28+14). Him in eternity past as the text says,
verses 3-6, with focus on second clause in verse 4, through verse
6. First Quarter of 'Time', as it
were. Time when we too were only
'alive', in His Head as GOD (all
those 'before I formed you I knew you' verses in the OT).
o
So the first seven, Daniel 9's 62nd 'week', was part of
His life Decreed from eternity past, 'inside' Eph 1:4. It didn't end up playing out, as He was
rejected. Paul all at once
targets the 7th Hebrew syllable of Isa53:2 AND its LXX enantion autou. Greek preposition enantion connotes
being before someone in a TRIAL. The
stronger katenwpion autou denotes Successful Trial Outcome, meeting the
Judge's Standard. Ergo Good Report (epainon)
aka 'praise' of Eph1:6 eternity-past purpose, again relates to Isaiah
53:1. So despite being cut short,
He will Meet The Standard. God's.
o
That ties to Isaiah 52:13-15, so Paul's total is also 77 syllables; for Isaiah
52:13-15, is the Decree to Create Christ.
Paul
parallels Isaiah's 42 then 35 syllables.
Paul makes it 56 and 21 syllables.
Ergo the metric shorthand:
Isaiah, 42=generation-building, 35=One Party (God) voting. Christ's eternity-past 'reply' is 56=Vote
Critical, 21=Temple-Building. And of
course the sum = Successful Death, not merely completed vote. All of which was Decreed in Mutual Contract, Isaiah
53:10.
o
Mosaic
84
in Psalm 90's Decree=Christ and the Millennium owed Him, is here shown as a 77, like Isaiah's
truncation of 84
to 77
in Isa52:13-15. Notice the 28+56, and
how the second 7 is to the right, again stressing He Met the Standard
despite dying 7 years early, this time with the sum 28+56+7=91, showing how His
early Death nonetheless made up for the loss.
Conclusion? This time is owed CHRIST as a prerequisite
for His Second Advent to be 'delivered', since He paid for it.
o
So
56+21=77 repeats
with two added, nested 77's; with a 'pregnant' 70 between them, +7+21+28+14. Note the first 14 closes verse 6. Two Trib sevens, now funded, yet to play. Mimicking, Moses 'housing' the 14, inside
Psalm 90:4. In other words, the foreknown rejection still was allowed to occur; God
won't compromise Freedom. So
the extra 7's, are real and owed Christ. Cleverly attested by the words Paul
chooses, in that last clause of Eph1:6:
"within, the Beloved".
No way to miss that meaning, if you know the meter. And of course, Paul's audience did know it,
that's why Paul used it.
o
Next,
notice the first 14 is last in the sequence. A 'left' bookend.
o
Now to the right of that first 14, another 91, factored as 28+56+7. Which factors, are exactly what Isaiah 53:9-11,
says. In both meter AND plain text. This
meter thingy makes it easier to "apprehend the exact thought of the
writer", huh.
Meter Note
J Pregnancy 2, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Still on Ephesians 1:3-14 palindromes, heavily piggybacked, like
Moses and Isaiah did.
Here we have the meter of the whole passage, sum of Pregnancy 1
and 2:
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 49's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 + 28 + 56 + 7
+ 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 56's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 +21 + 28 + 14 +
28 +56 + 7 +14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested
42's and 63's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28
+ 14 + 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7
+ 35 +91 (nested 70's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
Still
we see concurrently, only Pregnancy 1, at 'left' of the ending '14' (=in verse
10):
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 +
14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 49's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested
56's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 +21 + 28 +14 +28 +56 + 7+ 14 + 49+ 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 42's and 63's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 +21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested
70's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +
28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 77's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 77's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 + 28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91 (nested 84's)
·
56 + 21 + 7 + 21 +
28 + 14 +28 + 56 + 7 + 14 (nested 91's)
Still on the Sequence:
o
Verses 7-9, now, portraying Him
on earth. Still Pregnancy
1,
but just as verses 7-9 say, now it's
Hebrews 10:5ff time, Him Being Made into The Copybook, creating the Asset
Base from which our inheritance is derived, his John 14 discourse on making
a House for us, Eph 1:7-9. [Remember that the NT is serially
written, but the information was known long prior. So the fact John's Gospel didn't come out
until the mid-90's AD, doesn't mean the material was unknown,
prior.]
o
So Pregnancy 1 is the SUM of
eternity past as God
(and all the
foreknowledge of what He'd become, as Human), plus what He actually became: verses 4-6, starting at the second clause of verse 4 (eternity past), plus verses 7-9 (His Time Down Here). Moreover, Paul's
meter tells us what Bible passages to cross-reference; even as, his explicit
text. Great economy of concordance.
o
Pregnancy 1 Is Our
Precedence. Not, Israel. Again legally, verses 3-14 are one
sentence. Nothing outside it, 'counts'.
o
So
now look at what's to the right of the second 14 (verse 10a), notice
that the 56+7
and 49+7
are attached to it, Summing Up the Trial.
So what does that tell you? If
we don't VOTE, verse 10 won't finish.
Just as Hebrews 11:39-40 will say.
o
Pregnancy 2: + 49 + 7 + 35 + 91.
o
Note
these numbers include a separate 7. No
longer two, but only one. The one we
Bridge to. Yet future.
o
So
by using 91's twice on the other side of Ephesians 1:10a, Paul
metrically depicts our BRIDGING role, just as the explicit text of Eph1:10,
says.
o
Just
as with verse 4, the second clause
of verse 10, begins another 91.
o
Both
the first clause in verse 4 and the first clause in verse 10, are Decrees.
o
Verse
4, our position in Him. Verse 10, our function
in Him. Between, our assets in
him on earth, now in him in
heaven; so into us is the Shewbread Plan, second clause in verse 11. So en
him, to eis us to eis Him, eis to einai Heis as He
prayed, in John 17.
o
That's GOD's vote: last clause verse 11 through verse 12, is
factored at 35.
One Party Voted, just like Paul said in Galatians 3:20.
o
And where's our vote? Oh, we have the same problem as Israel
did! 49. 7. We will be short. We won't use Time to study Bible, even as she
didn't use her sabbatical years to study.
2000 years later, and it's still true.
o
People forget, 'Rapture' is not a
happy thing. It means, no one is
believing, anymore. Just
like the Flood. So here, Paul tells us a time will come when we
believers will not vote for god anymore. Just as Moses and Isaiah warned Israel.
[We don't have sabbatical years, but we do vote. Again, Israel is outside the sentence. Voting was a rule pre-Israel, as I hope
you've seen by now.]
o
So Who will make sure Father's Decree will be met, since we too have
our own 56
(49+7) problem? The Spirit. Shown by, a non-factored 91, closing the
passage. Cute, huh. So now do you see why Paul finishes his verse
sum, at 434?
Meter Note J Pregnancy 14 Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14
Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So a Pregnant 14 Juridically Caused
Pregnancy 1 and
Pregnancy 2.
o Israel's rejection is
our raison d'etre. That 14 is pretty pregnant,
huh. Shortage predicted and tracked ever since Psalm 90, signifying Israel would vote
negative. Daniel 9, Two Trib Sevens,
one 'embedded' within the 62nd week. [Which preterist scholars count as only ONE
that 'played' in 64-70AD, as they ASSume Bible uses lunar years (490 lunar
years = 483 solar, so the extra 7 is overlooked).]
o
Israel in effect used that extra seven to reject Christ
rather than accept Him. That's the
parallel Paul draws, for Church. So
let's review its significance.
Had Israel accepted
Him, He'd have lived to age 40, so would have been king as long as David; after
the Cross, the 50 years would instantly start, followed by the Trib, just as
the Mosaic Law always said.
So
that seven was a hanging chad, since if she had accepted Him, He'd have
died On Time.
However, she rejected
Him; so that extra seven, played AGAINST her. At the time Paul writes, everyone was aware
this seven had to play out within 40 years after the Crucifixion, since that's
what Daniel 9:26 says would happen: Messiah
Down, then Temple Down. Since Israel
rejected Him, '50' no longer was the ellipsis 'number' applicable to the
situation; but rather the owed '40', since Israel was 40 years late getting
into the Land (wandering
in the wilderness, as Paul explained in Acts 13:20ff). So the 'Land' would be 'repaid' for being
'shorted' Temple Time. So the Gentiles would be 'paid' the '40' owed their
'time' due to Abraham maturing 54 years too early. The 14, of course, was time already spent rebuilding the
Temple (21
years to build, including slack time, rather than the standard of 7).
So, they expected
Temple Down and Rapture, from 'our'
64-70AD. That's why Paul wrote, benchmarking the
first 94 syllables for the date-setters.
To remind them it was about VOTING in Daniel's day, and is STILL
about Voting. For what did
Daniel 9:14 say when he finished the indictment portion of his prayer? WE
DID NOT LISTEN TO YOUR VOICE, SO ALL
THIS EVIL HAS COME UPON US.
And at Dan9:14's end, how many
syllables? 476. 14 short!
o
Accordingly,
now there is only ONE seven, the Tribulation. And just as it was a hanging chad for
Israel, it remains one for us. If we
reject Christ too, history stops. Just
because God predicts the outcome, doesn't mean it's forced. TIME CAN END. It almost did many times before, pattern of
the Flood. God foreknew Israel would
vote negative; He foreknows Church will complete, but
individually, each of us can harm the world by not voting properly. So TEMPLE DOWN is a real issue for us,
just as it was for Israel.
DOWN, is what we in Christendom
have been. For 2000 years, we don't know
this meter? Which any CHILD learns to
count? Not known, when Christ was born and died? Can't count to 3 DAYS AND 3 NIGHTS? Not known, that hello God is HOLY, so YES
All Sins Of All Humanity Were PAID On The Cross, just as Isa53:10's asham,
says! For 2000 years we've argued baby
theologies, Hebrews 6:1-6 our sad biography.
No wonder history is brutish. It's
our fault, Leviticus 26 and Deut 28! No preterist or Replacement-Theology
believer has EVER matured. You can't
mature by rejecting Time owed CHRIST, who is also King of the JEWS!
I often hear people
complain, 'oh, you should just try to
get along', in the name of Christian fellowship, of course. Yeah, that was Israel's compromising history,
too. 2John9-11 orders shunning, see also
Titus 3:10, 2Tim2:26-3:5, many other passages.
o
So now notice: Paul shows the 'summation of Trial matters' via Church,
verse 10a -- via standalone '14'; same style as in Psalm 90. Examine Psalm 90:11-13, three 14's.
That was Noah and Moses' vote.
God will fulfill it. But we'll
be PUNISHED.
o
Paul thus shows Church has the same
VOTING ROLE as Israel who Spurned Her Husband When He Came. So God's Promises won't be fulfilled until
Church Vote Completes, Heb11:39-40. Scary
stuff, To Carry Time (Deut
32:8). Paul
stresses our role of 'Bridge' Back to Time, just as Daniel functioned as a
bridge during the Diaspora. For Israel
is in Diaspora again.
o
So notice how Pregnancy 2 started out
as Him being Pregnant with Us, now leads to Us being Pregnant with Him, Gal
4:19. And thus, Deliver Time. Clever play on Chronos, Gal 4:4. Just as Noah was 'pregnant' with the human
race while still in the Ark, here we are 'pregnant' with the Future Deliverance
of Promises To Israel and the World: in Our Ark, aka The Lord Jesus
Christ. It's the Wifely Thing to Do.
Meter Note J Pregnancy 14, cont.
Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
o
Quad 91's, four dimensions of a
'building', John 14:2's monai (with bloodline wordplay) and John 17's
oneness, all due to Christ's Successful Vote Which Rebirthed Time! Now you know why Paul says what he did, in
Gal 4:4; why he prays as he does in
Eph1:15-23, 3:15-19; why he uses a lexeme, in Eph 3:21; most importantly, now
you know why Ephesians 2 reads as it does.
OT+Trib+Mill=one wall; Church=Other Wall.
Israel
Is Not Church. Church is not Israel,
either. God Never Reneges On His
Promises. Cut out the Jews, and you cut
out your own inheritance. Saved, still
-- but forever naked, dependent on someone who didn't do that, for your
welfare. Happy forever, but .. like the
baby you insisted on remaining, playing with your diaper theology, down here.
Sorry,
but bluntness is needed: if we don't
acquaint the preterists and Replacement-Theology believers of the awesome
Divine Discipline going with those doctrines, they won't grow up and we will be
to blame, Ezekiel 3:16-21. Strong words
are needed, as those people are completely full of themselves, and hence
DEAF. Maybe better to just bypass them,
INSTEAD giving the warning to those willing to hear it. So the warning still goes out as it should, but YOU don't waste your time giving such
pearls, directly to the pigs that'll trample and waste your time with their
sterile, deaf arguments. 2000 YEARS,
and they still don't get it.
o
So
Paul pointedly stops the meter at 434, evocative of
Israel's 62
sevens
in Daniel 9:26c, to make obvious we are in a Time Bubble; to show it's Church's responsibility to vote,
and that we will have a history of NOT VOTING PROPERLY; so it's a real
threat, that Time ends. For us, that
ending IS the Rapture.
Again, those who don't
believe in the Rapture will never mature, but the Completion of Church Only
Depends On Those Maturing, really. We
already have enough babies. We don't have enough kings. Doesn't
require many kings, to complete Church, as God is not a bureaucrat. Even with a heavenly population of 100
billion, 1000 kings should suffice. [A guess I derive from various estimates in http://www.brainout.net/LvS4b.htm;
search on 'calculate these' after you load the page, to go to that section.]
Well, we've not gotten
that far. What a sad thing. This is not to imply you mature if you
believe in the Rapture, either. It's one
of many doctrines one must mature IN, to mature at all. Maturation has two distinct sides: knowing the Doctrine properly, and living it
out, properly. Can't live out what you
disbelieve or don't know; can't mature
until you live it out, either. Knowledge
AND pram (practice), not just one or the other. And of course, practice +knowledge without
Love, means nothing, 1Cor13:3. The goal
of knowing, IS loving. This motivates
practice, 2Cor5:14, 20. So this is the
holy trinity of maturation. That's why
Paul prays Eph 3:15-19!
o
So Rapture can occur, tomorrow. There are enough people in any generation
since the Cross who properly know the Rapture doctrine and believe
in it. And the rest will be Raptured up
as well, Body Complete: NO rewards.
o Paul stopping at 434, as we saw in verse
4, also stresses when he writes, dated in terms of Years from The King Who
Renewed Time, Jesus the Christ, via Years Remaining in the 490 (434=490-56). It's the same Equidistant Style as Moses,
Isaiah, and Daniel used for their own datelines, see page 3 of my http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc
.
o
One
'Year' of Time, 364. Plus, Voting, 70.
Just like the Time Grant to Daniel.
o
One 'Year' is also the sum of 280 days, typical
estimate of the normal gestation period for humans, plus
what? 84 . And 84 is what, besides the
Decree portion of Psalm 90:1-4, which Isaiah 53 split into
halves, which Matthew 1 used for his genealogy rhetoric, which Daniel
bookended in Dan9:14, 17, but which Paul split into four 21's, such that
42 is on the 'left' side of Ephesians 1:10, and 42 is on the 'right'
side? Well, here's what 84 is: 70+ what? 14!
o When
Noah was in das Boot, what was the length of time between the rain (Inundation,
lit. Hebrew, beginning-point), and when he sent out the carrion-eating
raven? 280
days, LXX 40+110+93+40=283. And what
happens when the Lord Returns? The birds
feast on Israel's enemies, Rev 19:17ff.
So what's in between? church pregnant, Rom 8:11ff.
[Nerd Note: The LXX Noahic time benchmarks are bookended
thus: 7+40+110+93+40+7, with the latter 40, when he sends the raven. That last seven, is the first sending of the
dove. The first seven is the warning, and the first 40, how many days it
rained. So: 40+110+93+40=283, still
within the pregnancy gestation period today's physicians consider typical,
measured from the onset of the last menstruation. In between the two 40's, are 203. Ring a bell?
As in, the 203rd syllable of Isaiah 53=586BC, Temple Down?
Benchmarked by Daniel?]
Meter Note
j Paul's
Chronology Meter Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Paul's Chronology of Future Church History
Related
sections, prior: first section of Meter Notes, Meter Tagging Styles, Videos on the
topic.
We've
only seen thus far: a) Paul's use of 56 as a
dateline, Ephesians 1:4; and b) how Paul
benchmarked expected Rapture dates for syllables
66, 73, 77 and 84. What about the rest of
the passage? Surely he intends an
ongoing chronology:
o
Daniel used three
consecutive chronologies via his selfsame meter;
o
Isaiah focused one track, and
o
Moses used two, in Psalm
90.
o
These Time Tracks were charted in my http://www.brainout.net/Ps90Isa53Dan9Eph1.doc ,
starting on page 3. (If you prefer pdf,
just change 'doc' to pdf.) Footnote E
there, also shows Daniel's chronological uses line by line. You'll need that text handy, to grasp this
section's flow; use its green-linked
maps, as well. (pdf
links here: Daniel
Isaiah Moses ). [Isa53 and Ps90 line-by-line
uses are shown live from the BHS text in Psalm 90 and 10GGS videos, links on page 5.
Later on, all the Daniel and Ephesians sections will be on video, too.]
So how
does Paul use meter chronologically? Proving a rhetorical style means accounting
for all of its function, testing the meanwhile for consistency of
pattern. So let's do that, now. Maybe watch the 10 GGS videos starting with Episode 11a;
for I go through this chronology in those videos. Or, download my http://www.brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls
history worksheet, then scroll down to year 4143 from Adam (middle
yellow column), and follow the history along.
You'll always have a three-year variance, I can't yet fix that. But it will be close enough. [Usage tip: use Views, Custom
Views in Excel: lots of 'snapshots' to different times in history, easier
navigation. Be sure to put your mouse on
the red triangles, when you see them.]
Paul
started the what-if-the Rapture scenario, in syllable 66. Here,
he keeps epic Greek meter of 10 or 11, a threaded constant common
in the NT, Hebrew meter mixed with Greek: to show the Uniting Nature Of Our
Church 'Time' (i.e., Jews are included).
Paul
then does a very clever thing, at syllable 66.
Look: 66 x 7 is 462, same
number of syllables as Isaiah 53.
o
Isaiah had also subdivided his
Chapter 53, into bookends of 133: left
bookend was Isaiah 52:13 through 53:2;
the right bookend, was Isaiah 53:9-12.
Shown here near the end, in a two-minute video (also
linked back in Pregnancy 1, Third Shortfall): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJr9PZhlJ9g.
Symbolically, the
left 133
represented God's Decree, which we know from the text. God decrees, Messiah arrives, we don't
want Him. Textually, Isa53:3 begins
an antiphonal parenthesis, Isaiah responding to what he has just
depicted as a live movie, quoting what people will then say, wa lo hadar,
wa lo mareh. So his commentary (or God telling him to
make it),
goes from Isaiah 53:3, until Isaiah 53:8.
The right 133 bookend then began
in Isa53:9; God's Own Antiphonal Decree Response resumes, this time about
the Death and its aftermath. [LXX resumes verse 9
in 1st person, just as Isa52:13. That
antiphonal style is common in all the OT prophets, with many a scholar
commenting on it. You should be able to Google on Hebrew +antiphony, to
find it.]
o
So Daniel makes this very accounting
point as his ending petition in Dan 9:19, constructed from the difference
between that verse's syllables, and where he began the petition
in verse 15.
o
Summing up, at 266
syllables. 2 x 133! He's asking God to complete the right
bookend!
o
The aggregate syllable count of Daniel's prayer is 742, which
is 8 sevens short of the total 5250 period
allotted (including the Millennium), signifying again Israel is short. So Time is Short. That same 14,
spawned by the 49, which generated seven extra sabbatical years that can't be
redeemed, ended up being a '56'
issue. Hence the Tribulation.
o
Moreover, Daniel terminated his aggregate indictment of Israel
with two metrical benchmarks, 434 and 476, in
Daniel 9:13 and 14, respectively. The 434,
closed his Time Track 2, ending full circle to the date he prays. The 476 was
his Time Track 1 of the kings, closing at 607 bc,
when he was taken hostage.
o
Paul thus plays on both Daniel and Isaiah; Paul
starts and ends his own meter when his own 490, had 434 years
left. That sum was 28 less than
Isaiah's. Isaiah subdivided 28 into
21+7, for Temple Rebuilding time.
o
So Paul mixes both writers' metrical styles. Like them, he'll track time; and especially like Daniel , Paul will use meter to account how OUR VOTING continues or stops, Time
itself.
Meter Note j Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
o So Paul
picks up where Daniel 9 leaves off, for Church.
Using 91, to
show unity of
70 representing both the Jews and the voting period in force since
Adam; and, 21, which
Jewish observance of those 70 years per 490, 'bought' for Gentiles.
o
At the same time Paul subdivides his paragraphs to play off
Isaiah, in each '91'.
o Daniel
leaves off, at the 62nd week. Okay,
but Church goes on, now.
o So Paul
also goes on, after his own syllable 94, in Eph1:5a,
o which
94, tracked what-if-the-Rapture UP TO
the pre-Church expected date of the Millennium under
Daniel's metered accounting (our 94
or even 97AD):
o forecast,
ever since Moses. For 5250 from Adam's
Fall, is 94AD. [Again, we've that 3-year discrepancy in our BC/AD calendars
that I can't simply fix by slapping on 3 years to AD. I'd have to move the entire timeline from
Adam forward 3 years, and then you couldn't vet the BC dates I use, in
scholarly sources. I did the entire timeline
ONLY using Bible, first. Then, got the
BC/AD derivation, from Temple Fall, which nearly every scholar dates at 586BC
(with rounding problems); Bible concords
with that 'fit', and so does Paul, using '94 sevens'
as his anaphora sum (green highlights).
The resulting other BC/AD dates fit with conventional scholarship from
50 years ago. There has been much Bible
dating incompetence in the last 50 years.
So I use BC/AD chronology you can track in tomes from 50-150 years ago,
when scholars were less constrained to be politically-correct. See Roman Chronology
problems, too. Three extra
years offset by 3 years excluded, is self-canceling: so some dates
coincide.]
Here's how Paul traces the
future chronologically, after syllable 94. We must review the nesting we just saw, to
distinguish his clever benchmarking.
Again, here's the entire meter pattern of Ephesians 1:3-14, focusing on
the 91 'nests'. The corresponding cumulative syllable numbers are in blue. (I hope this looks aligned, on
your computer!)
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238
252 301 308
343 434
Notice
that the first nested 91
started at the first 21. Now notice the text at the end of that 21: we
are pronounced to be holy and blameless.
We saw that was a clever play on 77, so
it's apt to say that at the end of the 77, the Rapture could have occurred. So for us, a new '91' would have
begun. Eternally.
At the 77, we're
still within the original Millennial schedule, so Paul next benchmarks
to 84, tying to Psalm 90:4, as shown earlier. 84 also = 50 years after Christ's actual
death (beginning of the 51st year, technically); under
the Daniel timeline, that period (in ellipsis) would
have played next, had Israel accepted Christ.
She didn't, and He died 7 years early; so 84 was still a potential
benchmark based on when He did die. So
in Paul's accounting here, between Christ's 84th and 91st year (get the
pun on 91) -- the Rapture would have been
within the original deadline, even including Church.
Of
course, if we didn't mature (and we didn't), then
the Rapture wouldn't occur, and the ENTIRE
'91' would have a different meaning, a new voting time, 21+70
as shorthand for the new 1050. (So it looks like we should subtract 3 from
our AD dates, rather than add 3, but that doesn't work rightly, either. I don't yet know how to fix the problem.)
So we
start over with a new 21, maybe
'get it right this time'.
Therefore, Paul's 21 still means Temple Building, but now
like Israel's rebuilding, ours got delayed.
So our next stop is syllable 94, the outside
expected date, per the old Schedule.
That is, if Church Matured
On Time. And if she didn't by 94,
then maybe by 105, which completes another
21, still stressing Temple
Building.
This
next 21 is really a 28
(7+21), if Church continues; for the prior 7 which should
have been the Tribulation, presumably fails. For scheduled Gentile time pre-Church,
was 50; again, 33+50=83, so beginning year 84 Anno Domini, was
the ideal year of Church completion, per old schedule. So if 84 fails, Church has another shot at
21; but now it sums 28 (7+21), sign of previous flunk.
Notice
how in each clause, the text ties to a Rapture occurrence, severally. Each clause can stand on its own, poetically.
After
syllable 105, is the
first eudokian clause, end verse 5. If Church lasted that long, she flunked Temple
Building twice. So instead of a 21, the
preceding flunk requires 28, after
the 105 mark. Same accounting as
Isaiah's, debiting 28 from his 490 tally in Isaiah 53. And, had we Matured
instead, look: first epainon beginning verse 6: we'd praise the Glory of His Grace. In Person.
Now
notice that first epainon phrasing in verse 6 -- closing
the paragraph at 28 and 133,
respectively -- is generic, no stress on us AS the Glory of His
Grace, like verse 12. Paul knows Rapture
won't likely happen then. That's his
point. See, the Rapture is a body count criterion, as Paul will
explain, in Ephesians 4:12-16. Depends
on Church maturation to reflect Christ's own maturity, Eph4:13. So if Church went on that much longer,
there would be far more babies (Eph 4:14), than developed kings. Three more generations, to be precise. So as John would write in 96AD, Paul knew Rapture wouldn't happen on the old schedule.
Meter Note j Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So
note this well: the OPPORTUNITY COST of
all that delay, got much bigger. A
kingdom isn't perfect, if its society is imbalanced with too many kiddies. So time must continue much longer. Thus Paul sets up his first eudokian
bookend, on how God will profit His Son, despite delay. Again, Paul wants to stop date-setters from
drooling -- they slobbered over Temple
Down -- and instead, get them to focus on CHRIST. Same problem as we have today. It's okay to smile, now. The
whole point of Paul's meter is to remind believers that Rapture means GROW UP NOW, not drool like the Left
Behind nutters.
You are
to live every day as if Rapture can happen, since it can; you have no idea how many more kings are
needed to complete Church -- and what if YOU are to be one of them? What if the Rapture happens because YOU
mature? You don't know if you're the
LAST king to mature, do you. For God intended every believer to have the wealth
of the King, Ephesians 1:3d, en pasei eulogiai pneumatikei. So
you should focus on growing.
At the
same time you don't fret over Rapture, as the Thessalonians. The problem continued for them, as it does
for us. About 11 years later, Peter
encountered similar tension with believers, 2Peter3:9, so reprimanded them that
the Lord is NOT slow on His Promise.
Peter wrote 1 and 2 Peter from Babylon to Paul's audience (end 1Peter),
which was under the control of Parthia; Peter wrote due to and just after
Paul's 66-syllable mark here, had ended; for Paul had just been executed by
Nero, so Peter knew he soon would die. [Rome had just defeated
Parthia, with the latter constrained to tow the line. So Christian persecution stepped up in the
wake of Burning Rome, for which Christians were blamed. Paul was a casualty of the ensuing
persecution, in 'our' 68 or very early 69AD, kicking off the Year of the Four
Emperors.]
John,
of course, had no end of problems with believer defections, since when he
wrote, the Temple had been destroyed for a generation; the final pre-Church
Millennial '94' deadline came, yet no Rapture:
expected, at least seven years prior.
Ergo John writes, in 1John 2; and
of course above all, in 2 John and the sad biography of the seven
representative churches, in Revelation 1-3.
Thus new information was provided re eschatology, with the
double-door Rapture event itself in Revelation
4:1, undated; followed by, the Tribulation and Millennial sequences,
completing the Book -- told in Greek drama style, especially via trendy
choruses and mimes of Domitian's day (Rev 9, 11, 12, 13). Mimes, which burlesqued Christians.
The
defectors, became today's preterists and Replacement-theology believers. Truly easy to trace that changeover in the
so-called 'Church Father' writings, which are anti-semitic, bilious. So apostate, one hopes that the actual
writers weren't the people named as the authors (and of
course many scholars think the writers are much later). Just read their self-righteous vocabulary,
akin to goofball fake gospel of Peter, etc.
Bring Pepto-Bismol.
Paul
anticipated all of this. Satan did, too.
Some demon incited the Jews to petition Hadrian to rebuild the Temple. Hadrian refused, and that spawned what we
call the Bar Kochba rebellion, starting in 132AD. By 140 AD, Jerusalem will be razed, rebuilt
as a pagan Aelia Capitolina, replete with pig temple standing over the Holy
of Holies. Abomination, anyone?
So
beginning with the first eudokian clause at the end of verse 5, and the
first epainon clause in verse 6, Paul keeps up an annual tracking, but
now shifts to focus on the assets. For a Greek reader would know by those
clauses, that Paul bids him disregard Rapture drooling, in favor of.. eis
epainon. For a reader who cares
about God, wants a 'good report' when he reaches the Bema, which of course
happens immediately upon the Rapture.
So here's the pattern again, picking up now at syllable 147.
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238
252 301 308
343 434
At
syllable 147, we've gone another 14
syllables=years, in the conventional metric style. Now we end the first '91'. That's shorthand in Mosaic style, for both an annual
chronology (from 56-after-Christ), but also, shorthand for a whole
1050. For Moses used 70's as sabbatical
shorthand for 1050; but now that the Gentiles are grafted in, and
evocative of the total number of years Israel's sabbatical observance BOUGHT
for the Gentiles, Paul updates the 70, to 91. Clever, huh.
So Paul
in effect says, even if the Rapture happens 1050 years from when he writes,
we are still in the Beloved, and graced out, even while down here. The 14,
stresses nexus -- for
Christ is the NEXUS of History;
the '91' ends with Him, and of course his own 14 ended
IN Him -- seven years owed on His Own Life, and the other seven as the
Tribulation -- hence Paul's clever verse
6 close, en toi agapemenoi. And
had Church raptured up by then, it would be poetically timely, for that 91 is
+70 after, 77 (56+21). Vote Successful.
Meter Note j Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238
252 301 308
343 434
Our
next stop is 28 syllables later, at the 175 total;
here Paul benchmarks Moses again. Notice
first, that Paul repeated the 28, since
its theme is, repeat the time flunked. Paul first benchmarked Moses, Isaiah and
Daniel at their own syllable 133's,
which closed the first 28
paragraph, of Paul's own meter. Here's
what those passages said:
o
Daniel 9:7,
technically ending at syllable 182, but Daniel uses differences between,
to tag Isaiah 53:2's ending; so the
difference is 133. Daniel 9:7 essentially reads, To You, God,
all Righteousness; but to us, shame-of-face this day: to all Israel, wherever
she is, near or far, living in Jerusalem or scattered around the world as you'd
sent her for her disobedience.
o
Isaiah 53:2's
similarly reads, No Sight of Him, will we desire, ending at his own
syllable 133.
o
Psalm 90:7, is an Adamic-period
testimony. It
reads, For we end in Your Anger; in
your wrath, we are apoplectic; again ending at his own syllable 133.
o
Paul's syllable 133 thus
antiphonally reads, eis epainon doxzes tes charitos autou. Redemption of the Judgment: thus answers
all prior text in each of the three OT passages, all the way back to Adam. Meaning? Romans 8:28, God will make it work
to Glorify His Son. Covering both the
Jews, and the Gentiles. Both near and
far, wherever they were or are, God Works Out Everything, and Glorifies His
Son. Clever use of meter, huh. Tells you concurrently the trend of future
history (same ol' same ol'), as well as what God does (hooray). Just as Daniel recited, too.
o
So now, in syllable 175, we
have the same style of play, but only Moses is tagged. (The
175's in Daniel or Isaiah are on the very same topic, but their clauses don't
end at that point; leaving some of the sin, 'outside'. So, they are not tagged,
here.)
o
Psalm 90:9 is
the Noahic testimony. It reads, For
all our days turn in your fury (play on 'Hebrew' =
"overflow", which Dan 9:11 plays on: we hebrewed away from your
Torah) -- all our years, with a
groaning sigh. Yeah, ending at syllable 175.
o
So notice how Paul's syllable 175
clause, 'responds', end Ephesians 1:7:
ten aphesin twn paraptwmatwn. Is that clever, or what! So we're still groaning, alright, but sighing
with relief! Ahhhh, forgiven! Flooded, still.. with Forgiveness! Instead of killing waters, Living Waters! The world's story, meanwhile, hasn't changed
since the Flood.
o
Notice that started a new 91, in Ephesians
1:7, and this new paragraph ends with aphesin, the third clause of the
verse. So Paul's 175
marker, completes a 28, not a
21, again making up for the previous flunk. And, had the Rapture then occurred, how apt:
for we'd be in our new perfect natures, holy and blameless. The Ultimate Forgiveness, applied. In other words, believer, forget
date-setting; concentrate instead on growing up; so YOU can get this relief,
don't end your own years, groaning! Believers in Paul's day, knew this
syllable-counting technique. Paul has
already made many tagging references, so believers are tracking to all three
passages. So they'd get this doctrinal
message, loud and clear.
Now we're
in the last clause of Ephesians 1:7, and instead of repeating a 28 again,
Paul doubles it to the famous 56. Warning Bill Robinson, Trouble Ahead. Yeah, no kidding. Commodus would soon come to power, ending the
Antonines. Within a generation later, what
we call the RCC would form. Church would
then have lived for double the initially-scheduled 50 years for the goyim
pre-Church, plus the failed-to-occur, Rapture
(84*2+7). So if we flunked the 28 yet
again, the 'price' of delay, goes far higher.
The 56, made even more pregnant by the fact the initial 56
represented Christ; His own 56 completed with the 14 owed Him -- but us? Um, it's not as if God didn't give us enough
assets. How depressing.
So Paul
now ends Eph 1:7 -- kata to ploutos tes
charitos autou -- reminding the reader of verse 5's doxzes tes charitos autou,
stressing RICHES. For again,
the huge cost of all those added souls to be made Church, with too many of them
babies, requires Church continue.
It's good news for the world, in a way.
But the SIZE of the cost! Christ had to pay on the Cross! So the Asset He Became and thus BOUGHT,
means.. We are ever more apostate and
hence expensive, each generation we live.
Meter Note j Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238
252 301 308
343 434
Accordingly,
verse 7 had listed the second and third eudokian
assets, apolutrwsin and aphesin, Paul having kicked off the list
with the most astonishing asset, epainon, back in verse 6. Note by the end of verse 5 with eudokian,
he abandoned tracking to Rapture dates;
they'd all been passed. So in verse 7,
the reader's attention is on The Lord Jesus Christ.
So this
next paragraph thus ends 56 syllables
later in verse 9 at 231, with
the second eudokian clause.
Notice next that this paragraph is about what? musterion. The Thinking of Christ was Hidden from
history, prior, since He hadn't yet Come.
So Paul tags no OT passages.
Instead, he stresses Church has
His Thinking, though here in his timeline, Church is in a state
of vote short.
231: the
Lord would have been 231 years old, 33 sevens.
That's a poetic time for Rapture, right?
Okay, so the next 7
syllables, ending verse 9 at 238
syllables, presume a Rapture at the
beginning, and Trib over by the end.
Here, he brings back the tie to the Jews.
First
ponder the wry last clause of verse 9:
if Raptured at that point, we'd have been proetheto'd = set
before Him, even as He was set before us. Sea of Glass, later coded in Revelation 4,
but first coded by Paul in 1Corinthians 13:12, 2Cor3:18. Of course, that was the face-shining update
on end Numbers 6, Moses having to wear a veil because his own face shone from
seeing God face-to-face. [Exod. 34:29f, 35; Matt. 17:2]
Since proetheto
is a technical word -- offering food to God -- it evokes OT practice. Of course, if we had been Raptured up at that
point, we'd see the OT people face-to-face, too. Real Temple observances, this time,
Revelation 4. And there we are, presented before the Throne of His
Grace, at the Bema, sea of glass getting our rewards or demotions.
Here Paul tags syllable 238 in Psalm
90:12, Moses' own testimony: make us know how to number our days, and
have hearts of wisdom. It
was a very famous line. Of course, the
whole Psalm was on that subject, metered.
Paul, using the same meter for the same panoramic purpose.. tags Psalm
90:12.
So if not raptured yet, we've got this Preview Of Coming Distractions, so we
know Church is Going Down. Paul counts the years, for us. So we know when
it goes down. Starting, back when he
doubled the 28's: when Commodus came to
power. For as soon as John was
exiled, Roman apostates got busy -- they didn't even wait to see if he'd be
released -- 1Clement made a bid to usurp the Corinthians, while John wrote
Revelation. Starting then, entrenching
about 100 years later, under Commodus.
Interest in the Bible's Greek had declined; only religious 'elites', studied it. A translation was preferred.. or no Bible at
all.
Yeah,
count your syllables to count your days, with or without Rapture, for each day
counts! But Christendom had settled into a comfortable
anti-semitism. If there was any doctrine
the Jews espoused -- like Hebrew meter, for example -- it MUST be a lie. So high the antipathy, Passover would be
masked: now you can't count three
days and three nights. So those
folks weren't counting the meter here, or they'd see themselves. And repent.
And,
were we Raptured then, we'd have those hearts of wisdom, New Covenant
realized for all of Church. The Trib
believers suffering below, will exactly know how to number Israel's days: start
counting the days when you see the Two Witnesses in Jerusalem telling
everyone the Trib has begun. Then day
1222-1267, if not before, you GET OUT of Jerusalem, difference between
1290 and 1335, in Daniel 12. For the
Witnesses will be killed on day 1260, Rev11. That leaves a week for the aftermath of the
earthquake; to compensate for
loss-of-face, the government will swiftly install a talking statue on the
Holy of Holies, Rev 13.
We are
the Bridge to their Time and the Blessing By Association to their Time, since
no Church will be on earth and no covenanted-Israel, either. 1Kings 9 is still in breach, until the Second
Advent. So for them to be able to count
their days, we'd better count ours, so we grow up and thus constitute a
post-mortem blessing to them. (My
pastor stressed that bold text, when teaching Ephesians.)
Meter Note j Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 nested 91's
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238
252 301 308
343 434
Of
course, if the Rapture didn't even happen by now, well.. what encore? Why should Time continue? How
about, to Defeat Satan in the Trial
via Church, using Her to Bridge Time?
So Paul launches into that, next. He'd hit the readers between the eyes with
the first eudokian and epainon
clauses back in verses 5-6.
He'd then launched into the epainon asset,
the Redemption Asset, the Forgiveness
Asset, RICHES the strong theme, end verse 7; he continued it with the all-wisdom-and-clear-thinking
asset, much epainon'd by Greeks, verse 8; then above all, the Hidden
Now Revealed to them, Christ; so what need to drool over the
Rapture, verse 9; so he'd appropriately
closed verse 9 with the second eudokian
bookend, and whapped them between the eyes with a hypothetical proetheto Rapture, end verse 9.
So
their own eyes now, at the beginning of verse 10, envision Standing
Before Him. Yikes. With all those assets, did we grow UP? Yeah.
That's exactly how he wants them to think, for verse 10.
So now he hits them with Wrap up
Estate Management of Time itself.
Give Birth to Time. Get
drooling about that.
Verse
10 is 14 syllables, a nexus,
ending at syllable 252 outside the 91's, as
you can see above. Time. All Time.
Parallel to the Lord's own 14. We saw in Pregnancy
1b, that up to verse 10 Paul also depicted verses 7-9, as Christ down here, Himself Built Up in
the very Assets Paul lists, with Forgiveness as His Attitude; not Him naming
sins, but rather forgiving them as they occurred, especially against Him. So He was The Nexus Of History, so
it's appropriate that His Body, Wrap Up Time.
And
they better get drooling; for by using 14, Paul
tells them that year 239-252 might
be the End of Time. Church will be that low
on votes. We look back now, whew. But whoever voted then, they were stars.
Maybe a washerwoman or a duke.
Only one was needed: just one
Abraham, Noah, Moses. Someone unknown, though;
Satan won't let the mature, obtain first-class press. Only retards stumble on fame, in this world.
So what
was going on, back then? For the Romans
it was a time of great instability, as one general or senator after the next
tried on the purple; typically helping
to remove, the guy he replaced. So few
Christians matured; Lev 26 and
Deut 28 say that when we grow, times are good. They weren't good. So we weren't growing. Religion was entrenched in North Africa, the
Mediterranean. Religion profits from
instability: always childish, and run by
children.
Have a
peek at what Paul presaged by 14 = Time might End Here, if your copy of Gibbon isn't handy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_of_the_Third_Century
. Rehearsal for the Dark Ages.
Those
are historical trends of a four-generation flunk (four
28's). Paul was the worst sinner in
history per his own testimony to Timothy, 1Tim1:15. Yet he supermatured in 68-44AD, 24
years. Yet we don't. So, there's Housecleaning. It 'plays' as war, migration, invasion,
disease, even prosperity; due to upheaval, people make money from the misery.
This
Time Wrap-up Verse warrants OT tagging to accentuate meaning. After all, maybe God told Paul
of apostate Christians claiming Dispensationalism a fabrication of the 19th
centu-ray; claiming too, that some woman
then invented 'Rapture'; never mind the Old Latin Bible translated
1Thess4:17 with rapto for Greek harpazw. The Big Rape. Snatch Up.
So,
Paul tags syllable 252
in Daniel, Isaiah, Moses. Paul timed his syllables for just this
purpose. For,
o
Differential
syllable 252 in Daniel 9:13,
represents the year he prays, which
o
Isaiah wrote and Daniel used as a stopwatch, seven syllables = years = hifph'gi into last clause of Isaiah 53:6 aka 538 bc since
o
Moses' syllable 252 was
his own vote during his own voting period, Psalm 90:13: Return, Oh
Lord! How Long! Have Mercy on Your servants.
So, He did. Each of
these voters saved Time. Everyone knew
that. So Paul pegs syllable 252, reminding his readers What Time it is. Time to
Vote. Time Hangs On How You Vote. No Moses vote, no Exodus. No Isaiah vote, no Book of Isaiah to tell us
What Time it is, so there'd be no Israel, post-Manasseh. No Daniel vote, no Temple, no Israel, no
Messiah, and we'd never exist.
Meter Note j Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238
252 301 308
343 434
So when
Paul writes verse 10 to match this climactic syllable 252
reference, eis oikonomian tou pleromatos twn kairwn -- using
culturally-evocative words of pregnancy and a cannibalistic Chronos -- the
readers were probably stunned. Think about it:
o
You get all these assets developed in Christ Himself, now to be
developed in you;
o
You get to know Him more intimately than any other believer in
the past;
o
And as if that weren't enough, your own development will be used
To Wrap Up Time. Bring it to Birth (pleromatos).
So if you
were a fishmonger sitting in the congregation while the teacher read and
explained the letter via his 'gift of knowledge' or 'faith' (both
meaning of Canon, before it was all
written down), your jaw would drop and everyone would smell your fish-breath.
The senator (let's say) hosting the
gathering would tear his toga as a gesture of humility, but more as a way to
release his own shock; the veiled women
would wail or cheer at the pleroma analogy, see, you men can become
pregnant, too; and of course any of
the huffy religious types in the audience -- which had to be large, this was a
letter from PAUL -- well, the religious types would stomp off, freshly armed
with new accusations against that heretical Jew formerly of their clan, hoping G-d keep him in prison till he rots. One
thing you would not be, is neutral.
Obviously
many questions would ensue. Paul
anticipated them in the balance of verse 10, via an eight-syllable Head word; Paul next sweepingly classes
the Trial issues Wrapped Up by Church
Time. All of which are under the Head of
the Body -- remember 1 Cor12, people! --
Everything In Heaven,
Everything On Earth. Is
that Trial Scope big enough, ya think?
Enough to stop you from drooling
over whether that new military coup in Rome, presages Rapture?
(Claudius had been poisoned; a young Nero now ruled.)
Notice
that verse 10b commences a new 91. It runs a pregnant 49
syllables; it terminates, with the dramatic second of the Temple
Trio, prothesin. By
its end we're at syllable=year 301 from
Christ's Birth. 43 sevens. Likelihood of
Rapture at this point is almost zero -- or almost 100% -- because a Church lasting that long is way too
full of babies devoured by false doctrine.
Which we know from history, for this is the time of Empire fracture,
tenuously held together by Diocletian; during 306-311 there were eight designated
emperors, in a desperate bid to keep Roman armies and factions, united. The
eventual winner, was Constantine.
Persecution of Christians was at an all-time high. Because, we weren't growing; so Satan got
to mess with us. We were quite
numerous, enough to bug everyone with our piety. Enough apostate, for Constantine to use in a
bid for political power, and thus create the Harlot of Revelation 17. So indeed, Time could End. The Temple Rebuilding gambit of Revelation 11
was just about to play again, once Constantine came to power; for Constantine
apparently had some desire to rebuild it.
That desire would recur in his successors. Fake Church, Fake Temple, stage for
Tribulation set. Satan had a good
thing going.
So Paul
switches from 56, to 49. To remind readers of the Diaspora Israel
incurred due to her apostasy, prompting Daniel's prayer in that 49th year, back
at syllable 252, already tagged. In
short, Paul presumes Church will keep flunking, ergo a new 91.
So
syllable 301, is a bad report card. Church
Flunk. Contrast between the High
Purpose, and our bad report. Of course,
history well corroborates this outcome.
By the 4th century AD, Christianity had fixed into what we now call,
'catholic'. Paul treats Church in a Diaspora, herself. Hence 49. Accruing only a 7, here; since that 7 still stands for Trib, Rapture is now
depicted as due to believer failure.
In any failure period, a few spiritual giants always are created, viz.,
Daniel. So indeed the right number
of kings can still mature, at which point the balloon goes up and Trib begins. [This is not to single out Catholicism as the
lone apostasy. There were many
forms of apostasy, which is Paul's point.
Just so happens that the 'catholic' flavor won political dominance, and
was the most anti-semitic.]
So Paul here creates a Bad-Church Rapture Cause scenario, again setting up
Ephesians 4:13 versus 4:14. Showing the
two sides of 'Rapture', a) when we mature enough, and b) when we don't. The prothesin takes into account both
a) and b) options. So in either event,
the Rapture will happen; but it can
happen due to Church maturing en masse, or due to the mass apostasy, but the
kings nonetheless mature. Our
Choice.
This is
the flipside of our high position and assets.
God will still work it out. The
Body will still Complete. But each one
of us as individuals, how will we Vote for God?
With everlasting, post-salvation consequences. Paul thus reminds the readers of 1Cor3.
Meter
Note j
Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238
252 301 308
343 434
Are you
surprised that Paul's next stop is syllable 308, verse
11c, God Works out all things, theme of Romans 8? 44 sevens?
Pregnant number of testing? If the Rapture didn't happen at that point,
well.. God voted. Notice that it will be
followed by 35. Do you remember what 7+35
is? GENERATION
BUILDING. Specifically, the 9th
generation's beginning (count as a generation, each
number over 21, or add two contiguous numbers to get 21+, like 14+28 ). What was it God said back in Leviticus, how
you don't eat from the first four crop years but from the fifth, when
you enter the Land, Leviticus 19:23ff, 23:10ff?
Back-ended harvest! Us!
Switch
now to 35= half of a vote, God's.
It begins in verse 11d, kicked off by the last eudokian clause,
which kicks off the second epainon clause, which kicks off the third
Temple Trio. Triple-play! Yet Church is still in toilet-training,
by Christ's 308th birthday. And still is, by his 343rd
Birthday, the end of the 35,
ending with proelpikotas.
Toilet
Temple = Church is easily proven from history: look at the many fake Gospels
pandered, silly practices, rituals, stories, visions, dreams, pictures, all
doo-dooing in that horrible Constantinian era!
People disdaining Bible, so stupid about what it says they even debate
whether Christ is God, or God is Trinity???
Instead, killing each other in the Circus Maximus, sitting on poles or
mountains like hermits (oooohhhhmmm here), starving themselves to 'suffer like
Jesus', all manner of goofy observances.. and they called themselves holy! Who's worse?
The Greek Orthodox brand of silliness, or the Roman? The anti-semitism is dripping
from Chrysostom, soon to be born.
He sure stayed a baby, too.
Look at
the bilious writings of the Church Fathers or the Greek Orthodox mystics, throw-up-here! They quoted Bible as if it were diarrhea,
and didn't seem to understand a word in it! Come on:
can't you guys count to THREE?
Mary a perpetual virgin? James allegedly living inside the Temple,
unwashed? John running screaming from a
bathhouse at what had to be age 110 or later, because a heretic was bathing? Bible never says he left Patmos, and he
had to be nearly age 100 when there. The
list of their silly fables goes on and on in the Patristics. Yeah, fathers of doo-doo!
I'm
slowly making a Youtube playlist on these guys, but it's mostly audio, still;
called PopeMyth (PopeM as moniker), which you can access on Youtube. Video descriptions have the audio as links. Better still, read the Church Fathers
yourself, in their own chatty words, see what Scriptural dolts they were --
assuming they actually wrote the tripe pandered in their names. You can't praise those writings with a straight
face or honesty. You must be a hypocrite,
a liar or just plain stupid, to praise that junk. Religious people like it. They have no discernment.
The
'catholic' flavor, whether Eastern or Western, was by no means the only flavor
of apostasy. By this meter, Paul shows
why the Rapture doesn't happen; or if it did happen, that christian failure would trigger
it. Religiosity substitutes for Bible
learning and living; frankly all the denominations are infected with it, not
merely the 'catholic' brands. When
Christians make a stink of their subgroup -- just as Paul warned back in 1
Corinthians 1:11-13 -- they manifestly become a demon nation; Christianity
itself becomes a series of competing football teams. Learning is not pooled; theological advance stagnates;
inter-Christian pogroms occur, instead.
Thus has been our history. That's
why Time continues. And, why it will
end.
God
will make it all work out anyway. God
Will Keep Voting, though Church Will Not. That's the story Paul tells, at this
point: the trends of Church history. So Revelation 1-3, is already proverbial to
those familiar with Paul's meter. But
not, to us. The few then get
harvested, from this point forward; so Paul also switches -- in a triple play of trebled or seven-metered anaphora -- to the last of the
Temple Trio by the end of that 35, proelpikotas.
The few. In front. The early crop who matured. Individuals.
My
pastor didn't know about this meter, but he harped constantly on the subject
matter you've just read. He got it from
the text, which of course, one can. He
kept on reminding us that only the kings
need be developed for the Rapture to occur. All this, from Ephesians. He called those maturing, 'spiritual
atlases', and 'invisible heroes', and unlike anyone else I can find anywhere,
he spent 12 whopping years developing the exact mechanics of the spiritual life
you can live and use daily, and test how
you're growing. [My
'Spiritual Maturation Process' videos summarize that 12-year material. Some folks who've heard it and are under the
same pastor, claim it's accurate. But any summary is nothing like the original. Go get his 1992 Spiritual Dynamics, see for
yourself.]
Meter Note j Paul's Chronology Meter, cont. Go to: ChronoChart Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
56 + 21+ 7
+ 21 + 28 + 14
+ 28 + 56 + 7 + 14 +
49 +
7 + 35 + 91 (nested 91's)
56 77 84 105 133 147
175 231 238 252
301 308 343
434
Have
you noticed, Paul uses the same future-history meter tracking style as in
Isaiah 53, yet Paul does not individually tag the OT syllables, anymore? He's always in the general 'vicinity' of the
chronological-meter-use of Temple Down,
in each Daniel, Isaiah and Moses; but
the syllable benchmarks don't match, now.
Always one or two off. You can
guess what that means, right? Church is
off-track! Daniel did the same thing
with his meter: always 1 or 2 away of being divisible by seven. Check it out, if you haven't already: http://www.brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.pdf
So Paul
now STOPS subdividing meter. God's '35' vote
ends it: ends verse 12 at the 343
syllable mark, stressing that it's all about the proelpikotas,
now. End of tagging, end of
subdividing, end of the third 91. So all those hyping the era of
Constantine, will be embarrassed at this bad
report card from God. Scripture
already defined itself as Canon, it didn't need human help. Still, that tells you how bad things were,
that people had to argue over what IS Canon, too. And, they did take some care to preserve it, but
I'm sorry, Constantine ordering 50 copies isn't nearly enough. The idea was to garner control, anyway. To say who was the 'official Christianity',
and confiscate the opposition's texts, etc.
It was not the salutary time we've been sold. So much for their unwarranted pride over that
time. It's disgusting, how we
Christians laud what God condemns.
The
final, poignant 91,
verses 13 and 14 inclusive, tell us Which God is Voting, too. The Spirit. So while Church Corporate repeats its
babyhood theology generation after generation, revealing just How High A Salvation Cost Christ
must have paid on the Cross -- a cost we
don't even know, since we think Matthew 16:18 is about popes! Is there a bigger insult to Christ, than
that?
The
Spirit meanwhile develops the few adults.
Many more babies are born during this time, so more adults are needed;
that's why Paul ends the passage at 434 syllables,
Daniel's 62nd week. Because, we're
still in it.
o
That's why Paul -- imitating Daniel -- begins praying, in verse
15.
o
Like Daniel, Paul first set up a metered section which is
56 syllables short, showing Time
Critical;
o
like Daniel, Paul crafted nested legal paragraphs and a
chronology via meter, which goes full-circle;
o
like Daniel, Paul's words on the surface sound all nice and churchy
about how Good God is to us --
o
but as you can see by now, that summary of God's Grace is
likewise an indictment.
o
God Faithful, we Faithless. Same theme as Daniel's.
o
Like Isaiah, Paul did a full annual chronology from start point
to end point, and of course the end is a beginning.
o
Like Isaiah and Moses, Paul crafted his meter in palindromes,
with more combinations than shown in this document (I always miss some); the palindromic nature of the meter, matches
the palindromic nature of the text, in all three passages. In English, it seems too vague. But when you know the underlying meter tracks to actual time, you see the
dual-entendre, realize each clause is a statement
about that time. Then you know,
what time it is.
o
So like all of them, Paul tags back to another passage at its
syllable count, whether symbolic number or actual number or aggregate number or
differential number (the latter, done by Daniel) -- always balancing to
what?
o
490, since it's still true someone must supermature, in
order for Time to Continue.
o
And for Church, when the
day comes that not even one believer will vote for God.. the Rapture happens.
o
See: 'Rapture' is not a happy thing. It happens due to our apostasy. We should be properly afraid, and GROW UP.
Ephesians
1:15-23 are an open prayer, my pastor kept reminding us -- there's no
'Amen', until 3:19 -- so the Eph1 prayer
either doesn't close at all.. or
doesn't close until Ephesians 3:19. In
between, are the Two Walls, the 'mystery', Paul's explanation of the changeover. Two Walls.
Not one. Two Covenants. Meanwhile, 90% of Christianity claims we took
over Israel, not reading Ephesians and Hebrews very well. Or maybe, not wanting to. People like their 'traditional' lies.
For as
Paul proves here and the writer of Hebrews says in Hebrews 11:1 and :39-40, WE
ARE THE TRIAL. WE ARE ON TRIAL. JUST AS CHRIST WAS. So Time is to be Bridged by Church. God the Holy Spirit will make it happen, and
at the end He will Cause each of the proelpikotas in each generation to
become The Very Glory of Him, verse 14, eis epainon tes doxzes autou.
Only then, in the final quarter
of the Year of Church,
however many years of quarters it takes -- in that '91', the Rapture will occur.
Not until.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
SOURCES: Atlas Bury Church
Fathers DioCassius Eusebius Eutropius
Geog
(Rome) Gibbon Jerome Josephus Lanciani
(geog) Latin texts
Livy's History Magistri
Mommsen
Provinces NiebuhrVol1-3 Philo Bk 40 Platner
(geog) Pliny Jr. Plutarch Porphyry Rome's
Fake Authors Roman
Fasti recon Roman
plebs Socrates of Const. Seneca
Suetonius Tacitus
Theodoret Aurelius Victor Zosimus Z in
Greek/Latin [Note: other
sources are linked passim in Chart. Data conflict, so read several
sources. Chart links same name to multiple
sites, i.e., Chaps. VIII+ of Lactantius' Persecutors Died is
goofy; seek other
4th-century writers, too. My videos
on Paul's meter-mapping-to-history technique:
click here,
start with 11a in the list. I would
appreciate your input or corrections!]
CHART NAVIGATION:
Conclusions Appendix I on anaphora timelines Appendix II on Diocletian's Death Date
ChronoChart V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147
V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283
V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434
Interpretation Notes
¨
Period is per Paul's own
metered use of Anno Domini dates.
Since Paul tracks to 'our' calendar so accurately -- same style as
Daniel 9:4-13 benchmark Israel's kings
--
¨
Rulers or Events here are listed 'raw' from our common bc/ad dates for those same years,
UNadjusted. I should always get a
3-6 year swing versus Paul's numbers.. but don't. Why?
Paul datelines his writing (verse 4, first clause) as
near or on, Christ's 56th birthday; which means,
the beginning of his 57th year the prior Chislev, or the following April
(OT regnal years begin in Nisan). If Paul wrote just after imprisonment in
Jerusalem, 56 fits; Tychicus could bring the letter later, the
postscript ending Ephesians, written then. For here in Eph 1, all other years track to
'our' bc/ad, i.e., Caligula came
to power in 'our' 37 AD. So I used 'our'
dates. Finally, Roman AUC problems
date back to the 300's bc. A 3-year error added by Romans, offset by 3-year
error subtracted by Mom Church, is self-canceling:
so some dates coincide.
¨
Key Words and meter are
classically used to wryly describe each period. As in all OT prophecy, esp. Psalm 90, Isaiah
53, Daniel 9, even Roman and Greek drama, Paul too selects double-entendres, to
link (i.e., future) history beneath words. to get
the wit, interpret: you must thoroughly
know the history.
Paul's
wordplay bites, i.e., 'Father' also alludes to Augustus, Eph1:3. Augustus was deified, hence kurios (at
syllable=year 14, when Augustus died). Some allusions are obscure, sarcastic play on
Scripture. So yellow
highlights in the chart below, denote historical connections: keywords form wry chapter titles for the
period covered by a clause.
For Christians
in Paul's day were long accustomed to wry allusions, so would have been alert
to keywords for the 'future', as time passed. Such allusions were key features of all pagan
oracles, too. So the style was well
understood. Alas, Christians didn't long
pass that alertness onto their progeny, so we Christians today are woefully
ignorant. But Bible scholars well know
its usage. They just don't realize it's
a) tied to meter, and b) used prophetically in NT books other than
Revelation. Even Revelation, they
allegorize away: a sad sloppy precedence from Origen, forward.
Note
well: in Greek, Paul's words
could have been differently phrased, or presented in a different order, yet
have the same meaning. So the word
order deliberately ties to future history, after Paul wryly recaps the
past. The recap sets tone and alerts the
reader how to read the rest of the passage.
Paul's wit is sarcastic and biting, just as in Mark, Luke, James, John
and famous Greco-Roman plays. Bible text
has always used such a style. Its
purpose is instructive, even as drama has always been: stacks of meaning layers to show the
interplay between heaven, and earth.
Tells you how meanings FIT
TOGETHER; omnidirectional linkages of doctrines.
The
Play: How Salt-Of-The-Earth Church, Causes History For Better and
Worse. Paul's theme: Progressively Worse. So bad, that by Constantine's day only God
Votes Positive. Thus Paul alerts
Christians that Rapture won't happen for a long time, even though it can happen
any day. John's Revelation
talks back to this timeline, explains why Rapture
didn't happen as expected by 91 or 'our' 94 AD, per the pre-Church
schedule. (Rev 1:1-3 is dramatic prologue,
metered. Verse 1 is 58 syllables, dated
from Christ's age at death = 91. It's
divisible by 7 @verse 2, 84 syllables = Psalm 90:4; Judaea had been a province for 84 years, in
91AD; the same year was 26 years after
Florus became (the last) procurator = verse 2's syllables, alone. Rev 1:3 is also divisible by 7, @42. Total = 126, pregnant 70+56, playing off
'year': 365+126=490. 126=42 threes, or
18 sevens. Paul uses 18 sevens as
first bookend of eudokian anaphora; John
intercepts it. Paul's syllable 126 is eis
epainon doxzes. The epainon phrase ends at 133, but since John is
GIVING the Good Report, he cuts it at 126, to tie to Isaiah 53:1. He did the
same tie, in 1John1:2,3,5. Isaiah used
42 as his dateline, in the meter of Isaiah 1:1 and 52:13+14, which begins
Chapter 53 in Hebrew. Finally,
91+42=133, the end of Paul's 1st epainon
anaphora, when the Bar Kochba rebellion would occur.)
Verse |
Syllab |
Cum Syllab |
Key Word(s) |
Period (AD) |
Rulers or Events for that
period (underlined text = hyperlinks) |
Comments |
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
10 |
10 |
Worthy
of Honor, Father! |
Syllable 1 = 1 ad
= Christ Age 1 (Born very end 2BC), and
also: o Octavian Augustus power
consolidation, tax reform. Res
Gestae. o
Livy was
a contemporary historian. o
Herod dies, in effect legates his
property to Augustus. |
Opening,
Greek Drama-style: Eulogy. Pax Romana as God's Setup so people
could easily
travel to Israel
and learn Christ. SPQR called
Caesar Augustus,
a 'father'; Christ called God, Father; we do too, due to Christ. |
||
1:3,
cont. |
10 |
20 |
Lord
and Master |
Augustus is deified,
at
death; Tiberius
becomes Caesar @ year 14. |
Christ
as Lord Himself, Masters Himself by adulthood. What SPQR
called Augustus, now deified. What we
call Christ. |
|
1:3,
cont. |
7 |
27 |
Blessing
(us) |
Tiberius,
cont.; at end Pilate
becomes procurator of Judaea (26 or 27). Circa 23, Tiberius goes bad, due
to Sejanus (Livia the Younger's alleged
lover). Philo on
Jewish persecution after Sejanus. |
World is blessed due to Christ; world is blessed due to Rome's stability; Judaea's
many factions are subdued by switch
to Pilate. |
|
1:3,
cont. |
10 |
37 |
every
spiritual blessing |
Christ
Announces Himself @30, pays
for sins @33; @37, Jews accuse
Pilate of bad administration, so Pilate
leaves for Rome to face charges;
while on his way, Tiberius
dies and the charges are either
dropped against Pilate or he doesn't get in much trouble. |
Christ's Ministry, Victory, Seated in the heavens. Church begins. Pilate even gets blessed. Paul converts the Year Christ died, and
begins his own retraining, here. |
|
1:3,
cont. |
10 |
47 |
with
those living in the heavens |
Caligula begins
reign. Per Philo XLII
(334) vs. Josephus
Antiiq. XVIII.8.1, Agrippa stops Caligula from
making himself a god in Jerusalem's Temple;
Caligula murdered next, in 'our' 41 (Roman
troops become kingmakers by assassination and acclamation). Claudius then
becomes Caesar, banishes
Jews & Christians from
Rome. So in 47, Claudius hosts
Secular Games 47 years early, for Rome's 800th birthday. |
Caligula wants to be a god in Jerusalem? Ok, the God OF
Jerusalem gives him an apotheosis of
hell. Paul's ministry begins. Christianity caught on like wildfire, in
the wake of the Crucifixion. Rulers don't try to make themselves foreign temple
idols or banish foreigners unless those foreigners' ideas are VERY
popular with the locals. |
|
9 |
56 |
exzelexzeto:
elected |
Claudius dies in 54 (@end
of link); Nero comes to power, age
17. He's the last
'Claudio-Julian'. Seneca is his
advisor. |
Claudius
elects to banish Jews and Christians,
so God elects to banish him, too. |
||
1:4,
cont. |
10 |
66 |
kataboles;
founding |
Paul
released (62), but then Fire of Rome (64); but there had been many. Nero
blames Christians, begins persecution. Same year, he has an amazing victory over
Parthia, and forms a bond with its rulers.
Parthia at that point controls Babylon, where Peter and many Diaspora
Jews and Christians live. The
persecution of Christians, eventually reaches Parthian territories. |
Nero re-founded all on himself, changed city names,
calendar, etc. 66 is
the earliest expected Rapture Date: Christ would have been dead
as long as alive; 7 years before the Temple
would have stood 40 years post-Cross.
Ties to the 33 and 7 divisions in
David's Rulership. So, based on
Daniel 9, both a siege by Rome and Temple's razing to its foundation, was
expected, by 66. |
|
1:4,
cont. |
7 |
73 |
hagios:
holy |
Nero executes Paul and then himself, 68; Year
of the 4 Emperors, ending with Vespasian, 69, replete
with 'holy' claims he healed people.
Temple destroyed, 70; rebellion
and Titus' siege of Jerusalem, 64-70 or 66-73 AD. (Varies by how one counts
AUC. Josephus versus Tacitus, on whether Titus meant to destroy the Temple. ) |
'founding'
from previous clause still ties. For Rome is shaken to her foundations, by the Year of the 4
Emperors. For the Rapture was expected when Temple fell, long known to be 40 years post-Cross, an excuse Josephus even
used, to save his life before Vespasian. [Chap.8, s.9.] |
|
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:4,
cont. |
4 |
77 21 |
amwmous:
blameless |
Vespasian,
still. 'Caesar' now means heir-apparent. |
77
would have been 7 years prior to the 50th year after Christ's death, so Rapture was
expected here, too. |
|
1:4,
cont. |
7 |
84 7 |
kata:
Before Him, by His Standard |
Vespasian dies
in 79, Titus takes over, dies
in 81, followed by Domitian,
last of Flavians. Pliny
is historian, mentor of Suetonius;
latter is nearly same age as Tacitus. |
50
years after Christ's Death, Rapture expected
to begin in 84 under old Daniel 9 timeline.
So our 'standard' of how God ought to
behave, wasn't met. So
we get Domitian's. :) |
|
10 |
94 |
proorisas:
foreordained |
Domitian,
still. He banishes or restricts Christians due
to expected Messiah, i.e., John, Rev 17:10: count from after
Nero, when the last Bible books went out -- Galba, Otho, Vitellius,
Vespasian, Titus = the prior 5. |
Last
expected Rapture date, should have been when the Millennium started, by 94. Christians turn
anti-semitic. That's how apostate they
had become. |
||
1:5,
cont. |
11 |
10521 |
huiothesian:
Sonship |
o
Domitian
exiles John to Patmos in 96,
dies just afterwards. o
Nerva
takes over, adopts Trajan, dies
in 98; o
Trajan now
as Caesar, finishes Dacian war;
next, secures Nabatean Arabia. Golden Boy makes Golden Age. o
Trajan defers to
Senate; keeps Nerva's policy of taxing
Jews, vs. persecution.
Christians are exempt, so
open to persecution. Trajan adopts don't
ask don't tell policy. Pliny (Younger) is
contemporary. |
'Foreordained'
still ties, now plus huiothesian: o
The Adoptive
Emperors. o Mass
Christian disaffection, apostasy when Rapture per pre-Church timeline, doesn't
occur. John writes Rev to say why. o
RISE OF CHURCH FATHERS (of
apostasy). As soon as John is
exiled, Clement
of Rome and
self-praising
Ignatius, claim a false doctrine of apostolic succession
(violating 1Cor15:1-10). They have no
conscience, even allege elderly
John would flee a bathhouse, to
avoid a heretic! |
|
1:5,
cont. |
9 |
114 |
eis
auton: into
Him |
o So
what happens? Ignatius advertises
himself AS Christian to GET martyred,
ignoring Matt. 10:14; Mk. 6:11; Lk. 9:5.
Christians father falsehoods, crusade
against other Christians, Rome, military and civil service; so make
Christianity, odious to Rome. Insightful
article on years 105-133 re Trajan and Hadrian, why
the anti-Jewish, anti-Christian policy. o From 114-117, Trajan
wins to Persian Gulf, but is overextended (p.189). As he retreats, the new subjects (including
Jews), rebel. |
huiothesian
eis auton: o
Emperors adopt sons
into themselves, and God adopts sons into Christ. Appendix I
shows its interplay. o
Christians adopt
nikw-laus, rulers-of-the-people
-- rather than conquer/ overcome via Christ -- o ignoring His many warnings against all this. (Matt
20:25-26, 23:1-12, Mark 10:42-43; Luke 22:25-26; Rev 2:2, 6, 7, 9, 14-15, 17,
20, 24, 26, 3:5, 9, 12, 21; also Rev 17 .
Compare to 1Cor15:1-10, Gal 3:6-9, 1John2:4, 9, 14, 18-19,22; 2John 1:7.) First-century
summary and downloadable
here; read between the lines, that
biased but useful tracing, how Church apostatized, post-Cross. Its 2nd
century summary. |
|
1:5,
cont. |
7 |
121 |
thele (soundplay
on He wills) |
Trajan dies,
117, adopted Hadrian 3
days before; Dio
claims heirship was posthumous.
Here's
a map of what Hadrian
inherited. He gives up the
Eastern lands Trajan won. |
Trajan wills to
persecute Christians and adopt Hadrian; GOD wills for Trajan to die and adopt Hadrian, who
maybe slacked off on persecuting Christians.
Plague in Rome at this time. |
|
12 |
13328 |
epainon
doxzes: praise
of Glory |
Hadrian,
still. Ends with Bar Kochba and adoption of Antoninus
Pius. Hadrian goes mad, orders Romans die, which
Pius stops. They praise him for that,
call his rule the Glory Days of Rome.
This is the first επαινον benchmark. 2nd is
here.
3rd is here. |
Meanwhile,
Rome praises herself, considers herself to
be in her glory days. with these 'Four [or Five] Good Emperors'. God
meanwhile builds Church via safety He grants Rome, and via Diaspora from Bar Kochba
rebellion. For the Diaspora enables Bible mss. preservation and distribution. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:6,
cont. |
8 |
141 |
echaritwsen:
graced (us) out |
o
Bar Kochba Rebellion (132-135); Hadrian
seeks end to sedition. o
Hadrian razes
Jerusalem and puts pig
temple on Holy of Holies. Rebuilt
city is named Aelia Capitolina (140). o
Hadrian dies in 138; o
Antoninus Pius
becomes Caesar, o
as he also adopted Lucius Verus, Marcus Aurelius. |
Diaspora
for Jews and Church. God thus protects them against future persecution,
since a disbursed group, is hard to find. Jews are barred from the City except on Tish
B'Av. This helps protect them from
catching the plague. Refugees move
east or south. Christian
anti-semitism is high, proving Christian love of Word, is zero. |
|
1:6,
cont. |
6 |
14714 |
within
the Beloved |
Antoninus
Pius, still. Golden Age of Rome, in him. |
In the
provinces or in Rome, Christians get some
reprieve. But instead of explaining redemption to
pagans, anti-semitic Christians like Justin Martyr are snotty in both discourse and print. They ¨
mindlessly quote Scripture
with
verbal diarrhea and BLATANT power grabs;
¨
'martyr' accounts are haughty and goofy, full of
bloodlust. ¨
Apologies and 'teachings' reeking with anti-semitism
and false doctrine
like 'almsgiving
frees from death'. Hmmm. I thought Christ's PAYMENT on the Cross,
did that? ¨
They refuse military and
civil office, yet agitate for
rights to Caesar (not God); they
denounce others who also twist Scripture, as heretics. Christians thus invite persecution, despite
the tolerance policy of Pius. |
|
10 |
157 |
apolutrwsin:
redemption. |
Antoninus Pius,
still. Golden Age of Rome,
continued. Pius 'redeems' Roman
culture. |
|||
|
8 |
165 |
His
Blood |
Antoninus
Pius dies in 160; Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus
jointly become
Caesars (sets precedence). Church is divided, too; she
greatly politicizes and fights within herself. Loves to exaggerate and bastardize
Scripture, make
up lies about Mark, Peter, Matthew, contradict Scripture regarding Mary, claim to be arbiters of
Canon. |
||
1:8,
cont. |
10 |
17528 |
aphiemi..
paraptwmatwn: debt cancellation for our sins |
Beginning
166, Commodus,
then age 5 (maybe the same age as Dio
Cassius), is named Caesar.
Also, plague (maybe brought from Parthia by Verus' victorious legions), invasions and disasters in and outside
Rome, result in Roman mobs spontaneously persecuting Christians.
Commodus said he was a god to cancel
the past, begin Time anew. |
Of
course we Christians were to blame, Leviticus 26! We weren't
using our debt cancellation assets of 1John1:9! Instead, we reflect the pagans' own
hypocrisy, and add new forms of our own, 'fathering'
apostacy, further. |
|
1:8,
cont. |
11 |
186 |
ploutos;
riches |
o
Commodus
began co-ruling in 177, age
16. (The movie Gladiator is inaccurately based on Aurelius
and Commodus.) o
Marcus Aurelius dies
in 180 at Vienna. o
Commodus was
there, and immediately takes over. o
Commodus is famous for claiming his
rule as the New age of prosperity, for squandering money. o
He taxed the rich,
gave to the poor. o
Commodus believed
himself a god of grace and protection.
So he didn't much enforce the laws against Christians and Jews. |
Marcus had 13 kids! So he wanted Commodus, versus the
others. It's a common theme of
child-kings to imagine themselves gods, throw money on games, the people,
toys, make silly laws. (See the lives of Caligula, Nero, Caracalla, Heliogabalus.) We Christians squander our riches, too,
not growing up in Christ; preferring magic and lies; Tertullian
and Athenagoras
appeal to Caesar, not God. So we
impoverish the world, and acCommodate a Herculean farce. [Page 757-8 of my
hardback copy of M. Cary's History of Rome (XLIII) covers our
disinterest in the Greek; so it's easy to see why Bible interest went to
zero. ] |
|
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
9 |
195 |
eperisseusen:
superabounds |
¨ Ecumenism
begins at this time.
There is still no pope; but rather, competing bishops, sects,
factions. See 'Church Father' writings. ¨ Commodus murdered,
192. Prior to that, he superabounded in bankrupting SPQR for his own
pleasures; and superabounded in
persecuting civic leaders in and outside the Senate. Every office was for sale, as Commodus left
daily affairs to his superaboundingly-greedy subordinates, then tossed them
to the people for superabounding revenge, when those subordinates were caught
in their corruption. So at
last, his own sweetheart and his closest friends, murdered him (it took
several tries). ¨ Army
elects Pertinax,
then murders him because he imposes sound fiscal policies and discipline,
makes SPQR solvent again, 193. ¨ Army
then elects highest-donative-bidder Didius Julianus,
still 193; then murders him ¨ when
a later (doubled) donative is bid by Septimus Severus'
second wife, Julia Domna, still 193. Along the way, she similarly helps her
husband beat his other rival, Piscennius Niger. ¨
Julia Domna and her
female relatives, via their too-young sons, will dominate Imperial
politics until 235, causing
'the Crisis
of the Third Century' (235-284),
when Rome almost died. |
Get the wit here, it's awesome: ¨ As CHRISTIANS
superabound in falsehood -- anti-military,
anti-semitic,
clueless re
1John1:9, legalistic, do as they
accuse others, are goofy, legalistic,
petty
and superficial
-- the world gets a ¨ Commodus who
superabounded in wasteful extravagance, as he's too young to know any better,
¨ is
replaced by a superaboundingly-old pertinacious aka stingy man
who gets Rome back on financial track in only three months; so he's superaboundingly murdered. ¨ Followed
by a superabounding donative demand, didomi'd by (one of many) who bid the most -- ¨ until
outdone by a woman who doubled the bid, ¨ whose
superaboundingly-ambitious, superstitious and Severe
husband picked her, sight unseen, based on her horoscope (and her money); ¨ who
himself superabounded in setting Rome right again, albeit with superabounding
Severity. ¨ Problem
was, their two kids superabounded in hatred for
each other, with the result that the older kills the younger while in his
mother's arms, at his accession. ¨
So the women will superaboundingly
control Roman politics (pregnantly, hidden) until
235, ¨ when
their superaboundingly-wise-though-young Severus Alexander, will
be superaboundingly murdered for yet more money, by his own troops. |
||
1:8,
cont. |
10 |
205 |
sophiai
kai phronesei: wisdom and reasoned thought |
Reign
of Septimius
Severus. He makes son Caracalla a Caesar
in 195; co-emperor, in 198. To fragment competition, Severus multiplied
army and jurisprudence, setting a precedent that ultimately split the Empire
due to its weight. Historians acclaim this reign as famous for its
wisdom and reasoned thought in Law, how it stabilized rule. |
||
10 |
215 |
musterion; hidden knowledge |
Severus dies in 211;
Caracalla soon
murders his co-regent brother Geta; by 215, his
intimates try to murder him. Under
him, though, Severus' alleged proscription of Christianity is ignored; and in
212, everyone becomes a Roman citizen (so they can be
taxed). So Christians
can hide better. The Severan persecution was against
holy-roller like activity (Montanism) by Christians claiming 'secret
knowledge' or 'oracular utterance'; the local populace reacted. |
Church
keyword musterion is a culturally-loaded term. It means something KNOWN only to those
within a group. It's a play on
pregnancy, too. Paul couples the term
with pleromatos in verse 10's first clause. This wry
stress on motherhood shows the times were pregnant, which is Paul's point, in
verse 10. Christ pregnant with
Church on Cross, makes Church the deliverance of history, Paul's same theme
since Romans 8:11-28, and Galatians 4:19. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:9,
cont. |
7 |
222 |
thele (soundplay
on He Wills) |
¨
Hindu-like, the idea of God as one supreme Being, becomes suddenly
popular among pagans; Christians expect the Rapture. ¨ In 217,
they finally murder
Caracalla, and ¨ Macrinus --
career military -- takes
his place. ¨
"probablement en
mai" 218 -- Macrinus designates his own son Diadumenianus as
co-emperor, and both are promptly murdered by the Julia
sisters' bribing connivance.
For Macrinus didn't pay the troops as well. ¨ This
buy-the-Army conspiracy results in adolescent grandson Heliogabalus made
Emperor in 218, at age 15 (age of
manhood); ¨ Sun-baby
is murdered in 222; replacing him is
another grandson, ¨ Severus
Alexander, newly toga'd, who Sun-baby was constrained to adopt the previous year. ¨ So each seeks his own will and purpose; Julia
sisters plotted
to make Elagabalus look bad, to make Severus look good. |
Suddenly, Julius Africanus invents a 'bishop list'
claiming Peter in Rome, to help Demetrius disparage Origen in Rome; suddenly, the word 'catholic' is used to
say 'my' (Roman) church (Callistus')
is better than 'yours' (Hippolytus) . See Bishop
Lists by Dr. Williams. Videos on his book, start here. 2nd εὐδοκίαν anaphora benchmark
begins; this is 'Crisis of the 3rd
Century', when Rome
almost dies. Appendix I covers secular interplay; click here
for spiritual interplay. In 1st
benchmark , Paul tied eudokian anaphora's 2nd
e to death of Trajan,
then. So too here: Macrinus dies.
Stresses how succession REVERSES the deceased's WILL. Paul
will do it again in 3rd (final) benchmark,
for Diocletian's death at syllable=year 316. |
|
|
9 |
231 56 |
eudokian:
good will and purpose |
Severus
Alexander's regents are gramma Julia Maesa & his mother J. Mamaea; she proves to
be a capable
administrator; she well trains her son for fit rule. (Sun-baby was the son of J.
Soaemias.) |
Alexander
was pagan, but pro-Christian; his Sun-god priestly mothers made him pious; so
images of Abraham and Jesus, accompanied his private devotions. |
|
1:9,
cont. |
7 |
238 7 |
proetheto: set
before, display, offer |
¨ In 231 Alexander's
generals beat the Sassanids, in his
presence. Another serve-up: Peter-suddenly-bishop promoting Hippolytus
(who used the Bishop List in 217-220's to garner favor with Severan mothers),
plus his bishop-designate Pantianus, are
exiled; the latter is martyred. ¨ But next
at Mainz, Alexander negotiated peace with
the Germans. The Roman army there felt insulted. So
they murder him, in 235; they acclaim their 62-year-old general Maximinus Thrax; next both Africa and the Senate revolt,
together offer four usurpers, in 238. The first two die in battle and
suicide; the remaining two Senatorial
appointees -- unpopular at home -- are
themselves dispatched by the Praetorian Guard there -- and another teenager, known as Gordian III, is acclaimed instead. ¨ So Max marches
on Rome; meanwhile, his besieging army at Aquileia is starving.
¨ So
when he arrives there to relieve them in June 238, they instead get fed by killing Max
and his son. ¨ Since
proetheto means
to 'set a meal before someone' --
hence to 'make a public offering', especially to God -- we see Paul's wry
wit: all dine on prostrate Rome, ignoring God's Offer of His Own Son. For
Christians TWIST
and mangle
Scripture to express how much
they hate Jews and
everyone else, instead
devouring each other in spiritual civil war; rather than, dine on CHRIST. So the 'Crisis
of the Third Century' is OUR fault: we eat from the wrong
table. For more proof,
here's our Church Father Hall of Shame. Setup, for a Decius. For God must judge us when apostate,
Leviticus 26, Deut 28. ¨ But
again, a 13-year-old wins the Roman meal
ticket, for a little while. |
||
14 |
25214 |
oikonomia: estate management pleromatos:
pregnant with cargo, on verge of
content delivery. kairwn:
lit., 'the times', meaning TIME itself. |
¨ Beardless
Gordianus III gets Imperial meat until
he's 19, and then dies from illness or murder while
on campaign contra Sassanids, in 244. ¨ Army acclaims Philip the Arab in
his place, with longtime Imperial manager
and brother Priscus, the likely orchestrator
behind it all: the man who loved to tax
Eastern cargo; a rector, hidden from the publicity of Rex. But he suddenly dies, unknown how. ¨ In 248,
Rome celebrated its 1000th birthday,
and there were usurpers, too. Gossips claimed Philip a Christian; under whom,
Catholicism ecumenized=oikonomia'zed,
enraptured with the lie she was to be an earthly power, too. ¨ In 249, to dispatch the usurpers, Philip sent Decius, a member
of the unfriendly-to-Philip, Senate.
The latter's army dispatched
the usurpers, but then acclaimed Decius
Emperor instead; so also dispatched Philip
and his heir-appointed son. ¨ Decius
begins the estate management of SPQR
by courting the Senate, thus claiming to return
to the glory days of Republican Rome. This included reviving
the office of censor, given the much-respected Valerian in 251. Consequently, each person in the empire had
to furnish
written proof (libelli) that he sacrificed to the gods of Rome
(same idea as the loyalty oath of Octavian).
Since Christianity was an in-your-face, Let's-reject-Romans 11,
hostile-to-Empire political movement with ZERO faith in God, Christians were
targeted -- if not by Decius, then by the locals who had to administer this
law. For
God was punishing us. ¨ It's
now 251. Decius
himself won't live long enough to see the effects of his attempt to turn back time. He dies in battle or maybe murdered
during battle on July 1: the Senate glorified him a tad too much, so
you can't be sure of any grief. ¨ Tearfully,
the army appointed another senator-general, Trebonianus Gallus
in his place; of course the Senate confirmed it. ¨ The
40-something Gallus, still warring with the Goths, instead
makes a too-quick-and-shameful peace,
then rushes to Rome, which suffers from the plague. ¨ Meanwhile,
the Roman charged with administering the
treaty (Gallus made) to appease the Goths, Aemilianus aka Aemilian
-- reneges. (Whether
he instigated the breach or was prompted to it by Scythian aka Gothic
hostility, is unclear.) He instead defeats the Goths;
so his grateful troops proclaim Aemilian
Emperor, instead. ¨ It's
now 252. Persians attack Roman
garrisons and defeat them. Stage set
for another battle. |
|||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:10,
cont. |
8 |
260 |
anakephalewsthasthai: to sum up, bring under One Head |
¨ It's
now 253. The erstwhile censor Valerian was
then in Rhaetia; Gallus ordered him back south to Rome to defend
against Aemilian. August 253: Gallus'
troops opt to kill him and his son Volusianus, and
instead join Aemilianus. ¨ This
prompts Valerian to march to Rome against Aemilian, and
the troops under the latter, to switch allegiance and kill him. ¨ So Valerian comes to power in September of 253. ¨ Valerian then gets
his son Gallienus
ratified as Caesar, and assigns to him the West. This will change Roman history forever: the
empire is now legally divided. Thus God delivers Time: for Gallienus in the West, is
not disposed to persecuting Christians, or to giving the Catholic Church,
sole voice. In the East, Rome lacks
sufficient control; so Persia now
makes nice with anyone who will ally against Rome. So this division PROTECTS BIBLE IN THE
WEST despite a clergy
ignorant of the Spirit, substituting
Him with chastity and justifying
anti-semitism
even after Decius; thus justifying a 'whirlwind' named Diocletian. ¨ Valerian
himself then goes off to even up the score with the Persians, but in
259-260 his troops are defeated by plague; hence he sues for
peace; instead, he is humiliatingly
killed by Persian king Shophur aka Sapor.
SPQR is too weak to revenge him.
So now divided SPQR, has only one
Head. Sorta. |
||
1:10,
cont. |
7 |
267 |
everything
in Christ |
This
period covers Gallienus' remaining rule. It's a tangled tale. ¨ Rome breaks up into regions, each with its
own self-declared ruler. ¨ The plague continues, too. ¨ So
Gallienus is forced to innovate and operate
on interior lines. ¨ He
expands the freedom of commoners to hold higher military posts while
curtailing that of the nobility to do the same; he reinforces
this independence by creating smaller and swifter military units; ¨ he
buttresses this with edicts granting more
freedom of religion, versus his dad's policies. ¨ So he
lets Gaul, go. ¨ He
focuses on local popularity, and sponsors lavish entertainment. ¨ Militarily,
he gets welcome help from Odenathus of Palmyra,
thus easing threats against Gallienus from the East for the next five years. ¨ Odenathus is
assassinated in 267, and
his militarily-astute wife Zenobia
takes over. ¨
As a
result of all this fragmentation, Christianity is free to grow. But of course, Christians don't grow. But Bible gets preserved. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:10,
cont. |
8 |
275 |
everything
in the heavens |
¨ By 268, all
these concessions by Gallienus
prove too much for the Senate; so they help the Praetorian guard, kill him
in Greece. One of the likely
conspirators, Claudius
II 'Gothicus', takes over. He
will die of the plague while on campaign against the Goths, which he finally
wins, dying in 270. ¨ His
designated successor, was immediately contested. Soldiers replaced Claudius' brother Quintillus with
Aurelian,
probably with the latter's connivance. ¨ Barbarian
incursions kept Aurelian busy in the field; other usurpers with
their own armies, kept him campaigning as well. Through a combination of negotiation or
military skill, he defeated rivals, ¨ but
in the process reconstituted Dacia
solely on the south bank of the Danube, in effect abandoning its
northern territory. That rankled his
troops. Trajan fought (against
Decebalus) more than five years for that territory, at much cost to Rome. ¨ By
contrast, in 272 Aurelian
nobly bested Zenobia in the East; ¨ then
in 274, Tetricus in the west -- chafing under a female
leader -- defected to Aurelian. ¨ Both
vanquished foe having betrayed their former allies, were rewarded with
comfortable lives in Rome. ¨ Now Aurelian
could focus attention on reforming the economic situation, having temporarily consolidated his territory. To this end he reforms coinage and worship
to ONE god, Sol Invictus (introduced
by Heliogabalus, for which cause the latter was evicted from life). Thus
the heavens are claimed to be united, too. Sol's
birthday is 25 December, which was likely Chanukah
in 4 bc, when the Lord was born (Jewish
calendar likely wasn't intercalated, as I explained in http://www.brainout.net/PassPlot.htm#HisBday). ¨ So
that left him with a need to defeat the Persians. He was on his way to do that, when one of
his secretaries who feared what the reform might reveal, successfully plotted
with others to murder Aurelian, Fall 275. |
||
1:10,
cont. |
8 |
283 |
everything
on earth |
¨ In
rare orderly fashion, Tacitus
was acclaimed and then affirmed by the Senate to replace Aurelian. Then Tacitus died
of illness or murder, just after defeating the Goths again, in 276. ¨ After
a brief contest, Probus becomes the
next Emperor that summer. Through a
series of either brilliant or at least plucky maneuvers, he manages to check
the many barbarian incursions and usurpers during his six-year reign. The last usurper, however, won over Probus' own
troops , who kill him in the Fall of 282. ¨ The
last usurper's name? Carus. This latter immediately designates his two
sons Numerian
and Carinus as
Caesars, again keeping SPQR divided, with Carinus taking the
West. ¨
Under them, is a temperamental,
charismatic, superstitious man; in his
youth, a gypsy prophesied he'd become Emperor, once he killed a boar. So this
guy long dreamed he'd be Emperor. His
name? At the time, Diocles, which in Greek sounds like steal,
scoff, break in two. Or, if you want to mix misspelled Greek and Latin, God-called. But later? Diocletian. ¨ Diocletian's big goal in life was to unite SPQR under himself. Everything on earth. Click
here to download an insightful 1876 analysis, from Google. It's vital to grasp Diocles'
mindset, as he forever stamped Rome, and is the archetype personality Daniel
11 depicts. Click
here for another great book on the man and his times; or click here, for the
videos on the book. Paul carefully words Eph1:10-11 to focus on this
man's rule, so a) Christians know how to read Time and thus flee, plus
b) so we can appreciate God's Own Detailed Inheritance Plan for our
lives. Diocletian unwittingly
represents the worst of Satan's plan for the Tribulation, and the Best of
God's plan for our own free unity in Christ. It ends up a cyclical trend of history. ¨ So Diocletian personally
dates his own accession based on Carus'
death, which perhaps Diocletian helped cause, in 283. Hebrew priestly course named 'boar' (17th
course, Hezir), started near July 20th. So Diocles
ho
hus gets to be huios.
So his former chief's sons, die as
strangely as their dad, in the months between Christmas 283
(Carus), and July 284 (Numerian, and
Carinus soon after; later
scholarship says November
284). |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
8 |
291 |
inherit |
¨ Per Diocletian's
own standard, his rule begins Christmas 283,
when Carus dies.
Diocletian claims December 22 as his birthday,
too. Cute. ¨ Diocletian is a
totalistic, committed (and hence autocratic), methodical and ascetic,
temperamental and affable, stern and superstitious man, married to a
Christian sympathizer (and apparently in love with her), surrounded by
beloved Christian subordinates. He is
obsessed with Empire, unity, uniformity. He will thus end up losing all he loves. ¨ So he has an elaborate inheritance
plan, too. For that plan is to have a co-emperor with
him who does all the fighting, whilst he -- Diocletian -- runs the
empire. To that end, Diocletian
straightaway appoints Maximianus,
in 285. Good
cop, bad cop. ¨ Diocletian next
institutes massive reforms of every kind. He reorganizes military
and political districts, first.
He halves the sizes so doubles the districts, bureaucracy;
constructs a perimeter of troop deployments, walls, fortifications akin to
the later Maginot Line. Italy --
except Rome and her prestigious suburbs -- is now taxed, too. (His governmental
organization forms the model for the Roman Catholic Church, which will ape
his structures and even vocabulary.) Top-heavy.
Over-regulated. High
maintenance. A kingdom of martinets. Founded on magic. ¨ Diocletian
begins a campaign to gloss
over past history, like the cartouche-erasing Ramses; or, Augustus'
use of the Aeneid. ¨ To
that end, he returns
to Roman religion on a superficially-oriental model,
making the Augusti, officials of Jove (Diocletian) and Hercules
(Maximian) -- so converse with them becomes distant, rare, ostentatious. The idea is to inculcate awe. ¨ Diocletian
also sidelines the Senate, with a combination of adroit moves to shift economic and political strength
OUTSIDE Rome. His
long-term plan is to base all key operations beyond the Senate's grasp,
while shallowly but sincerely, honoring them.
Thus does the barbarian threat reduce, as power spreads and comes TO
them. But it serves to fragment, Rome. That, of course, is the main strategic
goal. He converted the Empire
into
absolute rule. ¨ So Diocletian
manages to spend less and less time IN Rome, a place whose licentiousness, he
abhors. Gifted appeasements to the
Senate, appeals to dignity, quietly halving the Praetorian guard -- all the
while, pleading barbarian incursions and usurper threats as the raison
d'etre. Meanwhile, Diocletian
diffuses military power via those many fortifications and walls. Just as Augustus, but with more
palaver. For Diocletian deemed himself
a second Augustus. And the Senate, so long as it was honored,
willingly considered him one. |
|||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:11,
cont. |
10 |
301 49 |
Foreordained
per Temple Shewbread Plan |
¨ Meanwhile,
Maximian and his generals -- soon to become Caesars -- run around SPQR
fighting barbarians and usurpers. They
are too busy and surfeited with honor,
to officially rebel, themselves; so they bide their time, and undercut Diocletian's (often
disastrous) designs in other
ways. They reduce usurpations among
the troops; especially, in Britain (Constantius). ¨ In 293, two Caesars are appointed to replace the Augusti in 20 years, retroactively based
on Diocletian's official 285
accession. Clever baking plan for all would-be Caesars; new
Caesars also had to appoint their own Caesars. ¨ To
that end, Diocletian appoints both Constantius I and Galerian as the
Caesars. ¨
Constantius must marry Maximianus'
daughter Theodora; Galerian must
marry Diocletian's daughter Valeria. Both Caesars had
women they had to set aside. Both
had sons whom the new wives adopted. ¨ This Tetrarchy (modern historians'
term) provides each of the Four with his own
territory; Diocletian retains
supreme authority. Edicts are
jointly signed, and hold true for all;
enforcement varies. Constantius at
times has Spain, Gaul and Britain. Maximian has Italy,
Africa. Galerius
has mostly Germany
(incl. West Russia and lands north of Italy proper). Diocletian retains
the East. ¨
Under Diocletian and
long living with him, is a young apprentice: son of Constantius I Paleface,
named Constantine. Some historians claim Constantine was
a hostage of Galerius.
After Diocletian's retirement, he was hostage;
but not
earlier. Bet ya money, Constantine
was the son Diocletian wished he'd had;
the latter, was the father Galerius wished he'd had. So Galerius was jealous of anyone who
had Diocletian's affection. (How else explain Galerius' insecure
behavior, threatening Maximian and
insisting on TWO unrelated
'Caesars' as HIS OWN appointees?
Galerius must have been jealous.
You can't call Galerius' first two choices, good statecraft. He picked YES men. He was only entitled to ONE 'Caesar', but
wanted TWO. Petulantly.) ¨ In 295, Diocletian begins building his retirement
home in what we call Croatia. For he feels secure. ¨ In 301, He institutes a state-regulated
economy so that prices and jobs one can hold, are
all state-determined; it was preceded
by coinage
value problems, hence an indiction
scheme. Such regulation ruins
the economy, creates
capital flight; the inevitable black market and tax evasion, all result;
it wasn't enforced, long. But Constantine
will continue most of Diocletian's changes. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:11,
cont. |
7 |
308 7 |
God
works everything together |
¨
In 303, whether premeditated or in a fit of pique, Diocletian issues the first two of four edicts expressly persecuting Christians. Here we get full insight into the
relationships. (The 1876
analysis of Diocletian persecution is well-written piece: I mostly stick to Mason's summary there, in
what follows.) Eusebius was
contemporary. Here is TD
Barnes' account: he divides this persecution in two phases, one in 299
and the other in 303. He also says
that Porphyry
began writing at this time. Porphyry
was a courtier. ¨
Impetus: the superstitious Diocletian was getting
haruspices that (conveniently) the priests said were blocked, as 'atheists' (Christians) were present. Maybe Galerius
tried to separate Diocletian from his wife, daughter (=
Galerius' wife, whom he hated); and from his closest servants. As what drove Diocletian was
UNITY, LOYALTY and COMMITMENT, he was incensed; he demanded their removal.. or participation. Some do, some don't. He calms down, gets oracular reply -- which
of course conforms to Galerius'
position. This prompts upset but no
retaliation, for Diocletian is loyal to underlings, too. So Galerius is
frustrated, and maybe sponsors a palace fire – in any event, he blames the
Christians. Diocletian
rages; hence his trusted servants are
tortured and then killed; he compels
his wife and daughter to sacrifice to the gods. Hence the edicts. King Lear story, really. Purim story, too: for like Haman, they consulted 'the
gods', chose first Edict to begin on Terminalia (23 February 303);
that would have been same week or even day, as Jewish Purim. Second Edict was promulgated by (next?)
summertime. ¨
The edicts
become a model for the post-Constantinian Christian
emperors and RCC persecutions of Christians; Constantine himself increasingly
adopts Diocletian's proscriptions, here against pagans and Jews; all
this, under instigation BY Catholics. Idea
that the 'wrong' faiths are unpatriotic; same raison d'etre, as
always in Rome. Muslims and Hitler,
will later emulate him. ¨
To
wit: any Christian forfeits all his offices
and if he has none, his rights;
all clergy are jailed;
worship assembly is forbidden; all churches are burnt, and
their property confiscated;
especially, all Bibles are
to be confiscated
and burnt; anyone can recant
simply by sacrificing to the gods. The
local constabulary are empowered to do house by house searches, if need
be. They were remarkably
efficient. Almost
no Bibles or lectionaries from the period, survive. ¨
Torture is forbidden, but
if a different crime is committed, torture and even execution may be used. So the locals egg the already-arrogant
Christians, to commit crimes like refusing to answer questions or badmouthing
the state. Then, they are
tortured. Gruesomely. ¨
Galerius and his allies will later form
the other two edicts, which allow any
kind of confiscation, torture or execution, slavery,
etc. Targets are Jews and Christians. (Constantine and Sons too will eventually
adopt this at RCC insistence.) ¨
This persecution lasts
largely until Galerius dies in 311, with periods of
respite. Appearing to confess to his
error as he dies, Galerian's last edict
seeks to sow division into Christianity by defining only one
allowed VERSION of it. But his
dying gambit doesn't work. The
persecution never takes hold in Constantius' territory;
and is only intermittently applied everywhere else, to curry favor with Galerius
(i.e., by Maxentius, Daza,
etc). ¨
During this time Tiridates
becomes a Christian, thus Parthia becomes
a haven for those fleeing Galerius and Diocletian. ¨
In 304, Diocletian
suffers
an illness that might have been a stroke or even cancer, just after
celebrating his 20th anniversary (based
on Carus' death) with a triumphal-like procession, in Rome. He is a broken man, afterwards. ¨
Diocletian himself, thus retires in 305, and
makes Maximian do it, too. ¨
Also during this time, the Tetrarchy and
their designates, war with each other. ¨
In 306, Constantine manages to
escape his 'host' Galerius, fleeing to his dad in Britain, where
Paleface then dies, in York. The
troops acclaim Constantine Emperor; since Diocletian
maybe wanted that all along, Galerius is
forced to acknowledge it. (Big debate here, among scholars.) ¨
But
not without a fight. Galerius
first nominates
his own Caesars: starting with, a too-gullible Severus. Diocletian
privately protests, but goes on tending his cabbages and Sun statuary. ¨
By contrast Maximian,
maybe fomenting or reacting (stories contradict) -- comes
back to power when his own son Maxentius (married to Galerius' daughter!) rebels at Galerius'
choice, still 306. Italy -- chafing under
taxation -- is Maxentius' target;
both dad and son pretend allegiance yet wrangle
for power there. ¨
Galerius sends Severus to
put them down; Severus is
then tricked by Maximianus into surrender and open-the-veins
execution, 307. This same Max then took his other daughter (Fausta) to
marry and thus gain support of the armed-but-aloof Constantine. He weds, talks nice, does nothing. ¨
So Galerius
advances to Rome himself, 307. Maxentius
(like a later Stalin) used the huge territory between them to logistically
defeat Galerius -- who furiously retreated home, wrecking
everything in his path. That bought a
little time, and apparently Maximian
returned to Rome in time to celebrate (or compete)
with his son. Panegyrics
reveal the propaganda of this time. ¨
Maximian then
goes to Diocletian in November
308 and still gets no help, at
Carnuntum. ¨
Not to be outdone, Galerius at that same meeting,
tries to curry favor with Constantine by
recognizing him as Augustus -- this, (maybe) two years after
Constantine had already been Emperor of his territory, signing edicts,
etc. Clear hypocrisy. ¨
Galerius back
in 305 had also crowned his nephew, Daza (aka
Daia); but now, après Severus -- Licinius. Galerius wanted Licinius
to replace Constantine. Diocletian
protested privately. Daza got
Palestine and Syria. Protecting the rear. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:11,
cont. |
12 |
320 |
thele (soundplay
on He Wills) His
Own Standards of Delight, Will, Purpose |
¨
3rd (final) εὐδοκίαν anaphora benchmark
begins here. Just as the eta
in thelematos
signified Trajan's death (1st benchmark,
117) and then Macrinus (2nd benchmark, 218), with
surprising 'heirs' taking over instead; so too this 3rd anaphora pegs
the eta in thelematos
= 316,
when Diocletian dies. Note
how each deceased's successor UNDOES what the deceased had intended. Hadrian lost
territory Trajan gained, but consolidated imperial
administration that Trajan almost lost;
against dying Macrinus' plan, the Julia sisters
restored Senate control and fractious
leadership leading to civil war; now we see how the Tetarchy dissolves
the Empire within a generation after Diocletian's
death, becoming a shell of squabbling, power-mad, religious types. All in the name of GOD... Click here
for the chrono interplay Paul depicts via this Triune eudokia
anaphora. ¨
So in 308,
stage set for Constantine's takeover, and God's freeing
Christians in SPQR and Parthia. Eusebius writes about
him. ¨
So now Maximian,
enraged his own son-in-law Constantine
won't help, returns to Gaul and tries
to kill him or returns because
Maxentius is trying to kill him.
That same link echoes the usual account that Constantine next catches
the old man trying to
assassinate him, then executes or (stories
conflict) has Max commit suicide,
310. [Gibbon's
story differs (Chapter
XIV, p.353-4 of my 1880 set): says that while Constantine was away
fighting, Max
resumed the purple, seized Arles and its money, on pretext Constantine died. The latter rushed back, besieged Arles,
which then executed Max. But they told
people Max strangled himself. Barnes
says Constantine made up the
assassination story, too.] ¨
Maxentius thus
consolidated his Roman base, got control over his father's old lands. ¨ Then Daza
declared himself Augustus, too.
But he did not compete with Galerius or Licinius. (Some say
he did this just after Licinius was nominated; others, just after Maximian died. The latter
seems more plausible, as Galerius was then weaker.) ¨ Meanwhile,
Constantine plays first version of his in hoc bimbo
game using
PAGAN gods, vision
of Apollo offering him 120 years victory! -- back in 310. So hey:
just change the
WHO and the sign, in 312. Sucker born every minute. ¨
Over the course of a year, Galerius dies of genital
disease (look
for [4] after the '40' in that list), maybe like Herod's: May 311.
¨
[TD Barnes and
some others argue Diocletian died later in 311 (or 312);
but as shown in Appendix II, 316
deserves its mainstream scholar support.
"Lactantius and Constantine" Author(s): T. D. Barnes
Source: The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 63 (1973), pp. 29-46. (You can download it from JSTOR or Scribd.)
I'd bet Barnes' footnote 39 mistakes 'supererat' in
Lactantius 42, as referencing life rather than office of Imperator.] ¨
Daza seizes Galerius' realm, makes a treaty with Licinius to
split it up. Secretly makes nice with Maxentius,
too. ¨
Not to be upstaged by Galerius' dying
edict, in comes 312, a real or expedient conversion and vision
of Christ, surprise surprise in hoc signo mentioribus: Constantine
beats Maxentius (who drowns
per 40[7] in A.Victor), takes
over Italy. God doesn't 'do'
visions, post-Canon. So either it's a hoax, or demons did it to
Constantine. But God
used him, just as God used Pharaoh. ¨
Constantine and
Licinius thus team up, issue the so-called Edict of Milan, February
313. (Compare
page 662 here. Notice how the rulers do not commit to any one idea of
God.) Total
religious freedom, restitution of property that the persecutions
ravaged. Team up in marriage, too,
with Licinius
marrying Constantine's half-sister. ¨
That Edict and teamup form a
massive strategic blow to Daza, who like Licinius
(until the Edict), was busy
persecuting Christians and Jews within his own territories. Now he's the odd man out. ¨ Daza
desperately attacks Byzantium, succeeds, hits Heraclea, Licinius
responding and defeating, Daza fleeing in
disguise, then rallies at Cilician Gates;
by summer 313,
Daia is dead; his wife and kids murdered, too. ¨ But
hey: then Licinius the
former Galerius lackey-persecutor, put the Edict
of Milan in force, within Daia's
former realm. Whew. Home
of Israel and Christianity can finally breathe again. Licinius
spends the rest of the year fighting Persians. ¨ In 313-314, Constantine's
realm, the
fractious Christians huff hot air;
same old games as first century, just like Jews go to Romans
to accuse Christ and apostles;
Christians go to local proconsuls to accuse other Christians -- to
Constantine, who God used to free them.
The seditious Donatists and
the Arians vex him with their quarrels. Going to Caesar, instead of God; just as the Jews, back in Isaiah 36. No Hezekiahs, here. Proof Christianity was in the toilet, just
as Paul shows, here in verse 11. When Constantine
doesn't cave in, they start playing terrorist. Real Christian behavior, huh. Now Diocletian's
edicts, are partly vindicated. It wasn't about faith: it was about political power, using CLAIMS
of faith, to get that power: just as
Revelation 17 warned, back in 96AD.
That was man's 'delight'. But
God used it to fragment attention so Christians could stay free. ¨ Fall, 314 or
more likely, 317: Licinius and Constantine,
alleged pact-mates and brothers-in-law, now war with each other. It's a family thing. Royal Family. Of God.
Ignoring Him. So they battle
and lose lives, Constantine wins, but nothing
resolved. An uneasy truce resumes. ¨ In 315, Licinius seeks to kill
Galerius' wife, daughter, son. This
tangled story's proper sequence might
prove when Diocletian really died.
Gibbon (XIV,
p.367-8 in my 1880 copy) and Lactantius ( d.
M. P. 39-51) say: 1) they
are with Daia, in 311. 2) Valeria refuses
to marry Daia, is robbed, banished, harassed. 3) Valeria writes to
Diocletian (so he's still alive), who in turn
petitions Daia in vain; but then he
dies in battle, with Licinius. 4) They flee to Licinius, who
at first makes nice in order to trick and then murder, all potential
rivals; so they flee him, again. 5) Then
their alleged (not-believable) 15 months'
wandering, then beheaded and thrown into the sea. No one helps, no one mourns. Why?
So much for Constantine's alleged vision and Licinius' alleged angel
! In hoc biblio, ignoramus! ¨ Next
in this sordid soap opera: the scion of it all, broken-hearted Diocletian, dies at
home amid his veggies and stone cold monuments, 3
December 316. 33-year anniversary of the Lord's Birthday
on which Carus died.
Yeah, missed the mark. Some claim Diocles
suicided to avoid being taken by Constantine and Licinius. Click here for
why this 316 date makes more sense. ¨
Just after Diocletian
dies, the boys Constantine and Licinius next
war, autumn - December+ 316, Constantine
again winning by March 1 317. Licinius then
cedes his European territory, gets rid of his co-emperor Valens, in return for his 20-month old son being a
'caesar' with Constantine's sons. ¨ So between 318 and 323, Licinius turns rabidly anti-Christian. Maybe Christians in
his realm aligned with Constantine and Licinius felt
threatened, since his persecution edicts focused on prohibiting
clergy teaching and religious assembly within city
walls, denying military service to Christians. As true under Diocletian, Licinius' rules
are defensive, implying Christians were seditious (search on 'Licinius', here). TD Barnes tells quite
the opposite story. And then explains Licinius'
reversal. ¨ Still
318, back again in Constantine's
realm, the demon-possessed Christians agitate to Caesar (not to God),
to get rid of the Arians. They learned nothing from being locked up,
under Diocletian. Now they are just
like him. ¨
So far, this story is
like the Godfather trilogy, with no good guys. Except, as with Pharaoh, God worked out
His Will for Bible and Christian safety. Now, through 320, Licinius
plays Pharaoh, reneging on his promise; whether in self-defense, or offensive
malice. So he's the last guy to go. Lectio, lectionis. Ego rego, Deum nego. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
14 |
334 |
that
we should BECOME the praise of His Glory |
¨ 321: An
uneasy peace again ensues with Licinius,
while Constantine again deals with the
fractious Christians in his own realm. ¨ Then Sarmatians
attacked; next, Goths; so Constantine had to transit Thrace. Licinius (or
Constantine) made that a pretext to resume war. ¨ 324
through the spring of 325, on
land and sea, they fight. 324 Licinius
finally gives up, is imprisoned but apparently still plotting, so he's
put to death that spring. Sic transit gloria mundi, and qui se non proficit in Doctrine, deficit
in everything else. ¨ Constantine is left as sole ruler, praised by the world's ideas of glory; but
his family still fights him. Now
instead of King Lear, it's the Herods rerun. Constantine
executes his wife and son Crispus,
in 326. Allegations they were 'involved', golly. No male from
his loins will rule, after the first generation. So you are to know this is not God's man,
nor his kids, Deut 28:15-18. ¨ End 324-330, Constantine builds
his 'New Rome', replete with seven man-made hills, Byzantium now renamed Constantinople, thus marginalizing the old Rome; yet aping it. Did no one recall Revelation 17? Or, when Nero and Commodus renamed
everything, what that meant? ¨
This relocation alerts
devout Christians to leave the East. When buildings rise but Word's Freedom
falls, it's time to run: now Church has political control. It spells burnt
Bibles and persecutions for all deemed heretics. The persecuted becomes the Grand
Inquisitor. For Constantine
united church and state, intermittently persecuted
Jews and pagans (search on 'Jew', here). Constantine intended
to control Church; but they,
controlled him and his successors.
So that symbiosis of evil purpose would become permanent, and
undo the Empire. ¨ Of course, Christians then and since imagine they glorify
God by emulating pagans. For Constantine continued
what Diocletian set
in motion, ostentation,
complex bureaucracy to limit power, state-run economy,
persecutions. ¨ Constantine's three
boys are made Caesars on Christmas, 333. God's wit
via Paul is shocking: they didn't know
this convergence; they thought the world was 1000+ years older, than it
was. His successors will war over
Trinity, kill Jews and other Christians, for the next 1000
years. And they will hallucinate
they glorify God. (Or maybe only Constans,
in 333. More ironic.) ¨
This is Paul's 2nd επαινον benchmark. Tie to first epainon
benchmark: in both 133 and 333-334,
a city was razed and a corrupt Roman one, was built atop it. Paul equates Constantine with pagan Rome,
Antiochus IV Epiphanes. City
construction began on 490th anniversary of
Antiochus' desecration of Temple.
Anti-parallel to 1Kings8.
Jews begin
to live there in the 320's,
during construction; thus access to OT Bible in Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic
is available APART from Church control. Click here
for the close of the epainon
anaphora. ¨ So of
course from 332-334, the barbarians
invaded the more. This
fragments state ability to persecute dissent. Whew. |
|||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:12,
cont. |
9 |
34335 |
proelpikotas:
Firstfruits |
¨
Constantine
dies on Pentecost,
337. Of
course, you know 'firstfruits' kicks off the count to Pentecost.. right? Can God be more pointed?? [Firstfruits
begins piggybacked on the last day of Passover week, per Bible, Numbers
28:26. But even if you count it
wrongly, starting the day after first Passover sabbath: 'Pentecost' it still
has the same meaning, even if celebrated on the WRONG DAY; as they did, back
then. Ouch.] ¨
At his father's death, Constantius II spends the
next six months murdering
most of the male family
("massacre of the princes"),
allegedly to prevent usurpations.
Remaining are the three sons, Julian, and Gallus. Both will become usurpers. Gives new meaning to 'firstfruits',
huh. (Chief historian for this time is
Ammianus,
online in Latin or
English.)
So just as God cut out Levi's 'fruits' for cutting out
Shechem males, so too Constantine's male heirs will be cut off. They are: ¨
Constantine II, who
lives 3 more years; he got the West. But wanted the whole empire. He released the jailed Athanasius,
fought with his brothers over Trinity(!), and died in battle trying to take
over the realm of his brother Constans. ¨
Constantius II, who
lives until 361; he would spend his life fighting, too. He got the East, then got the rest. His
laws attack Jews (search on 'Jews', here); in 339, it
is a CAPITAL CRIME for a Jew to marry a Christian, or even to proselytize. That
tells you getting Hebrew Bible, was popular. Again, 334 is
2nd epainon anaphora benchmark. So God
condemns the Church and secular rulers, shows His Purpose
For The Few is yet achieved, by parallel with the first and final
benchmarks. Click here for the timing
interplay via the Triune eudokia
anaphora, for it 'births' the epainon. ¨
Constans, who
only lives until 350. He got Italy, Africa, Illyricum, Macedonia
and Achaea, but after Constantine II
attacked him and died, Constans
inherited the West, as well. Then
he dies. This will put the
Empire under the persecuting Constantius II. ¨
The 'firstfruits' of
Constantine's legacy, was murder
among Christians, too. Arians and
Trinitarians argued, knifed and killed each other everywhere; you argued with the guy mending your shoes,
over whether Christ was God; if you
went to the Hippodrome/Circus Maximus you bet on the Blues or the Greens --
based on whether you were Trinitarian or Arian;
then you might enjoy murder, for dessert.
They would still
be at it, 200 years later (click
then search on 'blues'). ¨ Each sect denounced the other one to the Emperor; and
since now the Emperors themselves were divided between Trinitarian and Arian
-- everyone got persecuted, their dead bodies waved before God, as each
side hallucinated itself as honoring Him.
Dio-cletian, anyone? What became the Codex
Justinianus still contains samples
of their sordid edicts. Full Code here. |
||
9 |
352 |
hearing |
¨ Trinitarian
and spiritually-deaf Constans,
banned pagan sacrifices and involved himself in Church squabbles. 2 Tim
2:26-3:7: always hearing, never learning. So never hearing, even when listening. So the rest of his short life is spent
fighting; he loses empire and life to usurper
Magnentius, in
350. Get this: Constans
previously saved Magnentius from
death due to sedition. ¨ This
fraternal strife -- now allegedly over whether Trinity or Christ is both
God and Man?! -- continues through
352. They and their
colluding, warring popes and bishops, all ignore the NT in Greek,
their native tongue. Ever
hearing, never listening! |
|||
1:13,
cont. |
8 |
360 |
Word
of Truth |
¨
Deafness is contagious. So
is short rule. Usurper Magnentius will
be gone by mid-August, 353. When Constantius II won,
Magnentius suicides,
but only after he first tried to murder his own family. Nice guy. ¨
Meanwhile Constantius
II rules with bad underlings.
By 353 he inherited ALL the territory, so can't be good in so short
a span. ¨
He realizes
his folly in murdering the Constantinian males, so in 355
appoints his cousin, the philosophic
and affable Julian, as Caesar. At this point, Julian,
though raised Christian, has instead adopted an offshoot of
Neo-Platonism; so will write much to argue against
'the Galileans', aka Christianity.
So much for hearing of the Word of Truth! ¨
Julian as Caesar,
repeatedly defeats the barbarians, is loved by the troops; so Constantius
II gets jealous, orders troops redeployed, so to distance them
from Julian;
that, plus the bad underlings, generate so much common resentment, in January
or February of 360, the
army
proclaims Julian emperor. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:13,
cont. |
12 |
372 |
Official
Proclamation of Salvation |
¨
Through 360-361, the
two cousins negotiate, intrigue, avoid civil war. By summer, Julian
decides to fight. Constantius
II arms, too: before they
fight, Constantius II dies in November 361. His
Official Proclamation saved Julian,
named him as successor. ¨
So in 362, the
empire is under one head: Julian, who next openly declares he's pagan but acts like
a saint; institutes some much-needed
governmental reforms -- and begins a Maoistic Hundred Flowers movement for
Christians. He rescinds edicts against
Christians, but claims Christianity is an apostasy from Judaism, cajoles
Christians for murdering their rivals, yet lets them do it, just the
same. Book III
of Theodoret on Julian is biased, but has some details. Read AureliusVictor
for the contra. ¨
When his efforts don't
stop conversions, Julian next
issues
edicts
to stop
Christianity from being taught. He apes Daia's pagan
copycatting of the ekklesia, to structurally
compete with Christians and their good deeds. For he was affronted that patronage
should come from Christians, rather than from the Emperor. Daniel 11:36, anyone? Ooops. ¨
Next year, lured into a desert ambush by
some cut-nosed Persian spies, Julian
dies from a battle wound while trying to besiege
Ctesiphon (thinking himself another Alexander), 26
June 363. On his deathbed, he
claimed to regard death as "union with heavens and the stars." Since he
was a believer as a child, he got his wish: SAVED. Surprise surprise: Jesus lives, after
all. ¨
Succeeding Julian, is
his Christian longtime confidant, named Jovian. Whether by Julian's
dying appointment or troop acclamation, Jovian becomes
Emperor; he cedes most of Diocletian's
Persian gains, to Shaphur
II; then, leads the troops in retreat. He
dies, eight months later, in February 364. (There are conflicting
reports on how he died, whether from bad
food or fumes; he was on his way
back to Constantinople. Eutropius
claims that was the 1,119th year AUC, two years later than expected?) Jovian's writing and edicts show he wanted to restore Church political powers enjoyed under Constantine, plus a food dole; but officially, this brief time was
generally tolerance for paganism, too. ¨
Succeeding him, is Valentinian. During 364, There was protracted negotiation with the army over his
appointment, and he finally specified his brother Valens as co-emperor
to run the East. ¨
This was provisionally accepted. But Valens, new
to power and inexperienced, was more or less hung out to dry, ¨
as Valentinian had
to deal with barbarian incursions in the West. He does so, for the next
ten years. |
||
1:13,
cont. |
7 |
379 |
believing |
¨
Both rulers continue to deal with the
barbarians and usurpers in their empires. The pair also begin to assimilate the barbarians into their lands and
imperial households, rather than merely fight them; in effect, elevate
them within Roman society. Romans
resent 'foreigners' gaining prestige, never mind, it reduced war
expenses. So domestic problems
increase. ¨
Domestic policy under Valentinian was
troubled mostly by taxation revolts, animosity with the Senate, and Christian activists. Valentinian tried to secure the former and
avoid the latter, with uneven
intent and success. ¨
Domestic policy under Valens was
similarly troubled, and he took an active role in alternately persecuting Christian
or pagan activists who were agitating in his realm. ¨
In November 375 , Valentinian,
while negotiating for peace with the crafty Quadi, suffered apoplexy or a
stroke, and died. [p.155 of my MIlitary Encyclopedia
by Dupuy and Dupuy (2nd Revised Edition) says Valentinian was
instead planning his next campaign. Didn't say the source.] ¨
As a result, his Western
empire splits between his two sons, Gratian and Valentinian II, aged
16 and 4, respectively. So now we have
a return to child-Emperors controlled
by the adults over them. Valentinian had
Gratian marry Constantius II's
daughter, the year before; they will
be childless. Both
teenagers would only live another 8 years. ¨
Valens, would only live 3. Tragic story. In 378, the
Huns invaded Goth lands; the Goths
asked Valens for entry; he gladly accepted, to get more troops for
his war with Persia; but the Gothic
resettlement went awry, with Huns and Alani
mixed in; Romans in charge of
resettlement, abused the Goths, who then
revolted; they bested the Romans and
ransacked Thrace. So Valens had
to fight. He met them at Adrianople with
too few troops. Both sides were in
battle position; while in pre-battle negotiation, a Roman unit
accidentally sallied on the field;
this was construed as a double-cross. So both armies fight, Valens
flees and dies, August 9, 261
years after Trajan -- burnt alive in a tower. Rome called it her worst defeat since Cannae. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:13,
cont. |
9 |
388 |
Sealed |
¨
Gratian became Emperor over
Valens' territory, and appointed Theodosius to defeat
the Goths.
On January 19, 379, he sealed Theodosius, as
Augustus. Meanwhile, the pushy Christian priests used Church
as a ultimatum, a weapon: if Gratian
and Theodosius didn't behave by persecuting Jews, pagans and Christians the
priests disliked, the Emperors would be sealed away from entering Church. Despicable.
Here
is a sampling those vile Edicts. Another
sampling. By
contrast, compare this Leviticus
26:3 sealing chronology of
Jerome, beginning also in 379. Then, from 383 and
constantly in 388, he spends the next
20 years making a Bible translation, folks will read for 1000 years; for the
originals he preferred, would soon be locked away. Jerome's would often be the ONLY
Bible in the West, until the Reformation. See, you can't obey commandments you
don't have, so it's a sealed promise of Bible Available. ¨
At this point, God sealed Gratian with
only four more years to live. He spent his life battling or befriending
barbarians, pagans, the Senate, and favoring
Christian activists -- rejecting Pontifex Maximus, for example. This inconstancy sealed his
fate, resulting in mass disaffection
within the Senate, the army (for his preferential treatment of
foreigners and his own lack of military enthusiasm) and
among the pagans; with the result that in 383, Magnus Maximus
revolts with much popular support. ¨
Meanwhile, on January
19 383, Theodosius appointed
his son Arcadius,
Augustus. So now the latter is a
co-emperor. ¨
Gratian dies,
maybe at the hands of Maximus, on August
25, 383. Five years later, Maximus also tries to take over Valentinian
II's territory (Italy, Illyricum, Africa); Theodosius will
arise and defeat Maximus, who then dies on August
28, 388. ¨
So 388 seals the
fate of the Roman empire: consolidated under one ruler whose policies
cause a split; so the West fragments into nations.
There's a final split of alleged popes, too (between Rome and
Alexandria). Bear in mind that both
Roman and Odox brand of popery back-invent their history, each still claiming
to be the 'original' Christianity. That's
why persecutions began: an ecumenical ORGANIZATION was a political threat to
the Roman state; first in Rome, and then in Africa, etc. ¨
Theodosius' Eastern territory had
its back covered for the most part, owing to astute negotiations with
the Persians by that yet-future savior of Rome, Stilicho. He will be betrayed
by jealous
rivals. ¨
On the surface, though, Valentinian
II -- now only 17 --
ruled the West, with the wily Theodosius
having insinuated his own trusted officials within Valentinian's
advisors. Parenting. Four more years. ¨
During that time, Theodosius
creates the Rev 17 monster;
persecutes all non-Catholic Christian sects, especially the Arians. Tyrannical Unity of Church and state is his Seal and
Motto. His successors
would continue such horrible laws. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:13,
cont. |
10 |
398 |
epayyelias:
'promise', really
Heritage Pledge |
¨
Valentinian II was
probably murdered May 392 by
his advisor Arbogast(es),
who expected to be rewarded with rule.
He wasn't. Theodosius smiled a lot, then adopted his natural son Honorius in January
393, to 'inherit' Valentinian
II's empire. Then,
prepared for war with Arbogast;
which was fought, 5-6 September, 394:
ending, with Arbogast's suicide. ¨
Shortly afterwards, Theodosius
dies, too: January 17, 395. Heir and Spare take over. They don't want to pay foreign troops. So their erstwhile general Alaric is
kicked out, along with other Visigoths. So, they turn to protracted rapine. ¨
395 is the famous
official PARTITION of the Roman Empire: nicely fits Paul's
use of Heritage Pledge, dontcha think? For by dividing the Empire officially, Theodosius
hoped to stop all the warring.
Instead, he unwittingly launches the END of the Roman Empire in the
West, for Honorius' rule will be weak. This
weakness preserves believer freedom to learn Bible absent
church-married-to-state control. It will unravel poisonous church-state
unity legated by Constantine. On the surface, it will take another 1000
years to unravel; but European freedom from Church dominance is
founded, here. Quite a pledge, indeed! ¨
Arcadius
rules in the East, and Honorius in
the West, when Theodosius dies.
Well, their regents rule over them, for they are age 18 and 11,
respectively. ¨
Stilicho, a
Vandal, becomes Honorius' regent; Stilicho
marries his daughter to Honorius when the lad is but 14, in 398. ¨
Arcadius'
regent, Rufinus,
wanted Arcadius to marry his own daughter, too. But
Arcadius wanted Aelia
Eudoxia; so another
advisor, Eutropius --
who wanted to oust Rufinus -- arranged the match ¨
while Rufinus
(successfully) negotiated with Alaric, after
Stilicho had chased him into Epirus. That was in 395. Rufinus was
soon murdered by his troops; ¨
a greedy Eutropius
replaced him. Eutropius
and Stilicho were also competitors. So during this same time, Eutropius abetted a rebellion in Honorius'
Africa; the rebellion was put down,
and then Eutropius, too.
The year? 398. |
||
6 |
404 |
arrabon: Down Payment |
¨ The
regents war with each other. As a result,
the barbarians gain more power and independence.. and Bible teaching is freed up in the West.
¨ Barbarians
invade 400 through 406.
Stilicho defeats them and thus saves Rome, each time. ¨ Meanwhile
In the East, Eudoxia helped her husband break from his
advisors, oust Eutropius and then arch
anti-semite John
Chrysostom. Jews gain a bit more freedom, for awhile. But she dies in 404. |
|||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:14,
cont. |
8 |
412 |
inheritance |
In 405,
Jerome completes his translation
of Bible.
He'd disseminated the material with cover letters as he completed each
book(s). He still encounters criticism
from those opposed to Hebrew or to changing the Old Latin. Jerome's translations are then sporadically
quashed or (progressively) permitted, for the next 400 years. ¨
Honorius --
who spent his free time feeding chickens -- now
suffers many revolts and usurpations.
He learns to buy them off. ¨
Stilicho has
to concentrate Roman forces between defending against the barbarians, or
against the usurpations. In 406, he
is obstructed by machinations in the Eastern Empire, so couldn't get enough
money or troops. Stilicho
next changes tactics, demands the East
release the buffer state Illyricum to Rome; where the
thrice-defeated but still alive Alaric,
fled. ¨
Meanwhile, after Eudoxia, Arcadius'
advisors resumed control. Nasty religious laws are passed, Jews are
persecuted, along with pagans and 'heretics'. Barbarian incursions continue; his advisors
adopt a passive stance (build walls, pay tribute). In his last years, Arcadius is
politically absent. General tenor of
rule is 'i don't care' or petty religious squabbles. Siege mentality. ¨
The 31-year-old Arcadius dies in
May 408 of unknown causes. An
Eastern plot to subvert Honorius and
then take over the West, ensues. This, alongside the many Roman usurpers
who carved out Honorius' territory, from 406
onward. ¨
Stilicho, who
is Honorius' protector, is
thus falsely accused of subverting the throne -- clever, accuse your enemy of
what YOU do. The broken-hearted man
doesn't resist capture; Stilicho and son are
executed in August 408. ¨ After
Stilicho, Chicken Boy Honorius has
no good leaders, and he doesn't care, either. For
Honorius, is a Belshazzar in Daniel 5. So next, Alaric, who only wants rights to
settle in Roman lands, thrice besieges Rome;
finally in frustration, he sacks Rome in 410. Alaric dies soon
afterwards. The
East and the usurpers, bide their time.
They're happy Rome was sacked. Zosimus' History,
stops here. So
the ever-bombastic Augustine spends the next 13 years writing City of God: a
churlish, windy defense of Catholicism, despite God's
mene mene tekel upharsin
contra, via Rome's sacking.
BIBLES were in those churches, so Alaric
didn't hurt them. Augustine
alleges that fact vindicates Catholicism, just as Catholics claim THEY decide
Holy Writ. But God protects His Word WHEREVER it is, 1Kings 9 contract, invoked by Daniel 9:19. Even in the stinking churches, Amos 4:10,
Isaiah 1. ¨
Meanwhile, back in 408
Arcadius' orphaned son Theodosius
II ascended the Eastern throne at the ripe old age of 7. ¨
Next, Honorius
enters into negotiations with Alaric's
heir Ataulf; and the Visigoths leave Rome in 412,
accompanied by the daughter of Theodosius I, Galla Placidia. |
||
1:14,
cont. |
6 |
418 |
Redemption |
¨ Still
412: back in the East, Theodosius II's
ugly, anti-semitic sister Pulcheria (search on 'Regency
of Pulcheria'), herself only 15, takes
on government as well as his education.
She urges and enforces brutal Galerian-like laws against Jews, pagans
and heretics. Little Miss Hitler. She makes herself Augusta in 414. Thereafter, she
dominates both him and the Church. Well,
Church uses her, too. (Ugly
false doctrine: Pulcheria loudly
remains a perpetual virgin. Mary was no perpetual virgin, it would be a SIN
to refuse bearing Royal progeny, see 1Cor 7.) So no sons! So thousands die, in civil wars! So an
elderly, innocent female pagan philosopher (Hypatia)
can be brutally murdered by a churchman, without penalty. Krystallnacht mentality with a Redemptrix smile, while ripping a
60-year old pagan virgin's body, limb from limb. In a church. ¨ Here
is a sampling
of those Edicts, against the Jews. (Search on '41' to find the
Edicts of that time.) Here
is a more comprehensive
summary in chronological order, showing the continuity from 395
forward. They multiplied
rituals, too, from this time forward. ¨ So
now Honorius' protectors, are the Visigoths. That
link quotes Ataulf, wanting to be Rome's redeemer; so he will, with Honorius'
blessing, marry Galla Placidia in 414. She bears a son who dies that year, and Ataulf is
murdered in 415. War between the tribes ensues; so now Honorius
teams with Constantius
III (not related to Constantine) and wins, end 416. Galla is
returned to Honorius, who forces her to marry Constantius
III (not related to Constantine) the following
January 1. She bears him a
daughter by end year. In 419, she
bears a son, the future Valentinian III. ¨ When Bible shifts regnal lines to daughters, their
children becoming rulers WHILE children,
God signifies excessive apostasy in the generation replaced. Thus He
keeps His Redemption Inheritance Promise. Recall: the Levitical line went through Daughter
of Levi due to Shechem; regnal line shifted to Daughter of David, due
to Jeconiah curse: hence Christ is
born from Mary. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:14,
cont. |
7 |
425 |
Possession (of Christ) |
¨ Honorius dies
childless of 'dropsy', in 423. (But p. 135 of Roman
Fasti pdf quotes sources that claim Serena was his child, killed with
Stilicho.) ¨ After
a brief interregnum, Valentinian III,
age 6, Galla's son -- becomes emperor, 425. So his mother is regent, dominates him. ¨ On
the Eastern front, not-so-pretty Pulcheria
marries teenage Theodosius II off to another teen, who converts to Christianity and is thus
renamed Aelia
Eudokia in 421; but
not as the linked legend, portrays; obviously the match was important and the
resulting marital relationship strong, for there are many conflicting
versions of it. Click
here for another partly-mythical example. The duller truth is, the young girl was
likely a necessary political compromise
to the nobility (search on
'Regency of Pulcheria'). And, she didn't turn out to be as
subservient as they'd planned.
Moreover, Pulcheria was way too young -- and too jealous -- to pick
such a rival, herself. So legend is
made to justify factions, enchant the masses, hide the machinations. ¨ In 421,
Aelia gives birth to yet another female, Licinia Eudoxia, who
at age 2 is betrothed to Valentinian III, in 423 (see
Galla
Placidia). Thus you know Honorius' succession
was planned by the East and Galla, long before he died.
Likely Honorius himself approved it -- or was forced to approve it --
knowing he would soon die.
Or, maybe he was afterwards murdered. ¨ Soon
after Licinia's birth, the classically-trained Aelia
competes with Little Miss Hitler, Pulcheria. In particular,
Aelia opposed Pulcheria's anti-semitism and anti-pagan policies. (Perhaps
the adults forming Aelia's faction in the palace prompted her, so to disgrace
Pulcheria). ¨ Edicts
persecuting Jews and pagans, stepped up around 415. These continue, with periods of respite, in
the later Theodosian
Code. Sample
Edicts. (Search
on '41', '42', '43' to find the
conflicting Edicts of that time. Read edicts after each search, as
subsequent ones don't repeat the year's date.) Comprehensive
Summary in order, as continued in that Code. Novellae
(Law harmonization with Western Empire). ¨ Their
arguing enables Theodosius to secure a balance of power
between the clergy who support Pulcheria, and
the pagans supporting Aelia. Byzantine politics. You can tell
from the law changes, how the factions won or lost, especially after 421. ¨ Meanwhile,
in 421 Theodosius' guardian and ally,
Persian king Isdigerdes aka Yzdegerd, dies. He had been protecting the realm from
invasions. As a result, the invaders
progressively chip away Eastern territory, or get annual tribute; by Theodosius' death in 450, this
tribute will bankrupt the Eastern empire. ¨ In 425, Jews were effectively
prohibited from practice --
salami-style, much like Hitler would later do -- so
the Sanhedrin was disbanded; so again Jews were dispersed. Paul links this 425
prohibition of Jews to have their own 'patriarchate'-- which effectively
means they can't administer their own religious law -- to the final επαινον anaphora benchmark (syllable=year
425-434). First epainon benchmark was the Bar
Kochba rebellion which had the same result.
The middle benchmark linked the
razing of Jerusalem and rededication as Aelia Capitolina, to
the building and dedication of Constantinople, in 334; as
a result, Jews SETTLED in that area.
The dual-entendre here links this expulsion of the Jews to Valentinian
III's accession. Pointed condemnation of Church and the rulers, who hallucinate they
glorify and praise Him; first with parallel to Antiochus and Hadrian, now
with parallel to Pompey 490 years earlier. So Bible in Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic is DISTRIBUTED AND PRESERVED, by
use of the expulsion.
Click here for the grand
historical interplay between the eudokian and
epainon anaphora. ¨ During
this time, the West has no good forces or leadership, so goes to Theodosius
for troops to defend against many barbarian incursions. But Roman forces are often defeated,
now; the
'possession' is eaten away.
Leprous religion begets leprous politics. At length, Byzantium no longer helps. ¨
Overrun by barbarian
groups, 'Rome' will mostly shrink to the size of Italy. ¨
So in both West and
the anti-semitic, pogromizing East, the Possession is Redeemed away piecemeal
from the clutches of Catholic apostasy;
barbarians build their own nations, and steadily remove territory from
Rome. The tables have turned. ¨ Sad way to wake up to what the Mosaic Law always
commanded, Deut 8:20, Deut 17:14-20. This is why the rulers don't last. They pretend to be acting for Christ but
never learn His Law. The NT upgraded
the OT, did not abolish it. The
sacrifices and Judaic rituals ended, since Christ fulfilled them. As His Body, His Possession, we are to Live
The Higher Law, and everyone -- ruler and ruled alike -- are STILL
subject to it. Especially, if claiming
to be Christian. Thus we see that both Church and State were completely
corrupt, trying to possess everything themselves though in His Name. So God removed His Name from them, Rev
2:5 -- and gives it, to the barbarians. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
||||||
1:14, cont. |
9 |
43491 |
|
Epilogue This
is a very tangled time in history, and pivotal to all the future of Europe,
the US, even today. The machinations
of the Roman Catholic and Orthodox bishops, and the political rulers in this
period are given balanced treatment in Will Durant's Age
of Faith, Chapters One through Six (in my 1950 edition). Durant, a former Jesuit priest turned
communist and atheist, is surprisingly mild in his censures. I can't be. The early Church is guilty of every
crime. And deems herself holy, for it! So is even more guilty, today. All persecutions of Islam and Hitler ape
what you've read thus far. And it only
gets worse, as here we enter the Dark Ages. God's
indictment is against CHRISTIANS, not just a denomination. The priests and leaders of this time merely
reflect general apostasy in Christendom. Bible uses nature of rulers, to
show nature of ruled. So we are to
look in the mirror. West: Galla
resigns regency when Valentinian III
reaches majority in 437; he marries Theodosius
II and Aelia Eudokia's long-betrothed daughter, Licinia
Eudoxia. This match seems to
offer some independence to all parties:
Valentinian, from his mother Galla; Theodosius and Aelia,
from Pulcheria's self-righteous, bishop-browbeating,
dominance. But the royals are
still dominated by their other advisors, since they became Emperors while
still children. So they don't
have outside experience to well test what their advisors say. They only have the skills of intrigue, of
pitting one advisor against the other by appeal to greed. By now, they all intrigue at court, as a
matter of upbringing. Valentinian is
still dominated
by his advisors. In frustration, he
later murders his advisor Aetius, to gain self-rule. The advisor's avengers in
turn murder Valentinian the following year; so at age 36, Valentinian dies
in 455. Licinia Eudoxia bore
him only daughters; she is thus forced
to marry his successor Petronius Maximus. But also in 455, after taking Africa, Geiseric
sacks Rome absent Eastern or Roman resistance; he takes the women with him, maybe with
their advance connivance, stories vary.
One daughter married Geiseric's son. The other two women,
released in 460's, go to Constantinople, not Rome. East: in 429, Theodosius
II at age 28, began a comprehensive reform of Empire law; it was completed in 435, but
not yet published. Seems this was
Theodosius' pet project while under tutelage.
(Maybe he sought refuge from female control by study of law,
having shown a propensity for editing manuscripts while a child.) The rewrite is re-examined and then finally
published in 438 as Codex Theodosianus. No doubt Aelia's
classical training and pro-pagan, pro-Jewish arguments, assisted him. This is about where contemporary Socrates, stops
his history (from Constantine forward).
Theodoret's
History stops at 429. Perhaps to obstruct her former charge, in 431
and at EPHESUS, Pulcheria is
the power behind the ecumenical
council to glorify her own self-imposed
virginity via the new Theotokos movement, and to persecute the Nestorians. Using political wiles to enforce tyranny
of religion with a banal definition of 'faith', abstention from sex! Pulcheria herself
claims to BE the mother of God.
Clearly the rivals for popedom used
her and she them, with no conscience whatsoever. Glorifying themselves, while claiming to
glorify Christ. Just search on
'431' in this
link, read it all for yourself. Despicable. Pulcheria conspired in other ways, too. Theodosius' wife Aelia
Eudokia received accolades for her piety upon return from Jerusalem
in 438. Aelia's articulate
speech and possession of relics -- which were awarded her -- diminished the
spinster's overvaunted virginity. So,
a plot ensues yet again, and by 443, Aelia will
be wrongly accused of adultery over a Phrygian apple, so the myth goes -- she
is age 41 now, probably in menopause and looks like a prune -- yet Aelia is
thence banished back to Jerusalem. You just know there's more to the story. Theodosius II
falls from a horse and dies, 7 (or 9) years later. Pulcheria maybe outlives
him (1 to) 3 years. In 434, Attila
the Hun inherits his father's kingdom in what we call Hungary. Attila laid
waste to eastern Europe, and then prepared to invade the West, partly owing
to an invitation by Honoria, Valentinian III's
banished-for-adultery sister. The East defaulted on owed tribute to the
Huns. Attila
advanced and would
have won in 452, but died from a
broken blood vessel in his wedding bed (with a lesser
female, pending Honoria's
delivery to him). His death resulted
in a scramble for power amid his successors.
This scramble saved both West and East. Meanwhile, either the Vandals or Goths,
control Northern Africa, Spain, most of Gaul.
The Franks would soon overrun them and take over Italy,
too. Britain was somewhat protected
by her seas, but the Goths would be 'invited' there to oust the Picts
and Scots. So by 450 the Roman
Empire of Augustus was either depopulated, or in barbarian control. Rome and Constantinople were now large
enclaves; very like Babylon was, when Gobyras
drained the rivers running through it, and marched in. From the outside, barbarian hordes now
fought each other to DEFEND these enclaves. Within those enclaves, the siege mentality expressed itself in
ever-more-ostentatious art, architecture, dress, lifestyles. Magical medicine, mores, religion; building
the outside, with nothing inside.
Typical declining-society stage. Notice how some Emperors' adoptions or
reigns are precisely marked, even to the syllable (Christ,
Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Hadrian, Macrinus), but
others are lumped. By this we see
when a distinct historical shift
occurs; which means, in the people
of that time. A ruler always stands
for the mindset of the people, in Bible (viz., what God said about
Manasseh in 2Kings 21, 23, 24, and the companion Chronicles chapters). Daniel 9 already established that pattern
of syllabification or clause division, based on Isaiah 53. Paul continued it. So just as Daniel's Track 2 meter stopped
the kings' count at syllable 434 of Dan9:13, so Paul now stops, at 434. Nothing more to say. What happens next, repeats the past. Shamefully. So here in 434,
apostasy so bad, women run the show. So
God's Glory will bypass the politics, the powerful, the self-glorifying
Christian groups and individuals, to instead preserve Bible and those FEW
who actually learn and live on it.
When Bible truncates the story of a life, it's a snub. That's what Paul means, here: these
'rulers' do not determine history. They promenade on and off-stage, are
but extras used to fill out the real
plot: which is, learning and living on Bible: that we be made into THE Glory of Him.
Deja-MacBeth
at the end of every regnal play: Tales
retold by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Witness: even 100 years later, State
plays Fake Church and persecutes the Jews. Despicable.
From here, it's all downhill in the East: ¨ Blume's
translation of the Justinian Code. (Books aren't titled, nor can you search
for keywords; sigh, pdf files are per book.)
¨ The
inferior Scott translation
of Civil Law is still useful, but still absent helpful book
titles. ¨ To
first know the titles, use Krueger's
Latin of Civil Law.
Download it, then look up the titles.
Helpful up-front index, too. ¨ Here's
a later
translation by Clyde Pharr, which you can search, partly view (and buy). Now
we've seen from Christ's Birth to 434,
give or take 1-3 years; most of the year benchmarks are unnervingly
accurate. But there's another track:
from Death, i.e., used with reference to First or Last David; John uses it as
his Anno Domini, in Rev1:1, 33+58 syllables = 91.. playing on Paul's
91, here in Ephesians. |
||
ChronoChart Appendix I Appendix II V3 1-10 10-20 20-27 27-37 37-47 V4 47-56 56-66 66-73 73-77 77-84 V5 84-94 94-105 105-114 114-121 V6 121-133 133-141 141-147 V7 147-157 157-165 165-175 175-186 V8 186-195 195-205 V9 205-215 215-222 222-231 231-238 V10 238-252 252-260 260-267 267-275 275-283 V11 283-291 291-301 301-308 308-320 V12 320-334 334-343 V13 343-352 352-360 360-372 372-379 379-388 388-398 V14 398-404 404-412 412-418 418-425 425-434 |
Meter Notes Conclusions
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Paul's chronology abruptly stops with
(West) Valentinian III at age 15, Roman age of
manhood; and (East), with Theodosius
II at age 33 – whose first draft of Codex
Theodosianus, got done. Theo's big sister ugly Pulcheria, was Little Miss
Hitler, and the Code reflected that. She was fixated on perpetual virginity, so
attacked anyone who disparaged Mary Theotokos.
Yikes. Paul also stops when Attila is
newly King of the Huns; he held the East for ransom, exacted huge annual
tribute from Theodosius; the
East will be nearly bankrupt when he dies 8+ years later. How the
mighty are fallen.
Thus we know how the story ends; we've
heard enough. Typical Greek economy in
plays, you trail off the ending, for it is also a beginning. Cycle.
That's how modern historians treat the period, too: they call (new or old) Rome's kings after
these two, 'shadow emperors'. Note: after Marcian, a Pope
crowns the Emperor (Leo). So forget the East. Nothing worth telling. Thus
Paul's meter, ends.
Roman
rhetorical custom is silence toward the
unworthy. You don't even deign to speak their
names. Rev 1-3 omits 'Rome' too,
reserving her 'seven hills' haughty nickname – for Rev 17. Rome
Old or Rome New, same seven
hills, same loud-and-flashy idolatry masked now as 'Christian', 'mystery' name
for Church. Yeah, Bible is a mystery
to her. Fake Church. There will still be Fake Church in the
Tribulation. Paul but charted why and
how it got started. John, shows how it ends. We see that story with hindsight.
Just as Isaiah 53 charted Israel's future for believers like Daniel to
retrospectively track in his meter, so too Paul pens for future Christians: Know What Time It Is. We learn the same
lesson, in arrears; so we know What Time
it Was, and It Will Keep On Being
Daniel 9:26c, Time Bubble Awaiting
Rapture. Prophecy is designed
to teach, not to make babies drool.
Yeah, but we learn from prophecy and history, that we learn nothing from
prophecy and history. Sigh.
Daniel 9:13 abruptly cut his retrospective
tally of Israel's not-long-faithful kings, at 607 bc. 434 syllables.
Silence, for them. Kings after that were puppets; in 607
Pharaoh Neco placed Jehoiakim on the throne, 2Chron36; Nebuchadnezzar quickly
followed, 2Kings 24. (Battle of Carchemish is in
between.) So Paul apes that style
in a 434-year
unit, too (607+434=1040, David's birth). For the last kings were puppets under women, fourth generation crowned while yet
children. Time to clean house.
Something old, something new,
something borrowed, something blue. A preparing Bride is also 'hidden' hence
'silent', to the outside world. Hopefully undetected, as modesty
requires. She certainly doesn't politick
or do anything independent of her husband, even while betrothed. For that would dishonor Him. In ancient times, the royal betrothed female often moved into the groom's family, while
quite young; was cloistered, protected, raised in her future family's customs,
language, property, etc. In
short, privately trained years before nuptials, so that married life will be
natural and comfortable for her.
Church as Bride, is New. Psalm
110 is the basis for Church's Bridal Contract, as the Book of Hebrews
explains. The writer also ties Our
Contract to its Juridical Impetus, which
is always based on precedence. What was it? OLD Israel had
rejected HER contract, which of course God foreknew, promising her a New Covenant, Jeremiah 3:16, 31:31-34 –
around which the writer of Hebrews, built his letter. When he gets to the climax of Hebrews 8-10,
he invokes Jeremiah 31 to show how the 'two walls' of Ephesians 2, the 'grafting' in Romans 9-11, all
fit together. We 'join' (Levi, how cute)
Israel at her abrogation point. Join.
Not 'replace'. Two walls,
not prolongation of the First One. Israel
was to be First Bride, but Vashti refused to Come. So Matt 22, now Father sends Spirit out among
the highways and byways, seeking Esther-Church – and by the way, fulfills
His Promise to the Gentiles in a different
manner.
So we were a 'mystery', 'hidden' in OT; maybe Israel would Accept Him when He
Came. Hidden, for maybe He'd NOT pay for us, maybe He'd not want to pay, at
all. Of course, HE is SOLE Beneficiary
of ta panta, Everything, Isaiah
53:10-12 contract. So it was up to Him,
how many sins would be 'hidden' in Him by Father's imputing stabs on the Cross. Which He bore silently, in pitch black conditions.
All we heard, was Him screaming Psalm 22 over and over – so we'd know He
was still ALIVE and PAYING. Then when He
finally dies, He tells us He won: tetelestai, it is finished: into Your Hands I deposit my spirit, Oh God of
Doctrine/Truth (Ps 31:5).
Meter Notes Conclusions, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So the Bride = Body of Believers, whether
old intended or newly-sought -- belongs to Christ; HE is SOLE Beneficiary of ALL covenants,
Isaiah 53:12, Eph 1:10, Gal 3:16,20. All
is HIDDEN IN HIM. We are part of what HE
inherits, not the other way around; any
inheritance we get, is IN Christ, UNDER Christ, WITHIN Christ, FOR Christ,
all-things-to-for-by, Him (Colossians 1:15-27). So: Israel is part of HIS inheritance; so are we.
Hence, TWO walls
for ONE Christ having TWO Kingships: a) the primordial Kata-Melchizedek,
under which we belong; and b), His later
Jewish
Royalty, under which Israel belongs. For no one replaces Christ. Israel's
inheritance was IN the b) promise to Son of David, 2 Samuel 7, Hebrews
3. And, she is. But we get a 'better' promise (Attic kreittwn, used in Hebrews) – we are
under His a) Psalm 110 Guarantee, Kata-Melchizedek
King-Priesthood, a Battlefield Royalty for beating Satan via the Cross:
Hebrews 2, 5-10. Two kingships. One inheritance. One Christ BENEFICIARY, Irreplaceable,
Hebrews 10 and 12. Kinda like the Roman Empire at the end, but without two
rulers or succession problems (smile here).
His yet-hidden
human kingdoms, are two; but each kingdom covenant's TIMING, governs who is in
which kingdom; for there was always but
ONE covenant operating at a time. They join, but never overlap. So what
Israel lost, was her potential inheritance under the a) kata-Melchizedek
Covenant, to commemorate His Victory over SATAN. Any Jew who believes in Christ now, however,
gets a), not b). Again, each covenant
has its own TIME. Just as, were you born
in early AD 800's France, you'd perhaps be in Charlesmagne's kingdom; but today if in France, you're under the
Fifth Republic. Different time,
different covenant, same territory.
So, back in the OT,
Israel got the Mosaic Law, to train for that potential a) role; the b) role was always promised Unconditionally Through David, 2 Sam
7; so it didn't matter how she voted for
purposes of the b) inheritance, when He came.
It only mattered how HE voted. If He voted successfully on the Cross, He
would still be King of the Jews; He was even crucified, in that Status. So
her negative vote, lost her the potential of ALSO inheriting under His
Primordial a) kata Melchizedek
title. She (OT, Trib,
Millennial believers) will instead become 'friend' of the Bride under the a)
kingdom. For on the Cross Christ fulfilled the Law, Romans 10:4; so now His a) kingdom must first be populated to completion; the b)
kingdom's covenant is abrogated for now, Hebrews 7:12-18; it will be reinstated post-Church, Revelation
7ff, Ezekiel 37ff. At that point, under
Him in the a) kingdom, we rule Gentile nations, Rev 1:5-6, 5:10. He will rule b) Israel; and via her, the world.
So back in the OT,
Israel knew there was a 'mystery', a 'hidden' ambiguity, related to the
Gentiles and the a) covenant. Psalm 110, Isaiah 9+, Jeremiah 31 and Daniel
9:26 all related to Harvesting Gentiles;
but how would God do it? Bible was silent
on the a) covenant's provisions and mechanisms. Was it to be under
Israel's b) covenant? Or beside hers, b) ? People knew only the
amount of time: a 50-year period that Pentecost/Jubilee represented, mostly to
pay back for Abraham's too-early maturation;
hence the syntactical gap in Daniel 9:26-27, lack of detail in Jeremiah
31, passing references in Isaiah 9, 53 etc.
Jews did know the ambiguity was a warning she'd lose the a) status to
the Gentiles. But also, that same ambiguity meant even if she failed a), she'd
still get b). The Gentiles were always 'folded in'.
But under what covenant? Jeremiah
merely said was that the Law would be WRITTEN on everyone's hearts, all would
KNOW God. But what Law, if the covenant
was NEW? Even Peter and James were confused in Acts 15. (Jews today reckon a besideness that later becomes an underneath-ness, hence their terms 'common
era' and 'Queen of the Nations'.)
But "now" -- Bible keyword for
Church Age, i.e., Ephesians 3 -- musterion
is our Silent Betrothal Training, post-salvation: Spiritual Beauty Treatment. Spirit uses Book (John
14) to make His Head in your head (1Cor1:5,
Rom12:1-3), so the 'hidden' can be KNOWN to the group IN CHRIST. Whether Jew or Gentile, Galatians 3:28.
The problem: one must
actually learn the 'NEW' material of the a) kingdom's 'law'. Those who deny, ignore or mangle it to b)'s
rules, will not learn; will instead,
miss the Eph 4:13 maturation goal. Saved, but retarded, Phili 3:18-19, 1 Cor
3:15. As God has Paul prophesy
here, we won't learn it. We
want 'old', waaah!
So.. aposiopesis. Silence. Truncated Church at 434
syllables = years. Ends with a teenager
ruling the 'West'. Over the East, a sister-dominated young man whose empire was
a HUN vassal, who loved old manuscripts, unluckily born to the purple. Plus, a new Hun ruling him financially, who soon
dies in his marriage bed. New faces; same old b) misuse of Bible persists, Even
Until Now. Sigh.
If they want to stay deaf to My New Royal Law, let them be peasants in My a) Kingdom. Forever.
Meter Notes Conclusions, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Hence Church
is always the '56' of history. Same pregnant 14 'issue' as
Israel experienced. Greek
plays end with a moral, which Paul reserves for Ephesians 1:15-23: Learn
And Live On Bible. Pray, 2 Chron 7:14. For Paul is still writing in 56 AD by his
accounting, so there is Time To Change
what's forecast. It's foreknown, but
never forced. That's why we get
prophecy. That's why the Jews got it, too.
Like them, we never listen. So
now, here in 2012, we find all this proof we ignored God's warnings about our future, simply because we imposed a standard on
Bible that if OUR idea of 'meter' isn't visible, they ain't none.
We didn't even bother to count syllables, see if there WAS a pattern. So, that carefully metered future, shamefully
came to pass. Then You will
Know I Am God, when what I
told you long ago -- with precise, biting, wit – later occurs.
And so it goes. Same wrangles today, as under Clement to Theodosian. We ignore the two walls, claim rather to
'replace' Israel; so in effect, claim to
replace Christ's Own b) Inheritance! Sigh.
Yet we have a better covenant under a), which we keep ignoring. We are still DEAF to Him. So, no growth. We're merely too tired from 2000 years of
religious war, to go to arms. Yet we can
still Grow And Pray. Eph 1:15-23 is a prayer, closing at 3:21. Church Age, is between. So per Eph 4-6, we can still grow and pray
that our cycle not be so bad, as prior. Every 490 years, just as Daniel prayed, so
does Paul.. and so should we. The
world's weal, depends on it.
Like
Isaiah, Daniel and Mary before him, Paul's meter parses King Events, as Church is hidden kingmaker, 'salt'; he timed each clause, word and even syllable,
to points in ruler reigns. Augustus
initially adopted Tiberius at EulogeTOS, Eph
1:3; Augustus dies at tou kuriOU, next
clause; Tiberius dies at syllable 37;
then, Caligula reigns. Etc. Paul reserves biting allusions for
boy rulers: Caligula (epou), Nero (kataboles),
Commodus (ploutos), Severans (eperisseusen,
musterion, proetheto, oikonomia);
Decius (kairw, as if Time were a verb),
Diocletian (all syllables 284-316), Constantine & Co. (see Appendix
I below). 7's --
Trib-quality trouble -- cover Vespasian-Domitian (katenwpion autou);
Alexander+7 usurpers, each murdered (hen proetheto en autoi); then
Diocletian-Constantine (tou ta panta energountos). Each 7 is
split nearly like both halves of the yet-future, Tribulation.
Paul
never benchmarks any Christian our deaf Church history calls 'father' or
'great'; but he often tags events giving
rise to 'mother church', in pregnant terms (musterion,
pleromatos); especially, via anaphorae meters (see Appendix I). Daniel benchmarked David's reign severally;
thereafter, he tied kings to their
prophets, dividing when kings were negative or positive to those (often
unnamed) prophets. Paul singled out Christ on two tracks, the shoulda-been
40 years versus His actual 33; so when Paul wrote pneumatikei,
Christ was Risen and Pentecost, begun.
But everyone else, is satirized.
Constantine's own death is PROELpikotas,
Harvest Incomplete ! Poor
man died on Pentecost, so that allusion really smarts. Constantine had but ONE
generation of sons. Daughters
lasted but one more generation. Ouch: apostasy bad. Jeconiah Curse.
No
so-called 'pope' is benchmarked, either.
Christ said Our Kingdom is not of this world; yet the apostasy began circa 96AD, as soon as
John was exiled to Patmos. Hot to take
over, deaf loudmouth Clement
of Rome instantly grabbed at the Corinthians, spouting Bible to
impress; thereby proving, he fathomed nothing he quoted. For he thought the verses he spewed, meant we-replace-Jews-and-apostles (1
Clement). So he didn't know 1
Corinthians Chaps. 1, 2, 7, 11, 12, and above all, Chaps. 13-15 -- though he quoted from the book. He didn't grasp ANY of the Old Testament, and
proved he didn't grasp Ephesians 1-4, Hebrews 5-10, Galatians 3-5.
Of
course if he had Revelation, he didn't comprehend it at all. Or refused to. Or
wanted to blunt its effect, if the Corinthians already had it. That latter guess makes sense, given that
Clement haughtily NEVER MENTIONS John. For God snubs Rome, naming only 'seven
hills' in Rev 17 – to stress the snotty attitude of Rome's patriarchs as
'founding families' of those hills; akin to snobby Americans preening how they
are Daughters of the American Revolution ('DAR'). Blechh.
Clement was by no means alone. In the wake of no-Rapture,
disappointed Christians and Jews – for Rapture had to be unpredictable, it was not
Jewish – all these folks, splintered. Their impatience already started in Paul's
day: people wanted Rapture NOW! You see their We Want Rapture Now problem in 1 and 2
Thessalonians, 1Cor 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13-15; Romans 9-12, here in Eph 4-6,
Philippians 2 and 3; then end 2nd Peter, Jude, whole book of Hebrews
(that's why it's written), 1John 2-4, and of course Revelation 1-4. End Canon.
That last book was supremely painful; it
comes out the very last year the
Tribulation was expected to occur, per the old Jewish schedule (John's
Rev 1:1-3 is a metered dateline of AD
91). Ouch: the Lord cudgels
Christians for having become superficial, political, caving into popular
pressure; our 'faith' early degenerated into politics, visible piety, pushing
'Christianity' into the pagan face. We
were too soon anti-semitic, claiming to replace Israel. Just like Clement.
Meter Notes Conclusions, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
So Rev
17 makes Clement's deaf anti-semitic group the 'poster boy', when
it rose in AD 96; but everyone got a bad
report card. John upgraded Paul's 'musterion': Current
Deaf State-of-Church Bulletin. Groundhog-56-day
current, always the pregant Eph1:10a's 14 outside-the-91
quarters, cliffhanger. Will that initial 56 in verse 4, EVER JOIN to verse 10a's 14 syllables, to Complete The Vote and hence.. TIME? Same rhetoric as Moses posed in Psalm
90:16-17, 'establish the work of our hands' to finish Temple. But "now" (Church Age term), it's
the 2nd wall of the Eternal Temple of Bodies, Eph 2. Current, to let everyone know Clement & Co. weren't fooling Christ Who
Now Has ALL the Keys; prophetic, to
show Clementine putsch successors
would vex nations, till Shiloh Come. Just as foretold a generation prior – when
Clement was still a physical baby,
too -- in Ephesians 1:3-14.
Paul's
AD 215 'musterion' moment? When Demetrius invented the 1st
list of Peter as a bishop in ROME; sold by Julius Africanus, Hippolytus – all
to oust Origen and compete with Rapture-Expecting
Christians. Oh: and do the list to sell the Severans on Christ! Sorta.
John but made that future textually blunt, 126 years prior. Ouch: 126 years after Isaiah wrote Chapter 53,
Temple went down. So, raze
Byzantium, next. New Rome, which we call Constantinople, created with seven
new hills, to ape old Rome. Aped
politics, even Rev 17 scarlet-and-purple, no read so no red Cross considered; yet soon quite red in New
Rome's streets, as Christians cudgeled each other if either Blues (Trinitarian) or
Greens (Arian), lost in Circus Maximus.
That behavior fits the polemical, goofball Christian Hall of Shame writings.
Silly stories emulating fake Gospels claimed of Peter; or Infancy,
Hermas, Thecla. Same slapstick in Koran
or Book of Mormon, centuries later. As if penned by the same mind.
So now
you know why persecution had to occur. Christians baiting
authorities. Insulting them. Begging to
be killed. Killing each other. Making their faith a political cause. Appealing to Caesar. If you are maturing in Christ, you don't
do these things. You quietly learn and
live on Bible. But just as prolifers
politick to Caesar but not God today;
so too, self-righteous babies of 1st through 4th
centuries, preened and pouted and put themselves in harm's way. No wonder Rapture hasn't occurred. What about 1 Peter 5:5-7? All the 'ask anything in My Name'
verses? Well, James 4 explained: you don't ask, so you don't get; you ask for the wrong reasons or when in a
state of sin, so you don't get. We
don't get, since we try to do it ourselves. For we LIKE being peasants, so don't trust God. So persecutions, Clean House.
So we
know the so-called 'Church Fathers', didn't tamper with Bible's Greek text;
they were too ignorant of its meaning. They
surely didn't know what Paul says. They
preserved Bible as a dead-finger relic, a magical thing -- and learned it? Not at all. Rather, a few scattered folks, probably
scribal monks, did learn and kept quietly growing; for to get Bible back then,
you had to be a monk or nun or duke who could pay for a copy. Or, inherit it from someone. Common folk were read Bible snippets. Scripture
was jealously kept away from the masses, instead of being taught them. When we're all in heaven, we'll learn who
these real heroes, are; for they made huge sacrifices to be
near a Bible they could daily study.
They're the hidden few proelpikotas,
Buying Time; the Preparing Bride. So we are still here!
We can
be sure they were not Jeromes, Augustines, Tertullians, Origens or anyone we
call famous, now. For the famous writings, are fatuous. Eloquence without substance; bombast without basis; kindergarten theology, signifying little
grasp of Bible read. Mature Christians don't hold councils on whether Christ is
God or Trinity, valid; and they
certainly don't petition any government, to preside! Only deaf donkeys
do. These folks' writings, prove them
donkeys. Maybe what's written in their
name, is invented. One hopes the real Ignatius wasn't such an
ignoramus; hopes, the real Justin
Martyr, was not bombastic or anti-semitic. Maybe some martyrs did mature; but
what we have written, is by fools. The mature don't seek martyrdom: Christ
didn't throw Himself at Pilate or the Sanhedrin. Only brutish baby
Christians, seek martyrdom to quell their guilt; petulant, political, obsessed
to claim self holy. The mature, are rather too busy just looking at Holy
Christ: in His Word.
And that's Paul's message here, which of
course is obvious from the text: History rides on the few learning Bible, the proelpikotas, not Constantine & Sons; certainly not, on deaf, loudmouth,
scheming bishops inventing 'succession', nikw-lawing over everyone,
bastardizing Old Latin to justify beheading Matthew 16:18, putting Peter's head
atop Christ's. Such Nicolaitans will be
rock bottom in Heaven's Society, just
above the King-James-Only Bible Nazis, who claim God couldn't keep His Word
until 1611.
At the
top of Heaven's Society, will be a few God-grown kings almost no one knew, down
here; who are crowned due to a lifetime
of Learning and Living on Bible. Completing
the Vote so Time will complete, the '56' of History becomes 70, at last! While the current,
perennially-deaf Christian generation stays apostate, till Shiloh Come.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, Appendix I
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse
3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian God's
Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix
I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History
We already saw, in the eudokian anaphora
Verse Note, how Paul made the eudokian
anaphora 'birth' the epainon; how the two sets of anaphora relate textually,
to our vast inheritance in Christ. Paul
also uses that same intertwined structure to reveal the TIMING. For
the devil is always in the details: HOW
will it get done?
Hence two forces are accounted, by weaving the anaphora
within the chronology: A) faith freedom aka Autonomy, and B) Word Preserved, aka Bible. So Paul creates a
piggybacked, interactive meter, weaving eudokian and epainon
anaphora together, to show when and how Autonomy of Bible comes
together; even despite massive Christian apostasy for the duration of the
Church Age, as really and prototypically evidenced by its first 400+ years -- deliberately
like the period from Jacob's entry into Egypt until the Exodus. This is John's point of departure in
Revelation 1 and 17. The Book of
Revelation is based on Ephesians 1:3-14's history, since that's how His Story
Post-Crucifixion, results in the building of His Body, post-Crucifixion. All in answer to, His Prayer in John 17. Let's see how Paul tells that story.
o
First eudokian anaphora runs between syllables = years 105-121. Trajan and Hadrian. Birthing the Adoptive
Emperors, deemed a 'golden age'.
o
This first anaphora thus has a witty title, taken
from the phrase before the anaphora begins: huiothesian,
Sonship. The
Goal of God's Good Pleasure.
o
Paul thus reminds the reader of Isaiah
53:10-11 and Romans 8, God's Contract to Make Sons: for that is precisely what
the three eudokian anaphora
represent.
o
Second eudokian anaphora,
syllables=years 215-231, is
the time of the Severans.
Specifically, of the Julia sisters who
were regents for their emperor kids. This period is known as the Crisis
of the Third Century, which some historians date back to 193, and
others date from 235, when Severus
Alexander is murdered.
o
Its title from the preceding clause: musterion. This stands for pregnancy. The women run Empire, for their
kids. This fact ticked off both army and
Senate, eventually.
o
Distance between first
and second benchmark is 126, pregnant number used in Isaiah 53 (short video)
for the countdown to Diaspora. (Longer video with
explanation on meter as prophetical calendar.)
A
pregnancy is 'hidden', in that the fetus cannot be seen. Idea of work-in-progress, which is
messy. Construction pending. Only the 'mother' knows the content, and of
course the immediate family. Us. And what's being constructed? WORD, Galatians
4:19, Colossians 1:25-27.
So that classic meaning to
musterion, and Paul's parallel to Isaiah 53:10-11, is
very clear, wry, witty.
Especially, since here in verse 9, he's setting
up the pleromatos language in verse 10, the wit being Chronos
who eats his progeny. Get the
pun? No? Paul used it already, in Galatians
4:4, and 4:19. John uses that pun, see
Revelation 12. There, Satan is depicted as acting like Chronos, since
the Jews -- the people from whom Messiah springs -- are made the Basis Of Time,
Deut 32:8. So
in Revelation 12, Satan is depicted as trying
to swallow up the believer kiddies as soon as they are born. Born from Israel, yes it's literal in Revelation
12; but in the broader
sense, Galatians -- we are all sons of Abraham,
through faith -- so Satan wants to swallow us up, too. So Paul is at pains for Christ to be BORN IN
the Galatians -- they are born so He can be borne in them so His Thinking can
be born in them, not merely positional salvation. But, experiential sanctification.
o Hence our eudokian anaphora ends in verse
11, syllables=years 308-320. Time of Constantine, the guy
who nearly killed Bible, by uniting Church and State.
o Its title
from the preceding clause, is energountos, God the
Actor: same verb Paul pregnantly used in Romans
8:28. Labor. Rape of the Cross causing Birth of our
Salvation, me amal naphesho, Isaiah
53:11 -- our imputed sins 'met' by His Counter-Thinking Doctrine (b'dato
yatsdiq), hence pregnancy and birthing ON the Cross, messy during
construction -- and in history, John
17:14-17 prayer Answered, coming together to birth Word
Preserved. So to Answer to the rest
of that same prayer, John 17:21-26. For that
is Ephesians' theme: How John
17, Gets Done. (Remember,
content of John 17 was known long before John wrote it.)
o Distance between second and third benchmark is 105; sum is same 231 syllables, as in Daniel 9:24-27: how Church is used to Bridge Time, to
Tribulation.
So the eudokian
anaphora's syllables=years, trace the TIME PATH of A), faith
freedom: how God creates Autonomy to
Learn Word, despite devilish rulers.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, Appendix I, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st
epainon 2nd eudokian
2nd eudokian God's Meaning 3rd eudokian 3rd eudokian+2nd
epainon 3rd eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 1st eudokian, continued
So what
'story' does the structure of the eudokian anaphora
meter, tell?
o
First eudokian 'stop'
was years 105-121. Theme? Huiothesian,
Sonship. Paul timed the eta
in thelematos, to Hadrian's
accession; it was always contested,
as you saw back in 114-121, William
Dodge Gray's book. God's Adoption
Contested, tied to the Imperium.
Clever parallel to succession wars among apostate
Christians then, Rev 1-3.
o
Trajan was ruling. Trajan, like Nerva, was
focused on SONSHIP, succession, continuation of Empire. To that end, Trajan found
himself warring.
o
He was too successful. He overextended his rule to the Persian
Gulf. He learned he couldn't hold onto
his gains. (Like,
Alexander.) So Trajan turned
back. And died, on the way back. Not before, caving into Ignatius'
egoistic pleasure over
martyrdom. Trajan's perplexed over the
fractious Christians, shown in his letters to
Pliny.
o
Thus Trajan unwittingly brought the Roman empire to the
brink of destruction (p.189,
William Dodge Gray), due to concentrating his troops in the East, leaving the West
insufficiently defended.
o
Moreover, by relying on the Senate, Trajan let
leadership fragment at home. The
Senate was always preoccupied with greedy in-fighting. That's why a Caesar was necessary. Hence as a republic, Rome never could support
itself in such grandeur; it
needed constant imports of outside labor, won by force,
maintained by colonization; this it
could not have, absent a strong unifying hand, managing such outside
assets. Since Rome was haughty about
being Rome, it didn't value barbarian territory, except for the money. So Rome was content to let a Caesar manage it
all, so long as he gave them due deference.
o
Trajan was forced by warring,
to be an absentee landlord.
Absent the structures Augustus had
put in place, Rome would have collapsed into petty fiefdoms.
o
Hadrian saw all that. In 114+, he
was in Syria, backing up Trajan's forces, witness to the Jewish
and other uprisings in the wake of Trajan's
too-fast gains. Witness to Senate's
infighting, via letters from Plotina (Trajan's
wife), and from others.
Witness to Senate's own hatred of Hadrian, for
actually having a brain. Witness to how
the culture of Rome would fragment, if outside cultures
possessed for security and money, were allowed to penetrate Rome.
o
So to protect Rome's future,
upon his own accession Hadrian reversed his adopted
father's occupation policy; by instead, consolidating gains. Hadrian thus
traveled all over the Empire, reforming the administration, rather than
fighting. Hadrian
focused on succession, not only naming Antoninus (later
'Pius') long in advance -- but telling Antoninus who he
had to name as his own successors.
So too, Christians were soon busy aping Ignatius, reversing God's New Testament policy in Hebrews
9-10; instead, inventing
'succession' ideas based on jewishness; to wit, Hegesippus
and his pal in Bible ignorance, Irenaeus.
o GOD thus
used the time, to disseminate the Word to
make sons for The Son, John 17:14-17. Canon had
just been completed in 96. Now it was time to consolidate and transmit,
protect it -- what Hadrian wanted for Rome, GOD wanted
for the world. Leviticus 26, alive and
operating. For it's kinda hard to study Bible, if you're beset with
invaders. Christians
of this time were extremely fractious, though. They persecuted each other, and the fathers
of apostasy we wrongly laud as 'Church fathers' were
the chief culprits. Bible was
being collected and disseminated, but the rival factions differed over what
books were from God, so real Bible books
were often destroyed, as apostate factions fought with each other. Rome had a hands-off policy toward religion;
under Trajan and Hadrian, Christians got no
protection. So many Christians FLED, taking Word with them. Hence, protected it. They had freedom of travel, as Rome was at
peace.
o
Under Hadrian, Jewish fractiousness caused
loss of favor they had since Nerva. Accounts
here conflict. A
dubious legend (older
version) or
logic claims Hadrian allowed rebuilding Temple and Jerusalem, but he later
reneges. The
Jews react, culminating in Bar Kochba revolt. More
likely, while Hadrian
toured, he ordered Jerusalem rebuilt, but
on pagan terms -- which the Jews initially misread as Jewish
terms. This 114-121 ends
the first eudokian anaphora benchmark. Cliffhanger.
Meter
Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, Appendix I, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 1st eudokian,
continued
o
Now, Paul links up the eudokian first stop, with the epainon first stop, syllables=years 121-133. So now Autonomy, links
to Bible. Now EVERYONE had to go into Diaspora, taking the
Word with
them. Now do you see why
Paul writes 'INTO the Praise of the Glory OF His Grace'?
o
epainon
anaphora meter: 334-133, 67
threes; 434-320, 38 threes. Sum = 105
threes or 45 sevens = syllables (years) in Daniel 9:14 through 19. (See Note F in http://www.brainout.net/DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF.) The 38
threes also = God's Meter in Daniel
9:25-26. So
Paul parallels then-future CHURCH history, with those
passages. Telling you what KIND of Time
it will be.
For the
epainon anaphora covers B), for Bible. How it's Birthed, nurtured, protected,
despite apostasy: the many copies bastardized, kidnapped, torn, burnt, mangled
over the ensuing centuries. For
how can anyone praise God absent a Word?
You can't know Him or praise Him, if you don't have His Thinking. And since the world's weal depends on that Word being set before us, First Incarnate, then
into our heads -- well, then world
history is based on how
the Word's history is
going. When the Word is
well accepted, history is at peace. When
not, history is at war. When Christians
reject Word -- as they do, here -- then war for the
rejectors, and peace for the acceptors, just as God via Leviticus
26 and Deut 28, long ordained.
So if
you accept Word, you FLEE those warring. You don't participate in 'Christian'
political games, you don't advertise; you Just Study Word. To do that, you leave society, at least
mentally. Which many then do,
prompted by Razing Of Jerusalem, as this first epainon
anaphora bookend, introduces. So many, run;
later, they'd become monks, nuns or menials working near Bibles. For Bible was progressively put under lock
and key; you counted yourself lucky if you saw it during services, got scribal
discards. So that's what many did:
quietly fit in, inwardly reject 'church' hierarchy as it grew. Some got Bibles
they could keep -- then God enabled them to leave. We know this given the monasteries that grew,
and laws to control them. So there was popular opposition.
So our
first epainon anaphora bookend, is 121-133, when
the Bar Kochba rebellion, commences. Time to flee; the warning signs to leave were there long before 132,
given Hadrian's presence and stated posture.
No wonder Paul allotted 12 syllables to the clause. That is where we leave it, for the moment.
o Next,
2nd eudokian anaphora, syllables = years 215-231. This tangled time covers the Severans. Severe.
Starts with Severus' son Basins, aka Caracalla, who
was executed by Macrinus, who was executed by the plotting Julia
sisters -- musterion, aha! -- resulting in, Heliogabalus. Hidden too, were dingdongs Julius Africanus
and Hippolytus; they courted the Julias
by inventing a
Peter-first-in-Rome bishop list;
intended also, to oust Origen and the Rapture-touting Christians in
Rome. For the first time the word
'catholic' is used; Roman Callistus claims HIS church was 'catholic'; (a different)
Hippolytus retorts that instead HIS was the true 'catholic' church.
o The
year? 218. Paul again marks it with eta in thelematos, same as
he did for Hadrian. That's when
Macrinus dies; and what he intended to
build, reverses.
o So we
are to understand a parallel between 218 and 117. What is it?
Well, if you read the Severans link,
you'd know: SONSHIP. The whole basis for empire was a
constitutional murk. So any claimant had
but two options: be the 'son' of the
currently-accepted Imperator, or be acclaimed as the
successor by the army. After Tiberius, the
army had a deciding role. Nerva sought
to end that, by naming an heir, right away. This lasted until Commodus, who
was murdered and then the army became kingmaker, again. But this time, Septimus -- a superstitious
man who bought the army's acclamation through his wife -- sought to claim a
kind of sonship from M. Aurelius (even if via Commodus), to
solidify that claim. So we see the Adoptive
Emperor mechanism birthed with Nerva
forward was accepted, now with 100 years' precedence to legitimate it. How
ironic: Hippy and Juli baby sold the
same succession lie to the Julias, so to win them over to Churchinanity!
o Hence Paul ties SONSHIP as the theme, here at
the second eudokian benchmark, which of course is the Real Play going
on -- making sons from the Son of God Who Became the Son of Man and fathered
our salvation. While everyone else, Christian and pagan alike, is busy inventing
sonship, successorship, out of thin air.
Meter
Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, Appendix I,
continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 2nd eudokian,
continued
o Fathering,
then requires mothering. Hence musterion, the title
of this second eudokian
benchmark; for the sons are too
young, so the mothers actually rule.
o Background: Septimus
himself had died; heir/son Caracalla murdered brother Geta,
bankrupted Rome; then made everyone in
the provinces a Roman citizen, so he could collect extra taxes from them; then Caracalla was
murdered by usurper general Macrinus:
who had no noble or sonship tie, he
honestly told the Senate.
o Lies
win: Septimus lied,
claiming relationship to Commodus; so new lies now, by the mothers: claiming incest, that Heliogabalus (aka Elagabalus by
historians) and/or the younger Severus Alexander, were Caracalla's
kids. Paid by the Julia
sisters, army murders Macrinus, and
the ladies' sons take the purple. Helio baby
adopts baby Alexander. Then
one sister conspires with her mother against the other sister, gets Helio
murdered and now pious Severus Alexander rules. Well.
o
Equating Deity and Motherhood gave
the imperium a blessed-by-the-gods sanctity; this cultic idea was part of Roman culture,
i.e., the Vestals were among the most respected religious
persons. The Julia
sisters were of a rich priestly family from Syria
(where Hadrian was stationed when he got word he was
adopted). To be ruled by a mother
and too-young son, rankled both army and Senate. By 235, they
were ripe to rebel, due to troop casualties and concessions Alexander's
mother made to the Persians in 231; and finally
to the Germans, in 235. So, the army then murdered him.
o So now too, lie of MOTHER
CHURCH is invented. Thus Paul uses musterion, to title
this 2nd eudokian benchmark. 1st benchmark, Bible still matters to
Christians; so too in the secular realm, Senate still matters to Emperors, who constitutionally
derive their legitimacy, from it. So
here, 2nd benchmark, eta in 2nd
thelematos: Christians don't value Bible, but instead nikolaus, their
'bishops'. Just as Christ warned against, in Rev 1-3. Their silly 'councils' began
during Pius.
o For in 215-231, the army, not the Senate, calls the shots; apostates like Irenaeus,
Tertullian, Origen and their spawn, solidify Church apostasy by 'mothering' doctrines that
Bible refutes. Only women run
SPQR. The imperium, 100 years after Hadrian
ascended -- first eta in 1st
thelematos -- now
usurps and dwarfs the constitution and economy, of SPQR. So 'church fathers' also usurp Bible with
wild claims 'Church' is sole salvific institution + intercessory Mary (in
Latin: search on '776' and '277', respectively). Over time, more extra-Italy land once
governed by Senate, become imperial provinces, to save expense of running
them. Under the Severans,
Empire was mostly owned by the Imperator; the Senate had
little real power. The army became an
appendage of the imperium, which paid its wages. So in the name of defending Rome: power, administration and economic control
devolved onto whomever headed the imperium. Due to laziness and corruption, in the
Senate. Same with Bible: lazy Christians delegated its defense, to
priest-elites. So now bishops bypass
Bible, bury it. So too, Rome: army buries Senate.
o A third
tie, besides lying and 'mothering': standardizing law. Septimus, like Hadrian, was
keen on a bureaucracy of imperial laws, in the name of reform. The Adoptive Emperors
continued this; the Severans
claimed the mantle of Aurelius (i.e., as relatives of Commodus). So bureaucratizing continued under the
Severans and solidified. Romans
deemed the Severan epoch a wise period of law, hence
Paul's other sardonic verse 9 keyphrase, sophiai
kai phronesei for Septimus' rule. Under the Julia
sisters, such law distanced
the Senate from effective control. The
'bishops' did likewise, created an ecumenical
structure of many 'laws' not in Bible, mimicking the Pharisees who had done
the same thing, to Israel. Thus a
huge anti-Biblical system interposed itself between you and God.
o The
fourth tie: claim of top-down, divine authority. The early Romans overthrew this immemorial
claim, by people electing rulers.
Under the Severans, the 'gods' were now invoked to justify
usurping the constitution -- Senate was denuded, though cloaked by flattery, musterion again.
The Adoptive Emperors promoted 'true Roman' culture,
hence 'gods'. But the Severans
favored oriental 'gods', which during Heliogabalus,
provoked uproar. To flatter the Senate, Julia
Maesa thus made Alexander an appointee of Roman
gods, whom the boy revered (alongside Abraham and Christ). Thus she distanced the right of Imperator away
from the Senate. So too, Bible's
doctrine of the local church electing its 'bishop', was gradually
usurped by a top-down
claim of a regional 'see' electing local
'bishops', as if the 'see' were ALONE appointed by God.
Thus, Rev 17 popedoms were
born: at first, 5-10 rival, regional
'sees'. Then only Rome,
until the Great Schisms of 1054 and 1378.
Meter
Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, Appendix I,
continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 2nd eudokian, continued
o
So what does GOD mean
by these four historical ties in the second eudokian
benchmark? Why did He give Paul this
message? For we can surely see even
here, that Paul's word order is deliberate.
Again, Greek word order is flexible:
the same meanings can be communicated by the same words but in a
different order. So the order chosen,
obviously matches the Timing of His Story Yet-To-Happen; and is intended
to be, a prophetic WARNING.
o
The word ties are sophiai kai phronesei, musterion and thelematos. They stand for law, motherhood, succession,
with musterion being the keyword titling the
benchmark. Something-in-development
related to sonship, which has yet to give birth. So now we have to look at how bad Church is,
during this period.
o
To tell us about that, Paul introduces the Temple Trio, the third nested
anaphora we saw related textually, back in verse
11's note. First Temple
Trio was proetheto,
ending verse 9.
Means something put on public
display, originally a meal for a
guest -- i.e., for the god you wanted to honor. In verse 9, God put His Son on Display, as an
Offer for the world to 'eat' (believe).
So here we look at how Christ is put on display, by
Church, in Paul's satirical tracking of the time.
o
And when we look at that Time, we see an
ugly parallel picture on display. Just as ugly, as the portrait of the Severans.
· Succession
Lies made up to gain power. Here, lie of apostolic
succession, but it's the same kind of lie as the Julia
sisters tell. Oh, we had
incest with Caracalla, and these are his
sons. Oh, the apostles
ignored 1Cor15:1-10's requirement that to be called
'apostle', THE RESURRECTED CHRIST MUST PERSONALLY APPOINT YOU; so the apostles ignored CHRIST, instead
appointed us to replace them, as we are the New Israel. Says who?
THEY say it. Bible flatly
contradicts. But no one READS the
Bible. Each of these doctrinally-deficient, unfairly-lauded 'fathers' urge
slavish obedience to the 'bishop' -- which in successive redactions of their
writings, morphed into a universal 'catholic' church. (The writings never claim any ONE head of the Church, and of course no
popes were at Nicaea -- but rather many alleged heads, with Rome claiming
pre-eminence, but never sole eminence.
Everyone knows the writings are doctored; scholars have long tried to
separate out the doctored parts from whatever might actually belong to the
named writer. Just read the prefaces to Schaff's collection.)
· Politics
and money, claims of Divine support. The Julia sisters first
came to power by outbidding Didius Julianus. Now they gain power again, outbid Macrinus, then
play on the old Roman cult of domus. So what's the apostate Christian
counterpart? Invented 'bishop' lists,
based on a claim Church is New Israel.
Coupled with, appealing to
Caesar in letters. Rather than,
praying to God. In short, appealing to Caesar and progressively
PLAYING Caesar.
It's an
old gambit. First you pretend to be holy
and right and nice, writing out a grievance to someone POLITICAL. Key is, to make your appeal so
exaggerated and obnoxious, the political leader must reject your petition. Then you can claim the high ground of
martyrdom. Then you mass political
support among those who pity you or share your 'faith', so now you have funds
and bodies, to threaten the
state. Old game, played millions of
times, the Roman Emperors were all skilled in it. So were the Christian 'fathers', who could
but quote Bible, never once understood it! Christ said, the kingdom is NOT of this
world. These apostate 'fathers' all
try to MAKE the kingdom of this world, in their image. Theirs.
Not God's.
· Brother
killing brother. Just as Caracalla
murdered Geta and Julia sisters got Macrinus and Heliogabalus
killed, so too Christians persecute Christians with windy tomes, and 'laws' to
gain power. Like, when to celebrate
Easter! Wasn't Exodus 12 or John 19
in THEIR Bibles? See: they didn't know Word.
This is
the most telling. Their writings don't
help anyone grow spiritually in the Word. Instead, Bible to them is a political weapon
to kill opposition; their writings are petty, bitter apologetics, not
edifying. Yeah, everyone calls the
other a heretic, for no one calls on GOD. There is no exegesis or
other Bible analysis for its own sake. Rather, only argumentation. And shallow ideas of Bible. Mouthing it, absent any understanding. Blind guides.
Meter
Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, Appendix I,
continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st eudokian 1st
eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian
2nd eudokian God's Meaning 3rd eudokian 3rd
eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 2nd eudokian,
continued
Add
now, a virulent anti-semitism. Search on 'Jew' in their writings. Ireneaus, Tertullian and Origen also
lie about Peter
and John (search link on 'Rome' thrice, then
'boiling oil'). They malign James (yeah, he's gonna
break the Mosaic law, live inside Temple, enter Holy of Holies UNWASHED). Before
them, jerks Ignatius,
Polycarp, Justin Martyr. Same anti-semitism, self-praise,
effusiveness. More follows in 'Hall of Shame', below. Point is, they warred over caesarship,
too. The religious kind.
·
Regulation after regulation. Severus' reign
resulted in multiplying bureaucracy. So
the 'fathers' claimed an ecumenical structure like the Jews had: added
many rituals
and hierarchy and
councils (on few issues during Commodus, but as regulations, in 3rd century) -- to GAIN POWER against
rivals.
o
In short, Civil War Went On
In Christendom, So Civil War Went On In Rome, which
God designed to house and protect, Christendom.
Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28,
playing live -- negatively -- just as God always promised. That was their
own mouldy 'meal' of 'Christ' proetheto'd: on
display, to the world.
o
Hence verse 9's proetheto is
sarcastic, metered at seven syllables = years 231-238: apostasy so bad, the World Should End. Yeah, and God even used the apostate New
Prophecy movement in Rome and Alexandria back then, to warn of the surgical persecutions to ensue. Rapture/Trib conditions happen when Church
is too apostate. So God cleans House,
Lev26, Deut28, 1Kings9. John
presented that theme in Rev 1-3; hence Rev 4:1 is the Rapture,
bracketed by two meta tauta clauses (open and close, walling off
Church Age from Trib). Ironic, as Origen
allegorized away the Millennium, and
his view would replace it. Echoed
by, the new, fake Peter-first-in-Rome-during-CLAUDIUS (!) bishop lists, created by Origen's rival
Demetrius, using Julius Africanus; which a second Hippolytus, aped.
Hippy and Origen got close to the Severan mothers;
Hippy/Pontianus get exiled/martyred, 231-232.
Severus Alexander is executed by usurping
general Max Thrax, who next is murdered by hungry soldiers
in 238, favoring yet another teenage puppet. And so it goes, musical purple chairs until Diocletian.
o
Thus ends the 2nd eudokian
anaphora bookend at 231 and the Temple
Trio's first bookend of proetheto, at 238: civil war over sonship, succession. Word's History sets World's History. Word's History: We Used Bible to Levy Tyranny. So world
history is bad, "Crisis of the Third Century". Roman imperium had no constitutional
basis. Liars claimed apostolic
succession sans Biblical basis.
They vied for power based on acclamation. Might
makes right, when God's Out Of
Sight.
But God lives. That's why He had Paul use musterion as the
title for this second bookend. Something
hidden to be birthed.
As a result of all this civil war, the Roman empire effectively
breaks up into spheres of power, so the few Christians who are
learning and living on Bible, can vote with their feet. Maybe they vote to work in a monastery, to get
a copy of Bible, or at least hear it.
Maybe they go East, outside of Roman influence. Maybe they go north, or deeper into
Africa. They needn't travel so far
to safety, if the Empire is broken up.
So, it is. That's the purpose of any disaster, diaspora exodus to safer places. Where you can study in relative peace. The center is rotted, so now the outer
parts break off. Thus Bible --
and its study -- will be preserved.
Thus God creates Autonomy to preserve
Bible. We're still in the first
epainon anaphora, as well as
in the second eudokian. Showing, that the
'praise of the Glory of His Grace' is being met -- despite Church. For pharisaical religiosity of the 'church
fathers' and their ilk becomes progressively obvious; people start quietly voting with their
feet. It became hard to get a Bible, as
the factions hoarded them: using Bible like bait. So you became a monk; or, if you could get a Bible, maybe you began
a small outpost of your own, like David going to Adullam. You kept quiet about having a Bible,
lest someone assert authority over you, to get it. Of course Satan isn't idle; someone catches
you, sooner or later. So you became
nomadic, a trader who kept moving. In
short, one could stay independent, so long as the state wasn't
'christian'. But it soon WOULD
be, so God here fragments its
future. By little groups,
enclaves, even villages. They were goofy
in doctrine, too. But they weren't
political. Takes time to mature in
Word; and they were studying it. Just because.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian,
continued
o So we
see how He preserved Word in the
third eudokian bookend, which runs from
syllables = years 308-320. This is the time of Constantine's
rise. This final eudokian
bookend is titled energountos, God as the
Actor -- not Constantine. For Constantine hallucinates HIMSELF working
everything together! Title for energountos, was prothesin: Temple
Shewbread, 2nd of the Temple Trio. It sets up Constantine, via Diocletian's
own 'shewbread plan'. For God
Equates Constantine With Diocletian. That bad.
Same benchmarking Daniel used, in Daniel 9: specifically, his two 58's in Daniel 9:11-12,
the cause for the 1st Temple's destruction, as the Temple Trio link, showed:
o
Verse 10's
textual theme sets up Diocletian: God brings all
Time together in Church.
Historically, it's the 235-284 Crisis
of the Third Century, aftermath of Severus Alexander. We saw in the Chrono Chart, how each clause
in verse 10, covered that time. Due to
Church voting badly (70 syllables, 231-301), the Crisis occurred.
o
Diocletian's
rise, began at the end of the last clause in verse 10, aptly titling
his rise as 'all matters on earth'. That's
what Diocles thought he was, The Uniter. As soon as he killed a boar. Which he did, in July or November,
284. He personally dated his
succession from December 283, when Carus
died. Not knowing, July was Jewish
priestly course of the Boar, Hezir (third week July or
January). So verse 10 ends the
year of Carus' death, too. For
Diocletian is the Ruler of the Earth, get it?
o
Verse 11 thus
begins with Diocletian himself, in 284. It's a cynical election clause: Diocletian's
view of himself, and his Empire plan.
o
Verse 11's second
clause is a bitingly ironic phrase, prooristhentes
kata prothesin. Literally, foreordained as per
Temple Shewbread, the last two words blanded out as 'plan', in all Bible
translations. Masks its Jewishness. Yeah, it was the plan of MAKING THE BREAD
that Presented Christ as the Bread of Life, the Food Offering to God. Presentation At Court. Apostate
Christians were then busy erasing Israel, too, claiming to replace her;
ignoring, Ephesians 2. For they had
their own plan, rather than God's.
o
Keys off 70 syllables=years earlier, proetheto in verse 9: as God
Set Christ before us, so too we who believe are made LIKE Him, an offering
Presented to God.
o
The prothesin sarcasm is plain: Diocletian turned
Imperator into a presentation, an
ostentatious office; you must
present yourself prostrate as if to God;
for he claimed to be the direct agent forJupiter. Divesting rulership from the Senate, in the
name of Roman unity!
o And why not? The 'church' set itself up as THE go-between: you were only saved, if the 'church' said so.
Tyrannical Monopoly. In the name of
unity!
o
At this point, it's 301. So what does Diocletian
do? Control bread and other prices! The 'bishops' did the same Revelation 13
thing! You had to have their 'mark' of
approval, or you were persecuted. So of
course, third clause in verse 11 is seven syllables, GOD Works All The Shewbread. So let's see that, next.
o This 308-320 period was covered in detail within the
Chrono Chart. So here we focus on
Paul's biting wordplay, almost syllable by syllable. Its setup begins
in 301-308. A seven-syllable clause denoting Trib-quality
time, Christians maximally apostate...
o tou
ta panta energountos is the whole phrase for 301-308. To remind you that GOD is
working everything together for good, Romans 8:28. So
o tou
ta covers Diocletian's attempt to control the economy, in 301 (the
pricing edicts and other changes). Which backfires. This attempt should remind Christians
of Revelation 13. For Diocletian will
attempt to do the whole tou ta panta energountos phrase, as if he
himself were the agent of God. Just like
Kristallnacht would later be, Diocletian's
pricing edicts constitute an opening salvo of tyranny; the next 19 syllables will each warn
Christians to LEAVE. 19 years of
warning.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian,
continued
o pan covers
the Diocletian persecution in 303, which
had its reprieves; it wasn't evenly enforced, especially in the West; so you had opportunities to flee. Yeah, Diocletian goes
after pan, everyone; Galerius and
later Daza add their own edicts to Diocletian's two. So God uses
the delays to make pan
opportunities for people to vote with their feet. For God knows what's going to happen, next. This is like the second half of the
Trib; the real future Trib has a
mid-point with an exit window (see my TribChrono.pdf), so this
reminds the reader of it.
o panta covers Diocletian's
illness, 304, just after he'd celebrated
his 20th anniversary (remember, he dated his own accession back to Carus' death). Similar to Nebuchadnezzar, the man is
obviously humbled. So all he worked so
hard to accomplish, availed him nothing.
His illness creates succession in-fighting; and thus provides
Christians, with another exit window.
See, God really does accomplish all.
All to save the Word from
what He foreknows, will happen to it.
o energountos covers
305-308; spans Diocletian's
retirement and the ensuing working-together foibles, of the Tetrarchy (shifting alliances, Maxentius'
usurpation at Rome, father Max resuming the purple, Constantius' death
and son Constantine's marriage to Max's
daughter Fausta, defeat of Severus, Galerius'
ignominious retreat from Italy); culminating in the meeting at Carnuntum: where
a not-yet-broken Diocletian, refuses to budge. Canny way to make everyone get along. Working something together by doing
nothing. Finally, he gets the
idea. His partners didn't, though. Still, by his refusing to take sides, the
resulting fragmentation means the persecution he launched, becomes a political
football: with the result that Christians get a reprieve. Exit window, again. For believers who have Word. Thus God preserved His Word. Thus the 7-year period ends, so now it's time
to regroup.
o kata covers
the period from 309 to 310, the
machinations of Maximinius and his son Maxentius. At the end, the father dies. At the beginning, he ran from Constantine to Diocletian
(Carnuntum) -- and now, back to Constantine again
-- all to either gain support for Maxentius -- or,
to get support for killing his own son. Nice
guy. So kata Maximinius, he
should return to power. But kata GOD, he
should die, qatal; for if he does, the
ensuing succession squabbles open yet another exit window. So he dies of his own devising, having tried
at Arles and then maybe in Constantine's own house, to kill Constantine. Meanwhile, Galerius gets a
genital illness and takes a whole year to die, after trying in vain to oust Maxentius from
Rome. His persecute-Christian edicts are
still active, but since he's sick, people don't enforce them much.
o ten
boulen covers 311 to 313. Now, a Eusebius or Lactantius might
wax loquacious and vicious, exaggerating or inventing 'the truth' -- to gloat
here over Max, Galerius, and Daza's deaths. As if God vindicated Constantine. Those (ahem) 'fathers' couldn't read Bible;
for here Paul proves the opposite meaning.
Consider:
· ten = 311, Galerius dies (see Appendix II); that triggers an alliance between Licinius and Constantine;
Daza
reacts, creates his own alliance with Licinius and Maxentius. Now, Galerius dies
after he issues his own (30 April 311) tolerance-of-Christianity
proclamation. He's really the second
guy to do it. Not Constantine and
Licinius. The first
guy to proclaim toleration, was Maxentius, just
after he usurped the purple in Rome (October 306). Constantine, not
to be outdone, grants amnesty (hence legal right to be a Christian), and
return of property to his own realms. Maxentius had
only granted legal right. So you see,
all this pro-Christian stuff reflected the popularity
of Christianity, turned into politics -- going on, ever since the Severans.
· bou = 312. The 'bou' prefix in Attic signifies something
huge and monstrous. Cute. Bou-ghee man gonna get you.
· So the
enemy of Rome dies that day, equus lapsu from Milvian Boat
Bridge-Out, Maxentius; Constantine takes
over Rome, via faked in hoc signo -- faked, as God NEVER does that
stuff. Canon is closed. Only a crass liar like Eusebius or Lactantius, makes God do pet tricks. He didn't even do that for CHRIST!
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian,
continued
· Faked,
as first Maxentius and then Galerius issued
their tolerance edicts; so now Constantine must
compete! Maxentius
reneged on his 306 protection for Rome, and
didn't apply it in the provinces. Barnes
says Constantine issued an informal version of the tolerance edict, in late
312.
·
Faked, as Constantine played the same in hoc bimbo
game using PAGAN gods, vision
of Apollo offering him 120 years victory! -- back in 310.
· So
hey: just change the
WHO and the sign, in 312. Sucker born every minute.
· Yeah,
120 years as in Genesis 6, as in 4-generation curse, indeed
the Empire's future! Paul stops at 434. Demons know Paul's meter. But who got the joke?
· For Constantine's
sons DESTROY all male heirs, and themselves die by 361,
absent sons; Constantine's daughters and one granddaughter are
barren, the whole line dying out by
383. End progeny. (Also
search on 'stemma', here.) [Apollo vision is demonic,
dual-entendre like Sibylline
Oracles: like the Halys River and
Maxentius-consultation quotes. Demons
use truth to mock the recipient and witness to
Bible. Koran or Book of Mormon,
employ similar burlesque. So too, UFO
and ghost 'encounters'. ]
· Oh, and
Satan's pre-fall name is Apollo, aka MorningStar. Christ is THE Morning Star, get the pun? 'Apollo' is derived from apolumi,
Destroy. Same demon guy who
bugged John Keel in Mothman Prophecies, with backwards Latin. (Re backwards Latin, search on
'Lanulos' in http://www.brainout.net/SatTacExamp.htm#Mothman.)
· So read
this as in hoc hoaxo, a political gambit for who gets Christian support,
Constantine or Licinius. The
alliance between the two was after Galerius died.
· If you
were a real Bible-learning Christian, you'd take this as your cue to FLEE Roman
rule. Paul warns of it, 250+
years in advance. Christians who got Ephesians
would know the timeline. The few who
really studied Bible, passed that knowledge down to their kids. They will be musterion, hidden.
· boulen = 313. Nuptials and Edict
of Milan. Again, this is a tool
to win Christian support. Daza issues
his own version, April 30, 2nd anniversary of Gallerius' own
(sarcastic) Toleration Edict, the day he goes to fight Licinius. Again, to win Christian support. So their boulen is to
gain political power. God's boulen is to
free Christians from apostate mellein-esesthei, Catholic church. For God knows what will happen after the dust
settles and Constantine wins.
· So
witness Paul's Inspired boulen
sarcasm: you apostate Christians and
the Tetrarchy WANT Tyranny in My Name, just
as Diocletian decreed. But for 'your'
side. But God WANTS Freedom, and I'll
get it. For the Edict opened
up another exit window, like Purim, for the Christians to get OUT. They should have been alerted to what's
coming, since there was obvious competition to curry Christian favor. God condemned Revelation 17 politicking.
o
tou thelematos autou covers
314 to 320.
The e is year 316, when Diocletian
dies. Appendix
II goes through that timeline, since
scholars are now in two 'camps': a) those holding to the (correct) 316 date,
and b) those who lately think Diocletian died
in 311 (or by 313). Paul
uses 316, shows the deceased's intent, failed:
· Trajan's
'son' Hadrian, was first e in the first
eudokian anaphora;
he reversed his Adopted 'father's' policies, thus saving the Empire. Dio and
the Senate felt that Hadrian won Empire by
trickery, a faked WILL by Plotina, Trajan's wife. Stress on Sonship, to keep SPQR intact. So
demands a WILL of Adopted Emperors.
· The
second e was Heliogabalus, in
the 2nd eudokian anaphora; his female regents were both
responsible for setting him up by trickery, putting him down, and
holding the Empire together the meanwhile through the 2nd Adopted son: Severus
Alexander reversed everything. Et après lui, le deluge: no heirs.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian,
continued
· Same,
for third e
here in the 3rd eudokian anaphora:
when Diocletian dies, the Adoptees undo all Diocletian hoped
to achieve. Just as Diocletian, everyone
uses trickery in the name of Empire, and everyone wants to kill the
other guy.
· Diocletian used
trickery to justify murdering Aper. To recast the role of Emperor, and sideline
the Senate.
· Constantine used
trickery, to win against Maxentius. And then, to control Church (or so
he thought.)
· Church used
trickery, to control politics and then Constantine.
· They
all used the trickery of marriage and treaties, laws. So, they all die.
· But
they continue the dangerous Diocletian LEGACY
of church united to state control, bureaucracy, and divided empire. [Which briefly unites again
under the Adopted but unrelated Theodosius, who
then by WILL divides the Empire between his two sons: who are children
then. Just like the Severan kids
were. So the regents use trickery
on the kids, for they WILL to war with each other. And, to be fair, they did preserve Rome as
much as they undermined it. So, even Theodosius' lines
die out by the fourth generation.]
o
matos autou covers
317 to 320.
Clever. THEY will: but the
object (ma) of their will,
fails. Yet God's Object (ma
converts verb to noun), is achieved.
o
So what did God's thelema, Adoptive
Will achieve? Autonomy for Bible via
Diaspora. For now CHURCH persecutes, so everyone
must go into Diaspora
again, taking Word with them. For Church nearly destroys Bible. Paul links
this eudokian 3rd stop, with the epainon 2nd stop,
at syllables = years 320-334. The summed epainon meter overlaps here, just as 2nd eudokian
had overlapped, to stress the overlap's weight:
1st-to-2nd benchmark was 133-334, but
2nd-to-3rd is 320-434.
Why? The doctrinally-retarded Council of Nicaea is the supreme proof of Church apostasy: Rev 17,
baby. It Institutionalized
Persecution; millions would die,
as a result. It's positively criminal
that no 'fathers' bother to LEARN Bible; instead, they rely on their own
hearsay, 2Cor10:12. So let's trace why God
equates Constantine with Diocletian, why God Blasts The 'Church Fathers', here in the 2nd epainon. To skip this long subsection, click here.
GIST:
Church is completely apostate. It is not His Glory. It lives for political power and human
approbation. Its hypocrisy, lies and trickery, exude from Church
Father writings, linked below. Our
Naked Hall of Shame. Stains, not Saints. Yet as in the Emperor's
New Clothes, they cheep flowery words -- so we carnal, undiscerning,
Bible-ignorant Christians, bedeck them 'fathers'. Our 'hall' goes from 1st-century through year
320, where the 2nd epainon
anaphora begins.
o
First up, the bilious Clement
of Rome (30-100) with his Scripture diarrhea
(used to gain
power) and outright
lies against Christ, betraying his
power grab for apostleship,
contravening 1 Corinthians 15:1-10 -- and even claims phoenixes real, to depict the
Lord's Resurrection! What an
insult against Christ.
o
Next, 'Barnabas' (d.100), whose
usurper, anti-semitic XIII has Church inherit but Israel, removed. So all those OT heroes, get squat? Ever-popular lie.
o
Next, oh-how-holy-I-am
Ignatius (30-107), spews letters
during a six month cruise to Rome, to preen as a martyr. (Norm
is 20 days' by sea, tops; 60
days, by land.)
o
Next, arch anti-semite 'mathetes' (d. 130). Yeah, student of hating
the Jews. Bible, he but mouths; he clearly never grasped the Mosaic Law.
o
Next, ol' Polycarp
(65-155). Pick: the goofy
account of his
'martyrdom' -- God doing pet tricks to praise an old man who misread
Bible? Or, the man's own writings? For Polycarp like Clement, is full of Scripture
diarrhea. Just strings verses
together, no grasp of them.
Body-oriented. Mistakes outers as
inners, praises fasting and chastity as spiritual. Mosaic Law re fasting was a CONVENIENCE of
omitting food, to study Bible without distraction. Not to preen. King David wasn't chaste. So then spirituality must be something
higher, yes? Polycarp never
learned the Scripture he obviously memorized.
Instead, his 'bible' came from his fellow apostates.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian
Hall of Shame, continued
o
Next, Papias (70-155) enjoyed lying about John, Mary, Judas and heaven -- which
Bible contradicts, of course. So Papias
couldn't read Revelation himself to know it was valid, but goes by what
other apostates say. HEARSAY evidence is not admissable! But oh, carnality
ONLY accepts hearsay. Spirituality justifies based on WORD. But the carnal, seek the world. So they value hearsay, rather
than Word. To reject the Jews, of course
(see that 'hearsay' link).
o
Next, anti-semite Justin Martyr
(110-165), writing venom to malign Jews, via 'frailty'=Trypho. To spew his anti--God,
anti-semitism
(Church replaces Israel!), Justin butchers The Old Jewish Testament. So full of bombast and going-to-Caesar,
not God. His silly 'martyrdom' account
befits his goofy writing.
o
Aped by, Hegesippus
(110-180). A Hebrew? Given what he
says about James, he wouldn't know Mosaic Law if it bit him. He used Clement and Justin's
mangled Bible notions, to first craft a 'bishop list' from James' jewishness: for oh, church=new
Israel? James isn't
from Levi; did they never read OT, Eph 2, Hebrews 10? Jerome repeats that lie, so he
never learned Bible, either. (Search on 'James' in that
link.) Hey: you can translate, without ever learning what you translate.
o Ireneaus
(120-202) loves
lies, too. Calls his apostasy,
universal apostleship. Then proves
he lies, as he
writes against other Christians.
Word is a gun to fire. So, he
never learned it; he doesn't grasp
Trinity nor that
the SON created. But sounds
good. Until you THINK OVER what he says.
o
So too, these 2nd-century goofballs: prurient Hermas
(d.160); bombastic,
ascetic Tatian (110-172); self-praising, Bible-embellishing
'Theophilus' (168-181); Athenagoras
(d.177) who
pleads-to-Caesar but not God; the weird, legalistic Clement
of Alexandria (153-193-217) -- who never read Matt.
15:11, 18; Mk. 7:20.
o
Let's not forget the emotional, hopelessly shallow Tertullian (145-220).
He blithely invents or twists Bible, belittles Paul to
advance Peter, castrates Word to invent 'Church'
as ONE institution of fictitious unity. Holy Spirit is effete, but Tertullian's TRADITION is infallible --
to justify power
grab by Rome. Gaily claims John escaped boiling oil, yet when elderly fled
a bathhouse, to avoid a bathing heretic! All bundled with his lie of Apostolic
Succession! So he claims slapstick,
'Book of Enoch'
is genuine. In that same link, spews the
tired anti-semitic lie that Hebrew Bible started with Ezra. Which lie Will
Durant and the video series EMPIRES,
repeats. Yeah, Ezra made up the
Psalms and the first five books of the Bible, not Moses and David. Isaiah is a fake, Daniel too.. What, can
no one tell the Hebrew is 1400 bc,
in the Pentateuch? Moses didn't talk
like Isaiah or Daniel or Ezra, and the place names CHANGED over the centuries..
o
Not to be outdone, is Minucius Felix (d. 210). Prolix, is more like it. But entertaining. Followed by, a very anti-semitic Commodianus (d.240).
o
Next, our boy Origen (185-230-254). Nice mixed-up
guy, who can't grasp
PLAIN BIBLE on Lot, Abraham, begats and histories. They're all 'mysteries' and 'dark sayings'.
So he allegorizes
Scripture out of context, tangles himself
up in knots. But he worked hard and
well on preserving Bible. Pity he
never understood it.
o Sigh. Next
guy, is an influential gossip who maybe invented the 4th 'bishop list'
Eusebius uses; yet like E., can't count Bible begats: Hippolytus (170-236). Disciple of Irenaeus. Hippy loves lying about Peter, John; oh, and Matthew was originally in Hebrew?! Oh, and he claims Earth is 5500 years old
when Christ came! E. said 5199, not much better. Golly, and we LAUD these dingdongs? (Bible says Christ died in year 4136
from Adam's FALL, not 'creation'.
Some scholars posit TWO Hippolytuses, see
Chapter 8 of Bishops Lists, by Robert Lee Williams.)
o
Next idiot, doctrinally justifies persecuting Jews by twisting Word, naturlich. Who? Arch anti-semite Cyprian (200-251), another martyr
spawn of mendacious Tertullian. Sheer bombast. Legalistic to the core. Can't discern, Lord's Prayer is
a Beginner's Guide?! real
spiritual prayer, is John 17. But he never learned it.
o
Next, Caius (180-217). Read his whopper -- oh, John asked the
disciples to fast for three days, before he AGREED to write his Gospel. Yeah, mixing up Esther's 3-day request,
before she petitioned Ahasuerus. Mixing
up Acts1:23-26, dictate-to-God election of Matthias, who God rejected (replaced
with James, see 1Cor15:1-10).
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian Hall of
Shame, continued
o
Next Roman anti-semite, Novatian (210-280). But at least he's well-organized. Yet can't explain Trinity. Instead, he just rails, bluffs
and then sidesteps
the question. Legalistic. Can't read 1Cor10:25-28, as Novatian had a weak
conscience. So he was carnal, a
spiritual newborn: like his name.
o
Next dingdong is Gregory Thaumaturgus
(205-240-265). Another Scripture-diarrhea
adept; sad thing is, he was supposed to
be a law
student. He thought Origen, who
took the eunuch verse in Bible too literally and then allegorized it all away
-- Greg baby though Ori was a spiritual giant. Yikes.
Which is sillier: the guy's own
ignorance of 1Cor10:25-28, or the (yellow)
modern commentary? Look here
and decide. The rest of what he writes, is worse. End Gregory.
o
Next spawn of Origen is
merrily called Dionysius the Great
(200-265). See how petty. Same as Pharisees. Motions absent meaning. Note how the most Important Day of the
Year is trivialized into WHAT HOUR one should stop fasting. Incredible: what CHRIST did is bypassed,
2Tim3:5 playing live. End Dionysius. Let's avoid him.
o
Next, Comrade Julius
Africanus (200-245). Like Hippolytus, this guy can't calculate years from Adam, nor calc Daniel. Oh, and he FIRST invented a 'bishop list'
claiming Peter 'bishop' at ROME pre-Paul -- when Claudius had BANNED
Christians from Rome?! Can't read
Nehemiah, either. Duh: 52 days aren't
enough to rebuild Jerusalem. Dan
9:24ff is GOD's decree, no human king's.
But hey: BIBLE's nothing, compared to 'church father' hearsay! So our eschatology remains screwed up.
o
Miscellaneous Dingbats. Here we have late 200's gems, like convoluted and
INCORRECT calculation of Easter (ignoring Exodus 12 and John
19, of course); obtuse
description of Hypostatic
Union (what, didn't they have Philippians 2 or Hebrews 1?); abuse of Paul's
being a virgin (so they can't read 1Cor7) -- as usual, ASSuming
abstinence is ipse spiritual, like any pagan would. But one breath of fresh
air just before Diocletian's persecution. Sigh: enter 270,
church power-mad
tyranny; and even in 307 -- in Upper Egypt, so under Galerius' or Daza's persecution edicts --
still power
grab, too. Sicker, but fun to read,
is this overpraise
of virgins. Didn't anyone
realize, PAGANs praise virginity?
Bible praises thinking, not
abstinence, Eph1:18! God using Paul,
praises Mary's thinking by aping
her meter, see my Magnificat
videos.
o
Lactantius, (260-330). Diocletian and Constantine's
time, but his writing stops at 313. Sycophant. Gloater. Loves to lie to sell
something. Makes up any old story
or exaggerates
with venom, with zero concern
that he lies
before God. And they're not even clever
lies. Tell me: if you rejected the purple TWICE, pleading
retirement, would you starve yourself if your statue were taken down -- since
it was ATTACHED to your enemy's? No:
if anything you'd celebrate the disassociation!
So are you surprised Lactantius lies about
Constantine's conversion? Oh, Licinius receives
dictation from an ANGEL! Magic inability
to fight! [Lest
you say, 'oh, he's just a product of his times, everyone lied like that' --
oh? I thought living for Christ was
supposed to make you LIKE CHRIST -- not, like the times. This guy is just another apostate church liar. Just like his times, but not like God's Word.
Contradicting
himself. It's hard to believe that
the guy who wrote that last link is the same Lactantius. So maybe the lurid stuff is written by
someone else. Slap on a famous name,
like the junk written in the name of Adam, Seth, Enoch, Abraham, Patriarchs,
Peter, etc. Mad Magazine stuff.]
o
Next: Victorinus, died circa 304. His 'exposition' on Revelation
utterly proves him a Bible-ineptizoid (search on 'paps', then start
reading). Note how he
twists everything, including Rev 7, just like Origen – to mean CHURCH. What, no TWELVE
TRIBES? Religious carnality, at its
worst. When
you cut the Jews who are CHRIST'S INHERITANCE (hence Millennium) out of
history, God cuts YOU out from history. No wonder God allowed Diocletian's
edicts!
o
Eusebius
(260-340) is the last liar on this list, and worst. He just flat IMBIBES all the garbage above,
never mind the Bible contradicts, and assembles it into his goofball Ecclesiastical
History, with a fabricated 'bishop list' RCC has
been crowing over, ever since. Yeah, history of jerks! Just read his biography on Constantine. Then vomit. He droolingly exaggerates
to sell his cockamamie notions. God just
doesn't mean anything, to him. People who can't READ the truth, admire
liars like Eusebius. All they hear are
the fancy words and pious tones, soft-shoe-buck-and-wing -- and they are
dazzled. No Spirit in them. By the millions, even until today.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian
Hall of Shame, continued
o
Upshot: Full of their own
self-importance, 'Church fathers' use Scripture as a dirty-laundry list, tsav
l'tsav, rarely any exegesis or Bible teaching for its own sake. Zero perception: to these folk, Bible is a
gun you fire at your opponent, expecting him to admire your spewing so much. Usurpers in God's Name, they stain the idea
of God, churlishly sell childish ritual, relics = DEAD BODY PARTS, gossip,
goofy miracle tales; merely thumping
Bible, never teaching it. Elitism. All today's
false teaching comes from these 'fathers'; to whom, effusiveness, virginity and
pious behavior was everything.
Pharisees. It's criminal,
that we heed them.
o
But inside that apostate Church were monks in
monasteries, quietly learning and going to the countrysides, teaching. They don't seek political power. They seek solitude and teach Bible in small
groups, invisible. They copy Bibles, and
then those Bibles are distributed. Granted,
they rarely copy Greek text, compared to Latin translations; so Latin is all
the West knows. Greek texts in the East
are also sequestered with priest elites;
so the common man gets but Bible snippets and even more ritual, goofy
miracle tales. The Hebrew is shunned, as
anti-semitism is strong: oh, any
JEWISH text must be evil. So no Bible,
accurately learned. Unless you went
where Jews were hiding.
o
So a spiritual Christian FLEES both
sides or hides within. Or,
like Jerome, heads to the hinterlands, to get that JEWISH text. And
unlike Jerome, really learns it.
o
So now consider the 2nd
epainon, from 320-334: EXODUS. To Protect Bible. For that's what God means by
'to the end that we BECOME the good report (aka 'praise', in
English Bibles) of His Glory.' We just saw, from the many writings by
'Church Fathers', that Church was anything but a 'good report'; not at all
praise for HIS Glory, but rather for its own.
So the epainon is sarcasm, with respect to them. It's realized positively in a different way,
parallel to the first time the epainon was
used.
o
Review:
the 1st epainon, years 122-133,
birthed an exodus when
Jerusalem was razed. Note the epainon began beforehand, a kind of Pregnancy Warning. The discerning, would leave during this
time. The warning? Politicizing Jewish apostasy, culminating in the fake-Messiah, Bar
Kochba rebellion. They had wanted Jesus to be a political
Messiah, not a spiritual one; He
refused, but later pretenders did not.
Hadrian was plagued by their riots during his
reign; so he razes Jerusalem, builds a
PAGAN city with a PIG temple over the Holy of Holies; then, barred Jews from entering the
city. Hint Hint.
o
This 2nd epainon is
parallel: due to Christian apostasy, in 320+
there's another EXODUS
warning, to Leave Rome! It peaks in 324 with
the construction of 'New
Rome' – remember, Revelation 17 came out in AD 96 -- parallel of a new
apostate city built on a razed one. Construction begins 490 years after Antiochus IV Epiphanes desecrated the 2nd
Temple, then ruled
there. Could
God make a more biting analogy? Could He
more deftly express His censure of Constantine?
o
Watch this: in Greek, the epainon clause
reads eis
to einai hemas eis epainon doxzes autou. So years 321-324 are
covered by eis to einai. Translated, 'In order to become' (literally,
'be'). Heh: the squabbling
'fathers' kept becoming an Imperial nuisance;
but not until 323, did
Constantine and Licinius fight again.
o
In the 'nai' of 'einai' -- 324 -- Constantine had
beaten Licinius, had sole control of the Empire, and
recovered enough to start building Constantinople. Grandiose
thing. Byzantium was
razed, many Jews
moved in during that time. Bringing
Hebrew Bible, with them. So now
you didn't have to travel so far, to get it.
During this window, Jews weren't so persecuted. Again, people were tired of fighting. Well, not for long: by
388, Jews would again be persecuted.
So what
happens? Rome's sidelined. When a polity
moves, many go along; others stay behind; or, move away. So it's an Exodus for everyone. At this point, it was clear how Church
factioned, who 'won'; divisions were vicious.
So you could slip quietly away and
thus study better, if God mattered to you.
Less need to 'explain'. Same
result with less violence, as obtained for the Bar
Kochba period.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon
Appendix
II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian,
continued
o
So now we go through the rest of the
phrase: hemas eis epainon doxzes autou. This period covers 325-334,
beginning with Licinius' death, and ending with Constantinople's
dedication
in 330 or 334 -- see footnote in that Gibbon link; he seems to side with 330. [I can't
find ANYONE who believes 334 is valid.
Let me know if you do.]
o So if 330, then
'doxzes autou' is left out. Biting, huh. The truncated phrase is 'eis
to einai hemas eis epainon', to the end WE result in praise. Ouch. Not of HIS Glory, but our own. Yeah, that's what Constantine
wanted. Neropolis, Commodiana,
Philipopolis, Cain naming the city he built after his son. Get the point?
o
What about 334? [Enjoy a Clementine phoenix
chuckle, here
(left middle).] Constantine then
negated Nicaea, revived Arianism. Conflicting details: here,
here
and here. His attempt to unify Church abetted
religious war, for another 1000 years.
The world only stopped fighting, due to exhaustion. God's Message: don't meddle with God's stuff. God handles it; not Church, not Caesar. For God Alone generates spiritual growth; He
doesn't use human effort, Rom 4:2, 9:16, Eph2:8-9, Eph3:15-19.
o
God had Paul give that message in advance: 3rd of Temple
Trio, proelpikotas. THE FEW. FIRST FRUITS FEW. 42
syllables = years between prothesin at 301, and
the end of verse
12, here. 42 is a
Bible metaphor of generation building,
as you hopefully saw in Pregnancy2 Palindromes. Of course that's sarcasm, too: for what
generations do Church and Constantine build? Not good ones. Ergo, this 42-syllable anaphora parallel, links
back to Diocletian's edict.
Ergo, the anaphorae
are causal: eudokian = Autonomy; it births epainon = Bible Preservation, Learning (Heb 11:6); it
births 'fruit' of Spiritual Growth like WORD = CHRIST, Eph 3:15-19, 4:12-13.
Hence Temple Trio:
set before (like a meal for a guest, comes to mean 'public display') = proetheto
results in Temple
Shewbread = prothesin
results in FirstFruits = proelpikotas
Ironic parallel, Diocletian and Constantine:
o
what Diocletian set
before men to 'eat' = persecution, governmental tyranny.
o
Constantine's
'shewbread' = Diocletian's,
renamed 'Christian', a holy fascism; his kids will murder each other and thousands
more, using it.
o
So the new 'catholic
church' is the first-fruits harvest of
institutionalized evil. Revelation 17,
anyone? Right down to the clothing colors?
o Syllables matching 335 - 343, tous
proelpikotas en toi Christoi, are appositional to hemas. Explaining the epainon. And it's not the city, get it? But instead, the FirstFruits
Few. Technically, pro+elpikotas
means 'the first-hoping', literally, the first 'crop' who believes in
Christ. The early crop. That's what Firstfruits was: you had handfulls
of an early crop to wave before God in the Temple. Something that matured FIRST. And it was small. Waved toward God to acknowledge Him as LORD
of the Harvest. For He does the Work. That He provides. Courtesy of Christ Our Firstfruits, 1Cor15:23. (See also Rom. 8:23; 11:16;
1 Co. 15:20; 16:15; Jas. 1:18; Rev. 14:4.)
· As a
result, the rest of the harvest followed later, on Pentecost -- in the OT
ritual, 50 days. The time always stood
for the last 50 years (before the Trib), for Harvesting The Gentiles. Jubilee.
And now with Church, 'later' is
as long as it takes, John 17:14-26.
· We know
that's the meaning, as we saw the second of the Temple
Trio, prothesin, nested just after the 2nd eudokian anaphora,
well after the first epainon
anaphora. It stood for Firstfruits, also:
Temple Shewbread was baked
from the first fruits. First of the Temple Trio was Christ Himself, proetheto'd. Bread of Heaven, John 6:32. Bread of Life, John 6:33, 35-58. As a result, we are to become a copy of Him, 1Cor2:16,
1Pet2:21. That makes us, prothesin.
·
And how much was that Shewbread offering? Small.
A few loaves. Presented. Waved.
Buying time for the rest of the harvest. At Pentecost.
Jubilee.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian,
continued
· But
what was 'Church' waving before God? Waiver of learning and teaching Bible. Wavering political games. Waiver of tolerance, in the name of unity. Waving in the pews, waving in rituals,
waiving study in favor of gossip and fake miracles, pilgrimages, relics = DEAD
BODY PARTS, 'holy' songs and unctuous tones, fooling the masses. In short, Bread
and Circus. Even, until now.
· So what
Time did 'Church' buy? What
harvest? Time: DARK AGES. A firstfruits of bloodshed, a crop of
religious retards, spiritually blighted.
For 2000 years, even until now.
Paul will stop his meter at 120 syllables = years after Constantine
began institutionalizing 'church' in government: after all, that's what 'Apollo' said! (434-120=314,
when Constantine first started messing in Church politics). For
the apostasy pattern is established by and doesn't change, after Constantine. Even
until now. Look how people still slobber
about that awful time, drooling over the power,
baby. As if the golden age of apostasy, were a golden
age of Church?!
o
So this thrice-nested anaphora runs from 308-343. Begins
with the 2nd eudokian anaphora (308, when Constantine is confirmed at Carnuntum); to the 2nd epainon anaphora (320, when he consolidates his first win over Licinius,
then focuses on controlling fractious 'fathers'); to the end of the proelpikotas phrase in 343, which ends the Temple Trio anaphora:
kata ten
boulen tou thelematos autou, eis to einai hemas eis epainon doxzes autou, tous
proelpikotas en toi Christoi.
o
Get this: In 337, Constantine dies. ON Pentecost.
Which FirstFruits, represents. But
only tous proel, finished. No 'pikotas'. No 'en toi Christoi.' Ouch. So he dies not completing Firstfruits. He didn't mature. So he died a spiritual retard ON
Pentecost, when the Harvest is due: meaning, he could have matured by
then. But did not. Imagine being him, and knowing that was your
'OER' at death.*
o
D'ya think God has Paul time these anaphorae, to teach something important? Keep in mind, Paul sits between two
praetorian guards, dictating Ephesians off the top of his head; or at least is
under house arrest (he rented a flat in Rome, see end of the Book of Acts). Message:
don't end up like Constantine. But the 'catholics' drool over this guy. So too, the Calvies and many other
Protties. Yikes. It's quite pathetic, to read the encomiums of
'Christian scholars', over the centuries.
They don't read Bible, either.
Obviously. How anyone can
regard Nicaea as an triumph instead of a nadir denouement, I'll never know.
1.
Constantine was
not a good ruler in God's eyes, since he united Church and State, creating the
Revelation 17 harlot that Diocletian
wanted; Theodosius will
formalize it in 379 and 395, thus
destroying the Roman Empire and its protect-the-Bible role since Augustus. All that will be set in motion by 343, when
our Temple Trio proelpikotas, ends.
So at
that point, only the few will
carry Time.
2.
But God had Constantine do one
thing of value: for a little while, he
authorized freedom of faith.
3.
Else Constantine's 'legacy', his
courting of Church support, fostered sporadic religious wars until the
20th century -- since now rival bishops had Imperial sanction hence
political clout, to destroy each other.
Which his short-lived sons and their unrelated successors, would carry
on. To our universal, shame.
4.
On the other hand, UNTIL the rival factions
got complete control under Theodosius, there
was freedom to argue and move around, as a Christian. Even under Theodosius and
his sons, the rival regents were so busy fighting with each other, the rival Christian
factions didn't have as much power as they wanted. In
effect, the bishops adopted Diocletian's harsh policies, in order to wipe out
rivals, Jews and pagans. So long as no one side had enough control,
there was an EXIT WINDOW so the FEW could run, hide, or otherwise escape
'church'. And thus, better learn Bible.
*Officer Evaluation Report
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd eudokian+3rd
epainon Appendix
II
Appendix I: How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History, 3rd eudokian,
continued
5.
So notice THEIR
'firstfruits', 334-343: versus how GOD used their evil to accomplish Autonomy to Study Bible. Constantine killed
his own wife, son and other close relatives;
then, he himself dies on Pentecost.
For the next six months, the sons murder all male relatives except Gallus and Julian. By 340, Constantine
II is dead; by 350, Constans. By 361, Constantius
II, under whom the Empire was briefly united. None of them had male kids. In fact, none of
them had any kids, except Constantius II had a
daughter, and she was barren. Neither Gallus (d.
354) nor Julian (d. 362) had kids; each of them lasted but couple of years,
once Emperor. So the entire line dies
out.
6.
Meanwhile, their mutual warring -- over
Trinity! -- caused mass migration, as the persecuted fled to
whatever territory was friendly to 'their' sect. Many left for Armenia (then
Christian, under Tiridates), or other parts beyond Imperial
power. Within the Empire, factions
killed each other, died out. Same
aftermath as in 133-140 Bar
Kochba revolt. Yeah,
graced-out, hes echaritwsen hemas. That is, if you took the parallel epainon
warning from 320-334: when
you see the abomination that causes desolation, RUN! Autonomy
resulted from Diaspora. Bible thus
spread more widely, than prior. Harder
to capture and burn Scripture, when it's not so bunched up together. Sometimes, we have to be kicked out. To remote places of quieter contemplation,
and hungrier unbelievers.
7.
They escape just in time, too. For now Rev 17 'Mother Church' apostasy
finally wins via Constantine's sons; so, Mariolatry rises. The two lies mesh, just as under the Severans. Finally made law under Pulcheria, as we
saw back in 431. So Church's (s)mothering lies, institutionalize. Christ is sidelined.
o
Now we reach the 3rd epainon anaphora.
Ends, at 425-434. Finishes the tandem decline of Christianity and thus Rome. Rhetorical style in Word and in Greco-Roman
literature: end a tale at a beginning, then leave the reader with
a Moral. The cause of a thing. Wed and Lived Happily Ever After. Or, Died And All Is Lost. Thus Euripides ended his play Ion, re Origin
of the Greek Peoples; on which play, Paul bases Ephesians: Origin of
Church Completion. So Revelation
ends at the start of Eternity; then The Moral, Rev 22:6-21. Thus goes this final epainon. How
Church History Ends -- in apostasy,
hence Rapture due to it -- which ending, begins
εἰς ἔπαινον τῆς
δόξης αὐτοῦ 434
Only
the Holy Spirit, is voting. And only HIS
vote, makes Church Complete. That's the
moral. So much for the vaunted
'we are the true faith' Catholic and Protestant popedoms, the self-styled
'apostles' or anyone claiming a 'vision' or 'special message' or 'appointment'
from God. Still as bad today, as back in
Constantine's time.
By their false doctrines you know them, Matt 7:15-23. Only the
Few Believers Carry Time, the maturing proelpikotas who ONLY
the Spirit makes. Maybe you. Maybe me.
Maybe one of our neighbors.
Definitely not, anyone who vaunts the 'church fathers' or their
ecumenical institutions birthed during the second and third centuries
post-Cross. They are the losers -- still
in heaven, if they ever once believed only in Christ's payment, but no rewards,
1Cor3 -- and that is the Prophetical Warning Of Church Retardation, here
in Ephesians 1:3-14. Heck, you'd know that from the text alone,
for Paul successively narrows rhetorical
focus to proelpikotas, the climax of his
rhetoric. Verses 13-14, explain it. Christ
was ONE FirstFruits. So the mature, are
FEW.
Rapture happens due to maximum Church apostasy, as
illustrated in Ephesians 1:13-14, updated in Revelation 1-3; a retardation which in the future, coincides
with the date when Spirit completes Maturation of Church, Eph 4:13. Which HE produced, via growing people spiritually
under whomever is their God-appointed pastor, Eph 4:16. Meanwhile, the babies still do menial jobs,
as they only WANT those jobs. Spirit
makes all that work, too.
So
indeed even an apostate pastor is used;
a growing believer eventually graduates from under him, to someone less
apostate. Then, to someone not
apostate. It's a full-spectrum process,
and it takes a lifetime. We each go
through this process. Some slowly, some
quickly; but all start at zero;
only the Holy Spirit, completes us.
Enfin, we are babies, doing baby jobs; the few who grow up, justify TIME for the
many who don't: that 50 years+, for
Church to Complete.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian
2nd eudokian God's Meaning 3rd eudokian 3rd
eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the
anaphora to History: Parallel
Time Balance Summary
(Note: I'm still auditing the Time Balance
Summary components. If you see other or
better balances -- or you see errors -- please tell me?)
So much
for Church history. What about balancing
to Adam, Millennium? Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 and Magnificat all
balance. So Paul does, too. Eudokian
anaphora:
1st 'pair' of eudokian bookends are between (years)
syllables 105 and 231 = 126, sum of 70+56, 18 sevens or 42 threes.
2nd 'pair', overlapping between syllables 215 and 231, ending at 320, 15 sevens, 35
threes. 33 sevens: The Lord's Age when He died.
Centered on the middle 'bookend' in verse 9. Double Rejection of Father and Son. 77 threes. 70 x 7 x 3
Rejection fulfilled from first David to Last.
Historical Parallel to same 231 syllables, as in Daniel 9:24-27. (See http://www.brainout.net/Dan924HebParsed.pdf)
God has Paul metrically balance Israel's past parallels
to Real future Time, to plot Church denouement. Lesson: Man Fails, God Succeeds. God's Good Pleasure, to put us in His Son;
all our failures won't stop Him achieving that goal. Since God knows we
hallucinate doing His Work for Him, He offers a prophetic timeline -- just as in Psalm 90 -- to show our
recurring hallucination, brings harm.
Then He saves us anyway. Bad
news, good news, Isaiah 54:1.
Ideally we'd heed Him, in advance.
History shows we don't.
So our rejection path is plotted, though always avoidable, just as it
was for Israel; but 'our' prophetic
timeline ends in a 434-year loop. So you
can never predict Rapture. 434='62
weeks'. So we are in that Time Loop of
History. Ergo Paul caps Eph1:3-14's
meter, at 434. 56 before, 56
after, Church is in the middle. Like
Noah, in the Ark. (The Noah
sandwiched-56 connection, is covered in the epainon
anaphora, two pages down.)
The eudokian
anaphora traces Autonomy, as only God's power creates it, one person at a time. Just God, and just you;
no group in goofy hats with goofier notions on spirituality, setting
rules. So here's the time path of that goofy group; how God's Good Pleasure
aka eudokia, defeats it. Pivot = 215-231,
the Severans; ends with 'Crisis
of Third Century'; when Ireneaus, Tertullian, Origen
and their ilk, birthed
'Mother Church'
to crush Autonomy (which
they call 'heresy'). Parallel: Temple Down prologue, 126 syllables of Isaiah
53:1-4; thus God fragments
birthed tyranny of 'Mother Church'. So
Rev1:1-3, written when 'sonship' lie of apostolic succession began, meters to the first eudokian
anaphora ('126') . (Rev
dateline is 91AD = 58 years after Christ died, Rev1:1 meter; =26 years after
Florus became procurator =Rev1:2 meter; sum =84 years after Judaea became a
province: first time divisible by 7.
=Psalm 90:1-4 meter sum 84 = God's Full Decree WITH Millennium. Finally,
Rev 1:3=42 syllables=Isaiah 52:13+14 and 53:12;
sum 'tags' both 126's in Isa53, and Paul's eudokian
play on Isaiah, here.)
Eudokian factors: [(70+56)+(70+35)]: God uses bad voting, to create Freedom. He communicates this, by metrical parallel to
similar times in Israel's history.
o 105+70, takes you to Commodus; period began with anti-semitic,
self-promoting Christians like Ignatius and later Justin
Martyr, becoming popular;
between, 'bishops' apostatized into regional 'powers'; examples are so-called 'councils'
of 155 - 193 AD. Parallels Isaiah
53:3-4, which ends at 586 bc,
Temple
Down due to bad voting.
o
175+56, invention of Mother
Church. Hence civil
war and Diaspora; mated to Isaiah
53:5+6, spans 586-530 bc
when Cyrus died; civil war in Persia, also ensued.
o
231+70 takes you to Diocletian's economic fiats, presaging persecution.
For Apostate Church, voted badly.
Mates to Isaiah
53:7+8, 530-460 bc:
Temple was up by 516. Voting
period ran 467-397 bc; then OT
Canon ends, due to apostasy. In 460 bc, low votes put Jerusalem at risk (see Nehemiah). So too,
Apostate Church in 301 AD.
o
301+35 ends at Constantine's death. Mates to 425 bc =
'crush' in Isaiah 53:10. (Mid-voting period.) So, God
crushed Constantine; for in 325 'Mom' voted to overrule BIBLE's date of Firstfruits aka Easter, changing times and seasons, Dan7:25. So he BEGAN to die on April 3 = true passover per
bible, when Christ Died. (See PassPlot.htm for details.) = Start of 337, in Jewish terms -- but 'Mom' rejected Jews, so couldn't even count
to three. Per Apostate Church, he
died on Pentecost. So missed real
Pentecost by a week, as his fiat made their calendar 'god'. So he dies proel, no pikotas, as he hoped in bishops. Constantine's sons then slay each other. No progeny
survived.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: Parallel eudokian Time Balance Summary, continued
o
33
sevens Theme: Israel's 'sons' Rejected
Christ; Church 'sons' reject Him, too. 'Church pleasure', is lust to kill Autonomy. God's Good Pleasure, saves
Autonomy. We just saw how God operated
in then-future, Church history. Okay,
but how does He Reconcile All Time,
via Church? For that's what Ephesians
1:10, claims.
o
So
Reconciliation begins with the eudokian
anaphora at 231 syllables, keyed to Daniel 9:24-27: Rebuild-and-Destroy
Temple Trend runs Church Age. Temple is based on David, 2 Sam 7's promise
of Temple & Sons. Problem is, Temple
Construction Was Delayed 3.5 years after David died. So Last David aka
Messiah dies, then the 50 years; then 3.5 years and Temple Down. That 53.5 reimburses for Abraham's too-early maturation; last 3.5 'repays' Delay In Construction. But Christ died 'a week early', so Trib
can't begin until Our Time is completed, Hebrews 11:39-40. For The Head Rose, but we are Body of
Christ. [Temple
rebuilding: six months upfront on
materials, 1Kings 5; then 7 years building Temple: see 1Kings 6:1 in LXX, and
2Chron 3:2. Parallel to David ruling 7.5
years in Hebron (1Chron 3:4). Bible uses
'last birthday' convention, so David's birthmonth was likely between Bul and
Ziv?]
o Paul uses at least two Time Balance
formulas, in what follows. First he uses
the raw meter total (here 231). Then he converts to 'bc' via - 56 or 57 (or 50+6 or 50+7), and any meter overlap (16, here). That yields at least three balancing results
to past and future events. Those
three, tie to other events. And so
on. For you can plot the entire
timeline from Adam via Paul's audit.
So we know believers routinely audited Time. For Paul writes to an audience, proves scripture to them. And hence, to us.
For Paul's theme is How God in Christ Makes Church Converge
All Time (verse 10). So he uses meter, to prove
it: folks then accounted Time as
years-from-event-x. Counting
syllables is Jewish tradition (vital to their recitations), and key to Greek literature; so meter plays 'wristwatch', too.
Second
formula, is total * 7. It
reconciles, inter alia, from Millennial End at 5250 from Adam. Bible reconciles BACKWARDS from ENDPOINTS (i.e., years from next Jubilee). So Moses, Isaiah, Daniel and
Paul reckon from End Of Time, as 'how long': God keeps His Promise. Paul also
sets off old time (to 4200) as
'left side' in the equation, by - 56 or 57, - 98, 490, 560, or even -1050. Many events are tagged and
balanced. This Time Balance subsection displays only some events, to show his methods.
o 231 depicts Daniel 9:26c Time Bubble as Trend and Bridge of Church History: engus, euthus,
always on verge
of Tribulation = Max Apostasy. So Paul mated verses and meter values to parallel future Church apostasy
to Israel's past (just as Magnificat had
done) as we saw on the previous page. For Temple=Christ:
·
First
formula, raw total: 164 bc, 1st Chanukah or 167 bc
desecration = Lord's Birth Day, Haggai 2, +66
= start Temple Year
231. So Rapture/Trib = 63 - 70 ad. Temple Year accounting 'talks
to' Dan 9:27's midpoint. Temple Down = His Age 33 + 33, not
40. Isa 53:4: Lord Struck at age 33. Paul marks 66, verse 4, at 7 syllables. 4103
-164 = Antiochus' desecration; -161 = Chanukah, in Paul's bc/ad conversion; so Paul
ties to Antiochus at 66, Chanukah at 70. Note: refund due on Abraham's too-early
maturation was 54. So Tribulation here, is unlikely.
Yet it can happen, since Rapture occurs due to Christian apostasy.
·
Second
formula, total sevened: 231 * 7 =
1617 -
560 (new time
grant, 490+70) = 1057 from David's All-Israel Crowning, start of year Paul writes. Also, 5250 - 1057 = 4193 (end), when Temple to go down (mid-Trib). Then again, 4193 - 1057 = 3136, when David retired. Mirror=Time
Pivot. On which the future-prior, or
future-now, hangs.
· - 57 = 1000, Christ Born 1000th year
of David's (united) Kingship. Paul stresses Time Begins Anew with His Birth. 1560 = first three New Civilization Time Grant units.
· 1617 - 16 (eudokian overlap)
- 560 = 1041 (start) = age 40 when Christ should have died, had
Israel voted yes, in Dan 9:19
& 26's '62 weeks': living as long as David was king (counting from Hebron). Then He was to die 1000th year of David's death (but instead dies 7 years prior). Paul will balance to that also, in the epainon anaphora.
· 1617 + 16 - 1050 = 583 bc
when 1st Temple died, in Paul's equivalent of 'bc'.
+ 56 more = Manasseh's age at and death year: 2Kings 21:11-15, reason for Temple Down.
·
David was born 1040 bc. = Isaiah 53's meter
'start'. Mirror. Audit balance.
So eudokian
meter theme of 33
sevens, Christ = Temple, hence
Trib Start and Temple Down
'tagged' To Each 'David'; but
Church now occupies that 62nd 'week'.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the
anaphora to History: Parallel
epainon Time Balance Summary
Next, nested epainon
anaphora:
1st nest, syllables 334-133 = 67 threes +434-320, 38 threes = 105 threes or 45 sevens.
38
threes = God's Meter in Daniel 9:25+26. (Video here.)
2nd nest, overlaps at 320-334. So epainon centers, where eudokian ends. Its first 12 syllables
(121-133) are omitted.
Now plot thickens: 105 threes = Daniel 9:14-19 +
elided 7; or 365 syllables, + elided 57. One Year.
The epainon thus balances to Noah's Year in the Ark, in each Daniel 9 and this epainon. All of verses 3-14 are based on that theme.
For Dan 9:14-19 runs 308 syllables = days Noah
in Ark by his 601st birthday, per LXX (see DAN9V4-19HebOnePagerPARSED.RTF).
Daniel 9:14-19's indictment and petition:
So God brought this evil upon us, please restore Temple aka Bible for
Your Holy Name's sake.
Ephesians tie: Bishop 'Kings'
Fail as Israel Did. So God will
'flood' them. Ties to Psalm 90:5.
Epainon is Care For Bible. Its pivot = 320-334, when anti-semitic Constantine & 'Church' unite.
So God ends Rome, four generations later. Western Empire ends 476. Its end began when
Christians relegate Bible to 'priest elites', who then usurp it: an idolatry,
as Rev17 depicts. The epainon sums 315 = Noah's 308 days in Ark to his birthday, + 7 for Passover week.
Trib quality. [Councils appeal to Caesar, not
God: Arles,
314, negates Bible's Easter Date; in 315, Neo-Caesarea,
silly despotic laws about marriage and ordination.]
For Church disdained God's epainon, instead seeking Caesar's and its own; so God will flood out apostate church, give Bible
Care to others. So
Paul traces Decline of Care For Bible by mating epainon meter to Daniel 9:14-19, which parallels
Flood; then, Paul mates the Flood
'calendar' severally. First 70+40+91 epainon bloc, also mates to Noah's time in Ark after rain ends, but before
he sent raven. (Per LXX, not BHS.) The 2nd epainon bloc, 57+57, also piggybacks to Daniel 9:25+26's meter, which itself mated to Noah's entry/exit. The epainon factors: [(70+40+91)+(57+57)].
o 133+70=203, Gen 7:24-8:5. Flood Bathtub: the prior 40 days (=years) were rain, preceded by 57 as warning. Ties to (end) 93 and 36 AD (pre-Church schedule for Temple Down, if Christ had
died on time). So it's bath-time: Severans. Mommies bathe brats; Church
'baptised' by mommifying,
politicizing, prelates. If you argue over Easter's date, baptism
and God's Nature, you can't read Bible.
Hall of Shame. Guess John 19, 1 Peter 3:18-22, Heb1:1-3, Philippians
2:5-10, 2Cor13:14 weren't in their Bibles.
o 203+40, Gen 8:4, Ark
(Ar)rests In Bathtub. Crisis of 3rd Century. Bishops persecute
each other
over Rev 17 purple.. er, scarlet. Roman
prelates, profit
from it.
o
243+91, Gen 8:5, Mountaintops
Visible. Exit Window Opens 334, when Constantine revokes Nicaea; so causes brawling bishops. His sons die
fighting for one side or another. Constantius II dies last, no fertile issue. End
Constantines. Weird, petty
laws re Church, multiply (under Valentinian and sons). Laws. Not Bibles.
o 334+57+57=448, Gen 8:14,
Exodus from Ark. End Of Western Empire, Odovacer. Newly age 15, Roman age of manhood. A demon-influenced saint, promised him
power. Others were busy killing Jews
and free speech in the new (IV,2) Theodosian
Code; it
tyrannized everyone (see also 425-434 section). Very popular.
57+57 denote Judgment
and Deliverance. 57 days before Noah enters Ark; 57 days he waits post-birthday to leave = Pentecost and 9th Av, respectively. Same paired 57's as God's Reply in Dan9:25+26. Delivered by Odovacer, frees up the West. His empire dies at end Temple
Trio meter, 56+56=112 years later, in 560AD, when the first 'AD' (from Lord's Birth) 490 plus its voting period, ends. Justinian Code
born then (read 'Novella 146'). Justinian
allegedly builds atop Temple, in 560. [Bk 5 #7 p.157 of Procopius
(here, in English) says Nablus.] Mohammed, born 560 or 570, allegedly
'ascends' from it. Both leaders loved hurting Jews. So, both died without issue.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: Parallel epainon 45 sevens Time
Balance Summary, continued
a.
Epainon
45 sevens meter = 315. Balance to old Mill schedule, shows Christ's
earlier death Changes Schedule,
as Church is under construction.
As epainon meter invokes Noah and Daniel
9, their times are parallel. Paul maps contingencies.
Text and meter, show why. Meter conveys vital doctrine to certify
Word 'coordinates'.
b.
315 - 57 =
258 = 164 + 94. Temple
Down is depicted for its Year 258 after (initial) Chanukah; equals Rapture/Trib for 90-97
AD. Equals Trib mid-point, under old Schedule. Original
Harvest-Gentiles sum, based on when the Lord should
have died, plus 50 years. Notice Paul added 57 years, post-4200; means Rapture won't likely happen on old schedule. For Eph1:5's
'sonship' text begins at 94. The eudokian doesn't begin until 105= start 4207. Meaning? If Rapture won't
happen by 90, it ain't gonna for at least 28 more years. Total overage from verse 4c is another
56. Why? Too Few Sons Built. So Paul emphasizes that imbalance, to
stress Church being late to
mature.
c.
Or, - 54-year hiatus 'twixt Dan 9:26,
and mid-27; thus 94 becomes 97, when Millennium was to begin. To 'repay time owed Gentiles', as Abraham matured 54
years early. Ergo, Trib is split into 3.5 year
segments. In the eudokian, we saw this last segment 'repays' Delay In Temple Construction. Rev 11-12, tie: note its sarcasm
re building the Temple, in Rev 11. Temple then standing was not authorized by God, so He treats it
as still down. Wrong Time.
Wrong Builder. Wrong herald. (So John only writes, never
'measures' for a FOUNDATION; thus we know whatever's built, is deemed NOT TO
EXIST. So God is sarcastic. The two SACKLOTHED 'Witnesses', add sarcasm.) ABomination, just as Dome of the
Rock, now. [John writes in 91 AD due to Church apostasy: the OT Rapture/Trib 'deadline', won't be met.
Trib midpoint should have been 94. So John writes in 91, to remind them of
these Pauline 'schedules'.]
d.
Hence 94 = Lord's Age is benchmarked, verse 5's meter: Pleasure,
Praise, Progeny, Isaiah53:10-11. Eph 1:5, Sonship. Sons for
Abraham, from Sons of The Christ. So 40 + 57 = 97 -3.5 = 94. Paul focuses on Temple Down, as that's a timed event. Count
3.5 backwards, to get the start. Still
can't predict Rapture. Can explain its timing.
e.
4103
- 164 = Antiochus' desecration; -161 = Chanukah, in Paul's bc/ad conversion;
so Paul ties to Antiochus, not Chanukah.
(Add 3, to get conventional bc.)
f.
So how does
all that meter, also balance the past? Watch: 315 * 7 = 2205 - 57 = 2148 from what? Abraham supermatured mid-year 2046, when Noah's 490-year time grant ran out.
Properly, 4103
-2148 = 1946, when Abraham was born (start). Also, 2046 + 2148 = 4194, start of old Scheduled Trib (=4193 end year). Equals our 91AD. (The Lord was
born last quarter of Jewish year, and end of Roman year. So 90=91, etc. Bible is very precise. Many times the calculation is at the
beginning of the year, sums one more than expected.)
· More Tribulation scenarios,
balance to Abraham and Noah. Paul
reconciles to everyone else, through them. Note how the 54 years owed on Abraham aren't fully paid, unless
Temple goes down in 87 or later. So if the Temple
goes down sooner, it's not likely to trigger the Rapture. These scenarios aren't predicated on a Temple
calendar reference, so can be midpoints or beginnings. To balance any of these to Noah, add 490 to 2205, subtract from 2046.
· -7, yields a Tribulation period of 84 - 90, which Paul benchmarked in verse 4.
· Or, -14, yields 77 - 84, which Paul also benchmarked with its own seven.
· Or, -7 -14 = 21, yields
70 - 77. Paul benchmarked only the 77.
g.
Another meter tie to Noah, who was 308
days in Ark from entry to 601st birthday.
Dan9:14-19's meter thus = 308, to invoke legal precedence for his petition, based on Noah's Bathtub Time in Ark. Implicit/elided, is 50 years to Harvest
Gentiles = Jubilee. For Abraham supermatured to 'catch' the 490-year
baton from Noah, a
Gentile. So Paul Apostle TO Gentiles, adds 7 to = 315 in the epainon meter, creating an updated balance to Daniel: Time is now post-Cross, still inside an unfinished,
62nd week. Noah's
still in das Boot. So
Paul now concurrently balances to Noah,
Abraham and Daniel, to show
result of Christ dying early, and Church under construction:
· 308 + 56 = 364. Next, 364 * 7 = 2548 + 2046 = 4104 (late 4103), Christ is born a
'year' after Abraham supermatured. Hence four 91's in Paul's meter, plus 56+14.
· 308 * 8 = 352 * 7. 352 + 12 = 364. Paul left 12 syllables out of the epainon (which began
at syllable 121), instead starting it at syllable 133. Now you see why.
· 315 * 8 = 360 * 7. 360, Noah sent dove the last time. = Exodus 12, Lamb
Set Aside. 365, is his birthday. On what
becomes, Passover. = 364.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: Parallel epainon 45 sevens Time
Balance Summary, continued
h.
70 - 77 Trib scenario, balanced to Temple Down and Noah's birthday aka the Flood.
315 * 7 + 315 years after Flood start (1655 from
Adam), Temple dies start of 73 AD, if Church matures. Flood of troops, Dan9:26c: meter, 57 syllables. The second 57, Noah exits. 57+57 =
Passover to 9th Av. Daniel 9:27, Temple goes down mid-week. These are not begin-Trib metaphors. The Noahic metaphor is AFTER the 40 days'
rain (analogous to David's death preceding). Cute: since at 73, the Temple
would have been up 40 years from the Lord's actual death. The 315 also ties as a syllable marker to Isa53:3-10 (Purim, 315th syllable, Isa53:8; Purim is 308 years before Antiochus), Ps90:1-4 (Millennium, syllable 315 ends Ps90:16, very
pregnant). Both of
those passages denote middles, not beginnings.
So 73 can only be a Trib mid-point to the previously-balanced to Abraham, 70-77 period. So 73 cleverly coincided with hagious in verse 4: HOLY Temple (us, in the
verse).. DOWN.
· 73 = Temple Year 231 +
7 = 17 years after Paul writes. [It's really start of 17th
year; Paul writes 16 years after the Lord
should have died. So Paul mirrors the
year he writes, to Temple Down. Isaiah 53 first used this technique, dating
Isaiah 53:1, at 126 years before Temple would go down; 126 syllables=years later, it's 126 years
short of its own 490. Jews kept calendars of Years from Exodus, David, Temple,
other events. So people Paul wrote, knew these numbers. Google on 'Kaluach 3',
for a modern version. It's wrong, but
still shows the years-from idea.]
· Balance to this Trib mid-point. 315
o - 57 (Here Paul uses the -57 currently, as new time belonging to Church which
'belonged' to the Gentiles anyway, no
longer 50, but the last 57 years of the 1050 ending in 4200.)
o - 7 (which Paul added
to Daniel's 308; due to Him dying seven years earlier than scheduled.)
o - 14 (2nd epainon overlap) = 237 (end year).
· 73 = 40 years after
Christ actually died, so Israel's late entry into the Land can be 'repaid' by
Temple still standing in it, during Church. Paul embedded the 14; if seven of the 14 are
'paid' taking the Temple down (as actually happens), then the same 7 years
repays Jews and Gentiles. Just as those 14 years in Diaspora paid both.
· Notice how this careful balancing, i.e., for time owed the Land (whaaa???)
and for Abraham's too-early maturity -- tells you Rapture
can occur at the WRONG time. So then
Satan would win, since God didn't keep his promise to Israel. Paul balances to OT promises,
here. They are still relevant.
· A Year 70 Trib beginning = 1077th year of David's Hebron Kingship, if Church matures. Year 77 = 1077th year of David's United Kingship = 1000th year of his death. Paul benchmarks the 77, at the end of verse 4.
· Thus Paul has balanced five sets of (rounded)
Tribulation scenarios to Noah, Abraham, David, Temple, Daniel and the Lord Jesus
Christ:
o Old 90..94..97 schedule. The 94 was used to
benchmark, verse 5.
o New 63..66..70 schedule, benchmarked in verse 4's middle. In the eudokian anaphora.
o or a 70..73..77 schedule. Not explicitly benchmarked.
o Next, a 77..80..84 schedule, specially set off as a 7, end verse 4.
o an 84..87..90 schedule. This one kicked off
verse 5.
o Finally, notice that without this balancing, you'll mistake Rapture's
'place' as mid-Trib or end-Trib. So the meter is especially helpful, here. Church has no part in Jewish Time. It was birthed after the Cross, due to Israel's Late Construction, theme of
Romans 11. For that reason, no one can predict it. That's another point Paul stresses, by
running scenarios. He runs them to illustrate the underlying why of Rapture, not to make date-setters
drool!
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul
'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary
Note: this is a very complex section. If your eyes glaze over, skip to page 134-135
to see the result, and watch the videos here:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1bv_xPIih3fJ_mckYoeN2TCpVlaMztdg&feature=view_all
o
Sum
eudokian (lit., 'good opinion') plus epainon (lit., 'good report') anaphora = Ark analogy, 78 sevens = 546 = [(70+56) + (70+35)] + [(70+40+91) +
(57+57)] = 56+365+70 + 56.
eudokian versus epainon overlap balances to
434 - 105 = 329 (329th syllable in Isaiah 53 = 460
BC). Idea that
Temple 490 continues, in Church.
Eudokian: 1st 'pair'
runs between (years) syllables 105 and 231 = 126, sum of 70+56, 18 sevens or 42 threes.
2nd 'pair', starts syllable 215 (overlaps until 231); ends at 320 = 15 sevens, 35 threes. 33 sevens: Lord's Age at Death.
Epainon: 1st nest runs
between syllables 133 - 334 = 67 threes. 2nd nest runs syllables 320
- 434 = 38 threes.
Summed epainon = 105 threes or 45 sevens. The 38 threes = God's Meter in
Daniel 9:25+26.
2nd nest, overlaps at 320-334. So epainon centers, where eudokian ends. Its first 12
syllables (121-133) are omitted.
So the 78 sevens total = 546 - 112 (= Temple Trio meter,
wholly embedded) = 434.
The individual overlaps are 16
in eudokian, gross of 14 in epainon; for eudokian counted the first epainon 12 (from 121-133);
between them, is an overlap from 133 to 320 = 187. Finally, the first 105 syllables are omitted from both.
So overlap adjustments sum: -112 -16 -14 -187 = 329.
o 33 sevens eudokian theme: Christ = Temple. Values balanced to 63-70 AD Trib scenario,
then to David's Kingship 1000 and the Lord at birth, death, year Paul wrote.
o
45 sevens epainon theme: Ark=Flood=Pregnancy. Values balanced to 4 other Trib
scenarios, to Abraham, Noah, and David's
1077th year = Lord's 70th OR 77th Year.
o
78 sevens combined theme: 1078th year of
David = Isaiah 53's meter base. Starts The Lord's 78th human
year = His 77th
Birthday; Paul marks it in verse 4.
[Isaiah summed his syllables on a base of 154 x 7 = 1078 - 462 actual
syllables - 364 elision between Isaiah 53:10 and 11 for Temple longevity being
regranted presaging Daniel 9, and 252 elided between David's death accounting
end Isa 52:15, and the 712BC forward account start in Isaiah 53:1. Daniel used that to key off his kings
chronology in Daniel 9:6 through end verse 14, dating from David's Hebron
Kingship.]
o
Balances to 8th 490 since Adam's Fall, also parallels Noah's exit. 78
sevens = 56 + 365 + 70 + 56, Ark =
Cross = Church Pregnancy, Rom8:11ff until Eternity Is Born. So Paul balances to Adam, as Christ is Last Adam: 56 = Dan9:27's end, if Israel voted Yes. But she didn't. So that 56 = forfeited Time. So now, there is
new Time, since Christ won on the Cross, so 'bought' a new 490. 434 years to go = Paul's
meter. Paul thus parallels Church TEMPLE
role of Buying Time: 546 = 56 + 490. Setup for Eph 2.
o
So do parsed values, interweave
these themes? Let's see. 546
- 98, the Lord's Age very end Year 4200 from Adam (starts His 98th year aka
Millennium) = 448. Equates to 'bc'. Add the
missing 12 in first
epainon
= start of 460 bc =
end 1st Temple's 490 Time Grant at syllable = year of Isaiah 53:8's end. [Isaiah balanced to
Temple's 490.]
o
Next, -14 of 2nd epainon. 460 - 14
= start of 446 = year 2nd 70 Time Grant in Daniel 9 ends, kicking off the
69 weeks = Isaiah 53:9b. Or 460 + 14 = Purim.
o
546 + 57 -14 (2nd epainon overlap) +12 (1st epainon elision) = 601, Noah's birthday at exit
Flood. Or, start of his 601st year at
his 600th birthday.
o So get this: 601 x 7 = 4207, seven years beyond the old Millennium. Hanging chad. Or, play on David's Hebron kingship.
o
546 + 57 = 603 - 16 (eudokian overlap) = 586, Year Temple Down (in August,
so = 587 end year). reason for hanging chad = end Isaiah 53:4.
o
Next, 586
- 57. Year Cyrus died, end 530 start 529
bc = Isaiah 53:6 end. Hence Temple Reconstruction Delayed, civil war in Persia (i.e., pseudo-Smerdis). Paul paralleled it in Church
history with the Severans (syllables = years 231 et seq.), when Mother
Church was newly minted by Irenaeus and his fellow apostates who used it to war against
Christians. They all called tyranny,
'unity'; so secular rulers also warred. Christian
history, determines secular history.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, continued
o
Next, 546
- 528 = 18 (16+14-12) overlap in eudokian plus epainon anaphora. Year 4200, when Millennium was to begin = year 98 (at start): OT Canon was 528 years finished. Daniel 9's 'seven weeks' closes OT Canon, 397 bc = Malachi: Year 3673 from Adam. God's Good Pleasure Completes Word so
His Praise can be in our hearts, Matt 4:4. Also, 546 * 7 -112 -16 -14 -7 (Paul added 7 to epainon to update Daniel's 308 to 315) = 3673. Which was, 1007 years after the
Exodus. Seven years late.
o Millennium End = 5250 from Adam, 750 sevens; Dan9:19 ends in only 742 sevens: 56 was elided. Meaning, Time
in Abeyance. God answers in Daniel's meter: 63 syllables, Dan 9:24; 57 in each Dan 9:25-26; 54 syllables in Dan 9:27. (Video here, pdf here.) Paul pairs the
56=57 meter three times, once per anaphora.
So Paul datelines Ephesians 1:4 at 56. So when
Rapture didn't occur by 70 or 91, most rejected its promise. [Prior examples in Acts 1, 1Thess4:13-17 and 2Thess2, Philippians 3:8-14,
Hebrews 2 and 10, 1John 2:26-3:2, 2Peter3.]
Noah Key: 546 * 7 = 3822 -112 -16 -14 -187 = 3493. But 78*7 = 546 * 7 = 3822
-112 -16 (overlaps in the anaphora, omitting the
pregnant 14) = 3694.
5250 - 3694 = 1556, when
Noah got his covenant at age 500, evidenced by the triplets, Gen 6:10-13.
Abraham-to-Hebron Key: 5250 - 1077 =
4173 - 1077 = 3096. Mirror to Millennium End. Based on 1077
end = 1078 beginning. Equidistance.
For 78*7 - 56 = 490, *7 = 3430 – 112 – 16 –
14 – 12 -187+7 = 3096. Mirror, Mirror on the wall: whose 'Messiah', saved us all?
First Chanukah, this time
(same as Mary's balancing
base). 4173 - 3942 (Chanukah) = 231, again.
o David's Hebron
Kingship dates 3096 from Adam, and 1050 from Abraham's
maturation. David was then age 30, in 430th year post-Exodus. United Kingship, 3103, he was age 37. He dies at age 77. 1 Kings 6:1 shows Temple Built
Late, started 3.5 years after David died.
o
Lord Born King 1000 years later, so from Hebron Kingship born the 1007th year. So David would have been
age 1037. 40 years later, David would be age 1077, and the Lord would be age 40, in the 1040/1047th Kingship year of David. The
Lord was to die this 1077th year = the 1000th year of David's death, ending Daniel 9:26's 62nd week. The Lord died instead, 7 years prior. Ergo, another seven-year hanging chad, since He died in the
61st 'week', instead.
o
So
this Equidistance Play of Two 1077's
(see table here), is also dual: there are two
persons who will have two 1077
anniversaries, and of two types:
age, and kingship.
The idea is to make it excruciatingly obvious that Jesus the Christ is the
Messiah. Only God can
orchestrate time, and especially in wry multiple parallels with real history
you can test. Which matters a lot,
since math numbs the mind. So with six parallels to '1077', maybe you'll notice at least ONE of them? [587+490, Daniel 9
error by Eusebius. From NT you can prove
Rapture was expected in 70AD. So 1077AD
End of Time, versus 1077BC start of David?
Didn't work. So I finally had to
plot GeneYrs.xls. Which later
led to this meter thingy, now.]
o
So: when David is 77 years old, it's his 47th kingship anniversary. Then he
dies. Paul plays on it, end verse 3, 1047 = Lord at 47, Who died 14 years prior. In 1033rd year of David's United Kingship, not Hebron. The intervening seven years were civil war in Israel, 2Sam5. So Paul wryly stresses the hanging chad, via
the 7 years between kingships. So the Lord died 1040th year of Hebron
Kingship, so was cut 7, too; and civil war in Israel, followed. Over what? Faith in Christ! That civil war continues. So Paul stresses
parallelism and causality via meter, to show how God Orchestrates Time.
o The Lord is age 77 in 1084th year of David's Hebron Kingship, 1077th year of United Kingship. That
year, is 4180. 14 years later, is the originally-scheduled
Tribulation Start: 1091st year of David's United Kingship (start of year). The Lord would be newly 90. Start of David's 1098th year of Hebron Kingship.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, continued
o
David born 400 years post-Exodus, 830 years after Jacob entered
Egypt (Exo 12:40-41), age 130 (Gen 47:9) = Abraham's 1120th year (Gen 21:5 + Gen
25:26). Flood
began 1410 years prior, 2010 years after Noah's birth. Solomon began Temple 480 years after Exodus; David's 80th year, 50th Hebron and 43rd Jerusalem Kingship year.
o Lord is born 1007-50 = 1000-43 years later = 1437th year from Exodus. He dies age
33 = 1470th Exodus year = 490
x 3 = David's age 1070 = 1040th Hebron Kingship year = 1033rd united (Jerusalem) Kingship year. The Lord should have died 7 years later = 1477th Exodus year = David's age 1077 = Isaiah 53's meter (= 1078, start = end 1077) = 1047th Hebron Kingship year = 1040th United Kingship year = Daniel's meter and the 69 weeks. Scholars misaccount those weeks as lunar,
so miss the extra 7.
o Now we tie again to The Flood. Moses metrically dated Psalm
90 at start of 1051st year of Flood, 40 years post-Exodus. So the Lord died Flood year 2480, was born Flood year 2447.
Millennium should have begun Flood year 2544, His Age 97
= 1534 years post-Exodus = start 1098th/1105th Davidic
Kingship year, David's age 1135.
o Yellow diagonal below = 4136: Lord died 33 years post-Birth; that was 583 years post-1st Temple death; that was 364 years after its birth; that was 13 years after David died; that was 40 years after he was King over Israel; that was 7 years after his crowning
at Hebron; that was 30 years after his birth; that was 400 years post-Exodus; that was 620 years after Abraham matured; that was 390 years post-Flood; that began 600 years after Noah's birth; that was 1056 years after Adam Fell.
o So we know Paul's '56' is three years later by our standards, as we misread 1Kings 6:1. There is a 3-year hiatus between David's
death and Temple building, so the Lord had to be born three years earlier, to
meet David's 1000-year deadlines. But
scholars used Josephus, not Bible, so
errantly added age 70 to the 3-year hiatus, and hence claim
Exodus, Temple Down, etc. are 3 years
earlier than they were. This error was
masked by an offsetting error, when we switched to bc/ad. So we claim
the Lord was born 3 years earlier than He was. Hence the
3-6 year variance in our 'corrections'.
So our '59' is really His Age 56.
End of Year, meaning the beginning of Year 57.
o 78 sevens' double-1077 tallies to Abraham and Noah, as did the 45
sevens. Here,
formula = 3822-546-180 not 187. Paul added 7 to Daniel's 308; so Paul now omits
7. The 546 alone is future time, so is
debited. 180 is net overlap (David was 30 when King, so
that 'embedding' is not debited). Paul starts with
Flood year 1655, adds 1050, ties back to Moses' date for Psalm 90. Flood
started a new civilization, so requires a 1050 tally. Paul next adds 1050,
now ties to Daniel 9's timetable. Takes
us to 3756 = Alexander the Great's birth, 46 years into post-OT Canon
historical 490, see GeneYrs.xls. Then Paul adds 54 = 3810 = circa 296 bc,
Third Samnite War, Rome
thus masters Italy over next 12 years (= omitted 1st
epainon meter) = 284 bc at Dan 9:19 (see its Chrono
Chart for that verse), as God gave him back in Daniel 7-8 = Rome
rises. (Or see
here or here.)
o So notice: 1050 + 1050 + 54 = 1077 x 2. Bible Time
Mirrors prove audit success. Equidistance from Flood to Rome Rising, add another 1077
x 2 = Millennium.
Paul writes here about future Roman and hence Church history, so
this past tie for his Greco-Roman audience, would matter. He's thus reconciled from Noah to Flood to Abraham to Moses to Daniel to Greece and to Rome -- so all those
prophecies, with David sandwiched in between -- are accounted.
Okay, but what about the Davidic accounting? So now the overlap
between 3096 when David
becomes king +1077+1077 to Millennium, and the accounting overlap from 3096 to 3822, tie to Daniel. Difference? 726. Minus the 329 overlap in the meter? 397. You can't call this, 'coincidence'. God
balances Time as a financial transaction. Time allowed must BUY something. So here Paul shows it buys the Millennium. Through, Church. Planned, since before Adam. Just as the Bible text says plainly, so too
the meter.
o So the originally-scheduled Millennium was to start 1105th year of Hebron Kingship, 1098th year of United Kingship: the Lord would be newly 97 years old, starting His 21st year after age 77, 28th year after age 70. His age 70: year 4173 from Adam, 1070 from United Kingship, 1077 from Hebron Kingship. 14 years after Paul writes.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to
History: eudokian+epainon
78 sevens Time
Balance Summary, continued
Year 1077's
o Year 1050 from Noah's birth in 1056 From Adam's Fall
(FAF) = birth of Jacob = 2106 FAF.
Exodus
Year: (560). Flood
Year: 450.
o Year 2000 from Noah's birth, Israel rejects God as King = 3056 FAF.
Israel in slavery 390 yrs, Acts 13:20ff.
Exodus
Year: 390. Flood Year: 1400.
o Year 1050 from Abraham's supermaturation 2046 FAF
(Isaac born) = 3096 FAF, David King at Hebron.
Exodus
Year: 430. Flood Year: 1440.
See also Exo 12:40-41 'mirror'.
o Year 1050 from Jacob's birth 2106 FAF = 1st
Temple Dedicated = 3156 FAF. Temple Year: 1.
Exodus
Year: 490. Flood Year: 1500. Moses' 490 also ends in 3156.
o Temple Dies Year 3520 FAF, 126
years short of its own 490-year allotment. Temple
Year: 364, (70).
Exodus
Year: 854. Flood Year: 1864.
o 2nd
Temple Construction Start, 3570 FAF. Foundation finished 24/25 Chislev. Temple Year: 414, (20).
Exodus
Year: 904. Flood Year: 1914.
o 2nd
Temple Construction Completed, 3590 FAF.
Moses age 1004.
Temple
Year: 434, 1.
Exodus
Year: 924. Flood Year: 1934.
o 1st
Chanukah, 3942 FAF. Foundation Anniv; Antiochus IV
desecration 3 yrs prior. Temple
Year: 786, 352.
Exodus
Year: 1276. Flood Year: 2286.
o Year 1000 from David's
Hebron Kingship is 4096 FAF.
Temple
Year: 940, 506.
Exodus
Year: 1430.
Flood
Year: 2440.
o Year 1000 from David's United Kingship is 4103 FAF, Lord Born.
Temple Year: 947,
513.
Exodus
Year: 1437. Flood Year: 2447. = 'our' 4BC, EARLIER deadline.
o Year 1050 after Israel rejects God as King = 4106 FAF, 2000 yrs after Jacob born. Temple Year: 950,
516.
Exodus
Year: 1440. Flood Year: 2450. = 'our' 1AD, when Christ
should have been born, LATEST deadline. Moses meters Psalm 90 between 1050th anniv. of Flood, and 1050st year
before Messiah born: when Israel will
reject God as King.
o Year 1070 from David's birth = 1040 Hebron, 1033 United Kingship = 4136 FAF. Temple Year: 980, 536.
Exodus
Year: 1470. Flood Year: 2480.
o Lord's death, age 33 = 4136 FAF, exactly on Anniv. of 1st Passover.
Temple Year: 980.
Exodus
Year: 1470. Flood Year: 2480.
o Year 1077 from
David's birth, 1000 from his death = 4143 FAF.
Temple
Year: 987, 543.
Exodus
Year: 1477. Flood Year: 2487. = Daniel 9:26, 57 years to Millennium.
o Lord's age at
death should
have been 40, 4143 FAF. Temple Year: 987. Exodus Year: 1477.
Flood
Year: 2487. = 17 years before Paul writes.
o Year 1050 from David's
Hebron Kingship is 4146 FAF. Temple Foundation Year: 1000.
Exodus
Year: 1480. Flood Year: 2490. = repayment owed Gentiles.
o Lord age 43, 4146 FAF. 54 years to Millennium (2100-2046,
Abraham).
Temple
Year: 990, 546.
Exodus
Year: 1480. Flood Year: 2490. = 14 years before Paul writes.
o Lord age 50, 1050 from United, 1057 from Hebron Kingship = 4153 FAF. Temple
Year: 997, 553.
Exodus
Year: 1487. Flood Year: 2497.
o Lord age 53, Year 1053 from United, 1060 from Hebron Kingship, 4156 FAF. Temple Year: 1000, 556.
Exodus
Year: 1490. Flood Year: 2500.
o Paul writes near Lord's 56th birthday = 57th year,
end 4159 FAF.
Temple
Year: 1003, 559.
Exodus
Year: 1493. Flood Year: 2503. = 40 years before Mill starts.
o Lord age 70,
2nd Temple DIES. Year 1070 United, 1077 Hebron = 4173 FAF. Temple Year: 1017,
573.
Exodus
Year: 1507. Flood Year: 2517. = 14 years after Paul writes.
o Lord age 73 and David 1110 = 4176 FAF, 2000
years after Joseph's enslaved. Temple Year: 1020, 576.
Exodus
Year: 1510. Flood Year: 2520. = 17 years after Paul writes.
o Lord age 77 = Year 1077 from David's
United Kingship = 4180 FAF.
Temple
Year: 1024, 580.
Exodus
Year: 1514. Flood Year: 2524. = 21 years after Paul writes.
o Lord age 90, Year 1050 from David's death = 4193 FAF. Temple Year: 1037,
593.
Exodus
Year: 1527. Flood Year: 2537. = Trib Start, pre-Church.
o Lord age 93 =
end 4197 FAF = 2154 from
Abraham, Dan 9:27.Temple (Foundation)
Year: 1040 (1050).
Exodus
Year: 1530. Flood Year: 2540. Temple was to die, mid-4197.
o Lord's age 97, Year 1057 from David's death is 4200 FAF. Temple Year: 1044,
600.
Exodus
Year: 1534. Flood Year: 2544. = 40 years after
Paul writes.
o Millennium to start end year 4200 FAF.
Temple Foundation Year: 1054.
Exodus
Year: 1534. Flood Year: 2544. = 40 years after
Paul writes.
o Paul adds 7 to get 4207
FAF = 2100 from Jacob's birth, 3150
from Noah's. Temple Year: 1050
(end).
Exodus
Year: 1540 (end). Flood Year: 2550 (end).
o Year 1167 from
David's birth and Lord's Age 130, 4233 FAF. Temple
Year: 1077, 643.
Exodus
Year: 1567. Flood Year: 2577.
o Millennium
ends Year 5250 FAF.
Temple
Year: 2094,1660.
Exodus
Year: 2584. Flood Year: 3594.
o Maybe Paul adds 7 to get 5257 FAF.
Temple
Year: 2100. (end) Exodus Year: 2590. (end) Flood
Year: 3600. (end)
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, continued
Bible Time Distance
Table (Old, simpler
version here.)
|
Adam |
Noah |
Flood |
Abraham age
100 |
Exodus |
David Birth |
David King Heb. |
David King Jeru |
David Death |
Temple Dedicated |
Temple Dies |
Chanukah |
Christ Birth |
Christ Death |
Jubilee + Trib |
Millen nium |
Comments |
Adam |
0 |
1056 |
1655-56 |
2046 |
2666 |
3066 |
3096 |
3103 |
3143 |
3156 |
3520 |
3942 |
4103 |
4136 |
4144 |
4200 |
Year 1=Year 0 until mid-year. So you must often add or subtract
1, from time differences. |
Noah |
1056 |
0 |
600 -1 |
990 |
1610-1 |
2010 |
2040 |
2047 |
2087 |
2100 |
2464 |
2886 |
3047 |
3080 |
3087 |
3144 |
Noah born on what would be Passover. |
Flood |
1655-6 |
600 |
0 |
390 |
1010-1 |
1410 |
1440 |
1447 |
1487 |
1500 |
1864 |
2286 |
2447 |
2480 |
2487 |
2544 |
Flood starts and ends on Pentecost; Flood calendar based on Ethanim start. |
Abraham |
2046 |
990 |
390 |
0 |
620 |
1020 |
1050 |
1057 |
1097 |
1110 |
1474 |
1896 |
2057 |
2090 |
2097 |
2154 |
Time to End Messiah was 2100 from Abraham's age
100. So 54 more years 'payback' due
Gentiles. |
Exodus |
2666 |
1610 |
1010 |
620 |
0 |
400 |
430 |
437 |
477 |
490 |
854 |
1276 |
1437 |
1470 |
1477 |
1534 |
1470 = 490 x 3.
To the DAY. |
David Birth |
3066 |
2010 |
1410 |
1020 |
400 |
0 |
30 |
37 |
77 |
90 |
454 |
876 |
1037 |
1070 |
1077 |
1134 |
David likely born last quarter of sacred year. |
David King Hebron |
3096 |
2040 |
1440 |
1050 |
430 |
30 |
0 |
7 |
47 |
60 |
424 |
846 |
1007 |
1040 |
1047 |
1104 |
Christ dies 10 years short. Paul balances that fact to the green shaded
numbers, via the 78
sevens. |
David King Jeru |
3103 |
2047 |
1447 |
1057 |
437 |
37 |
7 |
0 |
40 |
53 |
417 |
839 |
1000 |
1033 |
1040 |
1097 |
David crowned no later than 25 Chislev. |
David Death |
3143 |
2087 |
1487 |
1097 |
477 |
77 |
47 |
40 |
0 |
13 |
377 |
799 |
960 |
993 |
1000 |
1057 |
Temple construction began 3.5 years after he
died, 1Kings 6:1, LXX. |
Temple Dedic. |
3156 |
2100 |
1500 |
1110 |
490 |
90 |
60 |
53 |
13 |
0 |
364 |
786 |
947 |
980 |
987 |
1044 |
Dedicated in Ethanim, 1Kings 8:1 |
Temple Dies |
3520 |
2464 |
1864 |
1474 |
854 |
454 |
424 |
417 |
377 |
364 |
0 |
422 |
583 |
616 |
623 |
680 |
Temple dies late August, twice. |
Chanu kah |
3942 |
2886 |
2286 |
1896 |
1276 |
876 |
846 |
839 |
799 |
786 |
422 |
0 |
160 |
193 |
200 |
257 |
Lord born on Chanukah, 9th month. |
Christ Birth |
4103 |
3047 |
2447 |
2057 |
1437 |
1037 |
1007 |
1000 |
960 |
947 |
583 |
160 |
0 |
33 |
40 |
97 |
97th birthday begins His 98th year. |
Christ Death |
4136 |
3080 |
2480 |
2090 |
1470 |
1070 |
1040 |
1033 |
993 |
980 |
616 |
193 |
33 |
0 |
7 |
64 |
980 = 490 x 2. |
Jubilee +Trib |
4143 |
3087 |
2487 |
2097 |
1477 |
1077 |
1047 |
1040 |
1000 |
987 |
623 |
200 |
40 |
7 |
0 |
57 |
57, when you count from beginning of the first
year, to the end of the last year. |
Millen-nium |
4200 |
3144 |
2544 |
2154 |
1534 |
1134 |
1104 |
1097 |
1057 |
1044 |
680 |
257 |
97 |
64 |
57 |
0 |
Mill really starts on the first day of 4201. |
Meter
Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, continued
o Paul also uses 1050, to severally balance from Abraham. We saw 3096, David's
Hebron Kingship, was 1050 from Abraham's maturation. That's no
coincidence, either. Israel was
allotted her own 2100 due TO Abraham, so look: 1077 x 2 = 2154, reflects Abraham's birth as well as age 100 maturation, resulting in a 54-year 'refund' due the Gentiles.
Cute. Christ dies 2090 after Abraham's
maturation, so a net shortfall of 64, which is 7 years short of the 57th year pre-Millennium, He was supposed to die. So 10 years short of 2100 from Abraham's maturation, too. 3096 + 2154 = 5250. That 10
years, is really a net number, product of:
o 14 years' overtime = the 7-year civil
war + David living 7 more years to offset it.
So 54 + 14 = 68. But he ruled in Hebron 7.5
years, 1Chron3:4. Count backwards.
o 13.5 years' net overtime again, years from his death and Temple dedication: 68
+ 13.5 = 81.5. Again,
count backwards. Temple 7.5 years, 1st 6 months on stones, 1Kings 5 and LXX
1Kings 6:1, began (2?) Ziv 960 bc,
ends Bul 7.5 years later, 953 (1Kings 6:37-8, 2Chron3:1-2). Meanwhile, Solomon finishes
other building, total of 20 years, 1Kings 7:1. Temple Dedication is 3 years after construction, begins new
490, as the Exodus 490 runs out -- 1 or 2 Ethanim 950 bc, 1Kings 8:1. (bc dates not adjusted for Paul.)
o 21 years' overtime, for Second
Temple. Daniel prayed near Nisan 538 bc,
start of Darius via Cyrus, 1st regnal year, Dan 9:1. Jews returned, and are
assembled enough to celebrate Rosh HaShanah, still 538; next 18 months pass, so 537 ends; then,
Temple founded Ziv 536 bc, Ezra
3:8 vs. 3:1. They finish 3 Adar 516,
Ezra 6:15.
o So Daniel 9, prayed at start of 49th sacred year; 2 years
later takes you to start of 51st sacred year. So Ziv 536 bc
to 24 Chislev on foundation, Haggai 2; construction restarts 24 Chislev 522 or
very soon after. So 21 years, seven directly on Temple (7 or 8 months spent on foundation, +2 months after 25 Chislev 516). So 81.5 + 21 = 102.5.
o God made up this time (14+13.5+21) with the 49 missed
sabbatical years, thus 'repaying' the Gentiles via Israel being in
Diaspora.
o
So 102.5
- 49 = 53.5 So net,
Gentiles are owed the same 54 years due to Abraham, as before. Balances. (Abraham and Noah's year started on
what we call Rosh HaShanah. Noah's
maturation, occurred near what we call Passover, as that was his birthday. Hence the 6-month difference.)
o Note that distinction. The 49 missed sabbatical years were spent as time belonging to Israel, but were wrongly used; so
that gave rise to the hanging-chad seven more sabbatical years due on
the elapsed 49; which couldn't
play pre-Messiah, giving rise to the second 'seven' which is the 62nd week
in Daniel. Scholars miss this, since
they errantly deem Bible years lunar, though Exodus 12 mandated solar, so
Israel would never miss her birthday.
o But that 49, Israel is in Diaspora. So it's a credit to the Gentiles. 21 years were next spent,
rebuilding the Temple; she was back in the Land, completing the 70. So God reimbursed Gentiles for that 21 years in advance. Ergo, Isaiah 53 is 462 syllables = the hanging chad 7 + 21 Temple rebuilding
years.
o So 28 becomes 10, also balancing to Abraham. David died, then 13.5 1st Temple delay, +1 year 2nd Temple delay (one
year back in Land AFTER the year 49 had elapsed from Daniel's prayer): 28
- 14.5 = 13.5. Christ is
born based on David's age and kingship, so now 13.5 - 3.5 = 10.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, continued
o Mid-point here, is end of 4173, 14 years after
Paul writes. At the Lord's human age 70, same as when David
retired. That 4173 = David's Hebron Kingship year 1077, United Kingship Year 1070, when
David would have been 1077+30=1107 years old; Abraham would have been 2127 years
MATURE. And another 27 years from 4173, completes the Millennial allotment, the huio of huiothesian in Ephesians 1:5 (they didn't write iota subscripts, in those days). Yeah, mirroring To the Son. Cute.
o Temple Down, here at 4173, really starting 4174; we now know that's Passover to
9th Av, Titus' final assault. Paul's wry
syllable 70 = hagious.
o Note the 10-year cutoff, balancing again to Abraham. 4173 - 40 = 4143 when the Lord should have died, 1000th anniversary of David's death.
Mirror.
o 4143 - 2046 = 2097, which is 3.5 short of the 2100 due to Abraham's supermaturation. Hence the Trib is split into 3.5 pieces; with
the 54, becoming 57.
o He actually died 7 years prior, year 2090 from Abraham's maturation. So 10 years short of the total 2100 allotment. So to balance, 10
years is chopped off from the previous 50 years for Harvesting the Gentiles,
since now that period begins seven years early. Again, to balance to
Abraham. For the other 3.5 years,
finishes the Tribulation.
o Israel was 40 years' late getting into the Land. Had she been on time, Temple would
started 40 years earlier. The Land is
'shorted' 40 years, so here the 40 extra years Temple stands during Church,
repays that shortage. Also, her TWO
SEVENS from Daniel 9:26 and 27, are yet future.
So only the 40, is 'paid'. Total?
54, still balancing to Abraham. Temple
year 1000 is also 4146 from Adam, 54 years
o 4173 is Temple Year 1017 measured from 1st Temple, as we saw here. It was supposed to last until mid-4197, 54 years after He was supposed to die. So it was supposed to be 'age' 1040 at
death. Just as the Lord was supposed to
be age 40 in the 1040th anniversary of David's United Kingship (4143), and then
die. Mirror.
o But again, just as 28 became 10, Temple dies in its Year
1017, since it represents Christ: so Temple dies 23 years younger than it
should be.
o Mirror: Paul
writes end 4159, 23 years after the Lord's death, 14 years before the Temple will die, net of
what? 10.
o Again, balancing to Abraham: 4196 - 2046 = 2150 -
13.5 - 10 = 2126.5 + 2046 = 4172.5. Temple's anniversary is six months later.
o A correct formula will balance in more
than one way; we see Paul use
diverse balancing formulas to tie both to past and future prophecy, as well as
to real history then and later known. So all this number-crunching STILL isn't
enough. Paul hubs back-and-forward in
Time, more than I show. Yet at least
you've an idea, what he's doing.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, BC/AD
conversion
So
now we detour into how Adamic years 'fit' our own calendars. The answer is so simple, you'll die: Paul uses Roman accounting. We call it Anno Domini,
but that's just another version of years from a king -- here, King of the Jews
and King of Kings. Regnal years are like
birthdays. So first king of the world,
Adam: his age, is Bible's base accounting.
No bc, ad or auc.
Both Roman and our bc/ad
calendars have 3-year padding or subtractions.
Ironically, their calendar errors offset each other. So how do we match Adam's age to the NAME
of the years we use, to convert Bible's years, into 'ours'? Let's see.
(Click here to skip over this subsection.)
1. Rome's founding year
was GUESSED. Its own calendar has
a very tangled past. Scholars have
no end of trouble reconciling it. Romans were superstitious about numbers; sometimes they just removed unlucky days.
Weeks were 8 days, months in a 'year' were 10 or sometimes 12; sometimes
the month name, didn't correspond to the same month name every year; they used a 377 or 378 or 356 or 364 or 358
-day 'year'; or, lunar; not only that,
but priests of Rome set the definition of 'year' in any year. Worse, years
were defined by consul names. What a
nightmare. Pre-45
BC, their calendar at times started in September, versus Jewish March 21 or
so. Or, sometimes with January. December ended the year even when it didn't
end the year. Under Julius Caesar, this
horror got standardized to a solar year; but when they created the fix, they
guessed and made many unknown corrections, to the past. They were not
consistent. Romans debated the results.
Good historians like
Polybius more properly chopped off four
years from the Roman auc
that Varro invented. In Augustus' and
Claudius' time, Varro's gap & guess
became law: Rome was deemed born in what we now call 753 bc. Claudius
celebrated Rome's 800th year in 47 AD, which means 753 = beginning of year
47. So 753+47=800. So the problem with reconciling to Bible,
isn't Bible's fault: but rather, the fault of these screwball old
calendars. And there's no zero, since a
new year 1 begins after the old
ending.
2. Some accounting basics: 1+1 counts BOTH numbers as
wholes. Same, when you subtract. But a year is zero at its beginning, and 1
at its end. So you must know how many months in both year 'x', and
'x+1'. Your 30th birthday, is a
whole; 30th anniversary of your birth at age 0;
you are '30 years old'; 30 years have elapsed. But you've also started your 31st
year. You are in your 31st year until
your 31st birthday. So in 'year 31', you
attain age 31. So were you
crowned early or late age 0, it's still year
one of rule; its anniversary 30
years later, is your 31st year. But
you've only ruled for 30. Also, if
reconciling to a calendar, the number of months in 'year' x, might be
different.
3. Augustus dates his reign at Battle of Actium,
September 2, 723 auc = 31 bc = 753-30, at end
of calendar year; but birthday
of his new reign = year one. So:
753-723= 30th 'age' = anniversary of Augustus' victory, at end. But 31st year of his reign all year, if he counted his victory year as 'one', to align with the Jan-Dec (Julian)
calendar.
4. Compounding this problem: year 753 is
called 1 bc, by historians. So 1AD =754.
So start of 14 AD is 753 + 14 = 767 auc. It's not Augustus' 44th
anniversary, until September. He died
in August, just before his 77th birthday that September, so historians count his rule as 44 years. But maybe he called that his
45th regnal year. Olde
English reconciliation chart. Reconcile start vs. end of year. Allow a variance of +1 or -1. And,
if a partial year is counted as '1', maybe add another '1' .
5. Next problem: Catholics
chopped off 4 years from Augustus, and made 754 = 1AD. Thus we get a disparity of 30
versus 33 AD for Christ. 3-year
difference, since He's born at the end of the year. Catholic error cancels Roman four-year
overstatement of the auc; the 4-year problem remains. Rome is likely
four years younger. Bible uses the
years-from accounting, so auc
total's value, doesn't matter. Neither
does the Catholic error. Just
reconcile to Adam, and you'll be okay.
6. God knows we can't add or subtract. So Bible communicates with dates people use. Doesn't mean God agrees with
those dates. In accounting, you balance
between diverse number systems, to 'translate' them. So '2nd year of Darius', is what Darius
called his second year. So you use
it. Same here, for Rome. The NT was written to folks under Rome; hence two Time Accountings are used in
NT: Bible's own, and Roman.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary: BC/AD
conversion, continued
7. Luke 3:1 says 15th year of
Tiberius: Roman accounting. So, LATE in what we today call 29 ad aka 782 auc. Tiberius attains his 15th anniversary of rule, that year. It's straightforward. He's soon to be 30, so it's late fall or
winter. So
you count BACKWARDS 15, then 15 more, to get to His Birth. Couldn't be simpler.
a.
Augustus died 'our' August
19, 14 ad, Suetonius para. 100
on Augustus. Paul wryly tracked to this
as I showed in the GGS 11 videos, with Augustus dying at kuriou, 14th
syllable: when Augustus is deified. Cute. So Paul tallies to Christ's age
14. Tracks the eudokian thele syllables for Trajan, Macrinus,
Diocletian who each adopted an heir, then died at that syllable. Here, Christ will be age 15, by December, as
you'll see below. For Bible uses
last-birthday accounting.
b.
So the beginning, is year one of
Tiberius. Think of year one as the
year which becomes 1, by its end. Same idea, for any
year numbered from 1+. The Emperors
typically didn't piggyback their year one
on the last year of a prior emperor. But
there are exceptions, and co-regencies.
Here, it's net of co-regency
with Augustus.
c.
So a new year one can be piggybacked on old year
x or a zero. So
you need to know what old year, the '1' begins.
d.
In those days, the Roman
calendar year stably began on 1 January. Augustus died in August, only four months
prior.
e.
If Tiberius used September for his own
regnal birthday, as some rulers did -- the 'new' year is still the same year one, beginning two weeks after Augustus died.
f.
So Tiberius' Year 15 = late 29 AD in 'our' terms, in all cases. Simple.
Just a question of how late in year 15.
And we know how late it was, given what comes next.
g.
Jesus
was nearly 30 that year, Luke 3:23. So we know 'year 15', is before Chislev. Very near it. So Tiberius uses September prior, or
January current, as his regnal 'birthday'.
So his 15th year either started in September, and Luke 3:23 is soon
after, for Chislev is in Roman December -- or Tiberius is near the end of his 15th
year, even as Christ is near the end of His age 29, in His 30th
year, near His 30th birthday. God's Word loves accounting equidistance: so bet on both being near end-year.
h.
Equidistance: count back 15 more: you get 29th anniversary,
but 30th year of Augustus.
i.
Chanukah
occurred at
the end of that Roman year.
So 753 = 1 bc,
begins Augustus' year 30, Christ's
year one. When He's age 0.
So
think of '1 bc' as 'Birth of Christ'.
j.
The
Lord is Age One STARTING One AD, even per Paul's
meter:
End 752, He's Born
for you;
At Chanukah's
start, in Bread Town, too.
End 753 Roman auc;
He's turned Age
One, when that year is done!
So 752 is bc 2, and 753 is 1 bc.
Rome's founding
year bc, now His:
and now you know,
when His Birthday is.
So 754 is 1 ad: Age One all year, 'til Christmas
cheer.
End 7 8 6, He's age thirty-three, at the close of
thirty-two ad.
Three months later,
He dies for sins: thirty-three ad, Passover. Wins.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, BC/AD
conversion, continued
k.
So in 29 ad when Luke writes, the Lord is nearly
at His 30th birthday, as Luke says. Our 'ad'
equals His AGE, same as God's pan-Bible, last-birthday accounting.
m.
So
we know Bible adjusts to Roman time, in its reporting. Doesn't matter, the Romans
misdate Rome's founding. Bible names the
persons and their regnal years, so that's when He was born; balances to the
calculations we use today. So now you
know how to read the OT, too. Bible will
'translate' into the rulers' conventions.
n.
So it also doesn't matter that
the Catholic adjustment, in essence deletes three-four years. The year itself,
is the same: only its name, changed.
Luke 3:1 and 23, when Christ was nearly 30; yeah, He has to be tempted first, before
He can announce Himself in Luke 4:16 at age 30, same as David crowned in
Hebron.
o.
So we maybe know something
else: it was likely soon after
Booths aka Sukkoth, that He went to fast and be tested. In time for, His Birthday announcement.
p.
So Paul is consistent. He writes after the Roman auc=753 was made law, so
dates year
one of Christ, as the START
of 753 auc, just as Claudius did back in 47, when inaugurating the Games. For Christ is born at the very end of the
Roman year 752 auc. No wonder Paul's meter ties to 'our' ad years of Roman history.
q.
So
now the Adamic conversion. Year 4103 from Adam is His Birth Year. David was probably crowned late in 3103, for Christ was born Kislev (9th month) 4103.
Scholars
mess up Christ's birth: they heed Josephus, deem David's death, age
70: so they misread (or ignore) 1Kings 2:11-39, 6:1, 37-38, 1Chron 3:4, 2Chron
3:2. So they ineptly claim Christ born (4000 or) 4100 years
after Adam, net of the offsetting Catholic error. But He was born (net) 3 years later. Worse, they misaccount Bible's years as lunar,
so they also misread Daniel 9:26; so
they don't see their 7-year
error (490 lunar = 483 solar). To adjust, they ineptly set bc backwards 3 years, or ad forward 3 years: neither method
works! Good thing we have Bible's own
words and meter, to straighten us out!
r.
So
treat Roman Year 753 = 4103. So
HIS AGE is reflected by 4104 = 754 = 'our' 1 ad. So 4133, He's age 30. Per historians, that's 29AD which Bible calls
Tiberius' 15th year. So now subtract 30,
and you get 'their' 1 bc aka 753,
as the year containing His first birthday.
s.
Difference
is 4103 - 753 = 3350. So Christ should have died 793 auc -- really, start of 794, as 14 Nisan is 1st month Jewish, (end) 3rd
month Roman; and Millennium should
have occurred 850 auc (really 851,
first day of it). But He died in 786 auc (start of 787). Now you know why Paul's accounting, tracks so
well to Roman time.
8.
Next,
on Quirinius, Luke 2:2. Greek verb hegemoneuw means to have an
authority to rule, a command, or a rank of command. The only records we have of him being
governor of Syria, allegedly, are from 6/7 ce. So of course we automatically deem the Bible
wrong? Quirinius was a roving emissary for Augustus. We don't have all the Roman records of his
travels and functions. So if he had a special
authority to collect taxes, he
would be 'governor', alright, but with a special charge. It's a rank.
That rank can be for special or general purposes. For special, he still must be granted the same rank to have the requisite
authority, even if only temporary or for a special purpose. And it would be a special purpose to
institute a new taxation system, which thereafter the regular governor can
handle. Greek verb is general, but Luke specifies a purpose. English 'while' isn't in the Greek. He obviously denotes a one-time event:
inauguration of the first Judaean census, under Roman administration.
o Luke does not state any year of office; he'd have
to say what year of governorship
it was, if Quirinius
had the office of governor, rather
than a special task. Else you wouldn't know what year, even if you knew the
name of the governor. Luke had to
say what year of Tiberius, as his was
a term of office. But Luke doesn't mention any term of office
for Quirinius. Instead, he just notes the function
of starting the census. So we know it was a rank, not an 'office' of
governor.
o Augustus changed the tax law in 27 bc to a head tax. It
was a major change, the Senate fought him;
it went into effect for the provinces, circa 12 bc or so. Just Google on 'Augustan
tax reform', and pick whatever sites you like (UNRV and Cato are helpful; also Perez pdf, p.2 of
search). 10 years later, is 2 bc.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, BC/AD
conversion, continued
o However, in Judaea,
Herod personally
administered Roman taxes until he died. Some years he paid the taxes personally, instead
of wholly taxing the Jews. This was
done to keep peace. Again, you can find
many sites on this, and even documentaries on Herod from the History Channel, ISBE
Encyclopedia, etc.
o So we won't find ROMAN records of this first census, since HEROD handled it. Herod is dying in what we call '4 bc' = 1 bc. So if Augustus designated Quirinius as
'governor' for that special function of collecting a head tax already handled by the Jewish system as part of Temple tax collection; since dying Herod wanted Augustus to
administer his own will; then it's a special kind of 'governorship'. Augustus
has a trustee function with respect to the will of
Herod; so this isn't a normal SPQR operation. Same rank needed, but special
function of behalf of the imperium.
Would be the first Roman census all the same, as Herod was
dying. Would be in Jewish not Roman
records, as Herod managed
Roman tax collection via Jews i.e., Matthew the tax collector. Even logic, would tell you that.
o If Quirinius
was to collect the Jewish tax, why not collect it for the whole region that year? He'd already
be in the area, since he was rector to Gaius, who was
then in Syria to head off Phraates V's rebellion. Aha, many
troops to protect the money, honey.
Handy justification for Quirinius'
rank, to do a job of private imperial trusteeship. All the 'governors' involved,
would love to save expense/hassle of transport, too. Here they get a respected Imperial emissary
who is so trusted, he cares for Augustus' own family! Whew.
And of course being so trusted, Quirinius can act as eyes and ears,
someone outside the system. Auditing
it. Ooops.
o Rather, now we better value why Luke wrote as he
did: he distinguishes between the FIRST
census, and the one in 6 ce which
caused the uproar. For the next
time Quirinius does it, he HAS the office of governor (Bible loves wordplay) -- when
Judaea became a province in 6 ce
-- they revolted.
o That second census, is its own first: for in 6 ce,
the Romans
no longer use the Jewish system; Judaea became a province as a result of Herod's will and Augustus' ruling on it; due to fights over Archelaus. Surely Quirinius was used, as he was familiar
to the Jews, 7 years later. See, Luke
is tying cause and result, by wordplay. That's a frequent rhetorical style, in Bible,
to link two related events with wordplay.
Here, same guy as before.
Two firsts: first due to Herod dying,
then a new first provincial status,
as a result of Herod dying. Luke's
readers would smile at the connection.
Luke is very fond of finessed understatement.
9.
Historians
also use Herod's death year; they use
astronomy, to date it. So we must go through
that, next. We know from Bible
that Christ's birth is only three months prior to Herod's death (Chanukah to
Passover). Roman
historians use eclipses to date Herod's death. But there are eclipses every year. So pick
the wrong one, and you get the wrong year.
Whether the right 'eclipse' should be visible from Rome or Jerusalem, is
another factor. Scholars guess at this
stuff. So their estimates can be
wrong. Yet even eclipses they use, still
balance to Christ's birthdate. Choose
the eclipse of Jan 1 BC or March 4 BC for Herod, and we still balance.
Why do we still
balance? Paul might be correcting the
Roman auc. Everyone Paul wrote, knew Varro
cobbled an estimated 35 regnal years per 'king'. Augustus made that fashionable, and Claudius
made it law. God foreknew 'our' 4 bc remains based on it, and what
problems we'd have reconciling to Bible, as a result.
4 bc should also be 1 bc, as Christ is born 3 years later
than scholars account, due to David's
SEVEN years' later death. The Catholic error cut four years from
Augustus' reign, so masks error amount;
as scholars insist on misreading Bible's Exodus 12 command of solar
years, and instead treat years as lunar in Daniel 9:26, they don't see how that
verse exposes their seven-year discrepancy. So for centuries we've wasted millions of
dollars, wrangling over His Birth year.
All due to laziness.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, BC/AD
conversion, continued
Josephus' account of Herod's Temple has a 3-year
accounting variance that might undo 'proof' by contenders of a 4 bc eclipse, based on a 20 bc construction start. Or, just
its announcement. So if Josephus
dates from when Herod conquered Jerusalem 37 bc,
construction began 16 bc. John 2:20's '46 years' tallies to Luke 2:23,
at 30 ad.
[Eclipse-dating
follows the Roman AUC system. He was
born 3 months before Herod died. Key
here is Mosaic law re the 40 days' purification AT TEMPLE, Luke 2:39, Leviticus
12. Next key, Herod's killing infants up
to two years old: mothers stopped
nursing, at the baby's age two;
eliminates guesswork, to just kill all sucklings. Next, Bible text of Matthew and Luke imply NO
long delay between Birth and Herod's death;
text is short, staccato, go to Bethlehem, return to Nazareth after at
least 40 days of purification from Chanukah (which ran 8 days), and 6 days'
travel back -- then the magi arrive in Nazareth -- oikia, Matt 2:11, not
phatne, Luke 2:7; that same
night, Joseph leaves for Egypt, so the magi were tracked by Herod's spies,
Matt2:16. Note Joseph has gold from the
magi. Greek paidion is used for
any child except a newborn. So Matthew
2:9, 13, 14, 16 use paidion -- verse 16, all males BELOW 2 years
old. It's also a term of endearment. So Christ is maybe 60 days old when they left
for Egypt = end Shebat. Bible says
nothing more, so they didn't stay long.
Would have taken 15-30 days' travel.
Herod lives another month (Adar); then Augustus audits Herod's will,
which is violently contested. Say
another six months.]
10. Christ is born 4103 from Adam. That's real. We
provably misread Bible's years. That's real, too. Yet we've seen how His Death is balanced to
Abraham's too-early maturation, in the Mosaic Law; and, to other major dates in
the Bible Time Distance Table, which only derive from Bible. Noah's predecessors are all accounted,
there. Just add siring ages. After Jacob, Bible lists time based on other
events: Joseph's age when kidnapped, Jacob's age on entering Egypt, etc. So, you use those. Occasionally, God balances back to a birth,
especially David's in 1Kings 6:1, so we misread it -- and, to Christ. Whose witty Birthday prophecy no one
recognizes, in Haggai 2. But Luke and
Matthew's wordplay show Chanukah plainly enough. Greek wordplay on Adar in Luke 1:36 compared
with verse 26 is plain. So too, Lights,
shepherds seeing angels but no one else did;
the Family's guardian angel playing 'star' to moonstruck-magi and moderns,
yet no one in Jerusalem saw it, Matt
2:3 -- while the
Family roomed in Bethlehem then Jerusalem, during Mary's post-partum
purification; then to Nazareth = Chanukah = 'dedicated'. As in, Feast of Lights, Dedication.
11. So our bc/ad snafu reflects a real snafu in TIME,
the 3.5 year lag between David's death and Temple start. We
deemed David dead at 70, added 3.5 years, so are short the other 3.5, to balance to Christ: Who was born 3.5
years later than that, due to David's seven
years later death, to die within allotted TEMPLE time. In GeneYrs.xls, I plotted out how
Temple Time was based on David's 490-year time grants. Each grant ran out, 1 - 3 years later. So Temple would lose protection,
had it not been rebuilt in time. We
don't notice that connection, as our
3.5-year errors offset: so we often end up with the
right bc and ad dates. So our David's
Death error, persists:
·
4-year overstatement of Roman auc, re its total age; maybe due in
part to fake consuls plugged in, during the 300's BC. Or other reasons.
·
Another four-year error, this one Catholic, debiting
Augustus' own time. Offset.
·
Others are due to ambiguities over measuring
regnal-year start points, or similar conundra, like
·
do you measure Tiberius 15th year including or excluding his co-regency? Difference? 3-4!
Offsetting!
·
Then, the eclipse thingy: 3-4 years there, too. Again, offsetting.
·
Or, when Herod really began building the Temple:
measured from two different regnal periods, and the difference? 3-4 years!
Offsetting!
·
Our scholars mistaking David's death age by what? 3-4 years, net of offset with the 3.5 year
hiatus, in 1Kings 6:1!
·
Temple
construction's total 7.5 year period which suddenly becomes 10
-- is it esconced within the interim between David's death, so is upfront, and
what about it beginning in Ziv, but ending in Bul? Measured from what? Difference?
3.5 years, from David's death, in either
direction.
·
Chanukah is three years after the Temple desecration which we call 167, so
Chanukah is 164, each in our 'bc'.
·
Daniel
9:26's 483 years, are not
lunar. So its extra seven years, is ignored. Yet that too, is offset by the seven year cut
they make in David's age at death, which in turn is offset by the usual credit
they add for deeming his rule at 1000 bc. So we still get to the right birth year,
either 4 bc
or 1 bc?
Difference...
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: eudokian+epainon 78 sevens Time Balance Summary, BC/AD
conversion, continued
Isn't that recurring 3.5 year anomaly amazing? Yeah, and maybe it warns us, we don't
reconcile correctly. Worse, we don't
account time backwards from endpoints, though Bible always does -- Luke 3:23
for example, requires you to calculate BACKWARDS. So we make more errors. Numbers bore us. So we allow errors to
repeat, and don't Return To The Source,
Scripture. So we continue the inane
Ussher chronology, now a lie 1500 years old, retold daily. Since we want simple answers. Because we accept Dear Dr. So and So's
'respectable' calculation of the past, however honestly or dishonestly WRONG it
was. Because we won't admit error. Etc.
12. In any event, the Lord
was to die the 1000th year of David's death, 4143
from Adam. Paul
accounts to match Roman time, as that's what people used: 752 auc = Christ's birth, end of that
year. So Paul writes in 56 based on that accounting; maybe
his letter wasn't delivered by Tychicus until 58-59, so perhaps we mistake where Paul was, when he
wrote. The postscript re Tychicus, could
have been added later, when sending the circular letter. The audience getting the letter, would know
if it was written two years prior. The
meter is plain enough. Or, maybe it was
currently delivered in 56, and Paul wrote while in jail, still in
Palestine. He was treated well, not yet
tried. He had rights.
We call that year 58-59, which also reflects the
offsetting errors which continue to dog us.
Our accountings go back and forth between Bible's years, and the
Roman. So are not consistent. So sometimes the dates are right, and
sometimes wrong. The Roman accounting
doesn't include the three year cutoff of David's age. But as you've seen, it has its own error
problems. So when someone says '58'
based on the Roman accounting, you'll have a one or even two (for rounding)
variance, versus Paul. When the error is
compounded by using the Roman calendar in conjunction with Bible years, people
will just adjust back or forward to what they think right; sometimes the error cancels out the error
made with respect to David, and sometimes not.
And we never fix it by going back to the Bible, but instead just repeat
the same old information based on hearsay.
It's a nightmare. But then, we
never fix the lie of Good Friday, either.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul
'mates' the anaphora to History:
Parallel Temple Trio Time Balance Summary
Temple
Trio means God Rescues History Via Individual Believers
Who Vote For Bible. Especially, amidst
Apostasy.
o From proetheto to prothesin, 301-231 = 70 syllables. Voting. Bad votes by believers, caused Diocletian. Moldy display 'bread' for
Christ.
o From prothesin to proelpikotas, 343-301, 42 syllables. Generation Building. God uses Persecution and Diaspora under Diocletian and then Constantine, to enable Generation Building Outside Corrupt Roman Empire. Hence Rome herself, shrinks and breaks apart.
Sum is 112. Temple Trio
factors: 70 and 42, equal 56 x 2, as parallel; aka, 16 sevens. So the Trio historically parallels Isaiah 53, Daniel 9:11+12, and
25+26.
o
Isaiah
paired 70's, 42's, and 56's. The
latter, in Isaiah 53:1+2, 5+6, cover Manasseh and Temple Down, see 2Kings 24.
From Passover to Pentecost to 9th Av.
o
Daniel tracks Isaiah's chronology, so paired 58's (to stress lateness), Dan9:11+12 (on time of Manasseh, reason for Temple
Down). Missed the
holy appointments.
o
God paired 57's to show timeline of 2nd Temple Going Down, Dan 9:25+26. Time from Passover to 9th Av, counting the
days on which the holidays fall.
o
So Paul here equates paired 56's, thus 'talking back
to' all three passages. That means
Church will go down, too, aka Rapture. But by then, it will be complete, due to the proelpikotas being completed. So the day of
exit, is not counted. So 56, not
57. And no 58, since God Will Do It On Time. So Paul stops the meter at 434.
o Sum of all three anaphora: 94 sevens
= 658 - 16 overlap in eudokian = 586 (bc) +56. Balances
back to Daniel 9:4 and Isaiah 53:4, from year Paul writes. Paul picks up at Temple
Down, as Messiah's 'body' is Temple Built. So Paul prays for its building in Eph1:15-23; so Eph 2 is about Temple walls; so Eph 3 explains its 'mystery' -- hidden until Israel halted
construction -- so Church construction takes as long as it takes. Eph 4 says how: Church is built via BIBLE taught -- was that chapter in any prelate's Bible? Guess not. For 'church father' Gentile
Pharisees write pil-pul tomes on clothing, bathing, what HOUR do you fast?! But Eph 5 says BIBLE USED defeats Satan in Eph 1:10 Trial. BIBLE, not baby
behavior. Eph 6 Roman panoply, is but
chirped. So Paul prays Eph1:15-23, 3:15-19, since God just had him plot Church
Childish, Future!
o
Note
the overlap is subtracted, to balance back to Daniel and Isaiah. The subtraction means God Rectifies
Time. Overlap is from 215-231, in the eudokian anaphora. There were two imbalances: first, in eudokian anaphora, the Severan period: when civil war, mothers
and babies rule; for 'Mother Church' was invented by Irenaeus,
Tertullian, and above all Origen, who saw Church as utopia. Other imbalance was Constantinian period, overlapped in the epainon anaphora. It was offset by Paul
benching at 133, not
121, where the 1st epainon began. Net imbalance was +2, by end of the epainon. 1st epainon is only 12 syllables, but the 2nd's overlap = 14 (434-320).
So -2 in Flood-Duration tie, 133 - 334. Genesis 7-8, Days Flood remained pre-raven but post-rain = 203. Paul uses 201. Balances. So next he tied Noahic Genesis
entry/exit at 57+57, to Dan9:25+26. Balances 2nd epainon pair; also ties to Noah's
entry/exit, exactly. [+2 is also a BC/AD adjustment: Christ was born at end of Roman year.]
o So in Temple Trio,
Paul again mates Dan9:25+26. Another -2. Temple
Trio equates to 56+56, not 57+57. Why? Church begins and ends on JEWISH TIME. Rapture is both Crucifixion and Ascension
parallel. Jewish day begins at
sunset. One day short
entry/exit. Started on Pentecost. Exits on Rapture. Methu+selah: when she exits, it begins. Meaning? Church is the '56' of History. Individually.
Just as Daniel was, for Israel. This INDIVIDUAL meaning is so
vital, Paul tags Dan 9:25+26 three times: eudokian sum = Dan9:24-27; then 2nd epainon = Dan9:25+26; now Temple Trio, as both a 70 and a 42, which equals two 56's: thus Paul ties to those verses
in Isaiah 53, as well.
o
God
thus targets Constantine
as Revelation 17 Model Of Apostasy: meter links his years thrice to Flood Judgment, then to Manasseh, Temple Down, End of Time. Timing of Temple
Trio meter links his death year as failure to become proelpikotas, instead dying as merely proel. Flat condemnation of ecumenism
in any form.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd eudokian+3rd
epainon Appendix
II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: Parallel Time Balance Summary, continued
Three-anaphora-Doctrine
Summary: God Makes Church Balance Time.
Individually. He flat
condemns ecumenism; it caused Apostasy,
as it superimposes a group of 'elites' between God and you. The ultimate idolatry and fornication, is
religion. It substitutes self people
things, for relationship with God.
That's been Bible's theme since Genesis.
Religion comes in two flavors, ascetic and indulgent. Both substitute out relationship with God, in
favor of fitting in with people. Israel used its priesthood and rituals to
create an
intervening human power, thus violating the
Law. Church did the same thing. So Bible always shows that only individuals carry Time; for only One
Individual, paid for sins. So it's never a 'group' thing. Societies need
governing; but spiritual life is always and only Individual. So Paul traces that fact in three anaphora.
Mated them to Flood and Israel's past, to parallel then-future, Church
failure. Church will not go God's
Way. BE WARNED. Revelation then 'talks back to'
Ephesians, to show that apostasy. Thus
proving, the future warned against. Ends
with Rapture as Group Failure, but
Individual Success. Made by, the Holy
Spirit.
o First, via eudokian anaphora, Autonomy: How
God Rectifies Time, to Preserve Autonomy. Started at Trajan, when apostolic succession lie became popular; ended at Constantine, when that same lie became a government. Believe as I command, else you suffer. So God reduced the impact of that tyranny,
first by using 3rd century brawling-bishop fractiousness, to splinter Rome's
ruling spheres; then, He used persecution by Diocletian and the Constantines, to cut Rome up. So the eudokian anaphora ends at 320, when the toleration edicts were newly passed. exit
window, opened. Time to Flee. The
window will close, in 360's.
Paul thus parallels Bible
history: same past tyranny character of Time, to know what time it is,
'now'. So, he
balances first to Isaiah
53's 126, Manasseh and his
successors. Daniel stressed it, so Paul
ties to Daniel, too. Whole eudokian meter mates Daniel
9:24-27. Yep,
that bad. The 'kings' are church
leaders who sought to rule the world, instead of being ruled by God. Ironic, since each believer has a kingly
inheritance -- 'inherit the kingdom', in Galatians, inter alia -- if he
learns God, instead of the world. But the bishops, favor Caesar. So Paul maps the eudokian meter to Isaiah 53:3-10, to link the character of that time, to the character of Church
denouement. Paul then mates the meter sum,
to Daniel 9:24-27: to link timing of Church denouement, and to show god's judgment, of it.
o
Second,
the epainon anaphora shows God balances Time to Care For Bible. You can't praise Him without Word, Hebrews
11:6; so He makes sure you can always Get
Word. And if you refuse, you
perish. The bishops refused. They substituted petty rituals, gossip, made
up miracle lies, the works. Just read
the 'church fathers'.
o So, whole epainon meter = Daniel
9:14-19 = why
Jerusalem was razed (read here: Jerusalem II and Rome).
o Last epainon pair also piggybacks Dan9:25+26. Parallel: mene mene tekel
upharsin. Church And Her Self-Styled
Rulers, Belittle Bible. So God scatters Bible outside Rome, from Bar Kochba to Odovacer; decimating Jerusalem then
Rome, in the process. Enabling, exodus.
o For Lev 26, Deut 28 apply to Custodians of Word: so if Rome won't Care
for Bible, God won't Care for Rome.
o Flood time. Hence bald Noah tie on five
levels:
o
Daniel 9:14-19 and hence Paul's meter, triple-match
Days Noah was in the Ark: at 308, +7,
and +50. To play on 'Year' analogy, as
Noah's time is precedence.
o
Next, Paul made first epainon pair match post-rain,
pre-raven Flood Time.
o
Finally, Paul used the 2nd epainon pair to triple-match 57+57:
o
= Noah's entry/exit time.
o
= Passover to 9th Av judgment on 2nd Temple. = Flood of Troops in Dan
9:25-26. Which Paul metered
prophetically, 10-years-future. Thus it
occurred.
o
So 2nd epainon, spanning 320-434, is God's Negative Ruling Against Constantine: all his own progeny die next generation; then Rome itself breaks up, by the fourth
generation of successors. Rather blatant
show of Divine Disapproval. Strong
warning against imitation, huh.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix
I links: 1st eudokian
1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix I, How Paul 'mates' the anaphora to History: Parallel Time Balance Summary, continued
o
Then,
Paul severally balances to Adam, using sum of eudokian anaphora plus epainon, first to the old Millennial schedule; then
moved right on, Christ bought a new 490 -- during which some new proelpikotas must mature -- to buy the Rest of harvest time. Now a recurring 490 replaces the original 50-year Harvest-the-Gentiles,
allotment. Sudden death, if at least
one person, doesn't supermature.
o We know the first person was Paul, 2Tim4:7-8.
o It's a Time loop: we Church individually are always the
'56'
of History. If someone doesn't supermature to get that +490
each cycle, History ends.
o With Rapture. As a societal group we'll be ready, Ephesians 4:13. Meaning, mostly peons who didn't bother to
mature, in the time given. So we don't
get more time. Rapture happens when
believers ALL quit on Bible. How? Ecumenism.
Dark Ages II, only far worse. Pattern of
the first 434 years; at end, only Spirit
Votes; only the few, mature. Most Christians remain apostate throughout Church Age. So just as Rome, Jerusalem, the Jews and
apostate 'church' lost time, so will we.
o
So
now third, Temple Trio, how 490 individual supermaturation, works:
o Christ Set Before, like a meal. That's
proetheto.
o We 'eat' His thinking, so become Shewbread like Him. That's prothesin.
o A few mature earlier, so are the proelpikotas: Buying Time for the rest of the 'crop', To Grow. To Buy time for the whole world,
actually. Same since Adam.
o The historical parallel is to Noah, Isaiah and Daniel again, as in the
2nd epainon -- focusing on 56 or 57 or 58, don't be late like Manasseh!
o But oh, Church was late:
o
231-301, moldy bread vote;
o
301-343, moldy bakery generated,
o
so God generated the end of Constantine, and then Rome.
o So the epainon of the proelpikotas could complete Autonomy, and hence Bible
Care.
o Moral of verses 13-14, outcome of Temple Trio: Go
it Alone, as Christ Did. In His day, Jewish 'elders' corrupted
Judaism. In our day: Church 'elders'.
o
Thus
Paul fully accounts how Church Completes and Balances Time, Eph1:10's
theme. Both to Millennium, and to his
date of writing. FULL CIRCLE. The anaphora metrically tie to Millennial
accounting in 15-18 ways (severally and in aggregations). Perhaps the ones most relevant for us, are:
o 586+56 = 94 sevens -16. The -16 is the eudokian imbalance. Ties to Daniel and
Isaiah's use of 586bc, as we
saw. For Christ should have died at age
40, not 33.
o Next, subtract epainon imbalance of 14: so 56, becomes 42. = Paul's date of
writing: 4200 - 42 = 4158. For God gave Gentiles 2100; then, 2100 to the Jews. 2nd 2100 = age 98 (start) for Christ; for He was supposed to die at age 40, = King
as long as David; 57 years after that,
Millennium was to begin.
o Also unadjusted: 94 sevens = 98+490+70, which balances backwards to Adam and Christ's
Birth, then forward: new Time Grants,
for Church.
o Next, adjusted solely for epainon imbalance: 94 sevens = 658 x 7 = 4606 -14-434 =4158, the year Paul writes: as 56
years INTO the new 490.
o Full circle. Greek drama focused on a DAY. Unity
of time and place and space, Hebrew l'moed: all fed into and from, that
Day. While yet Today. Day of the Lord. Every day. So,
'day' with adjustments. He died 7
years early, 91AD. If no Rapture, a new 490 begins, + 70-year voting period,
same model ever since Adam fell. Now you
know why John wrote Revelation in 91 AD. Why he uses Aristotle's
Poetics to craft Revelation's Real and Future Time, as a quadrilogy, mix of
epic and tragedy: Play 1 = Rev 1-3,
Church; Play 2 = Rev 4-19, Trib; Play 3 = Rev 18-20, Mill; Play 4 = Rev21-22:5,
Eternity; Rev 22:6ff as moral/epilogue.
Keying off, Ephesians.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1
2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Appendix II: Reconciliation
Hypothesis for Diocletian's Death Date in 316
Modern
scholars debate Lactantius'
validity. So let's re-order the
facts given us, logically; then play 'what if'.
Tell me if you find any contra facts.
a.
In May 311, Galerius
dies. Dynastic alliances now are
mission-critical. Galerius was
maybe age 61 when he died. Was married
to Diocletian's daughter Galeria
Valeria since 293, and
there were no kids in that marriage. He
had a son and daughter, prior. We don't
know Valeria's age, but she'd been married to Galerius for 18
years when he dies. So
she's probably age 35-40. She
adopted his son, Candidianus, who is in his late teens, and is betrothed
to a daughter of Daza's.
b.
Maxentius is about age 33 here,
and married to Galerius' daughter (by his first wife), since 293. They have at least one son who at this point
is about age 17.
c.
Licinius, longtime chum of Galerius --
they were in the army together
-- has 'grey
hairs' so is probably 46 at this point, thus maybe nine years older than
Constantine.
d.
Licinius is single; this is very odd. He was made Caesar back in 308 (Carnuntum), yet
no marriage deal was made? So maybe Licinius first
planned to marry Valeria. In
310, Galerius lay dying, and Maximian was
dead. Licinius knew Valeria for years.
It would have been best, to marry him.
If Licinius had proposed, she said no; or, made excuses to delay. So the match
with Constantia, resulted from her
refusal/delay. (How
else account his being single in 308-310, his
later hostility towards Valeria? Why else would she be safer in Daza's
territory, per
Lactantius d.M.P. 39? Why else
return after Daza's death, "willing to bestow..
that which she denied to Daia"?)
e.
Ergo, Licinius secretly negotiated to marry Constantia, who
was Constantine's sister.
(She had to be age 18 or younger, since Constantius had
married Theodora circa 293.) Constantine would
not move against Maxentius, until he had his flanks covered. So he
covered them, after Galerius died
in 311. Licinius would
not have contracted with Constantine, so
long as Galerius lived.
There was probably another secret deal, to save Galerius'
daughter and grandson, from Maxentius.
f.
Or, the match to Constantia was
proposed while Galerius long lay dying, and he approved. Secretly. He's thinking, Maybe Constantine will get
killed; my loyal friend Licinius
will get the Empire, and my son Candidianus
can succeed him. Maybe Diocletian,
broached the idea in the first place.
g.
In any case, Diocletian knew
and approved, surely. For Diocletian was
against Daza, for Constantine, for unity, and this 'procedure' was the
very thing he'd set up. This explains
why Diocletian didn't help Maximian nor Maxentius. They weren't playing Empire according
to the rules Diocletian set up.
h.
So Licinius thinks
he will eventually inherit Europe and northwestern Asia, at least. Through conquest, through marriage. Cheaper victory, bide your time.
i.
So Licinius thinks
Daza will be his other long-term enemy, not because Daza is
any good, but because he's rich. And
hot-headed. Proven, back in 310 when
he started calling himself Augustus, campaigning against the
Persians. While Licinius went
against the Sarmatians.
j.
So when Galerius dies
in May 311, Daza and Licinius arm,
but don't fight. Daza had
moved first, presenting Licinius with a quid pro quo.
k.
For Daza
realizes he needs a stronger dynastic claim; being a
nephew of Galerius is no longer enough. Daza's
daughter's betrothal to Candidianus, isn't
enough.
l.
So Daza also secretly negotiated with Maxentius. Perfect reason for alliance, in the name of Galerius'
KIDS. Recall, it took a whole year for Galerius to
die. So Daza allied
with Max earlier, not as Lactantius states in his Para 43. So
his Para 42
on Diocletian's death was retrospective exposition. (Barnes
footnote 39: "Lactantius, Mort.
Pers. 42, 3 f.: 'ita viginti annorum felicissimus imperator ... in odium vitae deductus, postremo fame atque
angore confectus est. Unus iam supererat de adversariis dei <Maximinus>; cuius nunc exitum ruinamque
subnectam'."
If 'supererat
' references the OFFICE of
Imperator, Barnes errs. Next, Lactantius'
paras. 42 and 43 mix time elements.
Maxentius erected Daia's statues AFTER he and Constantine went to
war; surely Maximian wasn't alive; he opposed Daia. Para 44 is the
war with Maxentius; then
Constantine tears the statues down. Nor
would Diocletian object, as Maximian disgraced the Empire. Last, in Latin or Greek you switch time
elements back and forth to Explain Cause for a current reality, even in
the same sentence: a form of parallelism
which can't translate well, as exegetes struggling with Daniel 11, know.)
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Reconciliation Hypothesis for Diocletian's Death Date in 316, cont.
m.
So Daza wants leverage with Licinius. So he wants Valeria -- daughter of Diocletian, not merely Galerius'
widow -- and the son of Galerius, Candidianus, his future
son-in-law. And if Licinius proposed
but Valeria said
no; and if Licinius was already
secretly engaged to Constantia,
well -- then all agree to Daza's demand.
n.
Since Diocletian knows
the secret match between Constantine and Licinius, he
knows Galeria will be freed from Daza,
eventually. He wants to protect his
wife, daughter and Candidianus, whom Galeria has come to love; so the boy is like a grandson to
Diocletian. He knows eventually Daza will
go down. So Diocletian
probably counsels his daughter to play along, don't worry honey you won't be
there long, just keep being nice to Daza but don't marry him.. plead the
widow-in-mourning thing, just as you did to Licinius. So, she does.
And the meanwhile, acts as eyes and ears for Diocletian.
o.
So in early summer 311, instead of fighting --
Licinius and Daza negotiate a split of
the territory; Daza is willing
to take less, if he gets the daughter and son. With Prisca, Diocletian's
wife, as a hostage. With visiting rights to Diocletian, of
course. How secret this is from Constantine,
well...
p.
So Licinius thinks
he hedges his bets in case his own marriage to Constantia, won't
work out. Then Licinius can 'rescue'
them from the likely-to-lose, Daza. It's
a royal hostage situation. No wonder Valeria can
refuse. The union between Licinius and Constantine is a
secret, still; so Daza has no reason to be threatened.
q.
So in summer 311, along
with his 'share' of the territory, Prisca, Valeria, Candidianus go
with Daza for a very long visit.
Get acquainted with the betrothed.
r.
Daza can then pledge loyalty to Maxentius, but
plead secrecy: hey guy I can't send
you troops, I've got to keep up appearances, here.
s.
Now it's autumn 312, and
after letting Maxentius create a cause de guerre so The
Senate Will Beg To Be Invaded, Constantine plays
the in hoc signo vicious game.
Then Maxentius drowns, in hoc signo traduces,
28 October 312 everyone lovey-dovey, all
hail SPQR and
now I'll tax you worse than Maxentius ever could.
t.
Now ex-post-Roma in November
312, Valeria needn't be coy. She refuses to marry Daza, as
he's next to go. She doesn't tell him
that, of course. But she needs to get
back to Diocletian, as Daza IS the
next to go. Maybe she pleads leave based
on Diocletian's health, lemme go to Daddy and chat
with him. Anything to get away. Daza
retorts, Your dowry belongs to me; go
to Daddy on your own. So, she tries.
He obstructs her. [Yet Valeria could
have reached Diocletian within six weeks, see post
and shipping
times; he'd pay whoever transported her, once she got there. If Daza really
chased her from place to place, he isn't after her money. He could legally keep her property, just SEND
her back. So he's not worried she'll
leave, even campaigns next in Armenia, with his own wife and kids! In short,
someone wanted her to play maybe-I'll-marry-you with Daza,
and she thereby acts as intelligence for Diocletian et alia.]
u.
So now, it's February 313, nuptials
announcement and okay-to-be-Christian Milan Edict twixt
the happy new brothers-in-law-to-be fighting with each other.
v.
Which surprised
Daza, always the last to know. He was fighting in Armenia. So he rapidly mobilizes
to go against Licinius. In
winter. Daza thinks
Well, I've got his progeny in my custody, gotta defeat them all, then
Valeria can't refuse, I'll be her only protector. Which explains why he's
mobilizing in winter.
w.
Diocletian refused
to attend the wedding, as his wife, daughter and adopted grandson are under Daza. Instead pleads Daza let
them come to him. Daza refuses.
x.
So Constantine and Licinius become
suspicious. Surely Daza's not mobilizing ALONE, right? So both brothers-in-law
suspect secret support for Daza. But whose?
Well, Constantine can suspect Licinius and Diocletian. Licinius can
suspect Constantine and Diocletian. No one imagines that Daza acts alone.
Hence they reprimand Diocletian, for refusing to attend. (Postscript in 39, Aurelius Victor. Not to be read as cause of death.) Obviously, Diocletian is
alive and hopes to get his family back.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Reconciliation Hypothesis for Diocletian's Death Date in 316, cont.
y.
Daza leaves -- late February, for
he reaches Byzantium by April; and on the
same day he attacks Licinius -- on the 30th, he
rescinds his edict against Christians. Prisca, Valeria, and Candidianus had
escaped by then. From Syria. Trying to get to Dalmatia. Probably they
caught a boat from the coast. From there
to Thessaloniki is a standard boat route.
So from Thessaloniki, they go northwest over land, to Diocletian. That should take but six weeks. Then again, they maybe go the same route as Daza's
army, so maybe normal transport would have been used up by his troops. Maybe they first detoured south, to catch a
boat not requisitioned for his troops.
Still, they got there within two or three months. [Lactantius says Valeria showed up at
Nicomedia aka Izmir in disguise. Then fled when Candidianus (with Daza) was
executed. So she must have gone to Diocletian first,
then doubled back to follow the army. Else
she'd have no idea where to go, and would lack the means.]
z.
So 313, war between Daza and Licinius; Daza, accompanied by
his original wife and kids all dying, by summer. Licinius then
piously announces the Edict of Milan, in Nicomedia. [Notice how the wording of the
Edict contradicts Lactantius' previous paragraphs'
claim of a miraculous battle between Licinius and Daia. For the Edict announcement is after the
victory, and still Licinius doesn't
call either himself or Constantine,
Christian. So Lactantius' account
is sheer bluster. Gibbon wondered about
the 15 months' being dated after the women escape, as the Latin depicts, saying
that if that were so, the date of Lactantius' composition would have to
be after the first civil war between Licinius and Constantine. Yeah, it was -- but not by Lactantius. Others -- maybe students of his -- amended
the account, later. You can tell,
because the text suddenly varies style from that horrible effusive nonsense, to
just the facts. Compare, if you will, Chapter 50 with
the two chapters before and after. Then
compare to his Chapter
39. Contradictions and rhetorical
style shifts abound; someone's filling in
data, not paying attention to whether it FITS the original writing. What we moderns have, must be a composite
text of different editions, for you just know that Constantine would never
permit such effusive
praise of Licinius.]
aa.
Constantine
doesn't do anything to help. Licinius
notices that. Maybe it's a trap, so
Constantine can more easily win, later!
Licinius had no son in
summer 313 when he beat Daza. But in July 315, Constantia bore
him a son. So Licinius murders all rival sons. [Lactantius' account of
Licinius' actions, is sheer garbage.
Lactantius had praised
Valeria for refusing Daia, then suddenly praises Licinius for
killing Valeria? And then still praises her
and her mother at death? Fishy,
huh. Aurelius
Victor's account is rather less flattering.]
bb. So now we come to the crux of the matter. '15 months'.. begins WHEN? Lactantius doesn't say. There are 15 months from the end of 313, when
Licinius finishes fighting the Persians, and his son's birth. There are also 15+ months between his
son's birth, and Constantine's December
316 ruling at Serdica (2nd 'Serdica' in that link).
1.
Licinius was surprised
by Daza's attack, having just made peace with
him and divided up new territory back in 311. So everyone's tired. They don't want to fight. Maxentius and
then Daza, forced the issue. The
victory is a time for happiness, not murder.
2. Diocletian
wouldn't kill himself over accusations he refused to attend a wedding that he
himself had approved. They wouldn't
assassinate him, either. They need his
expertise. They need his family. (Again, post-mortem postscript
in 39 Aurelius Victor should not be read as cause for
Diocletian's death. Suetonius writes the
same way.)
3. Between
313 and 315, Licinius has
every reason to make nice with all potential heirs, because he has no son of
his own. He just finished fighting, marrying; Constantine needs
a rest, as does he. If Licinius had proposed to Valeria, he
still might entertain marrying her, too.
Or at least, befriending her. He
needs her, now: she's more mature than his wife, and remains an Augusta
of the realm. Why wouldn't he succor Candidianus and Severianus; Daza maybe
forced them to go along -- to keep Valeria compliant. Licinius is the
hero, now. He didn't start that war.
4. Moreover,
Licinius just acquired Daza's huge
territory, so needs added legitimacy, to ensure stability. The last thing he'd want, is to murder
potential allies. He could create
subkingdoms, instead. The relatives know
the territory. He doesn't. He has no motive to want uprisings, in his
newly-won lands.
5. Constantine just
got Europe and Africa; Licinius, all of Asia and a new
bride. They jointly announced toleration
and peace, too. So there's no reason to
claim Licinius immediately murdered anybody, after
he beat Daza. So Lactantius' choppy account
here -- suddenly quite weird, you must admit -- is garbled gossip or invention.
Meter Notes Paul's Chronology Chart, continued
Go to: Doc of Time PaulChrono Preface Pregnancy 1 2 14 Title Page
Go to: End Notes Meter Notes Outline Pregnant Verse Notes ChronoChart
a b c d e f g h A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Verse 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14
Appendix I links: 1st
eudokian 1st eudokian+1st epainon 2nd eudokian 2nd eudokian
God's Meaning 3rd eudokian
3rd eudokian+2nd epainon 3rd
eudokian+3rd epainon Appendix II
Reconciliation Hypothesis for Diocletian's Death Date in 316, cont.
cc.
So it's more likely all this went according
to Diocletian's plan (at n). So the rest of 313+, is
reconstruction, consolidation, peace.
dd. That
is, until 315. Again, in July
of 315, Licinianus (Jr.) was born. Aurelius Victor's 41 [4]
relates that Crispus, Constantius, and Licinius
Jr. were born; and by the time the latter was "twenty months
old", they were all named cesares.
So now we have an interval of
almost two years from July 315, to the March 317 treaty
between Licinius and Constantine. So let's account that time.
ee. 315: Licinius has his OWN
son, by a Constantine. Maybe over the ensuing months, Constantia became
unhappy with the competition she'd surely feel from Valeria and
her relatives. Maybe Licinius became
unhappy. Maybe this shift in potential
dynastic succession had everyone taking sides.
For although both emperors had barbarian incursions, the Eastern
'underbelly' of Licinius was better protected. He had good control of the trade routes. Access to Asia and China, on which Europe
depended. So economically, he had a
better chance of winning any ultimate showdown.
So could afford, to wait. Since
he's nine years older than Constantine, he'd be more inclined to relax and
enjoy his first child, than to fight. There's
still no motive for him to suddenly murder rivals: because they AREN'T
rivals. But allies.
ff.
So what happened, to create a new war? The usual scholarship puts their next war
ending at either 314 or 317. In between are the birth(s), the affair with
Bassianus, who Constantine appointed to take over Italy and Africa. Also between, had to be the reunification of Diocletian with
his family. Ancient sources are alleged to conflict: hence the modern concern over
which "3 December", Diocletian died. I propose there is no conflict in the ancient
sources, but in our reading of them.
gg. Barnes
says Constantine attacked Licinius at
Cibalae on 8
October 316 because
his own son was finally born from Fausta, and
he wanted to upstage the earlier-born, Licinianus. [See here
for more of Barnes' contention. The date
sounds right, but the contention, wrong.
Constantine already had sons of higher right. Naturally, since Fausta was a daughter of
Maximian, Constantine would resuscitate the memory of her father, for the sake
of his new son.]
So
let's think: Constantine is the
aggressor, technically. Zosimus writes
that AFTER they fight, they made a truce naming Licinius' son, then
TWENTY MONTHS OLD, a Caesar. (See end
of his para 20, Book 2 of New History.
Page
139=85 of pdf here. Text is Greek and Latin. On the web, everyone copies from the same
wrong English translation, which says 'years' vs. Latin 'months'. But
tertullian.org corrected the
translation, here.) So: 20 months from July 315, is July 317 minus
four months, or March 317.
Constantine insisted on removing Valens. Note: Licinius didn't
name his own son, Caesar. So he wasn't planning a takeover. Valens'
appointment was reactive, defensive, as Constantine was the aggressor.
So what happened between 315 and 317, to justify sudden
war? It can only be, that Diocletian
DIED. Until he died, his
presence and mediation was sought (i.e., in the nonsense with Maxentius
and Maximian, attendance at the wedding with Constantia). So Diocletian must
die first. So if Constantine and Licinius make a
truce after two battles on 1 March of 317
-- Diocletian
probably died the previous December, and was sick for a while, prior. End of Victor's
para.39 says Diocletian was 68 when he died, 9 years retired. 68-9=59. End 316-9= end 307. Balances from Carnuntum, when Maximian was told
growing cabbages was happier, and Galerius got
the Caesars he wanted, in exchange for recognizing Constantine. For until Carnuntum, the Tetrarchy wasn't
stable. Diocletian, stabilized it. So then you can say, he truly retired.
Why Licinius became
hostile to Valeria, is conjecture. Maybe she caused trouble. Maybe she was suspected of causing
trouble. Who knows. But she lost her protection, when her father
died. She and her mother. So maybe the 15 months,
is dated from Diocletian's death, not after Daza
died. Which also accounts for Licinius'
sudden anti-Christian edicts. Which accounts for why he ordered
execution for Valeria
and Prisca,
whether they 'wandered', or not. Note that Lactantius' writing is schizoid, so
you have to ask if the accounting of
Valeria, was really his. I bet
not: we all know that Church Father
writings were doctored. Time to stop
slavishly condemning, or praising them.