Update Note #1 (February 2009), where my webpages seem 'to differ' from Thieme

Update Note #2 (December 2025), Rise of Apostasy: A Very Tumultuous 2025 Update

Pastor is to teach you to think doctrine. Any teacher's purpose is to teach thinking, really. So it's not wrong to take what you learn, and play with it. It is wrong to take what you learn as a catechism, rotely repeating it as if you honored your teacher/ parent/ authority that way. Yet man imagines that with reference to God, he should engage in rituals and taboos, memorize Bible, parrot his teacher; and, those who don't do those things, must be evil. Hence some feel that if one independently uses what was learned, draws further conclusions, or even (seemingly) contrary ones, such 'unauthorized' use of the material 'undermines authority.'

This childish idea pervades all academic endeavor (it's really bad in science, seminaries, and local churches); and especially, any learning about God. It's pathetic: hence no one really learns anything; what passes for knowledge and wisdom is like bobbing in front of the Wailing Wall; like Trivial Pursuit; like flashcards.

On the other hand, God wants us to synthesize from what He teaches us, out from the pastors He appoints for us: Isaiah 53:11 (LXX) and Matthew 4:4 & Ephesians 4:11-16, not Zechariah 7:3-6. One demonstrates the efficacy of that authority by independent use of what was learned.

So I must synthesize in writing what I'd learned under the Colonel. To test my own comprehension and the overall doctrinal fit. So the purpose of these sites is to extrapolate, not summarize or repeat what he teaches, especially since his material is copyrighted, and I feel there's no substitute for hearing the audiotapes sequentially. So I'm rabidly addicted to RBT; but the Lord won't exactly give me any brownie points for that: do I really understand what His Son's Thinking, Bible Doctrine, adds up to? Not just, do you know what Operation Z is, or hamartiology, the Cross components, the Essence of God, etc. In the vocabulary we RBTers, all know. But, what do all those facts, mean in sum? The whole realm of doctrine adds up to a Picture: Him. Who, ideally, the Christian lives on. We are held accountable for what doctrines we buy, not for who teaches us. Teachers are themselves individually accountable; but they are not to blame, for what we buy. Caveat emptor.

Hence all this writing, a good 1500+ printed pages of it: consider it my own "due diligence", like analysis one must do before buying stock, property, a business. 'Buying' a doctrine is so much more critical, impacts one forever! Whether anyone else ever reads anything written here, cannot and should not, matter. We are individually accountable to the Lord. Therefore, it also doesn't matter if the material seems to or does agree with the material taught, in the eyes of another reader. What matters instead: did God lead me here to read anything? And if so, what and why? The matter is between the Lord and the reader, only.

Thus 'my' website includes side research, so the writing won't ape what he teaches. As a consequence the website not only synthesize what I've learned, but also the research results. That's why they are heavy and (usually) long. The research resoundingly corroborates what he teaches, what a royal surprise. Still, the objective is to get the Mind of Christ.

Hence, each of 'my' webpages uses a secular discipline's vocabulary slant, akin to the Colonel's analogies from Scripture to football, science, history, military science. So, some webpages have an accounting / actuarial pension / (Angelic) Trial legal / historical / military slant (Dedicated to God's Delightful "Due Diligence" Accounting, Lord vs. Satan series, The Paradox of Merit.. On Trial!); a politico-diplomatic slant (DueDisclosure.htm); math / physics / science slant (First Law of Math Conclusively Proves "Transmutation" False, parts of Due Diligence, Diplomatic Disclosure of God's Design and Satan's Counter to God: 'Script' Strategies and Tactics).

You know: when he talks the Civil War, football or military science, don't you have to sometimes go running to a history book, military dictionary or ask a football expert, so you can better get what was taught? In addition to those resources, the many good encyclopedias and BibleWorks 5 have proven valuable. BibleWorks 8 has even more collateral reference material*, plus the Targums, Peshitta, Mounce, Wallace, and little Kittle. Tim Dowley's: "The Student Bible Atlas" and "Atlas of Christian History" (which you can purchase at Amazon) is also a helpful addition.

* As of 2025, BibleWorks is no longer commercially sold. Consult Logos or Accordance, instead.

Therefore, please do not deem my website vocabulary to be 'New Age', etc. Rather, classical theology terms are often fuzzy. So I try to rephrase the same ideas, with clearer language that is not loaded with legalism.

Still, the webpages stem largely from hearing his tapes, since I'm turning over what I learned. It's surprising how easy it was to corroborate class material in Scripture. For what it's worth, I've heard 1981 Revelation, PPG, 1985 Ephesians, David, Colossians, 1991 Israel, James 4, Romans (not all), Hebrews, 1980 1 John (not all), 1992 Spiritual Dynamics (through 2001, currently in it); others are partial series, or really old ones, like gap, Genesis, Assyrian Crisis, etc. I have almost all of his recorded teaching through the year 2001; I haven't yet heard it all, of course.

The older series are valuable background for the post-1985 material; you can see how he grew in understanding, why he made the revisions; further, the older tapes are much more exegesis-heavy; 1985 and following tends to be post-graduate-level speed: i.e., very advanced, refined, corollaic, so if you don't know how he 'got there', you won't as well understand what he says. Hence my bias that the tapes should be heard sequentially. You see his own spiritual understanding burgeon, so the process of that understanding, also burgeons in you.

This is particularly true with reference to the development of what became his "Love is the Integrity of God" theme from May 2000, onward. You can trace how it began and developed if you start in the 1977 Romans series, and then listen sequentially. From Romans, came 1 John and then Revelation, then 85 Ephesians, then 91 Israel and James 4, then 92 Spiritual Dynamics. In that latter series, beginning at the tail end of 1996, the Love-is-the-Integrity-of-God doctrine is laid out. I actually learned the doctrine itself from the 1997+ tapes, and wrote LordvSatan1.htm's "Integrity Properties" section as a result, back during the year 2000. Four years later, I heard what he was teaching back in 2000. It was quite a surprise, therefore, to see that the "Integrity Properties" in LordvSatan1.htm already summarized what he said! So the flow of development, is discernible.

Far as I'm concerned, his "Love is the Integrity of God" answers all the theological conundra which have plagued Christianity for centuries: simple circle of Love from the Love contract of Isaiah 53:10-12, referred back to over and over again in the New Testament, by the subjective-and-objective genitive of ἀγάπη. Awesome economy and deft expression, in God's Word. Will take mainstream theology perhaps a century, to discern and expatiate on how this "Love is the Integrity of God" is the capstone answer to all theological debate, apparent discrepancies, contradictions, etc. In our understanding of Bible. Can't put my spiritual life on hold waiting for credentialed folks to discover what the Word of God already perfectly says, however. So much about 'Thieme's Theme', as I like to call it, pervades my website. , Romans (not all), Hebrews, 1980 1 John (not all), '1992 Spiritual Dynamics (through 2001, currently in it); others are partial series, or really old ones, like gap, Genesis, Assyrian Crisis, etc. I have almost all of his recorded teaching through the year 2001; I haven't yet heard it all, of course.

Of course, RBT teaches so well he makes it easy to find the proof. You can tell exactly why a translation he renders, is apt, especially now with Bible software tools. Unfortunately, you can thus also tell 'Christianity' is downright incompetent, i.e., Bible translation/interpretation errors would flunk first-year Greek/Hebrew, in seminary. Some things, one would rather not know. Because this incompetence is so great, a lot of webspace is spent on it (in a broad-brush, impersonal way): I have to account for the divergences between what the Colonel says and what the others say about Bible. Yet past teachers and theologians didn't have Bible software. Thanks to their very hard work, we can get Bible and their commentaries, on computer. So: if those who made mistakes had the same tools we do — would they have made those mistakes? I doubt it, don't you? So to honor them, seriously — let's find the mistakes and correct them before the 21st century ends. They'd surely do that favor for us, were we the ones who made the errors. Caveats and "Testing" section on this page thus focus on the incompetences; though every site is sprinkled with stuff on this problem.

Bonus: the vast incompetence yields an empirically-testable pattern of satanic involvement which — if you know what the Colonel has taught on the Angelic Conflict — exactly matches what he's taught. Hence Satan's Counter to God: 'Script' Strategies and Tactics was born from the pattern of the incompetence being so evident. Satan's attacks all have a "DIOS" pattern, to make God 'foreign' to us: Derision, Imbalance, Obfuscation, Substitution. Satan & Co. Follow this pattern religiously 😏 in everything from politics to how they get Bible verses to be mistranslated. So once you know the pattern, you can empirically test it on anything. Predictable like the sunrise. So the larger issue is not man's incompetence, but demonic involvement to 'encourage' us hapless humans, to be goofy about God. Hence I'll sound critical, and often: to point out how stupid and blind we have been — thus the only possible explanation for such stupidity and blindness, is the 'help' our negative volitions get, from Satan & Co. In which case, the motive to blame anyone for anything, dies: for who of us isn't blind? Hence the reason for dissecting error, is to learn how to spot Satan & Co.'s attacks in our own lives; to find our own landmines of negativity; not, to point fingers at others.

It's vital to empirically test Satan & Co.'s strategy and tactics. The pattern is always the same, so is covered in detail within the "Lord vs Satan". Consequently, one soon forgets 'who' made errors, for we all are targets! Once you can identify each 'Corvette' they fly — so you can spot "Incoming!" when it happens... Rather than afterwards. Thus your fallen comrades did not fall in vain.

Ergo, I shy from using the Colonel's nomenclature, to avoid aping him. For, it's not about the Colonel; it's about what the Bible says.

See, most who will read these webpages are clueless as to his vocabulary; they have at most heard of some old book or short-term student's personal reaction to him or the church. As a consequence there is a thoroughly baseless rancor against either him, or others of the church. So one shouldn't sound denominational, since it's Scripture which matters. Not, the teacher's packaging of that Scripture.

People both within and without the church have long been trying to turn the Colonel's teaching into a denomination; surely that movement will continue, and at length, 'succeed'. Which movement, is amply demonstrated on the internet: instead of competently analyzing his teaching with respect to its content, a website writer often makes the Colonel himself the focus, whether pro- or con- his ministry. Nor can they well summarize or refute any content he's taught.

On the other side of the ledger, too many RBTers just parrot the Colonel's teachings and vocabulary; they are trying to be faithful, of course. But it comes off as slavish and non-thinking, as if promoting the teacher, rather than learning what was taught; which gives those who seek to vilify him, even more (unwarranted) fuel.

This is how Satan religifies: he sets up attackers, which makes those under a teacher, constrained to evidence doglike loyalty.

Since the Colonel died, there's been an increase in the tendency of those who heard his teaching, to coalesce into a new denomination. This tendency is abetted by those opposed, the so-called Thieme-bashers of the 1960's and 1970's, who like bad pennies, always turn up when Thieme gets attention. This accentuates polarization, which kills theological advance. So another flavor of Revelation 17 harlotry will result, replaying what Acts wryly records as Christianity's first-century foibles. Instead of learning from the Lord, the dippy Jerusalem Christians went back to the Mosaic Law and morphed what they were given, into the religion that culminated in Catholicism and Protestantism, today. Demon nations. Not, Bible.

So if we under RBT likewise tighten into a denomination, we will fail what Thieme taught as "the tandem": b) learn Bible, in order to a) learn to Love God. Failure means having b) but not a), thus becoming legalistic: that's the history of Christianity. Yet a) but not b), creates emotionalistic religiosity: that too, is the history of Christianity. You see both failure types all over Bible, especially in Acts, Corinthians, Galatians.

Many within the RBT-taught groups now illustrate b) without a corresponding a), hence our excessive focus on how doctrinal we are. Even if we get all the doctrine right but don't have Love, we are nothing, says 1 Corinthians 13:1-3.

Now if b) is too divorced from a), then even b) corrodes. So notice that some RBT pulpit practitioners, slowly morph teaching toward false doctrines, i.e., faith-plus salvation ideas, a delay between Rapture and Tribulation; a claim Temple practices post-Crucifixion, Daniel 9:27, Revelation 11, are valid; that Christ's literal blood paid for something; that (🤣!) He had to take HIS blood to heaven for His Payment to be efficacious, etc.

Thus 'the doctrinal movement', swayed as it is by human approbation, contradicts Bible. Its practitioners use RBT vocabulary, so you are fooled into thinking that:

A) Thieme taught those falsehoods (i.e., he instead stridently explained how the 1948 Israel formation was not from God, and that the Temple should not be rebuilt); and,

B) that the Bible says those falsehoods. 😱

Your big hint 'the doctrinal movement' people are way off the Mark: their bios and websites also appeal to you on the grounds of how respectable, in-demand/popular, how much-travelled they are. In short, the truth content of what they say — which is the only valid criterion, discernible from anyone in under five minutes — is not the appeal made. Warning, Bill Robinson!

Again, history repeats itself. By the 90's AD you had the beginning of the bilious "Church Fathers", whose apostasy was so bad, you need Pepto-Bismol to read even 1 Clement, for example. So should you wonder that a 'movement' with its human-viewpoint 'consensus' standards, would result in those silly "councils" of Constantine's day?

Now, since "the doctrinal movement" is going off in the wrong direction, you shouldn't be surprised to know that it has critics. You can view these critics simply by Googling "The Doctrinal Movement". And oh, when you read their critiques, you realize the critics are even more off-base, even more anti-Bible. Thus Satan works his own tandem: 1) distort the Truth and then 2) advertise the distortion by raising up another even more distorted view, as a critic of the first distorted view. Thus 1) the truth becomes too complicated to know, and 2) one ends up picking one or the other, false 'sides'. This too, has been the history of Christianity.

By contrast, Thieme constantly harped on using Bible to "apprehend the exact thought of the writer". Not, to make the Bible fit into one's prescribed doctrinal classifications. For, Bible is first, not our doctrines from it. Once the process of learning Bible is reversed into making it corroborate what you believe, you make what you believe the god instead of God. That's precisely how Catholicism got started: a bowel movement. Let's not ruin the teaching we got by denominizing it, okay? For then we demonize and deminimize it.

So I'm not trying to 'sell' the Colonel's ministry, as God needs no help — remember when the Colonel said we don't get out and "push the plane"? Nor do I mask the fact I'm merely a student under him, writing webpages so to understand his teaching of Bible Doctrine better.

To sum up, my website synthesize and extrapolate from RBT, but do not parrot; the goal is to account for what Bible says, not to ape or even defend a teacher. If the teacher is corroborated, then God did that, and I'm glad to see it. But the first goal is Christ first... In me. In you. For, we all must account for what we learned down here, when we go 'up there', at the Revelation 4:1 Rapture Trumpet.

From what I can tell, my website material corroborates and extrapolates from the 50 years of classes R.B. Thieme Jr. It wasn't really my intention to corroborate, so much as to vet the data myself. But corroboration has largely been the result.

Bear in mind that good teachers constantly revise what they've taught in the past, to upgrade. So if you're familiar with, say, classes from 40 years ago, much of that material was revised in 1997 and following. Of 1992 Spiritual Dynamics (Series 376, running 12 years total). Teaching is an ongoing process, very academic, always pressing forward.

Let me provide an example, regarding Rebound. A frequent criticism of Rebound is that the Filling of the Spirit is not linked in 1 John 1:9, so you don't know that you need to name sins to get His Filling You With Unfelt Perception Power. Frankly, such criticism betrays a lack of Bible study, for Greek καθαρίζω is much used in the Old Testament as a condition for the Spirit to fill the temple — so when John uses καθαρίζω (and when Peter uses its cognate noun καθαρισμός in 2 Peter 1:9, a very mistranslated verse), you should understand immediately that John is indeed talking about the Filling of the Spirit.

So too, you should know from the oodles of Old Testament verses requiring believers to name their sins — that's why you took the animals to the priest, for crying out loud. I tried to explain all this in my Youtube video on Rebound, "Why We Need 1 John 1:9". But you can quickly see the import by scanning Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Psalm 32 and Psalm 66, 2 Chronicles 7, Zechariah 7, Malachi 3, many other passages. Not admitting sin was the reason for discipline pan-Old Testament. Defiled Temple resulted in no filling. We are the Temple Now. Very easy to see why all John had to do was use the "purification" keyword, in 1 John 1:9.

Now, in "the Law of Double Punishment" subseries within 1992 Spiritual Dynamics, the Colonel explained how your post-salvation sins are not forgiven — duh, that's what the Old Testament said too — because people in the congregation were complaining about Rebound. So if you've not heard that upgrade in the doctrine, then you'll surely want to get it. Start, though, at the beginning of 1992 Spiritual Dynamics, since the whole doctrine of Rebound is upgraded beginning with Lesson 1.

Good teaching never stands pat on past lessons. It always upgrades.

Having said this, my website material does seem to differ from the teaching in these key advanced respects:

• My website material on Isaiah 53's five infinitives, showing how Isaiah embeds God's 490-year time grant system in that meter, is wholly new. Thieme never taught these things. Yet I learned them as a result of being under the Colonel. In short, he equips us to be able to study Bible and then when we do, we 'find' things. It's really the Bible's information, not our own, so the 'find' is really of and from God, not of and from us; and, if from God, it will be provable under God.

• • Furthermore, these 'finds' buttress all prior teaching. So I consider these extrapolations from RBT material, not contradictions. The principal page containing this information is in the Poetic Meter Index, but the DDNA and Lord vs. Satan are related to the Isaiah 53 material.

• The 490-year time grants are provably God's System for Granting Time since Adam. Thieme never taught this directly per se, and what he did say about the 490-year grants, is differently benchmarked. So my website material disagrees on the benchmarks, on the beginning point, and the end points — yet with the same conclusions. Further, the material reinforces the Colonel's longstanding Blessing by Association doctrine, that God uses believers to buy time — first instance of this doctrine is in the Genesis series on Genesis 5. In his teaching, Thieme accounted Daniel 9 as a human king's decree, which is not true: at that time, he was following Dispensational convention. Daniel 9:24 is God's Decree, so the measure is from Temple fall, 586 BC. From there, you get an exact chronology which still tallies — albeit in a very different way, using solar years — to what Thieme taught as the end point, the Crucifixion on what should have been, real Passover.

More: this timing is part of a long line of Time grants the Bible accounts beginning at Adam's fall, and Crucifixion is the 1470th anniversary of that original Passover. As you might know, many 'scholars' contest whether the Lord actually died on Passover, and how long He was in the Grave, so the Bible verses seem to conflict, even in the Greek. They don't: Passover Plot proves the foregoing from Bible, and also backs up Thieme's year 2000 claim that the Lord was actually born on Chanukah, 4 BC.

I made many videos documenting God's Orchestration of Time from Scripture. At first, just the numbers in Bible were documented; now, I'm finding proof in Bible's own Hebrew meter, starting in Psalm 90, which Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, and even Paul's Ephesians 1:3-14, employ. Best place to start seeing all that is in the Mirroring Timeline. The exegesis and the history are plotted out from Adam forward, so you can vet the data in the Bible. Videos in each series after the first, are:

• • Genesis series
  • Psalm 90 Meter of Time. Covers Psalm 90, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9
  • Greek Geek Stuff Episode 10: begins coverage of Pauline use of Psalm 90's, Isaiah 53's, and Daniel 9's meter; dovetailing with the Psalm 90 playlist. Keep watching until you can't stand it anymore.
  • Yapping Most High, comprehensive explanation of the Time rules, with some detail about Daniel 9 and Isaiah 53. Again, keep watching until you can't stand it anymore. (Prior Part 10 videos covered the meaning of Vernal Equinox.) This is the main difference versus the Colonel. He was still deferring to conventional 'scholarship' which claimed you should measure Bible's years as lunar. Bible doesn't do that, it only uses solar years. So it will be important to prove that for yourself, in Bible. All Bible's dates and numbers are suddenly easily proven true and converge into a pattern, if you simply use solar years instead of lunar. Jews are wrong to use lunar years, as are the scholars. This error is centuries old, and it reflects the fact no one revisited the Bible de novo, but instead relied on 'respectable' opinion.

However, every doctrine the Colonel taught about believers buying time, about Dispensations, etc., is proven correct if you again just switch to solar years in your accounting. In fact, that's what started me down this road: I didn't know where Thieme 'got' his teaching of "believers buy time", a doctrine he's taught since at least 1977 (Genesis series). So I kept asking God for the Bible backup, and what you see here, is the ongoing result. So God's demonstrating why Thieme's teaching is correct (and not only him, of course), but to do that one must correct the idea of 'year' and a few other things, as you'll see me cover in the videos.

More specifically, my website 'differences' versus Thieme are as follows. The videos and webpages listed in above, show extensive Bible backup and explain how these 'differences' were derived. I want to stress that every 'difference' ends up vindicating something he taught. He himself was always seeking to refine and correct what he taught, as you can repeatedly hear him say from 1985 onward, in class.

• Daniel 9:25 is not dated from a human king's decree, but from God's Decree (context of Daniel 9:24, which harkens back to Daniel 9:2, which ties back to Jeremiah);
• The year measures are intercalated (solar), not lunar;
• God is restoring 126 years of lost Temple time owing to its early demise, reserving seven because David had time grants which ended 7 years prior to a restored 490. In short, the deadline had to be 'covered' by a 1000-year time grant, but that grant ended 7 years earlier, hence the 7-year 'reserve' for the Tribulation had to come after Messiah, not before.
• The Millennium was a scheduled known year in the future, based on David's death.
• David's death is seven years later than scholars routinely account, because they misread 1Kings 6:1 and miss the context of David's 7 years living post-retirement, in 1Kings 1:1-2:10.
• The Millennium is really a 1050-year period, not merely 1000 years, with the last 50 being a voting period for the world. Actually this accounting has been true ever since Adam, but the last grant of it, we call the "Millennium" because it's eschatological to us.

Now, it's possible that Thieme knew all this already, but as yet I can't find it in the lessons. Hence I try to extensively document all this accounting from Bible (using only the Bible's method of dating from Adam through 2007) so you can vet 'my' claims. This information is totally unknown to Christendom, so there is nothing like this material on the internet; please be skeptical of 'my' material until you see it for yourself. The primary webpage is the Poetic Meter Index to assist in vetting. You'll want to review the Passover dating, which 'fits' the Lord's Chanukah 4 BC Birthdate (covered by the Colonel in the year 2000 1992 Spiritual Dynamics classes) with His Death date, proving from Bible how Bible exactly predicted both to the very day. So we have no excuse to not know when He was born, and when He died. Only the Bible's dates are used (i.e., I didn't use outside sources, but only Bible).

Upshot: what the Colonel said in Lessons 25-29 of Isaiah 53 series, and what he said in the Daniel series Lesson 45 (on Daniel 9:25) are corroborated, but with a different and much more elaborate accounting than those lessons provide. So while the website material contradicts Thieme's statements of the accounting, yet the material corroborates his conclusions.

• There is no Star of Bethlehem. Initially, in 1965 Matthew when covering Matthew 2 exegesis, the Colonel stated that the magi didn't actually see a star, but used "see" in the sense of prophecy. Yet if you go over the Greek of Matthew 2 compared to Luke 1-2, you find that the so-called 'star' is likely a guardian angel for the Royal Family during that first year. It cannot be a literal star, given the Deuteronomy 18 proscription against using stars for divination. The verbs used of the 'star' itself (i.e., not what Matthew records people saying about it), are all verbs used for conscious, sentient beings. All this, with notes on the Greek in the verses, is in the "Nativity Narrative".

• In my webpages, Thieme's 1992 Spiritual Dynamics Series on spiritual maturation, was condensed into a six-page chart, with the five amalgamated infinitives of Isaiah 53:10-11, neatly 'driving' the process. This chart and the process itself — including videos — is the focus of Part Three of the Lord vs. Satan. Refer to Flow Chart of the Spiritual Maturation Process (SMP.DOC) for chart data.

Basically the chart summarizes the 1992 Spiritual Dynamics series, which is absolutely fabulous. Thieme didn't teach the SMP.DOC's five (LXX amalgamated) infinitives from Isaiah 53:10-11 as the process; but as you hear what these infinitives do, you'll be amazed how well they 'dovetail' to what he said. What happened to Christ, were those infinitives. What happens to us, are those infinitives. So once more, what seems like a 'difference' in the webpages, only ended up confirming what we RBTers, have heard all these years. If you are an RBTer and you've not gotten (Series 376) 1992 Spiritual Dynamics, I heartily urge you start getting it now, and listen sequentially. Series begins with Rebound and its Bible backup, and goes forward through all "10 Problem-Solving Devices" as you'll see in the chart. Takes him 12 years to cover the material, and when he hits PSD#10, he goes on a tangential discovery of what "Love of God" means, which as said earlier, is likely the most important theological clarification for the 20th century.

Beyond these things, I can't think of any conclusion in the webpages which materially differs from what the Colonel teaches. Everything else seems mere extrapolation, corollaic. I make a big stink about how the Trinity should be described as "Three and One" rather than "Three in One" as the badly-worded Westminster Confession claims. But really I got that from the Colonel's many upgraded explanations of Trinity, especially when He called Them "Triplets" (I forget which class that was, but it was somewhere around 1997-2000 of Spiritual Dynamics). So three persons and one essence. Much easier to understand, than the goofy Hydra-headed definitions in either Westminster Confession or "Unicity" in the Catholic Encyclopedia. Due Diligence Disclosure "Trinity" has a more detailed explanation.

Again, it wasn't my intent to corroborate, but to vet the information myself, before the Lord. What ended up happening, was an extreme extrapolation, corroboration — even where contradicting them — with the result that I'm very surprised. Ergo this disclosure. Nonetheless, please exercise caution as you read, using 1 John 1:9 as needed, so you don't waste God's or your own, time.

---

"Brainout" has since passed away (2023) and is now absent from the body and face-to-face with the Lord, she's screaming: "He's Gorgeous!!! He's Gorgeous!!! I can't get enough of Him!!!". Well, this is what I am imagining at least 😅.

Therefore this new section is written by me — as the Americans with trumpitis would call: a "Nasty Canadian" 👿. Unfortunately this section is going to be coincidentally nasty and it honestly makes me feel sick to my stomach, to write.

What's not so gorgeous is what's happening to the Church and the majority of Christians under Thieme (believers and pastors alike). Many seem to disregard the fact that the Colonel stressed over and over that we're in a spiritual warfare of thought. The demons aren't going to stand idly by, 🤦 especially not with a revolutionary pastor like Thieme and especially not at the end of a '490' in 2030. If you don't use 1 John 1:9 a thousand times a day, talk to God on the daily, and meticulously study Bible Doctrine under your Right Pastor (unless you are a pastor), you'll eventually become Satan's dogfood. And boy oh boy, does Satan ever delight in messing up those learning under Thieme. It's effortless for the demons to influence and give you ideas you think are your own when you dip out from using 1 John 1:9. Or maybe you never really understood what it really meant? Yes. You are to use it constantly, 24/7, while talking to God, 24/7.

As the venerable King James VI & I once said:

"And therefore in case he forget himself (his unthankfulness being in the same measure of height) the sadder and sharper will his correction be; and according to the greatness of the height he is in, the weight of his fall will recompense the same: for the further that any person is obliged to God, his offence becomes and grows so much greater than it would be in any other. Jupiter's thunderclaps light more often and sorer upon the high & stately oaks than on the low and supple willow trees: and the highest bench is slickest to sit upon."

In other words, the taller you are (i.e. under a revolutionary pastor like Thieme), the greater and more catastrophic your fall will be. And the demons will prioritise this fall, of yours.

Yes, Thieme had some insignifcant bloopers in the earlier material before the 1980's: which as I'm finding out are mostly because he was referencing what other scholars or pastors said, not having time to personally investigate it himself. A few such as: referencing what scholars said about "Q Gospel" (obviously false — Christ was trilingual and knew Greek, Hebrew, Latin... and the Greek wordplay proves what has been written was always intended as 'original'), that Judas was an unbeliever (you can't be an Apostle and an atheist at the same time), or that the Phoenicians produced the original Hebrew alphabet (Proto-Sinaitic and ultimately Paleo-Hebrew was always Jewish and borrowed by the Phoenicians and others, not the other way around).

However... there's a big difference between common 'bloopers' we all make and straight up 'apostasy'. We all make mistakes that are not intentional, but straight up apostasy and exiting God's System is a deliberate choice. What I'm observing is that claimed students under Thieme never seem to care about these minor bloopers, they take the actual truths the Colonel taught and discard those instead 🤣, most famously there are many who claimed to have studied under Thieme but then immediately devolve into believing: "prolife" 🤮, deny the Pre-Tribulation rapture, or immediately pick up the Lordship Salvation. 🤦

Let me be very clear. If you deny: 1) Believe only to be permanently saved, 2) the Pre-Tribulation Rapture 3) that soul life begins at birth (there is no soul life in the womb), you are not in God's System, and are utterly, totally, and wholly apostate by choice through negative volition. These are fundamental "baby basics" truths that are intrinsic to the Divine Essence Box. 🍼✝️

We are forbidden to judge pastors, publicly shame them, etc. The problem is to be given to God and we are to pray for pastors because they have the hardest job in the world. However... there are some very high-level pastors and students under Thieme (or claim to be) who have rapidly gone apostate — to the point where they don't even know the absolute basics Thieme taught in the 1960's and violate the three critical doctrines above. If you can't grasp the baby basics above, you've not even left spiritual kindergarten and have no capacity for advanced Bible Doctrine. There is a difference between writing an anonymous report about apostasy in the Church and superfluously judging others.

The problem has now reached criticality ☢️ and these Revelation 17 Christians are rapidly destroying the United States. It's probably important for anyone (under the Colonel or otherwise) to recognise these patterns of apostasy so you:
a) pocket what's said here and wake up when the divine discipline comes,
b) run away like the wind and avoid these apostates 'roleplaying' as if they have anything to do with Thieme,
c) to clarify what Thieme taught so the dangers of those lying are known: Thieme repeatedly said himself those who deny Biblical Truths such as the Gospel being believe only + permanent, are wallowing in negative volition.

Here's an anonymous (alpha / beta / gamma) profiling of the apostasy I consistently observed:

Had any of the three above actually listened to the Colonel with the "baby basics" 🍼✝️ and then actually gone through the Greek and Hebrew (with positive volition) that they keep 'claiming' they do, they'd already know:

1. Human life begins at birth with the first breath. There is never any soul life in the womb. There is zero tolerance for catering to Satan's "prolife" doctrine. As soon as you even associate yourself to "prolife" directly or indirectly, you are apostate. Anyone believing in prolife is an enemy to the cross. Full stop.
2. There is a Pre-Tribulation Rapture and therefore believers purchase time by studying His Word (under their Right Pastor) and by talking and asking things to God, 24/7. If you know this, you will not slobber over the "End Times" and instead just more voraciously study the Bible. You would also know the two cases for the rapture: a) enough Pleroma believers complete, b) the Church goes completely apostate. In both situations the response is always... Learning the Bible.
3. Salvation is a nonmeritorious gift, never a loan. Salvation cannot be lost. Denying this one in particular, and you deny "Love is the (genitive) integrity of God" and therefore the Bible and God Himself.

Many of these people under (or formerly under) Thieme are so delusional that they're now accusing the sins of unbelievers in their country as being the source of the problems in the United States. 🤦 Mostly hyperventilating on sexual sins that classic legalists love 🙄 (yeah, as if they don't sin themselves??? 1 John 1:8 and 1 John 1:10 much?). Excuse me? Are you people dumb? The Colonel stressed over and over, Jesus Christ controls history, the believer purchases time (Ephesians 5:16). If the believer is apostate and nobody's is 'online' to keep the conduit going (and keep in mind both Thieme and brainout are gone now so someone in the United States has to fill that void) God won't bless them or their country. I'm not in the United States (geographical Will of God), so my personal growth and being in God's System has no effect on all of you people in the United States. And they're even happily going along with the very Russian-sponsored Donald J. Trump (as if R.B. Thieme didn't warn endlessly about Russia, pointing out the idiocy of Franklin D. Roosevelt who kept the Russians fed instead of letting them starve: which if they starved to death they wouldn't be slaughtering all of the actual Christians in Ukraine right now 🤬🤬🤬).

And don't even get me started on Charlie Kirk! He obviously died the "sin unto death" (face-to-face with death), because of his insane degree of apostasy, prolife, pro-russia, antisemitism, and cancerous ideologies that he branded as God's (violating the third commandment). If you devote your whole life to branding apostasy as God's truth and infect other Christians, your time is prematurely terminated in a very visible and horrible way. And you're telling me there's people under Thieme who call Charlie Kirk an invisible hero?!?! I'll tell you what Charlie Kirk is: a very visible loser believer. The first clue should have been Charlie Kirk's ties with Russian propaganda, but I guess everyone forgot what the Colonel taught? I can't believe you people... supporting Russia and actual communists and apostates. 🤮🤮🤮

It's highly likely God will punish the United States like you've never seen if everyone continues to refuse 1 John 1:9 (I mean actually using it, a thousand times a day, not just pretending you are). And this is probably why God strategically had me born outside of the United States, because He knows none of you are going to wake up, or 'get it'. 😔

After reviewing more content from other students under Thieme, they're lying as well about studying Greek and Hebrew, believing in hosts of false doctrines that Thieme already refuted a million times over. There's no value to studying Greek and Hebrew if you have negative volition (hint hint: how backwards and apostate the "Church Fathers" were). And now, inventing their own weird theology (like "speaking in tongues of angels", give me a break 🤮 — the "speaking in tongues" means human languages in the Greek, and does not apply to the Church Age dispensation). Let me say this again: nobody under Thieme should believe in: prolife, Lordship Salvation, defunct spiritual gifts not a part of this dispensation, get their jollies from the "End Times", or deny the Pre-Tribulation rapture. If you do, you're not even past spiritual kindergarten, you've learned nothing and are in negative volition towards God. The Colonel may not even actually be your right pastor...

Many Christians today know dramatically less Bible Doctrine than King James VI & I did 400 years ago (and King James didn't have computers or access to everything we do, so his much larger bloopers are to be expected, but not ours). Calvinism, Prolife, denying of the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, Preterism, Lordship Salvation, "End Times" slobbering — all of this garbage is obsolete with the advent of "the computer" and Bible Software, let alone with a teacher like Thieme who rolled it out on an easy silver platter for anyone to learn.

King James himself knew about Eternal Security 400 years ago and wouldn't have supported the later Roman Catholic sponsored "prolife" (he could also read Hebrew and undoubtedly knew נִשְׁמַ֣ת חַיִּ֑ים). So then, why are people supposedly "learning" under Thieme not able to comprehend these absolute basic doctrines that King James already knew from legacy theology under much less fortunate circumstances? Why is the Church regressing? Why do we now have literal nests of "prolife pastors" lying that they studied under Thieme? 🤮 Blind, deaf, & dumb?

Just use 1 John 1:9. 🤦 Get under your actual Right Pastor. 🤦 Actually talk to God for once in your life. 🤦

I was nearly shaking between fury and tears reading the Greek verses above (if you can actually read the Greek instead of lying about it, as they do). You the 'enemies of the cross' have no idea what you've done, or are doing. Anyone with negative volition who lies and says they're even remotely associated to Thieme and supports "prolife" or "russia", run far, far, far away. They don't know Bible Doctrine or Christ if He bit them.

Slava Ukraini. Слава Україні. Glory to Ukraine, and oh yes, I absolutely do pray for Ukraine and Israel every day, and I do ask God to have Canada to support Ukraine. What are all of you going to tell God on the bema?