I detest vile Donald Trump more than anything, but it is true that climate change is a hoax. You need look no farther than the official Paris Agreement itself to know it's instead a political gambit for developing countries to get money from the developed countries, all under the stinking United Notions.
But hey: just read the official Paris Agreement
, via the UN-sponsored official download site, see for yourself. Pick one of the 'Authentic' pdfs on the right frame on the page, in your fav language.
If you're on Android, you can't access the right side of the page, cuz the web designers at the UN are too dumb to live. So:
English text of Agreement: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_backg ... eement.pdf
French: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_backg ... eement.pdf
Spanish: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_backg ... eement.pdf
It is technically an attachment to the 1992 Framework Convention
which defines terms in the Paris Agreement (see the latter's Article 1). So here;s the link to the 1992 Framework Convention, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
. The Convention is an update on a 1972 agreement, but so far I don't see much ref to it in the 1992 Convention's language.
Paris and 1992 Convention are VERY different. The latter is vague, the former is just short of a mandate binding on parties, with a clause in Article 16 that allows the Members to CREATE a virtual dictatorship if they want.
With the UN itself at the head, of course (Article 17). So what started as a kind of mutual recognition (based o false science, but still harmless) is now turning into a way to destroy a nation's sovereignty via the successive increasing control of other nations.
Converted to audio: http://www.brainout.net/downloads/ParisAgreement.mp3
Firefox Text2Voice addon is what I used. Microsoft Anna, if set at 4 4 pitch and speed, does a decent job of reading in FoxitReader.
Meanwhile, if you've no time, read this short 2015 article published by left-wing politico (so not a right-wing diatribe):
http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/20 ... ess-000326
The reason why you know it's a hoax, is so easy to think out there's only one conclusion: we're being lied to and expected to do no thinking. The hoax analysis
is short and simple, turned into a 'Moment', here:
I used to be very pro-UN, until I got a scholarship to study there in the mid1970s. So my anger is not like the typical right-wing nonsense you'll hear. It's based on BEING THERE for a semester. There's no genuineness there. They only party and posture and try to get money from nations richer than themselves. But it is a step above going to military war every year, as nations used to do.
PS so-called 'greenhouse gases' in the very unscientific Accord, are not the cause of global warming or cooling. Rather, the SUN ACTIVITY (i.e., solar flares) and the CORE of the Earth (i.e., magma warming and sending out shoots) plus WIND and OCEAN currents (which are in part determined by the foregoing three) are what cause weather. NONE OF WHICH MAN CAN CONTROL OR INFLUENCE. That is real science. Not, the claptrap of the #ParisAccord. Which, if they did succeed in reducing the temperature by 2 degrees centigrade, would be the BIGGEST DROP IN TEMPERATURE SINCE WE HAVE HAD DATA TO MEASURE, and could well cause catastrophe: for the 2 degrees is an AVERAGE, which means much lower in certain parts of the world than others, so many could die (not the least because a lower temperature is better for fleas carrying disease).